See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/346006710

Biochar: Preparation, Properties and Applications in Sustainable Agriculture

Article · November 2019

CITATIONS READS
15 7,982

6 authors, including:

Ashaq Ahmad Dar Mohd Yousuf Rather

Pondicherry University St Joseph's University
27 PUBLICATIONS 179 CITATIONS 13 PUBLICATIONS 210 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Dr Javid Manzoor Wani Khursheed

Shri Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University ITM University
35 PUBLICATIONS 543 CITATIONS 115 PUBLICATIONS 775 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Dr Javid Manzoor on 18 November 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019)

ISSN No. (Print): 0975-1718

ISSN No. (Online): 2249-3247

Biochar: Preparation, Properties and Applications in Sustainable

Agriculture
Ashaq Ahmad Dar1, Mohd. Yousuf Rather1, Javid Manzoor2 Waseem Yaseen3 and Khursheed Ahmad Wani3
and Dheeraj Vasu4
1
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry India.
2
Department of Environmental Sciences, Shri JJT University, Rajasthan, India.
3
Department of Environmental Sciences, Govt. Degree College, Bijbehara, India.
4
Department of Botany, Safia Science College Bhopal, (M.P.), India.
(Corresponding author: Khursheed Ahmad Wani)
(Received 30 September, 2019, accepted 19 November, 2019)
(Published by Research Trend, Website: www.researchtrend.net)
ABSTRACT: A large number of population in the world is dependent on agriculture and its products.
However, with the growing population the need for different agricultural products has increased over a
period of time. The agricultural soil has been degraded by the use of synthetic fertilizers. Different methods
are developed by the researchers to restore the degraded soil ecosystems. Among the different options
available, use of biochar is a viable option. The biochar is carbon rich has emerged as a possible option for
restoration of degraded land and to increase agriculture efficiency in numerous frameworks and carbon
fixation. This paper is an attempt to study the applications of biochar for the sustainability of agricultural
ecosystems.
Keywords: Biochar, Soil, Degradation, Sustainable agriculture.

I. INTRODUCTION considered to be incompetent, environmentally

cataclysmic and unlikely to fulfil requisition (Barrow,
Sustainable agriculture is highly promoted as it is
2012). Furthermore, the global population which is
considered to be a safe practice as compared to
projected to rise to 9.6 billion by the mid of 21st
conventional method. With the ever-changing global
century, would eventually result in rising demand for
population's growing demands, a realistic solution to
food that too from shrinking arable land availability
sustainable agricultural activities has become
[134].
indispensable for nourishing. Soil degradation
Agriculture is one of the predominant producer of
processes viz., soil erosion, compaction, lack of water
greenhouse gas emission (GHG), particularly methane
holding capacity (WHC), reduced cation exchange
(52 %) and nitrous oxide (84 %), with just under 25%
capacity (CEC), acidification, poor fertility, organic and
of total human induced GHGs in the year 2014, mostly
inorganic contamination, salinization, urbanization and
attributable through land use shift and forestry [119].
changing climatic conditions jeopardizes global food
Hence, developing successful sustainable agriculture
stability contributing to extreme economic restrictions
practices that can reduce agricultural GHG emission
that entail the creation of innovative and
share with enhanced yield has become more urgent than
environmentally sustainable innovations that boost soil
ever. These shortcomings of green revolution set up the
quality and resilience [43]. Moreover, decreasing arable
scene for a revolutionary paradigm (Sustainable
land area as well as agriculture yield due to global
agriculture) establishing a collaboration of conventional
warming endanger people round the world through
farming structures with advanced technology schemes.
poverty and malnutrition. Sustainable agriculture is a
The campaign for sustainable agriculture started in
field of increasing contemplation as it focuses on viable
1980s and is an economically feasible, environmentally
ways of processing crops in an environmentally
responsible and socially equitable method of
sustainable, socially equitable and economically
agricultural development [84].
advantageous manner that can be maintained over the
There is a notable rise in research work on the usage of
long term [53].
naturally produced products to be incorporated in the
Sustainable agriculture is the integration of the
sustainable agriculture. Many of these bio-stimulants
biological, natural, technical, cultural, economic and
such as humic and fulvic acids, organo-mineral
social sciences in a holistic way to establish modern,
fertilizers and biochar which are environmentally
healthy and environmentally sustainable farming
benign are believed to enhance soil fertility, plant
practices [84].
growth thus, agronomic productivity apart from abiotic
The green revolution has fed the inevitably growing
and biotic stress tolerance [1, 14, 94, 125]. As a soil
population over the last 40 years, but is generally
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 29
additive generated from waste biomass through surface area and complex pore structure are cordial to
pyrolysis, biochar has earned noteworthy consideration microorganisms that plants need to assimilate
as a possible strategy to enhance the management of supplements from the ambient soil environment.
agriculture soils [99]. It is noteworthy that biochar is Therefore, the chapter examines the phytoremediation
effective in all forms of farming systems unlike other process, its context, and also discusses various methods,
organic materials [21, 137]. factors affecting the process, its advantages, and
Biochar, a pyrolytic organic material generated under disadvantages in view of the need to acquire
oxygen-deficient conditions within a temperature range information about biochar and its application in
of 300°C – 1000°C. The biochar being carbon rich has sustainable agriculture. By addressing the remediation
emerged as a possible option for restoration of degraded of mercury, cadmium, and lead-contaminated soils, the
land and to increase agriculture efficiency in numerous chapter also assesses the value of phytoremediation
frameworks and carbon fixation [74, 87]. The practice technology.
of using biochar in agronomy is not new and dates back Biochar: production and characteristics
to hundreds to thousands of years ago when Amazon Biochar, a pyrolytic product, produced from all organic
inhabitants generated it by heating to develop rich, materials such as forestry wastes, animal manures and
prolific soils called terra preta. Without extra crop residues via thermal decomposition under oxygen
fertilization, terra preta soils are reported to grow more deficient conditions [5]. Age-old traditional pyrolysis
than one harvest a year, in addition to exhibiting systems exhibit slower heating rates, thus holding the
slightly greater potential for cation exchange [46] material for a prolonged time period besides high
Steiner et al., 2008) and larger soil carbon stocks [46]. production yield (94% at 300°C and 23% at 750°C for
The potential of biochar to function as efficient soil hardwood) [63]. In contrast, fast-pyrolysis systems
alteration is somewhat similar to conventional slash and drastically reduce the residency time besides providing
burn agriculture practice. However, the custom of slash a range of products such as bio-liquid apart from
and burn has an adverse environmental legacy as it is biochar and syngas [48] depending upon the
directly related to erosion and also retards the ambient temperature, heating rate, vapor residency time and
air quality. The processing of biochar in contrast, a reaction time during pyrolysis [123]. Biochar produced
regulated method will produce higher yield and have with the latter process includes a fraction of labile
less adverse environmental consequences. Biochar unpyrolysed biomass supporting a carbon loss in
being impervious to microbial deterioration due to its addition to greater microbial content. Moreover,
obstinate aromatic carbon structure can retain in the soil quickly pyrolysed material can possibly sequester
as long as 100 – 1000 years thereby increasing and carbon supplying a base for N retention at the same
releasing soil organic carbon slowly. Nevertheless, such time. It was demonstrated that production curtailment
attributes make biochar an excellent soil additive to be appeared with scaling-up processing temperature,
used in sustainable agriculture [74]. despite stimulating conclusive alterations to biochar
Despite the fact that biochar application has produced structure [7]. Moreover, feedstock moisture content
some variable results contingent upon soil quality, firmly impacts the effectiveness of pyrolysis. Feedstock
feedstock for biochar preparation, pyrolysis with a moisture content of <10% is preferred [105].
temperature, and other natural elements. There are Biochar properties fluctuating with processing
various potential implications related with the temperature include pH, volatile matter, while the feed-
utilization of biochar added either alone or in dependent properties are absolute carbon content, ash
conjunction with calcareous material or inoculant [25, content, cation exchange capacity, thermal stability,
102] viz., enhanced soil nutrient accessibility and their production rate and mineral composition [5, 151]. As
absorption [113, 156] upgraded fertilizer (both organic the biochar production varies with the processing
and inorganic) use proficiency [125], ameliorate soil pH temperature despite from the same feed material, a
[75], improved mineral nitrogen retention [30], reduced blend of optimal pyrolysis parameters, in particularly
nitrogen loses and demand for fertilizers (Ding et al., the temperature and kind of feedstock, ought to be
2016) [33], increased seed germination success rate, chosen for the nature of biochar required for farming
strengthening soil properties [10], improved base and ecological purposes.
saturation and liming impact on acidic soils [141], Biochar usually display alkaline pH, with the exception
heavy metal fixation colonies [3, 100] incitement of of certain softwood (e.g. pinewood) and hardwood (e.g.
microbial [154], improved crop productivity, efficiency black locust wood) tree biomass as they exhibited a
and enzyme production [58], improved leguminous neutral or just under neutral pH and thus, can find
symbiotic N fixation (Mia et al., 2014), safeguards applications to treat alkaline soils. In contrast to pH,
plants and soil from detrimental impacts of salinity, CEC of biochar is more reliant on feeding material
drought and heat stress [4, 36, 39]. Biochar additionally (higher in crop straw derived biochar), which could be
provides a worldwide negative emanation capability of linked with degradation of certain functional groups of
0.7 Pg C yr−1, and has been demonstrated to be acidic nature, as opposed to pyrolysis temperature [71,
successful for decreasing soil greenhouse gas fluxes in 151]. However, ash content fluctuates with both
certain contexts thereby, besides curtailing methane feedstock incorporated and processing temperature [37,
fluxes from paddy cultivation thereby increasing 71]. It was also reported that ash content showed a
microbial activity and minimizing shifts in the global correlation with electric conductivity, CEC, pH, and
climate while managing biowaste [8, 51, 116]. Its mineral composition [8, 151]. Similarly, electric
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 30
conductivity also varies significantly with material used acidic or alkaline biochar capable altering the soil as
and also with operating temperature [7, 115]. From per plant requirements.
agriculture perspective, salt concentration is crucial as Electric conductivity is another essential feature
many crops are prone to high salinity in soil or water regulating the crop quality as well as productivity.
system. Nonetheless, for structuring biochar, the salt Biochar has been reported to increase electric
concentration of the biochar ought to be thought of conductivity ranging from 2 – 85 %. Application of
(Laghari et al., 2016) [71]. Although the elemental biochar with ash containing soluble salts can lead to
composition of the biochar mainly depends upon the improvements in electric conductivity [56]. Cation
biomass used, the role of the processing temperature exchange capacity is an indirect measure of the ability
cannot be underestimated. For example, nutrient to retain water and other nutrients and contaminants and
content of the biochar increases with the temperature can reach up to 50 cmol (+) kg-1 in biochar [56, 75,
elevation (C and N), mainly ascribed to thermochemical 138]. As soon as the biochar is applied to the soil gets
transformation under oxygen-deficient conditions, up to exposed to ambient water and oxygen causing
certain extent (˂ 700°C), nevertheless P and K loss was unconstrained surface oxidation prompting to elevated
reported thereafter [69, 148]. It is generally believed anions and hence higher CEC value [2]. The CEC of
that low-pyrolysis temperature biochar (300–500ºC) the transformed soil can be adjusted dramatically
can have a stronger effect on agrarian framework that depending on the nature of biomass used and
could be due to increased surface area, aliphatic processing temperature [108]. Slow pyrolyzedbiochars
compounds, CEC, labile carbon, hydrophobicity, have moderately high CEC characteristic of its potential
nutrients, and lower alkalinity and salinity, whereas, for soil improvement [56, 130]. Loss of aromatic
fast pyrolyzed biochar contains more aromatic carbon through oxidation and formation of carboxylic
compounds and fixed carbon, and is ideal for soil groups in the biochar may be the reason behind CEC
carbon sequestration [7]. Following the improvement within the soil matrix [45]. Moreover,
recommendations of the International Biochar Initiative with time there is an increase in surface area
(IBI) biochar is portrayed by proximate investigation accompanied by negative surface charge and CEC
i.e., fixed, carbon, ash and moisture contents, and [129]. Therefore, biochar can serve as a sink as well as
volatile matter, essential examination i.e., C, H, O and source for most nutrients that influence plant growth
N, and chemical and structural investigation i.e., pore and development and is recommended low fertility
size, functional groups, pH, EC etc. weathered soils [129]. As the biochar materials display
Biochar as soil physico-chemical ameliorator broader surface area with low bulk density owing to a
Biochar induced changes in both physical and chemical wide range of pores [35], their application to the soil
properties of the soil can improve the plant growth and increases the same thus improving physical properties
hence productivity. The soil pH is considered as an such as soil aeration, soil structure, density, water
important parameter governing soil fertility. Alterations retention potential etc [26, 35]. Biochar additionally
in the soil pH can improve soil conditions and enhance influences the C/N content of the soil, a key parameter
soil nutrient accessibility to grow plants and in altering several other soil properties [140].
biochemical reactivity. The adjustment of the soil The availability of water in the soil is fundamental for
condition likewise encourages microbial action and plant growth. Porosity, soil aggregate stability, and
quickens chemical responses in the rhizosphere [54]. various other hydrological functions are affected with
Several investigations demonstrate that biochar biochar application through several mechanisms [50].
application can amend pH with application rate. Use of biochar (≥ 15 Mg ha-1) is a competent method
Because of the alkaline aspect of certain biochars the for improving soil water retention capability and bio-
beneficial impact is more prominent for acidic soils [75, availability, besides other hydrological properties
78]. The low soil pH in temperate soils can be increased directly or indirectly via high surface area and increase
by treating it with beech wood biochar of alkaline in organic carbon, respectively [15, 97, 98, 120, 121,
nature thereby improving the alkaline phosphatase 146]. Furthermore, findings propose that the use of low-
activity in the soil matrix [18, 49]. Such findings reflect density biochar amend the overall porosity and
shifts in microbial behaviour induced by soil pH aggregation, and hence can diminish the bulk density of
differences as biochar is added. Moreover, soil pH the biochar modified soils up to 12% [16, 86]. The
increment in savannaoxisols upon biochar introduction decrease can be linearly or quadratically with biochar
is ascribed to an expansion of Ca and Mg accessibility application and is more prominent in coarse-textured
thus promoting crop production [90]. Soil acidity (14.2 %) as compared to fine-textured soils (9.2%) [16,
leading to aluminium toxicity with calcium, magnesium 44, 86, 106]. The large surface area and high porosity
and phosphorus deficiencies are major threat to crop governs the alterations in the tensile strength (42 –
production as 30% of global arable lands are acidic [38, 242%) of the biochar-soil matrix, that in turn can
153]. Biochar of alkaline nature can be used to treat influence root penetration through soil, seed
such soils to overcome the acidity problem besides germination, tillability and other various processes [19].
weathered soils [78]. However, biochar prepared from However, other factors such as bonds among the soil
pine sawdust is predicted to display the contrasting particles, friction, forces, clay and mineral content of
effect i.e., decrease in soil pH, in sandy soils and the the soil, binding mediators, microstructural properties,
effect varies with the application rate [69]. In this and organic carbon strongly determines can have a
manner, care ought to be taken in choosing the suitable profound impact on soil tensile strength.
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 31
Fig. 1. Factors including soil properties, biochar properties, and management scenarios, and their interactions affect
the impact of biochar application on soil physical properties.

Biochar is also known to mitigate soil erosion activities to cut out surplus CO2 can enhance farmers’
significantly depending upon the rate of biochar production and economy, thus helping to reduce the
application possibly due to the micro-aggregate negative impacts of climate change. Biochar
formations [59, 110]. Moreover, surface runoff and preparation and its stockpiling in soil has been proposed
leaching leading to nutrient loss in farmlands can also as one the potential method for diminishing the CO2
be reduced to some extent. These mitigating impacts of concentration [72, 81]. Techniques of converting plant
biochar on soil overflow and disintegration of soil biomass to biochar can diminish CO2 outflows by
particles might be credited to the improved water balancing out carbon [73, 90, 127]. Biochar formation
retention capacity in addition to various other physical significantly lowers CO2 in the environment, since the
characteristics. Furthermore, if the climate change mechanism takes a hypothetically carbon-neutral form
prompts much severe dry spells, biochar with of biologically rotting material and converts it into
significant positive effect on holding soil water can be carbon-negative. Biochar stagnates the rotting matter
an option [74]. Taking all these beneficial results into and associated CO2 and places it on the earth to remain
account the use of biochar in sustainable agriculture for hundreds or perhaps thousands of years.
may be an efficient method to reduce field losses due to Notwithstanding, the degradable bit of biochar is
soil erosion. exceptionally little and decayed rapidly when
Biochar and greenhouse gas emissions. contrasted with the time it takes to sequester the non-
Anthropogenic CO2 effluxes have been rising recklessly mineralized component [20, 61]. Moreover, biochar
pushing Earth’s biomes on a trajectory triggering a disintegration was moderately gradual during the initial
rapid change in the climate that is dangerous besides three months following its expansion to the soil, and
irretrievable. Comprehensively, human actions are thereafter moderate, halfway decay happened during
liable for the allocation of 16 Pg C yr-1, which amounts the accompanying 3.2 years [68]. It has been
to 24% of the main net earth production [144]. The conjectured that biochar may enhance microbial activity
food and agriculture organization has reported that by complex soil organic matter with biochar surface
agriculture GHG emissions secure the fifth spot and at the same time trigger the poor priming of natural
contributing approximately 24% of the cumulative carbon mineralization within the soil [83, 145]. The
anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions [40, 117]. The conglomeration of SOCs on biochar particles can result
CO2 emitted through soil biota respiration is around in the coordination and integration of substrates,
multiple times higher contrasted with that delivered nutrients in addition to microbial biota and thus
from the burning fossil fuel derivatives [96]. To alter encourage greater efficiency of C-utilisation by the
this trajectory, a judicious and determined program of latter [80]. The activity of glucosidase and
mitigating undesirable change is looked-for. To cellobiosidase, the carbohydrate mineralising enzymes
stabilize mean surface temperature, overall human- may also decrease upon biochar application in contrast
induced GHG outflows need to be kept under the to other enzymes such as alkaline phosphatase [60].
maximum cut-off limit. Thus, adopting climate-smart Abiotic responses may likewise add to the concealment
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 32
of soil CO2 discharges. The biochar aided with alkaline A total of 151% increase in methane production have
metals and has high pH may precipitate CO2 in the form been recorded since industrial revolution (IPCC, 2007)
of carbonates on the biochar surface [24, 62], 80]. [57], and is currently expanding at a pace of 3 × 10-3 m
Similarly, in the forest ecosystem, inorganic nitrogen mol mol-1 yr-1 [17, 22], which is expected to rise further
governs the soil respiration and carbon mineralization. due to the growing global demands. According to FAO,
The reduction in root respiration upon biochar (2008) [167] methane emissions by the end of 2050 are
application can be either by decreasing root activities or expected to rise exponentially with meat and dairy
by destroying the established roots. Despite the lack of demands. Agriculture represents 10 – 12 % of
live roots, soil CO2 emissions with biochar alteration cumulative worldwide anthropogenic greenhouse
showed that variations in live root behaviour could not outflows which incorporates half of the total methane
clarify the concealment of soil CO2 outflows. The outflows [117]. While trying to relieve the antagonistic
sustainable application of biochar can potentially offset impacts of expanding CH4 emanation, attempts have
as high as 12 % of human-induced CO2 - C e emissions been made to limit methane outflows, fundamentally
globally i.e., 1.8 of the 15.4 Pg CO2 - C e yr-1 released, from anthropogenic destinations.
and that the cumulative net offset from biochar over ten Methanogenic microbes under anaerobic waterlogged
decades will be 130 Pg CO2 - C e. The biochar environment led to the emission of methane by a
alterations in Miscanthus crop soil exhibited the ability process known as methanogenesis. In contrast, aerobic
to minimize soil CO2 eq emissions up to 33% on ambient conditions favours methanotrophic bacteria
average over a couple of years and total soil CO2 eq particularly α- and γ-proteobacteria and also facultative
emissions were lowered by 37 % (main paper). methanotrophs of genera Methylocapsa and
Eventually, biochar application has been appeared to Methylocella responsible for methane reduction [67,
stifle or effectively affect soil CO2 emanations, with a 101]. The equilibrium between the two imperative
couple of remarkable exemptions in long term microbial processes that too depends on soil
investigations [90, 124, 142]. physiochemical and biological parameters, determines
The climate mitigation ability of biochar derived the net methane transition between soil and the ambient
mainly from its extremely recalcitrant existence with environment. The products of the anaerobic
under 1 % degradation of biochar after its application disintegration of natural soil organic carbon and
which delays the pace of fixed carbon return to the exogenous organic content serve as the substrate for
atmosphere [68]. The factors determining the carbon methanogens (Dalal et al., 2008) which can however be
footprint of biochar include pyrolysis temperature, soil inhibited by electron acceptors within the soil. Methane
parameters, decay rate, the carbon intensity of the fuel oxidation is an enzyme-dependent reaction performed
as well as the type of biomass used [52]. Pyrolysis via CH4-assimilating bacteria and autotrophic NH4-
temperature assumes an indispensable function in the oxidizing bacteria by means of enzymes methane
biochar mineralization and accordingly CO2 outflow monooxygenase and ammonium monooxidase
from the soil. Biochar synthesized at a temperature respectively, both of which require O2 which is closely
under 400°C animates C mineralization which interrelated to soil texture and moisture content. In spite
diminishes with expanding pyrolysis temperature [155]. of the fact that methanotrophs can tolerate drastic acidic
The pyrolysis temperature variations prompt and saline conditions, their ideal operation usually
noteworthy changes in physiochemical structure as well happens within a relatively limited scope of pH 5.0–7.5.
as composition liable for CO2 emissions as found in few It ought to be noted that natural or fertiliser induced
investigations [9, 12, 95, 112]. Moreover, the decay ammonium ion release in soil often presents
pace of biochar and eventually CO2 discharge shift competitive constraints to methane oxidation. Studies
under fluctuating soil conditions, viz., hydrological indicate that biochar influences these development
conditions, and local soil natural carbon content [66, processes by preventing the production of CH4 through
95]. The temperature at which biochar is synthesized activities that include optimising soil diffusion of O2 by
and the nature of feedstock material decide the level of soil moisture, soil compaction and soil fertility control.
polarity (O/C ratio) just as the aromaticity (H/C ratio) Biochar application purports to causes improved
of the synthesized biochar. Low H/C ratio and high H/C aeration and water content of soil, increase pH,
ratio show the nearness of a higher measure of labile C decrease bulk density and increased CH4 soil diffusion
and subsequently more CO2 discharge from the soil which eliminates anoxic conditions, which may forbid
[65] and vice versa [28]. Subsequently, biochar can be [107] or incite CH4 oxidation [111, 122, 149, 152] or
utilized to remove more atmospheric CO2 and its often both [34, 41, 104]. Mechanical drivers behind
utilization can be a viable way to deal with the climate these processes are only assumed and mostly remains
battle in the coming future. ambiguous. The suppression in CH4 oxidation may
Methane mitigation methodologies exhibit ecological, likewise happen because of stifled microbial activity
social, financial and food security significance in view attributable to toxic or inhibitory compounds found in
of its high global warming potential, which is 25 times the biochar [122]. Biochar application can shorten the
than of CO2 over a century [132, 150]. The most N cycle by restricting the accessibility of N substrates
significant natural, sources of CH4 are characteristic to microbial organisms, reducing CH4 production, and
wetlands (27%); fossil fuel derived products (18%); thereby upholding methanotrophy. Likewise, biochar is
cattle ranching (18%); rice paddies (11%); termites also known to act as biofilter to boost methanotrophic
(4%); and seas and hydrates (3%), and human-induced methane utilisation under anoxic environments and
are burning of biomass (10%) and landfills (9%) [30]. hence cut methane emissions [41, 103]. However, few
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 33
investigations reported that despite supressing N2 O in administering N2O releases. The level of N2O
emissions biochar application promoted a methane emissions is additionally affected by the aromaticity
swapping scenario [64, 152]. and stability of the oxidizable component of biochar
N2O is one of the most active (298 times than CO2) followed by a slower deterioration of recalcitrant,
greenhouse gases emitted from both natural and steady fraction. Hypothetically, the proportion of
anthropogenic sources (3:2). Earthbound N2O outflows nitrifiers to denitrifiers is influenced by biochar
have expanded from 10 – 12 Tg N2O-N yr-1 in 1990 – application in soil. Biochar can also prolong the
2000 and could exceed 16 Tg N2O-N yr-1 by 2050 deterioration of soil organic matter by-soil
[166]. Because of the widespread use of engineered conglomeration, thus affecting aeration and at last N2O
nitrogenic fertilizers, farming is the fundamental source emissions [83]. Via many interconnected pathways,
(90%) of global anthropogenic N2O emanation [47]. biochar can influence N2O development making it a test
Even though few investigations depicted that N2O is to define a particular system for mitigating N2O.
generated employing abiotic redox reactions, it is However, the impact of biochar on soil N2O outflows is
generated mainly by microbial transformations of not generally certain.
reactive N in soil [11, 23, 109, 111, 133]. Besides, soil Biochar and crop production
can serve as a source as well as a sink for N2O. Bacteria The observed repercussions on crop production diverge
of both autotrophic, as well as heterotrophic nature, are based on connexions among the nature of biochar
known to utilize N2O, thereafter changing it to N2 [27]. applied, crop being examined, the soil type, ambient
Two important cycles i.e., nitrification and climatic and ecological factors, biochar ingredients,
denitrification, that drive evolution of N2O and enhance circumstances under which the biochar is generated,
N available to plants, is a successful procedure to soil physicochemical and biological properties, and trial
diminish N losses [32, 92]. Many investigations have conditions. By and large, the effects of biochar on crop
suggested that biochar use in agriculture fields could profitability are more articulated in well weathered
influence the transformations and fate of N [114, 136]. supplement poor and acidic soils overwhelmed by clay
In addition, soybean and grass-covered biochar applied mineral kaolinite and weathered products of Fe/Al-rich
fields revealed a 50 – 80 % reduction in N2O emissions silicates i.e., sesquioxides as in humid tropics. In
[107]. Incitement and restraint of N2O emanation by contrast, numerous other studies have indicated only
biochar relies on the underlying moisture content of the minor improvements or even declines in grain yield
soil during the period of soil rewetting [147]. Nitrogen with biochar formulations in supplement-rich soils
available to soil biota harbor organic and inorganic N [136] which might be because of the utilization of
species along with nitrate and ammonium, which are alkaline biochar that as of now have a high pH [164],
promptly used by biota [55]. Biochar is known to immobilization of accessible N in the soil [20] and the
decrease the nitrogen that is accessible for existence of phytotoxic substances viz., heavy metals
denitrification as soil ammonium retention under and PAHs in biochar, which may slow down plant
biochar application is greatly enhanced [114, 126]. growth. Although a few investigations have observed
With biochar addition, the NH4-N and NO 3-N content expanded harvest profitability from utilizing biochar
diminish hence N2O emission [139]. The level of N2 O alone (Chan et al., 2009), several other experimental
emission decrease under biochar application likewise studies have noticed a more optimistic response when
relies upon the feedstock used, age, and pace of biochar biochar is applied along with fertilizers [127]. A
utilized, conditions under which the pyrolysis was suitable proportion of biochar and synthetic fertilizer
carried out, and also the soil type and its moisture had reported to multiple the yield of Oryzasativa and
content. Biochar produced from different feedstocks Sorghum bicolorcontrast with chemical fertilizer alone
under varying temperature reigns [148] and its degree [127]. Mau and Utami (2014) [163] additionally
of application, reported a significant nitrate absorbing reported an increment in the yield of Zea mays because
potential with the biochar synthesized at a higher of improved P accessibility and take-up under
temperature and also at higher application rate. Freshly consolidated utilization of biochar and arbuscular
prepared biochar use in low-inorganic nitrogen soils mycorrhiza fungal spores.
can immobilize considerable aggregate of inorganic The beneficial implications of biochar on crop
nitrogen, restricting the substrate accessible to soil production are typically ascribed to (a) direct
nitrifiers and denitrifiers for N2O emanation [29, 131]. accessibility of fundamental essential nutrients such as
Moreover, pH, C: N ratio of the biochar applied also N, P, K, Ca, and Mg, from biochar applied [162]. An
interferes with the soil N cycle by directly or indirectly overall increase in the nitrogen was observed after the
governing the N turnover and hence N2O release. The addition of biochar [160]. However, this does not mean
basic properties of biochar enhance the soil pH which that a lesser quantity of N fertilizer is required, as N in
facilitates the activity of enzymes viz., N2O reductase, biochar is not accessible to plant biota; rather, it is
and vice versa for reductases associated with the mixed in the C matrix. Consequently, the ability of
transformation of nitrite to N2O via nitrate [147]. To biochar to minimize fertilizer necessities stays
accomplish a decrease in N2O emissions, the C: N muddled. (b) the alkaline effect induced by biochar
proportion of the feedstock ought to be ≥ 30 so the application on acidic soils. Moreover [108] have
resulting biochar would induce immobilization of C and attributed the boost of bean production due to the rise in
N, subsequently lessening the discharges. Thus, biochar soil pH besides soil nutrients due to biochar use. (c)
properties relying on feedstock and pyrolysis conditions improvement of soil CEC attributable to permeable
particularly C, pH, and NO3 are the central participants nature and high surface area of biochar [161], (d)
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 34
improving the physical state of soil by improved soil chemical composition of biochar produced from
water-holding capability, decreased soil bulk density, conocarpus wastes. Bioresource Technology, 131, 374–
and improved stabilization of soil structure. Collins 379.
(2008) [160] reported a noteworthy improvement in soil [8]. Ameloot, N.; De Neve, S.; Jegajeevagan, K.;
water holding limit on silt loam soils when compared to Yildiz, G.; Buchan, D.; Funkuin, Y. N.; Prins, W.;
sandy soil. This might increase yield output in dryland Bouckaert, L.; Sleutel, S. (2013). Short-term CO2 and
regions that is often under water stress. Jeffery et al., N2O emissions and microbial properties of biochar
(2011) [58] also reported an overall limited but amended sandy loam soils. Soil Biology and
substantial positive change in yield upon biochar Biochemistry, 57, 401–410.
application, and described an increase in soil WHC [9]. Asadullah M, Zhang S, Min Z, Yimsiri P, Li CZ
besides an increase in soil pH as the key factors, (e) (2010). Effects of biomass char structure on its
efficient nutrient use, [10], (f) stabilization of gasification reactivity. Bioresour Technol, 101(20):
phytotoxic components in soils and elimination of their 7935–7943.
availability to plants [159], and (g) incitement of [10]. Atkinson, C. J.; Fitzgerald, J. D. Hipps, N. A.
biological nitrogen fixation and nodulation [162] in (2010). Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural
legumes which may be due to elevated amounts of benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: A
available [8], stimulatory impact on the development of review. Plant and Soil, 337, 1–18.
nodules, available N immobilization, or increase in soil [11]. Baggs, E.M. (2011). Soil microbial sources of
pH upon biochar addition [158], (h) slow release of nitrous oxide: recent advances in knowledge, emerging
essential nutrients, stability of higher organic matter challenges and future direction. CurrOpin Environ
and maintenance of ions (Lehmann 2007). These useful Sustain 3: 321–327.
impacts of biochar may help to resolve land constraints, [12]. Baldock J.A, & Smernik R.J. (2002). Chemical
and can likewise have pertinence to land restoration and composition and bioavailability of thermally altered
remediation [157]. Pinusresinosa (Red pine) wood. Org Geochem
33:1093–1109.
II. CONCLUSION
[13]. C. J. (2012). Biochar: potential for countering land
The research has revealed that biochar is a sustainable degradation and for improving agriculture. Applied
tool to restore the degraded soil ecosystems. It has not Geography, 34, 21–28.
only proved effective in management of soil but is [14]. Beesley, L.; Moreno-Jiménez, E.; Gomez-Eyles, J.
considered as eco friendly technique as compared to L.; Harris, E.; Robinson, B.; Sizmur, T. (2011). A
synthetic fertilizers. Most of the studies have revealed review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation,
substantial crop improvements by the use of biochar. revegetation and restoration of contaminated soils.
Biochar has become a promising stabilizer in methane Environmental Pollution, 159, 3269–3282.
mitigation in agriculture sector and may help to reduce [15]. Blanco-Canqui, H. & Lal, R. (2004). Mechanisms
green house emissions as well. of carbon sequestration in soil aggregates. Critical
Reviews in Plant Sciences, 23, 481–504.
REFERENCES [16]. Blanco-Canqui, H. (2017). Boiochar and soil
[1]. Abd El-Mageed, T., & Semida, W. M. (2015). physical properties. Soil Science Society of America
Organo mineral fertilizer can mitigate water stress for Journal, 81, 687–711.
cucumber production (Cucumis sativus L.). [17]. Bloom, A.A., Palmer, P.I., Fraser, A., Reay, D.S.,
Agricultural Water Management, 159, 1–10. Frankenberg, C., (2010). Large-scale controls of
[2]. Agegnehu, G., Srivastava, A.K., Bird, M.I. (2017). methanogenesis inferred from methane and gravity
The role of biochar and biocharcompost in improving spaceborne data. Science 327, 322e325.
soil quality and crop performance: A review. Appl. Soil [18]. Borchard, N., Wolf, A., Laabs, V., Aeckersberg,
Ecol. 119, 156–170. R., Scherer, H., Moeller, A., Amelung, W., (2012).
[3]. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J., Zhang, M., Physical activation of biochar and its meaning for soil
Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S., Ok, Y. fertility and nutrient leaching–a greenhouse experiment.
(2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant Soil Use Manag., 28 (2), 177–184.
management in soil and water: A review. Chemosphere, [19]. Brewer, C.E., Chuang, V.J., Masiello, C.A.,
99, 19–33. Gonnermann, H., Gao, X., Dugan, B., Driver, L.E.,
[4]. Ali, S., Rizwan, M., Qayyum, M. F., Ok, Y. S., Panzacchi, P., Zygourakis, K., Davies, C.A., (2014).
Ibrahim, M., Riaz, M., & Shahzad, A. N. (2017). New approaches to measuring biochar density and
Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and porosity. Biomass and Bioenergy, 66, 176–185.
salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environmental [20]. Bruun EW, Ambus P, Egsgaard H, Hauggaard-
Science and Pollution Research, 24(14), 12700-12712. Nielsen H. (2012). Effects of slow and fast pyrolysis
[5]. Al-Wabel, M. I.; Shahzad, A. N. (2017). Biochar biochar on soil C and N turnover dynamics. Soil
soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress BiolBiochem, 46:73–79
in plants: A critical review. Environmental Science and [21]. Bruun, E. W.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Ibrahim,
Pollution Research, 24, 12700–12712. N.; Egsgaard, H.; Ambus, P.; Jensen, P. A.; Dam-
[7]. Al-Wabel, MI.; Al-Omran, A.; El-Naggar, A. H.; Johansen, K. (2011). Influence of fast pyrolysis
Nadeem, M., Usman, A. R. (2013). Pyrolysis temperature on biochar labile fraction and short-term
temperature induced changes in characteristics and carbon loss in a loamy soil. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35,
1182–1189.
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 35
[22]. Butenhoff, C.L., Khalil, M.A.K., (2007). Global [36]. Drake, J. A.; Cavagnaro, T. R.; Cunningham, S.
methane emissions from terrestrial plants. Environ. Sci. C.; Jackson, W. R.; Patti, A. F. (2016). Does biochar
Technol. 41, 4032e4037. improve establishment of tree seedlings in saline sodic
[23]. Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E.M., Dannenmann, soils? Land Degradation & Development, 27, 52–59.
M., Kiese R., Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. (2013). [37]. Enders, A.; Hanley, K.; Whitman, T.; Joseph, S.;
Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we & Lehmann, J. (2012). Characterization of biochars to
understand the processes and their controls? Philos evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance.
Trans R SocLond B: Biol. Sci., 368: 20130122. Bioresource Technology, 114: 644–653.
[24]. Case, S.D.C., McNamara, N.P., Reay, D.S., [38]. Fageria, N., & Baligar, V., (2008). Ameliorating
Whitaker, J., (2012). The effect of biochar addition on soil acidity of tropical Oxisols by liming for sustainable
N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil – The crop production. Adv. Agron. 99, 345–399.
role of soil aeration. Soil BiolBiochem., 51, 125–134. [39]. Fahad, S.; Hussain, S.; Saud, S.; Hassan, S.;
[25]. Castro, A.; da Silva Batista, N.; Latawiec, A. E.; Tanveer, M.; Ihsan, M. Z.; Shah, A. N.; Ullah, A.;
Rodrigues, A.; Strassburg, B.; Silva, D.; Araujo, E.; de Nasrullah, K. F.; Ullah, S.; Alharby, H.; Nasim, W.;
Moraes, L. F. D.; Guerra, J. G.; Galvão, G.; Alves- Wu, C.; Huang, J. (2016). A combined application of
Pinto, H.; Mendes, M.; dos Santos, J. S.; Rangel, M. C.; biochar and phosphorus alleviates heat-induced
Figueredo, M.; Cornelissen, G.; Hale, S. (2018). The adversities on physiological, agronomical and quality
Effects of Gliricidia-Derived Biochar on Sequential attributes of rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,
Maize and Bean Farming. Sustainability, 10, 578. 103, 191–198.
[26]. Chan, K.Y., Xu, Z., (2009). Biochar: nutrient [40]. FAO, (2016). The State of Food and Agriculture:
properties and their enhancement. Biochar for Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security. Food
Environmental Management: Science and Technology. and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Earthscan, London, UK, 67–84. (FAO), Rome, Italy (p. 194).
[27]. Chapuis-Lardy L., Wrage N., Metay A., Chotte [41]. Feng, Y.Z., Xu, Y.P., Yu, Y.C., Xie, Z.B., & Lin,
J.L., & Bernoux M. (2007). Soils, a sink for N2O? A X.G. (2012). Mechanisms of biochar decreasing
review. Global Chang Biol., 13: 1–17. methane emission from Chinese paddy soils. Soil Biol
[28]. Chun Y., Sheng G., Chiou, C.T., & Xing, B. Biochem., 46:80–88
(2004). Compositions and sorptive properties of crop [42]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
residue-derived chars. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(17): Nations (2008). “The State of Food Insecurity in the
4649–4655 World 2008. High food prices and food security –
[29]. Clough T.J., & Condron L. M. (2010). Biochar, threats and opportunities,” in The State of the World,
and the nitrogen cycle: introduction. Journal of (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the
Environment Quality, 39, 1218. United Nations). Available at:
[30]. Clough, T.; Condron, L.; Kammann, C. & Müller, http://www.fao.org/3/i0291e/i0291e00.htm.
C. (2013). A review of biochar and soil nitrogen [43]. Gisladottir, G.; & Stocking, M. (2005). Land
dynamics. Agronomy, 3, 275–293. degradation control and its global environmental
[30]. Conrad, R. (2009). The global methane cycle: benefits. Land Degradation & Development, 16, 99–
recent advances in understanding the microbial 112.
processes involved. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1(5), [44]. Głąb, T., J. Palmowska, T. Zaleski, and K.
285−292. Gondek (2016). Effect of biochar application on soil
[31]. Dalal R.C., Allen D.E., Livesley S.J., & Richards hydrological properties and physical quality of sandy
G. (2008). Magnitude and biophysical regulators of soil. Geoderma, 281: 11–20.
methane emission and consumption in the Australian [45]. Glaser, B., Lehmann, J., & Zech, W., (2002).
agricultural, forest, and submerged landscapes: A Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of
review. Plant and Soil 309: 43–76. highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - A
[32]. Davidson, E.A., Swank, W.T., & Perry, T.O. review. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35, 219–230.
(1986). Distinguishing between nitrification and [46]. Glaser, B.; Haumaier, L.; Guggenberger, G.; &
denitrification as sources of gaseous nitrogen Zech, W. (2001). The “Terra Preta” phenomenon: a
production in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol., 52: 1280– model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics.
1286. Die Naturwissenschaften, 88, 37–41.
[33]. Ding, Y.; Liu, Y. G.; Liu, S. B.; Li, Z. W.; Tan, X. [47]. Gogoi, N.; Sarma, B.; Mondal, S. C.; Kataki, R.;
F.; Huang, X. X.; Zeng, G. M.; Zhou, L.; Zheng, B. H. & Garg, A. (2019). Use of Biochar in Sustainable
(2016). Biochar to improve soil fertility. A review. Agriculture, Innovations in Sustainable Agriculture,
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23169-9_16.
[34]. Dong, D., Yang, M., Wang, C., Wang, H., Li, Y., [48]. Grierson, S.; Strezov, V.; Shah, P. (2011).
Luo, J., & Wu, W. (2013). Responses of methane Properties of oil and char derived from slow pyrolysis
emissions and rice yield to applications of biochar and of Tetraselmischui. Bioresource Technology, 102,
straw in a paddy field. J. Soils Sediments, 13(8):1450– 8232–8240.
1460. [49]. Gul, S., & Whalen, J.K., (2016). Biochemical
[35]. Downie, A., Crosky, A., Munroe, P., (2009). cycling of nitrogen and phosphorus in biocharamended
Physical properties of biochar. Biochar for soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 103, 1–15.
Environmental Management. Science and Technology, [50]. Hardie, M., Clothier, B., Bound, S., Oliver, G., &
416. Close, D., (2014). Does biochar influence soil physical
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 36
properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil, 376, [64]. Karhu, K., Mattila, T., Bergström, I.., & Regina,
347–361. K. (2011). Biochar addition to agricultural soil
[51]. He, Y.; Zhou, X.; Jiang, L.; Li, M.; Du, Z.; Zhou, increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—
G.; Shao, J.; Wang, X.; Xu, Z.; Hosseini Bai, S.; Results from a short-term pilot field study. Agriculture,
Wallace, H.; & Xu, C. (2017). Effects of biochar Ecosystems and Environment, 140: 309–313.
application on soil greenhouse gas fluxes: a meta- [65]. Khodadad, C.L.M., Zimmerman, A.R., Uthandi,
analysis. GCB Bioenergy, 9, 743–755. S., Green, S.J.J., & Foster, J.S. (2011). Taxa-specific
[52]. Heitkötter, J., & Marschner, B. (2015). Interactive changes in soil microbial composition induced by
effects of biochar ageing in soils related to feedstock, pyrogenic carbon amendments. Soil BiolBiochem., 43:
pyrolysis temperature, and historic charcoal production. 385–392
Geoderma, 245–246, 56–64. [66]. Kimetu, J.M., & Lehmann, J. (2010). Stability and
[53]. Hester R. E.; & Harrison R. M. (2005). stabilisation of biochar and green manure in soil with
Sustainability in agriculture. Royal Society of different organic carbon contents. Aust. J. Soil Res., 48:
Chemistry, Cambridge, UK. 577–585
[54]. Hinsinger, P., (2001). Bioavailability of soil [67]. Knief, C. (2015). Diversity and habitat
inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root- preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic
induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil, 237, methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as
(2), 173–195. molecular marker. Front Microbiol., 6:1346
[55]. Huygens, D., Boeckx, P., Templer, P., Paulino L., [68]. Kuzyakov, Y., Subbotina, I., Chen, H.,
Van Cleemput O., Oyarzun C., Muller C., & Godoy, R. Bogomolova, I., & Xu, X. (2009). Black carbon
(2008). Mechanisms for retention of bioavailable decomposition and incorporation into soil microbial
nitrogen in volcanic rainforest soils. Nat Geosci, 1: biomass estimated by 14C labeling. Soil BiolBiochem,
543–548. 41: 210–219.
[56]. Igalavithana, A. D., Ok, Y. S., Usman, A. R. A., [69]. Laghari, M., Mirjat, M.S., Hu, Z., Fazal, S., Xiao,
Al-Wabel, M. I., Oleszczuk, P., & Lee, S. S. (2016). B., Hu, M., Chen, Z. & Guo, D. (2015). Effects of
The effects of biochar amendment on soil fertility. In: biochar application rate on sandy desert soil properties
M. Guo, Z. He, and S. M. Uchimiya (Eds.), and sorghum growth. Catena, 135, 313–320.
Agricultural and environmental applications of biochar: [71]. Laghari, M.; Naidu, R.; Xiao, B.; Hu, Z.; Mirjat,
Advances and barriers (pp. 123–144). Madison, WI: M. S.; Hu, M.; Kandhro, M. N.; Chen, Z.; & Fazal, S.
Soil Science Society of America, Inc. (2016). Recent developments in biochar as an effective
[57]. IPCC., (2007). The physical science basis. tool for agricultural soil management: a review. Journal
Contribution of working group I. In: Solomon, S., Qin, of the science of food and agriculture, 96, 4840–4849.
D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., [72]. Laird, D.A. (2008). The charcoal vision: a win–
Tignor, M., Miller, H.L. (Eds.), The Fourth Assessment win–win scenario for simultaneously producing
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while
Change (Cambridge, United Kingdom). improving soil and water quality. Agron J., 100(1):178–
[58]. Jeffery, S.; Verheijen, F. G. A.; van der Velde, 181.
M.; & Bastos, A. C. (2011). A quantitative review of [73]. Lehmann J., Gaunt J., & Rondon M. (2006). Bio-
the effects of biochar application to soils on crop char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—a review.
productivity using meta analysis. Agriculture, Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang, 11: 395–419.
Ecosystems and Environment, 144, 175–187. [74]. Lehmann, J. & Joseph, S. (2009). Biochar for
[59]. Jien, S. H. & Wang, C. S. (2013). Effects of environmental management: An introduction in Biochar
biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a for Environmental Management Science and
highly weathered soil. Catena, 110, 225– 233. Technology (eds Lehmann, J. & Joseph, S) (Earthscan).
[60]. Jin, H., (2010). Characterization of Microbial Life [75]. Lehmann, J. and S. Joseph (2015). Biochar for
Colonizing Biochar and Biochar- amended Soils. environmental management: Science, Technology and
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (PhD Dissertation). Implementation. Earthscan, London: pp.1-12.
[61]. Jones, D. L., Murphy, D. V., Khalid, M., Ahmad, [78]. Lehmann, J., Rondon, M., (2006). Bio-char soil
W., Edwards-Jones, G., & DeLuca T.H. (2011). Short- management on highly weathered soils in the humid
term biochar-induced increase in soil CO2 release is tropics. In: BiologicalApproaches to Sustainable Soil
both biotically and abiotically mediated. Soil Systems. CRC Press, pp. 517–529.
BiolBiochem 43(8):1723–1731. [79]. Lehmann, J.; Kuzyakov, Y.; Pan, G.; & Ok, Y. S.
[62]. Joseph, S. D., Camps-Arbestain, M., Lin, Y., (2015). Biochars and the plant-soil interface. Plant and
Munroe, P., Chia, C.H., Hook, J., Van, Zwieten, L., Soil, 395, 1–5.
Kimber, S., Cowie, A, Singh, B.P., & Lehmann, J. [80]. Lehmann, J.; Rillig, M. C.; Thies, J.; Masiello, C.
(2010). An investigation into the reactions of biochar in A.; Hockaday, W. C.; & Crowley, D. (2011). Biochar
soil. Soil Res., 48(7): 501–515. effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biology and
[63]. Kan, T.; Strezov, V.; Evans, T. J. (2016). Biochemistry, 43: 1812–1836.
Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: A review of product [81]. Leng, L., & Huang, H., (2018). An overview of
properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 1126– stability. Bioresour. Technol., 270, 627–642.
1140. [83]. Liang, B., Lehmann, J., Sohi, S.P., Theis, J.E.,
O’Neill, B., Trujillo, L., Gaunt, J., Solomon, D.,
Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 37
Grossman, J., Neves, E.G., & Luizão, F.J., (2010). [101]. Pratscher, J., Dumont M. G., & Conrad, R.
Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in (2011). Ammonia oxidation coupled to CO 2 fixation by
soil. Org. Geochem. 41 (2), 206–213. archaea and bacteria in an agricultural soil. Proc Natl
[84]. Lichtfouse, E.; Navarrete, M.; Debaeke, P.; Acad Sci., 108(10): 4170–4175.
Souchere, V.; Alberola, C.; & Menassieu, J. (2009). [102]. Rabileh, M. A.; Shamshuddin, J.; Panhwar, Q.
Agronomy for sustainable agriculture: a review. A.; Rosenani, A. B., & Anuar, A. R. (2015). Effects of
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 1–6. biochar and/or dolomitic limestone application on the
[86]. Liu, C., Wang, H., Tang, X., Guan, Z., Reid, B.J., properties of Utisol cropped to maize under glasshouse
Rajapaksha, A.U., Ok, Y.S., & Sun, H., (2016). Biochar conditions. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 95(1), 1–
increased water holding capacity but accelerated 11.
organic carbon leaching from a sloping farmland soil in [103]. Reddy, K.R., Xie, T., Dastgheibi, S. (2014b).
China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Evaluation of biochar as a potential filter media for the
23, 995–1006. removal of mixed contaminants from urban storm water
[87]. Liu, X.; Zhang, A.; Ji, C.; Joseph, S.; Bian, R.; Li, runoff. J. Environ. Eng., 140(12):04014043
L.; Pan, G.; and Paz-Ferreiro, J. (2013). Biochar’s [104]. Reddy, K.R., Yargicoglu, E,N., Yue, D., &
effect on crop productivity and the dependence on Yaghoubi, P. (2014a). Enhanced microbial methane
experimental conditions- a meta-analysis of literature oxidation in landfill cover soil amended with biochar. J.
data. Plant Soil, 373, 583–594. Geotech Geoenviron., 140(9): 04014047
[90]. Major, J., Lehmann, J., Rondon, M., & Goodale, [105]. Ro, K. S.; Cantrell, K. B.; & Hunt, P. G. (2010).
C., (2010). Fate of soil-applied black carbon: downward High-temperature pyrolysis of blended animal manures
migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change for producing renewable energy and value-added
Biology, 16, 1366–1379. biochar. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,
[91]. Mia, S.; van Groenigen, J. W.; van de Voorde, T. 49, 10125–10131.
F. J.; Oram, N. J.; Bezemer, T. M.; Mommer, L.; & [106]. Rogovska, N., D.A. Laird, and D.L. Karlen
Jeffery, S. (2014). Biochar application rate affects (2016). Corn and soil response to biochar application
biological nitrogen fixation in red clover conditional on and stover harvest. Field Crops Res., 187: 96–106.
potassium availability. Agriculture, Ecosystems & [107]. Rondon, M., Ramirez J.A.,& Lehmann, J.
Environment, 191, 83–91. (2005). Charcoal additions reduce net emissions of
[92]. Mosier AR, Duxbury J.M., Freney J.R., greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. In: Proceedings of
Heinemeyer O., & Minami K. (1998). Assessing and the 3rd USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases and
mitigating N2O emissions from agricultural soils. Clim Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry,
Chang 40: 7–38. Baltimore, MD. 21–24 Mar, University of Delaware,
[94]. Muscolo, A.; Sidari, M.; & Nardi, S. (2013). USA, 208.
Humic substance: relationship between structure and [108]. Rondon, M.A., Lehmann, J., Ramírez, J., &
activity. deeper information suggests univocal findings. Hurtado, M., (2007). Biological nitrogen fixation by
Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 129, 57–63. common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) increases with
[95]. Nguyen B.T., & Lehmann J. (2009). Black carbon bio-char additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43,
decomposition under varying water regimes. Org 699–708.
Geochem, 40: 846–853 [109]. Rubasinghege, G., Spak, S.N., Stanier, C.O.,
[96]. Nguyen, B.T., Lehmann, J., Hockaday, W.C., Carmichael, G.R., Grassian, V.H. (2011). Abiotic
Joseph, S., & Masiello, C.A., (2010). Temperature mechanism for the formation of atmospheric nitrous
sensitivity of black carbon decomposition and oxide from ammonium nitrate. Environ SciTechnol
oxidation. Environmental Science & Technology 44, 45:2691–2697.
3324–3331. [110]. Sadeghi S.H.R., Hazbavi Z., & Kiani Harchegani
[97]. Cely, P. Tarquis A., Paz-Ferreiro, J. A. Méndez M. (2016). Controlling of runoff and soil loss from
and G. Gascó, (2014). Factors driving the carbon small plots treated by vinasse-produced biochar. Sci
mineralization priming effect in a sandy loam soil Total Environ 15:483–490.
amended with different types of biochar. Solid Earth, 5, [111]. Samarkin, V.A., Madigan, M.T., Bowles, M.W.,
1, p. 585–594. Casciotti, K.L,, Priscu, J.C., McKay, C.P., & Joye S.B.
[98]. Paneque, M., José, M., Franco-Navarro, J.D., (2010). Abiotic nitrous oxide emission from the
Colmenero-Flores, J.M., & Knicker, H. (2016). Effect hypersaline Don Juan Pond in Antarctica. Nat. Geosci.,
of biochar amendment on morphology, productivity and 3: 341–344.
water relations of sunflower plants under non-irrigation [111]. Schimmelpfennig S, Müller C, Grünhage L,
conditions. Catena, 147: 280–287. Koch C, Kammann C. (2014). Biochar, hydrochar and
[99]. Paustian, K.; Lehmann, J.; Ogle.; Reay, D.; uncarbonized feedstock application to permanent
Robertson, G. P.; & Smith, P. (2016). Climate-smart grassland - effects on greenhouse gas emissions and
soils. Nature, 532, 49–57. plant growth. Agriculture, Ecosystems and
[100]. Paz Ferreiro, J.; Plasencia, P.; Gascó, G.; & Environment, 191: 39–52.
Méndez; A. (2017). Biochar from pyrolysis of deinking [112]. Scott A.C., & Glasspool I.J. (2007).
paper sludge and its use in the remediation of Zn Observations and experiments on the origin and
polluted soils. Land Degradation & Development, 28, formation of inertinite group macerals. Int. J. Coal
355–360. Geol., 70: 53–66

Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 38
[113]. Sigua, G. C.; Novak, J. M.; Watts, D. W.; [127]. Steiner, C., Teixeira, W., Lehmann, J., Nehls, T.,
Johnson, M. G.; & Spokas, K. (2015). Efficacies of de Macêdo, J., Blum, W., & Zech, W. (2007). Long
designer biochars in improving biomass and nutrient term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral
uptake of winter wheat grown in a hard setting subsoil fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly
layer. Chemosphere, 142, 176–183. weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil,
[114]. Singh, B.P., Hatton, B.J., Singh, B., Cowie, A.L., 291: 275–290
& Kathuria, A. (2010). Influence of biochars on nitrous [128]. Steiner, C.; Glaser, B.; Teixeira, W. G.;
oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two Lehmann, J.; Blum, W. E. H.; & Zech, W. (2008).
contrasting soils. J. Environ. Qual., 39:1224–1235. Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly
[115]. Slavich, P. G.; Sinclair, K.; Morris, S. G.; weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with
Kimber, S. W. L.; Downie, A.; & Van Zwieten, L. compost and charcoal. Journal of Plant Nutrition and
(2013). Contrasting effects of manure and green waste Soil Science, 171, 893–899.
biochars on the properties of an acidic ferralsol and [129]. Suddick, E. C., & Six, J. (2013). An estimation
productivity of a subtropical pasture. Plant Soil, 366, of annual nitrous oxide emissions and soil quality
213–227. following the amendment of high temperature walnut
[116]. Smith, P. (2016). Soil carbon sequestration and shell biochar and compost to a small scale vegetable
biochar as negative emission technologies. Global crop rotation. Science of the Total Environment, 465,
Change Biology, 22, 1315–1324. 298–307.
[117]. Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., [130]. Suliman, W., Harsh, J. B., Abu Lail, N. I.,
Janzen, H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O’Mara, Fortuna, A. M., Dallmeyer, I., & Garcia Perez, M.
F., Rice, C., Scholes, B., & Sirotenko, O., (2007). (2016). Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis
Agriculture, in: climate change 2007: mitigation. temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties.
Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Biomass and Bioenergy, 84, 37–48.
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on [131]. Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Clough, T.J., Condron
Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, pp. L.M., Sherlock R.R., Anderson C.R., & Craigie R.A.
497540. (2011). Biochar incorporation into pasture soil
[119]. Smith, P.; Martino, D.; Cai, Z.; Gwary, D.; suppresses in situ nitrous oxide emissions from
Janzen, H.; Kumar, P.; McCarl, B.; Ogle, S.; O’Mara, ruminant urine patches. Journal of Environmental
F.; Rice, C.; Scholes, B.; Sirotenko, O.; Howden, M.; Quality, 40, 468–476.
McAllister, T.; Pan, G.; Romanenkov, V.; Schneider, [132]. Teoh, R., E. Caro, D. B. Holman, S. Joseph, S. J.
U.; Towprayoon, S.; Wattenbach, M.; & Smith, J. Meale, and A. V. Chaves. (2019). Effects of Hardwood
(2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Biochar on Methane Production, Fermentation
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Characteristics, and the Rumen Microbiota Using
Biology Science, 363, 789–813. Rumen Simulation. Front. Microbiol., 10:1534-1534.
[120]. Sohi, S., Lopez-capel, E., Krull, E., & Bol, R., [133]. Thomson AJ, Giannopoulos G, Pretty J, Baggs
(2009). Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to E.M., & Richardson D.J. (2012). Biological sources and
guide future research. CSIRO Land and Water's sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate
Science, 5, 17–31. emissions. Philos Trans R SocLond B: Biol Sci., 367:
[121]. Solaiman, Z.M., Murphy, D.V., & Abbott, L.K., 1157–1168.
(2012). Biochars influence seed germination and early [134]. United Nations, (2013). World Population
growth of seedlings. Plant and Soil, 353, 273–287. Prospects: The 2012 Revision [WWW Document]
[122]. Spokas, K.A., Koskinen, W.C., Baker, J.M., & Prospect. 2012 Revis.
Reicosky, D.C. (2009). Impacts of woodchip biochar [136]. Van Zwieten, L., Kimber, S., Morris, S., Chan,
additions on greenhouse gas production and K., Downie, A., Rust, J., Joseph, S., & Cowie, A.
sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota (2010a) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of
soil. Chemosphere 77: 574–581. papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil
[123]. Spokas, K. A. (2010). Review of the stability of fertility. Plant Soil, 327: 235–246.
biochar in soils: Predictability of O:C molar ratios. [137]. Verheijen, F. G. A.; Graber, E. R.; Ameloot, N.;
Carbon Management, 1, 289–303. Bastos, A. C.; Sohi, S.; & Knicker, H. (2014). Biochars
[124]. Spokas, K.A., Cantrell, K.B., Novak, J.M., in soils: new insights and emerging research needs.
Archer, D.W., Ippolito, J.A., Collins, H.P., Boateng, European Journal of Soil Science, 65, 22–27.
A.A., Lima, I.M., Lamb, M.C., McAloon, A.J., Lentz, [138]. Verheijen, F.G.A., Jefferey, S., Bastos, A.C., van
R.D., & Nichols, K.A., (2012). Biochar: a synthesis of der Velde, M. & Diafas, I. (2010). Biochar Application
its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. to Soils – A Critical Scientific Review of Effects on
Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, 973–989. Soil Properties, Processes and Functions. EUR 24099
[125]. Stavi, I.; & Lal, R. (2013). Agroforestry and EN. Office for the Official Publications of the European
biochar to offset climate change: a review. Agronomy Communities, Luxembourg.
for Sustainable Development, 33, 81–96. [139]. Wang, J., Zhang, M., Xiong, Z., Liu, P., & Pan,
[126]. Steiner C, Das CK, Melear N, & Lakly D. G. (2011). Effects of biochar addition on N2O and CO2
(2010). Reducing nitrogen loss during poultry litter emissions from two paddy soils. BiolFert Soils, 47:
composting using biochar. J. Environ. Qual., 39: 1236– 887–896
1242.

Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 39
 [140]. Wang, X., Cui, H., Shi, J., Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., & http://hdl.handle.net/2142/25503
Wei, Z. (2015). Relationship between bacterial [154]. Zhu, X.; Chen, B.; Zhu, L.; & Xing, B. (2017).
diversity Effects and mechanisms of biochar microbe interactions
[141]. Wang, L.; Butterfly, C. R.; Wang, Y.; Herath, in soil improvement and pollution remediation: A
H.; Xi, Y. G.; Xiao, X. J. (2014). Effect of crop residue review. Environmental Pollution, 227, 98–115.
biochar on soil acidity ameliorationin strongly acidic [155]. Zimmerman AR, Gao B, Ahn M-Y (2011).
tea garden soils. Soil Use and Management, 30, 119– Positive and negative carbon mineralization priming
128. effects among a variety of biochar-amended soils. Soil
[142]. Wardle, D. A., Nilsson, M. C., & Zackrisson, O. BiolBiochem., 43: 1169–1179.
(2008). Fire derived charcoal causes loss of forest [156]. Zornoza, R.; Moreno Barriga, F.; Acosta, J. A.;
humus. Science, 320, 629–629. Muñoz, M. A.; & Faz, A. (2016). Stability, nutrient
[144]. Whitman, T., & Lehmann, J., (2009). Biochar- availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived
One way forward for soil carbon in offset mechanisms from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste
in Africa? Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 1024– for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere, 144,
1027. 122–130.
[145]. Woolf, D., and J. Lehmann. (2012). Modelling [157]. Cross, A., & Sohi S.P. (2011). The priming
the Long-Term Response to Positive and Negative potential of biochar products in relation to labile carbon
Priming of Soil Organic Carbon by Black Carbon. contents and soil organic matter status. Soil Biology
Biogeochemistry, 111 (1–3): 83–95. and Biochemistry, 43, 2127–2134.
[146]. Xiao, Q., Zhu, L.X., Shen, Y.F., & Li, S.Q. [158]. Ogawa, M., and Y. Okimori. (2010). Pioneering
(2016). Sensitivity of soil water retention and works in biochar research: Japan. Soil Res., 48:489–
availability to biochar addition in rainfed semi-arid 500. doi:10.1071/SR10006.
farmland during a three-year field experiment. Field [159]. Jaiswal, S., Fontanillas, P., & Flannick, J.,
Crops Res., 196: 284–293. (2014). Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated
[147]. Yanai, Y., Toyota, K., & Okazaki, M. (2007). with adverse outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med., 371: 2488-
Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil 2498.
resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term [160]. Collins, H. (2008). Use of biochar from the
laboratory experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr., 53: 181– pyrolysis of waste organic material as a soil
188 amendment: laboratory and greenhouse analyses. A
[148]. Yao, Y.; Gao, B.; Inyang, M.; Zimmerman, A. quarterly progress report prepared for the biochar
R.; Cao, X. D.; Pullammanappallil, P.; & Yang, L. project.
(2011). Biochar derived from anaerobically digested [161]. Liang, B., Lehmann J., & Solomon, D. (2006).
sugar beet tailings: Characterization and phosphate Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in
removal potential. Bioresource Technology, 102, 6273– soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70: 1719–1730.
6278. [162]. Biederman, L.A.; & Harpole, W.S. (2013).
[149]. Zhang, A., Cui, L., Pan, G., Li, L., Hussain, Q., Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and
Zhang, X., Zheng, J., & Crowley, D. (2010). Effect of nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol.
biochar amendment on yield and methane and nitrous Bioenergy, 5, 202–214.
oxide emissions from a rice paddy from Tai Lake plain, [163]. Mau, A. E., and S. R. Utami, (2014). Effects of
China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 139: biochar amendment and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
469–475. inoculation on availability of soil phosphorus and
[150]. Zhang, X., Xia, J., Pu, J., Cai, C., Tyson, G. W., growth of maize. J. Degraded Min. Lands Manag., 1,
Yuan, Z., & amp; Hu, S. (2019). Biochar-Mediated 69–74.
Anaerobic Oxidation of Methane. Environmental [164]. Haefele, M., Konboon, Y., Wongboon, W.,
Science &amp; Technology, 53(12), 6660-6668. Amarante, S., Maarifat, A., Pfeiffer, M., & Knoblauch,
[151]. Zhao, L.; Cao, X.; Masek, O.; & Zimmerman, A. C. (2011). Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues
(2013). Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a in rice-based systems. Field Crops Research, 121, 430–
function of feedstock sources and production 440.
temperatures. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 256– [165]. Deenik, J., Diarra, A., Uehara, G., Campbell, S.,
257:1–9. Samiyoshi, Y., & Antal, M. J. (2011). Charcoal ash and
[152]. Zheng J, Stewart C.E., Cotrufo M.F. (2012). volatile matter effects on soil properties and plant
Biochar and nitrogen fertiliser alters soil nitrogen growth in an acid ultisol. Soil Science, 176, 336–345.
dynamics and greenhouse gas fluxes from two [166]. Bouwman, L., Goldewijk, K.K., & Van Der
temperate soils. Journal of Environmental Quality Hoek K.W. (2013). Exploring global changes in
41(5): 1361–1370. nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced
[153]. Zheng, W., Sharma, B. K., & Rajagopalan, N. by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period.
(2010). Using biochar as a soil amendment for Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
sustainable agriculture. Illinois department of the USA, 110, 20882–20887.
agriculture sustainable agriculture grant’s research [167]. FAO. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organisation
report series. Illinois sustainable technology center. of the United Nations. Statistics Database (FAOSTAT).
University of Illinois. Retrieved from URL: http://faostat.fao.org. Date accessed.

Dar et al., International Journal of Theoretical & Applied Sciences, 11(2): 29-40(2019) 40

View publication stats