0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Chapter-1-Introduction

This document introduces distributed systems, defining them as collections of independent computers that present a unified interface to users. It discusses the evolution of computing from centralized systems to distributed architectures, highlighting key characteristics such as transparency, scalability, and resource sharing. Additionally, it covers the organization and goals of distributed systems, including middleware, and outlines the advantages and disadvantages of such systems.

Uploaded by

lcon 22
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Chapter-1-Introduction

This document introduces distributed systems, defining them as collections of independent computers that present a unified interface to users. It discusses the evolution of computing from centralized systems to distributed architectures, highlighting key characteristics such as transparency, scalability, and resource sharing. Additionally, it covers the organization and goals of distributed systems, including middleware, and outlines the advantages and disadvantages of such systems.

Uploaded by

lcon 22
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 53

Chapter 1

Introduction to Distributed Systems


1.1 Introduction and Definition
 before the mid-80s, computers were
 very expensive (hundred of thousands or even millions of
dollars)
 very slow (a few thousand instructions per second)
 not connected among themselves
 after the mid-80s: two major developments
 cheap and powerful microprocessor-based computers
appeared
 computer networks
 LANs at speeds ranging from 10 to 1000 Mbps
 WANs at speed ranging from 64 Kbps to gigabits/sec
 consequence
 feasibility of using a large network of computers to work
for the same application; this is in contrast to the old
centralized systems where there was a single computer
with its peripherals
 Definition of a Distributed System
 a distributed system is:
2
a collection of independent computers that appears to its
users as a single coherent system - computer (Tanenbaum
& Van Steen)

 this definition has two aspects:


1. hardware: autonomous machines
2. software: a single system view for the users
 Other Definitions a distributed system is a system designed
to support the development of applications and services
which can exploit a physical architecture consisting of
multiple, autonomous processing elements that do not
share primary memory but cooperate by sending
asynchronous messages over a communication network
(Blair & Stefani)
 Why Distributed?
3
 Resource and Data Sharing
 printers, databases, multimedia servers, ...
 Availability, Reliability
 the loss of some instances can be hidden
 Scalability, Extensibility
 the system grows with demand (e.g., extra servers)
 Performance
 huge power (CPU, memory, ...) available
 Inherent distribution, communication
 organizational distribution, e-mail, video Characteristics of
Distributed Systems

4
 differences between the computers and the ways they
communicate are hidden from users
 users and applications can interact with a distributed
system in a consistent and uniform way regardless of
location
 distributed systems should be easy to expand and scale
 a distributed system is normally continuously available,
even if there may be partial failures
- Users and applications should not notice that parts are
being replaced or fixed, or that new parts are added to serve
more users or applications
1.2 Organization and Goals of a Distributed System

5
 to support heterogeneous computers and networks and to
provide a single-system view, a distributed system is often
organized by means of a layer of software called middleware
that extends over multiple machines

6
a distributed system organized as middleware; note that the middleware
layer extends over multiple machines
 Goals of a distributed system: a distributed system should
 make resources accessible(printers, computers, storage
facilities, data, files, Web pages, ...)
 reasons: economics, to collaborate and exchange
information
 be transparent: hide the fact that the resources and
processes are distributed across multiple computers.
be open
 be scalable

7
 Transparency in a Distributed System
 a distributed system that is able to present itself to users
and applications as if it were only a single computer
system is said to be transparent
 different forms of transparency in a distributed system
Transparency Description
Access Hide differences in data representation
and how a resource is accessed
Location Hide where a resource is physically located; where
is http://www.prenhall.com/index.html? (naming)
Migration Hide that a resource may move to another location
Relocation Hide that a resource may be moved to another
location while in use; e.g., mobile users using their
wireless laptops
8
Replication Hide that a resource is replicated
Concurrency Hide that a resource may be shared by several
competitive users; a resource must be left in a
consistent state
Failure Hide the failure and recovery of a resource
Persistence Hide whether a (software) resource is in memory
or on disk
 Openness in a Distributed System
 a distributed system should be open
 we need well-defined interfaces
 interoperability
 components of different origin can communicate
 portability
9
 components work on different platforms
 another goal of an open distributed system is that it
should be flexible and extensible; easy to configure the
system out of different components; easy to add new
components, replace existing ones
 an Open Distributed System is a system that offers
services according to standard rules that describe the
syntax and semantics of those services; e.g., protocols in
networks
 in distributed systems, such services are often specified
through interfaces often described using an Interface
Definition Language (IDL)
 specify only syntax: the names of the functions, types of
parameters, return values, possible exceptions, ...
10
 Scalability in Distributed Systems
 a distributed system should be scalable
 size: adding more users and resources to the system
 geographically: users and resources may be far apart
 administratively: should be easy to manage even if it spans
many administrative organizations
 scalability problems: performance problems caused by
limited capacity of servers and networks
Concept Example
Single server for all users-mostly for security
Centralized services
reasons
Centralized data A single on-line telephone book
Centralized algorithms Doing routing based on complete information
11
examples of scalability limitations

 Scaling Techniques
 how to solve scaling problems
 the problem is mainly performance, and arises as a result
of limitations in the capacity of servers and networks (for
geographical scalability)
 three possible solutions: hiding communication latencies,
distribution, and replication
a. Hide Communication Latencies
 try to avoid waiting for responses to remote service
requests
 let the requester do other useful job
12
 i.e., construct requesting applications that use only
asynchronous communication instead of synchronous
communication; when a reply arrives the application is
interrupted
 good for batch processing and parallel applications but
not for interactive applications
 for interactive applications, move part of the job to the
client to reduce communication; e.g. filling a form and
checking the entries

13
(a) a server checking the correctness of field entries
(b) a client doing the job
14
e.g., shipping code is now supported in Web applications
using Java Applets
b. Distribution
 e.g., DNS - Domain Name System
 divide the name space into zones
 for details, see later in Chapter 4 - Naming

15
an example of dividing the DNS name space into zones
c. Replication

16
 replicate components across a distributed system to
increase availability and for load balancing, leading to
better performance
 decided by the owner of a resource
 caching (a special form of replication) also reduces
communication latency; decided by the user
 but, caching and replication may lead to consistency
problems (see Chapter 6 - Consistency and
Replication)
Pros and Cons of Distributed Systems
Advantages of Distributed Systems

17
 Performance: Very often a collection of processors can provide
higher performance (and better price/performance ratio) than a
centralized computer.
 Distribution: many applications involve, by their nature,
spatially separated machines (banking, commercial, automotive
system).
 Reliability (fault tolerance): if some of the machines crash, the
system can survive.
 Incremental growth: as requirements on processing power
grow, new machines can be added incrementally.
 Sharing of data/resources: shared data is essential to many
applications (banking, computer supported cooperative work,
reservation systems); other resources can be also shared (e.g.
expensive printers).
 Communication: facilitates human-to-human communication.
18
Disadvantages of Distributed Systems

 Difficulties of developing distributed software:


how should operating systems, programming
languages and applications look like?
 Networking problems: several problems are created
by the network infrastructure, which have to be dealt
with: loss of messages, overloading, ...
 Security problems: sharing generates the problem
of data security.
1.3 Hardware and Software Concepts

19
 Hardware Concepts
 different classification schemes exist
 multiprocessors - with shared memory
 multicomputers - that do not share memory
 can be homogeneous or heterogeneous

20
 a

single backbone

21
different basic organizations of processors and memories in distributed
systems
Parallel system?
 Multiprocessors - Shared Memory
 the shared memory has to be coherent - the same value
written by one processor must be read by another
processor
 performance problem for bus-based organization since the
bus will be overloaded as the number of processors
increases
 the solution is to add a high-speed cache memory between
the processors and the bus to hold the most recently
accessed words; may result in incoherent memory

22
a bus-based multiprocessor
 bus-based multiprocessors are difficult to scale even with
caches
 two possible solutions: crossbar switch and omega
network
 Crossbar switch
 divide memory into modules and connect them to the
processors with a crossbar switch
 at every intersection, a crosspoint switch is opened and
closed to establish connection
23
 problem: expensive; with n CPUs and n memories, n2
switches are required

 Omega network
24
 use switches with multiple input and output lines
 drawback: high latency because of several switching
stages between the CPU and memory

25
 Homogeneous Multicomputer Systems
 also referred to as System Area Networks (SANs)
 the nodes are mounted on a big rack and connected
through a high-performance network
 could be bus-based or switch-based
 bus-based
 shared multiaccess network such as Fast Ethernet can be
used and messages are broadcasted
 performance drops highly with more than 25-100 nodes
(contention)
 switch-based
 messages are routed through an interconnection network
 two popular topologies: meshes (or grids) and hypercubes
26
Hypercube
Grid
 Heterogeneous Multicomputer Systems
 most distributed systems are built on heterogeneous
multicomputer systems

27
 the computers could be different in processor type,
memory size, architecture, power, operating system, etc.
and the interconnection network may be highly
heterogeneous as well
 the distributed system provides a software layer to hide the
heterogeneity at the hardware level; i.e., provides
transparency
 Software Concepts
 OSs in relation to distributed systems
 tightly-coupled systems, referred to as distributed OSs
(DOS)
 the OS tries to maintain a single, global view of the
resources it manages

28
 used for multiprocessors and homogeneous
multicomputers
 loosely-coupled systems, referred to as network OSs
(NOS)
 a collection of computers each running its own OS; they
work together to make their services and resources
available to others
 used for heterogeneous multicomputers
 Middleware: to enhance the services of NOSs so that a
better support for distribution transparency is provided
 Summary of main issues
System Description Main Goal

29
Tightly-coupled operating system for Hide and manage
DOS multiprocessors and homogeneous hardware
multicomputers resources
Loosely-coupled operating system for Offer local
NOS heterogeneous multicomputers (LAN and services to remote
WAN) clients
Provide
Additional layer atop of NOS implementing
Middleware distribution
general-purpose services
transparency
an overview of DOSs, NOSs, and middleware
 Distributed Operating Systems
 two types
 multiprocessor operating system: to manage the resources
of a multiprocessor

30
 multicomputer operating system: for homogeneous
multicomputers
 Uniprocessor Operating Systems
 separating applications from operating system code
through a microkernel

31
 Multiprocessor Operating Systems
 extended uniprocessor operating systems to support
multiple processors having access to a shared memory
 a protection mechanism is required for concurrent access
to guarantee consistency
 two synchronization mechanisms: semaphores and
monitors
 semaphore: an integer with two atomic operations down (if
s=0 then sleep; s := s-1) and up (s := s+1; wakeup a
sleeping process if any)
 monitor: a programming language construct consisting of
procedures and variables that can be accessed only by the
procedures of the monitor; only a single process at a time
is allowed to execute a procedure
32
 Multicomputer Operating Systems
 processors can not share memory; instead communication
is through message passing
 each node has its own
 kernel for managing local resources
 separate module for handling interprocessor
communication

33
general structure of a multicomputer operating system
 Distributed Shared Memory Systems

34
 how to emulate shared memories on distributed systems to
provide a virtual shared memory
 page-based distributed shared memory (DSM) - use the
virtual memory capabilities of each individual node

35
pages of address space distributed among four machines

situation after CPU 1 references page 10

 read-only pages can be easily replicated

36
situation if page 10 is read only and replication is used
 Network Operating Systems
 possibly heterogeneous underlying hardware
 constructed from a collection of uniprocessor systems,
each with its own operating system and connected to each
other in a computer network

37
general structure of a network operating system
 Services offered by network operating systems
 remote login (rlogin)
 remote file copy (rcp)
38
 shared file systems through file servers

two clients and a server in a network operating system


 Middleware
 a distributed operating system is not intended to handle a
collection of independent computers but provides
transparency and ease of use

39
 a network operating system does not provide a view of a
single coherent system but is scalable and open
 combine the scalability and openness of network operating
systems and the transparency and ease of use of
distributed operating systems
 this is achieved through a middleware, another layer of
software

40
general structure of a distributed system as middleware

41
 different middleware models exist
 treat every resource as a file; just as in UNIX
 through Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) - calling a
procedure on a remote machine
 distributed object invocation
 (details later in Chapter 2 - Communication)
 middleware services
 access transparency: by hiding the low-level message
passing
 naming: such as a URL in the WWW
 distributed transactions: by allowing multiple read and
write operations to occur atomically
42
 security
 Middleware and Openness
 in an open middleware-based distributed system, the
protocols used by each middleware layer should be the
same, as well as the interfaces they offer to applications

43
 a comparison between multiprocessor operating systems,
multicomputer operating systems, network operating
systems, and middleware-based distributed systems
Item Distributed OS Network Middleware

44
Multiproc Multicomp OS -based OS
Degree of
Very High High Low High
transparency
Same OS on all nodes Yes Yes No No
Number of copies of
1 N N N
OS
Basis for Shared Model
Messages Files
communication memory specific
Global, Global,
Resource management Per node Per node
central distributed
Scalability No Moderately Yes Varies
Openness Closed Closed Open Open
1.4 The Client-Server Model
 how are processes organized in a system
45
 thinking in terms of clients requesting services from
servers

general interaction between a client and a server


 Application Layering

46
 no clear distinction between a client and a server; for
instance a server for a distributed database may act as a
client when it forwards requests to different file servers
 three levels exist
 the user-interface level: implemented by clients and
contains all that is required by a client; usually
through GUIs, but not necessarily
 the processing level: contains the applications
 the data level: contains the programs that maintain the
actual data dealt with
 the general organization of an Internet search engine into
three different layers

47
 Client-Server Architectures

48
 how to physically distribute a client-server application
across several machines
 Multitiered Architectures

49
Two-tiered architecture: alternative client-server organizations
a) put only terminal-dependent part of the user interface on the
client machine and let the applications remotely control the
presentation
b) put the entire user-interface software on the client side
c) move part of the application to the client, e.g. checking
correctness in filling forms
d) and e) are for powerful client machines

50
three tiered architecture: an example of a server acting as a client
 Modern Architectures

51
 vertical distribution: when the different tiers correspond
directly with the logical organization of applications
 horizontal distribution: physically split up the client or the
server into logically equivalent parts. e.g. Web server

52
an example of horizontal distribution of a Web service

53

You might also like