Organizational Decision Making
• Process of responding to a problem by searching
for and selecting a course of action that will
create the most value for organizational
stakeholders
– Finding the best vendor
– How to best service customers
– How to deal with competition
– Where to test launch a product/service
1
Organizational Decision Making
• Formally defined as the process of identifying and
solving problems
• Two stage process mostly:
– Problem identification stage
– Problem solution stage
2
Organizational Decision Making:
Problem Identification
• Who (all) identifies (identify)?
• What gets identified?
3
Decision Making
• Social cognition: the way an individual encodes,
processes, remembers and uses information
• Naïve scientists or cognitive misers
4
Naïve Scientists
• Individuals are rational and logical in decision making
• Rational model
– Diagnose the problem
– Develop alternative solutions
– Evaluate alternatives
– Choose the best alternative
– Implement the chosen alternative
5
Rational Model: Assumptions
• Decision makers have
– have all the information they need
– have the ability to process all information and make the
best decisions
– agree about what needs to be done
6
Carnegie Model
• Decision makers usually do not have
– all the information they need
– the ability to process all information and resort to
satisficing
• Limited information search to identify solutions
• This limited search restricted to few pre defined criteria
– Bounded rationality: limited capacity to process
information about alternatives
7
Cognitive Misers
• Fiske and Taylor (1991) argued we are cognitive
misers
– Our mental processing resources are highly valued, so we
find ways of saving time and effort when involved in
decision making
8
Cognitive Misers
• Fiske and Taylor (1991) argued we are cognitive
misers
– Our mental processing resources are highly valued, so we
find ways of saving time and effort when involved in
decision making ..more so if pressed for time
9
Heuristics
• Time-saving mental shortcuts that reduce
complex judgements to simple rules of thumb
– Heuristics are quick and easy
– Heuristics can result in biased information processing
10
Availability Heuristic
• Tendency to judge the frequency or probability of
an event in terms of how easy it is to think of
examples of that event (Tversky & Kahneman,
1973)
– We might feel more trepidation about taking a flight if
we have just heard about a horrific plane crash
11
Representativeness Heuristic
• Tendency to allocate a set of attributes to
someone if they match the prototype of a given
category (Kahneman & Tversky, 1973)
– We might look for someone with a white coat and
stethoscope when we arrive at a hospital for
treatment
12
Rational Dialectical
Approach Inquiry
Problem identified
Problem identified
Solutions Solutions
suggested suggested
Solutions suggested
Solutions challenged
Solution chosen Solution chosen
13
Types of Decisions
• Programmed decisions: repetitive, well defined,
and for which procedures exist for resolving a
problem
Example: time slots in which classes are scheduled at IIM C;
IIM C summer placement week: No. of rental cars IIM C
hires
14
Types of Decisions
• NonProgrammed decisions: novel and poorly
defined, and no procedure exists
Examples: smoke onboard Air Canada 797
(DFW-YYZ; June 1983)
15
Types of Decisions
• NonProgrammed decisions lead to Programmed
Solutions
– Smoke detectors in washrooms
– Neon strips in the aisles after AC 797
– 90 seconds evacuation rule
16
Organizational Decision Making
• Organizational level decisions are not usually made
by a single manager
• Problem identification and problem solution involve
many departments, multiple viewpoints, and even
other organizations which are beyond the scope of
the individual manager
17
Columbia
18
Why did NASA downplay the threat?
19
Psychological Safety
• The belief that the workplace is conducive to
interpersonal risk, is typically taken-for-granted as
the “way things are around here”, that is, whether
it is easy to speak up, admit error
20
Psychological Safety
• Psy safety = f (interpersonal trust, mutual respect)
• Learning = f (psy safety, …)
• In teams with high psychological safety, members
believe that the group will not rebuke, marginalize,
or penalize them for speaking up or challenging
prevailing opinion
21