Lecture 21 - Design of Overlays White-Topping
Lecture 21 - Design of Overlays White-Topping
Design of White-topping
IRC:SP-76-2015
White-topping
• White-topping: It is defined as a Portland cement concrete (PCC) overlay constructed on the top of an existing
bituminous pavement. White-topping is thus PCC resurfacing (overlay) as a rehabilitation or structural strengthening
alternative on bituminous pavement
• White-topping is quite common is USA, Europe on Airports, Inter-state roads, Primary and secondary roads, local
roads and streets, parking lot
• Application of white-topping in India: Mumbai, Pune, Delhi and Nagpur, and other cities
• Classification of white-topping
1. Conventional white-topping: Thickness > 200 mm (Same as rigid pavement) (CWT)
2. Thin white-topping: Thickness: 100-200 mm (TWT)
3. Ultra-thin white-topping: Thickness < 100 mm (UTWT) White-topping
Existing HMA
Major factors: load stress, temperature stress, # of load repetitions, thickness, quality of existing pavement
Concepts UTWT/TWT
1. Bonded/Unbonded: Shift of Neural Axis- Which results much of
PCC area comes under compression, less tensile stress, and therefore a
lesser thickness is required compared to conventional PCC
Compaction with
Screed Vibrators
(only for lower thickness
Some Finishing Touches
Surface Texturing being done
Tine Texture (preferred)
Brush Texture
CONCRETE PANLES
& SEALED JOINTS
-1 m X 1 m SIZE
Typical distresses observed in MnROAD BCOA cells
(Barman et al., 2010; Vandenbossche, 2003; Burnham, 2006).
IRC:SP:76-2015
- BBD on top of bituminous layer and graphical method
IRC:SP:76-2015
IRC:SP:76-2015 Load Stress
Temperature Stress
Negative temperature:
0.15 C/cm
4.2577 3.268
2. N = 0.45≤SR≤0.55
𝑆𝑅−0.4325
𝐴𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝐹𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑥𝑙𝑒 𝑡𝑦𝑝𝑒𝑠
0.9718−𝑆𝑅 Stress Ratio (SR) = ,
3. 𝐿𝑜𝑔10 N = 0.0828 SR>0.55 𝐹𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒
generally used for cumulative fatigue damage analysis
Cumulative Fatigue Damage – Miner’s Hypothesis
𝑛
σ 𝑖 should be < 1.
𝑁
𝑛𝑖 = Actual (expected) repetition
N = Allowable repetition
Design a white-topping for a city 2 lane roads, having two way CVPD of 2384 in year of completion of construction. The
existing pavement is bituminous layer with Subgrade CBR of 10%, Aggregate layer: 450 mm, bituminous layer of 150 mm.
The BBD was conducted on the existing pavement, and characteristics deflection was found to be 0.45 mm. M40 grade
concrete, modulus =30000 MPa, modulus of rupture: 4.5 MPa, Poisson ratio: 0.15. Design life= 20 years, growth rate:
7.5%. Assume contraction joint spacing of 1 m. Coefficient of thermal expansion: 10-5/C. Follow IRC:SP:76-2015 for
design
Note: F=1 (it is assumed one axle will impact for all configuration, due
to short panel size in range of 1 to 1.3 m).
Step 2: Find k value on top of existing bituminous pavement, based on deflection measured using BBD. (Deflection:
0.45 mm).
k value = (1 kg/cm3 = 10 MPa/m)
Step 3: Assume trial thickness of white-topping, say 150 mm
4 Eh3
Radius of relative stiffness: l=
12 1 − μ2 𝑘
Step 4: Estimate curling tensile stress at corner. Negative temperature differential = 0.15
C/cm thickness. Length of slab: 1 m (100 cm), thickness (h= 150 mm, or 15 cm).
Step 5: Find load stress due to 8 ton single axle and 16 ton tandem axle.
Note: Load stress for other axle load will be calculated proportionately.
Step 6: Fatigue Damage due to single and tandem axle.
Single Axle
Allowable
Load Expected Axle Fatigue
Group % Repetitions Load Stress Stress Repetitions Damage
(kN) Frequency (n) (kg/cm2) Ratio (SR) (N) (n/N)
160 0
140 0
120 2.61
100 22.23
80 7.84
<80 67.32
Total
Fatigue
Damage
Tandem Axle
Allowable
Load Expected Axle Fatigue
Group % Repetitions Load Stress Stress Repetitions Damage
(kN) Frequency (n) (kg/cm2) Ratio (SR) (N) (n/N)
280 0
240 1.18
200 1.18
160 4.71
<140 92.93
Total
Fatigue
Damage
Step 7: Total flexural stress due to load and temperature
Maximum load stress:
Temperature stress:
Total stress
Check if this is less than flexural strength of concrete, and comment on design (based
on total stress and CFD).
Notes for white-topping construction.
1. Generally dowel bar of 25 mm diameter MS bars (500 mm long) at 300 mm c/c at mid depth of slab is provided only at the
construction joint.
2. 12 mm diameter deformed bars (640 mm long) at 400 mm c/c placed at mid depth of slab only at the centre of the slab at the
central longitudinal joint only (You can design the tie bar too).
3. Polypropylene fibres to be added to the concrete to reduce shrinkage cracking
4. Profile correction by DBM up to 50 mm, should be added, to ensure a uniform support, and minimum thickness of BT layer of 75-100
mm.
5. Joints are to be cut as per usual practice of concrete pavement. Joint width can be in range of 3-4 mm, sealed with appropriate
sealant.
Limitation/Future Work of Design of TWT/UTWT
1. The load stress calculation is based on Westergaard method, which may not be applicable for thin slab.
2. Design method based on semi-mechanistic principle
3. Consideration of change in modulus of HMA with temperature is important
4. Evaluation of strength of bond/quantification of bond between PCC and HMA
5. FEM analysis needed
The Course CE742 Ends