0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views13 pages

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment On Economic Growth - Empirical Evidence From Algeria (1990 2021)

Uploaded by

ferieladim4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views13 pages

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment On Economic Growth - Empirical Evidence From Algeria (1990 2021)

Uploaded by

ferieladim4
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

P-ISSN: 2170-1040

Journal of Economic Papers E-ISSN: 2602-5426


Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023), P: 67 - 79

The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence


from Algeria (1990-2021)
Driss Amira 1 , Ouahrani Abdelkrim 2
1
Ain Temouchent University (Algeria), [email protected]
2
Ain Temouchent University (Algeria), [email protected]

Received: 12/12/2022 Accepted: 27/04/2023 Published: 20/05/2023

Abstract:
This study aims to investigate the impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth
in Algeria, based on annual data covering the period (1990-2021). To do this, we use the
Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) co-integration framework, including five variables, which
are Gross Domestic Product growth rate (GDPG), foreign direct investment (FDI), gross fixed
capital formation (GFCF), inflation as measured by the price index (CP), and the official exchange
rate (EXR). The results show the existence of a long-term co-integration relationship between the
variables, and a negative statistically significant impact of foreign direct impact of investment on
the economic growth rate in Algeria, as a result of the most of these investments being directed
towards the extractive sector.
Keywords: foreign direct investment, GDP growth, ARDL, Algeria.
JEL Classification: O33 C22 O4 N1

Corresponding author

67
Driss Amira, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic
Ouahrani Abdelkrim Growth: Empirical Evidence from Algeria (1990-2021)

1. Introduction:
The investigation into the factors that increase or hinder economic growth has been
one of the central debates amongst theoretical and empirical growth researchers. It is
regarded as fundamental requisite to economic development. There for Countries try to
formulate, reformulate, changing and improving several policies in order to achieve the real
growth. In fact the objective of every sovereign nation like Algeria is to promote economic
growth and economic development but the challenge is, what determine economic growth?
This question has been a challenging topic in all over the world. Many theoretical and
empirical researches have been conducted to seek to understand this issue for the purpose of
assisting governments in the formulation of plans and policies that can sufficiently bring
economic growth and so economic development.
Meny empirical researches prove that a Strong performance of financial sector has a
direct positive impact on economic growth since the efficiency of almost all macroeconomic
variables such as foreign direct investment. This prompted many countries, especially
developing countries, to search for foreign direct investment as one of the most important
strategic tools that could contribute to reviving the local economy, which increased intense
competition in attracting and stimulating foreign direct investment all over the world.
In Algeria where the financial sector is not strong enough, resulted to the very small
contribution of the foreign direct investment on the economic growth of a nation, prompting
her to carry out several radical economic and financial reforms; On the conditions for the
exercise of economic and financial activity by the government and economic operators, in
addition to the fiscal rules that aim to rationalize the tax and make it more simplified and
transparent, as well as providing total and partial exemptions to attract foreign direct
investment.
The fact that foreign direct investment is an important and vital element in economic
life through its contribution to the revival of the economic and investment sector, this study
came to examine the ability of the Algerian economy to attract foreign direct investment and
its contribution to raising the rate of economic growth, through the following main question
Have Foreign Direct Investment real effect on Algerian Economic Growth during
1990-2021 ?
2. Literature Review:
Several empirical studies have been conducted to explain how economic growth can
be attributed to Foreign Direct Investment; where most researchers focused on developing
countries which looked at the effective role that Foreign Direct Investment plays in the
economic life, as follow:
(Benanaya & Bakdi, 2017): This paper provides new approach to testing for the
existence of a relationship between foreign direct investment (FDI) and economic growth in
Algeria Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) co-integration framework, based
on annual data covering the period of 1980-2014. In order to verify the relationship between
Foreign Direct Investment and economic growth in Algeria ; The results suggest that FDI
have a positive impact on economic growth in the long-run. Proving that FDI can be
deemed to be catalysts for economic growth in Algeria where an increase in one unite in

68
Journal of Economic Papers Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023) P: 67 - 79

FDI leads to increase by 5% in GDP.


(Cherakrak & Gaham, 2020): The aim of this study is to analyze the Impact of
foreign direct investment on economic growth in Algeria over the period 1990-2018 Using
the Auto regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL). The study shows that in the short and long
run, FDI has a significant negative effect on growth in Algeria. This means that foreign
direct investment has a negative effect on the economic growth of Algeria. The study also
found that local capital and imports have a positive effect on the economic growth in
Algeria.
(Sarker & Khan, 2020): This study conducted an empirical analysis of the nexus
between FDI and GDP in Bangladesh. To explore the relationship between the two
variables, FDI and GDP this study used data series included annual data (in millions of U.S.
dollar) for both FDI and GDP covering the period from 1972 to 2017. Using augmented
ARDL bounds testing approach. The empirical results suggested that there was a long-run
relationship between GDP and FDI in Bangladesh. In addition, the error correction model
and Granger causality results indicated the presence of a unidirectional causality running
from GDP to FDI. Therefore, the findings of this study have some crucial policy
implications. The findings of the presence of short-run and long-run relationships and the
causality running from GDP (economic growth) to FDI advocate for placing greater
emphasis on policies that are appropriate to maintain a steady growth rate of GDP.
(Chaouachi & Balsalobre Lorente, 2022): This paper aiming to validate the
existence of an N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) relationship between the
ecological footprint and economic growth in Algeria during the period 1975–2014. The
proposed empirical model includes as additional explanatory variables the foreign direct
investment (FDI) and the electricity consumption. Through the ARDL econometric
approach, In the long run, the empirical results confirmed that the N-shaped EKC in Algeria
is valid; reveals that FDI contributes to reducing the negative impact of fossil sources in the
energy mix in Algeria through the transition to a cleaner energy mix pattern. These
empirical results evidence the necessity of establishing suitable policies after the gold
decade of the FDI in Algeria, being required to advance in this line to come-back to
ascending levels of FDI after the financial crisis of 2008 and the current COVID-19 crisis.
In this sense, policymakers should consider the advantages of FDI for promoting clean
foreign investment, necessary for reaching a transition to sustainable development in
Algeria.
3. The performance of foreign direct investment in Algeria:
Considering that foreign direct investment is an essential pillar of growth and
diversification strategies in all developing countries, as it is a source of financing and a
transmitter of knowledge, it has made the countries of the Middle East and North Africa
region struggle to attract foreign direct investment. This can be seen in the following figure

69
Driss Amira, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic
Ouahrani Abdelkrim Growth: Empirical Evidence from Algeria (1990-2021)

Figure 1. The inflows of foreign direct investment to MENA countries (2020):

Source: (Oxfordeconomics.com.)

Algeria is one of the developing countries that are working hard to improve its
investment climate, and attracting foreign investments is one of its development plans. The
following figure shows the percentage of foreign investment inflows and outflows during
the period (1990-2020):
Figure 2. The inflows and outflows of foreign direct investment to Algeria (1990-2020):

Source: prepared by the Authors.


Economic reforms led to an improvement in the investment climate, but they were not
sufficient. This is shown by the above curve, where it appears that the rate of FDI/GDP
inflows experienced many fluctuations, recording the largest rate in 2009, estimated at 2%.
After that, it declined due to the severe crisis in 2015 as a result of the decline in oil
rates, to rise again, reaching 0.78% in 2020, but it is always insufficient.
On the other hand, outflows of FDI can be considered null, where 2018 reached 0.48%
as the largest value.

70
Journal of Economic Papers Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023) P: 67 - 79

4. Methodology and Model Specification:


4.1 Data and Variables:
To estimate the impact of Foreign Direct Investment on economic growth in the
Algerian economy, after reviewing many empirical literature (Falki, 2009) (Shaikh &
Shaikh, 2012) we used an Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) co-integration
framework, based on annual data covering the period of 1990-2021, including five key
macroeconomic variables :
- Growth rate of gross domestic product (GDPG);
- foreign direct investment (FDI);
- gross fixed capital formation (GFCF);
- inflation rate measured by the price index (CP) that will allow us to monitor the
evolution of the price level;
- the official exchange rate (EXR).
The variables and the period of analysis obtained from the World Bank.
4.2 Model Selection:
Recently, A large number of studies have used an alternative cointegration technique
determine the long-term relationships between variables; known as the ‘Autoregressive
Distributed Lag (ARDL)’ bound test, introduced by Pesaran and Shin (1996;); Pesaran and
Pesaran (1997); Pesaran and Smith (1998) and Pesaran et al. (2001)
The ARDL “Auto Regressive Distributed Lag/ARDL” modeling is a combination
between AR autoregressive models (the models where among the explanatory
variables we find past values of the variable to be explained), and stepped delay models or
distributed lag DL (the models whose explanatory variables are: Xt and its past values).
(Benyakoub & Es-salmani, 2021, p. 4). This model has three main features:
• The first, is that the ARDL test can be applied if the sample size is small, unlike most
conventional co-integration tests that require that the sample size be large in order for the
results to be more efficient is relatively more efficient in the case of small and finite sample
data sizes. (Hakima, Adem, & Abbes, 2020, p. 45).
• The second, that approach can be applicable if running variables have ambiguous
order of integration i.e. purely I(0), purely I(1) or I(0) / I(1) which is not acceptable in
traditional approaches. However, it requires that the dependent variable is of I(1) in levels
and none of the explanatory variables is I(2) or higher). (Fatukasi, Olorunleke, Olajide, &
Alimi, 2015)
• Finally, with the ARDL approach it is possible that different variables have different
optimal numbers of lags (Pahlavan, Wilson, & Worthington, 2005, p. 8), and by applying the
ARDL technique we obtain unbiased estimates of the long-run model. (Belloumi, 2013, p.
10)
The ARDL model takes a sufficient number of time lags to obtain the best set of data
from the general frame model, and it also gives the best results for the parameters in the
long run, as it enables us to separate the effects of the short-term from the long-term, as it
enables to determine the integrity of the dependent variable and the independent variables in
the long and short run in the same equation, in addition to determining the size of the effect
of each of the independent variables on the dependent variable. The methodology used is

71
Driss Amira, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic
Ouahrani Abdelkrim Growth: Empirical Evidence from Algeria (1990-2021)

summarized in the following steps:


1. Order of Stationary of Series;
2. ARDL Model Estimation;
3. Bound Test;
4. Diagnostic Tests;
5. Parameters Stability Test.
5. Results analysis:
5.1 Order of Stationary of Series:
Many econometric studies (Stock & Watson, 1988) (C & Plosse, 1982) (J, 1991) (Yule,
1926) prove that time series of macroeconomic variables unstable resulting problem of
Spurious Regression, this is shown by the misleading results obtained where R2 values are
high even in the absence of a real relationship between the variables, and be sure of the
stability of variables The study based on the Unit Root Test by using test (ADF) Augmented

ADF
Intercept Trend and Intercept None
Variables Lag Decision
st st
Level 1 deff level 1 deff level 1stdeff
FDI 7 0.2110 ***0.0000 0.2072 ***0.0000 0.1931 ** 0.0000 I(1)
GDP G 7 0.2274 ***0.0000 0.1831 *** 0.0000 0.0516 *** 0.0000 I(1)
CP 7 0.4506 ***0.0001 0.6903 ***0.0004 0.1368 *** 0.0000 I(1)
EXR 7 0.8495 0.0058** 0.0575 **0.0306 0.9995 ***0.0042 I(1)
GFCF 7 0.1644 ***0.0000 0.2404 ***0.0000 0.4442 ***0.0000 I(1)
Dickey Fuller to test the stability of the time series so the null hypothesis is to contain the
variable of time series the unit root (it is not stable) and we judge this hypothesis by
observing the value of probability less than (0.05), it means that the calculated value of the
statistic (ADF) bigger than the tabular value, which means refused the null hypothesis
existence of unit root and stability of time series variables.
Table 1: ADF Unit Root Tests for variables
***, **, * Significant at levels 1%, 5%, 10%, successively.
Source: prepared by the Authors.
From the results obtained in the Table 1, shows that all economic variables except are not
stationary at level, where the absolute values was less than the critical value for all variables which
requires accepting the null hypothesis on the existence of a unit root, but after taking first difference
all the variables has become stable (stationary) at the abstract level 5%, in other words, all variables
are integrated of order I(1).
According to (Mamta, 2004), which sees that the (ADF) test is not able to distinguish well
the statics of time series, so the Philips–Perron test will be conducted, which is characterized by its
ability to give strong estimates in the case of series that have a series correlation and non-constant
variance.

72
Journal of Economic Papers Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023) P: 67 - 79

Table 2. PP Unit Root Tests for variables


PP
Intercept Trend and Intercept None Decisio
Variables
n
Level 1stdeff level 1stdeff Level 1stdeff
FDI 0.1934 ***0.0000 0.2082 ***0.0000 0.2671 ** 0.0000 I(1)
GDP G ***0048.0 // **0.0246 // **0.0322 // I(1)
CP 0.4697 ***0.0001 0.6732 ***0.0002 0.1354 *** 0.000 I(1)
EXR 0.8229 0.0063*** 0.7364 ***0.0334 ***0.9957 ***0.0057 I(1)
GFCF **0.0128 // 0.0582 ***0.0000 ***0.0048 // I(1)
***, **, * Significant at levels 1%, 5%, 10%, successively.
Source: prepared by the Authors.

From the results obtained in the Table 2, shows that all economic variables except
GDP growth and Gross Fixed Capital Formation are not stationary at level, where the
probability was greater than (0.05), which requires accepting the null hypothesis on the
existence of a unit root, but after taking first difference all the variables has become stable
(stationary) at the abstract level 5%, in other words, all variables are integrated of order I(1),
except GDP growth and Gross Fixed Capital Formation are stationary at level, where the
probability was less than (0.05) which integrated of order I(0).
Through the obtained results and considering that the variables are integrated at I (0)
and I (1), and considering that all the variables are not integrated at the second degree I (2),
the null hypothesis that the variables are not integrated can be rejected. Therefore, an
autoregressive lag time lag (ARDL) model will be used.
5.2 ARDL Model Estimation:
The appropriate lag order of variables should be determined before proceeding to the
ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration (Fatukasi, Olorunleke, Olajide, & Alimi,
2015). To visualize the optimal ARDL model, we extract the optimal lag graph according to
the Akaike information criteria (AIC). The model that offers the smallest AIC value will be
the best. In this case, ARDL (1 ,0,4,1,4) is the best.
Figure 2: Optimal lags
Akaike Information Criteria (top 20 models)
3.88

3.86

3.84

3.82

3.80

3.78

3.76

3.74
)

)
,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4
,1

,1

,2

,2

,4

,4

,1

,0

,1

,3

,2

,3

,1

,1

,2

,2

,1

,1

,2

,0
,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,3

,4

,4

,4

,4

,4

,3
,0

,1

,1

,0

,0

,1

,3

,0

,0

,0

,3

,1

,4

,0

,1

,4

,2

,1

,2

,0
(1

(1

(1

(1

(1

(1

(1

(1

(2

(1

(1

(1

(1

(1

(2

(1

(1

(2

(1

(1
L

L
D

D
R

R
A

Source: prepared by the Authors.

73
Driss Amira, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic
Ouahrani Abdelkrim Growth: Empirical Evidence from Algeria (1990-2021)

Table 3. Unrestricted ARDL Model


Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.*
GDPG (-1) -0.159188 0.264986 -0.600742 0.5592
FDI -2.80E-09 8.00E-10 -3.495519 0.0044
GFCF 0.217597 0.084198 2.584354 0.0239
GFCF (-1) 0.340862 0.082818 4.115799 0.0014
GFCF (-2) 0.264414 0.078911 3.350780 0.0058
GFCF (-3) 0.158111 0.074255 2.129291 0.0546
GFCF (-4) 0.112023 0.075702 1.479796 0.1647
CPI 0.060114 0.091310 0.658348 0.5227
CPI (-1) 0.125035 0.092800 1.347358 0.2028
EXR -0.258322 0.088402 -2.922145 0.0128
EXR (-1) 0.379786 0.116561 3.258258 0.0069
EXR (-2) -0.170354 0.098448 -1.730401 0.1092
EXR (-3) 0.165240 0.096570 1.711095 0.1128
EXR (-4) -0.147696 0.067460 -2.189381 0.0491
C 2.359469 2.874659 0.820782 0.4278
Prob(F-statistic)
0.005920
Adjusted R-squared
0.659145
Durbin-Watson stat
2.966586

Source: prepared by the Authors.


Table.3 reports the results of the unrestricted ARDL model. The adjusted R-squared
is 0.659145 which implies that 66% of the GDP change is explained by independent
variables, where the value of Fisher's probability value was 0.005920, which is less than
0.05 ; definitely rejects the null hypothesis that all regressors have zero coefficients for all
cases.
5.3 Bound Test:
Bounds approach testing the existence of a long-run level relationship between a
dependent variable and a set of regressors, The proposed tests are based on standard F- and
t-statistics used to test the significance of the lagged levels of the variables in a first-
difference regression. Two sets of asymptotic critical values are provided: one set assuming
that all the regressors are I(1) and another set assuming they are all I(0). These two sets of
critical values provide a band covering all possible classifications of the regressors into I(0),
I(1) or mutually cointegrated Accordingly, various bounds testing procedures are proposed.
This is a particularly relevant application as there is considerable doubt concerning the order
of integration of variables. (Pesaran, Shin, & Smith, 1999, p. 1).
The bounds test for cointegration involves the comparison of f-statistics against the
upper bound critical values I(1), and the lower bound critical values I(0), which are
extracted from pesaran and pesaran 1997. To check for the cointegration by applying bound
test using (1 ,0,4,1,4) model specification, the calculated f-statistic when export volume is
the dependent varible f=5.984325 is higher than the upper bound critical value at the 5%
significance level (tabele4). This suggests that the null hypothesis of no cointegration
cannot be accepted and that there exists cointegration relationship between variables.
74
Journal of Economic Papers Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023) P: 67 - 79

(Seema & Nayaran, 2004, p. 106). Therefore, there is a long-run relationship between the
GDPg and (FDI, CPI, GFCF, and EXR).
Table 4. ARDL Bounds Test
Test Statistic Value
F-Statistic 5.984325
Critical Value Bounds
Significance I(0) Bounds I(1) Bounds
10% 3.52 2.45
5% 4.01 2.86
2.5% 4.49 3.25
1% 5.06 3.74
Source: prepared by the Authors.

5.4 Diagnostic Tests:


Before estimating the long-run and short-run parameters, it is necessary to check for
diagnostic tests to avoid the misleading conclusion. These test is performed to evaluate the
robustness of our ARDL model the no serial correlation for no suffering from serial correlation. The
results of diagnostic tests are reported in table 5. Also, Figure02 improve that there is no serial
correlation.
Table 5. Diagnostic Tests
Test F statistics (p-values) Results
Serial Correlation: 2.272059
Breusch-Godfrey LM Test No serial correlation
0. 4503
Source: prepared by the Authors.
5.5 Parameters Stability Test:
After making sure that there is no correlation between the residuals, it is also necessary to
check the stability of the model because, the existence of a co-integration relationship between the
variables does not necessarily mean that the estimated coefficients are stable.
Figure 4: CUSUM tests
15

10

-5

-10

-15
96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20

CUSUM 5% Signific ance

Source: prepared by the Authors.


Through what was estimated in the above figure (3), and since the CUSUM line (the continuous
line) is located between the two dashed lines or the confidence limits, the model is characterized by
stability over time at a significant level of 5%, which confirms that the estimated parameters are
stable throughout the study period, which allows for the next step.
75
Driss Amira, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic
Ouahrani Abdelkrim Growth: Empirical Evidence from Algeria (1990-2021)

Long –Run and Short-Run Dynamics:


In macroeconomics study, we give more importance to the long-run effects than those of the
short-run. For this reason, we give a huge value in our study to the long-run relationship
interpretation (Taallah & Chine, 2020, p. 7). The bound test finds long-run relationship between the
GDPG and (FDI, GFCF, CPI and EXR). Therefore, long-run parameters are estimated and
presented in Table 7.

Table 6. Short Run Dynamic


Variables Coefficient
-0.000000
D (FDI)
0.0044
-0.112023
D(GFCF)
0.1647
0.060114
D(CPI)
0.5227
0.147696
D(EXR)
0.0491
-1.159188
CointEq(-1)
0.0009
Source: prepared by the Authors.
The results of the short-run model (presented in table 6) show that the error correction
coefficient CointEq (-1) is negative and significant at 5% level, so there is an error correction
mechanism. The CointEq coefficient -1.159188 implies that deviations from the long-term growth
rate in GDP are corrected by 1.16% (that mean the speed of adjustment is 11.6 %). where (FDI)
have a negative and significant effect on economic growth in the short run, and (GFCF) have a
negative and no-significant effect on economic growth in the short run. In parallel, (CPI) have a
positive and no-significant effect on economic growth in the short run, and (EXR) have a positive
and no-significant effect on economic growth in the short run.
Table 7. Long Run Dynamic
Cointeq = GDPG - (-0.0000*FDI + 0.9429 *GFCF + 0.1597*CP -0.0270*EXR + 2.0354)
Variables Coefficient
-0.000000
FDI
0.0009
0.942907
GFCF
0.0003
0.159723
CPI
0.0925
-0.027042
EXR
0.2111
Source: prepared by the Authors.
On the other hand, this correction rate expresses the speed of adjustment towards equilibrium,
in the sense that the growth rate of output takes approximately 4 years to reach its equilibrium value
after the impact of any shock in the system (the model) as a result of the change in the independent
variables. From the results shown in Table (06) according to the reference of the estimated
parameters, it is noted that there is a positive and statistically significant effect of gross fixed capital
formation on the rate of economic growth in the long run, while foreign direct investment notes that

76
Journal of Economic Papers Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023) P: 67 - 79

there is a negative, non-existent effect on economic growth in the long run, However, the effect was
weak and the resilience was low.
5.6 The Ramsey RESET Test:
In statistics, the Ramsey Regression Equation Specification Error Test (RESET) test is a
general specification test for the linear regression model. More specifically, it tests whether non-
linear combinations of the fitted values help explain the response variable. The intuition behind the
test is that if non-linear combinations of the explanatory variables have any power in explaining the
response variable, the model is misspecified in the sense that the data generating process might be
better approximated by a polynomial or another non-linear functional form.
Table 8. Ramsey (RESET) test
Vlue df Prob
t-statistic 0.378013 11 0.7126
F-statistic 0.142893 (1, 11) 0.7126
Source: prepared by the Authors.
Table 8 showed that the probability of the F test is greater than 5%, which proves the
validity and appropriateness of the functional form used in the estimate.
6. Conclusion:
This study worked on the impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in
the Algerian economy, during the period 1990-2021, and the study found:
- According to the estimation results of the ARDL model, as it appears that fisher
probability is 0.005920, which is less than 5%, indicates the quality of the model and the
ability of the independent variables to explain the dependent variable where The adjusted R-
squared was 65.91which implies that 65.91%, proved that the independent variables
(foreign direct investment (FDI), gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), and inflation rate as
measured by Prices (CP) and the official exchange rate (EXR).) were able to explain the
dependent variable, which is economic growth.
- The ARDL test showed a significant negative impact of foreign direct investment on
the rate of economic growth in the short and long term, which was contrary to expectations.
The majority of foreign investments inflow into the Algerian economy are directed to the
hydrocarbons sector, and this led to a significant negative impact on the Algerian economy
and its structure, especially in recent periods as a result of the conflicting events that the
entire world experienced.
- It also showed from the study that the total fixed capital formation had a significant
positive effect for the short and long term, consistent with expectations, due to the great
attention given by Algeria to improve its infrastructure, but it neglected the investment
aspect that attracts foreign direct investments (acquisition of machinery and equipment,
commercial and industrial buildings...etc).
Based on the findings of the research, the researcher came up with a set of suggestions
and recommendations :
o Directing foreign direct investment inflows outside the hydrocarbon sector to avoid
economic concentration.
o Work to remove economic and political obstacles that limit the flow of foreign direct
investment to Algeria, given its active role in providing production sources that are not

77
Driss Amira, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic
Ouahrani Abdelkrim Growth: Empirical Evidence from Algeria (1990-2021)

available locally.
o Enhancing the rules and foundations on which the investment environment is based,
to attract foreign direct investment.
6. References:
1. C, N., & Plosse, C. (1982). Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence
and Implications. Journal of Money Economics , 10.
2. Fatukasi, B., Olorunleke, G. K., Olajide, G. F., & Alimi, R. S. (2015). Bounds Testing Approaches to the
Analysis of Macroeconomic Relationships In Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management ,
7 (8), 26-34.
3. Hakima, L., Adem, H., & Abbes, B. E. (2020). Investment in education and economic growth : ARDL
Model. Economic Sciences, Management and Commercial Sciences review , 13 (2), 39-50.
4. J, M. J. (1991). Critical Values for Co integration Test in Long-Run Relationships: Reading in Co
integration . Oxford University Press , 267-276.
5. Mamta, C. (2004). Currency Crisis and Stock Prices in East Asian Countries:an Applicatin of
Cointegratin Granger Causality. School of Economics and Finance .
6. Pahlavan, M., Wilson, E., & Worthington, A. C. (2005). Trade-GDP Nexus in Ir ade-GDP Nexus in Iran:
An Application of the A an: An Application of the Autoregressive Distributed e Distributed Lag (ARDL)
Model . e Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons , 1-23.
7. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (1999). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Long-run
Relationships. Edinburgh School of Economics , 1-26.
8. Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1988). Testing for Common Trends. ournal of American Statistical
Association , 83.
9. Taallah, L., & Chine, L. (2020). Total Factor Productivity and Sources of Economic Growth in Algeria
(1970-2018) by Uusing ARDL Approach. Revue des Réformes Economiques et Intégration En Economie
Mondiale , 14 (03), 1-11.
10. Yule, G. (1926). Why Do We Some Times Get Nonsense-Correlations Between Time-Series? A Study
in Sampling and the Nature of Time-Series. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , 89.

11. Benanaya, D., & Bakdi, M. (2017). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Algeria: An
Application of Auto- Regressive Distributed LAG (ARDL) Bounds Testing Approach. El-Bahith
Review, 17(1), 19-29.

12. Chaouachi, M., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2022). Environmental strategies for achieving a new foreign
direct investment golden decade in Algeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 37660–
37675.
13. Cherakrak, S., & Gaham, W. (2020). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Algeria During
the period 1990-2018-An application of the autoregressive distributed lag model(ARDL). Algerian
Review of economic development, 7(1), 451-460.
14. Sarker, B., & Khan, F. (2020). Nexus between foreign direct investment and economic growth in
Bangladesh: an augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds testing approach. Financial Innovation,
6(10), 1-18.
15. Shaikh, N. A., & Shaikh, S. (2012). Impact of FDI, Capital Formation and International Trade on
Economic Growth of Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary
Research in Business, 3(11).
78
Journal of Economic Papers Volume : 14 – Issue : 01 (2023) P: 67 - 79

16. Falki, N. (2009). Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in Pakistan. International
Review of Business Research Papers,, 5(5), 110-120.
17. Belloumi, M. (2013). The relationship between Trade, FDI and Economic growth in Tunisia: An
application of autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Systems , 269–287.

79

You might also like