Taylor Series in Beam Deflection
Taylor Series in Beam Deflection
A New Method for the Analysis of Beam’s Deflection Using the Taylor Series
Expansion
Farzad Fariba
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, Iran
Keywords: Abstract
Beam’s deflection, Deflection and rotation of beams can be determined by various methods available in the
Taylor series, literature. In this investigation, a new method based on the Taylor series expansion
Bending moment, called "Taylor method" is introduced. The method yields two single equations for
Shear force calculation of deflection and the rotation of the beam regardless of the loading and
supports conditions. The method employs the governing differential equations for
deflection of beams in mechanics of solids along with Taylor series expansion. The
equations of shear force and bending moment can be determined using Taylor series
and without resorting to their corresponding diagrams. The method is examined by
solving a number of beam problems. The results indicate that the method can be used
with confidence for solving any problemrelated to the beam’s deflection. The method
also seems to be more convenient and more efficient than the other methods.
1. Introduction
Deflection and rotation ofbeams can be determined by various approaches some of which are
direct integration method, moment-area approach, energy method which includes Castigliano's
theorems and unit load technique, stiffness and flexibility methods, superposition principal, three
bending moments technique and singularity functions method [1-3].
Some of the methods such as integration and singularity functions lead to equations which
describe deflection and rotation throughout the length of the beam. However, these methods are
sometimes cumbersome for the beams with multiple supports, spans and combined loadings. The
other approaches such as moment-area, flexibility, stiffness, energy and three moment techniques
can predict the deflection and rotation only at specified points. Moreover, except for the singularity
functions, deflection and rotation are defined by various equations for beams with multiple supports
and combined loadings. Also, Singularity functions are not very popular as they need symbolic
mathematical expressions for discontinuous functions of load, shear and moment along a beam.
Corresponding Author:
E-mail, [email protected] – Tel, (+98) 9183151993
Received: 14 September 2015; Accepted: 21 October 2015
Farzad Fariba - Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 01(04), 126-133, November 2015
In this investigation, a new method based on the Taylor series expansion is developed for the
evaluation of beam’s deflection and rotation. The method utilizes the elementary equations found
normally in the books of solid mechanics. The validity of the method is also examined by solving a
number of problems.
(𝑥−𝑎)𝑦 (1) (𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)2 𝑦 (2) (𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)3 𝑦 (3) (𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)𝑛 𝑦 (𝑛) (𝑎)
𝑦(𝑥) = 𝑦(𝑎) + + + + ⋯+ (1)
1! 2! 3! 𝑛!
in which 𝑦 (𝑛) (𝑎) is the nthderivative of the function y(x) at x=a. The expansion at point x=0,
known as Maclaurin expansion series, becomes
Taylor and Maclaurin expansions are widely used in solving differential equations and for
calculation of the function at a specified point in terms of a finite number of its derivatives.
𝑑𝑦(𝑥)
𝜃(𝑥) = 𝑑𝑥
= 𝑦 (1) (𝑥) (3)
𝑀(𝑥) = 𝐸𝐼𝑦 (2) (𝑥) (4)
𝑉(𝑥) = 𝐸𝐼𝑦 (3) (𝑥) (5)
𝑞(𝑥) = 𝐸𝐼𝑦 (4) (𝑥) (6)
Eqs. (4) to (6) are derived in accordance with the sign conventions for positive bending
moment, shear force and the distributed load as shown in Figure 1.
127
Farzad Fariba - Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 01(04), 126-133, November 2015
Figure 1. The sign conventions used for the positive bending moment, shear force and distributed load
In Eqs. (3) to (6), 𝑞(𝑥), 𝑀(𝑥), 𝑉(𝑥) and 𝜃(𝑥) denote the distributed load, bending moment, shear
force and rotation of the beam at any arbitrary section of the beam, respectively. The signs of the
loads must conform to the Cartesian coordinate system as illustrated in Figure 1. Substituting Eqs.
(3) to (6) into Eqs. (1) and (2), results in
(𝑥−𝑎)𝜃(𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)2 𝑀(𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)3 𝑉(𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)4 𝑞(𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)5 𝑞′(𝑎) (𝑥−𝑎)6 𝑞′′(𝑎)
𝑦(𝑥) = 𝑦(𝑎) + 1!
+ 2!𝐸𝐼
+ 3!𝐸𝐼
+ 4!𝐸𝐼
+ 5!𝐸𝐼
+ 6!𝐸𝐼
+⋯ (7)
𝑥𝜃(0) 𝑥 2 𝑀(0) 𝑥 3 𝑉(0) 𝑥 4 𝑞(0) 𝑥 5 𝑞′(0) 𝑥 6 𝑞′′(0)
𝑦(𝑥) = 𝑦(0) + 1!
+ 2!𝐸𝐼
+ 3!𝐸𝐼
+ 4!𝐸𝐼
+ 5!𝐸𝐼
+ 6!𝐸𝐼
+ ⋯ (8)
Eq. (8) is usually referred to as the elastic curve of the beam. Here, prime denotes the derivative
with respect to 𝑥 . If the left end of the beam is selected as the origin of the x axis, then the value of
𝑞(0), 𝑀(0), 𝑉(0) and 𝜃(0) will denote the distributed load, bending moment, shear force and the
rotation of the beam at the left end, respectively. It is evident that the origin of the coordinate
system can be set at any arbitrary point. However, the left end of the beam can be more convenient
and will simplify the computations. It is interesting to note that the number of terms in Taylor series
given by Eqs. (7) and (8) is finite. For instance, in the case of uniformly distributed loads, the
derivatives 𝑞′(0), 𝑞′′(0),.... are zero, while for a linear distributed load, 𝑞′′(0), .... are zero.
Another feature of the method described in this paper is that the rotation, bending moment and
shear force at any section of the beam can be obtained using the Taylor series expansion (Eq.(2))
along with Eqs. (3) to (6). This will enable us to determine the distribution of bending moment and
shear force in the beam without resorting to sectioning technique and integration which are
sometimes, in particular for complex loadings and multiple supports, cumbersome. From Eq. (8)
and using Eqs. (3) to (5), the following relations are derived
128
Farzad Fariba - Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 01(04), 126-133, November 2015
4. Method Validation
In this section, the validity of the method is examined by solving a number of statistically
determinate and indeterminate beams of different loading conditions and supports.
This equation describes the deflection along the beam regardless of the type of loading which
can be concentrated force, distributed or bending moment. For a uniformly distributed loadwe can
write
From equilibrium equations, the reactions at the support of the beam are determined as
𝜔0 𝐿2
𝑉(0) = 𝜔0 𝐿 , 𝑀(0) = − , 𝑞(0) = −𝜔0 (14)
2
Substituting the above values into Eq. (13), the equation of the elastic curve of the beam and the
maximum deflection are derived as
129
Farzad Fariba - Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 01(04), 126-133, November 2015
−𝑥 2 𝜔0 𝐿2 𝑥 3 𝜔0 𝐿 𝑥 4 𝜔0
𝑦(𝑥) = 4𝐸𝐼
+ 6𝐸𝐼
− 24𝐸𝐼
(15)
𝜔0 𝑥 2
𝑦(𝑥) = (−6𝐿2 + 4𝑥𝐿 − 𝑥 2 ) (16)
24𝐸𝐼
−𝜔0 𝐿4
𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐿) = 𝑦𝑀𝑎𝑥 = 8𝐸𝐼
(17)
For a concentrated load applied at the free end of the beam as depicted in Figure 3, Eq. (13)
reduces even more as follows
𝑥 2 𝑀(0) 𝑥 3 𝑉(0)
𝑦(𝑥) = 2𝐸𝐼
+ 6𝐸𝐼
(18)
Figure 3. (a) A cantilever under a concentrated load and (b) the free body diagram of the beam
In the above equation, 𝑉(0) and 𝑀(0) are the shear force and bending moment, respectively,
which can be determined from force and moment equilibrium equations given as below
Substituting these values into Eq. (18), equation of the elastic curve of the beam and the
maximum deflection are determined as follows
𝑃𝐿𝑥 2 𝑃𝑥 3
𝑦(𝑥) = − 2𝐸𝐼
+ 6𝐸𝐼 (20)
𝑃𝑥 2
𝑦(𝑥) = − 6𝐸𝐼 (3𝐿 − 𝑥) (21)
𝑦𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐿) = −𝑃𝐿3 /3𝐸𝐼 (22)
For a simply supported beam under a point load applied at the center of the beam, we
have 𝑞 ′ (0) = 𝑞 ′′ (0) = ⋯ = 0. So, Eq. (23) will be reduced to
𝑥 3 𝑉(0)
𝑦(𝑥) = 𝑥𝜃(0) + 6𝐸𝐼
𝐿/2 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0 (24)
Figure 5. A simply supported beam under a point load applied at its center
The value of the shear force at the left support is obtained from equilibrium equation as 𝑉(0) =
𝑃/2. By differentiating Eq. (24) with respect to x, the rotation of the beam can be determined as
𝑃𝑥 2
𝜃(𝑥) = 𝜃(0) + (25)
4𝐸𝐼
Since, the value of the rotation is zero at the point of load application, the value of the rotation
at the left support can be obtained by using Eq. (25) as
𝐿 𝑃𝐿2 𝑃𝐿2
𝜃 (𝑥 = 2) = 𝜃(0) + 16𝐸𝐼 = 0 ⇒ 𝜃(0) = − 16𝐸𝐼 (26)
Substituting the value of 𝜃(0)and 𝑉(0) into Eq. (25), equation of the elastic curve of the beam
and the maximum deflection are determined as
−𝑃𝑥
𝑦(𝑥) = 48𝐸𝐼 (3𝐿2 − 4𝑥 2 )𝐿/2 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0 (27)
131
Farzad Fariba - Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 01(04), 126-133, November 2015
It should be noted that Eq. (27) holds only for the region of the beam located on the left hand
side of the load, , 0 x L . If x is replaced by 𝐿 − 𝑥, then the equation of deflection for the right
hand side of the load is obtained.
The shear force and bending moment at the free end and also the distributed load and its
derivatives at any point can be written as
𝑥 𝜔0
𝑉(0) = 0, 𝑀(0) = 0, 𝑞(𝑥) = 𝜔0 ( ) , 𝑞 ′ (𝑥) = (29)
𝐿 𝐿
0 𝑥5𝜔
𝑦(𝑥) = 𝑦(0) + 𝑥𝜃(0) + 120𝐸𝐼𝐿 (30)
𝑥4𝜔
𝜃(𝑥) = 𝜃(0) + 24𝐸𝐼𝐿0 (31)
Using the boundary conditions𝜃(𝐿) = 0 and 𝑦 (𝐿) = 0, the values of deflection and rotation at
𝑥 = 0 can be computed from Eqs. (30) and (31) as follows
0 𝜔 𝐿3
𝜃(𝐿) = 0 ⇒ 𝜃(0) = − 24𝐸𝐼 (32)
𝜔0 𝐿4
𝑦(𝐿) = 0 ⇒ 𝑦(0) = (33)
30𝐸𝐼
Substituting the above relations into Eq. (22), the relation for deflection of the beam can be
obtained as
132
Farzad Fariba - Comput. Res. Prog. Appl. Sci. Eng. Vol. 01(04), 126-133, November 2015
𝜔0
𝑦(𝑥) = 120𝐸𝐼 (4𝐿2 − 5𝑥𝐿4 + 𝑥 5 ) (34)
5. Conclusions
The new method developed in this work for bending analysis of beamswas validated by a
number of relative problems which are of more interesting in the mechanics of solids. The authors
of this work would like to call this approach as "Taylor method". The method has the following
advantages:
a) Similar to integration and singularity functions methods and unlike the methods such as energy
and moment area, Taylor method provides general equations for describing deflection and the
rotation of the beam.
b) Fewer computations and mathematical operations are required for deriving the deflection and the
rotation equations of the beam, as it is needed in integration method.
c) Beams of multiple spans, supports and complex loading can be analyzed by this method.
d) The method enables the user to determine the equations of shear force and bending moment
without resorting to their corresponding diagrams.
e) The beam equations can be easily obtained in each segment of the beam by writing Taylor series
expansion at the beginning of that segment. On the whole, Taylor method enjoys nearly the
advantages of all methods available in the literature on one hand and lacks the shortcomings of
those methods on the other hand. Therefore, to the best of author's belief, Taylor method can be
regarded as one of the most comprehensive methods for beam analysis.
References
[2] Popov, E.P.: Engineering Mechanics of Solids, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, (1990).
[3] Gere J.M., Timoshenko, S. P.:Mechanics of Materials, PWS Publishing Co., Boston,(1997).
133