Chapter 5
Chapter 5
Department of Economics
University of Toronto
[email protected]
PX X + PY Y = I
Where:
PX and PY are the prices of goods X and Y .
I is the individual’s income.
X and Y are the quantities of goods consumed.
A change in income shifts the budget constraint
outward (higher income)
PX
or inward (lower income), but the slope − PY remains unchanged.
U(X , Y ) = f (X , Y )
PX X + PY Y = I
The solution to the utility maximization problem yields the optimal bundle
(X ∗ , Y ∗ ), where the marginal rate of substitution (MRS) equals the price
ratio:
MUX PX
=
MUY PY
∆Q
The income effect is given by ∆I
There are two additional sub-types of goods that are common, both of
these are classified as normal goods because, as income increases, the
quantity demanded for them increases as well, and vice versa.
PX′ X + PY Y = I
P′
Slope changes to − PYX .
When the price of a good changes relative to another, two things happen:
1 One good becomes relatively more expensive, and the other relatively
less.
2 The total purchasing power of a consumer’s income changes.
Total Effect:
Substitution Effect:
To do this for a fall in the price of basketball tickets, shift the new
budget constraint (BC2 ) inward until it is tangent with the old
indifference curve (BC ′ ).
Movement along the original indifference curve (A to A′ )
Income Effect:
When the price of basketball tickets decreases, the consumer can afford to
purchase a larger bundle than before.
Represented by the change in the quantity of goods consumed from
bundle A′ (after the substitution effect) to bundle B
Figure 5.8 Substitution Effects and Income Effects for Two Normal
Mir Ahasan Kabir, Ph.D. (UofT) Chapter 5 October 17, 2024 28 / 56
5.3 Substitution and Income Effects
Giffen goods: goods for which a fall in price leads the consumer to want
less of the good
An extreme case where the good is inferior and the income effect
outweighs the substitution effect.
When the price of a Giffen good drops, the substitution effect (which
acts to increase demand) is smaller than the income effect.
- Results in an upward sloping demand curve!
At his current income level, Randall’s income elasticity for frozen dinners is
-0.75. If the price of frozen dinners decreases by 10%, the substitution
effect will cause Randall to his consumption of frozen dinners, and
the income effect will cause Randall to his consumption of frozen
dinners.
a increase; increase
b increase; decrease
c decrease; increase
d decrease; decrease
At his current income level, Randall’s income elasticity for frozen dinners is
-0.75. If the price of frozen dinners decreases by 10%, the substitution
effect will cause Randall to his consumption of frozen dinners, and
the income effect will cause Randall to his consumption of frozen
dinners.
a increase; increase
b increase; decrease
c decrease; increase
d decrease; decrease
∂X ∗
∂X ∂X ∂I
= + ×
∂PX ∂PX ∂I ∂PX
How a change in the price of one good affects the demand for another.
Cross price elasticity:
∂QX PY
EXY = ×
∂PY QX
EXY > 0: Goods X and Y are substitutes.
EXY < 0: Goods X and Y are complements.
Example
Substitutes: Tea and coffee, butter and margarine.
Complements: Left shoes and right shoes, cars and gasoline.
Q1 = 50 − 2P, Q2 = 40 − P
Malachi consumes two goods: DVD rentals (R) and coffee (C). His utility
function is:
U(R, C ) = R 0.75 C 0.25
A Malachi has $16 to spend, with the prices of rentals at $4 and coffee
at $2 per cup. Solve for the optimal bundle.
B Malachi signs up for a membership that reduces the price of rentals to
$2. Solve for the substitution effect and income effect.
C From your answer to part (b), are DVD rentals and coffee normal or
inferior goods for Malachi? Explain.
Lagrangian:
First-Order Conditions:
∂L
= 0.75R −0.25 C 0.25 − 4λ = 0
∂R
∂L
= 0.25R 0.75 C −0.75 − 2λ = 0
∂C
∂L
= 16 − 4R − 2C = 0
∂λ
Mir Ahasan Kabir, Ph.D. (UofT) Chapter 5 October 17, 2024 48 / 56
Question 2 (Part A): Solving for the Optimal Bundle
R = 1.5C
Plug into the budget constraint:
16 − 4R − 2C = 0 =⇒ 6C + 2C = 16
C ∗ = 2, R ∗ = 3
Lagrangian:
Lagrangian:
Income Effect: Use the new prices and the original income:
R ∗ = 6, C∗ = 2
Conclusion: The income effect is positive for both rentals and coffee,
meaning both goods are normal.