0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Zero trust

Uploaded by

Sanna Ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Zero trust

Uploaded by

Sanna Ali
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Zero-trust security architecture deep

dive
TLDR; Zero Trust Security is a modern approach to cybersecurity that requires
continuous verification and validation of users and devices, regardless of their location
or network. Microsoft Azure's implementation of Zero Trust Security through tools like
Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) and Multifactor Authentication (MFA) ensure that
access is granted based on strict policies and continuous risk assessments. Other cloud
identity providers, such as Google Cloud Identity and Okta, also offer robust Zero Trust
solutions tailored to their respective platforms.

What is Zero Trust Architecture?


Zero Trust architecture is a security model based on the principle of "never trust, always
verify”, where every access request is rigorously verified before granting entry.
Unlike traditional security models that rely on border-focused defenses, Zero Trust
assumes that threats may exist both outside and inside the network. Therefore, it
emphasizes continuous verification of users, devices, and applications before granting
access to resources.

We’ll learn in detail about it later in the blog but first, let’s know a little about its history.

History
Zero Trust architecture emerged in response to the advancements of cyber threats and
the limitations of traditional security models. It originated from the realization that the
traditional border-focused defenses, which assume trust within the network perimeter,
are no longer effective in today's dynamic and distributed computing environments.

The concept of Zero Trust architecture was popularized by Forrester Research analyst
John Kindervag in 2010. Kindervag introduced the idea as a “radical departure” from
traditional security models, proposing for a model based on the principle of "never trust,
always verify." He emphasized the need to challenge the default trust assumptions
within networks and to verify the identity and security position of all users, devices, and
applications attempting to access resources, regardless of their location.

While Kindervag played a significant role in promoting the Zero Trust concept, it was
further developed and refined by various cybersecurity experts, organizations, and
government agencies over time. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security
Agency (CISA) has been fundamental in shaping Zero Trust principles and providing
guidance for its implementation. CISA's publication of the Zero Trust Maturity Model
and the establishment of the Zero Trust Architecture Working Group have contributed
to the widespread adoption and evolution of Zero Trust architecture.

Zero trust model by CISA


The Zero Trust model, as outlined by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure
Security Agency (CISA), is a security approach aimed at improving safeguards
against cyber threats.

Principle of Least Privilege:


Users are granted only the minimum level of access required to perform their
tasks. This minimizes the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive information or
resources.
Continuous Authentication:
Users and devices are continuously verified to ensure their legitimacy before
accessing resources. Authentication factors such as passwords, biometrics, or
multi-factor authentication (MFA) are used to validate identities.
Network Segmentation:
The network is divided into smaller, isolated segments to contain potential
security breaches. Access controls are applied based on the specific needs of
application workflows, rather than trusting the entire network.
Device Integrity:
Devices accessing resources are assessed to ensure they meet predefined
security standards. This includes checks for up-to-date software patches,
antivirus protection, and adherence to security policies.
Data-Centric Security:
Data is classified, categorized, and encrypted to protect it from unauthorized
access or exfiltration. Access controls are based on factors such as user identity,
device compliance, and data sensitivity.
Real-Time Monitoring:
Continuous monitoring and analytics are used to detect and respond to security
threats promptly. Behavioral analytics and irregular detections help identify
suspicious activities and potential security breaches.
Adaptive Access Controls:
Access to resources is actively adjusted based on changing risk factors, such as
user behaviour or threat intelligence. This ensures that access privileges are
continuously reassessed to mitigate security risks.
Principles of Zero Trust
Terminate All Connections:
Zero Trust architecture ensures that each connection is terminated, enabling real-time
inspection of all traffic, including encrypted traffic, before reaching its destination.
Unlike traditional methods, which passively inspect traffic, Zero Trust employs an
inline proxy architecture for active monitoring and analysis.
Protect Data with Contextual Policies:
Zero Trust policies are based on contextual factors like user identity, device, location,
content type, and application. These policies continually access requests and rights,
adapting to changes in context.
Minimize Risk by Reducing Attack Surface:
Zero Trust directs users to connect directly to applications and resources, bypassing
networks to eliminate the risk of lateral movement and prevent compromised devices
from affecting other resources. This approach also hides users and applications from the
internet, reducing exposure to discovery and targeted attacks.

What is the difference between Zero Trust Architecture


and Zero Trust Network Access?
Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) outlines the comprehensive strategy for achieving
stringent security measures within an organization. It involves implementing strict
access controls, authenticating users, and securely segmenting resources.

On the other hand, Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is a specific implementation
of Zero Trust principles. It focuses on securely providing users with access to
applications and data, regardless of their location or the traditional network boundaries.
ZTNA allows organizations to extend secure access to resources beyond the limitations
of the traditional network perimeter, catering to the demands of remote work and cloud
computing environments.

Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) is necessary for companies to effectively implement


Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). ZTA provides the foundational principles and
framework for implementing stringent security measures, such as strict access controls,
continuous authentication, and data segmentation. Without ZTA, organizations may
struggle to establish the necessary security to support ZTNA effectively.
Implementation of Zero Trust in Azure: Microsoft's
Approach with EntraID Protection
Microsoft has implemented the Zero Trust model in its Azure cloud platform to ensure
strong security measures for its users. One of the key components of Microsoft's Zero
Trust strategy in Azure is EntraID Protection, which includes various features designed
to verify identities and secure access to Azure resources. Following are the features used
by Microsoft:

Azure Active Directory Identity Protection: Azure Active Directory (AAD)


Identity Protection is a vital tool in Microsoft's Zero Trust approach. It uses machine
learning algorithms to detect suspicious activities in order to prevent identity-based
attacks and unauthorized sign-ins. By continuously analysing user behaviours and sign-
in patterns, Identity Protection can identify suspicious activities and risky sign-ins,
helping to reduce potential security threats.

Conditional Access Policies: This tool allows organizations to define access


policies based on various parameters such as user identity, device health, location, and
sensitivity of the accessed resources. By enforcing these policies, Conditional Access
ensures that only authorized users and devices can access Azure resources, thus
reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.

Multi-Factor Authentication: Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra


layer of security to Azure resources by requiring users to provide additional verification
beyond just a password. This could include biometric authentication, one-time
passcodes, or hardware tokens. By implementing MFA, Microsoft enhances the
security of Azure environments, making it more durable to credential-based attacks and
unauthorized access attempts.

Continuous Monitoring and Risk Assessment: Microsoft's Zero Trust


approach in Azure also prioritizes continuous monitoring and risk assessment to identify
and address security threats. Through tools like “Azure Security Centre” and “Azure
Monitor”, organizations can gain real-time visibility into their Azure environments,
monitor for suspicious activities, and assess the overall security state. By staying
responsive to potential threats, organizations can effectively mitigate risks and maintain
a secure Azure ecosystem.

Integration with Threat Intelligence: Microsoft integrates threat intelligence


capabilities into Azure to enhance its Zero Trust security measures. By utilizing insights
from global threat intelligence sources, Azure can proactively identify emerging threats
and vulnerabilities, allowing organizations to take quick actions to safeguard their Azure
data.

Overall, Microsoft uses different tools and methods to keep Azure safe and help
organizations keep their data safe from cyber threats.

Exploring Zero Trust Implementation in Cloud Identity


Providers
Cloud identity providers play a key role in implementing Zero Trust principles by
ensuring secure access to cloud resources while minimizing the risk of unauthorized
access. Let's have a look at some notable examples of Zero Trust implementation in
leading cloud identity providers.

Google Cloud Identity:


Google Cloud Identity is renowned for its reliable Zero Trust capabilities, allowing
organizations to enforce strict access controls and improve security measures

Example: Context-Aware Access Google Cloud Identity implements Context-Aware


Access, allowing organizations to define access policies based on a variety of contextual
factors such as user identity, device security status, and location. For instance, an
organization can create a policy that gives access to highly sensitive data storage only to
users accessing from trusted devices within designated geographical locations. This
control minimizes the risk of unauthorized access attempts and strengthens overall
security.

Okta Identity Cloud:


Okta Identity Cloud is a leading identity and access management solution provider,
offering Zero Trust capabilities to reduce security risks effectively

Example: Okta's Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) actively adjusts


authentication requirements based on contextual factors such as user behaviour, device
posture, and location. If a user attempts to access a critical application from an
unfamiliar device or location, Okta may ask for additional authentication factors such as
biometric verification or one-time passcodes. This approach to MFA enhances security
by ensuring that access is granted only to authenticated users under optimal security
conditions.
AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM):
Amazon Web Services (AWS) IAM offers comprehensive identity and access
management capabilities, including robust Zero Trust features to safeguard cloud
resources.

Example: IAM Policies with Conditions AWS IAM allows organizations to create
precise access control policies with conditions customized to specific use cases.
Organisations can define IAM policies that restrict access to sensitive AWS resources
based on contextual factors such as IP address, time of access, or user attributes.

Microsoft Azure Active Directory (AAD):


Microsoft Azure Active Directory (AAD) is the basis of identity and access
management in the Azure cloud ecosystem, offering sturdy Zero Trust capabilities to
safeguard Azure resources.

Example: Conditional Access Policies Azure AD Conditional Access enables


organizations to define access policies based on contextual factors such as user identity,
device health, and location. Companies can implement policies that require multi-factor
authentication (MFA) for accessing sensitive Azure resources from unmanaged devices
or non-compliant devices. Additionally, organizations can configure policies to restrict
access to Azure resources based on risk levels detected by Azure Identity Protection.

How to implement Zero Trust in your system?


The implementation of Zero Trust as a first-time user can be broken down into four
easy steps:

Secure Your Workforce: Make sure your employees can work securely from
anywhere by enabling multi-factor authentication (MFA), Virtual private networks
(VPNs) and Zero trust network access (ZTNA)

Protect Your Data in the Cloud: Keep your data safe, even when it's stored in the
cloud. You can do this by using Data loss prevention (DLP) policies, Cloud access
security brokers (CASBs) and regularly auditing your data.

Update Your IoT/OT Security: Make sure all your connected devices are secure by
including intrusion detection systems (IDS) and intrusion prevention systems (IPS).

Securely Connect with Customers and Suppliers: Use secure file transfer protocols
like SFTP or HTTPS to exchange data with customers or suppliers and only
communicate using secure communication protocols like transport layer security (TLS)
or secure socket layers (SSL)

By tackling each of these steps, you'll gradually build a Zero Trust system that securely
connects users, devices, and applications, no matter where they are.

How Zero Trust Architecture Has Brought Change:


I think it goes without saying that Zero trust has changed the cybersecurity world and
introduced security measures which are helping organizations all over the world to
protect themselves to an extent that was impossible earlier.

Shift from Perimeter-based to Identity-centric Security: Zero Trust focuses on


verifying the identity of users, devices, and applications regardless of their location,
thereby reducing reliance on perimeter defences.

Enhanced Security Posture: By implementing continuous authentication, least


privilege access, and micro-segmentation, organizations can strengthen their security
posture and minimize the risk of data breaches.

Improved User Experience: Despite its rigorous security measures, Zero Trust
architecture aims to enhance user experience by providing seamless access to resources
based on contextual factors such as user identity and device health.

Adaptation to Modern IT Environments: With the rise of cloud computing, remote


work, and mobile devices, Zero Trust architecture offers a flexible and scalable security
framework that adapts to the evolving needs of modern IT environments.

Disadvantages of Zero Trust and Solutions:


There can be some complexities or downsides to the Zero trust but it’s nothing that
can’t be solved.

Complexity: Zero Trust can be complex, especially for organizations with many users.
Solution: Partner with a security vendor specializing in Zero Trust for effective
implementation.

Mindset Shift: Zero Trust requires a change in how IT and security teams think about
security.
Solution: Educate teams on its model to facilitate understanding and adoption.
Manpower Requirement: Zero Trust may need more manpower to manage multiple
perimeters.
Solution: Partner with a security vendor/outsource security to streamline
implementation and reduce internal roles.

Application Performance: Zero Trust can slow down applications due to


authentication requirements.
Solution: Invest in adaptive access control models to dynamically manage access based
on risk profiles.

Cost: Implementing Zero Trust can be costly due to additional security measures.
Solution: Security partners can help identify cost-effective solutions and prevent costly
breaches.

Productivity Impact: Zero Trust may hamper productivity due to increased security
measures.
Solution: Invest in user-friendly Zero Trust solutions and conduct audits to ensure
access to necessary tools.

Despite challenges, Zero Trust remains the best security model. By addressing these
disadvantages, organizations can successfully implement Zero Trust and enhance their
security posture.

Conclusion
Zero Trust is becoming essential for security because traditional security methods aren't
reliable anymore with cloud computing and remote work. Zero Trust keeps up with
modern work styles by having strict rules for who can access what, constantly watching
everything, and focusing on protecting data. This makes the security stronger and more
flexible against both insider threats and advanced cyberattacks.

You might also like