100% found this document useful (2 votes)
610 views2 pages

Key Decisions of The House of Federation Regarding Property Rights and Marriage in Ethiopia

The House of Federation in Ethiopia has made significant rulings regarding property rights and marriage, establishing that immovable property registered in one spouse's name is common property and that personal property improvements do not change its classification. It ruled that living apart does not dissolve a marriage and that subsequent cohabitation under an agreement does not constitute a valid marriage. Additionally, a wife has the right to partition her husband's estate acquired during marriage, affirming the equitable treatment of all parties under constitutional principles.

Uploaded by

Kumalaa Firrisaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
610 views2 pages

Key Decisions of The House of Federation Regarding Property Rights and Marriage in Ethiopia

The House of Federation in Ethiopia has made significant rulings regarding property rights and marriage, establishing that immovable property registered in one spouse's name is common property and that personal property improvements do not change its classification. It ruled that living apart does not dissolve a marriage and that subsequent cohabitation under an agreement does not constitute a valid marriage. Additionally, a wife has the right to partition her husband's estate acquired during marriage, affirming the equitable treatment of all parties under constitutional principles.

Uploaded by

Kumalaa Firrisaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

DAGNACHEW & MAHLET LAW FIRM LLP

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | +251 118637345 | [email protected]

Key Decisions of the House of Federation Regarding Property Rights and


Marriage in Ethiopia

Description

By DMLF Team

The House of Federation in Ethiopia plays a pivotal role in adjudicating matters that significantly impact
the CONSTITUTIONAL rights of citizens, particularly concerning property rights and marriage. Below is
an overview of critical decisions rendered by the House, which elucidate the legal framework governing
these issue.

Immovable Property as Common Property

L LP
In its ruling under Council of Constitutional Inquiry File No. 1607/2008 and House of Federation File

Firm
No. 022/08, it was determined that immovable property registered in the name of one spouse is
classified as common property. The house asserted that any claims suggesting such property belongs

L aw
to a third party, based solely on witness testimony, contravene established evidentiary principles and

a h let
infringe upon the common property rights enshrined in the Constitution.

Personal Property Improvements


& M
che w
According to Council of Constitutional Inquiry File No. 6588/2014 and House of Federation File No.
na
130/16, improvements made by spouses on personal property registered solely in the name of one the
g
Da
spouse do not change its status as personal property( contributions made by spouses towards
personal property do not alter its classification as personal property). Even when these enhancements
result in a mixture of personal and common property, such improved personal property remains
classified as individual property belonging to the spouse in whose name the property is registered.

Unconstitutionality of Conditional Dissolution of Marriage

Under Council of Constitutional Inquiry File No. 473/2003 and House of Federation File No. 49/10, it
was ruled that living apart for an extended period does not equate to dissolution of marriage.The
federal cassation bench’s prior ruling, which treated living apart as a dissolution, was deemed
unconstitutional, violating Articles of the Constitution. Similar conclusions were reached in Council of
Constitutional Inquiry File No. 1679/2008 and House of Federation File No. 50/10.

Unconstitutionality of Conditional Marriage

Page 1
Footer Tagline
DAGNACHEW & MAHLET LAW FIRM LLP
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | +251 118637345 | [email protected]

Following a court-ordered dissolution of marriage, any subsequent cohabitation under a written


agreement does not constitute a valid marriage according to constitutional standards. Initially
recognized by the federal cassation bench under File No. 23021, Volume 5, this principle was later
reversed by council of constitutional inquiry under file no. 7203/15 and the House of Federation under
File No. 804/16, which stated that creating a marriage through legal interpretation is unconstitutional
and deviates from recognized forms for establishing marriage.

Wife’s Right to Partition Property

As established by Council of Constitutional Inquiry File No. 2490/2009 and House of Federation File
No. 471/10, a wife possesses an unequivocal right to partition her husband’s estate acquired during
their marriage irrespective of her direct contribution to its acquisition or enhancement efforts. This
ruling is particularly significant in cases where a husband with multiple wives passes away; it affirms
that a wife residing with another wife within a shared household retains rights to partition her deceased
husband’s assets since assets acquired by husband is considered as communal property, based on

LP
Articles 25 and 40(1)(2) of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) Constitution.
L
Firm
Conclusion

aw
These landmark decisions underscore the commitment of the Ethiopian judiciary to uphold
L
treatment for all parties involved.
a h let
constitutional principles regarding property rights and marital relationships while ensuring equitable

& M
For further inquiry on the matter, you may contact us at [email protected]

che w
Category
g na
Da
1. Latest Posts

Date Created
January 25, 2025
Author
dmethiol_admin

Page 2
Footer Tagline

You might also like