Bài báo
Bài báo
Original Paper
Received: May 5, 2023 Accepted: May 19, 2023 Online Published: September 14, 2023
doi:10.22158/fce.v4n3p12 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/fce.v4n3p12
Abstract
This article is about the relevance of the integrated approach in English for Specific Purposes (ESP)
teaching. The purpose was to show the extent to which that teaching approach is essential in meeting
ESP learners’ needs, as compared to a training based on grammar points and discrete items of the
language. The study was grounded in the genre theory and it was made around main questions as
follows: what is the appropriate approach to ESP teaching-learning? Should teaching ESP be about
discrete items, grammar, or an integrated approach? What does the adoption of the integrated
approach entail? To address these concerns, we conducted a research with the target population (6
learners from two different companies), through a semi-structured interview guide. The findings
revealed that the integrated approach gives to ESP courses more meaning. The implementation of
authentic activities is a means of giving the possibility to the students to build and acquire global
knowledge in the language, which is far better than focusing on grammar points and isolated and
floating terminologies.
Keywords
approach, discrete items, ESP, genre, integrated, needs
1. Introduction
The growing need to prepare individuals capable of operating in a variety of socio-professional
contexts has given English for Specific Purposes [ESP] a prominent place in the language classroom.
With this new reality, researchers and practitioners in the field of ESP are constantly engaged in a
process that seeks to develop the best approaches for more effective learning.
Several approaches have thus emerged from this desire to make ESP easier to learn. Among these
approaches, many practitioners tend to adopt the teaching of discrete items of the language. However,
this approach has been extensively criticized for not giving enough space to communication. The
integrated approach will thus come to the forefront because of the emphasis it places on both the needs
of the learners and the communicative aspect of the language (Koné, 2022).
12
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fce Frontiers of Contemporary Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 2023
The researchers who defend this paradigm believe that the adoption of the integrated approach to ESP
teaching offers better prospects for improving the training conditions of learners so as to meet the
objectives that led to the emergence of ESP. Based on the ongoing debate on the best practices to be
adopted in the ESP classroom, we are interested in the best approaches for the teaching of ESP.
Therefore, what is the appropriate approach to ESP teaching-learning? Should teaching ESP be about
discrete items, grammar, or an integrated approach? What does the adoption of the integrated approach
entail? The answer to these questions will lead the following work.
teaching material.
From the above, it stands out that ESP is primarily both learner-centered and learning-centered
(Hutchinson & Waters, op. cit.) as it places great emphasis on the learner. Teaching ESP usually
appears as a difficult task for many teachers. Such difficulties mainly rest in the approach used. Indeed,
while some teachers believe it should be the teaching of discrete items and grammar points to meet
learners’ needs, some others apprehend the approach to the teaching of ESP should be integrated.
2.2 The Genre Theory
In communication, a genre is a system of choices available to the user of the language which allows
him to achieve or express meaning in a given environment. Swales (1990) is one of the first to apply
genre theory to ESP. He asserts that like genre, ESP also stipulates that linguistics characteristics must
be connected to the context of use. ESP aims at offering learners the means of communication that will
increase their knowledge in a given academic and/or professional community. Swales (idem, p. 85)
asserts that: “A genus comprises a class of communicative events, the members of which share a set of
communicative objectives. These objectives are recognized by expert members of the parental discourse
community”.
Halliday (1978) thinks that language, by its use, is a form of socialization, which allows various forms
of the interpretation of social and socio-cultural relations. He explains that the contexts of language use
are never isolated. They are likely to reappear in other situations; which he (Halliday) calls the “types
of situation”. Thisreproduction of usage situations allows users to develop, over time, types of semantic
interaction in these contexts.
This semantic development in a framework of use is, according to Halliday (ibid), the language register.
By linking a context of use to a semantic situation and a grammatico-lexical model, the register refers
to the description of the domain of use of the language, and how the participants (the tenors) are
mutually linked.
The domain is the system of activities in a given environment that takes into account the participants,
their practices, and the circumstances. The concept of “tenors” sheds light on the social relationship
that exists between the participants involved and their interactions in the conversation. In other words,
genre theory aims at helping learners make appropriate language choices that match their needs or
social positions. The approach thus emphasizes the active involvement of the learner during the
learning process.
It is about the creation of a discursive community, that is to say, a community that shares the same
linguistic discourse in a given domain in order to achieve their goals and meet their communicative
needs. The analysis of this communicative need generally represents the starting point in an ESP
course.
14
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fce Frontiers of Contemporary Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 2023
3. Methodological Approach
3.1 Context of the Study
As a language specialist, we have been teaching ESP for years in several national and international
companies. For instance, we taught English at the African Development Bank (ADB) and the
Integrated Management Center (IMC) for more than one year. Through time, we had the opportunity to
test various approaches to ESP teaching. From this experience, we have come to the conclusion that the
best approach to meet learners’ needs is the integrated approach.
3.2 Population of the Study
Our learners were mainly composed of managers in different companies. We had to equip them with
the language they need to deal with their daily tasks in order to be effective in their domain. Among
many other tasks, they should be able to hold meetings, deal with conferences, read and understand
emails and chat with their colleagues in English.
3.3 Data Collection Procedures
For the collection of data in this study, we have used semi-structured interviews in order to collect
learners’ impressions of the teaching approach they have experienced. The purpose was to allow them
to have opinions and say what they feel about it. In other words, they should be able to say whether the
method helps meet their language need or not.
In so doing, we did the interview with learners from two different companies. They were three from
each company. We made the decision to make a synthesis of the opinions collected in company A,
which allowed us to have a general view of the group, which we named group 1. We did the samewith
the other company, which we named group 2. The interview was conducted in French to allow the
interviewees, express themselves freely and have much to say. Using the English language could lead
to speaking anxiety.
15
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fce Frontiers of Contemporary Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 2023
16
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fce Frontiers of Contemporary Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 2023
4.2 Discussions
Genre theory states that the focus should be on the process of language learning and acquisition.
Language skills and linguistics compounds should be presented as a whole and not in separate elements
(lexicon and grammar) because language is a whole set composed of structures, meanings, functions,
and others.
Therefore, none of these components goes without the others in a language acquisition process. In this
way, learning the language should allow learners to express meaning in various communication
contexts they face, as argued by Halliday (op.cit.), Swales (op.cit.), and Bathia (2004) ESP students
should therefore be equipped with means of communication that will increase their cultural background
in the professional community.
Concretely, the language forms taught must be specific to their domain and must, therefore, be
associated with linguistic knowledge. In other words, Courses in ESP should aim at developing
learners’ communicative skills and strategies according to their needs. We have to carefully identify
these skills and communicative strategies in order to effectively develop them.
The four main language skills should not be addressed in isolation during learning activities. Yet to be
able to write or even speak a second or foreign language, it is not enough to claim to know it. Instead, it
necessarily requires good oral comprehension without which it is not possible to communicate
effectively. When language skills are therefore not addressed in an integrated way, from a
communicative perspective, students cannot make a social use of it.
17
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fce Frontiers of Contemporary Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 2023
Our personal experience as a social learner-user of English edifies us on the possibility of fully and
exclusively acquiring language skills. Communication in real-life situations requires more than one
language skill. Therefore, teaching that integrates the four main language skills allows learners to
acquire the four skills simultaneously.
Two approaches to language teaching generally make it possible to integrate language skills. These are
content-based teaching and task-based teaching. The first emphasizes learning the language through
content that interests them (a subject, a theme, a series, a character, etc.), while the second insists on the
execution of tasks (solving situational problems) requiring the communicative use of language. In both
approaches, peer and group work is used to increase learner interaction and collaboration. In other
words, it is about developing tasks whose completion requires the holistic use of English to solve
problems related to real-life communication.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, rather than focusing on terminologies and isolated grammar points, ESP teachers and
practitioners must encourage the integrated approach to language teaching, especially ESP. In this way,
learners will be able to use language related to their field as a whole. In this case, the courses will give
students the opportunity to analyze both the formal and functional aspects of the language in social
and cultural contexts. They will then be more comfortable in their production of the language in their
professional life.
ESP courses should have more meaning. The development of authentic activities (activities which reflect
as faithfully as possible the use of English in the real life) is a means of giving the possibility to the
students to build and acquire global knowledge of the language, and not essentially isolated and
floating terminologies. As for the grammar rules, they will appear in contexts so that the learners can
learn them implicitly during the learning process. These grammar rules and terminologies will no
longer be the subject of decontextualized teaching.
References
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Glmenze, J. (2000). Email Communication: Some Emerging Tendencies in Register. English for
Special Purposes Journal, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00030-1
Halliday, M. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and
meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learner-Centered Approach.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
18
Published by SCHOLINK INC.
www.scholink.org/ojs/index.php/fce Frontiers of Contemporary Education Vol. 4, No. 3, 2023
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1992). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-centered approach.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1994). English for Specific Purposes. Glasgow: Cambridge University
Press.
Kone, K. (2022). Apprentissage par expérience et enseignement de l’Anglais de Spécialité (ASP): Les
cas de l’UFR des Sciences Médicales, UFHB (Doctoral dissertation). Abidjan: Felix Houphouët
Boigny University.
Nunan, D. (1988). Principles for designing language teaching materials. Guidelines, 10, 1-24.
Singapore: SEAMEO RELC.
Robinson, P. (1980). ESP. Oxford: Oxford Pergamon Press.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: Eng lish in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
19
Published by SCHOLINK INC.