0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views3 pages

Solar Project Overview

The document outlines a 5 MW solar project in Mysuru, Karnataka, focusing on reducing energy costs and promoting renewable energy. It includes feasibility studies, technology comparisons, cost estimations, vendor selections, and environmental impacts, along with a timeline for implementation and risk assessments. Recommendations suggest using monocrystalline panels with single-axis tracking and preferred vendors based on reliability and cost.

Uploaded by

Brijesh Patel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
54 views3 pages

Solar Project Overview

The document outlines a 5 MW solar project in Mysuru, Karnataka, focusing on reducing energy costs and promoting renewable energy. It includes feasibility studies, technology comparisons, cost estimations, vendor selections, and environmental impacts, along with a timeline for implementation and risk assessments. Recommendations suggest using monocrystalline panels with single-axis tracking and preferred vendors based on reliability and cost.

Uploaded by

Brijesh Patel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Solar Project Framework:

1. Project Overview

 Location: Mysuru, Karnataka


 Requirement: 5 MW solar installation
 Purpose: Specify the project’s goal (e.g., reducing energy costs, contributing to
renewable energy adoption).

2. Feasibility Study

 Solar Potential in Mysuru:


o Average solar irradiation: ~5.4-6 kWh/m²/day (research and cite specific data for
Mysuru).
o Land area required: Approx. 5-6 acres per MW (consider topography, shading,
and access).
 Regulatory Requirements:
o Guidelines from Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited (KREDL).
o Permits and approvals required.

3. Technology Comparison

 Photovoltaic Technologies:
o Monocrystalline Panels:
 Efficiency: ~19-22%
 Higher cost, but space-efficient.
o Polycrystalline Panels:
 Efficiency: ~15-18%
 Lower cost, less efficient than monocrystalline.
o Thin-Film Panels:
 Efficiency: ~10-12%
 Lower cost, performs better in low-light conditions.
 Inverter Types:
o Central Inverters vs. String Inverters.
 Tracking Systems:
o Fixed Tilt vs. Single Axis Tracking (increases efficiency by ~20-30%).

4. Cost Estimation
 Capital Expenditure (CAPEX):
o Equipment: Panels, inverters, tracking systems.
o Installation costs: Labor, land preparation, structural setup.
o Estimated range: ₹3.5–5 crore/MW (₹17.5–25 crore for 5 MW).
 Operational Expenditure (OPEX):
o Maintenance, cleaning, and operational staff.
o Annual costs: ~₹5-7 lakh/MW.
 Payback Period:
o Depending on tariffs and incentives, typically 5-7 years.
 Breakdown:
o Panel Costs: ~₹1.5–2 crore/MW.
o Inverters: ~₹50-75 lakh/MW.
o Balance of Systems (BOS): ~₹1-1.5 crore/MW.

5. Vendor Comparison

 Leading Vendors:
o Tata Power Solar
o Adani Solar
o Vikram Solar
o Waaree Energies
o RenewSys
 Criteria for Selection:
o Experience with large-scale installations.
o Technology offerings.
o Warranty and after-sales service.
o Project timelines and costs.

6. Incentives and Financing Options

 Central and State Subsidies:


o Details of KREDL policies and Central Government incentives under the National
Solar Mission.
 Net Metering Policies:
o Current status and benefits in Karnataka.
 Funding Options:
o Green loans, PPA models, or direct CAPEX funding.
7. Environmental and Economic Impact

 Environmental Benefits:
o Reduction in carbon emissions.
o Contribution to Karnataka’s renewable energy targets.
 Economic Benefits:
o Cost savings over 25 years (lifetime of the panels).
o Potential revenue from selling excess power.

8. Timeline and Implementation Plan

 Phases:
o Feasibility and design: 1-2 months.
o Procurement: 1-2 months.
o Installation and commissioning: 3-6 months.
 Milestones:
o Land acquisition, permits, procurement, testing, and operational handover.

9. Risk Assessment

 Weather-related risks.
 Regulatory changes.
 Delays in procurement or installation.

10. Recommendations

 Best technology for Mysuru’s climate: Monocrystalline with single-axis tracking.


 Preferred vendors based on cost and reliability.
 Financing model based on organizational needs.

You might also like