Capgemini Supply Chain Strategy Review
Capgemini Supply Chain Strategy Review
The client’s new COO was faced with understanding their business
and where and how their Supply Chain could improve profitability.
• Client had a new senior executive over Supply Chain with a more diverse
operational background outside of the function.
• The company had outsourced almost all of their Supply Chain functions, and had
very recently spun out its warehousing operations in its largest market to a 3PL.
• Recent issues regarding legacy sourcing decisions made close to a decade ago
clouded an understanding of real operational performance.
• Staffing had been greatly reduced throughout the organization given a recent
economic downturn in Europe and the United States a few years earlier.
• With so much of the operations outsourced, what can and should we be doing to
optimize our contractual relationships and manage our partners?
• What metrics should we continue to use and what new ones might we consider?
• What areas should we make changes in and what should we be doing differently?
The following document is a mix of what are the options for a project
like this, how to do one and the structure we completed for this client.
What ‘is our Supply Chain Strategy’ is two different things, though
semantics and mixed usage creates obvious confusion.
The first is more of a ‘vision’ or a choice made by the company with respect
to how they will view the execution of their operational areas, and where
and how they will make the trade-offs. The second is a detailed planning
document, by sub-functional area, showing metrics, targets, actions,
accountability and anticipated results.
The key word is ‘trade-offs’. Given our existing and future business,
what priorities do we have for the different performance attributes.
Responsiveness
Custom Configured Agile Flexible
• Respond to unpredictable demand
• Focus is on the end-user • Solving customer problems is major
• Exclusive, short-lifecycle products
• Products designed to have common thrust of this strategy
• Asset utilization not highly relevant
components and customized later • Usually used for products which have
towards total costs
• Smooth forecasting at front end a high level of service involved
• Common components/materials
• Fulfillment/meeting customer needs is • Flexible processes
• This strategy used to support
critical • Price insensitive customers
companies with Industrial customers
The examples fit the needs of many companies, but not everyone.
Source: Supply Chain Quarterly, though believe original concept was from A.T. Kearney
Product Development How broad a product range do I need? How often do I need new products?
Inbound Can I use full truck load ground to get my orders or expedite shipments?
Warehousing /
Should I have dedicated warehouses or let a 3PL handle it?
Inventory
Warehousing /
At what cost is perfect fulfillment worth it to me? What is acceptable?
Inventory
Warehousing /
What ‘tail’ products will we keep, for how long, and at for what order levels?
Inventory
Outbound/Delivery What minimums order quantities will I allow? How do I do bracket pricing?
This was a quick assignment, and these types of projects are all
different, but the overall work flowed similar to the four steps below.
1 2 3 4
Interview
Gather Data Analysis Final Report
Program
• Staff including the CEO, Marketing, R&D, Finance, Accounting, IT, the
3PL and all of the Supply Chain function were interviewed.
• Close to 100 documents were received and reviewed.
• The Forecasting and Inventory sections contained implementation details
that the client asked for given she was knew.
• The recommendations build on the existing strategy, while emphasizing
the need to perfect the Demand Planning/Forecasting expertise.
• A total of 59 recommendations across all areas were detailed on the
following pages. Further explanations were shown in more detail.
• The project was quick, and only lasted about 5 weeks. The final report
was around 110 pages, of which the structure of some is shown here.
The Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy document was broken out
into the 5 sections below, and this document combines 1 into 5.
Lower working
Operate with minimal tolerable overhead capital costs
Delivery
Ensure optimal sales thru availability
Overpay for product Expedite fees Extra picking fees ClientCo pays delivery
Poor quality Air freight Inventory carry costs Sales comp on cancellations
ClientCo
The data above (and some row names) are all illustrative, and though
each competitor has a unique business model, it can be very valuable.
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 14
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Competitor Profile
2
As part of the project, CI completed Supply Chain focused profiles of
the client’s top competitors in the United States.
Headquarters Revenue / Income Ownership / Leadership Marketing (Customers/Products)
14,875 MM USD • Public: NYSE: ZXY
London, UK • Sold in 12,300 retail stores
2,528 MM • CEO – Michael Freedman
• Partnered with other British
Founded Employees • President – Diana Jax
companies and key charities
• COO – Richard Guha
1960 23,400 • Heavy into sports partnerships
• CFO – John Simpson
Supply Chain Information Product Segments
Note: Used most recent and best sources from the internet. Timing may vary.
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 15
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Sourcing Cost Reduction Options
2
In focusing on Sourcing, costs can be primarily reduced via four
different venues (not including design and other changes).
Changing Suppliers A
Suppliers
• TastyTreats
1 Supplier A Paris, France • Chewy Packs for Kids 58.027 29.0
• Chewy Bars
• PrettySkin
3 Supplier C Essex, UK • YouAintaHag 40,592 20.2
• Skin Droppers
• Yumsters
4 Supplier D Atlanta, Georgia
• Besties Candies
28,919 14.9
• Headachers
5 Supplier E Shenzhen, China
• MightzFines
25,430 12.8
• Factory space
• RM/WIP/FG holding
• Climate control, etc. Is there market Would the market
• Processing equipment demand for these (e.g. competitors)
• Packaging (if internal) services? source from us?
* Overall inventory level could rise to support higher fulfillment rate, but premise is that
unneeded inventory in those SKUs that had it will be reduced/minimized.
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 21
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Failure of ‘too much’ vs. ‘too little’
2
The basic premise of forecasting is the attempt to best estimate
required customer demand. Being over or under both have costs.
Risk of product being written-off 1% per year Lost profit from missed sale +70%
Working capital cost of inventory 8% per year Wholesaler fine for late delivery $12 per case
Increased chance of discounting n/a Air shipping & expedite fees n/a
Total Cost of Excess Inventory 1% per month Staff labor to process back-order n/a
Order Order
Quantity Quantity
Re-order Re-order
Point Point
Time Time
Order Lead-time
Red in the first chart shows analysis of the demand stronger than anticipated. A review of the expected re-order point
is made (moved up) and vigilant monitoring would be prudent. Impact to safety stock requirements may be justified.
Green shows demand to have been lower than the original forecast. This would result in a delay of the re-order date.
In all cases of demand changes, coordination and warning needs to provided to the Supplier for their preparation.
The Blue shows that demand followed the original forecast (unlikely by the way), but that an impact (e.g. promotion) is
planned by marketing or the field, and the demand slope is expected to change drastically.
Forecasting resources
New demand planning tools
Write-offs
Write-off investigations
Finished Goods (FG) Carry Cost Excess
New Sunset process
SKU proliferation
New cost metric/dashboard
Stock-out investigations
Damages
$196 k
TBD $371 k
5 645.5 29.5%
$2,138 K
10 957.7 43.6%
A few percent of this client’s SKUs represented over 60% of their losses,
with most concentrated in a few product lines and markets.
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 27
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Inventory – Investigate Highest Losses
3
Our team analyzed the top SKUs (losses) to better understand what
events, accidents or poor forecasting resulted in their write-offs.
Used In Balance
Raw Material Notes
(Products) ($ thousands)
Total 10,631
Theft, damage or other negative result Not a major issue other than
Shrinkage
while inventory is in your possession. major crime events (e.g hijack)
25.8%
52.1%
47.9%
Note: These values are believed to be a consolidation of all markets for the given products.
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 32
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Inventory - Sunset Process
3
The cost of SKU proliferation manifests itself at both the time of
addition of a new product, as well as throughout its life.
Are the Have the sales Does MOQ Are there new It is a
overall sales been create an products that complimentary
low? declining? expiration risk? replace it? product?
The questions above should drive the answer and are mostly factual
(i.e. not opinions). Completing this analysis of the entire long-tail
should highlight those obvious ones no one wants to ‘rescue’.
Note: There may be more questions here, and Marketing should complete the analysis and prep Executives.
Link to Provide
Establish Base Drive
Supply Access /
Strategic Metrics on Supporting
Chain Create
Goals Real Data Actions
Metrics Dashboard
• Revenue • Fulfillment • SAP or JDE / Oracle • Develop a • Assign new staff to issues
• Growth • COGS • Financial reporting dashboard format • Alter safety stocks
• New markets • Sourcing costs • Physical inventory • Assign an owner • More carefully manage Air freight
• Overhead costs • Logistics costs • 3PL reporting • Assign each metric • ……….
• Working capital • Expedite levels • Marketing data and owner
• Equity value / stock • Inventory/sales
• New products • Inventory aging
• Wholesalers • Out-of-stocks
• Retention • Returns / costs
• Dollars / order • SCM staffing
• Revenue mix (new
products or
customers vs. old)
We identified all of the options, and then jointly with the Supply Chain
Team, and then created a new comprehensive metric as the focus.
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 35
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy SCM Dashboard
4
A top level metric showing excess costs created by Supply Chain was
developed with an interim dashboard structure for ease of focus.
Client Co
The premise of this metric is that “a perfect Supply Chain would cost
‘X’ dollars to operate, and this number is everything above that.”
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 36
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Results – Original beliefs
5
One of the first things CI did was validate and dispel some of the
general beliefs of the executive team and the Board of Directors.
2% was our forecast error for the Prior calculation was made
last quarter of 2012 when we did Over 13% was the reality. without including key data that
an analysis. We are doing okay. impacts accuracy.
Inventory
Demand Planning
Management
• New Forecasting staff • New Sunset selection parameters
• New Demand Planning tool • Inventory holding changes
• Evaluation of SAP usage • Write-off investigation
• New forecast measures • Stock-out flagging evaluation
• Review Demand variability
Identify all market impacting activities, Consolidate list, assess past impacts and
Workshop
evaluate past impacts on actual then roll-out a system to the countries
24 demand, create a form and system to
to create
where they provide the information back
list of all
obtain from country MDs to Paris for forecasting implications
Item # - this is a reference number per the recommendations at the front of this deck
Jay Martin May 2012 Supply Chain [Link] 40
Supply Chain Assessment & Strategy Contact Information
Contact Details
Any questions, please contact:
Jay Martin
Chief Innovation, Inc.
Dallas, Texas