Written Assignment Unit 3
Written Assignment Unit 3
Submitted by
DOMINIQUE G. BATADLAN
Master of Education major in Advance Teaching
Submitted to
ISMAIL YUKSEL
Instructor
EDUC 5440-01 Assessment and Evaluation
year 2009, postulates a very strong point about how rubrics might potentially constrain the
creativity, problem-solving capacities, and general cognitive capacity of the students. The
authors believe that standardized rubrics, most often designed to measure the performance of
students in terms of specific criteria, might limit their ability to think critically and be innovative
or flexible while solving problems unconsciously. As Chapman and Inman explain in 2009, "a
rubric can create a narrow path, leaving less room for divergent thinking and individual initiative
Creativity is no longer a good but a necessary tool in solving more complex problems of
governance and economics of a democratic society. The problem about the rubrics is it rigidly
confines and dictates what's norm and what should be expected. This is where the students are
not at the liberty to venture into alternative or other solutions. It would not encourage the critical
thinking of real-world problems as an aim for the solution to a problem. An educator preparing
the child for a globalized world environment requires creating space for creativity and
independence in learners' thought processes. In fact, the authors have moved ahead with the
proposition that work done by students on a template designed by the teacher does not have a
meaningful task of analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information. Chapman & Inman
(2009)
Another researcher has actually stated the concern that the use of rubrics damps
creativity, apart from attacking the standardized assessments to be used in schools. For instance,
Heidari and Ibrahim (2018) mentioned that although rubrics clearly give expectations about the
performance and make grading easier, they probably decrease the room for thinking and, thus,
promote obedience rather than inquiry. In the same vein, L. L. Toh (2021) asserted that rubrics
typically instill a "checklist" mindset wherein students focus more on meeting the minimum
standards rather than coming up with novel solutions to a problem. Flexibility in assessment can
be very apparent in the context. Educational practices continue to change; therefore, I recognize
that students vary as far as needs, skills, and creative ability that one has to take into account
consistency, and fairness in terms of grading. I always thought that the structure should never
exceed creativity and flexibility. Therefore, in my present use of rubrics, I will ensure to
provide space for creativity, and flexibility by creating rubrics that will build room for
exploration and innovation yet within established criteria. For example, instead of prescribing a
tight set of steps for the project, I would give the student broad outlines that would leak out key
goals such as originality, critical thinking, and applicability. I would give the students space to
decide how they would like to approach the work. This would empower the students to exercise
their initiative and take responsibility for their learning, building in responsibility and self-
although the elements like research question, data analysis, and references would be outlined, it
could be an adaptive one where the students would have the freedom of selecting their methods
of research or areas of interest as based on their interests and uniqueness. This would allow the
students to express their creativity in the approach they take in solving the research problem
rather than following a formula. Such flexibility within the rubric liberates students to be graded
not only about the ability to meet the outlined criteria but also for their capacity to think critically
Although rubrics are good for clarifying and standardizing the assessment, their overuse
or application in a rigid form can straighten the creativity and problem-solving ability of
students. Educators must try to bring the ideas and principles of creativity, self-thought, and
flexibility for learning together with rubrics. That would guide us towards helping students in
developing individuals who can think creatively and work in a democratic state.
References
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ849020.pdf
Heidari, H., & Ibrahim, M. H. (2018). The impact of rubrics on creativity and student
128-136. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.128
Toh, L. L. (2021). Creativity and the limitations of rubrics in fostering innovation. Educational