Sciadv Adp0348
Sciadv Adp0348
INTRODUCTION Recent efforts behind this unmet need have led to some methods
Somatosensory networks provide precise sensory feedback through for the recognition of softness and texture separately (28–32). To es-
cutaneous mechanoreceptors in which slow adaptive (SA) and fast timate softness, sensory systems (33–37) such as self-locked stretch-
adaptive (FA) receptors respond sensitively and selectively to static able strain sensors (38) and needle-based modulus probes (39) were
and dynamic pressure, enabling human hands to realize object rec- developed, relying on static (force-displacement) and dynamic (am-
ognition (e.g., softness and texture) for dexterous manipulation in plitude, phase, and frequency) principles, respectively. Yet, static
grasping tasks (1–5). The understanding of human haptic percep- measuring techniques risk damaging fragile samples resulting from
tion has promoted advancements in robotics, endowing robots with the same contact force, whereas dynamic methods encounter accu-
sophisticated haptic sensing capabilities for environment aware- racy problems caused by the amplification of mass effects at high fre-
ness, recognition of threats, and fine motor tasks, thus benefiting quencies. Furthermore, their attempts concentrate only on feedback
applications in artificial intelligence, medical diagnostics, agricul- from normal stimuli, ignoring the interference caused by sensor tilt
ture picking, and human-robot interaction (6–12). Inspired by the on the sample surface due to shear forces in practical application cir-
functionality of SA and FA receptors, several strategies have been cumstances. To recognize surficial textures (40–47), artificial sensory
implemented to integrate flexible haptic sensors, such as piezoresis- systems based on an iontronic sensor (48) and integrated triboelectric-
tive (13–17), piezoelectric (18–21), triboelectric (22, 23), and ca- piezoresistive sensing modules (40) were created to effectively per-
pacitive (24–27) types, into robotic systems, enabling touch-based ceive static pressure and dynamic vibration signals. However, the
object recognition through the extraction and analysis of haptic sliding shear force and the interfacial slippage were neglected, lead-
information (e.g., pressure, vibration, and strain). However, achiev- ing to a failure to extract quantitative parameters in the recognition
ing precise execution of adaptive grasping requiring high dexterity process (43, 49). Thus far, the current methods are incapable of si-
in robotic systems remains a daunting challenge due to the diffi- multaneously quantifying softness and texture, primarily due to the
culty in determining the adaptive gripping force for objects with difficulty of synergistically decoding the multidimensional static
distinct softness and texture features. pressotactile and the dynamic vibrotactile encoding of features.
Hence, designing haptic sensors capable of accurately measuring
multidimensional static and dynamic stimuli is of considerable
1
importance toward developing a nondestructive and precise meth-
College of Mechanical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Special Purpose Equipment
and Advanced Processing Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, odology for assessing softness and texture features, greatly benefiting
Zhejiang 310023, China. 2School of Engineering, Westlake University, Hangzhou, potential applications in robotic grasping tasks that require adaptive
Zhejiang 310030, China. 3College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University gripping force for scarless, antislippage interactions.
of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China. 4Zhijiang College of Zhejiang
University of Technology, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312030, China. 5Center for Optoelectronics
Here, we report a quantitative softness and texture bimodal haptic
Materials and Devices, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, sensor that transcends human haptic perception for implementation
China. 6Collaborative Innovation Center of High-end Laser Manufacturing Equip- in adaptive grasping tasks of intelligent robots (Fig. 1A). The synergis-
ment (National “2011 Plan”), Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, tic effect of piezoelectric and piezoresistive modules that mimic the
Zhejiang 310023, China.
*Corresponding author. Email: wuhuaping@gmail.com (H.W.); hanqing.jiang@ functionality of FA and SA receptors within biological percep-
westlake.edu.cn (H.J.) tion (Fig. 1B, I) allows for the detection of both static pressure and
Fig. 1. Human fingertip–inspired softness and texture bimodal haptic sensor. (A) Schematic illustrations of intelligent robots with anthropomorphic perception func- Downloaded from https://www.science.org on July 30, 2024
tions for quantifying the softness and texture of objects involved in the adaptive grasping process. (B) Schematic illustrations of the structure of human skin and the bi-
modal haptic sensor in an exploded view. (I) Human skin consists of slow-adapting mechanoreceptors [Merkel disc (MD) and Ruffini corpuscle (RC)] for static stimuli and
fast-adapting mechanoreceptors [Meissner corpuscle (MC) and Pacinian corpuscle (PC)] for dynamic stimuli. When the fingertip touches an object, excitatory potentials
are generated and transmitted along the sensory synapse to the brain, allowing the evaluation of the softness and texture characteristics of the object. The haptic sensor
comprises two flexible sensing layers for piezoelectric and piezoresistive modes: The piezoelectric layer mimics the fast-adapting mechanoreceptors to sense high-
frequency dynamic stimuli, while the piezoresistive layers capture static stimuli like the slow-adapting mechanoreceptors. The artificial haptic sensor is capable of simul-
taneously identifying softness and texture characteristics using multidimensional piezoresistive and piezoelectric feedback mechanisms and with the assistance of the
depth network. (II) The bimodal sensor, designed for dynamic and static three-dimensional force perception, outperforms traditional sensors lacking softness and texture
feedback, thus enabling stable, damage-free handling of delicate white strawberries without slippage.
high-frequency vibrations to further identify softness and texture decreases to 35.8 mV N−1. This decrease is due to the further separa-
characteristics assisted by a deep neural network similar to the central tion between the positive and negative charge carrier centers, which
nervous system. The multidimensional sensing capabilities enable can only orient in a single direction, leading to the upper limit in the
precise elastic coefficient measurements regardless of the interaction pressure range. A uniaxial shear force of 1 Hz applied along the x
orientation while also decoding texture-induced deformation and in- direction induces compressive strain and a corresponding increase
terfacial adhesion. The robot integrated with this bimodal haptic sen- in piezoelectric voltage at c1 and c3 elements while having negligible
sor is capable of performing challenging tasks such as identifying effects on the strain and voltage output of the c2 and c4 elements
porcine esophageal pathological tissues and adaptively grasping white (inset of Fig. 2D). The piezoelectric module exhibits excellent sensi-
strawberries with an appropriate gripping force without damage or tivity and good linearity toward shear force ranging from 0.1 to 7 N,
slippage (Fig. 1B, II). Our work presents a methodology toward quan- with respective values of 179.1 and 261 mV N−1 (Fig. 2D). Besides,
titative, nondestructive, and precise softness and texture measure- the piezoresistive module relies on the pressure-induced conductive
ment platforms adaptable to various scenarios, which would open up pathway change, resulting in a sensitivity of 692 mV N−1 below a
many applications including clinical diagnosis, artificial intelligence, normal force of 1 N, whereas sensitivity recorded at the force range
and human-machine interactions. of 1 to 7 N is 152 mV N−1 (Fig. 2E). The shear force response capa-
bility of the piezoresistive module yields a large resistance change
with a high sensitivity of 839 mV N−1, which becomes saturated at a
RESULTS sensitivity of 85 mV N−1 (Fig. 2F).
Sensing characterization of the bimodal The negligible piezoresistive sensing signals from the c2 and c4
multidimensional sensor elements are due to the specific structural design and assembly
To enable multiple mechanical force sensing functionalities, our method. The piezoresistive layer was connected to the interdigital
haptic sensor is designed with piezoelectric and piezoresistive lay- electrode without adhesive, merely forming a contact. This setup
Fig. 2. Structure, sensing principle, and multidimensional force sensing performance of the bimodal haptic sensor. (A) Design concept of the bimodal haptic sen-
sor. (B) Detailed structure and optical images of the bimodal haptic sensor for dynamic and static multidimensional force sensing, including the top bump-shaped layer
that transmits the stimuli, the sensory piezoelectric and piezoresistive layers, and electrode layers. The sensitivity of bimodal sensors based on (C and D) piezoelectric and
(E and F) piezoresistive mechanisms varies when the applied normal and shear forces range from 0.1 to 7 N. Insets show the measured voltages from piezoelectric and
piezoresistive modules under a loading force of 2 N. The error bars represent ±SD from the mean value (n = 3). (G) Comparison of the sensitivity of our bimodal haptic
sensor with existing tactile sensors (50–62).
loading (i.e., 10°, 40°, and 70°) and found that the bimodal haptic objects at an arbitrary interaction angle. In the application scenario
sensor exhibits a good decoupling accuracy of 90.5% (fig. S10). of intelligent robots, the practical task of gripping objects of differ-
Meanwhile, it is essential to have the capability to detect and dif- ent shapes and sizes is arbitrary for robots and cannot guarantee
ferentiate multidimensional forces while experiencing variable tem- normal orientation, resulting in complexity when applying pressing
perature conditions and mechanical deformation. The importance force that involves both normal and shear forces. As a proof-of-
of this feature originates from the fact that the configuration of in- concept demonstration, when a grape of unknown softness is arbi-
tegrated surfaces and variations in external environmental temper- trarily pressed, the one-dimensional sensory feedback only classifies
atures often affect the response of sensing devices. Here, an increase the softness of the grape as category B based on a single-channel
in temperature leads to an enhancement in the signal output (fig. S11), piezoelectric voltage. The FEA results indicate that this phenome-
which is attributed to the increased dipole moments and charge mo- non occurs due to the presence of additional shear strain in addition
bility. The bimodal haptic sensor would, therefore, need to be calibrat- to the normal strain when the sensor comes into oblique contact
ed or temperature compensated to eliminate temperature effects with the grape, resulting in a higher voltage output compared to
when it is used beyond room temperature. In addition, the bimodal when it is pressed normally against the surface (fig. S14). Conse-
haptic sensor maintains a consistent signal and a good decoupling quently, the robotic manipulator applies a gripping force of 2 N ac-
accuracy (i.e., 86.9%) when mounted on varied surfaces (figs. S12 cording to the classification, resulting in the rupture of the fresh
and S13), indicating the capability to adapt to different mechanical grape (Fig. 3F, I). In contrast to the single information–based soft-
deformations. ness analysis strategy, the three-dimensional force sensor can de-
code the pressing angle (i.e., 15°) and make additional corrections,
Softness measurement strategy combining dynamic and thus accurately classifying the softness and steadily grasping the
static principles fresh grape with a gripping force of 0.5 N (Fig. 3F, III). Meanwhile, a
As the haptic sensor comes into contact with an object in the form of one-dimensional force sensor, used to detect grapes if these grapes
Fig. 3. Softness recognition of the haptic sensor based on dynamic classification and static measurement strategies. (A) Schematic illustration of the softness
recognition approach used by a robotic manipulator using active vibrating motion. (B) Photographs depicting a robotic manipulator touching eight different objects with
varying degrees of softness, including sponge, foam, Ecoflex, PDMS, EVA, PS, rubber, and wood. (C) Real-time piezoelectric outputs and their corresponding voltage peaks
obtained from the piezoelectric mode while touching the eight objects. (D) Relative voltage changes in the piezoresistive mode when the robotic manipulator applies
pressures of 0.5, 2, 5, and 10 N onto the eight objects. (E) Comparison of the elastic coefficients of the measured objects between theoretical predictions and experimen-
tal demonstrations. (F) Comparative experiment involving grape grasping by a robotic manipulator based on (I and III) one-dimensional force and (II and IV) three-
dimensional force sensing feedback. It shows that, with the one-dimensional force feedback, fresh and rotten grapes are damaged and stably grasped by the robotic arm
due to misjudgment of softness. With the decoupled force feedback from the three-dimensional haptic sensor, the fresh grape is stably grasped without damage, while
the rotten grape is given up for grasping.
Fig. 4. Texture discrimination of the haptic sensor assisted with spectrum analysis and deep learning. Schematic illustrations depict the identification of (A) coarse
textures through spectral analysis, while (B) fine textures are recognized using neural network models. (C) Comparison of main frequency from six 3D-printed samples
with spacings ranging from 0.5 to 3 mm between theoretical analysis and experimental demonstrations. (D) Optical images of 15 fabrics with diverse complex patterns.
(E) Schematics of the process and parameters used in constructing the artificial neural networks. Rectified linear unit (Relu) followed by Batch Normalization (BN).
(F) Confusion matrix for machine learning results on 15 fabrics using four channels of feedback. The color bar represents normalized accuracy. (G) Comparison of the
frictional coefficients from touching eight different objects with varying degrees of texture, including sponge, foam, Ecoflex, PDMS, EVA, PS, rubber, and wood.
aperiodic variations in amplitude and spatial intervals. Accurate- transmitted to the computer for machine learning, and the results
ly quantifying textured surfaces requires the identification of were displayed on the computer display interface.
features mediated by the transduction and processing of vi- The surface of the esophageal mucosa exhibits various patterns
brations generated during scanning. To address this challenge, of wrinkling or nonuniformity. The associated elastic modulus can
emerging deep learning algorithms can effectively extract com- be affected by diseases induced by inhomogeneous growth, such as
plex information from elaborated feedback and, although they reflux esophagitis, esophageal hemangioma, Barrett’s esophagus,
rely on a large amount of data, still have the potential to assist in Crohn’s disease of esophagus, and esophageal cancer (68–72). To
identifying fine and irregular textures (Fig. 4B). Fabrics with obtain sufficient esophageal samples for recognition, the simulated
delicate and intricate surface textures were chosen as suitable morphologies of the unhealthy porcine esophagus were used as a
candidates for testing samples (Fig. 4D). A convolutional neural model system because of its ease of availability and similarity to
network (CNN) was developed to effectively extract features the human esophagus. For the purpose of simulating real patho-
from the original complex signals (Fig. 4E). The confusion map logical phenomena with diverse morphologies, we applied me-
demonstrates that the CNN method, using one-dimensional in- chanical stimulation on the surface of the porcine esophagus to
formation, enabled the manipulator to achieve a texture recogni- create particular characteristics resembling various clinical condi-
tion accuracy above 54.55% (fig. S16). Notably, an improvement tions (Fig. 5B). The recognition process was executed to ensure
in recognition accuracy to 92.17% was achieved by incorporat- controllable and repeatable sliding, and these robotic sliding ac-
ing features learned from three-dimensional feedback (Fig. 4F). tions were repeated 50 times. The obtained data of each status were
By integrating haptic feedback from different dimensions, a more then used for training (80%) and testing (20%) and labeled accord-
comprehensive set of features related to slip adhesion and geomet- ing to classes. After training by the CNN (fig. S17), the accuracy
ric deformation from the measured objects could be obtained, thus for clinical feature identification reached 98.44% (fig. S18).
effectively enhancing recognition accuracy. The demonstration in- To explore the real-time clinical feature identification ability of
Fig. 5. Medical application of clinical feature identification by the bimodal haptic sensor and the interactive interface. (A) Schematic illustration of the clinical
feature identification system, containing the signal output information of haptic sensor, multichannel acquisition, signal processing on central processing unit (CPU),
wireless transmission, and real-time display modules. (B) Optical images of porcine esophagus with diverse textures and softness, associated with different pathological
features (i.e., reflux esophagitis, esophageal hemangioma, Barrett’s esophagus, Crohn’s disease of esophagus, and esophageal cancer). (C) Real-time presentation of the
computer interface showcasing the results of clinical feature recognition.
Fig. 6. Agricultural application of the bimodal haptic sensor on intelligent picking white strawberries. (A) Schematic illustration of a robotic manipulator integrated
with the bimodal sensor for grasping white strawberries via the softness and texture perception. (B) Processes of the robotic manipulator grasping white strawberries with
unknown maturity. (I) Optical image of potted white strawberries. Without the sensing feedback, the picked strawberries suffer from the problem of (II) unripe or (III) dam-
age during grasping. An enlarged optical image reveals the validation of a sweetness meter to quantitatively measure the strawberry’s sweetness, represented by Sucrose
Equivalent (SE). Equipped only with feedback functions for softness recognition, the robotic manipulator (IV) bypasses unripe strawberries and (V) carefully picks ripe
ones within maximum force to avoid damage, but occasionally, its gentle grip causes the strawberries to slip. (VI) With softness and texture feedback, the robotic ma-
nipulator executes the prepressing, vibration knocking, and slipping motions to achieve stable grasping. (C) Measurements of piezoelectric and piezoresistive outputs,
providing softness and texture feedback, were obtained from the bimodal sensor during the intelligent picking of white strawberries. (D) Success rate of recognizing and
picking a large number of white strawberries with different shapes and sizes.
robotic manipulator to demonstrate the task of grasping white its compact size, accurately detects three-dimensional forces with
strawberries of indeterminate ripeness (movie S3). The softness high sensitivity (fig. S20) and excellent stability (fig. S21). Multidi-
feedback from the recognition result prompts the robotic manipula- mensional sensors of various sizes have broad potential applications
tor to bypass this unripe strawberry, and instead, it vibrates and and can be tailored to specific needs to ensure appropriate volumes.
knocks a different one (Fig. 6B, IV). After recognizing a mature We believe that integrating the haptic sensor into moving compo-
strawberry, the robotic manipulator reduces its gripping force for nents and mobile devices, such as prosthetics, robotic fingers,
the task, but the strawberry slips due to insufficient force to over- and minimally invasive surgery instruments, would greatly benefit
come the drag (Fig. 6B, V). many fields.
To further demonstrate the ability of our bimodal sensor with
softness and texture sensing feedback in grasping challenges, the
intelligent robot works by the following steps (Fig. 6B, VI, and DISCUSSION
movie S4): (i) The robotic manipulator performs a preload motion In summary, this paper reports a methodology for simultaneously
over the white strawberry, acquiring data through both piezoelec- quantifying material softness and texture using a bimodal haptic
tric, which generates an instantaneous signal upon contact, and sensor, enabling precise elastic and frictional coefficients measure-
piezoresistive sensors, the latter producing a continuous voltage ments via the synergistic effect of three-dimensional static and dy-
response (Fig. 6C). (ii) The further knocking action implemented namic stimuli feedback. The proposed softness recognition method,
by the robotic manipulator induces periodic fluctuations in piezo- using piezoelectric predictive classification and piezoresistive quan-
electric (peak value: 147 mV) and piezoresistive sensing signals, titative detection, provides scarless assessment from various touch
leading to the classification of the white strawberry’s softness as cat- angles, overcoming the difficulties of damage and accuracy that are
egory C and determining a maximum gripping force of 5 N. (iii) commonly encountered in standard static and dynamic softness
Upon the softness recognition, the robotic manipulator executes a measurements. The texture identification approach elucidates the
d33 tester (ZJ-6A of the Chinese Academy of Sciences) at room powered by a signal from a high-precision network data analyzer
temperature. that was amplified by a power amplifier. The force magnitude input
to the sensor was measured by a calibrated piezoelectric force trans-
Preparation of the flexible piezoresistive film ducer with a sensitivity of 10 mV N−1, and the output from this
For the initial synthesis, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (Aladdin transducer was processed through a charge amplifier before record-
Tech. Inc.), sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate surfactant, SiO2 ing on a high-precision network data analyzer. The electrical output
nanoparticles, and the silane coupling agent KH-560 were com- of the piezoresistive sensor was measured through a semiconductor
bined with cyclohexane in a weight ratio of 5:10:3:2:1000. The mix- parameter analyzer (4200-SCS, Keithley). The analyzer was config-
ture was mechanically stirred at 90°C for 20 min to achieve a ured as a current supply, delivering a bias current to the sensor. This
uniform solution. Subsequently, GD401 silicone rubber was added setup enabled the measurement of voltage changes resulting from
to the cyclohexane solution to form a hybrid mixture, which was the inherent resistance variation in piezoresistive sensors. Compres-
vigorously stirred for 30 min. This mixture was then combined in a sion and tensile tests were conducted using a mechanical testing sys-
beaker and sonicated for 30 min, followed by mechanical stirring tem (Legend2345, Instron).
for 1 hour to ensure uniform dispersion. After the mixed suspen-
sion transformed into a viscous solution, it was transferred to a
vacuum drying oven for 10 min to eliminate air bubbles. Supplementary Materials
The PDF file includes:
Supplementary Text
Fabrication of the bimodal three-dimensional force sensor
Figs. S1 to S22
Gold electrodes (150 nm in thickness) were evaporated onto a Tables S1 to S4
100-μm-thick PI film using an electron beam evaporator (DZS-500) Legends for movies S1 to S4
to create the distributed electrodes. The piezoelectric layer (thick-
15. S. Li, G. Liu, R. Li, Q. Li, Y. Zhao, M. Huang, M. Zhang, S. Yin, Y. Zhou, H. Tang, L. Wang, 39. X. Yu, H. Wang, X. Ning, R. Sun, H. Albadawi, M. Salomao, A. C. Silva, Y. Yu, L. Tian, A. Koh,
G. Fang, Y. Su, Contact-resistance-free stretchable strain sensors with high repeatability C. M. Lee, A. Chempakasseril, P. Tian, M. Pharr, J. Yuan, Y. Huang, R. Oklu, J. A. Rogers,
and linearity. ACS Nano 16, 541–553 (2022). Needle-shaped ultrathin piezoelectric microsystem for guided tissue targeting via
16. S. M. Won, H. Wang, B. H. Kim, K. Lee, H. Jang, K. Kwon, M. Han, K. E. Crawford, H. Li, Y. Lee, mechanical sensing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 165–172 (2018).
X. Yuan, S. B. Kim, Y. S. Oh, W. J. Jang, J. Y. Lee, S. Han, J. Kim, X. Wang, Z. Xie, Y. Zhang, 40. S. Chun, W. Son, H. Kim, S. K. Lim, C. Pang, C. Choi, Self-powered pressure-and
Y. Huang, J. A. Rogers, Multimodal sensing with a three-dimensional piezoresistive vibration-sensitive tactile sensors for learning technique-based neural finger skin. Nano
structure. ACS Nano 13, 10972–10979 (2019). Lett. 19, 3305–3312 (2019).
17. C. Shi, Z. Zou, Z. Lei, P. Zhu, W. Zhang, J. Xiao, Heterogeneous integration of rigid, soft, 41. H. Yao, W. Yang, W. Cheng, Y. J. Tan, H. H. See, S. Li, H. P. A. Ali, B. Z. H. Lim, Z. Liu, B. C. K. Tee,
and liquid materials for self-healable, recyclable, and reconfigurable wearable Near-hysteresis-free soft tactile electronic skins for wearables and reliable machine
electronics. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd0202 (2020). learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 25352–25359 (2020).
18. J. Zhang, H. Yao, J. Mo, S. Chen, Y. Xie, S. Ma, R. Chen, T. Luo, W. Ling, L. Qin, Z. Wang, 42. C. Mu, Y. Song, W. Huang, A. Ran, R. Sun, W. Xie, H. Zhang, Flexible normal-tangential force
W. Zhou, Finger-inspired rigid-soft hybrid tactile sensor with superior sensitivity at high sensor with opposite resistance responding for highly sensitive artificial skin. Adv. Funct.
frequency. Nat. Commun. 13, 5076 (2022). Mater. 28, 1707503 (2018).
19. Y. Qiu, C. Wang, X. Lu, H. Wu, X. Ma, J. Hu, H. Qi, Y. Tian, Z. Zhang, G. Bao, H. Chai, 43. Y. Li, M. Zhao, Y. Yan, L. He, Y. Wang, Z. Xiong, S. Wang, Y. Bai, F. Sun, Q. Lu, Y. Wang, T. Li,
J. Song, A. Liu, A biomimetic drosera capensis with adaptive decision-predation behavior T. Zhang, Multifunctional biomimetic tactile system via a stick-slip sensing strategy for
based on multifunctional sensing and fast actuating capability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, human-machine interactions. Npj Flex. Electron. 6, 46 (2022).
2110296 (2021). 44. S. Shu, Z. Wang, P. Chen, J. Zhong, W. Tang, Z. L. Wang, Machine-learning assisted
20. F. Wang, P. Jin, Y. Feng, J. Fu, P. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, Y. Yang, A. Yang, X. Feng, electronic skins capable of proprioception and exteroception in soft robotics. Adv. Mater.
Flexible Doppler ultrasound device for the monitoring of blood flow velocity. Sci. Adv. 7, 35, e2211385 (2023).
eabi9283 (2021). 45. K. Kim, M. Sim, S. H. Lim, D. Kim, D. Lee, K. Shin, C. Moon, J. W. Choi, J. E. Jang, Tactile
21. Y. Qiu, Y. Tian, S. Sun, J. Hu, Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, A. Liu, H. Cheng, W. Gao, W. Zhang, H. Chai, avatar: Tactile sensing system mimicking human tactile cognition. Adv. Sci. 8, 2002362
H. Wu, Bioinspired, multifunctional dual-mode pressure sensors as electronic skin for (2021).
decoding complex loading processes and human motions. Nano Energy 78, 105337 46. H. Qiao, S. Sun, P. Wu, Non-equilibrium-growing aesthetic ionic skin for fingertip-like
(2020). strain-undisturbed tactile sensation and texture recognition. Adv. Mater. 35, e2300593
22. X. Zhao, Z. Zhang, L. Xu, F. Gao, B. Zhao, T. Ouyang, Z. Kang, Q. Liao, Y. Zhang, Fingerprint- (2023).
64. F. Zhang, P. C. Ma, J. X. Wang, Q. Zhang, W. Feng, Y. W. Zhu, Q. B. Zheng, Anisotropic 72. R. Ishii, K. Ohata, R. Sawada, N. Takeuchi, M. Kurebayashi, R. Inamoto, S. Takayanagi,
conductive networks for multidimensional sensing. Mater. Horiz. 8, 2615–2653 Y. Kimoto, M. Nohara, B. Liu, R. Negishi, Y. Minato, T. Muramoto, Successful esophageal
(2021). endoscopic submucosal dissection with intraoperative release of stenosis due to
65. R. Li, B. Peng, Implementing monocular visual-tactile sensors for robust manipulation. previous endoscopic submucosal dissection scarring. DEN Open 2, e87 (2022).
Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022, 9797562 (2022). 73. Y. Yu, K. Zhang, H. Liu, L. Yang, D. Zhang, Real-time visual localization of the picking points
66. J. Zhu, J. Y. Li, Y. Tong, T. Q. Hu, Z. Q. Chen, Y. Xiao, S. H. Zhang, H. B. Yang, M. Gao, T. S. Pan, for a ridge-planting strawberry harvesting robot. IEEE Access 8, 116556–116568 (2020).
H. Y. Cheng, Y. Lin, Recent progress in multifunctional, reconfigurable, integrated liquid
metal-based stretchable sensors and standalone systems. Prog. Mater. Sci. 142, 101228 Acknowledgments: We thank B. Li and G. Xu for participation in the discussions about clinical
(2024). feature identification. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science
67. L. Li, X. Li, B. Ouyang, H. Mo, H. Ren, S. Yang, Three-dimensional collision avoidance Foundation of China (grant nos. 12372168, 12202388, 32101119, 52205031, and 12350003),
method for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 4, 0042 (2023). Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. LQ22A020009 and
68. B. Cha, H. Kim, V. Truong, S. J. Oh, S. Jeong, H. W. Kang, Feasibility study on endoscopic LR20A020002), and the “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang (grant no.
balloon-assisted laser treatment (EBLT) of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 2023C01051). Author contributions: Conceptualization: Y.Q., K.S., and H.W. Methodology: Y.Q.,
in vivo porcine model. Biomedicines 11, 1656 (2023). F.W., Zhuang Zhang, M.X., H.C., J.W., and M.Q. Investigation: F.W., K.S., J.L., A.L., Y.S., and H.J.
69. J. H. Lee, H. J. Chun, B. Keum, E. S. Kim, Y. T. Jeen, A case of esophageal hemangioma Visualization: Y.Q., Zheng Zhang, K.S., J.L., M.X., and W.Z. Writing–review and editing: Y.Q., H.J.,
treated with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 85, 1093–1094 and H.W. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
(2017). Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are
70. S. Liu, S. Peng, M. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Li, Multimodal integration for Barrett’s esophagus. present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
iScience 27, 108437 (2024).
71. R. V. Rodrigues, M. Sladek, K. Katsanos, C. J. van der Woude, J. Wei, S. R. Vavricka, N. Teich, Submitted 4 March 2024
P. Ellul, E. Savarino, M. Chaparro, D. Beaton, A. M. Oliveira, M. Fragaki, A. B. G. Shitrit, Accepted 20 June 2024
L. Ramos, K. Karmiris, E. C. Investigators, Diagnosis and outcome of oesophageal Crohn’s Published 24 July 2024
disease. J. Crohns Colitis 14, 624–629 (2020). 10.1126/sciadv.adp0348