2007 Brekken Control of A Doubly Fed Induction Wind Generator Under Unbalanced Grid Voltage Conditions
2007 Brekken Control of A Doubly Fed Induction Wind Generator Under Unbalanced Grid Voltage Conditions
isd isd vsd
d isq isq vsq
= [A(ωd , ωdA )] + [B(ωd , ωdA )] .
dt ird ird vrd
irq irq vrq
(5)
From the linearized state equations (5), ird /vrd (s) and
Fig. 4. ird loop with disturbance rejection controller.
irq /vrq (s) are determined. Cird and Cirq are simple PI con-
trollers each designed for a 100-Hz loop gain crossover fre-
quency and 90◦ of phase margin. Doubly fed machines, natu- the power into the grid to change rapidly, mirroring the wind
rally, have a pair of poorly damped poles near the grid frequency. gusts. However, a slow speed loop will allow the generator
Fast inner current loops have a fast response time, but also tend to accelerate or decelerate as the wind changes, thus using the
to push the poorly damped system poles toward the right half rotational energy of the machine as a buffer to smooth the power
plane [5]. Slow loops are more stable, but the controllers must be into the grid [8].
fast enough to handle the rotor converter blanking time harmon-
ics, which occur at the slip frequency sixth harmonic [7]. A loop C. Design of CQs
gain bandwidth of 100 Hz is found to be a good compromise.
The reactive power outer loop is designed by relating stator
B. Design of Cωmech reactive power Qs to irq . It is, again, helpful to use the magne-
tizing current
The outer speed and reactive power loops were designed
in the standard cascade manner, having loop gain crossover Qs = vsq isd − vsd isq = −vsd (imq − nirq ). (12)
frequencies well below that of the inner current loops.
To design the speed controller, the ωmech /ird (s) transfer As explained earlier, the magnetizing current imq can be ap-
function must be determined. For this, it becomes useful to use proximated to be constant. Equation (13), then, follows:
the concept of magnetizing current to simplify the derivation of Qs
the plant transfer function (s) = nvsd . (13)
irq
isq + nirq = imq (6) A PI controller is used, and the loop gain bandwidth is designed
isd + nird = imd (7) for 1 Hz.
p
T = Lm n(isq ird − isd irq ) D. Design of Unbalance Compensation Controllers Cd,comp
2
p and Cq,comp
= Lm n(imq ird − imd irq ). (8)
2 The Cd,comp and Cq,comp controllers shown in Figs. 2 and 3,
The significant advantage of this form of the torque equation respectively, come into effect only in the presence of a stator-
is that the magnetizing currents imd and imq are predominantly voltage unbalance. They supplement the output of the nominal
determined by the stator side voltage, and therefore, can be ap- operation controllers Cird and Cirq to remove the 100 Hz dis-
proximated to be constant. The magnetizing current space vector turbance from the torque and reactive power. It is not enough to
will lag the stator-voltage space vector by nearly 90◦ . Since the simply increase the gain of Cird and Cirq . Removing the sec-
d-axis is chosen to be aligned with the stator-voltage space vec- ond harmonic from ird and irq will not completely remove the
tor, the majority of the magnetizing current space vector will second harmonic from the torque and reactive power, although
be reflected along the negative q-axis. Therefore, imq is large it can reduce it.
negative and imd is very small. Therefore, the torque can be The Cd,comp and Cq,comp controllers are designed to have a
approximated as having a proportional dependence on ird as large gain at the known disturbance frequency (twice the syn-
p chronous frequency, 100 Hz) but also to have a negligible effect
T ≈ Lm nimq ird (9) at all other frequencies. This is done by using a high-Q, second-
2
order resonant filter. The compensating controllers can be rep-
T p resented as having two components: a bandpass filter followed
(s) = Lm nimq . (10)
ird 2 by a lead-lag controller.
Therefore The natural frequency of the filter is the second harmonic
p (100 Hz) and the filter Q is set to some high value (e.g., 100).
ωmech Lm nimq
(s) = 2 . (11) Fig. 4 shows the inner loop of the d-axis with the Cd,comp
ird sJ + B controller. Fig. 5 shows the Cd,comp bode plot. Fig. 5 illustrates
A lead-lag controller is used, and the loop gain bandwidth that the function of the lead-lag filter is to push the phase up
is designed for 1 Hz. A fast speed loop will respond more such that the 180◦ of negative phase shift caused by the resonant
quickly to changes in the load, such as gusts of wind. This will filter does not push the loop gain phase margin below 0, and thus,
cause the generator torque to respond quickly, thereby causing cause instability.
132 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, VOL. 22, NO. 1, MARCH 2007
Fig. 10. DFIG stator current with 5% VUF. Fig. 12. DFIG rotor d- and q-axis voltage.
Fig. 13. DFIG torque second harmonic (100 Hz) magnitude as a function of
Fig. 11. DFIG stator, rotor, and total active power. stator-voltage unbalance.
The tradeoff is the extra power requirement of the rotor con- lated unbalance factors. In addition, unmodeled nonlinearities
verter. This is also shown in Fig. 12 as an increase in the rotor such as saturation, slot effects, and winding harmonics may play
voltage. a role [9].
The results show that the compensating controllers greatly
reduce the second harmonic torque pulsations, reactive power
B. Steady-State Analysis
pulsations, and stator-current unbalance.
The hardware results closely match the simulation results, In addition to transient analysis, a series of steady-state anal-
except in a few cases. The actual 100 Hz torque magnitude is yses with a swept stator-voltage unbalance are shown later. In
larger than that predicted by simulation. The torque shown for Figs. 13 and 14, the second harmonic magnitude of torque and
hardware results is calculated from measured currents. There- stator reactive power per unit is plotted versus stator-voltage
fore, noise and offset errors in the current measurements will unbalance. In Fig. 15, the stator-current unbalance is plotted
be present in the calculated torque. Also, the measured stator- versus stator-voltage unbalance. Both hardware and simulation
current unbalance is greater than that predicted by the simula- results are shown. By comparing the slope of the trend lines,
tion. Some of this error is likely due to offset errors in the current the effectiveness of the compensation controllers over a range
measurement. The unbalance calculation is sensitive, and even of stator-voltage unbalances can be determined, as shown in
small offset errors of 1% can have a large impact on the calcu- Table I.
134 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, VOL. 22, NO. 1, MARCH 2007
APPENDIX
15 kW Generator Parameters and Controller Gains
Rs = 0.19Ω, Rr = 0.08Ω
n = 0.74
p=4
Fig. 14. DFIG stator reactive power second harmonic (100 Hz) magnitude as
a function of stator-voltage unbalance. Lm = 71.2 mH
Lls = 1.2 mH, Llr = 1.0 mH
Ls = 72.4 mH, Lr = 39.9 mH
VLL,rated = 230 V (rms)
B = 0.02 Nm/(rad s)
J = 0.2 Nm/(rad s2 )
ird 594.7(s + 46.65)(s2 + 63.7s + 9.61 × 104 )
(s)= 2
vrd (s + 89.86s + 2097)(s2 + 125.6s + 9.716 × 104 )
irq 594.7(s + 46.65)(s2 + 63.7s + 9.61 × 104 )
(s)= 2
vrq (s + 89.86s + 2097)(s2 + 125.6s + 9.716 × 104 )
ωmech −5.6638
(s) =
ird (s + 1)
Qs
(s) = 173.8
irq
(s + 41.2)
Cird = Cirq = 1.1
Fig. 15. DFIG stator-current unbalance as a function of stator-voltage s
unbalance.
(s + 0.5)
Cωmech = −83.8
TABLE I s(s + 92)
SECOND HARMONIC (100 HZ) PULSATION REDUCTION FACTORS
0.04
CQs =
s
471.24s(s + 125.7)
Cd,comp =
(s + 3142)(s2 + 6.283s + 3.948 × 105 )
−4.71s(s + 125.7)
The table shows that, in hardware, the torque pulsations are Cq,comp = .
(s + 3142)(s2 + 6.283s + 3.948 × 105 )
reduced by a factor of 29, the stator reactive power pulsations
are reduced by 23, and the stator-current unbalance (IUF) is
reduced by 5.5.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
IV. CONCLUSION
The authors gratefully acknowledge the help of Dr.
A control methodology for the operation of DFIGs with un- T. Undeland and the faculty, staff, and students of the Norwegian
balanced stator voltages is presented. Simulation and hardware University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
BREKKEN AND MOHAN: CONTROL OF A DOUBLY FED INDUCTION WIND GENERATOR 135