Physics 5
Physics 5
Most experiments in physics consist of sending one particle to collide with another, and looking
at what comes out.
The quantity we can usually measure is the scattering cross section: by analogy with classical
scattering of hard spheres, we assuming that scattering occurs if the particles ‘hit’ each other. The
cross section is the apparent ‘target area’. The total scattering cross section can be determined by
the reduction in intensity of a beam of particles passing through a region on ‘targets’, while the
differential scattering cross section requires detecting the scattered particles at different angles.
We will use spherical polar coordinates, with the scattering potential located at the origin and the
plane wave incident flux parallel to the z direction. In this coordinate system, scattering processes
dσ
are symmetric about φ, so dΩ will be independent of φ.
We will also use a purely classical concept, the impact parameter b which is defined as the distance
of the incident particle from the z-axis prior to scattering.
S(k)
δΩ
I(k)
θ z
φ
Plane-wave states have wavefunctions of the form: uk,ω (r) = C exp(i(k.r − ωt)) with C a normal-
isation constant. Because plane-wave states are not properly normalisable we employ the trick
of normalising them in a large (relative to potential range) cubic box of side L with periodic
boundary conditions. We then take the limit L → ∞ at the end of the calculation.
Thus we require that
Z Z Z Z Z Z
u∗k,ω (r)uk,ω (r) dτ = |C|2 dτ = |C|2 L3 = 1
box box
giving for the normalised eigenfunctions: uk,ω (r) = L−3/2 exp(ik.r − ωt)
Of course, enclosing the system in a finite box has the consequence that the allowed momentum
eigenvalues are no longer continuous but discrete. With periodic boundary conditions
L L
u(− , y, z) = u( , y, z), etc.
2 2
the momentum eigenvalues are forced to be of the form
2πh̄
p ≡ h̄k = (nx , ny , nz ), with nx , ny , nz = 0, ±1, ±2, . . .
L
For sufficiently large L, we can approximate the continuous spectrum arbitrarily closely.
Any possible final-state wave-vector, k, corresponds to a point in wave-vector space with coordi-
nates (kx , ky , kz ). The points form a cubic lattice with lattice spacing 2π/L. Thus the volume of
k–space per lattice point is (2π/L)3 , and the number of states in a volume element d3 k is
µ ¶3 µ ¶3
L L
d3 k0 = k 2 dk dΩ
2π 2π
We require g(Ek ), the density of states per unit energy, where: Ek = h̄2 k 2 /2m is the energy
corresponding to wave-vector k0 . Now, the wave-vectors in the range k0 → k0 + d3 k0 correspond
to the energy range Ek → Ek + dEk , so that
µ ¶3
L
g(Ek ) dEk = k 2 dk dΩ
2π
is the number of states with energy in the desired interval and with wave-vector, k0 , pointing into
the solid angle dΩ about the direction (θ, φ). Noting that dEk = (h̄2 k/m) dk yields the final result
for the density of states,
L3 mk
g(Ek ) = dΩ
8π 3 h̄2
12.4 Incident and Scattered Flux
The box normalisation corresponds to one particle per volume L3 , so that the number of particles
crossing unit area perpendicular to the beam per unit time is just given by the magnitude of the
incident velocity divided by L3 :
|p|/m h̄k
incident flux = 3
=
L mL3
Using the Golden Rule, we have that the rate of transitions between the initial state of wave-vector
k and final states whose wave-vectors k0 lie in the element of solid angle dΩ about the direction
(θ, φ) of the wave-vector k0 , is given by
2π L3 mk
R= |Vk0 k |2 3 2 dΩ
h̄ 8π h̄
but this is just the number of particles scattered into dΩ per unit time. To get the scattered flux
we simply divide by dΩ to get the number per unit time per unit solid angle.
Z ∞ −iχr
e − eiχr 4π Z ∞
= 2π V (r)r2 dr = rV (r) sin(χr)dr
0 −iχr χ 0
But since |k| = |k0 |, |χ| = 2k sin 2θ , Whence we obtain the most useful form of the Born approxi-
mation:
¯Z ¯2
dσ m2 ¯ ∞ θ ¯¯
¯
= ¯ rV (r) sin(2kr sin )dr¯
dΩ (k sin 2θ )2 h̄4 ¯ 0 2 ¯
Thus the scattering cross-section is independent of φ (due to cylindrical symmetry of the problem).
Note that this shows that the differential cross section does not depend on scattering angle and
beam energy independently, but on a single parameter χ. By using a range of energies for the
incoming particles, k, this dependence can be used to test whether experimental data can be well
described by the Born Approximation.
dσ
The most common use of the Born approximation is, of course, in reverse. Having found dΩ
experimentally, a reverse Fourier transform can be used to obtain the form of the potential.
whence:
" #2 " #2
dσ 2µV0 sin(χa) − χa cos(χa)
=
dΩ χh̄2 χ2
From integrating over θ and φ the low and high energy limits for the total cross section are
· ¸2 " #2 · ¸2 " #2
µ V0 a3 µ V0 a3 8 2 2 2 4 4
σ(E → ∞) = 2π 2 σ(E → 0) = 2π 2 (k a − k a + ...)
h̄ ka h̄ ka 9 5
The square well illustrates some general feature of scattering in the Born approximation:
• Born approximation is based on perturbation theory, so works best for high energy particles.
• Scattering depends on V02 , so both attractive and repulsive potentials behave the same.
• At high energy, cross section is inversely proportional to the energy (E = h̄2 k 2 /2m)
• Dependence on k and θ arises only through the combination χ = 2k sin 2θ . Thus as energy
increases, the scattering angle θ is reduced and the scattered beam becomes more peaked in
the ‘straight on’ direction.
• Angular dependence depends on the range of the potential a but not on the strength V0 .
• Total cross section depends on both range a and depth V0 of the potential.