Impact of Social Media Influencer
Impact of Social Media Influencer
Allam Hamdan
Udo Braendle Editors
Harnessing
AI, Machine
Learning, and IoT
for Intelligent
Business
Volume 1
Studies in Systems, Decision and Control
Volume 555
Series Editor
Janusz Kacprzyk , Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences,
Warsaw, Poland
Editorial Board
Dmitry A. Novikov, Institute of Control Sciences (Director), Russian Academy of
Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Peng Shi, School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of
Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Jinde Cao, School of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanijing, China
Marios Polycarpou, KIOS Research Center, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
Witold Pedrycz, Faculty of Engineering, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
Allam Hamdan · Udo Braendle
Editors
© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature
Switzerland AG 2025
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether
the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse
of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and
transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar
or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication
does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant
protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book
are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or
the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any
errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Abstract This study explores into the intricate relationship between social media
influencers and consumer purchasing behavior within the growing landscape of social
commerce platforms in India. Amidst the rise of social commerce, the research
aims to elucidate the specific impact of influencer attributes, including niche exper-
tise, authenticity, credibility, trust, and perceived value, on consumers’ impulsive
buying behavior. The study employs a robust research design, utilizing a sample of
respondents from Bangalore City through snowball sampling. Data is collected via
a questionnaire featuring Likert scale statements, and subsequent analyses reveal
noteworthy insights. A sample of 454 participants was collected through a ques-
tionnaire and filtered to obtain a refined dataset of 429 responses. The majority
spend between Rs. 10,001 and Rs. 25,000 on social commerce platforms monthly.
Factor loadings and correlation coefficients suggest robust relationships between
indicators and constructs. The study supports all five hypotheses, indicating niche
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025 451
A. Hamdan and U. Braendle (eds.), Harnessing AI, Machine Learning, and IoT for
Intelligent Business, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 555,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67890-5_41
452 R. Naveen Kumar et al.
1 Introduction
2 Review of Literature
[25] impact of social media influencers on brand awareness, brand image, and trust in
their sponsored content was focused, and the influencers were in two groups intrinsic
and extrinsic, and it was indicated that the social media influencers perceived intrinsic
characteristics positively impact the level of brand awareness, and perceived extrinsic
traits positively affect brand image, and trust in sponsored content. [32] Social support
theories and word of mouth to predict how social commerce building blocks, such
as forums, communities, ratings, and reviews, help businesses introduce innovative
strategies in digital markets, focusing on trust. [33] the influence of social media influ-
encers on consumer engagement, analyzing factors such as antecedents, decision, and
outcome. It proposes an integrated framework for testing marketing efforts and devel-
oping effective influencer strategies. Neelankandan and Venkatesan [28] the impact
of Instagram on consumer buying behavior and the credibility of Instagram celebri-
ties, focusing on the influence of brands and influencers in various industries. [43]
online consumer reviews, social media advertisements, and influencer endorsements
on online purchase intention of fashion apparel during the pandemic. Results from
a sample of 163 customers show a positive correlation between these variables. The
study highlights the importance of social media marketing for companies to survive in
the twenty-first century of online consumption and consumer-oriented social media.
Ramadan and Farah [35] explores the influencer’s impact on social shopping, high-
lighting the shift towards co-creation and co-selling in companies, involving 15
experts and suggesting strategies for brands and retailers. Mishra and Ashfaq [26]
examines the influencer marketing’s impact on consumer behavior and purchasing
decisions, focusing on message value, influencer characteristics, and content accu-
racy (Othman et al. 2019). Social commerce offers businesses new opportunities,
with factors influencing consumer intention to purchase including shopping enjoy-
ment, perceived usefulness, trust, security, quality, value, ease of use, and transaction
convenience. Gayathri and Poongodi [16]. The COVID-19 pandemic has height-
ened environmental concerns and increased organic food consumption, necessitating
retailers to understand consumer behavior and adapt strategies. Social media usage
and satisfaction influence trust, purchase intentions, and word-of-mouth intentions
in India. Gautam and Jaitly [15] social media influencers significantly influence
customer perception and attitude, providing new competitive strength for companies
using this platform to spread product information and gain followers.
454 R. Naveen Kumar et al.
Authenticity
Authenticity is the way to show the true and fair picture of themselves to the followers
or fans [23], in the early days, celebrities are found to the hero in the movie, being star
in a sport, and musician, but now the trend of celebrities moved to the social media
influencers who are found to the celebrity in the online media platforms, YouTube
and bloggers [27]. They have a huge fan base, and these followers are following
them, as they find the content shared by them is true and authentic, and they also
create authenticity in the information shared by them [24]. It is also found that the
information shared by the social media influencers are found to be more credible and
authentic, and these social media influencers are in lifestyle, food, entertainment,
finance and more [34], they also maintain their presence in different social media
platforms and share their content in different forum. The fan base tends to follow
the lifestyle and fashion that are shared by the social media influencers, this is how
The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Purchasing … 455
the followers tend to buy impulsively, based on the posts shared by the social media
influencers are authentic and impressive [12] and the hypothesis that
H 1b : Authenticity of posts by the social media influencers is positively influencing
the impulsive buying behavior.
Credibility
Credibility is shows that the information shared by the influencers are informative
and qualitative and the followers are accepting the content [30]. As the information
shared by the influencer to be of expertise, and hence this allows the followers to
accept the ideas that are shared [39]. The expertise refers to the knowledge and
competency of the influencer, and the content shared by the influencers has been the
valid information [10].
H 1c : Credibility of Content shared by the social media influencers is positively
influencing impulsive buying behavior.
Trust
Trust is the belief that the followers have on the posts of social media influencers [4],
as the trust is the factor that creates the belief system in the minds of the consumers
[40], users trust is that the follower’s belief on the social media influencers, it is state of
mind where the followers readily accept the product from the social media marketing
[37]. Trust is the underlying factor that creates and builds a relationship with the
individual. As the individual having fan base, sharing the products and services that
they use impact the followers and it creates an impulsive buying behavior [8].
H 1d : Trust on the social media influencers post is positively influencing the impulse
buying behavior.
Perceived Value
Perception of the consumer is always important as the way in which the individual
is perceive the product, plays a major role in the purchase of a product [45]. The
perception is the usefulness of a product and the benefit received out of the product
[9], as the perceived value is the maximum benefit that an individual could receive
out of using the social media or the social media influencers [31]. The perceived
value on the social media influencers are also essential in satisfying the followers.
H 1e : Perceived value of the social media influencers post has a positive impact
on the impulse buying behavior.
4 Conceptual Model
See Fig. 1.
5 Problem Statement
The statement emphasizes the need for deeper understanding of social media influ-
encers’ impact on consumer purchasing behavior in social commerce platforms. It
highlights strategies like live broadcasting, trust, perceived risk, and online behav-
ioral advertising, as well as the role of psychological disposition and advertising
perceptions. It also acknowledges the platform-specific influence of social media.
6 Research Gap
8 Research Question
Does the social media influencers have any impact on the impulse buying behavior, as
the social media influencers aspects are measured with the Niche Expertise, Authen-
ticity, Credibility, Trust and Perceived Value of the Content shares by the social media
influencers impacting the impulse buying behavior?
9 Methodology
The research was centered on investigating the impact of social media influencers on
impulsive buying behavior among consumers, specifically focusing on individuals
in Bangalore City. The study employed snowball sampling to gather a sample of 454
participants, utilizing a chain-referral method where consumers engaged in impulsive
buying on social commerce platforms introduced others with similar behaviors. Data
was collected through a questionnaire featuring Likert scale statements to measure
various constructs related to impulsive buying. After the collection phase, the dataset
was filtered, and any missing data were excluded, resulting in a final dataset of 429
responses. Subsequent analyses were conducted using this refined dataset. From
September 2023 to January 2024, was the period of study.
10 Data Analysis
Data analysis in this study was conducted with the following sections such as Descrip-
tive statistics, Indicators Loading, Skewness and Kurtosis, Validity and Reliability,
Discriminant Validity—HTMT Ratio and PLS-SEM using AMOS to analyze the
impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Purchasing Behavior in Social
Commerce Platforms. The data from Table 1 indicates that the majority spend
between Rs. 10,001 and Rs. 25,000 on social commerce platforms monthly. These
demographic variables provide insights into impulsive buying behavior on social
commerce platforms. Table 2 shows that the factor loadings suggest a robust rela-
tionship between the indicators and their respective constructs, and the Skewness
and kurtosis values provide information about the distributional characteristics of
458 R. Naveen Kumar et al.
the data, which is essential for understanding the statistical properties of the vari-
ables in the study. Table 3 Overall, the correlation coefficients indicate relationships
between different constructs. The high AVE values suggest that each construct is
well-measured by its indicators, supporting convergent validity. Additionally, the low
VIF values suggest that multicollinearity is not a significant concern in the model.
These findings collectively contribute to the validity and reliability of the measure-
ment model in the study. Table 4 shows that all five hypotheses (H1a to H1e) are
supported by the statistical analysis, indicating that Niche Expertise, Authenticity,
Credibility, Trust, and Perceived Value are significant factors influencing Impulse
Buying Behavior.
The sample includes individuals aged 25–65, with a majority living in urban
areas and working in private sector industries. They earn between 30,000 and 60,000
dollars per month and spend less than 10,000 on social commerce platforms.
The data for analysis is normally distributed, as indicated by Skewness and
Kurtosis values, with no outliers and factor loadings exceeding 0.5, allowing for
the same analysis with the same indicators.
The constructs’ reliability is assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and Composite
Reliability. The data is highly reliable, with Cronbach’s alpha values above 0.50 for
impulse buying behavior, perceived value, trust, credibility, authenticity, and niche
expertise. Convergent validity is also high, with values above 0.50 for all constructs.
Discriminant validity is established, and no multi-collinearity issues are found.
SEM Model
The study used SEM analysis to evaluate the impact of social media influencers on
customers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platforms. The model’s fit
is evaluated using indices such as CMIN/df, TLI, IFI, GFI, RMSEA, and RMR, with
results indicating good fit (Fig. 2).
The study found that niche expertise, authenticity, credibility, trust, and perceived
value significantly influence consumer impulsive buying behavior. These factors
explain 54.7% of the variance in impulsive buying behavior, with a squared correla-
tion value of 0.547. These findings support the hypothesis H1a, H1b, H1c, H1d, and
H1e.
11 Discussion
This study explores the relationship between social media influencers and consumer
purchasing behavior, focusing on India’s social commerce landscape. It emphasizes
the need for a deeper understanding of influencer attributes, consumer engagement
dynamics, trust, and psychological factors influencing modern consumer decisions.
Key influencer characteristics include niche expertise, authenticity, credibility, trust,
and perceived value. The study tests and substantiates these hypotheses, highlighting
the impact of specialized knowledge on impulsive buying behavior. The findings
affirm the relevance of social media influencers in the ever-evolving realm of social
commerce.
The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Purchasing … 461
Fig. 2 Structural equation model calculated value from Tables 1, 2, and 3 (2024)
12 Conclusion
13 Theoretical Implications
14 Practical Implications
This study focused on the impact of the social media influencers on the impulsive
buying behavior of the consumers in the city of Bangalore while the study could be
extended to other parts of the country, The future research can be focused on the
psychological factors, and the other factors determining the buying decision of the
behavior and the impulsive buying from social commerce platforms can be focused.
References
1. Alam, F., Tao, M., Lahuerta-Otero, E., Feifei, Z.: Let’s buy with social commerce platforms
through social media influencers: an Indian consumer perspective. Front. Psychol. 13 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853168
2. Ali, A.A., Abbass, A., Farid, N.: Factors influencing customers’ purchase intention in social
commerce. Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 10(5), Article 5 (2020)
3. Aral, S.: Identifying social influence: a comment on opinion leadership and social contagion
in new product diffusion. Mark. Sci. 30(2), 217–223 (2011)
The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Purchasing … 463
4. Ben Yahia, I.: Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: impor-
tance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 41
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.021
5. Bentler, P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238–246
(1990). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
6. Burnkrant, R.E., Cousineau, A.: Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior.
J. Consum. Res. 2(3), 206–215 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1086/208633
7. Chan, D.F.: A study of social media influencers and impact on consumer buying behavior in
the United Kingdom. Manag. Stud. 03(07) (2022)
8. Chen, J., Shen, X.-L.: Consumers’ decisions in social commerce context: an empirical
investigation. Decis. Support. Syst. 79, 55–64 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.
07.012
9. Chen, S.-C., Lin, C.-P.: Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: the
mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction. Technol. Forecast. Soc.
Change 140, 22–32 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.025
10. Cheung, C.M.K., Lee, M.K.O., Rabjohn, N.: The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: the
adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Res. 18(3), 229–247
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
11. Chung, N., Song, H.G., Lee, H.: Consumers’ impulsive buying behavior of restaurant products
in social commerce. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 29(2), 709–731 (2017). https://doi.org/10.
1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0608
12. Chung, S., Cho, H.: Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: impli-
cations for celebrity endorsement. Psychol. Mark. 34(4), 481–495 (2017). https://doi.org/10.
1002/mar.21001
13. Freberg, K., Graham, K., McGaughey, K., Freberg, L.A.: Who are the social media influencers?
A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relat. Rev. 37(1), 90–92 (2011). https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.11.001
14. Gaurav, K., Ray, A.: Impact of social media advertising on consumer buying behavior in Indian
E-commerce industry. Sumedha J. Manag. 9, 41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.46454/SUMEDHA/
9.1.2020.3
15. Gautam, O., Jaitly, R.: Impact of social media influencers on customer engagement and brand
perception. Int. J. Internet Mark. Advert. 15, 220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMA.2021.
10036969
16. Gayathri, U., Poongodi, P.: Impact of social media on consumer buying behavior of organic
food products in Tamil Nadu. IARJSET 8, 104–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.
2021.8619
17. Goel, M.R., Diwan, M.M.: Influence of social media marketing on buying decision making
process of consumers. Math. Stat. Eng. Appl. 71(4), Article 4 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17762/
msea.v71i4.1138
18. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson
(2009)
19. Handarkho, Y.D.: Impact of social experience on customer purchase decision in the social
commerce context. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 22(1), 47–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-05-
2019-0088
20. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparame-
terized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3, 424–453 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/
1082-989X.3.4.424
21. Hu, X., Chen, X., Davison, R.M.: Social support, source credibility, social influence, and
impulsive purchase behavior in social commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 23(3), 297–327
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2019.1619905
22. Kala Kamdjoug, J.R.: The influence of social network communication on the buying behavior
of Cameroonian consumers on social e-commerce platforms. J. Enterpr. Inf. Manag. 36(5),
1319–1348 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2022-0329
464 R. Naveen Kumar et al.
23. Kowalczyk, C.M., Pounders, K.R.: Transforming celebrities through social media: the role of
authenticity and emotional attachment. J. Prod. Brand. Manag. 25(4), 345–356 (2016). https://
doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2015-0969
24. Lina, Y., Hou, D., Ali, S.: Impact of online convenience on generation Z online impulsive
buying behavior: the moderating role of social media celebrity. Front. Psychol. 13 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951249
25. Matin, A., Khoshtaria, T., Todua, N.: The impact of social media influencers on brand aware-
ness, image and trust in their sponsored content: an empirical study from Georgian social media
users. Int. J. Mark. Commun. New Media 10, 88–114 (2022). https://doi.org/10.54663/2182-
9306.2022.v10.n18.88-114
26. Mishra, M.S., Ashfaq, D.R.: Influencer impact: examining the effect of influencers on consumer
behavior and purchase decisions. J. Prod. Oper. Manag. Econ. (JPOME) 3(05), Article 05
(2023). ISSN: 2799-1008. https://doi.org/10.55529/jpome.35.1.18
27. Moulard, J.G., Rice, D.H., Garrity, C.P., Mangus, S.M.: Artist authenticity: how artists’ passion
and commitment shape consumers’ perceptions and behavioral intentions across genders.
Psychol. Mark. 31(8), 576–590 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20719
28. Neelankandan, S., Venkatesan, S.: Social Commerce Constructs and Trust as Influencers of
Consumer Decision Making with Reference to Fashion E-Tailing, pp. 371–383 (2020)
29. Nurfadila, S.: Impact of influencers in consumer decision process: the fashion industry.
Interdiscip. J. Law Soc. Sci. Hum. 1(2), 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.19184/ijl.v1i1.19146
30. Ohanian, R.: Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived
expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J. Advert. 19(3), 39–52 (1990). https://doi.org/
10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
31. Oke, A., Kamolshotiros, P., Popoola, O., Ajagbe, M., Olujobi, O.: Consumer behavior towards
decision making and loyalty to particular brands. Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 6, 43–52 (2016)
32. Patwa, N., Gupta, M., Mittal, A.: Modeling the influence of online communities and social
commerce. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication (2024) (ahead-of-print). https://
doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2023-0014
33. Pradhan, B., Kishore, K., Gokhale, N.: Social media influencers and consumer engagement: a
review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 47(6), 2106–2130 (2023). https://doi.
org/10.1111/ijcs.12901
34. Rahman, Z., Moghavvemmi, S., Suberamanaian, K., Zanuddin, H., Bin Md Nasir, H.N.: Medi-
ating impact of fan-page engagement on social media connectedness and followers purchase
intention. Online Inf. Rev. 42(7), 1082–1105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2017-
0150
35. Ramadan, Z.B., Farah, M.F.: Influencing the influencers (2020). https://doi.org/10.1504/
IJWBC.2020.108626
36. Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G.: A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd
ed., pp. xii, 498. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers (2004)
37. Shanmugam, M., Sun, S., Amidi, A., Khani, F., Khani, F.: The applications of social commerce
constructs. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36, 425–432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.
01.007
38. Shen, Y.-C., Huang, C.-Y., Chu, C.-H., Liao, H.-C.: Virtual community loyalty: an
interpersonal-interaction perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 15(1), 49–74 (2010). https://
doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415150102
39. Sussman, S.W., Siegal, W.S.: Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach
to knowledge adoption. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(1), 47–65 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.
47.14767
40. Wang, J., Shahzad, F., Ahmad, Z., Abdullah, M., Hassan, N.M.: Trust and consumers’ purchase
intention in a social commerce platform: a meta-analytic approach. SAGE Open 12(2),
21582440221091264 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221091262
41. Wang, P., Huang, Q.: Digital influencers, social power and consumer engagement in social
commerce. Internet Res. 33(1), 178–207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2020-0467
The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Consumer Purchasing … 465
42. Xiang, L., Zheng, X., Lee, M., Zhao, D.: Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on
social commerce platform: the role of parasocial interaction. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36, 333–347
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.002
43. Yaacob, A., Gan, J., Yusuf, S.: The role of online consumer review, social media advertisement
and influencer endorsement on purchase intention of fashion apparel during COVID-19. J.
Content Commun. Commun. 14, 17–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.21/03
44. Yadav, M., Rahman, Z.: The influence of social media marketing activities on customer loyalty:
a study of e-commerce industry. Benchmarking: Int. J. 25(9), 3882–3905 (2018). https://doi.
org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2017-0092
45. Zauner, A., Koller, M., Hatak, I.: Customer perceived value—conceptualization and avenues for
future research. Cogent Psychol. 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2015.1061782
46. Zheng, X., Men, J., Yang, F., Gong, X.: Understanding impulse buying in mobile commerce: an
investigation into hedonic and utilitarian browsing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 48(C), 151–160 (2019)