Electrical_Lecture_3
Electrical_Lecture_3
All resistivity methods use an artificial source of current. Current is passed into the
ground with a pair of metallic electrode and resulting potential difference is measured
with another pair of electrodes. Either potential difference and current is measured
individually by the instrument, or it directly gives the apparent resistance, which is
converted into apparent resistivity. The computed apparent resistivity (data) is
interpreted in terms of actual resistivity distribution in the subsurface, both in vertical
and lateral directions. Interpreted actual resistivity is then correlated with local
geology to arrive at meaningful geological interpretation having economic importance.
Resistivity method is superior than other electrical methods (SP, IP, etc) because good
quantitative results can be obtained with this method.
The drawback of the resistivity methods is its sensitivity of minor variation of electrical
conductivity in the near surface. Presence of small conducting objects, power line
cable, utility lines severally affects the electrical resistivity observations.
Further depth of penetration depends on distance between current electrodes, thus
dragging long cables in the field is often problematic and requires appropriate
personal to handle long cables.
න 𝐽 . 𝑑𝐴 = 0
𝐴
Gauss theorem states that volume integral of the divergence of current density
throughout a given region is equal to the total charge enclosed by the surface
න (∇. 𝐽) 𝑑𝑣 = න 𝐽. 𝑑𝐴 = 0
𝑉 𝐴
∇. 𝐽 = −∇. 𝜎∇𝑉 = 0
∇𝜎∇𝑉 + 𝜎∇2 𝑉 = 0
∇2 𝑉 = 0
This is Laplace equation and states that electrical potential satisfy Laplace
equation and hence it is harmonic in nature and can have positive and negative
values.
Boundary conditions
𝐽1𝑛 = 𝐽2𝑛
𝜕𝑉 𝜕𝑉
𝜎1 = 𝜎2
𝜕𝑧 1 𝜕𝑧 2
Potential due to a single current electrode placed at depth in a homogeneous
medium
Current flow will be radially outward from C1 and equipotential surface will be
spherical. Potential will follow spherical symmetry and from the symmetry of the
system, potential will be function of distance r from the current source. Thus
V(r,,)will reduce to V(r) only
1 𝜕 𝜕𝑉 1 𝜕 𝜕𝑉 1 𝜕 𝜕2 𝑉
∇2 𝑉 = 𝑟 2 𝜕𝑟 + 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜃 𝜕𝜃 + =0
𝑟 2 𝜕𝑟 𝑟 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃 𝜕𝜃 𝑟 2 𝑠𝑖𝑛2 𝜃 𝜕𝜃 𝜕𝜃 2
𝜕 𝜕𝑉
𝑟 2 𝜕𝑟 =0
𝜕𝑟
Integrating
𝑑𝑉
𝑟 2 𝑑𝑟 = A, where A is integration constant
𝑑𝑉 𝐴
=
𝑑𝑟 𝑟 2
Integrating again
𝐴
𝑉 𝑟 =− +𝐵
𝑟
Where B is another constant
𝑑𝑉
Now using 𝑟 2 𝑑𝑟 = A from previous relations
𝐼 = −𝜎. 4𝜋𝐴
𝜌𝐼
Or 𝐴 = −
4𝜋
𝜌𝐼 1
Or final solution for potential 𝑉(𝑟) =
2𝜋 𝑟
Potential difference due to a pair of current and potential electrodes
C1(+I) P1 P2 C2 (-I)
r1 r2
r3 r4
𝜌𝐼 1 𝜌𝐼 1
𝑉𝑃1 = −
2𝜋 𝑟1 2𝜋 𝑟2
𝜌𝐼 1 𝜌𝐼 1
𝑉𝑃2 = −
2𝜋 𝑟3 2𝜋 𝑟4
𝜌𝐼 1 𝜌𝐼 1 𝜌𝐼 1 𝜌𝐼 1
Potential difference 𝑉𝑃1 − 𝑉𝑃2 = ∆𝑉 = 2𝜋 𝑟 − 2𝜋 𝑟 - 2𝜋 𝑟3
+ 2𝜋 𝑟
1 2 4
𝜌𝐼 1 1 1 1
∆𝑉 = ( − - + )
2𝜋 𝑟1 𝑟2 𝑟3 𝑟4
2𝜋 ∆𝑉
𝜌=
1 1 1 1 𝐼
− − −
𝑟1 𝑟2 𝑟3 𝑟4