GPGP
GPGP
Instructors
Sudip Gupta
Affiliation: The Johns Hopkins University Carey Business School
Contact: [email protected]
Nagpurnanand Prabhala
Affiliation: The Johns Hopkins University Carey Business School
Contact: [email protected]
Overview
This is an advanced course in corporate finance, focusing on the interface of firms with
financial markets. We will emphasize the form and financing of the firm. Pedagogy is
principally through cases. The course will examine the capital raising and financing strategies
of private and public firms. On most occasions, we take the perspective of the firm responsible
for the financing activity. However, we will often look at the same transaction from the
complementary viewpoints of the participating financial intermediary such as a venture
capitalist, an investment bank, or an investor in the issuing firm. We cover a wide range of
capital market transactions ranging from simple to complex instruments by private and
publicly listed firms. For private firms, we focus on the motivation, structuring and valuation
issues involved in the important financing avenue of venture capital.
The intended audience for this course includes not only aspirants to careers in investment
banking or leadership roles in corporate finance but also those interested in consulting careers.
Students intending to manage family businesses and budding entrepreneurs find the course useful
as they go through the life cycles of the businesses they run. A particular feature of the course is
exposure to a variety of industries and decision-making contexts.
Group formation
Class participants will be organized into groups of a minimum of four and at the most five
students. Please ensure within-group diversity to maximize learning. Group composition may
not be altered during the term. Groups will NOT be formed across sections.
Learning goals
There are three learning objectives:
1
i. Critical and integrative thinking ii.
Effective oral communication
iii. Interpersonal awareness and working in teams
The first learning objective is critical and integrative thinking. In each case, you will put
yourselves in the shoes of a decision maker facing an issue that requires making an important
decision. You will develop the ability to distil the major issues, develop alternative strategies to
deal with them, and evaluate each alternative in a coherent manner. Putting yourself in the shoes
of a decision-maker is the best way to understand finance theory and apply it. What is the
difference between theory and its application? Theories are important as they provide us useful
insights and ways of thinking about problems. Thus, theoretical rigor underpins virtually every
case in some way or another. However, the challenge is to use theory to generate insights useful
for practical decision-making – rather than treat it as a constraint that limits your thinking. In
keeping with this philosophy, we will focus class time on theory in live action. We will focus on
analyzing specific decisions faced by firms and the application of theoretical concepts rather than
on understanding textbook theories themselves.
In most cases, there is rarely one “correct” answer and even if an obvious one suggests itself,
the required inputs are usually unavailable. There are no right answers but only good or bad
ways of thinking about problems. Thus, tackling cases will involve understanding some
conceptual material, working through some number crunching and doing intelligent
guesswork. Different elements are less or more important in different cases.
The second learning objective is effective oral communication. Sometimes we will ask entire
groups to take stands on such questions as the valuation of a firm or its right financial strategy.
At other times, individual students will be asked to do the same. Students can expect a healthy
mix of all these approaches. Questions and discussion are encouraged throughout the class.
Class preparation and participation are an absolute must. Cases should be briefly discussed in
groups before a class, and every student must come prepared to open a discussion. Just as
important is the ability to listen and assimilate the discussion. You will discover that much of
the learning of the case occurs by listening to your peers in class.
The third learning goal is the development of interpersonal awareness and the ability to work in
groups. You are required to work on the cases as a group. This is because no single individual
has the perspective or the breadth of knowledge and experience that is necessary to explore all
the issues. You will discover that the case analysis will typically require considering and
accounting for the opinions of every group member. In every case, there will be strong views on
the many sides of an issue. You, as a group, will have to form a coherent consensus from these
diverse opinions.
2
Course conduct
Students will be expected to be prepared for all classes. This includes having read the
readings and being prepared to answer questions/participate in discussions. Students should
be in class on time, not leave the class during the session, and not be engaged in any other
activity unrelated to the course during class time.
The only way to learn is to be prepared for classes by reading the material before each class.
It is useful to ask questions and actively participate in class. Students should also make use of
instructor office hours.
Grading
This course has the following deliverables related to the learning objectives.
30% - Case write-ups
Each group must turn in write-ups for up to four assigned cases. We will count the best three for
grading. Each write up must be submitted as a single .pdf file that includes up to two pages of
written analysis plus any exhibits you deem necessary. Each exhibit submitted must be referenced
in the text and should be neatly formatted, converted into .pdf, and attached to the main file so
that the deliverable remains a single .pdf file. No Microsoft Word or EXCEL submissions please.
In your write-ups, do not re-invent the wheel. No detailed background is needed in the writeup.
A few lines summarizing the background and decision on hand suffice. Exercise judgment on
what is necessary to make the write-up coherent. Take a clear stand on the central case problem
and provide a recommended course of action
Turn in the write-ups at or before 11:59 PM Sunday after the case is discussed in class in that
corresponding week. The post- class submission requirement is intended for you to take what
was discussed in class and fill in any blanks.
The case write-ups will assess the critical and integrative thinking objective of the course. The
coding scheme for case submissions is 3N-a.
15% - Participation
This will be judged by attendance, whether you speak up, and whether what is spoken
contributes meaningfully to the discussion. Marks will be subject to the discretion and
judgment of the instructor.
3
10% -- Peer evaluations
Towards the end of the semester, each student will evaluate every other group member
individually. Use participation and attendance in group meetings, contribution to group
preparation, write-ups, and the overall rating as a team player as criteria to grant these grades.
Peer evaluations assess how the student can work in teams.
Like the case write-ups, the final exam will also assess for critical and integrative thinking. The
coding scheme for the final exam is 4N.
For all submissions, whether cases or final exam, late submission is not allowed under
any circumstances, barring personal emergencies etc.
Honour code
The coding scheme may be accessed at all times at:
https://isbhydmoh.sharepoint.com/sites/atrium/Programmes/PGP/ASA-PGP-
202324/StudentManual2023-24/Pages/ISB%20Honour%20Code-2023-
24/Coding_Scheme_202324.aspx
Attendance policy
We will strictly follow the ISB guidelines for attendance. The current policy is reproduced below
for your convenience, but the students are expected to be aware of and keep track of the
institution’s policies as amended from time to time.
Learning is an interactive process. ISB students are admitted partly based on the experiences
they bring to the learning community and what they can add to class discussions. Therefore,
4
attendance is an important aspect of studying here. Absence is only appropriate in cases of
extreme personal illness or injury leading to hospitalization, bereavement within the immediate
family. Even in situations such as hospitalization or bereavement within the family, the excuse
provided, if any, will only be limited to class attendance and not for any other components of
the course. Please note that voluntary activities such as job interviews, business school
competitions, travel plans, joyous family occasions, etc., are not valid reasons for missing a
class.
You are required to attend the entire 2-hour class as per the schedule. Late arrival and early
departure are disruptive to the learning environment; you should be present in class before the
scheduled start time and stay till the conclusion of class.
Requests for excuse of attendance, if any, should be forwarded to the Office of Academic and
Student Affairs (ASA) – [email protected] (for Hyderabad) and
[email protected] (for Mohali) for approval. The ASA team will verify the
same and in turn keep the Faculty and Academic Associate/s informed of the same.
The ISB expects students to attend all class sessions in every course section. Attendance will be
marked and recorded on LMS. However, if due to completely unavoidable reasons a student is
forced to miss a session, the school policy is below:
• If a student misses 20% of sessions in a course; there will be no grade penalty.
• If a student misses 30% of sessions in a course, s/he will obtain a letter grade lower than
that awarded by the faculty for that course.
• If a student misses 40% of sessions in a course, the student will receive a letter grade that
is two levels lower.
• If a student misses more than 40% of sessions in a course, the student will receive an 'F'
grade for that course.
Other Notes
• For half credit courses, 30% may not be applicable given it will equate to one and a half
sessions. In addition, please note that part attendance in the class (e.g., attending only one
of the two hours) will be treated as an absence. Extenuating circumstances may
sometimes be considered per ISB policies
Pre-requisites
• An open mind willing to learn new concepts.
• The CFIN core.
The course packet is the only required material for the course. There may be additional readings
for each session that will be available on the course webpage (on LMS). It is useful to supplement
5
the course readings with related material from standard texts such as Jonathan Berk and Peter
DeMarzo, Corporate Finance, 5th Edition (Global Edition), Pearson, 2020.
6
Class 4: Going private •
Who goes private?
• Buyouts -- The role of Strategic v. financial buyers
• Sources of value in buyouts
• Buyout valuation modelling
Case: Dollar General Going Private, HBS Case# 9-108-015
Additional Readings
• Jensen, M., Eclipse of the public corporation, Harvard Business Review, 1997
• Kaplan, S. and Per Strömberg, Leveraged buyouts and private equity, Journal of
Economic Perspectives, Volume 23, Number 1, Spring 2009
• Gompers, P. and Ivashina, V. and Van Gool, J., Note on LBO capital structure, HBS
module note #9-214-039.
7
Case: Immulogic Pharmaceutical Corporation Abridged (HBS #9-293-087) Additional
Readings: Continuation of readings listed in Class 5
8
CASE QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PREPARATION
US Bank of Washington
1. Evaluate Redhook’s historical business and financial performance
2. What are the business risks in Redhook’s proposed venture? What information might a
banker seek to mitigate these risks?
3. Evaluate Redhook’s financial projections. What key risks do they identify?
4. What in your assessment are Redhook’s real needs and why might US Bank of Washington
be in a unique position to meet them?
5. Why do you think small firms depend on banks for lending? Do you think banks are useful
in the 21st century. Or, as many techies say, are banks irrelevant but not banking?
9
3. Using the data on default and recovery rates, do a DCF valuation of the deal. The portfolio
beta is 0.20 and the investment horizon is 5 years.
4. This one is a little harder. Can you back out the implied probability of default from the data
on credit default swaps? The rate of return on the deal?
10