Scribd
Upload
8 views

Research Proposal Rubrics

Uploaded by

Ulfa Meisaroh Muthmainnah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
8 views

Research Proposal Rubrics

Uploaded by

Ulfa Meisaroh Muthmainnah
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

RESEARCH PROPOSAL RUBRICS

Title of the Study:


Researchers:

Research Adviser: Date of Completion:

Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Check the appropriate column (
5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest) indicating your evaluation.
INTRODUCTION
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory discussion of the problem ✓
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed in paragraph 1 ✓
3. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in the literature review. ✓
4. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the researchers and they only stated ✓
researches relevant to their study.
5. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main problem or the title of the study ✓
6. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and specifically stated in paragraph 3 to convince ✓
the readers of the need to conduct such study
7. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and skeletal framework of the study. ✓
8. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly presented. ✓
9. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has global impact in educational context as ✓
a whole.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the research problem. ✓
2. Related literature and studies are recent (five years ago to present year of the study) ✓
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are present. ✓
4. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, concise (not too long nor ✓
too short) and is based on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited materials.
5. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are appropriately acknowledged and or ✓
credited.
6. The researchers were able to determine the construct and variable of their study from the ✓
theory presented.
7. The framework presented conceptualizes the concepts of the theory appropriately. ✓

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD


Indicators 5 4 3 2 1
1. The research methodology is well-described and is suitable or fitting to the research problem. ✓
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of the sample profile, sample size ✓
and sampling technique and or procedure.
3. The research locale is described in terms of its location, historical background, purposes and ✓
objectives and or mission and vision of the instruction or organization
4. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are explained in complete detail beginning ✓
from the time the researches sought permission to conduct the study.
5. The research instrument is presented and discussed in terms of its validity and reliability (in ✓
case of self-made instrument)
6. The research design and method employed by the researchers are correct and relevant to the ✓
fulfillment of the accurate results of the study.
7. The statistical tool selected is appropriate to gather the needed data and answer the problem ✓
of the study.
8. The statistical tool is brief and accurately used to answer the queries or objectives of the ✓
study.
OVER-ALL TOTAL:
Remarks:
After reviewing the proposal as a whole, I found it to be generally well-written. However, the theoretical section should be
expanded and focused more on relevant research. Additionally, the conceptual framework needs to be made more detailed,
especially in the part being investigated. Finally, the methodology section should be explained in greater depth, with additional
materials to strengthen it, including reasons and implications based on expert theories, to provide a stronger foundation for the
research.
Signature over Printed Name
Name of Student: …………………….
Title : ……………………….

Supervisor’s suggestions:
No Aspects Suggestions
1 Background
2 Research questions
3 Significance of research
4 Conceptual framework
5 Hypothesis
6 Research design
7 Site and participants
8 Data Collection
9 Data Analysis
10 Previous study
11

Academic Supervisor

Signature
Name

You might also like