2022.05.J. A_Review_of_BLDC_Motor_State_of_Art_Advanced_Control_Techniques_and_Applications
2022.05.J. A_Review_of_BLDC_Motor_State_of_Art_Advanced_Control_Techniques_and_Applications
ABSTRACT Brushless direct current (BLDC) motors are mostly preferred for dynamic applications such
as automotive industries, pumping industries, and rolling industries. It is predicted that by 2030, BLDC
motors will become mainstream of power transmission in industries replacing traditional induction motors.
Though the BLDC motors are gaining interest in industrial and commercial applications, the future of
BLDC motors faces indispensable concerns and open research challenges. Considering the case of reliability
and durability, the BLDC motor fails to yield improved fault tolerance capability, reduced electromagnetic
interference, reduced acoustic noise, reduced flux ripple, and reduced torque ripple. To address these issues,
closed-loop vector control is a promising methodology for BLDC motors. In the literature survey of the
past five years, limited surveys were conducted on BLDC motor controllers and designing. Moreover, vital
problems such as comparison between existing vector control schemes, fault tolerance control improvement,
reduction in electromagnetic interference in BLDC motor controller, and other issues are not addressed.
This encourages the author in conducting this survey of addressing the critical challenges of BLDC motors.
Furthermore, comprehensive study on various advanced controls of BLDC motors such as fault tolerance
control, Electromagnetic interference reduction, field orientation control (FOC), direct torque control (DTC),
current shaping, input voltage control, intelligent control, drive-inverter topology, and its principle of
operation in reducing torque ripples are discussed in detail. This paper also discusses BLDC motor history,
types of BLDC motor, BLDC motor structure, Mathematical modeling of BLDC and BLDC motor standards
for various applications.
INDEX TERMS BLDC motor, torque ripple, current shaping techniques, controlling input voltage, direct
torque control, drive-inverter topology, field orientation control, motor design, fault tolerance control,
electromagnetic interference reduction.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
VOLUME 10, 2022 54833
D. Mohanraj et al.: A Review of BLDC Motor: State of Art, Advanced Control Techniques, and Applications
I. INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND
Before 50 years, T. G Wilson and P.H. Trickey conducted
several experiments to run Direct Current (DC) motors with
solid-state commutation which paved the ideology of devel-
oping BLDC motor [1] which is based on Lorentz’s force law.
In recent decades, BLDC motors have been an area of inten-
FIGURE 1. BLDC motor market analysis by market reports.
sive research to facilitate the penetration of electric vehicles in
the automotive industry. Owing to maneuverability, compact
design and lightweight BLDC motors are found to be used
in several industries such as automotive industries, pumping trains, airplanes, etc., Sensor-less control is achieved in
industries, and rolling industries [2]. Since there will be an three principles namely (i) EMF method with zero-crossing,
increase in demand for electric vehicles in the upcoming (ii) observer-based EMF method, and (iii) magnetic
10 years, BLDC motors are expected to play a vital role. anisotropy method [14]. Mostly EMF method with the
The BLDC motors global market is expected to reach a size zero-crossing principle is preferred [9]. While the other two
of 15.2 billion USD by 2025, from an estimated 9.6 billion principles are tedious to control and are not preferred for low-
USD by 2020 as illustrated in Fig. 1. The enormous growth of speed operations.
this machine has lured several applications [3]. Depending on For an efficient control, the speed of the motor and the
the purpose of applications such as static or dynamic, BLDC commutation logics are being controlled in the drive-by col-
motors provide a good response. They need to be designed lecting the inputs from both the drive and the motors such
appropriately to have good magnetic linkage to be used for as the position of the rotor or rotor angle, stator currents,
various applications such as lifting, cutting, and bracing [4]. hysteresis band current, etc., Proper control of switching of
Compared to the other motors, BLDC motors are expected various switches in motor drives confirms the correct rotation
to have higher efficiency, higher torque to weight ratio, and of the motor [10]. Even though there are various methods
lower operating noise [5]. These machines have stationary for controlling the harmonic content in the supply in drives,
flux in between the rotor and stator which primes the motor to we prefer it to control through the Pulse Width Modulation
run with a unity power factor. BLDC motors are driven using (PWM) technique [11]. Among the PWM techniques, specif-
electronically commutated motor drives. Each phase of the ically, everyone prefers to use space vector PWM (SVPWM)
motor is driven via a closed-loop controller. The main usage control. Current control strategies with PWM and hysteresis
of a closed-loop controller is to provide a current pulse to the controllers play a vital role in improving the performance
motor windings to have control over the speed and torque as of the motor drives. Current control strategies with unipo-
both are complementary phenomena in a motor [6]. BLDC lar PWM can be classified as follows: (i) H-PWM-L-ON,
motor is driven with high accuracy that it produces high wear (ii) H-ON-L-PWM, ON-PWM, (iii) PWM-ON, (iv) PWM-
and tear in load conditions. ON-PWM, (v) H-PWM-L-PWM modes [16].
Few circuits use Hall Effect sensors to directly measure
the rotor’s position, whereas few others measure the back B. LITERATURE SURVEY AND MOTIVATION
electromotive force within the non-driven coils to gather the Even though BLDC motors are found to have high efficiency,
position of the rotor, which are known as sensorless con- the durability of the machine is less compared to induction
trols. A general hall sensor fixed BLDC motor contains three motors [12]. To improve the durability of BLDC motors,
dual-directional outputs which are controlled by a circuit the main challenges such as fault tolerance, Electromagnetic
based on digital logic [7]. interference, acoustic noise, torque ripple, and flux ripple
Other sensor-less controllers are made for measuring the should be controlled. Thus, the controlling techniques are
winding current flow caused by the direction of the magnets discussed in this paper.
to get the position of the rotor and estimating parameters Since BLDC motors are used in dynamic applications,
such as back electromotive force (EMF) and flux [8]. Even Reliability control techniques of motor drives are indispens-
though indirect control (sensor-less) provides less response able. Reliability control techniques such as fault-tolerant con-
compared to direct (with sensor) control and the struc- trol (FTC), electromagnetic interference control (EMI), and
tural complexity increases, indirect controls are preferred in acoustic noise control improve the feasibility of the motor
many high-power automotive applications such as electric drive systems in dynamic applications. The generation of
EMI and acoustic noises lead to motor failures. Hence, it’s low power machines, (v) concentrating coil winding of the
essential to control the faults in prior. The various control same phase is too difficult, (vi) using magnetic step skewing
used to mitigate EMI and acoustic noise generation are dis- methodology increases structural complexity of the BLDC
cussed. If EMI and acoustic noise lead to the development of machine [25].
fault. The fault-tolerant approach used to work as a backup to Furthermore, vector control techniques such as field orien-
continue the operation. The main use of such a technique is tation control (FOC), direct torque control (DTC), and Model
to maintain continuity in operations. predictive control (MPC) schemes functioned drives are pre-
In [13] fast fault diagnosis is performed with help of a rapid ferred a lot to obtain less torque ripple and good dynamic
counter. Whenever the threshold value increases, the fault is response over various vigorous conditions. FOC functioned
detected. The technique is not reliable for high acceleration drives were found in the year 1972 and DTC functioned
applications. In [14] EMI of the machine is reduced by ana- drives were found in the year 1986. During the invention of
lyzing the dc bus voltage at the frequency domain. On anal- these techniques, the development of embedded controllers
ysis, it found that motor structure can improve or decrease was less [26]. However, the improvement in the develop-
the EMI generated. Table 1 represent the comprehensive and ment of the embedded controller resulted in the improve-
concise literature survey done in this paper. ment of the steady-state and dynamic response characteristics
Torque ripples in motors are also mitigated properly by of the motor controller. The development of various novel
designing the structural symmetry and aligning stator poles computational techniques such as finite control set MPC,
in an optimized manner. This results in the reduction of intelligent control algorithm, particle swarm optimization,
the cogging torque which is one of the main reasons for extended Kalman filter algorithm and fuzzy logic estimation
ripple generation which affects high acoustic noise and EMI functioned drives to improve dynamic response [27]. There-
interference in the machine itself [20]. The main reason fore, this review article undertakes a comprehensive study
behind the cogging torque generation is the communication on the current research on brushless direct current motor
between the permanent magnet and stator silicon core [21], and summarizes the up-to-date technological advancement
[22]. Moreover, concerning the design aspects, the cogging in BLDC motor drive controls. Furthermore, in this paper
torque ripples are reduced by modifying the magnetic circuit the mathematical modeling of motor and motor drives. Reli-
of the machines using various methods such as feedback ability control techniques such as EMI filter using LISN
linearization algorithms, using T-shaped bifurcations teeth in techniques, fault-tolerant control using cost observer tech-
stator slots, closing the slots using a sliding separator, using niques, and acoustic noise control using field programmable
notches in the rotor of low power motors, concentrating coil gate array controller are discussed in this paper. The various
winding in the same phase group, reducing claw pole size, ideology of FTC is compared. EMI control techniques are
magnet step skewing method and U-shaped magnetic poles. compared with suppression levels.
These ideologies were performed conventionally to control The significant contribution in this paper is as follows:
the torque ripple of the BLDC motor through designing [23], • A brief history of BLDC motor and their categories are
[24]. Every ideology discussed has its disadvantages such as discussed in detail with diagrams.
(i) Using modified magnetic circuit reduces torque ripple but • A comprehensive review of advanced control techniques
results in the increase of additional harmonics, (ii) using T such as FTC, EMI control, acoustic noise control, and
shaped bifurcation teeth in stator slot reduces the mechanical torque ripple mitigation are discussed.
strength of BLDC machines, (iii) introducing notches in the • The fundamental theory behind BLDC motor designing
rotor is too difficult, (iv) sliding separators can’t be used in and its types are illustrated with real-time cases.
• The simulation and designing of advanced motor con- configurations such as inner rotor and outer rotor. In [28]
trols are discussed in detail. the outer rotor-designed BLDC motor is discussed. The rotor
• The open challenges and future research opportunities permanent magnet is embedded at the outer surface and stator
are discussed. windings are kept stationary inside. The outer rotor BLDC
Fig. 2. represents the flow and survey organization of the increases the output torque and power density of the motor.
presented paper. In the next section, the various types of The outer rotor BLDC motor is mainly used in electric
BLDC motors and state of art are discussed. vehicles, drones, variable drive industries, water pumping,
and home electronics. In [29] outer rotor BLDC motor is
II. TYPES OF BLDC MOTOR designed, the airgap radius between stator and rotor is mini-
BLDC motor physical design is divided into two parts sta- mized. Thus, increasing the torque capability per unit length
tor and rotor. The classification of BLDC motor types is and current. In [30] structural elements are added to increase
shown in Fig. 4. The motor is constructed with various the stability of the rotor. These improve motor characteristics
FIGURE 6. Radial and axial flux. single-phase and three-phase motors are used. Three-phase,
five-phase, and seven-phase motors are preferred for dynamic
applications such as electric vehicles. In [39] multiphase
are more powerful than radial flux motors. In [37] the char- BLDC motor is designed with the help overlapping winding
acteristics of axial flux type BLDC motor are analyzed using strategy. Using an overlapping strategy provides better flux
flux linkage methodology. The mechanical stability of the linkage between the coils. Multiphase motor topologies pro-
BLDC motor is improved by the dual rotor technique. vide good torque characteristics and improved fault tolerance
In [38] three different types of radial flux motors are com- capability. The stator coil winding is star or delta connected.
pared and analyzed. On analysis, it’s found that dual rotor These winding models are preferred depending upon the
type produces good dynamic characteristics. The axial flux application. Star connection is preferred for high torque low-
and radial flux features are compared in Table 4. Fig. 6 rep- speed applications and delta connection is preferred for low
resents the axial and radial flux motor flux linkages flow. torque low-speed applications. Depending on the speed, the
Further, BLDC motor classification based on stator com- number of poles in the rotor is increased.
ponents is discussed. The stator in BLDC can be classified The laminated iron cores are classified as slotted and slot-
based on the number of phases, laminated core types, and less cores. In [40] due to the reaction of the PM flux with the
back EMF. The stator in BLDC can be classified based on the stator’s varying permeance, the slotted stator often generates
number of phases of operation. In static applications, mostly high-order spatial harmonics. This causes a small vibrating
TABLE 5. BLDC stator slotted and slotless structure features. The reluctance between the stator and rotor are assumed to be
null (i.e., there is no change in the stator and rotor reluctance
angle.) then,
Laa = Lbb = Lcc = L (2)
Lab = Lac = Lba = Lca = Lcb = Lbc = M (3)
Substituting the above equations in equation (1),
Vx R 0 0 ia
Vy = 0 R 0 ib + d
Vz 0 0 R ic dt
L M M ia ea
×M L M ib + eb (4)
M M L ic ec
Since the motor is star connected. The stator currents are
considered to be balanced.
ia + ib + ic = 0 (5)
torque on the shaft, which is referred to as cogging torque.
As a result, it reduces operational noise preferred for slotless This is used to simplify the inductance matrix as,
machines. Furthermore, slot-less machines have lower rota-
Mib + Mic = −Mia (6)
tional eddy loss, allowing the motor to run at faster speeds.
Features of slotted and slotless are compared in Table 5. Therefore, the main equation becomes,
The stators are also further classified based on their
Vx R 0 0 ia
back emf waveforms which are sinusoidal waveform and Vy = 0 R 0 ib + d
trapezoidal waveform. The back emf shape depends on the dt
Vz 0 0 R ic
interconnection between the stator windings and the air gap
distance. BLDC motor is more efficient for sinusoidal back L−M 0 0 ia ea
emf compared to trapezoidal back emf. These motors are × 0 L−M 0 ib + eb
a little bit costlier due to the use of more copper windings 0 0 L−M ic ec
compared to trapezoidal back EMF BLDC motors [39]–[41]. (7)
Mathematical modeling of BLDC motors is needed for Since the back EMF of BLDC motor is trapezoidal. The
designing and constructing BLDC motors. The mathematical back EMF equations are given as,
modeling of BLDC motors is discussed in detail. The position
of the BLDC motor can be estimated by designing the model ea fas (θr )
of a conventional DC motor which can be represented by eb = ωm λm fbs (θr ) (8)
winding resistance, the inductance of the winding coils, and ec fcs (θr )
the back electromotive force [41]. where ωm the rotating speed of the motor, λm is the flux
A three-phase BLDC motor has three individual phase linkage of the motor fas (θr ), fbs (θr ) and fcs (θr ) represents the
windings and a permanent magnet rotor. Modeling functions of back EMF for various magnitude instants. The
rotor-induced currents are neglected due to the high resistivity flux linkages between the stator and rotor are made smooth.
of magnets and silicon core [42]. Hence the electromagnetic torque developed by the BLDC
The three-phase voltage equations for windings are mod- motor is given by the following expression:
eled as follows,
1
vx R 0 0
ia Te = ∗ (ea ia + eb ib + ec ic ) (9)
ωm
vy = 0 R 0 ib + d
dt The obtained phase voltage equation looks similar to the
vz 0 0 R ic
armature voltage equation of the direct current machine. The
Laa Lab Lac ia ea equation of motion of motor drive,
× Lba Lbb Lbc ib + eb (1)
dω
Lca Lcb Lcc ic ec + Fω(t)
Te − Tm = J (10)
dt
where vx , vy, and vz are phase voltages of the BLDC motor,
where J is the combined inertia, F is the mechanical friction
R is the stator resistance of the BLDC motor, ia , ib and ic
co-efficient. Mechanical speed of the motor is related by,
are the stator currents of the BLDC motor, Laa , Lbb and
Lcc represent the stator inductance of the BLDC motor, ea , dθr
Pωm = (11)
eb , and ec represent the back EMF of the BLDC motor. dt
The resistance of the machine is assumed to be equal. where P is the number of poles of the motor.
to continue the operation if there is any fault in the rotor global standards of BLDC motors are reviewed in the next
position sensors. Hence, it is very necessary to improve the section.
fault tolerance of the motor [48].
III. STANDARDS AND APPLICATIONS
E. IMPROVED THERMAL STABILITY A. STANDARDS
Technologies must be developed which is very useful in The efficiency of the system is one of the key factors to
improving the thermal stability of the system. Thermal sta- improve the feasibility of a product.
bility can be improved by using winding materials with less Standards of efficiency for motors are set and given by
resistance, stator core with high flux linkage, and interior governing bodies of that particular region such as the Inter-
permanent magnet with high flux linkage. In certain cases, national Electro-technical Commission (IEC) in Europe and
the thermal stability can also be improved by improving the the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
cooling system. In some static scenarios, motor drive systems in the United States of America. Present IEC motor standards
are integrated with motors which may lead the motor to have four levels [50].
operate in high temperatures. Hence, proper cooling must be These IEC 60034-30-1 efficiency classes are categorized
provided to the system [49]. into four are the following
1. IE1 (standard efficiency)
F. LESS NOISE 2. IE2 (high efficiency)
The acoustic noise generation in BLDC motor is due to the 3. IE3 (premium efficiency)
electromagnetic forces, structural design, and odd harmonics 4. IE4 (super premium efficiency)
development in the motor windings. A good BLDC machine The Standard given to the motor defines the efficiency of
has fewer acoustic noises developed. This can be reduced by either a 50 Hz or a 60 Hz motor drive with a single-phase
skewing rotor and stator slots incorrect angles, and commu- winding or three-phase windings built with the BLDC motor
tating power switch at the correct instant [50]. drive with an output power higher than 120W [52].
National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) of
G. HIGH VIBRATION the United States of America has provided the guidelines for
In the general case, whenever a motor is operated by drives motor efficiency standards. The standards are classified as,
there will be the generation of common-mode voltages in the 1. Old Standard Efficiency Motor
cable which connects drive and motor and bearing currents in 2. Prior NEMA EE
the yoke of the motor. This leads to frosting, spark tracks on 3. NEMA Energy
the bearing. Hence, the motor also experiences more vibra- 4. NEMA Premium
tion. This can be reduced by the proper grounding of devices Like the International Electro-technical Commission stan-
using dv/dt filters, and electromagnetic interference (EMI) dards, the NEMA requirements for efficiency also increase
filters [50]. with higher output power. For most of the standards, the
assumptions are made in such a way that each motor drive
H. REDUCTION IN POWER ELECTRONICS COST is manufactured and optimized for a specific application with
Usage of power electronics drives in industry or household different sectors as shown in Fig. 9. In this section, we are
purposes may lead to an increase in the overall expense of the reviewing the various standards of BLDC motors in various
system. These motor drives may be integrated with motors or applications [53].
kept separated. The cost reduction depends on major factors Both inner and outer rotor-based BLDC motors are used in
such as materials, manufacturing process, standardization, diverse applications due to their advantages of high torque-
and modularization [51]. Owing to the various challenges and weight ratio, compact size, etc. However, depending upon the
state of art of BLDC motors, the various applications and required speed of less than 500rpm, 501 to 2000 rpm, 2001 to
10000rpm, and above 1000rpm, the BLDC motor types are comforting systems, etc., [55]. Table 7 shows a comparison
selected for specific applications. of several electric vehicles and their power rating and power
train drive type, operating voltage, power, and battery used
B. ELECTRIC VEHICLE across the world.
By exploring several countries and their development in Increased fault tolerance capability, reduced EMI and
electric vehicle transformation, during the first half of the reduced torque and flux ripples increase the reliability of the
decade, electric vehicle sales were soaring. By now more than BLDC motor in the EV application. In electric vehicles, the
10 million electric vehicles are on the road. In this 47% of the conducted emission sources are characterized in a particular
vehicles are only from China. Similarly in several countries, frequency which leads to distortion of the system. In [56]
more than 1% of its market share is contributed towards the EMI sources which are spread through cables, and their
electric vehicles. BLDC motors are preferred for lightweight mitigation method are discussed. Power cables generate more
electric vehicles. Especially BLDC hub motors are used in EMI due to conductive sources and mismatching frequencies.
electric scooters due to the advantage of retrofitting. BLDC These EMI are mitigated by predicting distributed element
hub motors are driven using both sensor and sensor-less parameters at the resonant frequency of the system. This
motor controllers. In [54] using hub motors in lightweight improves the reliability of BLDC motor systems. Similarly,
electric vehicles improves the Back EMF by 3%. The main improving fault tolerance capability also increases the relia-
disadvantage of using hub motors is (i) increases the weight bility of the system. In [57] a time-efficient fault detection
at the power-driven side which decreases the vehicle sta- algorithm for BLDC, motors in electric vehicles applications
bility, (ii) Delivering uniform torque is too difficult and are discussed. When BLDC motors are subjected to fault
(iii) Mechanical stress experienced by hub motors is more conditions, the speed of the machine fluctuates instead of
compared to normal BLDC motor. IE-2, IE-3, or IE-4 effi- being constant, the back EMF of the machine also varies,
ciency standards-based BLDC motors are used in EVs. and change in phase sequence leads to stator faults. Thus, the
Fig. 10 shows the BLDC hub motor structure and its subparts. fault conditions are detected. The efficient FTC is performed
The motor controller specifications are not standardized till by model-based techniques which are discussed in detail in
now, several manufacturers produce two-wheeler electric a further section. Torque ripples in BLDC motors in EV
vehicles of their customized standards such as operating volt- applications effects shaft failures, increased vibrations, and
age 24 V and 48 V battery power from 40Ah-100Ah, motor acoustic noises. In [58] torque ripples and flux ripples are
power till 6 kW. BLDC motors are not only preferred for reduced by using the DTC algorithm which reduces stator
power transmission in electric vehicles. We can use BLDC iron losses using compensation and improves torque per
motors for applications such as turbochargers, blowers, seat ampere of the machine.
TABLE 7. BLDC motor specifications for EVs in different ranges from India, China, the U.K., and the USA.
FIGURE 10. (a) Hub motor structure. (b) Stator winding Connection. (c) Tire rim. (d) Without stator winding. (e) Motor rear cover.
In the future, multi-motor concepts are given special algorithm which benefits in the reduction of torque ripple and
importance in electric vehicle applications. Hence, the BLDC acoustic noises.
motor-driven electric vehicles with four motors at each wheel Hence, EVs of multi motoring concept drive with huge
are discussed in this paper. The advantages and disadvantages noise. Acoustic noises are reduced by using a vector control
of multi-motor concepts are also discussed. In [59] electric algorithm. In multi motor-driven EVs, Regenerative braking
cars are driven using four hub wheel motors is discussed. affects more energy storage compared to single motor-driven
Driving hub motor at low speed increases the acoustic noises. EVs. In [60] the e-differential technique will be based on
Hence, EVs of multi motoring concept drive with huge Ackerman-Jeantaud geometry. Fig. 11. depicts the block dia-
noise. Acoustic noises are reduced by using a vector control gram of electrical differential for a multidrive system.
FIGURE 13. (a) Many Single rotors in a drone. (b) Single rotor motor model. (c) Volume size of motor. (d) Motor internal parts. (e) Motor
mounting.
FIGURE 14. (a) Multirotor front view. (b) Multirotor drone model. (c) Multirotor view. (d) Multirotor internal part.
surface method. The Usage of Halbach array magnets and of BLDC motor is affected in industry and torque ripple
response face method reduces the losses of BLDC motors and effects are reviewed. In [70] a sensor less control algorithm
improves the power characteristics. for BLDC motor for reciprocating compressors is discussed.
The peak current magnitude causes the demagnetization of
E. INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS permanent magnets in the rotor. These demagnetization cur-
In Industry, BLDC motors are preferred for various applica- rents are measured. The control algorithm is designed that
tions such as automation robots, hoists, elevators, conveyor commutation depends on the level of phase currents. The
belts, and CNC machines. Since BLDC motor has the advan- proposed technique improves the power and torque charac-
tage of providing fine torque in static applications without teristics. In [71] scalar controlled BLDC motors for industrial
any ripples in torque compared to other motors these BLDC applications are discussed. The realization of PWM signals
motors are preferred a lot. Inherent to the above advantages in the motor controller is done with help of input and output
BLDC motor provides less inertia, high torque, and extensive ports in the microcontroller.
operating speed. This simplifies the operation and improves the stability
The main challenges of BLDC motors in the industry are of the operation. In [72] torque developed in BLDC motors
improving fault-tolerant capability, reducing EMI, and torque is reduced by model-based power control schemes. Active
and flux ripple control. In this section, how the reliability and reactive powers are used to control the torque of the
the time transition for each hall sensor is calculated accu- and FTC is discussed. The EMI is controlled by using stray
rately and the degree of rotation is also taken into account. capacitance between cables and the ground plate. FTC is
When a mismatch is encountered between threshold time achieved by ten legs and five modules topology. The FTC
and real-time signal generation, reconstructed signals are capability is investigated using the meantime failure analysis.
generated automatically. In [81] FTC for multiphase motors The various fault and techniques are compared in Table 8.
is discussed. The main purpose of using multiphase motors
is to achieve high torque and power density. FTC is achieved
by controlling the faulty phase currents with the healthy phase B. ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE CONTROL
currents. In [82] the FTC is achieved by an additional phase Electro-Magnetic Interference (EMI) is defined as electro-
leg and fault protective circuits. When there is the detection magnetic signals which interfere with electrical equipment
of open-circuit faults in both buck converter and inverter such as motor, variable frequency drives, power converters,
region, FTC is achieved by choosing the redundant switch etc., EMI is an undesirable disturbance to an electric circuit.
present in between inverter and motor. In [84] FTC three- EMI affects machine performance, efficiency, etc., EMI can
phase BLDC motor is discussed. FTC is achieved by using be classified into (i) radiated EMI and (ii) conductive EMI.
a modular architecture where three individual control loops Fig. 17. represents the basic block diagram of the electro-
which regulate the phase current for each phase gate pulse. magnetic interference algorithm [86]. Conductive EMI is the
The errors are regulated by PI controllers. In [85] a BLDC electromagnetic interference between the source and victim
motor drive system that has less electromagnetic interference which is caused through conductors and Radiative EMI is
the electromagnetic interference between the source and then signals makes the control algorithm complex (ii) the parame-
victim caused through a wireless medium [87]. ter designing complexity increases. In [93] to reduce the EMI
Conducted EMI is found to occur at lower frequencies. It is content wait-free phase continuous carrier frequency modula-
further classified as differential mode and common mode. tion technique is used. WPCFM and digital synthesizer theory
Common mode EMI source is found to be at high source and is combined to obtain a fast response and effective EMI con-
low impedance. Differential mode EMI is caused by pulsating trol. In [91] spectrum modulation technique is used to control
currents. the EMI content. The spectrum modulation techniques reduce
Techniques used to mitigate EMI are classified as follows: the EMI to 5-10dB.
1. EMI filter and shielding
2. Random modulation
3) CHAOTIC PWM
3. Chaotic PWM
The pulses for various power switches in the inverter are
developed using various PWM techniques. This technique
1) EMI FILTERS AND SHIELDING
not only reduces the torque ripple of the machine, but it also
EMI filters are used to reduce the interference in transmission owes to reducing various losses and improving the reliability
lines and power cables. EMI filters provide high input resis- of the converter. The development of EMI is also reduced.
tance to control the frequency content. The main objective of In [92] complementary PWM technique is used to mitigate
the EMI filter reduces the interference between other elec- the electromagnetic emissions in a three-phase inverter. The
tronic devices. EMI filters are further classified as (i) Active common-mode emissions are controlled by the bipolar PWM
filters, (ii) Passive filters, and (iii) Hybrid filters. LISN is technique. Thus, owing to a reduction in EMI. The various
used to stabilize the impedance present in the circuit and pure EMI techniques and their suppression levels are compared in
power without EMI content. Table 9.
In [88] an organized EMI filter was designed to separate
the unwanted noise in a three-phase inverter. The noise level
was reduced to 40dB µV. In [89] Angle modulated switch- C. ACOUSTIC NOISE CONTROL
ing strategy is used to control the EMI in a BLDC motor Acoustic noise control for motor drive systems is one of
drive. The advantage of using this scheme to reduce the the most researched topics by scholars [96]. Only a few
EMI filter size to 50% and the noise level is suppressed to papers are discussed for BLDC motors. Acoustic noise is
10dB µV. In [90] passive filters are designed to control the caused due to many reasons. The major reasons are (i) Torque
EMI generated by the machine. The inductor and capacitor ripple generation (ii) electromagnetic fluctuation (iii) non-
are connected parallel and controls the dv/dt and di/dt spikes ideal spatial distribution of flux density between rotor per-
in the circuit. The stages of LC are increased depending upon manent magnet and the stator slot openings (iv) generation
the dv/dt and di/dt changes. of the harmonic component due to non-ideal distortion of
radial flux. The intricacy in the algorithm increases with
2) RANDOM MODULATION controlling electromagnetic fluctuation and torque ripple of
In random modulation, the switching frequency is varied the BLDC machine. These acoustic noises and vibrations
depending upon the given random signals. Whenever opti- affect increasing EMI content and bearing current generation.
mal switching frequency is given to the power switch. The generation of bearing is one of the most important topics
The unwanted power losses generated are reduced. The which many researchers focus to mitigate. Bearing current
disadvantages of this technique are (i) computing random generation leads to motor bearing lock [97].
The acoustic noise generation depends on various sources permanent magnet is measured instantaneously on various
such as mechanical noise, noises developed due to efficient load conditions and analyzed various remedy actions to
designing, electromagnetic fluctuation, poor alignment, and reduce the acoustic noise developed. The effective method
aerodynamics of the machine. Fig. 18 depicts the various was found to be using slotted stator slots and an embedded
sources of acoustic noises and the transmission path of the permanent magnet rotor. In [100] optimized pole magnetic
system. strategy is used to control the field harmonics and analyzed
One of the most difficult operations in acoustic noise con- the origin of the acoustic noise issue. In [101] the torque
trol is analyzing the root cause of the issue and measuring and flux ripples are predicted as stator currents. In sinu-
the amount of noise generated [98]. The amount of noise soidal commutated BLDC motors, due to field weakening
generated is measured using a microphone and accelerom- radial forces developed are reduced. To optimize this issue,
eter integrated with embedded controllers Fig. 19 depicts a moving band technique with special quadrilateral elements
the block diagram of the methodology used to analyze the is used.
acoustic noise issue. During the analysis, it was found that the developed tech-
Many researchers have discussed several topologies to nique reduces acoustic noises by 30%. In [102] the third
reduce acoustic noise for BLDC motors both in design harmonic component in air gap flux density is eliminated. The
and motor-drive system control algorithm topology. In [99] third harmonic component is managed by forming optical
the field distribution in between the air gap region of the notches in the rotor. Using notches in the rotor reduces the air
mostly preferred as it can verify its control schemes and is reduced by integrating the CSFTC-DTC scheme with a
is easier to operate. Fig. 25. depicts the block diagram of neutral point clamped multilevel inverter. The CSFTC main-
the DTC technique of the BLDC motor. In [110], [111], tains the switching frequency constant. However, the pro-
a DTC scheme with an active null vector control strategy posed technique reduces the output torque but the strategy
is discussed elaborately. In the proposed strategy the signs used for controlling is very complex.
of error are determined by the two-level flux and torque
hysteresis comparator. Here the torque slopes, the switching D. CURRENT SHAPING TECHNIQUE
time is calculated with the above inputs, and the torque of the The current shaping technique refers to dodging the gate
motor can be estimated. This scheme has the advantage of pulse generation in power switches of VSI when an abnor-
comparing torque and flux responses of various vectors. mal event such as overcurrent, speed up, and overloading is
Twelve-step direct torque control is introduced to control detected. Fig. 26. depicts the block diagram of the current
the vectors with help of a five-level hysteresis controller. shaping technique of the BLDC motor. Generally, the steps
In the proposed scheme the vectors are divided into twelve followed by this scheme are sensing high current, recognizing
sectors which means for every thirty degrees of rotation, overcurrent events, turning off logic, and re-enabling action
the current and voltage parameter is uploaded to the con- for high current detection. In [114], a technique where the
troller [112]. It has been discussed clearly that torque rip- torque ripples are reduced by using the small capacitors is
ples can be mitigated by maintaining constant current and discussed. The charging and discharging of the capacitor may
varying the frequency from low to high by using the DTC return high voltage to the input system which might damage
technique. Stator fluxes are controlled by using hysteresis the drive system. A new turn-off logic scheme is introduced
controllers. In [113], the Torque ripple of the induction motor which would not affect the power switches.
will switch on during the commutation of the outgoing phase the gate pulse generating algorithm of the conventional sys-
switch. This may improve the speed of ripples. To reduce tem. Using this strategy, a new method is observed and gate
it, the outgoing phase switch is kept on even after the phase pulse is generated. The output of the concerned technique
outgoes. In [122], converter topology for both modified sin- contains fewer torque ripples.
gle end primary inductance converter and three-level neutral
point clamped multilevel inverter is integrated and investi- G. DRIVE INVERTER TOPOLOGY
gated in detail. These integrated topologies give good results Z-source inverters (ZSI) are single-stage power converters
compared to the previously discussed topologies. with voltage buck-boost capabilities. The z-source is placed
in between the voltage source and inverter to boost the
F. INTELLIGENT CONTROL voltage from the voltage source. The advancement in this
Controlling torque and flux without a controller is impossible. feature led to the development of quasi-Z-source, switched
Hence, a controller is necessary for every mitigation tech- inductor z-source, etc., Fig. 29. Depicts the block diagram of
nique Compared to the other techniques, implementing an drive inverter topology operated motor controller of BLDC
advanced controller has the advantage of analyzing several motor. In [128], a drive system integrated with quasi-Z-source
parameters. Conventional PI and PID controllers are used is discussed in detail. Since quasi-Z-source is meant for
in industries and several applications. Fig. 28. depicts the increasing the source voltage, a shutdown network is installed
block diagram of intelligent control technique of torque ripple in-between z-source and voltage source for controlling the
mitigation of BLDC motor. In [124], a fuzzy logic estimator output voltages. A new control system for space vector
is investigated to reduce the torque ripples. modulation is also discussed. The torque ripple mitigation
The function of this neural scheme concept-based con- is achieved by a hybrid topology of two processes predic-
troller is to regulate the commutation angle to maintain the tive control and voltage-based torque ripple mitigation. The
slew rates of the commutated phase while keeping the non- results are evidence that this technique has more advan-
commutating phase current constant. In this scheme, both tages than the conventional technique constant dc source.
the motor winding parameters and output parameters such [129] discusses the model and design of a permanent magnet
as torque are analyzed and a new commutation is gener- brushless dc motor which is fed by a Z source inverter.
ated. In [125], an integrated loss minimization control and a The paper discusses the limitations of permanent magnet
wavelet speed controller performance are discussed in detail. BLDC motor (PMBDCM) and explains about two techniques
The speed errors between actual and command speeds are to overcome the limitations of PMBDCM powered by fuel
given as input to the loss minimization controller. These cell, of which one technique is using Z-source inverter. The
outputs are processed using power processing units which paper discusses the advantages of Z source fed PMBDCM
helps us to reduce the torque ripples of the drive output. like higher efficiency, bucked/boosted voltage ability, and
In [126], a spider web-based algorithm integrated with a small feasibility of adjustable speed drive systems with motors like
capacitor for varying dc-link voltage is discussed in detail. PMBDCM.
The algorithm and feedback are compiled and used to The ZSI is coupled with PWM to get 120o square wave-
generate the switching sequences. In [127], the torque ripple forms which are said to be apt for the system.
of the BLDC motor is reduced by using a model predictive Various state-space models such as the impedance source
control algorithm the learning is done for varying speed and network and voltage source fed permanent magnet brushless
TABLE 10. Comparison of various torque ripple mitigation techniques of BLDC motors.
dc motor are compared and the equivalent circuit of both voltage stresses were also minimized. In [131] discusses the
the systems are shown to bring in a comparative difference control methods of ZSI and compares voltage boost and
between the two systems. The simulation waveforms are also modulation index. The paper initially discusses the PWM
depicted which show that the system works like a VSI fed technique used in a 3 phase VSI whose gating sequence for
permanent magnet BLDC motor. After the first second when voltage boost can be applied to ZSI with a few modifications
the necessary boosted function is fed to the system, it displays in the shoot through. A few equations of voltage boost and
shoot through intervals, and the capacitor voltage is boosted voltage stress are shown and depicted and the comparisons
up to 400V. Along with this, the torque and rotor speed also are put forward using the equations. The simulation of maxi-
increases to their rated values. Two boost control methods for mum boost control shows that the voltage gain is the same for
a Z source inverter are shown in [130]. the same modulation index and increase modulation index.
The paper discusses the flaws of a normal voltage source The paper shows the two control methods used for extracting
inverter whose maximum boosted voltage cannot exceed the the maximum boosted voltage of the ZSI and also shows a
DC bus voltage. The system shows the design of boost con- clear study on the relationship between boosted voltage and
trol which gives maximum output value for any modulation modulation index.
index. To reduce the cost of the boost control, there should
be a constant shoot-through duty cycle or duty ratio which VI. CONTROL TECHNIQUES EQUATIONS AND
is shown in this paper for five different modulation curves. COMPARISON
A comparison of several control methods is conducted and The comparison of various torque ripple mitigation tech-
it is concluded that the maximum boost control for the ZSI niques of the BLDC motor is illustrated in Table 10. The
eliminated low-frequency ripples in the output frequency and above-mentioned topologies are mentioned and compared
in terms of the adopted technique, advantages, and disad- recommended for both scalar and vector control schemes.
vantages. The topological equations used to control various The simulation results proving the most efficient control
torque ripple mitigation techniques are depicted in Fig. 30. techniques and motor results are discussed in the upcoming
In a comparison of various torque ripple mitigation sections.
techniques dealt with control schemes, it is inferred that
controlling torque ripple at a wide speed range is too dif- VII. DESIGN PLATFORM FOR BLDC MOTOR
ficult. The input voltage-controlled technique is favorable The design and development of high-performance BLDC
with less computational intricacy, easy to implement, and motors for various applications are given in [136]. The tech-
provides good behavior for dynamic applications such as nology used to develop the design optimum balanced solution
electric vehicles, pumping applications, etc., Compared to the of various factors like cost, power density, torque density,
above-mentioned techniques, vector control techniques such max speed, efficiency, simplicity for ease in manufacturing,
as intelligent control, current shaping technique, DTC and etc., are discussed.
FOC provides good dynamic behavior on contrary to com- Designing of BLDC motor for light electric vehicle appli-
putational intricacy. Multi-level inverter topologies are also cations is carried out in this section. The 2 kW BLDC motor
A. ELECTRO-MAGNETIC DESIGN
Selection of motor topology, slot-pole ratio, winding layout,
Stator, and rotor geometry [137].
B. THERMAL DESIGN
Selection winding class, Varnish type, potting material selec-
tion. Design of cooling jacket based on accurate boundary
conditions [138].
C. STRUCTURAL DESIGN
Analysing and optimizing stress concentration areas in vari-
ous motor components. Calculation of various safety factors
for structural components and improvising using geometry and Fig. 32 represents the procedures involved in designing
optimization [140]. BLDC motor.
FIGURE 35. Outer rotor flux distribution and magnetic flux lines.
FIGURE 33. Inner rotor flux distribution and magnetic flux lines.
torque compared to the inner rotor. In the design aspect, the
outer rotor when compared to the inner rotor, the minimum
rated current or lower duty cycle occurs at rated speed. Max-
imum flux distribution is 1.86 Tesla when the rotor rotates
from 0 to 360 degrees measured in each position as shown
in Fig. 35 [143].
The optimized geometry simulation output waveform for
the outer rotor is shown in Fig. 39. The rotation of motor
rotor position is plotted between cogging torque and speed
characteristics.
The geometry parameters are optimized for the same
dimensions mentioned in Table 11. The interaction between
outer rotor rotation permanent magnet and stator slots coils
maximum torque, rated torque, efficiency, core loss, power,
flux pattern with speed characteristics transient conditions is
discussed in [144]. The outer rotor cogging torque vs rotor
FIGURE 34. Inner rotor cogging torque, torque, power, and efficiency.
rotation speed, and the outer rotor magnet cogging torque is
very low compared to inner rotor torque as shown in Fig. 36.
In output torque vs rotor position graph, at the initial rotor
efficiency starts to increase and it reaches a maximum of 88% start position, the torque reaches a maximum is 35 Nm. When
at 1800rpm. For rated speed 1500 rpm, efficiency is 82% and the rotor changes the initial position, speed starts to increase
core loss reduced maximum all are depicted in Fig. 34. as rated torque decreases, it reaches 14 Nm at a rated speed of
1000 rpm. In the output power vs rotor speed characteristics
F. OUTER ROTOR (HUB MOTOR) at a rated speed of 1000 rpm, the power reaches 1.75 kW.
The outer rotor or in wheel motor stator slot winding is In the efficiency vs rotor position speed, at rated 1000 rpm
connected inside and the rotor magnet is mounted outside. the efficiency reaches 88% and comparison results of main
The primary advantage of the hub motor is low cogging parameters are listed in Table 12.
FIGURE 38. FOC fed torque and flux response at 1000 rpm.
FIGURE 36. Outer rotor cogging torque, torque, power, and efficiency.
FIGURE 39. DTC fed torque and flux response at 500 rpm.
FIGURE 37. FOC fed Torque and flux response at 500 rpm.
FIGURE 41. Intelligent control fed torque and flux response at 500 rpm.
FIGURE 42. Intelligent control fed Torque and flux response at 1000 rpm.
TABLE 18. Review of various torque ripple mitigation techniques. electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles is increasing.
BLDC motors are gaining more interest in EV applications
due to their simple, robust, and high-efficiency ability. This
paper reviews various types of BLDC motors, their standards,
applications, torque ripple mitigation techniques, and BLDC
motor control techniques, in addition to a discussion on the
development of a design platform for BLDC motors. A cur-
rent study reveals that,
• Currently, outer surface rotor-type BLDC motors such
as Hub motors are used widely for commercial applica-
tions.
• The BLDC motor control drive is used to overcome
fault-tolerant control, electromagnetic interference con-
trol, and acoustic noise control techniques are discussed.
• Outer surface rotor-type motors are more popular due
to the minimum cogging torque leading to high load-
ing effect, high power, and increased efficiency. These
motors have a lower requirement of cooling for the rotor
as they are exposed to the outer atmosphere receiving
ambient air cooling.
• Torque ripples in BLDC motors are more at low speeds
and less at high speeds. However, Axial-type BLDC
motors have higher efficiency and higher torque than
the other types of EV motors. Hub motor is used in EV
due to its advantage of compact size and retrofitting type
model.
• Intelligent controller stands superior amongst the var-
ious control techniques used for BLDC motors as it
reduces torque ripples better than the other types of
• Direct torque control topology can be developed with controllers.
help of reference voltage vectors for BLDC motor and • Design and FEA analysis of an inner rotor type BLDC
its complexity can be reduced. motor and an outer rotor type BLDC motor have been
• Multi-level inverter topologies can be developed using presented in this paper. The simulation results substan-
vector control technique for BLDC motor. tiate the effectiveness of the outer surface rotor-type
• BLDC motor drives can be developed with SVPWM and BLDC motor. Hardware results also confirm the simu-
MLI concepts. SVPWM concepts can be initiated with lation results.
fewer vectors. • Finally, the challenges in BLDC motor current control
• Intelligent control concepts can be developed with less techniques and future opportunities are discussed for
complexity by reducing the torque and flux control vec- future researchers.
tors in control schemes.
• BLDC motor controllers should be developed in such a APPENDIX
manner that it produces less torque ripple during faulty Ac = cross-sectional area of a conductor in mm
conditions with extra power switches. Acu = area of a copper conductor in a slot in m2
• Bearing current reduction can be given more importance Bg = Air gap flux density in the middle 1200 of a poles
while discussing EMI reduction for BLDC motor drive Wb/m2
system Bmax = Maximum flux density in Wb/m2
• FTC algorithm for inverter multiple switch tube prob- Dc = Diameter of the conductor in mm
lems should be approached. ds = slot depth in mm
• FTC based Artificial neural network algorithm must be Dsteel = Density of steel in kg/m3
discussed for various faults such as stator intern fault and Eb = Back EMF of the motor in volts
demagnetization fault. Ec = EMF induced per conductor in volts
Et = EMF induced in a turn in volts
XI. CONCLUSION g = air gap in mm
The automobile industry is migrating towards eco-friendly Ic = current through a conductor in amps
transportation with less pollution, hence attention towards Iphase = phase current in amps.
1
As =(wst + wsb ) ∗ ds [9] G. Sotyaramadhani, A. Wikarta, and M. N. Yuniarto, ‘‘Different approach
2 of fuzzy logic algorithm implementation for increasing performance of
2π (Rsi + ds ) axial BLDC motor,’’ in Proc. AIP Conf., 2018, Art. no. 060010.
wst = − wt [10] S. De, M. Rajne, S. Poosapati, C. Patel, and K. Gopakumar, ‘‘Low induc-
N tance axial flux BLDC motor drive for more electric aircraft,’’ in Proc.
Stator back iron Aerosp. Conf., Mar. 2011, pp. 1–11, doi: 10.1109/AERO.2011.5747464.
[11] E. Yeşilbağ, Y. Ertuğrul, and L. Ergene, ‘‘Axial flux PM BLDC motor
2πRsi Bg πRsi design methodology and comparison with a radial flux PM BLDC
LBg = wbi LBmax ; wbi =
2p Bmax P motor,’’ TURKISH J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 25, pp. 3455–3467,
2017.
Rso = Rsi + ds + wbi [12] S. Sakunthala, R. Kiranmayi, and P. N. Mandadi, ‘‘A study on
industrial motor drives: Comparison and applications of PMSM and
Weight of the BLDC motor BLDC motor drives,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Energy, Commun., Data
Rotor Anal. Soft Comput. (ICECDS), Aug. 2017, pp. 537–540, doi: 10.1109/
ICECDS.2017.8390224.
Vrotor = π R2ro L [13] G. D. Donato, G. Scelba, M. Pulvirenti, G. Scarcella, and F. G. Capponi,
‘‘Low-cost, high-resolution, fault-robust position and speed estimation
Wrotor = Dsteel ∗ Vrotor for PMSM drives operating in safety-critical systems,’’ IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 550–564, Jan. 2019.
Stator [14] Y. Ming and J.-X. Shen, ‘‘Research on conducted EMI and vibra-
tion characteristics of PM BLDC motors with different stator struc-
Vstator = π R2so − R2si L − Ns As L tures,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Electr. Mach. Syst., Aug. 2011, pp. 1–6, doi:
10.1109/ICEMS.2011.6073454.
Wstator = Dsteel ∗ Vstator [15] A. Tashakori and M. Ektesabi, ‘‘A simple fault tolerant control system for
Hall effect sensors failure of BLDC motor,’’ in Proc. IEEE 8th Conf. Ind.
Windings Electron. Appl. (ICIEA), Jun. 2013, pp. 1011–1016.
[16] M. Perotti, ‘‘On the influence of the load parasitics on the CM con-
Vcu = Nph pns lt Ac ducted EMI of BLDC motor drives,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Env-
iron. Electr. Eng. Ind. Commercial Power Syst. Eur. (EEEIC/I&CPS
Wcu = Dcu ∗ Vrotor Eur.), Jun. 2020, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope49358.
2020.9160663.
Overall weight [17] G. Buja, M. Bertoluzzo, and R. K. Keshri, ‘‘Torque ripple-free oper-
ation of PM BLDC drives with petal-wave current supply,’’ IEEE
Wmotor = Wrotor + Wstator + Wcu Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 4034–4043, Jul. 2015, doi:
ρcu lt 10.1109/TIE.2014.2385034.
Rt = ; Rph = ρns Rt [18] A. Darba, F. D. Belie, P. D’haese, and J. A. Melkebeek, ‘‘Improved
Ac dynamic behavior in BLDC drives using model predictive speed and
current control,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 728–740,
E. BLDC LOSSES Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2015.2477262.
Copper losses [19] S.-K. Lee, G.-H. Kang, J. Hur, and B.-W. Kim, ‘‘Stator and rotor
shape designs of interior permanent magnet type brushless DC motor
Ploss cu = 2 Is2 Rph for reducing torque fluctuation,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 48, no. 11,
pp. 4662–4665, Nov. 2012.
Core losses [20] M. A. N. Doss, S. Jeevananthan, S. S. Dash, and M. J. Hussain, ‘‘Critical
evaluation of cogging torque in BLDC motor with various techniques,’’
Int. J. Autom. Control., vol. 7, pp. 135–146, Jan. 2013.
Ploss core = (coreloss/Kg) ∗ Wstator
[21] A. M. Doss, M. Ramasamy, and M. S. Karthikeyan, ‘‘Cogging torque
reduction in brushless dc motor by reshaping of rotor magnetic poles
REFERENCES with grooving techniques,’’ Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., vol. 10, no. 36,
pp. 27781–27785, 2015.
[1] H.-W. Kim, K.-T. Kim, Y.-S. Jo, and J. Hur, ‘‘Optimization methods of
torque density for developing the neodymium free SPOKE-type BLDC [22] Z. Guo, L. Chang, and Y. Xue, ‘‘Cogging torque of permanent magnet
motor,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 2173–2176, May 2013, electric machiens: An overview,’’ in Proc. Can. Conf. Electr. Comput.
doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2013.2237890. Eng., May 2009, pp. 1172–1177, doi: 10.1109/CCECE.2009.5090310.
[2] J. Shao, ‘‘An improved microcontroller-based sensor less brushless DC [23] G. Liu, C. Cui, K. Wang, B. Han, and S. Zheng, ‘‘Sensorless control for
(BLDC) motor drive for automotive applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. high-speed brushless DC motor based on the Line-to-Line back EMF,’’
Appl., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1216–1221, Sep. 2006. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 4669–4683, Jul. 2016.
[3] J. Shao, ‘‘An improved microcontroller-based sensorless brushless DC [24] A. Ahfock and D. Gambetta, ‘‘Sensorless commutation of printed circuit
(BLDC) motor drive for automotive applications,’’ in Proc. 40th IAS brushless direct current motors,’’ IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 4, no. 6,
Annu. Meeting. Conf. Rec. Ind. Appl. Conf., Oct. 2005, pp. 2512–2517. pp. 397–406, Jul. 2010.
[4] C. L. Xia, Permanent Magnet Brushless DC Motor Drives and Controls. [25] T. Yazdan, W. Zhao, T. A. Lipo, and B.-I. Kwon, ‘‘A novel technique for
Singapore: Wiley, 2012. two-phase BLDC motor to avoid demagnetization,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn.,
[5] K. P. Kumar, ‘‘Modeling of a commercial BLDC motor and control using vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1–4, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2016.2521874.
GA- controller for a BLDC propulsion application for hybrid electric [26] G. Haines and N. Ertugrul, ‘‘Wide speed range sensorless opera-
vehicle,’’ Int. J. Psychosocial Rehabil., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1604–1613, tion of brushless permanent-magnet motor using flux linkage incre-
Dec. 2019. ment,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 4052–4060,
[6] A. Senthilnathan and P. Palanivel, ‘‘Fuzzy logic controller based zeta Jul. 2016.
converter for BLDC motor,’’ J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst., vol. 12, no. 7, [27] J. Shao, ‘‘An improved microcontroller-based sensor less brushless DC
pp. 125–133, Jul. 2020. (BLDC) motor drive for automotive applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind.
[7] H.-J. Kim, ‘‘BLDC motors for robot vacuum cleaners,’’ Trans. Korean Appl., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1216–1221, Sep./Oct. 2006.
Inst. Electr. Eng., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 172–174, Dec. 2011. [28] S.-T. Jo, H.-S. Shin, Y.-G. Lee, J.-H. Lee, and J.-Y. Choi, ‘‘Optimal
[8] J. W. K. K. Jayasundara and R. Munasinghe, ‘‘Software design tool for design of a BLDC motor considering three-dimensional structures using
optimum axial flux BLDC motors,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Inf. Syst. the response surface methodology,’’ Energies, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 461,
(ICIIS), Dec. 2009, pp. 526–531. Jan. 2022.
[29] T.-Y. Lee, M.-K. Seo, Y.-J. Kim, and S.-Y. Jung, ‘‘Motor design and [49] K. Karthik, R. K. Kumar, and P. Sreenivasulu, ‘‘Modeling and perfor-
characteristics comparison of outer-rotor-type BLDC motor and BLAC mance analysis of BLDC motor under different operating speed condi-
motor based on numerical analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., tions,’’ Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, pp. 21468–21475, Jun. 2017.
vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TASC.2016.2548079. [50] D. G. Dorrell, ‘‘A review of the methods for improving the efficiency
[30] R. K. Behera, R. Kumar, S. M. Bellala, and P. Raviteja, ‘‘Analysis of of drive motors to meet IE4 efficiency standards,’’ J. Power Electron.,
electric vehicle stability effectiveness on wheel force with BLDC motor vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 842–851, Sep. 2014.
drive,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Electron. Sustain. Energy Syst. [51] A. Nami, ‘‘Power electronics for future power grids: Drivers and chal-
(IESES), Jan. 2018, pp. 195–200, doi: 10.1109/IESES.2018.8349873. lenges,’’ in Proc. 20th Eur. Conf. Power Electron. Appl. (EPE ECCE Eur.),
[31] I.-S. Jung, H.-G. Sung, Y.-D. Chun, and J.-H. Borm, ‘‘Magnetization Sep. 2018, p. 1.
modeling of a bonded magnet for performance calculation of inner-rotor [52] O. Tosun, N. F. O. Serteller, and G. Yalcin, ‘‘Comprehensive design and
type BLDC motor,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 2810–2813, optimization of brushless direct current motor for the desired operating
Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1109/20.951314. conditions,’’ in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Electron., Jun. 2021, pp. 1–6, doi:
[32] A. Damiano, A. Floris, G. Fois, I. Marongiu, M. Porru, and A. Serpi, 10.1109/IEEECONF52705.2021.9467459.
‘‘Design of a high-speed ferrite-based brushless DC machine for elec- [53] B. V. R. Kumar and K. S. Kumar, ‘‘Design of a new dual rotor radial
tric vehicles,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 4279–4287, flux BLDC motor with Halbach array magnets for an electric vehicle,’’
Sep./Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2017.2699164. in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Power Electron., Drives Energy Syst. (PEDES),
[33] R. Qu and T. A. Lipo, ‘‘Dual-rotor, radial-flux, torodially wound, Dec. 2016, pp. 1–5.
permanent-magnet machines,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 39, no. 6, [54] V. Bogdan, M. Adrian, L. Leonard, B. Alexandra, S. Alecsandru, and
pp. 1665–1673, Nov. 2003. N. Ionut, ‘‘Design and optimization of a BLDC motor for small power
[34] R. Qu and T. A. Lipo, ‘‘Design and parameter effect analysis of dual- vehicles,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Electromech. Energy Syst. (SIELMEN),
rotor, radial-flux, toroidally wound, permanent-magnet machines,’’ IEEE Oct. 2021, pp. 438–443, doi: 10.1109/SIELMEN53755.2021.9600327.
Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 771–779, May 2004. [55] T. A. Anuja and M. A. N. Doss, ‘‘Reduction of cogging torque in surface
[35] R. Qu and T. A. Lipo, ‘‘Design and optimization of dual-rotor, radial-flux, mounted permanent magnet brushless DC motor by adapting rotor mag-
toroidally-wound, permanent-magnet machines,’’ in Proc. 38th IAS Annu. netic displacement,’’ Energies, vol. 14, no. 10, p. 2861, May 2021, doi:
Meeting Conf. Rec. Ind. Appl. Conf., Nov. 2003, pp. 1397–1404. 10.3390/en14102861.
[36] R. Qu and T. A. Lipo, ‘‘Analysis and modeling of air gap and zigzag [56] L. Zhai, L. Lin, X. Zhang, and C. Song, ‘‘The effect of distributed parame-
leakage fluxes in a surface-mounted-PM machine,’’ in Proc. 37th IAS ters on conducted EMI from DC-fed motor drive systems in electric vehi-
Annu. Meeting, Feb. 2002, pp. 2507–2513. cles,’’ Energies, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 1, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.3390/en10010001.
[37] S. H. Lee, S. B. Park, S. O. Kwon, J. Y. Lee, J. J. Lee, J. P. Hong, and [57] A. Usman and B. S. Rajpurohit, ‘‘Time-efficient fault diagnosis of a
J. Hur, ‘‘Characteristic analysis of the slotless axial-flux type brushless BLDC motor drive deployed in electric vehicle applications,’’ in Proc.
DC motors using image method,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, IEEE Global Humanitarian Technol. Conf. (GHTC), Oct. 2020, pp. 1–5,
pp. 1327–1330, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.871922. doi: 10.1109/GHTC46280.2020.9342941.
[38] L. Yang, J. Zhao, X. Liu, A. Haddad, J. Liang, and H. Hu, ‘‘Comparative [58] A. Khazaee, H. A. Zarchi, G. A. Markadeh, and H. Mosaddegh Hesar,
study of three different radial flux ironless BLDC motors,’’ IEEE Access, ‘‘MTPA strategy for direct torque control of brushless DC motor drive,’’
vol. 6, pp. 64970–64980, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878267. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 6692–6700, Aug. 2021, doi:
[39] E. Bostanci, Z. Neuschl, and R. Plikat, ‘‘Influence of phase magnetic 10.1109/TIE.2020.3009576.
couplings on phase current characteristics of multiphase BLDC machines [59] D. Lu, J. Li, M. Ouyang, and J. Gu, ‘‘Research on hub motor control of
with overlapping phase windings,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 51, no. 9, four-wheel drive electric vehicle,’’ in Proc. IEEE Vehicle Power Propuls.
pp. 1–13, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2015.2430833. Conf., Sep. 2011, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/VPPC.2011.6043150.
[40] S. H. Lee, S. B. Park, S. O. Kwon, J. Y. Lee, J. J. Lee, J. P. Hong, and [60] C. Depature, W. Lhomme, and A. Bouscayrol, ‘‘Teaching electric vehi-
J. Hur, ‘‘Characteristic analysis of the slotless axial-flux type brushless cle drive control using energetic macroscopic representation,’’ in Proc.
DC motors using image method,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, World Electr. Vehicle Symp. Exhib. (EVS), Nov. 2013, pp. 17–20, doi:
pp. 1327–1330, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.871922. 10.1109/EVS.2013.6914831.
[41] H. Jin, G. Liu, and S. Zheng, ‘‘Commutation error closed-loop correc- [61] R. Kumar and B. Singh, ‘‘BLDC motor driven solar PV array fed water
tion method for sensorless BLDC motor using hardware-based floating pumping system employing zeta converter,’’ in Proc. IEEE 6th India Int.
phase back-EMF integration,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 18, no. 6, Conf. Power Electron. (IICPE), Dec. 2014, pp. 1–6.
pp. 3978–3986, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3113368. [62] R. Kumar and B. Singh, ‘‘Grid interactive solar PV based water pumping
[42] S. Tsotoulidis and A. N. Safacas, ‘‘Deployment of an adaptable sensorless using BLDC motor drive,’’ in Proc. IEEE 7th Power India Int. Conf.
commutation technique on BLDC motor drives exploiting zero sequence (PIICON), Nov. 2016, pp. 1–6.
voltage,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 877–886, [63] R. Kumar and B. Singh, ‘‘Brushless DC motor-driven grid-interfaced
Feb. 2015. solar water pumping system,’’ IET Power Electron., vol. 11, no. 12,
[43] W. Chen, H. Liu, X. Gu, X. Li, and T. Shi, ‘‘A position sensorless control pp. 1875–1885, Oct. 2018.
strategy for brushless DC motor based on the back-electromotive force [64] B. Singh and R. Kumar, ‘‘Solar PV array fed brushless DC motor driven
function,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 34, no. 22, pp. 4661–4669, water pump,’’ in Proc. IEEE 6th Int. Conf. Power Syst. (ICPS), Mar. 2016,
Jan. 2019. pp. 1–5.
[44] P. Damodharan and K. Vasudevan, ‘‘Sensorless brushless DC motor drive [65] S. Sashidhar and B. G. Fernandes, ‘‘A low-cost semi-modular dual-stack
based on the zero-crossing detection of back electromotive force (EMF) PM BLDC motor for a PV based bore-well submersible pump,’’ in Proc.
from the line voltage difference,’’ IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 25, Int. Conf. Electr. Mach. (ICEM), Sep. 2014, pp. 24–30.
no. 3, pp. 661–668, Sep. 2010. [66] S. Sashidhar and B. G. Fernandes, ‘‘A novel ferrite SMDS spoke-type
[45] X. Zhou, Y. Zhou, C. Peng, F. Zeng, and X. Song, ‘‘Sensorless BLDC BLDC motor for PV bore-well submersible water pumps,’’ IEEE Trans.
motor commutation point detection and phase deviation correction Ind. Electron., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 104–114, Jan. 2017.
method,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 5880–5892, [67] R. V. Medeiros, J. G. S. Ramos, T. Nascimento, A. C. Lima Filho, and
Jun. 2019. A. Brito, ‘‘A novel approach for brushless DC motors characterization
[46] T.-Y. Ho, ‘‘The design of motor drive for brushless DC motor,’’ in in drones based on chaos,’’ Drones, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 14, Apr. 2018, doi:
Electric Machines for Smart Grids Applications—Design, Simulation 10.3390/drones2020014.
and Control. London, U.K.: Intech Open, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.5772/inte- [68] A. Bosso, C. Conficoni, D. Raggini, and A. Tilli, ‘‘A computational-
chopen.78815. effective field-oriented control strategy for accurate and efficient
[47] W. Fan and T. Chen, ‘‘Design and implementation of fuzzy PID controller electric propulsion of unmanned aerial vehicles,’’ IEEE/ASME
for brushless DC motor control system,’’ Appl. Mech. Mater., vol. 432, Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1501–1511, Jun. 2021, doi:
pp. 472–477, Sep. 2013. 10.1109/TMECH.2020.3022379.
[48] G. Guruvareddiyar and B. Subathra, ‘‘An open and short circuit switch [69] Y. Park, H. Kim, H. Jang, S.-H. Ham, J. Lee, and D.-H. Jung, ‘‘Efficiency
fault of power converters in PM-BLDC motor in electric vehicle,’’ in Proc. improvement of permanent magnet BLDC with Halbach magnet array for
IEEE Int. Conf. Clean Energy Energy Efficient Electron. Circuit Sustain. drone,’’ IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1–5, Jun. 2020,
Develop. (INCCES), Dec. 2019, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/TASC.2020.2971672.
[70] K.-W. Lee, D.-K. Kim, B.-T. Kim, and B.-I. Kwon, ‘‘A novel starting [89] F. Krall, H. Gruebler, and A. Muetze, ‘‘Analysis of the angle modulated
method of the surface permanent-magnet BLDC motors without position switching strategy for use with fractional horse power BLDC motors,’’
sensor for reciprocating compressor,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 44, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 5460–5472, May 2021,
no. 1, pp. 85–92, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2007.912734. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3028604.
[71] N. Kim, H. A. Toliyat, I. M. Panahi, and M.-H. Kim, ‘‘BLDC motor [90] T. Rahimi, S. Y. Khangah, and B. Yousefi, ‘‘Reduction EMI due to di/dt
control algorithm for low-cost industrial applications,’’ in Proc. APEC and dv/dt DC and AC sides of BLDC motor drive,’’ in Proc. 5th Annu.
22nd Annu. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo., Feb. 2007, Int. Power Electron., Drive Syst. Technol. Conf. (PEDSTC), Feb. 2014,
pp. 1400–1405. pp. 428–433, doi: 10.1109/PEDSTC.2014.6799414.
[72] A. G. de Castro, W. C. A. Pereira, T. E. P. Almeida, C. M. R. de Oliveira, [91] N. Mousavi, T. Rahimi, and H. M. Kelk, ‘‘Reduction EMI of BLDC
J. R. B. A. Monteiro, and A. A. de Oliveira, ‘‘Improved finite control- motor drive based on software analysis,’’ Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 2016,
set model-based direct power control of BLDC motor with reduced pp. 1–9, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1155/2016/1497360.
torque ripple,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 4476–4484, [92] M. Perotti and F. Fiori, ‘‘Investigating the EMI mitigation in power
Sep./Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2018.2835394. inverters using delay compensation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,
[73] R. Khopkar, S. M. Madmi, M. Hajiaghajani, and H. A. Tohya, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 4270–4278, May 2019, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2018.
‘‘A low-cost BLDC motor drive using buck-boost converter for res- 2858015.
idential and commercial applications,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Electr. [93] Y. Chen, M. Yang, J. Long, D. Xu, and F. Blaabjerg, ‘‘A DDS-
Mach. Drives Conf. (IEMDC), Jun. 2003, pp. 1251–1257, doi: 10.1109/ based wait-free phase-continuous carrier frequency modulation strat-
IEMDC.2003.1210400. egy for EMI reduction in FPGA-based motor drive,’’ IEEE Trans.
[74] A. Lelkes, J. Krotsch, and R. W. D. Doncker, ‘‘Low-noise external Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 9619–9631, Oct. 2019, doi:
rotor BLDC motor for fan applications,’’ in Proc. Conf. Rec. IEEE Ind. 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2891572.
Appl. Conf. 37th IAS Annu. Meeting, Oct. 2002, pp. 2036–2042, doi: [94] F. Luo, X. Zhang, D. Boroyevich, P. Mattevelli, J. Xue, F. Wang, and
10.1109/IAS.2002.1043812. N. Gazel, ‘‘On discussion of AC and DC side EMI filters design for
[75] A. Sathyan, M. Krishnamurthy, N. Milivojevic, and A. Emadi, ‘‘A low- conducted noise suppression in DC-fed three phase motor drive system,’’
cost digital control scheme for brushless DC motor drives in domestic in Proc. 26th Annu. IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo. (APEC),
applications,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Electr. Mach. Drives Conf., May 2009, Mar. 2011, pp. 667–672.
pp. 76–82, doi: 10.1109/IEMDC.2009.5075186. [95] Z. Wang, K. T. Chau, and C. Liu, ‘‘Improvement of electromagnetic
[76] J. Sun, Y. Chai, C. Su, Z. Zhu, and X. Luo, ‘‘BLDC motor speed control compatibility of motor drives using chaotic PWM,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn.,
system fault diagnosis based on LRGF neural network and adaptive lifting vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2612–2614, Jun. 2007.
scheme,’’ Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 14, pp. 609–622, Jan. 2014. [96] Z. Zhu, D. Howe, E. Bolte, and B. Ackermann, ‘‘Instantaneous magnetic
[77] Y. Su, G. Fu, B. Wan, D. Zhang, and X. Ma, ‘‘Failure analysis of Hall- field distribution in brushless permanent magnet DC motors—Part I:
effect sensors in brushless DC starter/generator,’’ Eng. Failure Anal., Opencircuit field,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 124–135,
vol. 103, pp. 226–237, Sep. 2019. Jan. 1993.
[78] M. Aqil and J. Hur, ‘‘A direct redundancy approach to fault-tolerant [97] Z. Q. Zhu and D. Howe, ‘‘Instantaneous magnetic field distribu-
control of BLDC motor with a damaged Hall-effect sensor,’’ IEEE Trans. tion in brushless permanent magnet DC motors, part II: Armature-
Power Electron., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1732–1741, Feb. 2020. reaction field,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 136–142,
[79] S. M. Hosseini, F. Hosseini, and M. Abedi, ‘‘Stator fault diag- Jan. 1993.
nosis of a BLDC motor based on discrete wavelet analysis using [98] Z. Q. Zhu and D. Howe, ‘‘Instantaneous magnetic field distribution
Adams simulation,’’ Social Netw. Appl. Sci., vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1–13, in brushless permanent magnet DC motors. III. Effect of stator slot-
Oct. 2019. ting,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 143–151, Jan. 1993, doi:
[80] M. Ebadpour, N. Amiri, and J. Jatskevich, ‘‘Fast fault-tolerant con- 10.1109/20.195559.
trol for improved dynamic performance of hall-sensor-controlled brush- [99] Z. Zhu and D. Howe, ‘‘Instantaneous magnetic field distribution in
less DC motor drives,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 36, no. 12, permanent magnet brushless DC motors. IV. Magnetic field on load,’’
pp. 14051–14061, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2021.3084921. IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 152–158, Jan. 1993, doi:
[81] H. Park and Y. Suh, ‘‘Fault-tolerant control strategy for reduced 10.1109/20.195560.
torque ripple of independent twelve-phase BLDC motor drive sys- [100] B. S. Rahman and D. K. Lieu, ‘‘The origin of permanent magnet induced
tem under open-circuit faults,’’ in Proc. IEEE Energy Convers. Congr. vibration in electric machines,’’ J. Vibrat. Acoust., vol. 113, no. 4,
Expo. (ECCE), Oct. 2020, pp. 3370–3375, doi: 10.1109/ECCE44975. pp. 476–481, Oct. 1991.
2020.9235949. [101] G. Jiao and C. D. Rahn, ‘‘Field weakening for radial force reduction in
[82] H. Li, W. Li, and H. Ren, ‘‘Fault-tolerant inverter for high-speed brushless permanent-magnet DC motors,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 40,
low-inductance BLDC drives in aerospace applications,’’ IEEE Trans. no. 5, pp. 3286–3292, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2004.832989.
Power Electron., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2452–2463, Mar. 2017, doi: [102] J. Hur, J.-W. Reu, B.-W. Kim, and G.-H. Kang, ‘‘Vibration reduction
10.1109/TPEL.2016.2569611. of IPM-type BLDC motor using negative third harmonic elimination
[83] M. Villani, M. Tursini, G. Fabri, and L. Castellini, ‘‘High reliability method of air-gap flux density,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 47, no. 3,
permanent magnet brushless motor drive for aircraft application,’’ IEEE pp. 1300–1309, May 2011, doi: 10.1109/TIA.2011.2128850.
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2073–2081, May 2012, doi: [103] H. Hu, G. Cao, S. Huang, C. Wu, and Y. Peng, ‘‘Drive circuit-based
10.1109/TIE.2011.2160514. torque-ripple suppression method for single-phase BLDC fan motors
[84] T. Rahimi, L. Ding, S. Peyghami, M. Kheshti, F. Blaabjerg, and P. Davari, to reduce acoustic noise,’’ IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 13, no. 7,
‘‘Time domain simulation of a five-phase BLDC motor drive,’’ in Proc. pp. 881–888, Mar. 2019.
11th Power Electron., Drive Syst., Technol. Conf. (PEDSTC), Feb. 2020, [104] R. M. Pindoriya, A. K. Mishra, B. S. Rajpurohit, and R. Kumar, ‘‘An anal-
pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/PEDSTC49159.2020.9088430. ysis of vibration and acoustic noise of BLDC motor drive,’’ in Proc. IEEE
[85] C.-L. Jeong, Y.-K. Kim, and J. Hur, ‘‘Optimized design of PMSM with Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting (PESGM), Aug. 2018, pp. 1–5, doi:
hybrid-type permanent magnet for improving performance and reliabil- 10.1109/PESGM.2018.8585750.
ity,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 4692–4701, Sep. 2019. [105] L. Jianjun, X. Yongxiang, and Z. Jibin, ‘‘A study on the reduction of
[86] A. Boudouda, N. Boudjerda, M. Melit, B. Nekhoul, K. E. K. Drissi, vibration and acoustic noise for brushless DC motor,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf.
and K. Kerroum, ‘‘Optimized RPWM technique for a variable speed Electr. Mach. Syst., Oct. 2008, pp. 561–563.
drive using induction motor,’’ in Proc. Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat. [106] M. B. Trivedi and J. J. Patel, ‘‘A DSC—Based field oriented control of
(EMC Eur.), Sep. 2012, pp. 1–6. SPMSM to mitigate practical difficulties with low resolution sxIncremen-
[87] K. S. Kim, Y. G. Jung, and Y. C. Lim, ‘‘A new hybrid random PWM tal encoder,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Power, Energy, Inf. Commun.
scheme,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 192–200, (ICCPEIC), Apr. 2014, pp. 455–461.
Jan. 2009. [107] B. Wu, D. Xu, J. Ji, W. Zhao, and Q. Jiang, ‘‘Field-oriented control
[88] P.-S. Chen and Y.-S. Lai, ‘‘Effective EMI filter design method for three- and direct torque control for a five-phase fault-tolerant flux-switching
phase inverter based upon software noise separation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power permanent-magnet motor,’’ Chin. J. Electr. Eng., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 48–56,
Electron., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2797–2806, Nov. 2010. Dec. 2018.
[108] M. Sumega, P. Rafajdus, and M. Stulrajter, ‘‘Current harmonics controller [128] R. Ahmadi, H. Mahmoudi, and M. Aleenejad, ‘‘Torque ripple mini-
for reduction of acoustic noise, vibrations and torque ripple caused by mization for a permanent magnet synchronous motor using a modified
cogging torque in PM motors under FOC operation,’’ Energies, vol. 13, quasi-Z-source inverter,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 4,
no. 10, p. 2534, May 2020. pp. 3819–3830, Apr. 2019.
[109] A. G. de Castro, W. C. A. Pereira, T. E. P. de Almeida, [129] A. Das and A. K. Dhakar, ‘‘Z—Source inverter based permanent magnet
C. M. R. de Oliveira, J. R. B. de Almeida Monteiro, and brushless DC motor drive,’’ in Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen.
A. A. de Oliveira, ‘‘Improved finite control-set model-based direct Meeting, Jul. 2009, pp. 1–5.
power control of BLDC motor with reduced torque ripple,’’ IEEE Trans. [130] M. Shen, J. Wang, A. Joseph, F. Z. Peng, L. M. Tolbert, and D. J. Adams,
Ind. Appl., vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 4476–4484, Sep. 2018. ‘‘Constant boost control of the Z-source inverter to minimize current
[110] C. K. Lad and R. Chudaman, ‘‘Simple overlap angle control strategy ripple and voltage stress,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 42, no. 3,
for commutation torque ripple minimisation in BLDC motor drive,’’ IET pp. 770–778, May 2006.
Electr. Power Appl., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 797–807, Jul. 2018. [131] F. Z. Peng, M. Shen, and Z. Qian, ‘‘Maximum boost control of the Z-
[111] L. Romeral, A. Fabrega, J. Cusido, A. Garcia, and J. A. Ortega, ‘‘Torque source inverter,’’ in Proc. IEEE 35th Annu. Power Electron. Spec. Conf.,
ripple reduction in a PMSM driven by direct torque control,’’ in Proc. Jun. 2004, pp. 255–260.
IEEE Power Electron. Spec. Conf., Jun. 2008, pp. 4745–4751. [132] Z. Xu and M. F. Rahman, ‘‘Comparison of a sliding observer and
a Kalman filter for direct-torque-controlled IPM synchronous motor
[112] T. S. Singh and A. K. Jain, ‘‘Improved direct torque controlled IPM
drives,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 4179–4188,
synchronous motor using variable band 12 sector control in two level
Nov. 2012.
inverter,’’ in Proc. IEEE 6th Int. Conf. Power Syst. (ICPS), Mar. 2016,
[133] Z. Wang, Z. S. Xie, and Z. Guo, ‘‘A complex fuzzy controller for reducing
pp. 1–6.
torque ripple of brushless DC motor,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Comput.,
[113] S. S. Hakami, I. M. Alsofyani, and K.-B. Lee, ‘‘Torque ripple reduc-
Berlin, Germany: Springer, Sep. 2009, pp. 804–812.
tion and flux-droop minimization of DTC with improved interleaving [134] Z. Xiangjun and C. Boshi, ‘‘Influences of PWM mode on the current
CSFTC of IM fed by three-level NPC inverter,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, generated by BEMF of switch-off phase in control system of BLDC
pp. 184266–184275, 2019. motor,’’ in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Electr. Mach. Syst. (ICEMS), Aug. 2001,
[114] W. Jiang, P. Wang, Y. Ni, J. Wang, L. Wang, and Y. Liao, ‘‘Multimode pp. 579–582.
current hysteresis control for brushless DC motor in motor and generator [135] K. Basu, J. S. S. Prasad, and G. Narayanan, ‘‘Minimization of torque
state with commutation torque ripple reduction,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Elec- ripple in PWM AC drives,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 2,
tron., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 2975–2985, Apr. 2018. pp. 553–558, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2004391.
[115] T. Sheng, X. Wang, J. Zhang, and Z. Deng, ‘‘Torque-ripple mitigation [136] Z. Goryca, S. Różowicz, A. Różowicz, A. Pakosz, M. Leśko, and
for brushless DC machine drive system using one-cycle average torque H. Wachta, ‘‘Impact of selected methods of cogging torque reduction
control,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2114–2122, in multipolar permanent-magnet machines,’’ Energies, vol. 13, no. 22,
Apr. 2015. p. 6108, Nov. 2020.
[116] Y. Wei, Y. Xu, J. Zou, and Y. Li, ‘‘Current limit strategy for BLDC motor [137] O. Tosun, N. F. O. Serteller, and G. Yalcin, ‘‘Comprehensive design and
drive with minimized DC-link capacitor,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 51, optimization of brushless direct current motor for the desired operating
no. 5, pp. 3907–3913, Sep. 2015. conditions,’’ in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Electron., Jun. 2021, pp. 1–6, doi:
[117] Z.-S. Ho, C.-M. Uang, and P.-C. Wang, ‘‘Extracting DC bus current 10.1109/IEEECONF52705.2021.9467459.
information for optimal phase correction and current ripple in sensorless [138] A. Kumar, R. Gandhi, R. Wilson, and R. Roy, ‘‘Analysis of permanent
brushless DC motor drive,’’ J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. C, vol. 15, no. 4, magnet BLDC motor design with different slot type,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int.
pp. 312–320, Apr. 2014. Conf. Power Electron., Smart Grid Renew. Energy (PESGRE), Jan. 2020,
[118] G. Krishnan and K. T. Ajmal, ‘‘A neoteric method based on PWM ON pp. 1–6.
PWM scheme with buck converter for torque ripple minimization in [139] B. Gecer, O. Tosun, H. Apaydin, and N. F. Oyman Serteller,
BLDC drive,’’ in Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. Emerg. Res. Areas, Magn., Mach. ‘‘Comparative analysis of SRM, BLDC and induction motor using
Drives (AICERA/iCMMD), Jul. 2014, pp. 1–6. ANSYS/Maxwell,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Electr., Comput., Commun.
[119] Y. Lee and J. Kim, ‘‘A novel enhanced inverted PWM driving scheme Mechatronics Eng. (ICECCME), Oct. 2021, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ICEC-
for three-phase BLDC motor drive,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Consum. CME52200.2021.9591010.
Electron. Asia (ICCE-Asia), Jun. 2018, pp. 206–212. [140] M. Fazil and K. R. Rajagopal, ‘‘A novel air-gap profile of single-phase
[120] A. Azarudeen and D. Mary, ‘‘Performance analysis of conventional and permanent-magnet brushless DC motor for starting torque improvement
digital PWM control scheme for speed control of BLDC motor drives,’’ and cogging torque reduction,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 46, no. 11,
in Proc. Int. Conf. Adv. Electr. Technol. Green Energy (ICAETGT), pp. 3928–3932, Nov. 2010.
Sep. 2017, pp. 69–75. [141] S. M. Taher, A. H. Niasar, and S. A. Taher, ‘‘A new MPC-based approach
[121] K.-Y. Nam, W.-T. Lee, C.-M. Lee, and J.-P. Hong, ‘‘Reducing torque for torque ripple reduction in BLDC motor drive,’’ in Proc. 12th Power
ripple of brushless DC motor by varying input voltage,’’ IEEE Trans. Electron., Drive Syst., Technol. Conf. (PEDSTC), Feb. 2021, pp. 1–6.
[142] M. Masmoudi, B. El Badsi, and A. Masmoudi, ‘‘DTC of B4-inverter-
Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1307–1310, Apr. 2006.
fed BLDC motor drives with reduced torque ripple during sector-to-
[122] V. Viswanathan and S. Jeevananthan, ‘‘Hybrid converter topology for
sector commutations,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 9,
reducing torque ripple of BLDC motor,’’ IET Power Electron., vol. 10,
pp. 4855–4865, Sep. 2014.
no. 12, pp. 1572–1587, Oct. 2017.
[143] M. S. Patil, R. Medhane, and S. S. Dhamal, ‘‘Comparative analysis of
[123] D. Kumar, R. A. Gupta, and H. Tiwari, ‘‘Front-end zeta converter based various DTC control techniques on BLDC motor for electric vehicle,’’ in
BLDCM drive for efficient reduction of commutation current ripple using Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Smart Struct. Syst. (ICSSS), Jul. 2020, pp. 1–6, doi:
notch-filter,’’ Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 30, no. 9, Sep. 2020, 10.1109/ICSSS49621.2020.9201982.
Art. no. e12508, doi: 10.1002/2050-7038.12508. [144] J. Park and D.-H. Lee, ‘‘Simple commutation torque ripple reduction
[124] E. Çelik and N. Öztürk, ‘‘A new fuzzy logic estimator for reduction of using PWM with compensation voltage,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 56,
commutation current pulsation in brushless DC motor drives with three- no. 3, pp. 2654–2662, May 2020.
phase excitation,’’ Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 31, no. S2, pp. 1125–1134, [145] U. K. Soni and R. K. Tripathi, ‘‘BLDC motor specific PCOTLC converter
Jun. 2017. with active current wave shaping for torque ripple minimization,’’ in Proc.
[125] M. A. Khan, M. N. Uddin, and M. A. Rahman, ‘‘A new loss minimiza- IEEMA Engineer Infinite Conf. (eTechNxT), Mar. 2018, pp. 1–6.
tion control of interior permanent magnet motor drives operating with [146] M. N. Gujjar and P. Kumar, ‘‘Comparative analysis of field oriented con-
a wavelet based speed controller,’’ in Proc. IEEE Ind. Appl. Soc. Annu. trol of BLDC motor using SPWM and SVPWM techniques,’’ in Proc. 2nd
Meeting, Oct. 2011, pp. 1–8. IEEE Int. Conf. Recent Trends Electron., Inf. Commun. Technol. (RTE-
[126] M. P. Maharajan and S. A. E. Xavier, ‘‘Design of speed control and reduc- ICT), May 2017, pp. 924–929, doi: 10.1109/RTEICT.2017.8256733.
tion of torque ripple factor in BLdc motor using spider based controller,’’ [147] A. Bosso, C. Conficoni, D. Raggini, and A. Tilli, ‘‘A computational-
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 7826–7837, Aug. 2019. effective field-oriented control strategy for accurate and efficient elec-
[127] K. Xia, Y. Ye, J. Ni, Y. Wang, and P. Xu, ‘‘Model predictive control tric propulsion of unmanned aerial vehicles,’’ IEEE/ASME Trans.
method of torque ripple reduction for BLDC motor,’’ IEEE Trans. Magn., Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1501–1511, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1109/
vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2019.2950953. TMECH.2020.3022379.
[148] A. Bosso, C. Conficoni, D. Raggini, and A. Tilli, ‘‘A computational- RANJEEV ARULDAVID received the undergradu-
effective field-oriented control strategy for accurate and efficient elec- ate degree from the SRM Institute of Science and
tric propulsion of unmanned aerial vehicles,’’ IEEE/ASME Trans. Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, in 2021.
Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1501–1511, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1109/ He is currently pursuing his internship with the
TMECH.2020.3022379. E-Mobility Research Centre, Department of Elec-
[149] A. Khazaee, H. A. Zarchi, G. A. Markadeh, and H. M. Hesar, ‘‘MTPA trical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute
strategy for direct torque control of brushless DC motor drive,’’ IEEE of Science and Technology, under DST SERB
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 6692–6700, Aug. 2021.
Core Research Grant, File no.: CRG/2019/005483.
[150] M. S. Trivedi and R. K. Keshri, ‘‘Evaluation of predictive current control
His research interests include electric vehicle,
techniques for PM BLDC motor in stationary plane,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 8,
pp. 46217–46228, 2020. e-motor design, motor controllers, and power
[151] P. Mishra, A. Banerjee, and M. Ghosh, ‘‘FPGA-based real-time imple- converters for EVs.
mentation of quadral-duty Digital-PWM-Controlled permanent mag-
net BLDC drive,’’ IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 25, no. 3,
pp. 1456–1467, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2020.2977859. RAJESH VERMA received the B.E., M.E., and
[152] F. Naseri, E. Farjah, E. Schaltz, K. Lu, and N. Tashakor, ‘‘Predic- Ph.D. degrees in electronics and communication
tive control of low-cost three-phase four-switch inverter-fed drives engineering from MNNIT, Prayagraj, in 1994,
for brushless DC motor applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, 2001, and 2011, respectively. He has work expe-
Reg. Papers, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1308–1318, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/ rience of more than 20 years of teaching and
TCSI.2020.3043468.
administration at many reputed institutes in India,
[153] B. Chokkalingam, A. Yusuff, M. Tariq, and T. Bhekisiph, ‘‘Torque-
including MNNIT and many others. He also
ripple mitigation for BLDC using integrated converter connected
three-level T type NPC-MLI,’’ in Proc. Int. Conf. Electr., Elec- worked in telecom industry for four years at
tron. Comput. Eng. (UPCON), Nov. 2019, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/ New Delhi, India. He is an Associate Professor
UPCON47278.2019.8980096. with the Department of Electrical Engineering,
[154] M. Salehifar, M. Moreno-Eguilaz, G. Putrus, and P. Barras, ‘‘Sim- King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. His research interests include
plified fault tolerant finite control set model predictive control of computer networks, MAC protocols, wireless and mobile communication
a five-phase inverter supplying BLDC motor in electric vehicle systems, sensor networks, peer-to-peer networks, and M-2-M networks.
drive,’’ Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 132, pp. 56–66, Mar. 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.epsr.2015.10.030.
[155] M. Perotti, ‘‘On the influence of the load parasitics on the CM con- K. SATHIYASEKAR was born in Erode,
ducted EMI of BLDC motor drives,’’ in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Environ.
Tamil Nadu, India. He received the B.E. degree
Electr. Eng. IEEE Ind. Commercial Power Syst. Eur. (EEEIC/I&CPS
in electrical and electronics engineering from
Eur.), Jun. 2020, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/EEEIC/ICPSEurope49358.
2020.9160663. the University of Madras, in 1999, the M.Tech.
[156] E. Agamloh, A. von Jouanne, and A. Yokochi, ‘‘An overview of electric degree in high voltage engineering from SAS-
machine trends in modern electric vehicles,’’ Machines, vol. 8, no. 2, TRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, in 2002,
p. 20, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.3390/machines8020020. and the Ph.D. degree in high voltage engineering
[157] B. Sarlioglu, C. T. Morris, D. Han, and S. Li, ‘‘Benchmarking of electric from Anna University, Chennai, India, in 2010.
and hybrid vehicle electric machines, power electronics, and batteries,’’ He is currently a Professor with the Department
in Proc. Int. Aegean Conf. Electr. Mach. Power Electron. (ACEMP), Intl of Electronics and Communication Engineering,
Conf. Optim. Electr. Electron. Equip. (OPTIM) Int. Symp. Adv. Elec- Prathyusha Engineering College, Chennai. Under his guidance, 13 scholars
tromech. Motion Syst. (ELECTROMOTION), Sep. 2015, pp. 519–526. had completed their doctorate degree and eight others are currently pursuing
[158] BLDC Surface Mount. Accessed: May 21, 2022. [Online]. Avail- the Ph.D. degree with Anna University. He has been an Expert Member for
able: https://www.edn.com/brushless-dc-motors-part-i-construction-and- Ph.D. Viva-Voce Examination (University Nominee). He received a fund
operating-principles/ of Rs. 2.5 crores from the Ministry of MSME for Business Incubation
[159] [Online]. Available: https://www.alliedmotion.com/product-overview/ Cell and also received fund from MNRE, Government of India, for FDP
[160] [Online]. Available: https://www.kdedirect.com/blogs/news/90457923-
Program. He is an Editorial Board Member of the International Journal of
the-best-brushless-motors-for-heavy-lift
Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineer-
[161] [Online]. Available: https://www.electricalelibrary.com/en/2017/10/10/
brushless-motors/ ing. He received the Award of ‘‘Certificate of Outstanding Contribution in
[162] [Online]. Available: https://www.rt.com/usa/313081-shotgun-shell- Reviewing’’ from the International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy
drone-shooting/ Systems (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). He received the Best Paper
[163] Design Evaluation Including Sizing, Optimization, Efficiency Maps. Award at the International Conference on Digital Factory 2008, held at CIT,
Accessed: Jan. 9, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://emotorseng.com/ Coimbatore. He is a reviewer for reputed journals, such as IEEE, Elsevier,
recent-projects/ Technical Gazette, and Australian journals.
[164] Rotor Laminations. Accessed: Dec. 25, 2021. [Online]. Available:
http://www.jystator.com/hpr%E2%80%930_413_15.html/stator
ABDULWASA B. BARNAWI received the B.Sc.
degree in electrical power engineering from the
DEEPAK MOHANRAJ received the bachelor’s Yanbu Industrial College, the master’s degree in
degree (Hons.) in electrical and electronics engi- electrical engineering from the University of New
neering and the master’s degree in power electron- Haven, West Haven, CT, USA, and the Ph.D.
ics and drives from Anna University, in 2007 and degree in electrical engineering from the Depart-
2011, respectively. He is currently pursuing the ment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sci-
Ph.D. degree with the SRM Institute of Science ence, The University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
and Technology, Chennai, India. He has gained He is an Assistant Professor with the Department
11 years of teaching experience in engineering of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering,
colleges. Currently, he is doing his research work King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. His current research interests
with the E-Mobility Research Centre, Department include renewable energy integration, power systems planning, generation
of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and adequacy evaluation, energy management (applying priced-based demand
Technology. His research interests include electric vehicle, e-motor design, response strategies), smart grid, and dynamic electricity pricing such as time
motor controllers, and power converters for electric vehicles. of use (TOU), critical peak pricing (CPP), and real-time pricing (RTP).