NRES-TRANSES
NRES-TRANSES
2
Shane Kyle
NUR1212 – NURSING RESEARCH 1
3
Shane Kyle
NUR1212 – NURSING RESEARCH 1
During this phase, researchers call on such skills as Step 7: Developing Protocols for the Intervention
creativity, deductive reasoning, and a grounding in In experimental research, researchers create the
research evidence on the topic of interest. independent variable, which means that participants are
Step 1: Formulating and Delimiting the Problem exposed to different treatments. An intervention protocol
- Quantitative researchers begin by identifying an for the study must be developed, specifying exactly what
interesting research problem and formulating research the intervention will entail (e.g., who will administer it,
questions. over how long a period the treatment will last, and so on)
- The research questions identify what the study and what the alternative condition will be. In
variables are. In developing questions, nurse nonexperimental research, this step is not necessary.
researchers must attend to Step 8: Identifying the Population
- substantive issues (Is this problem important?) Quantitative researchers need to specify what
- theoretical issues (Is there a conceptual framework characteristics study participants should possess—that is,
for this problem?) they must identify the population to be studied. A
- clinical issues (Will findings be useful in clinical population is all the individuals or objects with common,
practice?) defining characteristics (the “P” component in PICO
- methodologic issues (How can this question be questions).
answered to yield high-quality evidence?) Step 9: Designing the Sampling Plan
- ethical issues (Can this question be addressed in an Researchers typically collect data from a sample, which is
ethical manner? a subset of the population. The researcher’s sampling plan
Step 2: Reviewing the Related Literature specifies how the sample will be selected and how many
- Quantitative research is conducted within the context subjects there will be. The goal is to have a sample that
of previous knowledge. adequately reflects the population’s traits.
- Quantitative researchers typically strive to understand Step 10: Specifying Methods to Measure Variables
what is already known about a topic by undertaking a Quantitative researchers must find methods to measure the
thorough literature review before any data are research variables accurately. A variety of quantitative
collected. data collection approaches exist; the primary methods are
Step 3: Undertaking Clinical Fieldwork self-reports (e.g., interviews and questionnaires),
Researchers embarking on a clinical study often benefit observations (e.g., watching and recording people’s
from spending time in relevant clinical settings (in the behavior), and biophysiologic measurements. The task of
field), discussing the topic with clinicians and observing measuring research variables and developing a data
current practices. Such clinical fieldwork can provide collection plan is complex and challenging.
perspectives on clinicians’ and clients’ viewpoints. Step 11: Developing Methods to Safeguard
Step 4: Defining the Framework and Developing Human/Animal Rights
Conceptual Definitions Most nursing research involves human subjects, although
When quantitative research is performed within the some involve animals. In either case, procedures need to
context of a theoretical framework, the findings may have be developed to ensure that the study adheres to ethical
broader significance and utility. Even when the research principles.
question is not embedded in a theory, researchers should Step 12: Reviewing and Finalizing the Research Plan
have a conceptual rationale and a clear vision of the Before collecting data, researchers often undertake
concepts under study. assessments to ensure that procedures will work smoothly.
Step 5: Formulating Hypotheses For example, they may evaluate the readability of written
Step 5: Formulating Hypotheses materials to see if participants with low reading skills can
Hypotheses state researchers’ expectations about comprehend them. Researchers usually have their research
relationships between study variables. Hypotheses are plan critiqued by reviewers to obtain clinical or
predictions of the relationships researchers expect to methodologic feedback. Researchers seeking financial
observe in the study data. The research question identifies support submit a proposal to a funding source, and
the concepts of interest and asks how the concepts might reviewers usually suggest improvements.
be related; a hypothesis is the predicted answer. Most Phase 3: The Empirical Phase
quantitative studies are designed to test hypotheses The third phase of quantitative studies involves collecting
through statistical analysis. the research data. This phase is often the most time-
Phase 2: The Design and Planning Phase consuming part of the study. Data collection may require
Phase 2: The Design and Planning Phase months of work.
In the second major phase of a quantitative study, Step 13: Collecting the Data
researchers decide on the methods they will use to address The actual collection of data in a quantitative study often
the research question. Researchers make many proceeds according to a preestablished plan. The plan
methodologic decisions that have crucial implications for typically spells out procedures for training data collection
the quality of the study evidence. staff, for actually collecting data (e.g., where and when the
Step 6: Selecting a Research Design data will be gathered), and for recording information.
The research design is the overall plan for obtaining Step 14: Preparing the Data for Analysis
answers to the research questions. Quantitative designs Data collected in a quantitative study must be prepared for
tend to be structured and controlled, with the goal of analysis. For example, one preliminary step is coding,
minimizing bias. Research designs also indicate how often which involves translating verbal data into numeric form
data will be collected and what types of comparisons will (e.g., coding gender information as “1” for females, “2” for
be made. The research design is the architectural backbone males, and “3” for other).
of the study. Phase 4: The Analytic Phase
Quantitative data must be subjected to analysis and
interpretation, which occur in the fourth major phase of a
project.
4
Shane Kyle
NUR1212 – NURSING RESEARCH 1
Step 15: Analyzing the Datas - An effect represents the difference between what
To answer research questions and test hypotheses, actually did happen with the exposure and what would
researchers analyze their data in a systematic fashion. have happened without it.
Quantitative data are analyzed through statistical - A counterfactual clearly can never be realized, but it is
analyses, which include some simple procedures (e.g., a good model to keep in mind in thinking about
computing an average) as well as more complex, research design.
sophisticated methods. Experimental Design: Randomized Controlled Trials
Step 16: Interpreting the Results Intervention
Interpretation involves making sense of study results and - The researcher does something to some subjects-
examining their implications. Researchers attempt to introduces an intervention (or treatment).
explain the findings in light of prior evidence, theory, and - Pre and post tests
clinical experience and in light of the adequacy of the Control
methods they used in the study. Interpretation also - The researcher introduces controls, including the use
involves coming to conclusions about the clinical of a control and experimental groups.
significance of the new evidence. - The term control group refers to a group of
Phase 5: The Dissemination Phase participants whose performance on an outcome is used
In the analytic phase, researchers come full circle: The to evaluate the performance of the experimental
questions posed at the outset are answered. The group (the group getting the intervention) on the same
researchers’ job is not completed, however, until study outcome.
results are disseminated. Randomization
Step 17: Communicating the Findings - The experimenter assigns participants to a control or
A study cannot contribute evidence to nursing practice if experimental condition on a random basis
the results are not communicated. Another—and often - Random assignment
final—task of a research project is the preparation of a - The purpose is to make the group equal with regard to
research report that can be shared with others. We discuss all other factors except receipt of the intervention.
research reports in the next chapter. - Meet certain criteria
Step 18: Putting the Evidence Into Practice Crossover design
Ideally, the concluding step of a high-quality study is to - involves exposing people to more than one treatment.
plan for its use in practice settings. Although nurse - has the advantage of ensuring the highest possible
researchers may not implement a plan for using research equivalence among the people exposed to different
findings, they can contribute to the process by developing conditions.
recommendations on how the evidence could be used in
practice, by ensuring that adequate information has been A placebo or pseudointervention presumed to have no
provided for a meta-analysis, and by pursuing therapeutic value
opportunities to disseminate the findings to practicing
nurses. Advantages and Disadvantages of Experiments
ACTIVITIES IN A QUALITATIVE STUDY - RCTs are the “gold standard” for intervention studies
(Therapy questions) because they yield the most
persuasive evidence about the effects of an
intervention.
- First, many interesting variables simply are not
amenable to intervention.
- Second, many variables could technically—but not
ethically—be experimentally varied.
- Sometimes, RCTs are not feasible because of practical
issues.
Quasi-Experiments
- Involve an intervention but lack either randomization
or control group.
- called trials without randomization in the medical
literature
- the time-series design involves collecting data over an
extended time period and introducing the treatment
during that period.
Nonequivalent Control Group Designs
MODULE 3 - Those getting the intervention are compared with a
The research design of a study spells out the strategies nonrandomized comparison group.
that researchers adopt to answer their questions and test Within-subjects Designs
their hypotheses. - One group is studied before and after the intervention.
Causality
- Many research questions are about causes and effects. Advantages and Disadvantages of Quasi-Experiments
- Causality is a hotly debated issue, but we all - May be easier and more practical than true
understand the general concept of a cause. experiments but
- Causes are seldom deterministic; they only increase o They make it more difficult to infer causality
the likelihood that an effect will occur. o Usually there are several alternative rival
hypotheses for results
A counterfactual is what would happen to people if they
were exposed to a causal influence and were
simultaneously not exposed to it.
5
Shane Kyle
NUR1212 – NURSING RESEARCH 1
6
Shane Kyle