The Role of Internet in Marketing Strategies
The Role of Internet in Marketing Strategies
Abstract
The use of the Internet has increased in recent years remarkably. Conducting
business in the digital economy means using Web- based systems on the Internet and
other electronic networks to do some form of electronic commerce. Many research
findings confirm and support being of positive effects of Internet on an enterprise's
competitive advantage. In this paper, I will illustrate that enterprises can acquire
relational and informational competency through Internet technology, and based on
these competencies they can succeed in competitive cyber markets. According to the
Internet competencies, Internet marketing strategies can be divided into five categories:
Transactional, Profile, Customer-oriented, Relationship, and Knowledge strategies.
Choosing and implementing any category of strategies depends on the degree of
internet competencies (informational and relational) that a firm has. When both are
high, proper internet marketing strategy seems to be knowledge strategies; and when
both are low, transactional internet marketing strategies would be the suitable
category.
1. Introduction
Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009 Review of International Comparative Management 816
exchange platforms. Similar evolutions took place with the introduction of
automobiles and telephones that reduced the need for channel immediacy.
The use of Internet has become increasingly popular in recent years, where
the cost of accessing and building on Internet and web site is relatively low
[Ranchhod et.al, 2000]. Companies employ the World Wide Web to gather and
disseminate information to and from actual and potential customers and
increasingly for end-consumer business transactions through electronic commerce
[Romano, 2002].
As McFarlane (1984), Porter and Millar (1985) and Cash and Konsynski
(1985) explained; Since the beginnings of the computing era, Information
Technology [IT] has suggested that the implementation of computing technologies
would have a serious positive effect on the enterprise. These authors assert that
Internet technology may serve as a strategic tool, which has a potential effect in
any of porter's competitive strategies [Obra, et.al, 2002].
Some of the research results do not entirely support the academic literature
which assumes to be a net positive effect of the Internet on the competitive
advantage of the enterprise [Obra, et.al, 2002].
According to resource-based Theory, Internet technology could not be as a
source of sustainable competitive advantage, because Internet is imitable and it is
not rare. Therefore, companies must identify their competitive advantage and then
develop an Internet marketing strategy for success in the Internet markets. The
authors believe that companies should understand their core competencies in the
Internet markets then develop their Internet marketing strategies. Internet is a tool
for marketing and creating competencies, and it could not be a competency or
source of sustaining competitive advantage itself.
2. Literature review
Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009 Review of International Comparative Management 817
concentrates on examining the achievement of advantages for physical outputs in
terms of effectiveness, and then the market space offers improvement potentials, in
two ways [Weiber and Kollman, 1998]:
Increase in effectiveness through the acquisition of information.
Increase in effectiveness through the transfer of information.
Internet marketing entails using the Internet to provide information, to
communicate and to conduct transactions. The Internet is a ubiquitous information
platform, allowing internal and external customers to reduce costs for both firms
and customers. Therefore, the companies can act as topical-leaders or speed-leaders
in the market space.
Teo et al [2002] argued that for achieving overall growth for the company,
we could set online marketing strategies in five categories: To attract, To engage,
To retain, To learn, To relate.
In the new competitive environment, it is increasingly evident that
successful marketing strategies are based on an amalgam of three critical elements.
These elements include:
Creation of consumer franchise: whereby end-users are attracted to the
product/service because of perceived superior offers.
Strong customer franchise: where intermediaries want to do business
with us because of a tangible economic benefits.
Under-pinning supply chain effectiveness: that delivers superior service
at less cost.
Figure 1 summarizes the three source of marketing advantage through
marketing strategies [Christopher, 1996].
818 Review of International Comparative Management Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009
As figure 2 shows, Internet marketing strategies has been divided into five
categories [Kassaye, 1997]:
Entry strategies
Experimental strategies
Assortment of incremental strategies
Nichiny strategies
Consolidation strategies
Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009 Review of International Comparative Management 819
1. Transitional marketing
2. Relationship marketing:
a. Database marketing
b. Interaction marketing
c. Network marketing
Zineldin [2002] added technological ship marketing to this perspective and
argued that in technological ship marketing customers are considered more
individually and products are customer defined and customer specific. In this
perspective marketing rules continually evolve, driven by technology and market is
borderless by default.
Some of authors argued and explained one-to-one marketing strategy in the
Internet markets [Weng and Liu, 2003; Sharma and Sheth, 2002]. One2one
marketing strategy seems to be necessary to [a] identify customers; [b] differentiate
customers; [c] interact with customers; and [d] personalize products or services to
tailor-suit customers [Wang & Liu, 2003]. Personalization, customization and
recommendation systems are very important in one-to-one marketing strategy.
From company’s point of view, it is decisive to be able to offer and
transfer better information to customers, because this ability can result in obtaining
more and better information about customers than competitors [Weiber &
Kollmann, 1998]. According to Wong et al [2003] this is the co sharing dimension
of information. The term of co-sharing involves information competency and
information sharing. Information competency can be regarded as the ways that
companies process and manage Information they have gained. If companies cannot
be able to manage information system well, they will only get meaningless and
disorganized data and information which are not applicable for company’s decision
making and action taking.
Information sharing is defined as "formal and informal sharing of
meaningful and timely information intra and inter firms". The Information obtained
can assist companies to understand customer's need, wants and desire precisely.
Information Technology (IT) has allowed sellers to tailor “mass
customized” propositions to individual customer through continuous cycle of
dialogues with the customers. As marketers learn more about their customers, they
can use this information to create and propose more value for customers; attract
them to buy the offered products, increase customers’ loyalty, and make long run,
interactive and beneficial relationships. By this way of thinking and acting, it is
expected of companies to protect and enhance their own market share in the
intensively competitive cyber markets.
Companies to achieve information competency should create intellectual
marketing strategies [Seyed Javadein S. R. et al, 2003]. The body of marketing
knowledge is continually evolving [Trim, 2002]. Companies can create marketing
knowledge through intelligence toward their competitive markets. Having
intellectual competency, a company can gather useful information from customers,
competitors and market then it can formulate an effective marketing strategy.
Intelligent marketing is a process of knowing what the competitors are up to and
820 Review of International Comparative Management Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009
staying one step ahead of them, by gathering actionable information about the
competitors and ideally, applying it to short and long-term strategic planning [Wee,
2001].
One of most important sources for information gathering is customer
knowledge that companies should manage it for achieving to core competency.
Customer knowledge is an important asset for all businesses. The data collected at
the customer interface can be translated into business intelligence and customer
knowledge [Rowley, 2002]. Companies can use the Internet to do this, because the
Internet's core advantage lies in its great capacity of fast, efficient, integrated, and
interactive exchange of information [Avlonitis and Karayanni, 2002].
With an increase in usage of the Internet, customer will take an increasing
role in the fulfillment process, leading to “co-creation” process. Co-creation
involves both customers and marketers interacting in aspects of design, production,
and consumption of the product or service [Sharma & Sheth, 2002]. Co-creation
which require applying IT intensively, is a strategic process based on the
philosophy reverse marketing. According to reverse marketing, Internet changes
the focus of marketing from a "supplier perspective" to a "customer perspective".
For example, in reverse marketing price is not a function of cost but cost is a
function of price. In other word, first customers determine their price and then
company should try to produce that at a desired price, so they should use price-
based costing not cost-based pricing.
3. Model development
Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009 Review of International Comparative Management 821
Firms have a major strategic and informational problem (and opportunity) facing of
marketplace heterogeneities in demand (customer preferences) and product supply.
Such opportunism is aided by market orientation which advocates systematic
acquisition, dissemination, and use of information to guide strategy development
and implementation. At a minimum, business strategy involves identifying and
selecting market segments, developing appropriate offerings and assembling the
resources required to produce and deliver the offerings. This in turn requires that
organizations increasingly invest considerable time, energy and money to create
deep and insightful customer knowledge.
Based on the degree of having of these two competencies (currently or in
the future), an enterprise can select and formulate its Internet marketing strategies.
As figure 3 shows, I classified these strategies into five categories:
• Transactional
• Profile-based
• Relational
• Knowledge-based
• Customer-oriented
822 Review of International Comparative Management Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009
Profile-based strategies
Many of companies use some e-tools such as data mining, cookies, etc for
creating a profile for customers. They use customer profiles to conduct marketing
activities flexibly and response to customer needs and satisfy them effectively.
Knowledge-based strategies
Customer-oriented strategies
Conclusion
Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009 Review of International Comparative Management 823
References
824 Review of International Comparative Management Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009
16. Wee, T., (2001). “The Use of Marketing Research and Intelligence in
Strategic Planning: Key Issues and Future Trends”, Marketing Intelligence &
Planning, 19/4: 245-253.
17. Weiber, R., Kollmann, T., (1998). “Competitive Advantages in Virtual
Markets –Perspectives of Information–based Marketing in Cyberspace”,
European Journal of Marketing, and 32/718: 603-615.
18. Weng, S., Liu, M. J., (2003). Feature–based Recommendations for
19. One–to –One Marketing, Expert Systems with Applications, www. Elsevier.
Com/locate/eswa.
20. Wong, Y. H., Leung, T. K., et al., (2003). Beyond Customer Relationship
Management: Information Co-sharing and Relationship Positioning,
Academy of Business & Administrative Sciences, International Conference,
Brussels, Belgium.
21. Zineldin, M., (2000). “Beyond Relationship Marketing: Technological ship
Marketing”, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 18/1: 9-23.
Volume 10, Issue 4, October 2009 Review of International Comparative Management 825