Unit 1: RESEARCH DESIGN

1. Outline the elements of Research Design.

Answer: Research design outlines the systematic approach to conducting research. It
provides a framework for the entire research process, ensuring that the study is carried out
effectively and efficiently. Key elements of research design include:
1. Defining the Research Problem: Clearly and concisely stating the research problem is
crucial. It involves identifying the specific issue or phenomenon to be investigated, providing
a clear context for the study, and justifying its significance.
2. Literature Review: Conducting a thorough review of existing literature is essential. This
involves examining previous research, theories, and scholarly publications related to the
research topic. It helps identify gaps in knowledge, refine research questions, and inform the
research methodology.
3. Formulating Objectives and Hypotheses: Research objectives outline the specific goals
of the study. Hypotheses are testable statements about the expected relationship between
variables. They provide a framework for data collection and analysis.
4. Selecting Research Methodology: Choosing appropriate research methods is critical.
This involves determining the data collection techniques (surveys, interviews, observations,
experiments) and data analysis methods (statistical analysis, qualitative analysis) that best
suit the research question and objectives.
5. Sampling: If the study involves a sample of the population, appropriate sampling
techniques must be employed to ensure representativeness and minimize bias.
6. Data Collection: This involves gathering data using the chosen methods. It is crucial to
ensure data quality and reliability through proper data collection procedures and instrument
validation.
7. Data Analysis: Analyzing the collected data involves organizing, summarizing, and
interpreting the findings. Statistical and/or qualitative analysis techniques are used to draw
meaningful conclusions from the data.
8. Report Writing: The final step involves presenting the research findings in a clear,
concise, and well-structured report. The report should include a summary of the research
problem, methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommendations for future research.
In essence, a well-designed research study ensures that the research process is systematic,
rigorous, and produces valid and reliable results. It provides a roadmap for the researcher,
guiding them through each stage of the investigation and ensuring that the study meets its
objectives.

2. What is 'research design'? Explain the importance of research design.

Answer: Research design is essentially the blueprint or roadmap for a research project. It's
a carefully crafted plan that outlines the key aspects of the study, guiding the researcher
through each stage of the process.
Key Decisions: It involves making crucial decisions about various aspects of the study,
including:
● Research Question: What specific question or issue will the research address?
● Data Needs: What types of data are required to answer the research question
(quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods)?
● Study Purpose: Why is this research being conducted? What are its objectives and
significance?
● Data Sources: Where can the necessary data be found (primary data collection or
secondary data analysis)?
● Study Area: Where will the study be conducted (geographical location, specific
population, etc.)?
● Timeframe: What is the timeframe for the study (duration, specific periods)?
● Sample Selection: How will the sample be selected (sampling methods, sample
size)?
● Data Collection Methods: What techniques will be used to collect data (surveys,
interviews, observations, experiments)?

1
 ● Data Analysis Methods: How will the collected data be analyzed (statistical
analysis, qualitative analysis)?
● Flexibility: While a research design provides a framework, it's not rigid. Researchers
may need to adjust their plans based on unforeseen circumstances or new insights
gained during the study.
Importance of Research Design
● Systematicity: A well-defined research design ensures that the research process is
conducted in a systematic and organized manner.
● Efficiency: It helps to minimize time, effort, and resources by guiding the researcher
through the most efficient path to achieve the research objectives.
● Validity and Reliability: A sound research design enhances the validity and
reliability of the research findings by minimizing potential biases and errors.
● Focus: It helps the researcher stay focused on the research question and avoid
unnecessary detours.
● Communication: A clear research design facilitates effective communication of the
research plan to others, such as supervisors, collaborators, and funding agencies.
● Error Minimization: By anticipating potential challenges and limitations, a
well-designed study helps to minimize the risk of errors and ensure that the research
meets its intended goals.
In essence, a robust research design is crucial for conducting high-quality research. It
provides a solid foundation for the entire research process, ensuring that the study is
well-planned, executed effectively, and produces meaningful and reliable results.
I hope this explanation is helpful!

3. What do you understand by 'research'? Explain different types of research in Social

Sciences.
Answer: Research is a systematic, methodical, and ethical process of inquiry aimed at
solving problems, answering questions, and increasing knowledge. It involves systematic
investigation using scientific methods and is rooted in curiosity. Characteristics of research
include:
● Systematic approach: Critical investigation of phenomena.
● Scientific methodology: Based on empirical evidence and observation.
● Interpretation and explanation: Aims to answer specific questions or solve
problems.
● Provisional outcomes: Open to revisions based on new findings.
Essentials of Scientific Research:
1. Empirical: Data collected through direct observation and field interaction.
2. Systematic: Planned studies rather than random observation.
3. Replicable: Consistent results under similar conditions.
4. Objective: Free from personal biases and subjective beliefs.
5. Provisional: Open to debate and modification.

Types of Research in Social Sciences:

1. Pure or Basic Research:
● Focuses on gaining knowledge for its own sake.
● Generates new ideas, theories, or concepts.
● Example: Developing a new theory about human behavior.
2. Applied Research:
● Aims to address practical problems in society.
● Seeks solutions to issues like terrorism, trafficking, or marital conflicts.
● Example: Studying causes of juvenile delinquency to devise preventive measures.
3. Exploratory Research:
● Conducted to understand new or less-researched phenomena.
● Utilizes small samples and intensive interviews.
● Example: Investigating the cultural practices of an isolated community.

2
4. Experimental Research:
● Studies cause-effect relationships in controlled settings.
● Manipulates independent variables to observe effects.
● Example: Testing how incentives improve work productivity.
5. Descriptive Research:
● Focuses on describing social situations, events, or structures.
● Reports findings accurately without interpretation.
● Example: Describing the demographics of a marketplace.
6. Analytical Research:
● Goes beyond observation to study context, reasons, and implications.
● Example: Analyzing reasons behind income inequality in urban areas.
7. Evaluative Research:
● Assesses the efficacy of policies or programs.
● Evaluates effectiveness, efficiency, and impact.
● Example: Reviewing the impact of a literacy program.
8. Participatory Action Research:
● Involves community members in the research process.
● Aims to bring change in the lives of the studied community.
● Example: Collaborating with villagers to improve sanitation practices.
Research in social sciences employs diverse approaches to enrich knowledge and address
societal challenges effectively.

4. What is research design'? Explain its significance in social science research.

Answer:
A research design is a systematic and strategic blueprint for conducting a study, ensuring
the research process is logical and well-organized. It defines the study's objectives, the data
collection methods, the analysis techniques, and the timeline. In social sciences, it acts as a
foundation to explore and interpret human behaviors, social structures, and cultural
phenomena.
Key elements of research design include:
● Identifying the research problem.
● Deciding the study's geographical scope and timeline.
● Selecting appropriate data collection methods.
● Determining sampling strategies.
● Outlining the analysis techniques.
Significance of Research Design in Social Science Research:
1. Clarity of Objectives:
● Helps define the research problem and objectives clearly.
● Provides a focused approach to answering key questions.
2. Systematic Approach:
● Ensures that research activities follow a logical sequence.
● Reduces the likelihood of errors and inconsistencies.
3. Efficient Resource Management:
● Optimizes the use of time, finances, and other resources.
● Avoids unnecessary duplication of efforts.
4. Enhances Credibility:
● Promotes transparency in the research process.
● Increases the validity and reliability of findings.
5. Anticipates Challenges:
● Identifies potential risks and outlines strategies to address them.
● Allows for better preparation before fieldwork begins.
6. Flexibility and Adaptability:
● Accommodates changes during the research process.
● Enables modifications to address unforeseen issues.
7. Aids in Communication:

3
 ● Serves as a guide for researchers, sponsors, and stakeholders.
● Facilitates better understanding of the study's purpose and scope.
Conclusion: A well-prepared research design is indispensable in social science research
as it ensures a systematic and scientific approach to studying complex social phenomena. It
provides a roadmap for the researcher to achieve meaningful and accurate results while
maintaining ethical and methodological rigor.

4
 Unit 2 : DOING FIELDWORK
1. Discuss the role and responsibility (Ethical Concerns) of fieldworkers towards
people under study.
Answer: Fieldworkers play a crucial role in social research, acting as intermediaries
between the academic world and the communities they study. Their responsibilities are
deeply intertwined with ethical concerns to ensure the safety, dignity, and rights of
participants. Ethical fieldwork begins with obtaining informed consent, wherein participants
are made aware of the research's objectives, methods, potential risks, and benefits. This
consent must be voluntary, ensuring no coercion.

Confidentiality is another key responsibility. Fieldworkers must safeguard participants'

personal information, ensuring that their identities and sensitive details are not exposed in
ways that could harm them socially, economically, or politically. This involves anonymizing
data and securing records.

Respecting cultural norms and practices is vital. Fieldworkers must approach communities
with cultural sensitivity, avoiding any actions or statements that may be offensive or
disruptive. For instance, they should adapt to local etiquettes, dress codes, and
communication styles.

Fieldworkers must also be transparent about their intentions. Misrepresentation of the

research purpose can erode trust and harm the credibility of the study. Researchers should
avoid exploiting participants, ensuring that the research benefits the community or, at the
very least, does not harm them. For instance, if participants share valuable insights,
researchers should reciprocate by sharing findings or assisting them in non-research-related
ways.

Mitigating harm is a paramount responsibility. Fieldworkers should ensure that their activities
do not negatively impact the mental, emotional, or physical well-being of participants. This
includes avoiding intrusive questioning or behaviors that may evoke trauma or discomfort.

Furthermore, fieldworkers have an obligation to ensure the ethical dissemination of findings.

They must present data accurately, avoiding misrepresentation or sensationalism that could
stigmatize individuals or communities.

In summary, the role of a fieldworker extends beyond collecting data. It involves acting as a
responsible and ethical researcher who respects the rights and dignity of participants,
ensuring the study contributes positively to the academic community and society at large.
Ethical fieldwork builds trust, enhances data quality, and fosters a collaborative relationship
between researchers and participants.

2. 'Building rapport and gaining the trust of participants are important aspects of field
work.' Discuss.
Answer: Building rapport and gaining trust are pivotal aspects of fieldwork as they form the
foundation of meaningful and ethical interactions between researchers and participants.
Without trust, participants may withhold valuable information, compromising the depth and
accuracy of the research.

Rapport refers to the relationship of mutual understanding and respect between the
researcher and the participants. This relationship facilitates open communication, enabling
participants to share their perspectives, experiences, and insights without fear of judgment
or exploitation. For instance, in ethnographic studies, researchers must immerse themselves
in the community, participate in daily activities, and adopt culturally appropriate behavior to
foster connections.

5
Trust-building involves several components, including honesty, transparency, and respect for
the participants’ culture and values. Researchers must clearly explain their research
objectives, how the data will be used, and the potential benefits or risks involved.
Misrepresentation or hidden agendas can erode trust and damage the researcher-participant
relationship.

Cultural sensitivity is also critical. Researchers should respect local customs, traditions, and
hierarchies. For example, in hierarchical societies, approaching community leaders or
gatekeepers first may be necessary to gain access and establish credibility. Adapting to local
communication styles, such as learning the language or understanding non-verbal cues, can
further enhance rapport.

Consistency in behavior is another crucial factor. Researchers should maintain their

commitments, such as meeting participants at agreed times or sharing preliminary findings.
Unfulfilled promises can create mistrust and negatively impact the research.

The benefits of building rapport extend beyond ethical considerations. A strong rapport often
leads to richer, more detailed data as participants feel comfortable sharing personal or
sensitive information. It also helps researchers navigate complex social dynamics within the
community, such as conflicts or hidden power structures.

In conclusion, building rapport and gaining trust are not merely procedural steps in fieldwork
but essential practices that underpin ethical and effective research. They require patience,
cultural awareness, and genuine respect for participants, ensuring that the research process
is collaborative and mutually beneficial.

3. In what way can researchers develop rapport with people they study?
Answer: Developing rapport is a foundational step in conducting successful fieldwork. It
involves creating a relationship of trust and mutual understanding with participants, enabling
open communication and cooperation. This process requires sensitivity, patience, and
adaptability on the researcher’s part.

One way to develop rapport is by demonstrating cultural sensitivity and respect.

Researchers should familiarize themselves with local customs, traditions, and social norms.
For example, learning the local language or dialect can significantly enhance communication
and show a genuine interest in the community. Respect for cultural practices, such as
greeting styles or dress codes, also plays a vital role in building trust.

Engaging in everyday activities with participants is another effective strategy. By participating

in their routines, researchers can break down barriers and present themselves as equals
rather than outsiders. This approach helps participants see the researcher as approachable
and sincere. For instance, sharing meals, attending local events, or assisting in communal
tasks can strengthen bonds.

Transparency about the research purpose is crucial. Researchers must explain the goals,
methods, and potential benefits of the study in a way that participants can understand. Being
honest about what the research entails and how the findings will be used ensures that
participants feel valued and respected.

Another critical factor is consistent and ethical behavior. Keeping promises, such as meeting
participants at agreed times or respecting confidentiality, reinforces trust. If a researcher
commits to returning results or sharing findings, they must follow through to avoid damaging
the relationship.

6
Listening actively and empathetically also fosters rapport. Researchers should show genuine
interest in participants’ experiences and perspectives. Avoiding judgment and maintaining an
open-minded attitude encourages participants to share information freely.

Lastly, identifying and collaborating with key informants or gatekeepers can facilitate
smoother entry into the community. These individuals often act as intermediaries, vouching
for the researcher’s intentions and easing initial skepticism.

In summary, developing rapport requires a combination of cultural sensitivity, transparency,

active participation, and ethical conduct. By investing time and effort into building genuine
relationships, researchers can create a conducive environment for meaningful and
productive fieldwork.

4. In what way can a researcher develop rapport with informants in fieldwork?

Answer: Building rapport with informants is critical for collecting rich and reliable data during
fieldwork. Informants, as key sources of information, require a relationship based on trust
and mutual respect for successful collaboration.

One of the most effective ways to build rapport is by approaching informants with humility
and genuine interest. Researchers should avoid any sense of superiority and treat
informants as equals. Demonstrating curiosity and respect for their knowledge and
experiences fosters a positive dynamic.

Learning the local language or familiarizing oneself with cultural nuances is equally
important. By communicating in the informant’s native tongue or adopting their
conversational norms, researchers can bridge cultural gaps. This effort often makes
informants feel valued and more willing to share insights.

Transparency about the research is essential. Researchers should clearly explain the
objectives, methods, and potential outcomes of the study. Informants are more likely to trust
researchers who are honest about their intentions and how the information will be used.

Participating in shared activities is another effective strategy. Whether it’s joining daily
routines, attending cultural events, or helping with tasks, such engagement allows
researchers to bond with informants naturally. It also provides opportunities to observe and
understand informants’ perspectives in context.

Listening attentively and empathetically enhances rapport. Researchers should encourage

informants to speak freely and show genuine appreciation for their contributions. Avoiding
judgment and maintaining a neutral stance on sensitive topics ensures that informants feel
safe sharing information.

Ethical conduct is paramount. Researchers must respect informants’ privacy, honor their
wishes regarding confidentiality, and avoid exploiting their knowledge or time. Fulfilling
promises, such as sharing findings or compensating informants for their efforts, reinforces
trust.

In conclusion, rapport with informants is cultivated through respect, transparency, active

participation, and ethical behavior. By creating a relationship based on mutual
understanding, researchers can access deeper insights and ensure a more collaborative and
rewarding fieldwork experience.

7
5. Ethical issues involved in the practice of fieldwork.
Answer: Ethical issues in fieldwork are critical to ensure the dignity, rights, and well-being of
participants. Researchers must navigate complex situations while adhering to ethical
principles such as informed consent, confidentiality, and cultural sensitivity.

Informed Consent: Participants must be fully informed about the research purpose,
methods, and potential risks or benefits before agreeing to participate. Consent should be
voluntary, and researchers must respect a participant’s right to withdraw at any point.

Privacy and Confidentiality: Protecting participants’ personal information is essential.

Researchers must anonymize data and ensure that sensitive details are not disclosed in
ways that could harm individuals or communities. Breaches of confidentiality can lead to
mistrust and unintended consequences.

Avoiding Harm: Researchers must ensure that their activities do not harm participants
physically, emotionally, or socially. For example, probing sensitive topics could evoke
trauma, while publicizing private information might damage reputations or relationships.

Cultural Sensitivity: Understanding and respecting local norms and values are vital.
Researchers should avoid behaviors or language that could be perceived as offensive.
Missteps in cultural sensitivity can strain relationships and compromise data quality.

Exploitation: Researchers must avoid exploiting participants’ time, knowledge, or resources

for personal or professional gain. Reciprocity, such as sharing findings or providing benefits
to the community, helps mitigate this issue.

Impact on Future Research: Ethical lapses can damage the trust between researchers and
the community, hindering future studies. Researchers should strive to leave a positive legacy
that encourages openness to subsequent inquiries.

In summary, ethical considerations in fieldwork ensure the protection and respect of

participants while fostering trust and collaboration. Adherence to these principles is essential
for producing meaningful and responsible research.

6. Key concerns in conducting ethnographic fieldwork

Answer: Ethnographic fieldwork involves several challenges and concerns that researchers
must address to ensure successful and ethical data collection.
● Gaining Access: Securing entry into the community or site is often the first hurdle.
Researchers may need the approval of gatekeepers or community leaders. Building
trust with participants is essential to gaining full access.
● Cultural Sensitivity: Researchers must respect local customs, traditions, and
hierarchies. Misunderstanding or disregarding cultural norms can create friction and
affect data collection.
● Building Rapport: Establishing trust and a positive relationship with participants is
crucial. Researchers should demonstrate empathy, patience, and genuine interest in
participants’ lives to encourage openness.
● Maintaining Objectivity: Researchers must be aware of their biases and strive to
maintain neutrality. Reflexivity—acknowledging and managing one’s influence on the
research—is vital to ensure valid findings.
● Ethical Considerations: Ensuring informed consent, safeguarding confidentiality,
and avoiding harm are critical. Researchers must navigate ethical dilemmas carefully
to uphold participants’ rights.
● Data Collection Challenges: The unstructured nature of ethnographic methods,
such as participant observation and interviews, requires adaptability. Researchers
may face difficulties balancing immersion with objectivity.

8
 ● Impact of Research: Researchers must be mindful of how their presence and
findings might affect the community. Ethical dissemination of results and giving back
to the community can mitigate negative consequences.
In conclusion, addressing these concerns requires a combination of preparation, adaptability,
and ethical commitment, ensuring the research is respectful, responsible, and insightful.

Unit 3: ETHICS IN SOCIAL RESEARCH

1. Discuss the main ethical considerations in Social Research.
Answer:
1. Informed Consent
● Participants must voluntarily agree to participate with full understanding of the
research, risks, and benefits.
● Researchers should disclose the purpose of the study, data usage, risks, and privacy
protection in an informed consent form.
● Participants must give consent freely without coercion and can withdraw at any time.
● Deception in research is unethical unless justified and disclosed later.
● Observation studies without consent should only occur in public spaces, without
identifying individuals, and when critical to science or public health.

2. Vulnerability of Research Participants

● Vulnerable populations include minors, prisoners, and economically or educationally
disadvantaged groups.
● Additional protections, such as guardian consent for minors, are required for these
groups.
● Researchers must ensure informed consent for vulnerable populations is fully
understood and avoid coercive incentives.
● Ethical principles like respect, privacy, and mutual participation must be upheld,
especially for those with imbalanced power dynamics.
3. Anonymity and Confidentiality
● Anonymity involves concealing participant identities, while confidentiality concerns
restricting access to their data.
● Researchers should use pseudonyms and anonymized data to protect identities.
● Sensitive information should only be recorded with participant consent.
● Proper procedures for data storage, such as enfiles, are crucial to safeguard
confidentiality.
● Risks of re-identification, especially with linked datasets, must be minimized.
4. Conflict of Interest
● Conflicts arise when researchers or institutions have competing interests, such as
financial or institutional benefits.
● Transparency is essential to ensure the research's integrity and respect for
participants.
● Institutions should avoid conflicts, such as sponsoring projects or benefiting from
intellectual property.
5. Integrity and Transparency
● Researchers must use funds responsibly and follow institutional ethical guidelines.
● All stages of research, from design to analysis, should be transparent and
documented.
● Researchers must avoid contracts contingent on predetermined outcomes or
guaranteed response rates.
● Transparency ensures credibility, trust, and societal value by providing data for
informed decision-making.
Ethical considerations in social research are fundamental to ensuring participant protection,
research integrity, and public trust.

9
2. Discuss the issue of objectivity and value neutrality in social research.
Answer:
1. Objectivity in Social Research
Definition: Objectivity refers to the ability to collect and analyze data without bias or
value-based judgments, ensuring conclusions are independent of personal beliefs,
preferences, or prejudices.
Challenges: Researchers may unconsciously allow biases (e.g., towards language, religion,
caste) to affect their data collection and interpretation, leading to inaccurate findings.
Avoiding Discrimination: Researchers must avoid perpetuating discrimination during the
research process.
Durkheim’s Perspective: Émile Durkheim emphasized eliminating preconceptions and
treating social facts as things, free from subjective influence.
Weber’s Contribution:
● Advocated for "value-free sociology" where sociologists deal only with facts and
remain neutral on values.
● Proposed that researchers distinguish between "what is" (facts) and "what ought to
be" (values).
● Highlighted the need to objectively assess actions and practices without taking sides.
2. Weber’s Method of Interpretative Understanding ("Verstehen")
Interpretative Understanding: Social scientists should understand human actions by
probing the subjective meanings actors attach to their behavior.
Qualitative Approach: Unlike natural scientists who study phenomena from an external
perspective, sociologists act as insiders to grasp human motives and feelings.
Steps in Analysis:
● Step 1: Visualize and interpret actors' motivations and feelings.
● Step 2: Conduct causal analysis to explain the reasons behind social phenomena.
3. Value Neutrality in Social Research
Definition: Value neutrality is the practice of remaining impartial and avoiding bias during
the study and when publishing results.
Ethical Obligations:
● Researchers must report findings truthfully, even if they contradict personal beliefs,
predictions, or societal norms.
● They should strive to overcome personal biases during data analysis.
Weber’s View:
● Researchers should ensure personal values do not influence their interpretations.
● Emphasized maintaining impartiality while analyzing and presenting data.
● Advocated separating facts from personal opinions to achieve neutrality.
4. Importance in Sociology
● Ensures that research accurately reflects social reality.
● Builds credibility and trust in social sciences by avoiding misrepresentation of data.
● Helps researchers provide objective insights into societal practices and behaviors.
In conclusion, maintaining objectivity and value neutrality in social research is crucial for
ensuring accuracy, credibility, and unbiased analysis of social phenomena.

3. 'Anonymity and confidentiality of research participants are central to ethical

research practice.’Discuss
Answer:
1. Definition of Anonymity and Confidentiality
● Anonymity: Concealing the identities of participants in all research documents,
ensuring that individuals cannot be identified from the data.
● Confidentiality: Refers to controlling who has access to the data provided by
participants and safeguarding it from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure.

2. Centrality in Ethical Research

10
 ● Ensuring anonymity and confidentiality builds trust between the researcher and
participants.
● These principles protect the integrity of the research process by assuring participants
their personal information will remain secure and untraceable.
3. Ethical Duty of Confidentiality
● Researchers must safeguard sensitive data from unauthorized access, modification,
or loss.
● Fulfilling this duty reinforces ethical standards and respect for participants’ privacy.
4. Respecting Participants’ Views
● Researchers must respect participants’ refusal to share personal information if they
feel it invades their privacy.
● Privacy should also be respected when studying groups without their knowledge or
consent.
5. Methods to Preserve Anonymity and Confidentiality
● Use of Pseudonyms: Replace participants' names with pseudonyms in all research
outputs.
● Anonymized Data: Remove or modify personal identifiers in datasets, ensuring that
new information cannot be linked to individuals.
● Secure Data Storage: Implement strict procedures for storing sensitive data such as
audio recordings, interview transcripts, and survey responses.
6. Technological Challenges
● Advances in data storage and analysis have increased the risks of re-identifying
participants, especially when linking datasets or studying individuals in small
populations.
● Researchers must employ robust measures to mitigate these risks and ensure
participants’ data remains untraceable.
7. Professional Standards and Codes of Conduct
● Many professional organizations have established ethical guidelines regarding data
collection, use, and disclosure.
● Adherence to these codes ensures that participants’ privacy is respected and
protected.
8. Importance in Research
● Anonymity and confidentiality are crucial for maintaining participants’ trust and
willingness to participate.
● Protecting participants' identities ensures that they are not exposed to potential harm,
stigma, or discrimination due to their involvement in the research.
Conclusion: Anonymity and confidentiality are foundational principles of ethical research
practice. By safeguarding participants’ privacy and ensuring their data is protected,
researchers uphold ethical standards, build trust, and contribute to the integrity and
credibility of the research process.

4. Importance of ethics in social research.

Answer:
1. Human Focus in Social Research
Unlike natural sciences, social research primarily deals with human beings as the source of
data, whether through surveys, observations, or experiments.
This human element requires researchers to approach their subjects with sensitivity,
ensuring no harm is done to participants.

2. Ethical Considerations Across Research Stages

Ethics must be integrated at all stages of research, from problem selection to data collection,
analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results.
Researchers should ensure ethical practices beyond obtaining informed consent, guiding the
entire research process.

11
3. Responsibility to Stakeholders
Social researchers are accountable to multiple stakeholders, including research participants,
funding bodies, colleagues, and society at large.
The researcher’s ethical conduct impacts the well-being of participants, the integrity of the
research, and its contribution to knowledge.

4. Minimizing Harm and Maximizing Benefit

Ethical research aims to maximize the benefits of the study while minimizing risks or harm to
participants.
Potential risks must be mitigated through precautions to safeguard participants' well-being.

5. Independence and Transparency

Maintaining independence in research is crucial to ensure the findings are unbiased and not
influenced by external factors such as funding or political pressures.
Any conflicts of interest should be disclosed clearly, ensuring transparency throughout the
research process.

6. Ethics in Reporting and Use of Results

The results of social research contribute to existing knowledge and can influence policy
decisions.
Unethical research practices could lead to misleading findings that affect policy-making and
public opinion, making ethical conduct essential for reliable results.

7. Ethical Responsibility to Research Teams

Researchers are ethically responsible for the well-being of their research teams.
This includes ensuring fair compensation, a supportive working environment, and resolving
dilemmas where research goals conflict with the team’s welfare.

8. Confidentiality of Informants
Social researchers face ethical dilemmas regarding the protection of informants' identities.
The decision to reveal or conceal informants' identities is a critical ethical issue, especially
when informants face potential harm or exposure from revealing personal details.

9. Ethical Dilemmas in Data Presentation

Ethical issues also arise when presenting data, particularly when informants provide
sensitive information.
Researchers must balance the potential benefits of publishing certain data with the ethical
obligation to protect the confidentiality and well-being of informants.

10. Consequences of Unethical Research

Research that does not adhere to ethical standards can mislead the public, harm
participants, and discredit the research community.
Ethical research ensures accountability and responsible dissemination of findings, which
contributes to the integrity of social science research.

### Conclusion
Ethics in social research is essential to ensure that the study is conducted responsibly,
respects participants’ rights, and contributes meaningfully to society without causing harm.
Ethical guidelines help researchers navigate complex issues, ensuring research benefits
both the participants and the broader community.

5. Ethical Code of Conduct

Answer:
1. Background and Purpose

12
The concern for ethics in research emerged due to controversies around improper research
conduct.
In response, Ethical Codes, Guidelines, Conventions, and Declarations were established at
national and international levels to ensure ethical integrity in research.
Professional organizations use these codes to ensure the integrity of their discipline, protect
subjects' welfare, and guide researchers in ethical dilemmas.

2. Role of Professional Associations

Professional associations, such as the American Sociological Association (ASA) and the
Social Research Association (SRA), have prescribed ethical codes of conduct.
These codes guide researchers in making ethical decisions and provide direction when
confronted with ethical challenges.
Ethical codes aim to safeguard the research participants, maintain professional integrity, and
support responsible conduct in research.

3. American Sociological Association (ASA) Code of Ethics

The ASA's Code of Ethics outlines principles and ethical standards for sociologists'
professional conduct.
It serves as a guideline for sociologists in their professional activities and addresses
common issues they may face.
Basic Principles of ASA Code (1997 Revision):
Maintain objectivity and integrity: Sociologists must conduct research impartially, ensuring
no bias.
Respect the subject's rights: Researchers must respect participants' privacy and dignity.
Protect subjects from harm: Researchers must safeguard participants from any physical,
emotional, or psychological harm.
Preserve confidentiality: Researchers must keep participants' data confidential and secure.
Seek informed consent: Researchers must obtain informed consent from participants
before collecting data.
Acknowledge research collaborations: Collaboration and assistance must be
acknowledged.
Disclose financial support: All sources of funding must be disclosed to avoid conflicts of
interest.

4. Conflict of Interest
The ASA Code highlights the issue of conflict of interest, where personal or financial
interests could compromise research objectivity.
Sociologists must avoid situations where their personal or financial stakes influence their
professional judgment.

5. Social Research Association (SRA) Code of Ethics

The SRA's ethical guidelines emphasize responsibilities toward society, funders, colleagues,
and research subjects.
Basic Principles of the SRA Code:
Obligations to Society: Researchers must conduct studies that benefit society, maintaining
high scientific standards.
Obligations to Financiers and Employers: Researchers should maintain a clear, balanced
relationship with funders, ensuring that research integrity is not compromised.
Obligations to Colleagues: Researchers must uphold professional behavior, making
methods, procedures, and findings open for collegial review.
Obligations to Subjects: Researchers must protect subjects from harm, ensure voluntary
participation, and provide informed consent.

6. Ethical Codes as Frameworks

13
Ethical codes provide a framework for researchers but cannot impose rigid rules due to
diverse economic, cultural, legal, and political settings.
Researchers may have different moral principles guiding their work based on these varying
contexts.
Ethical codes offer guidance, but individual researchers must use their judgment to apply
these principles in their work.

7. Conclusion
Ethical codes play a crucial role in guiding social researchers in their professional conduct.
They ensure the well-being of participants, uphold the integrity of the research process, and
help researchers navigate complex ethical dilemmas in their studies.

6. American Sociological Association

Answer: :
1. Background of Ethical Codes in Research
Ethical codes in research emerged due to concerns about improper research practices.
These codes codify commonly practiced ethical norms at national and international levels to
maintain integrity, define expected behavior, and protect research subjects.
They also help researchers navigate ethical dilemmas and ensure responsible conduct.

2. American Sociological Association (ASA)

The ASA's Code of Ethics outlines the principles and ethical standards for sociologists'
professional conduct.
First published in 1971, the code was revised in 1997 to address emerging ethical
challenges.
It serves as a guide for sociologists in their everyday professional activities, ensuring ethical
responsibility in research practices.

3. Principles of the ASA Code of Ethics

Objectivity and Integrity: Sociologists are required to maintain objectivity and integrity in their
research by avoiding bias and ensuring the validity of their findings.
Respect for Privacy and Dignity: Researchers must respect participants' privacy and dignity
throughout the research process.
Protection from Harm: Sociologists must ensure that their research does not cause harm to
participants. The safety and well-being of subjects must be prioritized.
Confidentiality: Researchers are obligated to preserve the confidentiality of data and
information collected from participants.
Informed Consent: Sociologists must obtain informed consent from participants before
collecting data or observing their behavior, ensuring they are fully aware of the research
context.
Acknowledgement of Collaboration: Researchers must acknowledge any research
collaboration or assistance received during their work.
Disclosure of Financial Support: All sources of financial support for the research should be
disclosed to avoid any conflicts of interest.

4. Revised ASA Code (1997)

The 1997 revision emphasizes the ethical responsibility of sociologists in serving the public
good and avoiding harm to individuals or groups studied.
The revised code addresses challenges arising from researchers' personal objectives,
including conflicts of interest.

5. Conflict of Interest
The ASA Code stresses the importance of addressing conflicts of interest, which arise when
sociologists' personal or financial interests compromise their professional judgment and
objectivity.

14
Sociologists are required to disclose and address any potential conflicts of interest to
maintain the integrity of their work.

6. Basic Principles of the Social Research Association (SRA) Code of Ethics

Obligations to Society: Social researchers must conduct their work responsibly, ensuring
their research benefits society and adheres to moral and legal standards.
Obligations to Financiers and Employers: Researchers must maintain a balanced and
transparent relationship with funders and employers, ensuring that professional integrity is
not compromised.
Obligations to Colleagues: Professional conduct should be maintained within the research
community, ensuring the safety and security of colleagues, especially during fieldwork.
Obligations to Subjects: Researchers must protect subjects from harm, ensure voluntary
participation, and make sure that no group is excluded from consideration without
justification.

7. Diversity in Ethical Application

Social researchers work in diverse economic, cultural, legal, and political contexts, which
influence the ethical focus of their research.
Ethical codes provide a flexible framework, but they must be adapted according to different
settings and the moral precepts of researchers.

8. Conclusion
Ethical codes, such as the ASA Code of Ethics, ensure that sociological research is
conducted with integrity and respect for participants' rights and welfare.
These codes offer guidelines for sociologists but also require researchers to use their
judgment in applying ethical principles, ensuring that research benefits society while
minimizing harm.

15
 Unit 4: UNIT 4 SAMPLING
1. Explain different methods of drawing a sample.

Methods of Drawing a Sample

Sampling is the process of selecting a subset from a population to infer its characteristics.
Various methods are employed depending on the study's objective and population
characteristics:

1. Probability Sampling

This method ensures each population unit has a known, non-zero chance of selection,
minimizing bias and enhancing representativeness. Common techniques include:

a. Simple Random Sampling (SRS):

● Each unit has an equal chance of being selected.

● Can be done with or without replacement.
● Methods include:
○ Lottery Method: Population units are numbered and drawn randomly.
○ Random Number Table (RNT): Numbers are selected using pre-generated
random number sequences.
● Advantages include simplicity and unbiased selection, though it may be inefficient for
large populations.

b. Systematic Sampling:

● A random starting point is selected, followed by every kkk-th unit based on a

calculated interval.
● Example: To select 100 units from 1,000, kkk = 10.
● It is quicker but can lead to biases if the population exhibits periodicity.

c. Stratified Sampling:

● Population is divided into homogeneous strata, and random samples are taken from
each.
● Types:
○ Proportional: Samples are proportional to stratum sizes.
○ Disproportional: Larger samples are taken from strata with greater
variability.
● It ensures better representation and precision, especially for heterogeneous
populations.

d. Cluster Sampling:

● Population is divided into clusters (e.g., geographical regions), and some clusters are
sampled randomly.
● All units within chosen clusters are surveyed.
● Cost-effective for large populations but may lack precision due to cluster
homogeneity.

e. Multistage Sampling:

16
 ● Combines multiple probability methods across stages.
● Example: Select districts (clusters), then schools (strata), and finally students
randomly.
● Ideal for complex or widespread populations.

2. Non-Probability Sampling

This method relies on researcher judgment and convenience, often leading to selection bias.
It is suitable for exploratory research or when probability sampling is impractical.

a. Convenience Sampling:

● Based on ease of access to units.

● Common in preliminary research.
● Quick and inexpensive but often lacks representativeness.

b. Judgment Sampling:

● Researcher selects units based on expertise and study relevance.

● Example: Selecting cities representative of national demographics.
● Useful but depends on the researcher’s judgment, risking bias.

c. Quota Sampling:

● Population is divided into groups based on characteristics like age or income.

● A fixed number of units are selected from each group.
● Proportional and non-proportional variants exist, but this method often relies on
convenience for selection.

d. Snowball Sampling:

● Participants are asked to refer others meeting the criteria.

● Useful for hard-to-reach populations, such as marginalized groups.
● Results may lack generalizability.

3. Mixed Sampling

● Combines probability and non-probability methods.

● Example: Shortlist participants using judgment sampling, then apply random
sampling for final selection.

These methods vary in complexity, cost, and precision. Probability sampling is ideal for
representative and reliable results, while non-probability methods are useful in specific
contexts like exploratory studies or resource constraints. The choice of method depends on
the study's objectives, population characteristics, and practical considerations​.

17
2. What is stratified random sampling? Explain the advantages and disadvantages of
Stratified Sampling.

Stratified Random Sampling

Stratified random sampling is a probability sampling method where the population is divided
into smaller, homogeneous subgroups called strata based on specific characteristics (e.g.,
age, gender, income). Within each stratum, a random sample is drawn to ensure
representation.

This method is particularly useful when the population is heterogeneous and contains
distinct groups that differ significantly concerning the characteristic of interest.

Process of Stratified Sampling:

1. Define the Population: Clearly identify the entire population.

2. Divide into Strata: Separate the population into non-overlapping strata based on
specific criteria.
3. Determine Sample Size: Decide the total sample size and the proportion to be
drawn from each stratum.
○ Proportional Sampling: Sample size for each stratum is proportional to its
size in the population.
○ Disproportional Sampling: Sample size for each stratum depends on its
variability and study needs.
4. Select Samples: Use random sampling methods (e.g., SRS or systematic sampling)
within each stratum.
5. Combine Samples: Combine the selected units from all strata into a single sample.

Advantages of Stratified Random Sampling

1. Improved Representativeness:
○ Ensures that all significant subgroups in the population are represented in the
sample.
○ Especially useful for heterogeneous populations with diverse characteristics.
2. Higher Precision:
○ Reduces sampling error by focusing on homogeneous strata.
○ Yields more accurate and reliable estimates than simple random sampling.
3. Flexibility:
○ Allows researchers to analyze specific subgroups individually and compare
their characteristics.
4. Efficiency in Resource Use:
○ Smaller sample sizes may be needed to achieve the same level of precision
compared to other methods.
5. Fair Representation of Small Strata:
○ Ensures that smaller or minority groups are adequately represented in the
sample.

Disadvantages of Stratified Random Sampling

1. Requires Detailed Population Data:
○ Accurate stratification requires prior knowledge about the population’s
characteristics, which may not always be available.
2. Complexity in Execution:

18
 ○ Dividing the population into strata and ensuring random selection within each
stratum can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.
3. Risk of Improper Stratification:
○ Errors in stratification (e.g., overlapping or poorly defined strata) can lead to
biased results.
4. Costly and Labor-Intensive:
○ Preparation, such as listing and separating population units into strata, can be
expensive and challenging.
5. Difficulty in Defining Criteria:
○ Deciding the most relevant criteria for stratification can be subjective and vary
across studies.

Stratified random sampling is a powerful method for ensuring representation and precision in
research. However, its effectiveness depends on careful planning, appropriate stratification,
and sufficient resources.

3.What is a random sampling method? How is a simple random sample selected?

Random Sampling Method

Random sampling is a probability sampling technique where every unit in the population has
an equal chance of being selected in the sample. It ensures unbiased representation,
making it ideal for drawing valid and reliable inferences about a population. Random
sampling minimizes selection bias and provides a foundation for statistical analysis.

Simple Random Sampling (SRS)

Definition:
Simple random sampling is the most basic form of random sampling where each unit in the
population has an equal probability of being selected. It can be done with replacement
(SRSWR) or without replacement (SRSWOR):

● With Replacement (SRSWR): A selected unit is returned to the population, allowing

it to be chosen again.
● Without Replacement (SRSWOR): A selected unit is removed, and it cannot be
chosen again.

Steps to Select a Simple Random Sample

1. Define the Population:
○ Clearly specify the group from which the sample will be drawn.
○ Example: The population of students in a university.
2. Assign Numbers to Units:
○ Each unit in the population is assigned a unique identification number.
3. Choose a Random Selection Method:
○ Lottery Method:
■ Write the numbers of all population units on identical slips of paper.
■ Mix the slips in a container thoroughly.
■ Randomly draw the required number of slips for the sample.
■ Example: Selecting 50 employees out of 500 by drawing their
numbers.
○ Random Number Table (RNT):

19
 ■Assign numbers sequentially to all population units.
■Use a table of random numbers to select units corresponding to those
numbers.
■ Example: Use the last two digits of random numbers to select students
from a class of 100.
○ Computer-Generated Random Numbers:
■ Software like Excel or statistical tools generates random numbers
quickly, making it practical for large populations.
4. Collect the Sample:
○ Extract the units corresponding to the selected numbers and include them in
the sample.

Advantages of Simple Random Sampling

1. Unbiased Selection:
○ Each unit has an equal chance of selection, eliminating selection bias.
2. Simplicity:
○ Easy to understand and execute, especially for small populations.
3. Statistical Validity:
○ Allows for accurate generalizations about the population when the sample
size is sufficient.
4. Compatibility with Statistical Analysis:
○ Facilitates the calculation of sampling errors and confidence intervals.

Limitations of Simple Random Sampling

1. Population Homogeneity Requirement:
○ Works best when the population is homogeneous in terms of the
characteristic under study.
2. Resource-Intensive for Large Populations:
○ Assigning numbers and ensuring randomness can be time-consuming for
large datasets.
3. Sampling Frame Dependence:
○ Requires a complete and accurate list of the population units, which may not
always be available.

Simple random sampling is a fundamental and widely used method for achieving unbiased
representation in research, making it a cornerstone of statistical sampling​

Q.What is sampling process.

The Sampling Process

The sampling process involves systematically selecting a subset of units from a larger
population to infer the population's characteristics. It is a critical step in research, ensuring
that the sample accurately represents the population, minimizing errors, and making data
collection efficient.

20
Key Steps in the Sampling Process
1. Define Survey Objectives:
○ Clearly outline the purpose of the survey and the questions it aims to answer.
○ Example: Determining consumer preferences for a new product.
2. Define the Target Population:
○ Specify the group about which conclusions are to be drawn.
○ Example: For a study on family planning, the target population might be
married couples in a specific age group.
3. Identify the Sampling Frame:
○ Create a list or operational definition of the population. This could be a
database, a registry, or a physical list.
○ Note: Errors in the sampling frame (e.g., incomplete or outdated lists) can
lead to sampling bias.
4. Select a Sampling Method:
● Choose between probability sampling (e.g., simple random, stratified, systematic)
or non-probability sampling (e.g., convenience, quota, snowball).
● The choice depends on the study’s goals, population characteristics, and available
resources.
5. Determine the Sample Size:
● Decide how many units are needed for reliable and valid results. Factors to consider
include:
○ Desired precision and confidence level.
○ Population variability.
○ Budget and time constraints.
6. Select Sampling Units:
● Apply the chosen method to select units (e.g., individuals, households, or
businesses) from the sampling frame.
● Example: Randomly selecting 1,000 respondents from a list of registered voters.
7. Data Collection and Processing:
● Gather information from the selected units using tools like surveys, interviews, or
observations.
● Check for incomplete or inconsistent responses and clean the data.
8. Data Analysis:
● Use statistical tools to analyze the data, ensuring the results align with the study's
objectives.
9. Publish and Disseminate Results:
○ Present findings in reports or publications, highlighting implications and
recommendations.
○ Example: Sharing survey results on public health awareness in a seminar.

Importance of the Sampling Process

● Efficiency: Reduces the time, cost, and effort compared to surveying the entire
population.
● Accuracy: Ensures a representative sample, minimizing errors and bias.
● Generalizability: Allows researchers to draw valid conclusions about the population
based on the sample.

By following a structured sampling process, researchers can ensure that their findings are
robust, reliable, and meaningful​

21
Systematic Random Sampling Procedure
Systematic random sampling is a probability sampling technique where the first sample unit
is selected randomly, and subsequent units are chosen at fixed intervals. This method is
commonly used for its simplicity and ease of implementation when a complete list of the
population is available.

Advantages of Systematic Random Sampling

1. Simplicity and Efficiency:
○ Easier to implement than simple random sampling, especially for large
populations.
○ Requires minimal effort once the interval and starting point are determined.
2. Uniform Coverage:
○ Ensures an evenly distributed sample across the population.
3. Faster Execution:
○ Reduces time and cost compared to other sampling methods.
4. Practical in Fieldwork:
○ Useful when a list of population units is unavailable but sequential access
(e.g., individuals visiting a bank) is possible.
5. Combines with Other Methods:
○ Can be paired with stratified or cluster sampling for greater precision.

Disadvantages of Systematic Random Sampling

1. Risk of Bias with Periodicity:
○ If the population exhibits periodic patterns, the sample may not be
representative.

22
 ○Example: Selecting every 10th unit might miss certain subgroups if units are
arranged cyclically.
2. Dependence on the First Unit:
○ The choice of the initial unit affects the entire sample, potentially introducing
bias.
3. Less Randomness:
○ Unlike simple random sampling, not every unit has an equal chance of being
selected after the first unit.
4. Assumes a Complete List:
○ Requires a well-ordered and complete list of the population, which may not
always be available.

Systematic random sampling is a practical and efficient method for selecting samples,
especially for large, evenly distributed populations. However, its effectiveness depends on
the absence of periodicity in the population and the randomness of the initial selection

23
 UNIT 5 CENSUS AND SURVEY

1. What is the census? Uses of census.

Answer: 5.2 CENSUS
Let us discuss certain basic issues related to census.
5.2.1 What is Census?
Census refers to the complete enumeration of a universe. A universe may be a
place or a specific locality, a group of people, or objects/ elements of interest
from which data is collected. The population of a census can vary according to
the focus or need of the research. A census is an attempt to list all
elements/units/members in a group and to measure one or more characteristics of
those elements/units/members. The most common are census of with national
population, housing census other types of census include agriculture, animal,
business, farms, cars from an assembly line, traffic censuses and so on. Census is
a quantitative research method and the data collected is analyzed with the use of
statistics.
Box 5.1 Census Moment
Census in most countries of the world is conducted in years ending in 0 or 1. In
India, the census is conducted in years ending in 1. International comparability is
thus maintained. Usually, a day as well as “census moment” is fixed for the
census. In India, the “census moment” now is the sunrise of 1st March, of the
census year. The fixing of the “census moment” helps the enumerators to decide
which persons are to be included in the census. The persons born after the census
moment or the persons dying before the census moment are to be excluded from
the census.
Source: https://censusindia.gov.in/Data_Products/Library/Indian_perceptive
_link/Census_Objectives_link/censusobjectives.htm)
While the size of the population under consideration is dependent on area of
research and can thus vary (in size), being a quantitative method census usually deals with
large numbers. One of the major advantages of census method is
accuracy as each and every unit of the population is studied before drawing any
conclusions of the research. When more and more data are collected the degree
of correctness of the information also increases. Thus the results based on this
method are also expected to be less biased. Data collected through census method
allows opportunity for intensive study and analysis due to the enormity of the
data collected.
Today, census is well recognised for its advantages for maintaining national level
demographic figures, which are comparable on a periodic scale, regionally,
nationally as well as internationally. Let us try to understand census better using
the example of population census. A population census covers each person
present and/or residing within its scope, without omission or duplication in the
order to ensure completeness and accuracy of census data. The total population
enumerated refers to one well defined point or period of time. The population
figures have no meaning unless they refer to a well-defined territory. The
territory covered, along with any changes in its area in successive censuses thus
needs to be clearly and explicitly stated. A census can provide detailed
information on all or most elements in the population, thereby enabling totals for
rare population groups or small geographic areas. Thus a population census is the
process of collecting, compiling, analyzing and disseminating demographic,
social, cultural and economic data relating to all persons in the country, at a
particular time in regularised intervals.
Box 5.2 History of Census in India
The history of census in India is compiled in Drop-in Article on Census- No. 5.
The following account in drawn from the above mentioned source available at:
censusindia.gov.in/Ad-Campaign/drop-in-articles/05-History of Census-in-

24
India/pdf)
India has a long tradition of conducting census every ten years. The mention of
some kind of population count during 800-600 BC is found in the Rig Veda.
Written about 321-296 BC, Kautilya’s Arthashastra laid stress on Census taking
as a measure of state policy for the taxation purpose. The administrative report
‘Ain-eAkbari’ offered extensive data on population, industry, wealth etc. during
the reign of Mughal ruler Akber the Great. In the year 1830, Henry Walter in
Dacca conducted the first complete census of an Indian city. In this census
following characteristics were included: sex, broad age group and houses with
their amenities. The census of 1881 undertaken on February 17, 1881 by W.C.
Plowden, Census Commissioner of India was a major step towards modern
census. The first census of India after Independence was conducted in 1951
which was seventh in the series. In the present day, Census is conducted by the
office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India, Ministry of
Home Affairs, Government of India.
To conduct a population census, vast organisation and considerable resources
(financial, logistical, managerial etc.) are needed. The census organisation has tomobilize
extensive administrative machinery with adequate legislative authority. Census and Survey
This can be done only by National Government with the cooperation of States
and Local Governments.
5.2.2 Uses of Census Data
Modern census data are commonly used for research and future projections;
administrative policy and planning; business and marketing, and planning as a
baseline for designing sample surveys by providing a sampling frame. Census
also brings out the heterogeneity in a population this helps in understanding the
stratification of the population into subgroups, as well as recognizing the
weightage that each group deserves based on related parameters.
Let us take a look at how census information can be utilized by taking the
example of the Indian population census. As discussed earlier, the census in India
is conducted every 10 years, Office of the registrar general and the Census
commissioner of India, (https://censusindia.gov.in/Data_Products/Library/
Indian_perceptive_link/Census_Objectives_link/censusobjectives.htm), provides
a detailed description of the objectives, essentials and utility of census, let us look
at some of these in terms of the ways in which the information collected is
utilized.
(i) Projections and Research: Country-wide data on in terms of the urban-
rural areas, geographic dispersion according to occupation, education, sex
and age, economic characteristics and, social structure of population etc.
analysis of the composition, distribution, and growth of the population
accurate (both over a period of time as also projection for future). The
changing patterns of various population distributions are provided by
population census. Such appraisal is important for research and practical
problems of national, industrial and commercial growth and management.
Census data serve as the baseline for computing various indicators. For
example, census results, time-adjusted by migration statistics, can provide
estimates of the future size, distribution and other characteristics of the
population of the total country and sub-national areas. Or census data on
fertility can provide a bench-mark check on the reliability of current birth
statistics. Thus, census data can be utilized for making projections for the
future as well as crosschecking the previous projections with factual reality.
(ii) Administration, Policy and Planning: One of the most basic of the
administrative uses of census data is in the demarcation of constituencies
and the allocation of representation on governing bodies. Detailed
information on the geographic distribution of the population is indispensable
for this purpose.

25
Demographic and economic characteristics of the population collected
through census are essential for evaluation of economic and social problems,
which must precede the determination of policy affecting economic and
social development.
Collection
Businesses and industries can effectively use census data to make reliable
estimates of consumer demand for variety of goods, commodities and
services, based on the population or social group that they cater to. The
information from census feeds into operational research providing for
demand related to housing, furnishing, clothing, recreational facilities,
medical supplies and so forth. Further, the local availability of labour for
production and distribution of commodities can be easily determined by the
use of census data.
(iii) Recognising the heterogeneity of the population: Census provides the
official counts used to assign the number of elected representatives to
regions. The social and cultural data collected in the census is employed to
determine the total number of seats to be reserved for women, members of
scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other socially marginal groups in the
House of People and the Legislative Assemblies of the States.
(iv) Census as frame for Sample Surveys: Size of populations as also other
characteristics of the population. This makes its necessary to conduct regular
inter-census sample survey. These surveys provide updated and detailed data
on many characteristics that are usually investigated in population census
conducted intervals of ten years.
Box 5.3 Essential features of Census
It is a quantitative research method.
It advocates a systematic, standardized data collection based on
predetermined parameters.
It is defined by a specific universe (which can be a territorial region, a
group of people, or objects or elements like crops, vehicles etc.).
Census is defined by a point or period of time.
It covers every element of the universe or population of study, without
omission or duplication.
The census can provide the frame for scientific design of surveys, by pointing
towards the size of a representative sample, the strata that might be considered
for the sample (economic categories like household income, property and asset,
land holding or social categories like gender, age, caste, class, identity and so
on,) etc. The results from a survey can be cross checked and compared with
census computations provided the parameters and definitions of enquiry are in
alignment with each other. A sample might utilize the same units of measure as
utilized by the census for the purposes of uniformity.

2. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of census.

Answer:
5.3.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Survey Research
Survey research has the following advantages:
(i) It is inexpensive and less time consuming with in-depth fieldwork-based
research.

Collection
(ii) It has a wide coverage (i.e. a large section of population can be covered
through survey research) Also, survey research can be carried out in
remote locations through e-mails, telephone etc.
(iii) Many questions can be asked through a survey.
(iv) Since the same set of question is asked to the whole sample, it is possible

26
to draw comparisons.
Survey research has the following disadvantages:
(i) Sometimes, it is difficult to frame question that are relevant to/ can be
answered by everyone included in the sample.
(ii) It is in- flexible in the sample.
(iii) These is a likelihood that respondents do not answer all the question or
not provide reliable data.
(iv) Socio-economic context is often ignored.

3. What is Survey Research? Discuss advantages and disadvantages of surveys.

Answer:
5.3 SURVEY
Survey is a method of collecting information from a sample of the population.
A sample is a subset of units in a population, selected to represent all units in a
population of interest. It is a partial enumeration because it is a count from part of
the population. Information from the sampled units is used to estimate the
characteristics for the entire population of interest. Surveys come in many
different forms and have a wide variety of purposes. Unlike a census, they gather
information from only a small sample of people (or farms, businesses or other
units, depending on the purpose of the study). Information is collected by means
of standardized questions so that every individual/unit surveyed responds to and
is evaluated for exactly the same question. Data is gathered to study demographic
information, knowledge, opinions, behavior, attitudes, habits, desires, values and
beliefs etc. Survey as a method seeks to identify principles on the sample design,
data collection instruments, statistical adjustment of data and data processing. A
survey can be used for both quantitative and qualitative research.
5.3.1 What is Survey Research?
Traditionally, surveys are recognised as a part of quantitative research, and are
vastly used as such till date. In quantitative research the sample is scientifically
chosen so that each individual in the population has a known chance of selection.
In this way, the results can be reliably projected to the larger public. Thus the
sample must be comprehensive in its design and extensive enough to provide a
reliable representation of the whole population.
The objective is not to describe the particular individuals who by chance are part
of the sample, but to obtain a statistical profile of the population. Individual
respondents are not identified. Survey's results are presented in the form of
summaries, such as statistical tables and charts.
A survey can be used to acquire demographic and socio-economic profile of a
population, however it can also be used for knowledge, opinions, behavior, and
attitudes etc., however it misses out on personal feelings or thoughts on the
situation.
5.3.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Survey Research
Survey research has the following advantages:
(i) It is inexpensive and less time consuming with in-depth fieldwork-based
research.
(ii) It has a wide coverage (i.e. a large section of population can be covered
through survey research) Also, survey research can be carried out in
remote locations through e-mails, telephone etc.
(iii) Many questions can be asked through a survey.
(iv) Since the same set of question is asked to the whole sample, it is possible
to draw comparisons.
Survey research has the following disadvantages:
(i) Sometimes, it is difficult to frame question that are relevant to/ can be
answered by everyone included in the sample.
(ii) It is in- flexible in the sample.

27
(iii) These is a likelihood that respondents do not answer all the question or
not provide reliable data.
(iv) Socio-economic context is often ignored.

4. Compare census with survey.

Answer:
5.4 COMPARISON BETWEEN CENSUS AND
SURVEY
Census and Survey are both research methods that guide the collection of data in
a research process. While census enumerates every unit of the population, survey
is based on a sample or subset of the population (based on the parameters of the
research). As survey (especially in quantitative research) works though a
representative sample of the population, census often forms the baseline for
designing sample surveys by providing a sampling frame. They use standardized
patterns of information collection to facilitate comparative analysis; future
projections; administrative policy and planning; business marketing, and
planning. Surveys can also provide information on opinions, behavior, attitudes,
habits, desires, values and beliefs etc, and are used in both quantitative and
qualitative research. Census usually needs a large amount of resources in terms of
administration, finance, logistics, manpower and time. In comparison with
census, a survey based on sample collection (for the same research) is less
resource intensive. Both census and survey are valuable research methods, and
their use needs to be dictated by the need of the research.
Sl. No. Census Survey
1 Census is used for quantitative
research.
Survey is used in both quantitative
and qualitative research.
2 Complete enumeration: Census
is a systematic method that
requires collecting recording of
data about all the members of the
population.
Partial enumeration: Survey
considers a subset of the population
selected to represent the entire group,
in all its characteristics.
3 Census is best suited for a
population of heterogeneous
nature.
Survey is better suited for
homogeneous social groups.
4 As census accounts for every
unit of the population, the data
when analyzed has greater
accuracy and reliability.
There are predictable chances of
errors in the results drawn from the
sample
5 Benchmark data may be
obtained for future studies and
baseline for drawing sample for
surveys.
Interim surveys can be utilized to
draw enhanced statistical projections

28
form census data
6 Census leads to numerical
enumerations of the population.
Survey can gather information on
opinions, behaviour, attitudes, habits,
desires, values and beliefs
7 Census requires considerable
resources (administrative,
financial, logistical, managerial
etc.)
A survey requires comparatively less
resources as the enumeration of a
sample is easier than the whole.
8 Census is time consuming. A survey requires comparatively less
time.

5. Outline the uses of census data.

Answer: 5.2.2 Uses of Census Data
Modern census data are commonly used for research and future projections;
administrative policy and planning; business and marketing, and planning as a
baseline for designing sample surveys by providing a sampling frame. Census
also brings out the heterogeneity in a population this helps in understanding the
stratification of the population into subgroups, as well as recognizing the
weightage that each group deserves based on related parameters.
Let us take a look at how census information can be utilized by taking the
example of the Indian population census. As discussed earlier, the census in India
is conducted every 10 years, Office of the registrar general and the Census
commissioner of India, (https://censusindia.gov.in/Data_Products/Library/
Indian_perceptive_link/Census_Objectives_link/censusobjectives.htm), provides
a detailed description of the objectives, essentials and utility of census, let us look
at some of these in terms of the ways in which the information collected is
utilized.
(i) Projections and Research: Country-wide data on in terms of the urban-
rural areas, geographic dispersion according to occupation, education, sex
and age, economic characteristics and, social structure of population etc.
analysis of the composition, distribution, and growth of the population
accurate (both over a period of time as also projection for future). The
changing patterns of various population distributions are provided by
population census. Such appraisal is important for research and practical
problems of national, industrial and commercial growth and management.
Census data serve as the baseline for computing various indicators. For
example, census results, time-adjusted by migration statistics, can provide
estimates of the future size, distribution and other characteristics of the
population of the total country and sub-national areas. Or census data on
fertility can provide a bench-mark check on the reliability of current birth
statistics. Thus, census data can be utilized for making projections for the
future as well as crosschecking the previous projections with factual reality.
(ii) Administration, Policy and Planning: One of the most basic of the
administrative uses of census data is in the demarcation of constituencies
and the allocation of representation on governing bodies. Detailed
information on the geographic distribution of the population is indispensable
for this purpose.
Demographic and economic characteristics of the population collected
through census are essential for evaluation of economic and social problems,
which must precede the determination of policy affecting economic and

29
social development.
Collection
Businesses and industries can effectively use census data to make reliable
estimates of consumer demand for variety of goods, commodities and
services, based on the population or social group that they cater to. The
information from census feeds into operational research providing for
demand related to housing, furnishing, clothing, recreational facilities,
medical supplies and so forth. Further, the local availability of labour for
production and distribution of commodities can be easily determined by the
use of census data.
(iii) Recognising the heterogeneity of the population: Census provides the
official counts used to assign the number of elected representatives to
regions. The social and cultural data collected in the census is employed to
determine the total number of seats to be reserved for women, members of
scheduled castes, scheduled tribes and other socially marginal groups in the
House of People and the Legislative Assemblies of the States.
(iv) Census as frame for Sample Surveys: Size of populations as also other
characteristics of the population. This makes its necessary to conduct regular
inter-census sample survey. These surveys provide updated and detailed data
on many characteristics that are usually investigated in population census
conducted intervals of ten years.
Box 5.3 Essential features of Census
It is a quantitative research method.
It advocates a systematic, standardized data collection based on
predetermined parameters.
It is defined by a specific universe (which can be a territorial region, a
group of people, or objects or elements like crops, vehicles etc.).
Census is defined by a point or period of time.
It covers every element of the universe or population of study, without
omission or duplication.
The census can provide the frame for scientific design of surveys, by pointing
towards the size of a representative sample, the strata that might be considered
for the sample (economic categories like household income, property and asset,
land holding or social categories like gender, age, caste, class, identity and so
on,) etc. The results from a survey can be cross checked and compared with
census computations provided the parameters and definitions of enquiry are in
alignment with each other. A sample might utilize the same units of measure as
utilized by the census for the purposes of uniformity.

UNIT 6 OBSERVATION
6. 2 WHAT IS OBSERVATION?
Observation has to be distinguished from everyday seeing. Observation is a
significant technique of social research. It which enables researchers to
understand people and their behavior in their natural setting and arrive at
meaningful inferences. Unlike other research techniques, in observation the
researcher witnesses events or phenomena first hand i.e., he/she as it exists in real
life situation. . The researcher relies upon his/her sense impressions in
interpreting the event or phenomena. Observation may serve a variety of research
purposes, it may be used to explore the given area of subject matter or to gain
insight into the research problem.
Far from being simple and easy to use, the technique of observation comprises
standardized procedures and established practices failing which inferences could
be erroneous. The hypothesis could guide observation. For example, if we are
interested in the causes of highway accidents and have tentatively formulated an
exploratory hypothesis that accidents are caused by over speeding, we focus our

30
attention on our concepts of speeding vehicles and the consequences. Research
objectives determine the direction and stresses the facts upon which to
concentrate. However, the observer must be sensitive to wholly unanticipated and
chance phenomena which may come to play an important role in the research
process. Let us consider the example of highway accidents again. Now, while
observing speeding vehicles, the researcher could also observe that most of the
speeding vehicles are driven by youth in the age group of 20-25 years. The
additional information regarding age of drivers of speeding vehicles could enrich
the analysis.
Observation in research process differs from other techniques of data collection
in four ways: (i) observation is always direct while other methods could be direct
or indirect; (ii) field observation takes place in a natural setting; (iii) observation
tends to be less structured; and (iv) it makes only the qualitative (and not the
quantitative) study which aims at discovering subjects’ experiences and how
subjects make sense of them (phenomenology) or how subjects understand their
life (interpretivism).
The observer must apply a range of tools for systematizing and recording the data
which are part of his/her experience. This helps to make the process of
observation effective and reduce the errors of the observer. Sometimes, the
researcher looks for a guideline to direct the observation. In order to deal with
such a requirement, he/she prepares a form which lists down the behaviour,
situation, and context to be observed and recorded in the course of observation.
This is called an observation schedule.
It is important to note down what one observes in the field situation. It could be
in the form of a diary, or it may be a daily record of each item, written under
appropriate subheadings. Original notes are later re-analysed and placed under
the appropriate categories. Field notes aid an orderly and purposeful study and to
grasp certain relationship of events.
Observation can be effectively supplemented with photographs. Use of
photographs as supplement to observation overcomes the possibility of some
important aspect escaping the eye of the researcher. Also, photographs are free of
bias of the researcher. They bring in detail, authenticity, and impartiality to the
research work. According to Pauline V. Young (1966:178), “Whenever possible,
photographs should be introduced in a series which might illustrate various
aspects of situations….For example, when the photographs of three Molokan
generations are compared, we can gain considerable understanding of the degree
of cultural change which occurred in the assimilation process of the groups
portrayed, judging at least by outward appearances.”
We must remember that observation of social phenomena becomes scientific
when it is pursued with stated objectives, is systematically organized, employscertain
mechanisms to resist bias and uncontrolled observation. A researcher Observation
could observe interactions, processes, or behaviours as they occur; for example,
observing student- teacher interaction or he/she could watch the results of
interactions, processes, or behaviours; for example, measuring the amount of
plate waste left by students in a school cafeteria to determine whether a new food
item is liked by them.

2. What are the main limitations of observation technique?

Answer:

3. Outline the types of observation, their uses and limitations.

Answer: 6.3 TYPES OF OBSERVATION
Observation is of three types. Let us discuss each one of them.
(i) Non-Participant Observation: Here the researcher observes the group
without interfering with what is going on. He/she remains an outsider

31
throughout the period of observation. This enables him/her to be objective in
recording observations. There is a possibility that those who are being
studied know that they are being observed. This is overt observation. The
other possibility is that those who are being studied do not know that they
are being observed. This is covert observation.
The advantage of covert observation is that people are more likely to behave
naturally if they do not know they are being observed. However, covert
observation could be ethically improper. This technique, however, offers
limited scope to understand the research situations. Insightful socio-cultural
accounts of events, actions of the members of the group or community will
remain elusive with non-participant method.
(ii) Participant Observation: A researcher is said to be carrying out participant
observation when he/she participates in the social and cultural life of a
people and understand a social phenomenon or problem. Since doing
participant observation means being embedded in the action and context of a
social setting, it involves: (i) getting into the location of whatever aspect of
the human experience one wishes to study;(ii) building rapport with the
participants; and (iii) spending enough time interacting to get the needed
data.
Thus participant observation enables the researcher to gain a deep
understanding and familiarity with a certain group of individuals, their
values, beliefs, and way of life. By living with the group, becoming a part of
it, for an extended period of time enables to gain a sufficient range of
experiences, conversations, and relatively unstructured interviews for
analysis. The researchers are able to formulate first-hand accounts of their
lives and gain novel insights.
This research method was pioneered by anthropologists Bronislaw
Malinowski and Franz Boas but was adopted as a primary research method
by many sociologists later. Today, participant observation, is a primary
research method practiced by qualitative sociologists around the world.
Participant observation calls for the researcher going to the site where the
people he/she wants to study reside. The researcher is require to preferably
live with them (usually between 12 and 18 months), speak their language,
participate in their day-to-day activities and collect information using the
anthropological techniques (e.g., census surveys, questionnaires, interviews).
The advantage of participant observation is that the researcher obtains an
insight into the social and cultural life of the people from their own
perspective. Any question arising in the mind of the researcher pertaining to,
for example, why they are performing a particular ritual, is answered by the
people there and then.
(iii) Quasi-Participant Observation: It is also important to note that purely
non-participant observation is extremely difficult. One cannot understand or
comprehend the social life without any participation in it. The term, quasi-
participant observation refers to a situation when the researcher participates
selectively in the life and culture he/she sets out to study. The observer
actively participates in some of the ordinary activities and observes passively
from distance in others.

4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of observation technique.

Answer: 6.5 MERITS AND DEMERITS OF OBSERVATION
TECHNIQE
Following are some of the merits of observation method:
i) It is a simple method of data collection.
ii) Observation is the most direct means of studying a wide variety of
phenomena based on actual and first-hand experience.

32
iii) It enables the observer to study and record behaviour at the time of its
occurrence.
iv) Data collected under this method is more accurate and reliable, as it is
based on the first hand perception of the eyes. Non-participant
observation, however, may provide limited insight into the meaning of
the social context studied. If this contextual understanding is important,
participant observation might be needed.
v) It enables data collection on a large size of the population at one time.
vi) Non-participant observation does not depend on people’s cooperation
with the researcher.
vii) Participant observation, in which researchers join people and participate
in a group’s routine activities for the purpose of observing them within
that context, lets researchers study a naturally occurring social activity.
This fosters an in depth and rich understanding of a phenomenon,
situation and/or setting and the behaviour of the participants within that
setting.
Observation, as method of study and data collection, however raises many ethical
questions. Particularly, participant observation is a much debated method among
all social science research methods.
i) The researcher lives with the people being studied for relatively a longer
period of time, participates in their day-to-day activities, observes them
from close quarters, gains access to the intimate aspects of social, cultural
life of people. At the same time s/he has the task of recording of the
observed events, phenomena, activities in a faithful manner. Bernard
(1988) suggests that what could clearly be considered as ‘gossip’ during
informal conversation can become data for the researcher. Such kind of
issues becomes part of the ethical concerns of the social science research.
It is often questioned that whether the researcher informs the people she
interacts with for data collection about the usage of such information.
ii) Further, there are ethical questions regarding the publication of
information collected through field notes. Related to this is the
preservation of anonymity of participants identified in field notes. It is
suggested that with computerization maintenance of anonymity becomes
easier than otherwise.
iii) Another concern raised about the limitation of participant observation is
the extent of attachment developed by the researcher with the respondents
or informants during field work. During participant observation the
researchers often get so involved that they tend to lose objectivity in their
observation. Critics go to the extent of questioning how valid participant
observation really is. They argue the method lacks objectivity. It can be
very difficult for the researcher to avoid subjectivity and forming biased
views of the group being studied.
iv) Also researchers decide what is significant and worth recording and what’s
not, therefore, it depends on the values of the researcher. In extreme cases,
researchers might ‘go native’, where they become sympathetic with the
respondents and omit any negative analysis of their way of life.
v) Personal factors of the researcher become critical in participant
observation. Factors like age, sex, race, ethnic background, presentation of
self may influence the process of observation. For example, Dewatt and
Dewatt (2002) note that male and female researchers have access to
different information, as they have access to different people, settings, and
bodies of knowledge.
vi) Basic understanding of cultural aspects of the group or community studied
on the part of the researcher may be essential for a good observation.
Researcher proceeds for observation with theoretical framework and pre-

33
fixed hypotheses with an assumption to test them. Sometimes these may
become so fixed that the researcher ignores the other equally significant
events in the field. It is a widely held notion that social scientists, how
much ever they try to restrain from imposing their values, ideas, beliefs in
observation, fail to capture social reality objectively.
vii) Participant observation method tends to be time consuming and expensive.
It can take time to gain trust and build rapport, and so for this reason, it
may take several days, weeks or even months, before the respondents
really start to relax in the presence of the researcher.
viii) Gaining access in their area/community can also be a problem as many
people may not be comfortable in being researched this way, and where
covert research is concerned, researchers are limited by their own
characteristics. The challenge, however, is gaining access to a setting
without disrupting the pattern of others’ behaviour. Becoming an inside
member of a group, organization, or subculture takes time and effort.
Researchers must pretend to be something they are not. The process could
involve role playing, making contacts, networking, or applying for a job. A
researcher might work as a waitress in a diner, or live as a homeless person
for several weeks, or ride along with police officers as they patrol their
regular beat. Often, these researchers try to blend in seamlessly with the
population they study, and they may not disclose their true identity or
purpose if they feel it would compromise the results of their research. Observation
Once inside a group, some researchers spend months or even years
pretending to be one of the people they are observing. Information
gathered during participant observation is mostly qualitative, rather than
quantitative, the end results are often descriptive or interpretive.
ix) Fieldwork by its very nature involves very long drawn out and intensive
research usually by a single scholar working alone. As such, it can only
cover a very small part of the world — generally a single village or small
community. We can never be sure whether what the anthropologist or
sociologist observed during fieldwork is really very common in the larger
community (i.e. in other villages, region, or in the country) or whether it is
exceptional.
x) Another important limitation of field work method is that we are never
sure whether it is the voice of the researcher we are hearing or that of the
people being studied. Of course, the aim is to represent the views of the
people being studied, but it is always possible that the researcher —
whether consciously or unconsciously — is selecting what will be written
down in his/her notes, and how it will be presented to the readers of his/her
books or articles. Because there is no other version available to us except
that of the researcher, there is always the chance of bias or error.

5. Explain participant observation as a technique of data collection with reference to

the study of Malinowski.
Answer: 6.4 STUDIES BASED ON PARTICIPANT
OBSERVATION
Participant observation, for many years, has been a hallmark of both
anthropological and sociological studies. Here let us refer to two important
studies that are based on participant observation.
6.4.1 Argonauts of the Western Pacific
Malinowski conducted field work in the Trobriand Islands, off the eastern coast
of New Guinea. His fieldwork centred around the idea that the researcher should
fully participate in the culture that is being studied as much as possible, in order
to best observe and record the practices that are occurring. He spent 23 months in
the Islands in two phases. His famous work is Argonauts of the Western Pacific

34
which documents his stay in the Trobriand Islands, observing social
relationships, economic matters, as well as the physical and psychological well-
being of its people. In his studies of the Trobriand Islands, Malinowski attempted
“to grasp the native’s point of view, his relation to life, to realize his vision of his
world”.
His ethnography of the Trobriand Islands described the complex institution of
the Kula ring (a complex inter-island exchange of arm shell bracelets and
necklaces), and became foundational for subsequent theories of reciprocity and
exchange. In Melanesia, every year there was a ceremonial exchange of a
bracelet and a necklace that involved a ring of many islands. The items were not
made of particularly expensive materials nor represented excellent craftsmanship.
This led Malinowski to investigate what function this could provide for the
islanders. Malinowski's work brought the value of such previously unappreciated
cultures to the attention of those in developed societies, showing that there is
much to learn about human nature and human society from all people, no matter
how "primitive" or strange they might initially appear.
6.4.2 Street Corner Society
The pioneering work of W.H. Whyte on street corner society is based on
participant observation of an Italian slum in the suburbs of Boston. It is perhaps
the most referred work on participant observation in sociology. During the late
1930s, William F Whyte moved into a low income Italian neighbourhood in
Boston. For nearly four years he was a member of the social circle of “corner
boys” that he describes in Street Corner Society. Whyte revealed his identity to
these men and joined in their conversations, bowling and other leisure time
activities. His goal was to gain greater insight into the community that these men
had established. As Whyte listened to the leader of the group, he “learned the
answers to questions I would not even have had the sense to ask if I had been
getting my information solely on an interviewing basis”. Whyte’s work was
especially valuable, since at the time the academic world had little direct
knowledge of the poor, and tended to rely for information on the records of social
service agencies, hospitals, and courts (P Adler et al. 1992)
Box 6.3 Participant Observation: Some Difficulties Foote
Compared to the anthropologist who studies a primitive tribe in a remote part of
the world, the student of a modern American community faces distinctly different
problems. In the first place, he is dealing with a literate people. It is certain that
some of these people, and perhaps many of them, will read his research report. If
he disguises the name of the district as I have done, many outsiders apparently
will not discover where the study was actually located... The people in the
district, of course, know it is about them, and even the changed names do not
disguise the individuals for them. They remember the researcher and know the
people with whom he associated and know enough about the various groups to
place the individuals with little chance of error. In such a situation the researcher
carries a heavy responsibility. He would like his book to be of some help to the
people of the district; at least, he wants to take steps to minimise the chances of it
doing any harm, fully recognising the possibility that certain individuals may
suffer through the publication. (Foote 2012:342)

Unit 7 Questionnaire, Schedule, and Interview

1. What is an 'Interview Guide'? What is the significance of an interview guide in
fieldwork?
Answer: 7.5 INTERVIEW
Interviews are different from questionnaires as they involve close and sometimes
prolonged interaction between researcher and informants. The objective of this
interaction is collection of data relevant to the study. . There is a difference
between “everyday conversation” and “interview”. While conversation is casual

35
and could cover any topic of common interest, interview is based on the
theme(s), ideas and issues pertaining to the study. Here, the researcher controls
the direction in which the interaction proceeds. Taking interviews is preceded by
preparing a list/outline of questions on the topics relating to the research problem.
This list is known as the interview guide. It is used as a ready reference by the
interviewer to cover as many issues a possible in a limited period of time.
Box 7.1 Types of Interviews
Interviews may be broadly divided into two types. In the first, the interviewer has
a basic idea of the areas about which he would be interviewing the respondent.
He carries with him a list of the topics-what may be technically called the
‘interview guide’- that would guide him during the interview, but he does not
structure specific questions in advance. In such situations, an interview is more or
less a ‘free-floating’ conversation. Often, the interviewer begins with what seems
interesting to him or what he things would be interesting to the respondent. The
interview may cover a number of areas. Called unstructured, it is time
consuming, but yields a lot of information apart from the topics in which the
interviewer is particularly interested. Therefore, the fieldworker has to sluice
away the grit to index what is especially relevant to him.
By comparison, the other kind of interview is structured, in which the
investigator prepares a set of questions in advance and is specifically committed
to seeking their answer. If the respondent deviates from the topic, the interviewer
requests him to return to the point. Such an intervention might annoy the
respondent, making him lose interest in the interview, but much depends on how
the interviewer handles such situations. Unstructured and structured interviews
may also be combined. The interviewer prepares an inventory of the topics of his
interest in advance and then starts the interview in a conversational manner. Once
rapport has been established, he may gradually funnel down his enquiry, making
it structured. The way in which the interview develops depends greatly on the
respondent’s perception of the interviewer’s role.
More elaborately, interviews have been classified into focused, depth, clinical,
repeated, and group interviews (Young 1968: 219-22). The focused interview
takes place with an individual known to have been involved in a particular
situation. In a depth interview, the interviewee is encouraged free expression for
an understanding about his/her subjective dimension. Clinical interviews are
conducted for gauging the health and psychological status of a person. Social
workers, counsellors, and prison workers carry out personal history interviews of
the subjects with whom they deal. In a depth interview, the investigator may use
projective techniques, such as picture interpretation and sentence and story
completion. When the same respondent in interview again, it is known as a
repeated interview, and when it is an interview with a group, rather than a
individual, it is termed a group interview. (Srivastava 2004: 29-30)
An interview guide helps in focussing attention on the salient points in the study;
securing comparable data in different interviews; gathering the same range of
items essential in the analysis of data or testing the hypothesis formulated. The
interview guide serves as an aid or a helpful tool and should not lead to strict
adherence to a set of pre-determined questions .It should not hamper the logical
flow of the interview and serve as a flexible tool.
7.5.1 Merits and Demerits of Interview Technique
The main merits of the interview technique are as follows:
Interview technique can be used in both literate and illiterate populations.
The researcher can make a selection of informants he/she would interview.
This selection can be based on researcher’s personal choice or sampling
procedure.
Interview enables the researcher to obtain data in detail.
Interview provides an opportunity to re-frame questions, add and/or skip

36
some questions. The way questions are asked can be adapted to the nature
of an informant.
In the course of an interview the researcher is able to understand the social
context of the informant as well as his/her willingness, emotions and
personal characteristics that may enhance the quality of data.
However there are certain demerits of this interview method:
Interviews are difficult to conduct in large heterogeneous population and in
inaccessible geographical. areas
There is likelihood that the bias of the researcher would influence the
interview.
Interviews are more-time-consuming, especially when the sample is large
and largely depend on the willingness of informants when the researcher
goes prepared to conduct the interview. .
It is likely that the presence of the researcher influences the response of the
informant. Researcher’s personal nature and behaviour could influence the
response. Also, the researcher needs to be trained to conduct the interview.

2. Difference between Questionnaire and schedule.

Answer:
7.4 COMPARISON BETWEEN QUESTIONNAIRE
AND SCHEDULE
There are certain differences between questionnaire and schedule as listed below.
A questionnaire is filled by the respondents, while the researcher fills the
schedule.
Questionnaire is more rigid in structure than schedule. Researchers have
no control over response rate in case of questionnaires as many people do
not respond and/or often return them without answering all the questions.
On the contrary, researchers have control over the response rate of
schedules since they collect data themselves.
While questionnaire has a larger reach since it can be distributed to a
large number of people at the same time, schedule has a limited reach.
Identity of respondents is protected when data is collected using
questionnaire technique while identity of informants is revealed when
data is collected using schedule technique of data collection.
The success of the questionnaire depends much on the quality of the
questionnaire while the research acumen and experience of the researcher
determines the success of a schedule.
The questionnaire can be employed only when the respondents are literate
while schedule can be used for data collection from both literate and
illiterate informants.
Possibility of obtaining incomplete and imprecise information is relatively more
when data is collected through questionnaires than through schedules since the
researcher is present in the field situation to verify and corroborate data there-
and-then.

3. Explain main features of questionnaire, schedule and interview;

Answer:
7.2 QUESTIONNAIRE
Questionnaire refers to a technique of data collection by using a set of questions
which is sent to respondents by hand, by post or email. It could be web-based
too. A respondent fills up the answers of the questions in the space provided for
the purpose in the questionnaire itself.
Questionnaire is a technique of data collection which is widely used not only by
those in academics but also people engaged with marketing, advertising and other
fields. It is designed to collect data from large, diverse and widely scattered

37
groups of people. A questionnaire consists of number of questions that are
printed in a definite order. The questionnaire is sent to respondents either by
hand, post or email. At the beginning of the questionnaire itself, the researcher
explains his/her identity and the purpose of the research for which data is being
collected through the questionnaire. Often, the researcher adds that the
information collected through the questionnaire will be kept confidential, will not
be shared with anyone, and will be used only for the purpose for which it is being
collected. This provides a sense of confidence among respondents. It is ethically
improper to break the confidence of respondents.
Box 7.0 Guidelines for Construction of a Questionnaire
Following are Guidelines for Construction of a Questionnaire:
(i) A questionnaire should clearly mention the purpose for which it will be
used.
(ii) Clear instructions should be provided to respondents for filling-up the
questionnaire.
(iii) All questions should be in simple language, easy to understand and self-
explanatory.
(iv) All the questions should relate with the objectives of the study.
Unnecessary questions should not be included in the questionnaire.
(v) The number of questions should not be too large. It has been found that
respondents get bored or do not have the time to fill-up long questionnaires.
(vi) Questions should be arranged judiciously. Simple questions should be
placed in the beginning and complex ones towards the end.
(vii) Questions should be logically arranged. In fact, one question should be
related with the other.
Questions in a questionnaire can be closed-ended, open-ended or a combination
of both. Closed-ended questions are those that for which respondents are required
to choose a response from a set of given options. Let us consider an example:
What is your marital status?
(i) Single (ii) Married (iii) Divorced (iv) Separated (v) Widowed
Main advantage of closed-ended questions is that answers of respondents can be
compared easily. Also, they are easy and can be answered quickly. However,
they curtail the free-will and creativity of respondents.
Open-ended questions are used to get free and spontaneous expressions from the
respondents. These can be used to as an exploratory tool to gain insight to the
viewpoints and attitude, describe relationships, and indicate problems, details and
events, without restrictions imposed as in the case of closed questions.

Open-ended questions could fetch responses that are completely unanticipated by

the researcher. The response could open up new ways of looking an issue and
reveal the logic, understanding, and perspective of respondents. The main
disadvantage, however, is the possibility of vague responses that do not relate
with the question asked. Also, answers of different respondents cannot be
compared; space provided for answers may be insufficient as some respondents
tend to write long answers which will make the questionnaire bulky.
It is important that a questionnaire is pre-tested before being administered to
respondents. For pre-testing, a questionnaire is first administered to a limited
number of respondents. The purpose is to make an assessment of each question
from the perspective of respondents. In the course of pre-testing, a researcher
may find that respondents are not able to answer certain questions because of
difficult language, way in which they are framed, or the manner in which they are
arranged. The researcher makes necessary changes in the questionnaire based on
the response received. It is only after a questionnaire is pre-tested that it is
finalized.
The merits of the questionnaire method are:

38
 It can cover far-flung and inaccessible regions where a researcher may not
be able to go.
It is less expensive to administer. This is because questionnaires are most
often mailed or handed over to a large number of respondents
simultaneously.
Data from a large sample can be collected at the same time. Large
samples can be made use of and thus the results can be made more
dependable and reliable.
Questionnaire minimizes the bias of the researcher. . It offers greater
anonymity. Since the researcher is interested in the answers to the
questions, rather than the persons, respondents may feel free to express
their opinion without ambiguity or fear. It also puts less pressure on the
respondents for immediate responses.
The main demerits of collecting data through a questionnaire are:
Can be used only in literate population
Response rate could be low
Researcher is not available to explain a question or ask a question based
on the response on an open-ended question. There is a possibility of
ambiguous replies or omission of replies altogether to certain questions.
Activity1
Construct a questionnaire to be administered to the millennial belonging to higher
middle class with an objective to understand their spending behaviour. Itemise
the areas of expenditure as being food, entertainment, investment, mobile and
electronic items purchase and frame closed and open ended questions to
understand the percentage spending on each item and what priorities do they
have in their spending behaviour.
7.3 SCHEDULE
Like the questionnaire, schedule is technique of data collection, which contains a
list of questions. The difference between a questionnaire and schedule, however,
is that while the former is filled by respondents, the latter is filled by the
researcher. The researcher goes to the informants with the schedule, and asks
them the questions. Researcher plays an important role in the collection of data,
through schedules. They explain the aims and objects of the research to the
respondents and interpret the questions to them when required. Most common
example of data collection through schedule is population census.
The main advantage of schedule is the presence of the researcher. In simple
terms, the researcher could explain the question in detail, seek additional
information (i.e., information beyond the questions listed in the schedule), obtain
clarification on the response, may change the sequence, language and style of
questions.
While framing a schedule, the researcher has to take many aspects into
consideration. In fact, it is appropriate to identify the aspects on which the
schedule needs to be prepared. These aspects are logically arranged and relevant
questions are framed. It is likely that more than one question is asked on an
aspect with the purpose of obtaining complete information.
5 INTERVIEW
Interviews are different from questionnaires as they involve close and sometimes
prolonged interaction between researcher and informants. The objective of this
interaction is collection of data relevant to the study. . There is a difference
between “everyday conversation” and “interview”. While conversation is casual
and could cover any topic of common interest, interview is based on the
theme(s), ideas and issues pertaining to the study. Here, the researcher controls
the direction in which the interaction proceeds. Taking interviews is preceded by
preparing a list/outline of questions on the topics relating to the research problem.
This list is known as the interview guide. It is used as a ready reference by the

39
interviewer to cover as many issues a possible in a limited period of time.
Box 7.1 Types of Interviews
Interviews may be broadly divided into two types. In the first, the interviewer has
a basic idea of the areas about which he would be interviewing the respondent.
He carries with him a list of the topics-what may be technically called the
‘interview guide’- that would guide him during the interview, but he does not
structure specific questions in advance. In such situations, an interview is more or
less a ‘free-floating’ conversation. Often, the interviewer begins with what seems
interesting to him or what he things would be interesting to the respondent. The
interview may cover a number of areas. Called unstructured, it is time
consuming, but yields a lot of information apart from the topics in which the
interviewer is particularly interested. Therefore, the fieldworker has to sluice
away the grit to index what is especially relevant to him.
By comparison, the other kind of interview is structured, in which the
investigator prepares a set of questions in advance and is specifically committed
to seeking their answer. If the respondent deviates from the topic, the interviewer
requests him to return to the point. Such an intervention might annoy the
respondent, making him lose interest in the interview, but much depends on how
the interviewer handles such situations. Unstructured and structured interviews
may also be combined. The interviewer prepares an inventory of the topics of his
interest in advance and then starts the interview in a conversational manner. Once
rapport has been established, he may gradually funnel down his enquiry, making
it structured. The way in which the interview develops depends greatly on the
respondent’s perception of the interviewer’s role.
More elaborately, interviews have been classified into focused, depth, clinical,
repeated, and group interviews (Young 1968: 219-22). The focused interview
takes place with an individual known to have been involved in a particular
situation. In a depth interview, the interviewee is encouraged free expression for
an understanding about his/her subjective dimension. Clinical interviews are
conducted for gauging the health and psychological status of a person. Social
workers, counsellors, and prison workers carry out personal history interviews of
the subjects with whom they deal. In a depth interview, the investigator may use
projective techniques, such as picture interpretation and sentence and story
completion. When the same respondent in interview again, it is known as a
repeated interview, and when it is an interview with a group, rather than a
individual, it is termed a group interview. (Srivastava 2004: 29-30)
An interview guide helps in focussing attention on the salient points in the study;
securing comparable data in different interviews; gathering the same range of
items essential in the analysis of data or testing the hypothesis formulated. The
interview guide serves as an aid or a helpful tool and should not lead to strict
adherence to a set of pre-determined questions .It should not hamper the logical
flow of the interview and serve as a flexible tool.

Unit 8 Case Study and Life History

1. Differentiate between case study method and life history method.
Answer:
1. Focus and Scope:
Case Study Method: The case study method is a detailed investigation of a specific social
phenomenon, which can be a person, group, event, organization, or community. The focus is
on understanding the whole context of the unit being studied. It examines multiple
dimensions and variables related to the case, including social, cultural, and economic
factors.

40
Life History Method: The life history method is a subset of the case study method. It
specifically focuses on the detailed study of an individual’s life. It aims to understand the
personal experiences, motivations, aspirations, challenges, and changes a person
undergoes throughout their life, and how these relate to the social and cultural contexts they
live in.

2. Type of Data Collected:

Case Study Method: This method collects a wide range of data, including both qualitative
and quantitative information. It may involve interviews, surveys, observations, and archival
research. The data is collected from multiple sources to gain a comprehensive
understanding of the case.
Life History Method: Life history relies heavily on qualitative data, primarily personal
narratives, interviews, and autobiographical accounts. The data collected focuses on the life
events, experiences, and stories that shape the individual’s worldview, behavior, and identity.

3. Research Unit:
Case Study Method: In case study research, the unit of analysis can be multiple cases or a
singular case, which could be an individual, a group, a community, an organization, or even
a specific event. The selection of the unit depends on the research objectives.
Life History Method: The unit of analysis in life history research is always the individual. It
seeks to document the life journey of a person and understand how their individual
experiences fit into broader societal and cultural patterns.

4. Methodology and Approach:

Case Study Method: The case study approach is holistic and can include a variety of
research methods, both qualitative and quantitative. It provides a multi-faceted view of the
case by considering various factors and their interactions within the broader context.
Life History Method: Life history is more narrative-driven and typically uses qualitative
methods such as interviews and personal accounts. It is a more focused and introspective
approach, aiming to capture the depth of a person’s life experiences and the meanings they
attribute to them.

5. Purpose of Study:
Case Study Method: The case study method aims to understand the phenomenon in its
natural context and identify patterns or generalizations that can be applied to similar
situations or contexts. It emphasizes contextual understanding and depth.
Life History Method: Life history aims to understand the individual's lived experience,
highlighting the personal, emotional, and social dimensions of their life. It offers insights into
the intersection of personal biography with larger cultural and social forces.

6. Significance in Social Science Research:

Case Study Method: Case studies are valuable for studying complex social phenomena and
are often used when researchers need a deep understanding of the relationship between
different variables. They are used to inform policy-making, intervention programs, and
theories in social science.
Life History Method: Life history is significant because it provides an intimate and detailed
perspective on individual lives, contributing to a more personalized understanding of social
issues. It is particularly useful in understanding issues like identity formation, migration,
social mobility, and personal challenges.

In conclusion, while both case study and life history methods offer in-depth insights, the case
study method is broader in scope, encompassing various types of units of analysis, while the
life history method focuses on a single individual’s experiences and personal history.

41
2. Explain the nature and scope of the case study method in sociological research.
Answer: Research design refers to the overall strategy or plan used by researchers to
conduct an investigation, organize data, and analyze results to answer research questions or
test hypotheses. It serves as a blueprint for the research process, ensuring the study is
systematic and coherent. There are various types of research designs, which can be broadly
classified into the following categories:

### 1. Descriptive Research Design:

Definition: Descriptive research design aims to describe a phenomenon as it naturally
occurs. It focuses on answering the "what" question by observing, describing, and
documenting aspects of a situation or population without manipulating any variables.
Purpose: This design is used when the researcher wants to provide an accurate
representation of the characteristics of a particular group, event, or phenomenon.
Methods: It includes methods such as surveys, case studies, observational studies, and
content analysis. Descriptive research does not involve altering the environment or the
subjects being studied.
Example: A researcher studying the demographic features of people living in a specific area,
or the patterns of behavior of a specific group, such as the daily activities of school children.

Advantages:
Simple to conduct and understand.
Provides a clear, systematic picture of the situation or group being studied.
Useful in establishing a foundation for further research.

Limitations:
Does not allow for conclusions about cause-and-effect relationships.
Findings may be limited to the specific context or group studied, reducing generalizability.

### 2. Experimental Research Design:

Definition: Experimental research design involves manipulating one or more independent
variables to observe their effect on a dependent variable while controlling for extraneous
factors. This type of research is commonly used to test hypotheses and establish causal
relationships.
Purpose: The primary goal of experimental research is to identify cause-and-effect
relationships between variables by systematically controlling and manipulating conditions.
Methods: In an experimental design, participants are randomly assigned to either
experimental or control groups. The researcher manipulates the independent variable(s) and
measures the effect on the dependent variable. Common experimental designs include
controlled experiments, field experiments, and laboratory experiments.
Example: A researcher studying the impact of a new drug on patient health might randomly
assign participants to a treatment group and a placebo group to determine the effects of the
drug.

Advantages:
Allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Provides more control over variables, ensuring greater internal validity.
Can be replicated by other researchers, enhancing the reliability of results.

Limitations:
May lack ecological validity, as controlled experiments can sometimes be too artificial.
Ethical concerns may arise, particularly when manipulating certain variables (e.g., in medical
trials).
Requires extensive resources, including time, money, and participants.

### 3. Correlational Research Design:

42
Definition: Correlational research design examines the relationship between two or more
variables without manipulating them. It identifies whether and to what extent variables are
related.
Purpose: The goal is to determine whether a relationship exists between variables, though it
does not establish causality. Researchers use correlational designs to study the association
or patterns between variables.
Methods: This type of research often uses surveys or observational methods to collect data
on the variables of interest. The relationship is typically measured using statistical tools like
Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

### 4. Exploratory Research Design:

Definition: Exploratory research design is used when there is limited knowledge about a
topic. It aims to gather preliminary insights and generate hypotheses for further investigation.
Purpose: It is often conducted when the problem is not well defined, and the researcher
needs to clarify or gain more information.
Methods: This design involves qualitative methods like focus groups, interviews, and case
studies.

### Conclusion:
Each research design serves a distinct purpose in the research process, depending on the
nature of the research question. Descriptive and experimental research designs are two
important approaches, with descriptive design focusing on observation and documentation,
and experimental design emphasizing control and manipulation to establish causality. Both
designs have their strengths and limitations, and the choice of which design to use depends
on the research objectives and the nature of the problem being studied.

3. What do you understand by extensive research?

Answer: A good research design is fundamental to the success of a study, as it provides the
framework for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. It ensures the research process is
organized, efficient, and valid. The following are key characteristics of a good research
design:

### 1. Clarity and Precision:

Definition: A good research design should clearly define the research problem, objectives,
and hypotheses.
Explanation: It should provide a precise statement of the research question and the purpose
of the study. A well-defined design helps prevent ambiguity and ensures that the research
objectives are focused.
Example: For instance, in a study on the effectiveness of a new teaching method, a clear
research question could be, "Does the new teaching method improve student learning
outcomes compared to traditional methods?"

### 2. Appropriate Methodology:

Definition: The research design should include an appropriate methodology that aligns with
the research objectives.
Explanation: It should specify whether the research will be qualitative, quantitative, or
mixed-methods and detail the specific techniques (e.g., surveys, experiments, case studies)
that will be employed to collect and analyze data.
Example: If studying the impact of a new product on customer behavior, a survey-based
methodology might be used to gather quantitative data.

### 3. Reliability and Validity:

Reliability: A good research design ensures that the methods used to collect data produce
consistent results when repeated under similar conditions.

43
Validity: It ensures that the design accurately measures what it intends to measure. The
design should minimize biases and errors that could compromise the study’s results.
Example: In an experimental design, using a control group helps ensure that observed
effects are due to the manipulated variable and not external factors.

### 4. Control and Manipulation (for Experimental Designs):

Definition: In experimental research, a good design allows the researcher to control
extraneous variables and manipulate the independent variables.
Explanation: It ensures that any changes in the dependent variable are due to the
manipulation of the independent variable, not confounding factors.
Example: Random assignment of participants to control and experimental groups helps
eliminate bias and ensures the validity of the study’s findings.

### 5. Generalizability:
Definition: A good research design should allow the results to be applicable to the larger
population beyond the study sample.
Explanation: This characteristic is particularly important for surveys and observational
studies, where the sample should ideally represent the broader population to which the
results will be generalized.
Example: A study on employee satisfaction in a particular industry should ensure the sample
includes a representative cross-section of employees across different companies in that
industry.

### 6. Ethical Considerations:

Definition: Ethical principles should guide the design of the research to protect the rights and
well-being of participants.
Explanation: It ensures that informed consent, confidentiality, and respect for participants'
autonomy are maintained throughout the study.
Example: If conducting medical research, obtaining informed consent from participants and
ensuring their privacy is maintained is essential.

### 7. Feasibility:
Definition: A good research design must be practical and feasible to execute within the
available resources, time, and budget.
Explanation: It should consider logistical factors like availability of data, sample size, and
access to necessary tools or facilities.
Example: If a researcher has limited funding, they might need to adjust the scope of the
study to ensure it can be completed within budget.

### 8. Reproducibility:
Definition: A well-designed research study should allow other researchers to replicate the
study and verify its findings.
Explanation: By providing clear documentation of the methodology, data collection
processes, and analysis techniques, the research design should facilitate replication.
Example: Clear instructions for data collection and analysis ensure that other researchers
can replicate the study in different contexts or with different populations.

### Conclusion:
A good research design is essential for producing reliable, valid, and ethically sound
research. It involves careful planning, methodological rigor, and consideration of ethical and
practical factors. The key characteristics—clarity, appropriateness, reliability, control,
generalizability, ethics, feasibility, and reproducibility—ensure that the research design
supports the successful completion of the study and the generation of meaningful findings.

4. Explain the case study method.

44
Answer: Research designs can be broadly classified into several types, each suited to
different research objectives and methodologies. These designs help in structuring the
research process, determining how data is collected, and guiding the analysis. Below are the
main types of research designs:

### 1. Descriptive Research Design:

Definition: Descriptive research aims to describe the characteristics of a population or
phenomenon.
Explanation: It focuses on providing an accurate portrayal of a situation or phenomenon
without manipulating variables.
Example: A survey conducted to determine the income levels of a specific demographic
group is a descriptive design.
Key Features:
Observes and records data without changing the environment.
Often used for preliminary studies or to explore the "what" of a situation.

### 2. Correlational Research Design:

Definition: Correlational research examines the relationship between two or more variables.
Explanation: It seeks to understand if a relationship exists but does not imply causality.
Example: A study investigating the correlation between hours of study and academic
performance in students.
Key Features:
Measures the strength and direction of relationships.
Cannot determine cause-and-effect relationships, only associations.

### 3. Experimental Research Design:

Definition: Experimental research involves manipulating one variable (independent variable)
to observe its effect on another variable (dependent variable).
Explanation: This design is used to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Example: A clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a new drug on reducing blood pressure is
an experimental design.
Key Features:
Requires control groups and random assignment to minimize biases.
Allows researchers to establish causality.

### 4. Quasi-Experimental Research Design:

Definition: Quasi-experimental research is similar to experimental design but lacks random
assignment.
Explanation: It is used when random assignment is not possible or ethical, but the
researcher still wants to study cause-and-effect relationships.
Example: A study comparing academic performance before and after a new teaching
method in two different schools.
Key Features:
Control groups are used but without random assignment.
Offers valuable insights but may be more prone to biases than true experimental designs.

### 5. Exploratory Research Design:

Definition: Exploratory research is conducted when there is limited information on a topic,
aiming to explore and identify new variables or relationships.
Explanation: It is often used to generate hypotheses or ideas for future research.
Example: Conducting interviews with experts in a new field of study to gather initial insights.
Key Features:
Flexible and open-ended.
Often involves qualitative methods like interviews or focus groups.

45
### 6. Case Study Research Design:
Definition: Case study research focuses on in-depth analysis of a single case or a small
number of cases.
Explanation: It provides detailed, context-rich insights into a particular issue, organization, or
phenomenon.
Example: A detailed investigation of a company's management practices to understand
organizational success.
Key Features:
Focuses on one or a few cases, often qualitative.
Provides deep understanding but may lack generalizability.

### 7. Cross-Sectional Research Design:

Definition: Cross-sectional research collects data at a single point in time or over a short
period.
Explanation: It provides a snapshot of the population at one specific moment.
Example: A study assessing public opinion on a political issue conducted just before an
election.
Key Features:
Time-efficient and cost-effective.
Cannot capture changes over time, limiting causal inferences.

### 8. Longitudinal Research Design:

Definition: Longitudinal research involves collecting data from the same subjects repeatedly
over a long period.
Explanation: It allows researchers to study changes and developments over time, making it
suitable for studying cause-and-effect relationships.
Example: A study tracking the health outcomes of individuals over several decades.
Key Features:
Provides insights into change over time.
Time-consuming and resource-intensive.

### Conclusion: The choice of research design depends on the research objectives, the
nature of the problem, and the available resources. Descriptive, correlational, experimental,
quasi-experimental, exploratory, case study, cross-sectional, and longitudinal designs all
have their distinct purposes, strengths, and limitations. A well-selected design is crucial for
obtaining valid and reliable results in a research study.

5. Distinguish between extensive research and intensive research.

Answer: The literature review is an essential component of any research project. It involves
reviewing and analyzing existing research, theories, and findings related to a specific
research topic or question. Below are the key reasons why literature review is important in
research:

### 1. Provides Context and Background:

Explanation: A literature review provides background information on the research topic by
summarizing and analyzing previous studies, theories, and developments in the field.
Importance: This contextual understanding helps researchers identify the current state of
knowledge, key concepts, and gaps in the field.

### 2. Identifies Research Gaps:

Explanation: By reviewing existing literature, researchers can pinpoint areas where further
research is needed.
Importance: Identifying gaps in the literature helps in formulating research questions that
address unresolved issues, contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the field.

46
### 3. Avoids Duplication:
Explanation: A thorough literature review allows researchers to see what has already been
researched and published.
Importance: This ensures that new research does not duplicate previous studies, saving time
and resources, and offering original contributions to the field.

### 4. Refines Research Questions:

Explanation: Reading and synthesizing the literature helps researchers refine and narrow
down their research questions or hypotheses.
Importance: A well-defined research question, based on the literature review, guides the
direction of the study and ensures that the research is focused and relevant.

### 5. Guides Research Methodology:

Explanation: A literature review provides insights into research methods, techniques, and
approaches used by other researchers in similar studies.
Importance: This helps researchers choose the most appropriate methodology for their own
study, ensuring the research is robust and reliable.

### 6. Establishes Theoretical Framework:

Explanation: The literature review helps researchers identify relevant theories, models, and
frameworks that have been developed in the field.
Importance: These frameworks guide the research process, helping to explain relationships
between variables and forming the basis for analysis and interpretation.

### 7. Enhances Credibility and Rigor:

Explanation: A well-conducted literature review shows that the researcher has engaged with
existing work and is aware of the broader academic conversation.
Importance: This strengthens the credibility of the research and ensures that the study is
built on a solid foundation of existing knowledge, increasing its academic rigor.

### 8. Supports the Development of Hypotheses:

Explanation: The literature review allows researchers to formulate hypotheses based on
what is known in the field.
Importance: These hypotheses guide the research process by proposing expected
outcomes, providing a basis for further investigation.

### 9. Informs Data Interpretation:

Explanation: By examining previous studies, researchers gain insight into how data has
been analyzed and interpreted in similar contexts.
Importance: This understanding helps in comparing and contrasting results, ensuring a more
comprehensive analysis of new data.

### 10. Contributes to Knowledge Dissemination:

Explanation: A literature review not only benefits the researcher but also contributes to the
wider academic community by synthesizing existing research and highlighting trends.
Importance: This dissemination of knowledge supports the ongoing development of the field
and encourages further research.

### Conclusion:
In summary, the literature review is an essential part of the research process that helps
provide context, refine research questions, guide methodology, and identify gaps in existing
knowledge. It enhances the credibility of the study and ensures that the research contributes
meaningfully to the academic community by building on previous work.

6. Explain the nature and scope of case study method and life history.

47
Answer: Research design refers to the framework or structure used to conduct research. It
outlines the procedures for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data. There are various
types of research designs, each suited to different research purposes and questions. Below
are the main types of research designs:

### 1. Descriptive Research Design:

Explanation: Descriptive research involves collecting data to describe characteristics of a
phenomenon or group.
Purpose: It aims to provide an accurate depiction of the variables, behaviors, or phenomena
being studied, without manipulating the variables.
Example: Survey research or observational studies.

### 2. Correlational Research Design:

Explanation: Correlational research examines the relationship between two or more
variables to determine if a statistical association exists.
Purpose: This design does not establish causality but identifies patterns or trends between
variables.
Example: Studying the relationship between physical activity and mental health.

### 3. Experimental Research Design:

Explanation: Experimental research involves manipulating one or more independent
variables to observe their effect on dependent variables.
Purpose: It is used to establish cause-and-effect relationships by controlling external
variables and random assignment of subjects.
Example: Clinical trials to test the effectiveness of a new drug.

### 4. Quasi-Experimental Research Design:

Explanation: Quasi-experimental research shares similarities with experimental research but
lacks random assignment of participants to groups.
Purpose: It is used when random assignment is not feasible or ethical, and researchers still
wish to study causal relationships.
Example: Studying the impact of a new educational program without random assignment.

### 5. Exploratory Research Design:

Explanation: Exploratory research is conducted when the researcher has limited knowledge
about a topic and aims to explore it further.
Purpose: It helps to identify key variables, patterns, and hypotheses for further study.
Example: Interviews or case studies to gain preliminary insights into a new issue.

### 6. Case Study Research Design:

Explanation: Case study research involves an in-depth, detailed examination of a single
case or a small group of cases.
Purpose: It provides a comprehensive understanding of complex issues in real-life settings.
Example: A case study of a specific company or community to explore its challenges and
strategies.

### 7. Longitudinal Research Design:

Explanation: Longitudinal research involves studying the same subjects over an extended
period.
Purpose: It is used to observe changes over time and understand the long-term effects of
variables or interventions.
Example: Studying the development of children over several years to observe cognitive
growth.

### 8. Cross-Sectional Research Design:

48
Explanation: Cross-sectional research involves collecting data at a single point in time from
different subjects or groups.
Purpose: It provides a snapshot of variables at a specific time and is useful for comparing
different groups.
Example: A survey conducted to study the health habits of people from different age groups.

### 9. Comparative Research Design:

Explanation: Comparative research involves comparing two or more groups, methods, or
treatments to identify differences and similarities.
Purpose: It helps in evaluating the effectiveness of different interventions or conditions.
Example: Comparing the performance of students in two different teaching methods.

### 10. Action Research Design:

Explanation: Action research is conducted by practitioners, often within the context of their
own professional environment, to solve specific problems.
Purpose: It is designed to promote change or improvement in a specific context, combining
theory with practice.
Example: A teacher researching new strategies to improve student engagement in the
classroom.

### Conclusion:
In conclusion, research designs can be broadly classified based on their goals and methods
of data collection. Each type of research design serves a unique purpose, from exploring
new areas to establishing cause-and-effect relationships, and plays a vital role in achieving
the objectives of the study. The choice of research design depends on the research
question, available resources, and the desired outcomes.

7. Discuss the significance of case study method and life history in social science
research.
Answer: A literature review is a critical and systematic evaluation of existing research on a
specific topic. It is an essential component of any research project as it provides context,
justification, and theoretical framework for the study. Below are the key points highlighting
the importance of a literature review in research:

### 1. Provides Background Information:

Explanation: The literature review offers a comprehensive overview of previous studies and
findings on the topic, helping the researcher understand the existing body of knowledge.
Importance: It helps to contextualize the current study and identifies gaps in the literature,
setting the stage for new research.

### 2. Identifies Research Gaps:

Explanation: A thorough review helps identify areas where research is lacking or insufficient.
Importance: Recognizing these gaps allows the researcher to develop research questions
that contribute new knowledge to the field.

### 3. Clarifies Research Questions and Hypotheses:

Explanation: The literature review helps refine the research questions or hypotheses by
building upon previous studies.
Importance: By understanding what has been studied and what remains unexplored,
researchers can pose focused, relevant research questions.

### 4. Builds Theoretical Framework:

Explanation: A literature review helps establish the theoretical foundation for the research by
referencing models, concepts, and theories previously discussed in the field.

49
Importance: This framework guides the design and analysis of the current study, ensuring it
aligns with established knowledge.

### 5. Helps in Research Design and Methodology:

Explanation: By reviewing methods used in past research, a literature review informs the
researcher about the strengths and limitations of various research methodologies.
Importance: This enables the researcher to choose an appropriate research design and
methodology, improving the study’s reliability and validity.

### 6. Avoids Duplication of Effort:

Explanation: A literature review reveals what has already been studied, preventing the
researcher from repeating work that has already been done.
Importance: It ensures that the research offers something new and contributes to the
existing knowledge base rather than duplicating existing efforts.

### 7. Supports the Research Argument:

Explanation: By synthesizing findings from previous studies, the literature review supports
the argument or claims made in the current research.
Importance: It adds credibility to the research, demonstrating that the study is built upon a
sound foundation of existing evidence.

### 8. Provides a Context for Results:

Explanation: The literature review helps in interpreting the results of the current research by
comparing them with previous findings.
Importance: It allows the researcher to understand how their results fit within the broader
context of the field.

### 9. Facilitates New Insights and Directions:

Explanation: Reviewing literature helps identify emerging trends, new ideas, and directions
for further research.
Importance: It stimulates new research questions and innovative approaches to problems,
fostering continuous academic development.

### 10. Enhances Academic and Professional Credibility:

Explanation: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s deep
understanding of the field and shows that they are familiar with relevant scholarly work.
Importance: This enhances the researcher’s credibility and positions their work as a valuable
contribution to the academic community.

### Conclusion:
In conclusion, the literature review is a vital part of the research process. It provides the
necessary background, identifies gaps in knowledge, and helps refine research questions,
methods, and designs. By offering context for the study and supporting the development of a
theoretical framework, the literature review strengthens the overall research and enhances
its credibility and relevance.

50
 Unit 9 Ethnographic Method
1. Discuss the contribution of Malinowski to ethnographic methods in fieldwork.
Answer:
Contribution of Malinowski to Ethnographic Methods in Fieldwork

Bronislaw Malinowski, one of the founding figures in modern anthropology, revolutionized the
ethnographic method and fieldwork, significantly contributing to the development of
qualitative social research. His methodological contributions, particularly his emphasis on
participant observation, cultural relativism, and long-term fieldwork, remain foundational to
ethnographic studies. Below are the key aspects of Malinowski’s contributions:

1. Introduction of Participant Observation:

Malinowski is perhaps best known for popularizing the method of participant observation,
where the researcher immerses themselves in the daily life of the community they are
studying. Unlike earlier anthropologists who conducted research from a distance, often from
a detached perspective, Malinowski emphasized the importance of living among the people,
participating in their activities, and gaining a firsthand understanding of their culture. His
approach was based on the belief that one could not truly understand a society without
becoming an active participant in its day-to-day life.

2. Long-Term Fieldwork:
Malinowski’s fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands (1915-1918) marked a major shift in the
duration of ethnographic studies. He spent several years living with the Trobrianders,
observing their social practices, rituals, and interactions. This long-term engagement allowed
him to gain a deeper and more nuanced understanding of their culture, which would not
have been possible through short-term visits. His fieldwork approach highlighted the
significance of extended engagement to grasp the complexities of a society.

3. Cultural Relativism:
Malinowski promoted cultural relativism, which suggests that cultural practices and beliefs
must be understood within their own context rather than judged by the standards of another
culture. He argued that ethnographers should avoid imposing their own values and biases
on the people they study. This approach was radical at the time, as it called for an
open-minded attitude towards different ways of life and sought to understand societies on
their own terms.

4. Emphasis on Holism:
Malinowski’s ethnographic method was holistic, meaning he sought to understand all
aspects of the society he studied, including its economic, social, political, and religious
dimensions. He viewed these aspects as interconnected and believed that studying one part
of the society in isolation would not provide a complete understanding of the culture. His
holistic approach encouraged ethnographers to consider the broader context of cultural
practices.

5. Theoretical Contribution to Functionalism:

Malinowski was a key figure in the development of functionalism, a theoretical perspective
in anthropology. According to functionalism, cultural practices and institutions serve a
specific function in maintaining the stability and cohesion of society. Malinowski’s fieldwork in
the Trobriand Islands led him to argue that rituals and beliefs were integral to social
functioning, helping to maintain social order and resolve conflicts. His emphasis on
understanding the function of cultural practices influenced subsequent ethnographic
research and theory.

6. Incorporation of Emic and Etic Perspectives:

51
 Malinowski introduced the distinction between the "emic" (insider's perspective) and the
"etic" (outsider's perspective). He emphasized that while the ethnographer must maintain an
objective viewpoint, it is also crucial to understand the culture from the perspective of the
people being studied. This dual approach has been widely adopted in contemporary
ethnographic research.

In conclusion, Malinowski’s contributions to ethnographic methods transformed the way

fieldwork was conducted in anthropology. His advocacy for participant observation, long-term
immersion, cultural relativism, and a holistic understanding of society paved the way for
modern ethnographic research. His legacy continues to influence anthropological fieldwork
and ethnographic methods today.

2. What Ethnography? Examine the use of ethnographic methods in fieldwork.

Answer:### What is Ethnography? Examine the Use of Ethnographic Methods in Fieldwork.

Ethnography is a qualitative research method primarily used in social sciences, especially

anthropology and sociology, to study cultures, behaviors, and social phenomena through
immersive observation and participation. The main goal is to understand how people live,
interact, and make sense of their world. The ethnographer typically spends extended periods
with the group or community under study, participating in their daily activities, and observing
their social interactions and rituals.

#### 1. Definition of Ethnography:

Ethnography involves the systematic study of people and cultures through direct
observation, interviews, and participation in the daily life of the community.
It requires a deep, on-the-ground understanding of the context, where the researcher
becomes part of the environment and collects data through various forms of interaction and
observation.

#### 2. Immersion and Participant Observation:

The ethnographer’s primary tool is immersion in the community being studied. This involves
living and engaging with the people over extended periods.
Participant observation is key in ethnography. The researcher not only observes but often
actively participates in the community’s routines, rituals, and social interactions, which
provides deeper insights into the culture.

#### 3. Use of Ethnography in Fieldwork:

Cultural Context: Ethnography allows researchers to understand the culture and social
dynamics in their natural setting. This approach reveals how behaviors and practices relate
to the broader social, historical, and political contexts.
Empathy and Understanding: By living with the people they study, ethnographers develop
empathy and a more nuanced understanding of cultural practices and values, which helps
break down stereotypes and misinterpretations.
Holistic Data Collection: Ethnography provides a holistic view of a community, incorporating
both the subjective and objective aspects of cultural life, including the emotional, symbolic,
and ritualistic dimensions of society.

#### 4. Merits of Ethnographic Method:

Deep Insight into Social Phenomena: Through direct participation and long-term observation,
ethnographers can uncover the underlying meanings of behaviors, rituals, and practices. For
example, studying a ritual dance might reveal its role in fostering social cohesion beyond its
immediate goal (e.g., causing rain).
Empathy and Respect for Cultures: Ethnography promotes an understanding of other
cultures from within, creating a more empathetic approach to cultural differences.

52
Revealing Hidden Social Dynamics: Ethnographers often discover hidden aspects of society,
such as gender roles or power structures, that would not be accessible through other
methods.

#### 5. Demerits of Ethnographic Method:

Subjectivity and Bias: Ethnographic research is not free from bias. The ethnographer’s own
position, identity, and perspective inevitably influence the interpretation of data. This can
lead to subjective findings, as seen in the controversy between Margaret Mead and Derek
Freeman.
Time and Resource Intensive: The method requires prolonged fieldwork, often lasting
months or even years, which can be resource-intensive and impractical in certain contexts.
Acceptance Issues: Researchers may face resistance from the community they study,
especially if there are ideological or cultural differences, limiting their ability to gain trust and
access.

#### Conclusion:
Ethnographic methods in fieldwork are powerful tools for gaining a deep, contextual
understanding of social and cultural practices. Despite challenges such as bias, time
constraints, and potential resistance from the community, the ethnographic approach offers
rich, qualitative data that other methods may not provide. It allows for a comprehensive,
empathetic exploration of cultures and social structures, contributing significantly to
anthropological and sociological knowledge.

3. What is Malinowski's contribution to fieldwork?

Answer: Malinowski’s Contribution to Fieldwork

Bronislaw Malinowski is often regarded as one of the founding figures of modern

anthropological fieldwork. His contributions to the development of ethnography and field
research have had a profound and lasting impact on the discipline. Here is a point-wise
overview of his contributions:

1. Participant Observation:
Malinowski is most famous for popularizing the method of *participant observation*, which
became a cornerstone of ethnographic research. This approach emphasizes that
researchers should immerse themselves in the community they are studying, participate in
daily activities, and build relationships with the people to understand their culture from an
insider’s perspective.
Unlike earlier anthropologists, who relied on secondary sources and distant observation,
Malinowski’s approach encouraged deep, direct engagement with the community being
studied.

2. Fieldwork in the Trobriand Islands:

His most significant fieldwork was conducted in the Trobriand Islands (1915-1918), where he
lived among the indigenous people for several years. This allowed him to develop a deep
understanding of their social structure, culture, and practices, such as the Kula ring (a
ceremonial exchange system).
His detailed documentation of Trobriand society marked a major shift in anthropological
research, emphasizing the importance of prolonged immersion in the field.

3. Emphasis on the *Emic* Perspective:

Malinowski stressed the importance of studying a culture from the *emic* perspective, or the
viewpoint of the people being studied, rather than imposing external frameworks. This
approach helped researchers gain a more nuanced and authentic understanding of the
community’s beliefs, values, and practices.

53
He encouraged anthropologists to learn the local language and understand the local
worldview, which he saw as essential for gathering accurate data.

4. Functionalism in Anthropology:
Malinowski’s functionalist approach to anthropology proposed that every cultural practice,
belief, and institution serves a function in maintaining the stability and cohesion of society.
His perspective contrasted with structuralism and emphasized how social practices and
institutions work together to fulfill the needs of individuals and society, including economic,
emotional, and social needs.

5. Integration of Theory with Fieldwork:

Malinowski was one of the first anthropologists to integrate fieldwork with theoretical
analysis. He believed that ethnography should not just be descriptive but should also be
used to develop general theories about human culture and society.
His work in the Trobriand Islands contributed not only to the understanding of the people but
also to the development of a scientific theory of social organization and culture.

6. Rejection of Armchair Anthropology:

Malinowski rejected the armchair anthropology that was prevalent in the early 20th century,
where researchers would make broad generalizations about cultures without firsthand
experience. He emphasized that anthropology should be based on direct observation and
engagement in the field.

7. Ethnographic Writing:
His writing style was characterized by its attention to detail and vivid descriptions of
everyday life. He sought to present an accurate portrayal of the people he studied, focusing
on how they understood and lived their lives in their own terms.

8. Legacy and Influence:

Malinowski’s methods and theories have influenced generations of anthropologists, and his
emphasis on fieldwork, participant observation, and the *emic* perspective remains central
to ethnographic research today.
His approach to anthropology set the standard for future anthropologists to conduct
extensive, immersive fieldwork and to produce comprehensive, detailed ethnographies.

In conclusion, Malinowski’s contributions to fieldwork revolutionized anthropological research

by introducing the importance of participant observation, emphasizing the emic perspective,
integrating theory with practice, and promoting long-term, immersive fieldwork. His legacy
continues to shape the methods and approaches used in contemporary anthropology.

4. Discuss emerging trends in use of ethnographic methods.

Answer: ### Emerging Trends in the Use of Ethnographic Methods

Ethnographic methods have evolved significantly in recent years due to technological

advancements and changing research environments. Below are key emerging trends:

1. Digital Ethnography:
The rise of the internet has introduced virtual ethnography as a prominent trend.
Researchers are now conducting studies in online spaces like social networking sites, blogs,
and forums, providing new insights into online communities.
Social networking platforms allow ethnographers to observe social interactions and collect
data without being physically present. Researchers can interact with participants or observe
group dynamics in a digital space, offering a non-invasive method of gathering data on
marginalized or hard-to-reach groups.

54
2. Use of Multimedia Data:
Digital ethnography has facilitated access to vast amounts of multimedia material, including
images, videos, and text, from social media platforms, blogs, and other online resources.
These media provide a rich, diverse data set that enhances ethnographic analysis,
particularly in documenting marginal social movements.
Researchers can study the use of visual content, such as photos and videos, to understand
the cultural and social dynamics within specific groups, adding depth to traditional
ethnographic observations.

3. Focus Groups on Social Media:

Social media platforms are increasingly being used for conducting virtual focus groups.
These platforms allow researchers to engage participants in discussions, post embedded
videos, and gather feedback on a variety of topics. This trend provides greater accessibility
for people with disabilities or those who are difficult to reach physically.

4. Invisibility and Unobtrusiveness:

One of the major advantages of digital ethnography is the ability for researchers to invisibly
observe interactions within online communities. This method eliminates the presence of an
outsider and allows the ethnographer to study social behavior and group dynamics without
influencing them.
Such unobtrusive observation enables researchers to gather data that might otherwise be
unavailable through traditional methods.

5. Ethnography in Focused Digital Communities:

Social researchers are increasingly creating online spaces, such as research-focused social
media pages or dedicated blogs, to interact directly with participants. This controlled
environment allows researchers to obtain focused responses and engage with participants in
real-time discussions, further enhancing data collection processes.
Research pages, like the ‘Cure Diabetes’ MySpace page mentioned in the text, offer a
structured environment for collecting public opinions and feedback from targeted
demographics.

6. Inclusivity and Accessibility:

Digital platforms can provide increased inclusivity by allowing researchers to engage with
people who may otherwise be marginalized due to geographical, physical, or social barriers.
Disabled individuals or remote communities who might have limited access to traditional
forms of research can now actively participate, making digital ethnography a powerful tool for
inclusive studies.

7. Integration with Traditional Methods:

Despite the rise of digital tools, ethnographers continue to use traditional face-to-face
methods alongside digital ethnography. This integration enables researchers to combine the
richness of in-person interactions with the breadth and convenience of digital data collection,
creating a more comprehensive research framework.

In conclusion, ethnographic methods are rapidly adapting to the digital age, with new trends
focusing on virtual communities, multimedia data, increased inclusivity, and the integration of
digital tools alongside traditional methods. These developments make ethnography more
flexible, dynamic, and capable of addressing the challenges of modern research.

5. Discuss how ethnography developed as a method of social research,

Answer: ### Development of Ethnography as a Method of Social Research

1. Origins in Anthropology: Ethnography originated in anthropology as a method to study

cultures through immersive fieldwork. Early anthropologists sought to understand distant or

55
indigenous cultures by directly observing and participating in their daily lives, a practice that
became foundational to ethnographic research.

2. Influence of Early Scholars: Key anthropologists such as Franz Boas, Bronisław

Malinowski, and Ruth Benedict shaped ethnography as a methodological tool. Malinowski, in
particular, emphasized participant observation, advocating for long-term immersion in a
community, allowing researchers to understand cultural practices from the perspective of the
people being studied.

3. Development of Participant Observation: A central feature of ethnography is participant

observation, where researchers not only observe but also engage in the daily activities of the
community. This method allows for a deeper understanding of social practices and rituals,
providing richer insights than mere observation would.

4. Holistic Approach: Ethnography was developed as a holistic approach, aiming to

understand a culture in its entirety. This includes the study of social structures, rituals,
beliefs, and interactions within a given community. Researchers strive to interpret social
phenomena within their cultural context rather than applying external frameworks or
assumptions.

5. Increased Focus on Social Context: Over time, ethnography shifted from a focus on
isolated cultural practices to examining how social phenomena are situated within larger
social, political, and historical contexts. This development expanded the scope of
ethnographic research, moving beyond isolated tribes and indigenous populations to include
modern, urban, and complex social groups.

6. Critique of Positivism: Ethnography arose as a counterpoint to positivist approaches in

social research, which relied on detached, objective data collection methods. Ethnographers
emphasized the importance of subjectivity and the researcher’s role in interpreting and
understanding cultural meanings. This stance recognized the role of the researcher’s own
perspective in the research process, a theme that gained prominence in the mid-20th
century.

7. Integration with Other Disciplines: While rooted in anthropology, ethnographic methods

were gradually integrated into other disciplines such as sociology, education, and political
science. This expansion allowed ethnography to be used to study a broader range of social
groups, including marginalized communities, organizations, and institutions.

8. Technological Integration: In recent years, the development of digital ethnography,

enabled by the internet and social media, has expanded the scope of ethnography even
further. Researchers now use digital platforms to study online communities, social
movements, and virtual interactions, broadening the reach of ethnographic methods.

9. Refinement of Ethical Considerations: The evolution of ethnography also involved a

growing awareness of ethical issues, particularly regarding the researcher’s relationship with
the community. Ethical guidelines have developed to ensure that ethnographers maintain
respect for the privacy and autonomy of the people they study, minimizing harm while
conducting research.

10. Contemporary Relevance: Today, ethnography continues to evolve, incorporating new

techniques, such as visual and sensory ethnography, and adapting to the changing
landscape of social research. Despite critiques of its subjectivity, ethnography remains a
valuable tool for gaining deep, contextual insights into human behavior and social structures.

56
In conclusion, ethnography has developed as a comprehensive and flexible research
method that emphasizes immersion, context, and holistic understanding. Its evolution
reflects the growing recognition of the complexity of social life and the need to explore it
through an empathetic and contextually grounded approach.

6. Outline distinguishing features of ethnographic research.

Answer: ### Distinguishing Features of Ethnographic Research:

1. Immersive Fieldwork:
Ethnographic research involves the researcher immersing themselves in the daily lives of the
people they are studying, often for extended periods. This enables the researcher to observe
and participate in the activities and rituals of the community, providing a deep, firsthand
understanding of their culture and social dynamics.

2. Participant Observation:
One of the core techniques in ethnography is participant observation, where the researcher
not only observes but also engages in the community’s activities. This interaction allows for
a more authentic understanding of the culture, helping to uncover insights that might be
hidden from an outside observer.

3. Holistic Approach:
Ethnographic research adopts a holistic perspective, meaning it examines the society or
group in its entirety, considering social, cultural, economic, and historical factors. The aim is
to understand how different aspects of life are interrelated within the specific cultural context.

4. Qualitative Data Collection:

Ethnography primarily focuses on qualitative data, emphasizing depth over breadth. The
researcher collects data through interviews, direct observation, and participation, and this
information is typically descriptive and narrative, aiming to capture the lived experiences of
people in their natural settings.

5. Emphasis on Context:
A defining characteristic of ethnographic research is its focus on the context of social
behaviors. Researchers aim to understand the meaning and functions of cultural practices,
rituals, and social interactions within the environment in which they occur. This provides a
richer, more nuanced interpretation of social phenomena.

6. Cultural Sensitivity and Empathy:

Ethnographic research encourages researchers to develop empathy for the people they
study. This empathy fosters a deeper understanding and respect for different cultures and
helps ensure that the researcher’s interpretations are as unbiased and accurate as possible.

7. Ethnographic Writing:
The findings of ethnographic research are often presented in detailed ethnographies, which
are narrative accounts of the researcher’s experiences, observations, and analysis. These
works offer a comprehensive picture of the community or group, blending descriptions with
theoretical interpretations.

8. Long-Term Engagement:
Ethnographic studies typically require long-term engagement with the community. This
prolonged exposure enables the researcher to gain trust, understand the complexities of
social interactions, and document changes over time, leading to a more thorough and
accurate analysis.

9. Flexible Research Design:

57
Ethnography is often characterized by its flexible research design. Unlike quantitative
research, which follows a fixed structure, ethnographic research evolves as the researcher
gains more insights and understands the community’s dynamics. This adaptability allows for
a more organic discovery process.

10. Subjectivity and Reflexivity:

A distinguishing feature of ethnography is the recognition of the researcher’s subjective role
in the research process. Researchers must be reflexive, acknowledging their biases, cultural
perspectives, and influence on the study, which helps to maintain transparency and integrity
in the research process.

In conclusion, ethnographic research is marked by its immersive, holistic, and qualitative

approach to understanding human societies. Its strengths lie in the depth of understanding it
provides about cultural practices, while its flexibility and focus on context ensure that findings
are rich and relevant to the specific social settings studied.

7. Explain different ways of recording data in fieldwork.

Answer: ### Different Ways of Recording Data in Fieldwork:

1. Field Notes:
One of the most common and foundational methods for recording data in fieldwork is
through field notes.
Ethnographers record detailed observations, experiences, and reflections during their
interactions with the community.
Notes can be written during or after an observation session, and they often include
descriptions of people, behaviors, settings, and events.
These notes provide context and insights into the researcher’s own interpretations and
experiences.
Field notes are invaluable as they capture nuanced details that may not be evident in other
data forms.

2. Audio and Video Recording:

Using audio or video recordings allows researchers to capture the actual words, behaviors,
and interactions within the community being studied.
This method helps preserve the authenticity of the interactions and reduces the risk of
misinterpretation or bias.
Video recordings can be particularly useful in studying non-verbal cues such as body
language, facial expressions, and group dynamics.
Audio recordings can be transcribed later, making it easier to analyze verbal data such as
interviews, conversations, or group discussions.

3. Photographs:
Photographs are a visual representation of the field environment and participants, providing
a rich and immediate way to document the setting.
These images can capture aspects of social life, cultural practices, and rituals that may be
difficult to convey through written descriptions alone.
Photographs also serve as a visual reference, helping researchers remember specific events
or details that might be difficult to recall through written notes alone.
Ethical considerations regarding consent must be observed when using photographs in
fieldwork, especially in sensitive communities.

4. Surveys and Questionnaires:

Surveys and questionnaires are structured methods for collecting data, often used to gather
quantitative data or standardized information from a larger group of people.

58
These tools can complement ethnographic methods by providing broader patterns and
comparisons across different groups or settings.
They can be distributed in person, online, or through other means, and can include both
closed and open-ended questions.

5. Interviews:
Structured, semi-structured, or unstructured interviews are commonly used to gather
qualitative data.
Interviews allow the researcher to probe deeply into specific topics and explore individual
experiences, beliefs, and perspectives.
Recorded interviews, whether audio or video, provide an accurate account of the
participants’ responses, ensuring no details are missed in the analysis process.

6. Participant Observation:
In participant observation, the researcher immerses themselves in the community, not only
observing but actively participating in the activities and social life of the group.
This allows for a deeper understanding of the context, relationships, and behaviors that
might not be visible to an outsider.
Fieldwork data can be recorded through direct observation, participation notes, and reflective
journaling, offering insights into both the overt and covert aspects of social life.

7. Digital Tools:
With the rise of technology, digital tools like social media platforms, blogs, and online forums
are becoming increasingly important in fieldwork.
Researchers may analyze digital interactions and create virtual ethnographies to understand
online communities.
Data from these sources can be recorded using screenshots, digital notes, or software
designed for qualitative analysis.

8. Artifacts and Documents:

Researchers may also record and analyze physical artifacts, documents, or cultural
materials that are significant within the community.
This could include items like newspapers, letters, artwork, religious texts, or other materials
that help contextualize the study.
These materials provide important insights into the values, beliefs, and practices of the
group being studied.

In conclusion, fieldwork data can be recorded in multiple ways, each offering unique
advantages and challenges. The method chosen often depends on the research goals, the
community being studied, and the resources available. Combining multiple data recording
techniques can provide a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the social
phenomena under investigation.

59
 Unit 13 : IDENTIFYING A RESEARCH PROBLEM

1. What do you understand about the 'Research Problem'? Outline the major steps in
identification of a research problem.
Answer: ### Understanding a Research Problem and Steps for Identification

#### What is a Research Problem?

1. Definition:
A research problem is a condition or situation that stimulates curiosity in a researcher.
It seeks answers to questions, clarifies doubts, or challenges existing knowledge.

2. Characteristics:
It involves a situation where there is doubt about alternatives or solutions.
It must have:
An individual or group facing a problem.
Specific objectives to achieve.
Multiple courses of action to evaluate.
Uncertainty in choosing the best alternative.
Situations where the difficulty can be solved.

3. Trigger for Research Problem:

The problem arises from doubts and observations born out of curiosity, leading to questions
like *how, what, where, when,* and *why.*

#### Major Steps in Identifying a Research Problem

1. Preliminary Study:
Begin with an overview of the topic of interest to gather basic understanding and context.

2. Choose a Broad Subject:

Select a subject that interests both the researcher and readers.
Example: Exploring the impact of urbanization on child labor.

3. Specify a Topic:
Narrow the subject into a specific topic that is researchable and allows for interesting
arguments.

4. Avoid Common Pitfalls:

Do not select vague, irrelevant, or overworked topics.
Avoid controversial topics unless adequately prepared.

5. Consider Researcher’s Capacity:

The chosen problem should align with the researcher’s skills, resources, and time
constraints.

6. Understand the Problem's Nature and Scope:

Conduct a literature review to gain deeper insights into the problem.
Engage in discussions with experts or individuals familiar with the issue.

7. Determine Feasibility:
Ensure the problem can be studied within the constraints of time, money, and expertise.
Narrow the research question to a specific, manageable scope.

8. State the Research Problem:

60
Clearly define the problem, including its key questions (*how, what, where, when,* and
*why*).

9. Prepare a Research Design:

Develop a research design to organize efforts efficiently.
The design serves as a blueprint for data collection, analysis, and interpretation.

By following these steps, a researcher ensures the selection of a relevant, manageable, and
impactful research problem.

2. What is the importance of a research problem?

Answer:
1. Core of Research:
The research problem is the foundation of any research study.
A well-formulated problem guides the entire research process and ensures successful
outcomes.

2. Critical Role in Research:

Formulating a research problem requires substantial knowledge of the subject and research
methodology.
A good research problem withstands scrutiny and facilitates a clear research process.

3. Key Factors for Selecting a Research Problem:

Topic:
The topic must be interesting to sustain the researcher’s motivation.
Avoid overdone, narrow, or vague topics.
Expertise:
Researchers must possess a sound understanding of the subject and methodology.
Conducting a preliminary or pilot survey helps refine the research problem.
Supervisors provide guidance, but the researcher is responsible for the work.
Availability of Data:
Ensure sufficient data availability before finalizing the topic.
Difficult-to-access data sources (e.g., census, reports) require careful planning.
Relevance:
The problem must align with the researcher’s interests and profession.
It should contribute to existing knowledge and sustain research efforts.

4. Ethics in Research:
Research often involves individuals, groups, or organizations, requiring ethical
considerations.
Ethical principles include loyalty, honesty, integrity, and transparency.
Key ethical practices:
Respect participants’ time by preparing focused interviews and questionnaires.
Respect privacy and avoid offending or embarrassing participants.
Obtain a recommendation letter or introduction from the supervisor or institution.
Carry an identity card to establish credibility and purpose.

5. Sustainability of Research:
Research demands time, effort, and constant performance.
A relevant, well-chosen problem ensures long-term engagement and productivity.

6. Ethical Benefits:
Thoughtful preparation minimizes time wastage and builds trust with participants.
Proper ethical conduct safeguards future research opportunities and enhances credibility.

61
By investing time and effort in selecting and formulating a research problem, a researcher
lays the groundwork for meaningful and impactful research.

3. Where to Look for a Research Problem.

Answer:
1. Importance of Selecting a Research Problem:
The success of research depends on a well-chosen research problem.
A researcher must identify a problem that aligns with their intellectual interest and research
goals.
Factors to consider include the subject's importance, guidance availability, literature review,
personal experiences, and financial feasibility.

2. Key Sources of Research Problems (S.L. Sharma, 1982):

Research Supervisor: Supervisors guide students in identifying and clarifying research
problems by recommending relevant literature.
Research Literature: Books and journals help explore unexplored areas, challenge existing
theories, or propose new questions.
Research Funding Agencies: Funding is critical for research expenses, including fees,
fieldwork, and resources.

3. Personal Interest and Engagement:

Research requires intellectual curiosity and intrinsic motivation.
A researcher must immerse themselves in the subject, understand its nature, and review
extensive literature.
Personal interest ensures sustained engagement and successful completion.

4. Consultation with Experts:

Discussions with experts or individuals familiar with similar problems help refine ambiguous
research problems.
Expert insights provide clarity and understanding of the problem's origin and purpose.

5. Review of Previous Studies:

Literature review broadens knowledge, highlights gaps, and strengthens arguments.
Selective reading of relevant topics saves time and enhances focus.
Collaboration with researchers addressing similar issues can provide new perspectives.

6. Demand from People/Community:

Social disruptions often create a demand for research to address public issues.
Researchers contribute by producing knowledge that offers remedies for societal challenges.

7. Demand from Government/Civil Society:

Civil societies push for reforms, and governments legislate based on these demands (e.g.,
NOTA in India).
Both entities are interdependent, creating and implementing new ideas to address societal
needs.

8. Relevance to Contemporary Situations:

Research must align with current social, political, and economic contexts.
Example: Comparing historical peasant movements with modern farmers’ protests to reflect
evolving demands and challenges.

By systematically identifying a research problem through these steps, researchers can

ensure their work is impactful, relevant, and sustainable.

4. The exploratory or formulative research;

62
Answer: Exploratory research is conducted to investigate a problem that is not clearly
defined or understood. It serves as the foundation for more structured and detailed studies.

#### Definition:
- Focuses on exploring ideas and gathering preliminary insights.
- Aims to identify potential variables and relationships.

#### Objectives:
1. Gain familiarity with a phenomenon or concept.
2. Develop hypotheses for future research.
3. Identify key issues and variables for further investigation.

#### Characteristics:
1. Flexible and Open-Ended:
No rigid framework; the research evolves as new data is discovered.
2. Preliminary Nature:
Provides insights but does not offer conclusive evidence.
3. Qualitative in Nature:
Often uses qualitative methods like interviews, focus groups, or observations.
4. Broad Scope:
Explores a wide range of possibilities without narrowing down to specific questions.
5. Foundation for Further Research:
Sets the stage for descriptive, diagnostic, or causal studies.

#### Methods Used:

1. Literature Review:
Examines existing research to identify gaps and build a theoretical framework.
2. Interviews and Focus Groups:
Gathers insights from individuals or groups familiar with the subject.
3. Observation:
Explores behaviors and patterns in natural settings.
4. Case Studies:
Investigates a single entity in-depth to understand complex issues.

#### Applications:
1. Product Development:
Understanding consumer preferences for a new product idea.
2. Market Research:
Identifying emerging trends or customer needs in unexplored markets.
3. Social Research:
Investigating cultural attitudes toward mental health or education.

#### Limitations:
1. Lack of Structure:
May lack clear objectives or defined methods.
2. Non-Generalizable Results:
Findings are often context-specific and not statistically robust.
3. Time-Consuming:
Requires extensive exploration and analysis.

#### Example:
- A company exploring the reasons for low brand awareness before launching a new
marketing campaign.

63
Exploratory research is a vital initial step in the research process, offering valuable insights
and setting the groundwork for more detailed studies.

2. Provide the accurate characteristics of a particular individuals, situation or a group

which is termed as descriptive research;
Answer: Descriptive research is used to accurately describe characteristics of individuals,
groups, situations, or phenomena. It focuses on answering the "what," "where," and "how"
questions, without delving into "why."

#### Definition:
- Aims to systematically describe a subject without manipulating it.
- Provides a snapshot of current conditions or trends.

#### Objectives:
1. Accurately represent the characteristics of a group, situation, or phenomenon.
2. Identify patterns or trends.
3. Provide a foundation for further research or decision-making.

#### Characteristics:
1. Structured and Systematic:
Uses well-defined procedures to ensure accuracy and reliability.
2. Quantitative or Qualitative:
Data can be numerical (quantitative) or observational (qualitative).
3. Non-Manipulative:
The researcher observes and records without altering the environment.
4. Snapshot of a Situation:
Describes the current state of affairs at a specific point in time.
5. Specific Focus:
Clearly defined objectives guide the research.

#### Methods Used:

1. Surveys and Questionnaires:
Collect data from a large sample population.
2. Observations:
Record behaviors or events in their natural settings.
3. Case Studies:
In-depth analysis of a single individual, group, or situation.
4. Document Analysis:
Examination of existing records, such as census reports or organizational data.

#### Applications:
1. Demographics Studies:
Census surveys detailing age, gender, or income distribution in a population.
2. Customer Satisfaction:
Evaluating satisfaction levels in a specific market.
3. Behavioral Studies:
Observing classroom behaviors to identify learning patterns.

#### Advantages:
1. Provides accurate and reliable data.
2. Useful for identifying trends and patterns.
3. Offers a foundation for decision-making.

#### Limitations:
1. Does not analyze cause-effect relationships.

64
2. Data is limited to what is observed or measured.
3. Findings may lack depth in exploring underlying reasons.

#### Example:
- A survey on internet usage habits among teenagers in urban areas.

Descriptive research is essential for understanding the characteristics of a subject, helping

researchers and decision-makers make informed choices based on current realities.

3. Establish the frequency in which something occurs or with which it is associated

with something else which is termed as diagnostic research.
Answer: Diagnostic research seeks to determine the frequency with which something
occurs or is associated with another factor. It focuses on identifying relationships, patterns,
and causes, often bridging exploratory and explanatory research.

#### Definition:
- Aims to identify the causes of a problem and understand its associations.
- Often used to diagnose issues and prescribe solutions.

#### Objectives:
1. Establish the frequency or pattern of occurrences.
2. Analyze relationships between variables.
3. Identify causes or contributing factors to a problem.
4. Provide actionable insights for addressing identified issues.

#### Characteristics:
1. Focused on Relationships:
Studies correlations between variables to understand associations.
2. Structured Approach:
Employs predefined hypotheses or research questions.
3. Quantitative Orientation:
Relies on statistical techniques to analyze data and identify patterns.
4. Practical Relevance:
Aims to provide actionable insights for solving real-world problems.
5. Combination of Methods:
Combines elements of descriptive and exploratory research.

#### Methods Used:

1. Surveys and Questionnaires:
Collect data to measure the frequency of specific behaviors or occurrences.
2. Experiments:
Test hypotheses under controlled conditions to identify cause-effect relationships.
3. Observations:
Record occurrences and their contexts to identify patterns.
4. Statistical Analysis:
Use correlation, regression, or chi-square tests to analyze relationships.

#### Applications:
1. Healthcare:
Diagnosing factors contributing to the prevalence of a disease.
2. Education:
Investigating the link between study habits and academic performance.
3. Business:
Analyzing customer complaints to identify causes of dissatisfaction.

65
#### Advantages:
1. Provides insights into causal relationships.
2. Helps identify patterns and associations.
3. Supports decision-making by pinpointing areas for intervention.

#### Limitations:
1. May require large, high-quality datasets.
2. Correlation does not always imply causation.
3. Findings may need further validation through additional research.

#### Example:
- Investigating the frequency and causes of employee absenteeism in a company and its
correlation with job satisfaction.

Diagnostic research is a powerful tool for identifying and addressing problems by

understanding their causes and associations, enabling effective solutions.

66
 Unit 14: PREPARING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
1. What is a Research Proposal?
Answer: A research proposal is a formal document that presents a plan for a research
project. It is typically written by a researcher or academic in order to secure funding,
approval, or support for their study. A well-written research proposal outlines the research's
objectives, methodology, and significance, offering a comprehensive blueprint for the
proposed research. The acceptance of a research proposal depends on several key factors:

#### 1. Relevance to the Organization's Interests

The proposed research must align with the priorities or interests of the institution or
organization to which it is being submitted. A proposal addressing issues or topics that fall
outside the scope of the organization’s focus is unlikely to be approved. Understanding the
institution’s goals and objectives is critical for crafting a proposal that meets their
expectations.

#### 2. Clear Enumeration of Relevant Areas

The proposal must specify the areas or fields of study that are relevant to the research.
This involves providing a clear definition of the research problem, objectives, and the context
in which the study will be carried out. A good proposal will not only identify the research
problem but also explain why it is significant and how it fits into the existing body of
knowledge.

#### 3. Coherence and Conviction

A successful research proposal must be logically structured and free of contradictions. The
content should flow logically from the introduction to the conclusion, making it easy for the
reader to follow. Each section should build on the previous one, maintaining a consistent
narrative that convincingly argues the need for the proposed study. Contradictory statements
or unclear explanations can lead to confusion and ultimately result in rejection.

#### 4. Detailed Timeframe

A research proposal should outline a timeline for the completion of the research. Whether
broad or detailed, the timeline should reflect the various phases of the research process,
including data collection, analysis, and report writing. A clear and realistic timeline helps the
reviewing body understand how the research will progress and ensures that the project is
completed within a feasible time frame.

#### 5. Feasibility and Resources

The proposal should address the feasibility of the research by detailing the resources,
tools, and methods that will be used. This includes information about the required funding,
personnel, equipment, and facilities. A well-planned proposal demonstrates that the
researcher has considered the practical aspects of conducting the study.

#### 6. Methodological Approach

The proposal should provide a clear outline of the research methods that will be employed.
This includes qualitative or quantitative approaches, data collection methods, and analytical
techniques. The methodology should be appropriate for the research question and capable
of yielding reliable results.

#### Conclusion
In summary, a research proposal is a critical document that outlines a researcher’s plan for
investigating a particular issue or topic. To be accepted, the proposal must be relevant to the
institution’s objectives, logically structured, clear, and feasible within the given timeframe.
The clarity and coherence of the proposal, combined with a well-defined methodology and
timeline, are key factors that contribute to its success.

67
2. Outline the structure or steps of a research proposal.
Answer:
1. Cover Page
Purpose: The first page of the research proposal.
Elements:
Title of the research proposal.
Date/month and year of submission.
Name and contact details of the researcher(s).
Name of the organization or institution where the proposal is being submitted.

2. Title Page
Purpose: Provides detailed information about the research proposal.
Elements:
Title of the Research Proposal: Clear, concise, and informative, ideally restricted to one
line.
Submitted by: Name, address, and contact details of the submitting entity (individual or
organization).
Submitted to: Name and address of the receiving organization.
Initiated by: Name and details of the person or organization initiating the proposal (if
different).
Principal Investigator: Name and contact details of the principal investigator, if available.

3. Abstract
Purpose: Provides a concise summary of the research proposal.
Content:
A brief enumeration of the research problem, objectives, hypothesis, methodology, and
justification.
Typically one or two pages long.

4. Introduction
Purpose: Explains the research problem and its background.
Content:
What needs to be studied: Overview of the research topic.
Rationale: Justification for the research, including the gaps it intends to fill.
Objective and relevance: Why the research is important in the given context.

5. Review of Literature
Purpose: Provides an overview of existing research related to the topic.
Content:
Summary of relevant studies and how the proposed research will add to or build on existing
knowledge.
A prioritized list of references, with less important ones placed in an appendix.

6. Objectives
Purpose: Specifies the goals of the research.
Content:
Clear definition of the problem.
Hypothesis or research questions that the study seeks to answer or test.

7. Methodology
Purpose: Describes how the research will be conducted.
Content:
Sample size and criteria: Details of the sample to be studied.
Variables: Explanation of the variables and the methods of studying them.
Data collection: Methods (e.g., interviews, surveys) and tools used for gathering data.

68
 Timeline: Detailed timeline for each phase of the research, including flowcharts.

8. Human Resource
Purpose: Provides information about the research team.
Content:
Details of the Principal Investigator and any advisory committee.
Relevant qualifications and experience of team members.

9. Financial Details
Purpose: Outlines the budget for the research project.
Content:
Direct Costs: Salaries, travel allowances, equipment, supplies, communication, printing,
and rent.
Indirect Costs: Shared costs like building maintenance and general administration.
Grand Total: Sum of direct and indirect costs, including contingency funds.
Consultation with the funding organization's controller if additional expenses arise.

10. Conclusion
The proposal should present a clear, realistic plan, justifying the need for the research and
providing a comprehensive methodology for achieving the research goals.

3. Important Issues in Writing a Research Proposal.

Answer:
1. Key Aspects of Research Proposal Writing
A research proposal must demonstrate accuracy, brevity, clarity, details, and proper English.
These elements are essential for effectively presenting the research idea during the
preparatory stage.

2. Accuracy
Conduct a thorough literature review to understand existing research on related topics.
Identify gaps in knowledge to justify the novelty of your research.
Example: For a proposal on mobile phone usage by refugees in India, review global and
local studies to establish context and identify gaps such as the role of income or gender.
Accurate facts ensure realistic claims and provide a strong foundation for your research.

3. Brevity
Divide information into main points and additional points:
Main points should include objectives, key questions, and rationale.
Additional points provide justifications for the questions.
Keep the proposal short and crisp, focusing on essential aspects.
Example: Highlight your main research questions and methodologies while keeping
explanations concise.

4. Clarity
Ensure clarity at two levels:
Understanding: Clearly define the objectives, needs, and benefits of the research.
Communication: Present concepts and theories in straightforward terms. Avoid
unnecessary complexity.
Example: Explain objectives like understanding mobile phone usage among refugees, its
impact, and the benefits of the study.

5. Details in the Proposal

Segregate and refine important details:
What is to be done?: Include an introduction outlining the research focus (e.g., studying
mobile phone usage by refugees).

69
 Why is it done?: Explain the rationale, highlighting gaps in existing research and the
relevance of the study.
How it is to be done?: Detail the methodology, including:
Research design (qualitative/quantitative).
Sample size and selection method.
Data collection and analysis techniques.
Example: Propose a qualitative study using interviews with a sample of 100 refugees to
understand gender-based differences in mobile phone use.

6. Backup Information
Prepare additional details as backup for presentations or appendices.
Keep supporting information accessible but exclude it from the main proposal unless
required.
Example: Provide extended literature review findings or detailed statistics during a proposal
defense session.

7. Conclusion
A well-structured research proposal should effectively communicate its objectives,
relevance, and methodology.
Balancing accuracy, brevity, and clarity ensures the proposal is compelling and precise.

70