Control of A Grid-Connected Variable Speed WECS Based On An Induction Generator Fed by A Matrix Converter
Control of A Grid-Connected Variable Speed WECS Based On An Induction Generator Fed by A Matrix Converter
55
relationship is obtained as [3]:
Ii = -3 L
T -
~omi + 10 m
TC-d] (5)
2
The demanded values of md and fFfi are calculated as:
Input * -c*
Grid
_* V _* V
filter
md = o- m· =o- (6)
3-c 1 3v- c
vif if
where the vectors vo,io are the output voltage and output
current respectively; the vectors Vi' Ii are the input voltage
and input current respectively. In (6) "c" stands for complex
conjugated and V o * is the reference output voltage used by
Variable Speed the modulation algorithm. In Fig. 2, V o * is the output of the
Wind Turbine current controllers (i.e. V o *=Vds *+jvqs * ).
Fig. 2. Control system proposed.
The small signal models of (4-5) are obtained as:
56
using (14) in (13) assuming Mni* = ~mi ' ~m; = ~d; and Therefore for a disturbance Ltv; a current Lti is produced. If
!j is zero and assuming that the d-q components of the
considering VilFVO/g yields:
voltages and currents in the input filter are decoupled, then
-.- q2 [_ c
~li=-2V 10 +1 0 ~vif
-c] (15)
the equivalent resistance in the d-q axis can be calculated as:
o R eq d =- - - -1- - -
Defining Yo(mo}=1/Vo as the equivalent admittance connected - q2 Re(Yo(mo»
at the MC output, in d-q components (15) can be written as: (20)
Req q =- - -1- - -
Mid =_q2 Re[Yo({Oo)]~ - q2 Re(Yo (mo»
ST f +1
(16)
q Re Yo (mo ) -~vi
2 [ ] Therefore for the matrix converter operating at unity power
A •
uliq = --
factor there is always a negative resistance in either the d or q
ST f +1
axis (see (16». Therefore the proposed WECS can become
In (15) some digital effects have been neglected. For instance
unstable when the matrix converter is feeding a relatively
the dynamic effects of the zero order hold and the time delay
large load at the output.
produced because the duty cycles calculated in a given
To increase the stability, the synchronous rotating filter is
sampling time are used in the next processing cycle. These
used. For instance, if !j ~ 00, then the resistance calculated
effects can be important when the switching frequency is low.
The digital effects can be easily considered if the values of from (16,20) is a large value (i.e. Req~CX) and the WECS is
stable in the whole operating range. However, to use a very
md* and mi* are calculated as:
high value of 'J is not appropriate because in this case the
,_~ D
Grid
-----R.;----------
Model
~""H~~t"pc"~ L L__
-- __
- __
- __...--_---J
-_
3<1>
Input
Cage
Cage
induction
Motor
Generator
Fig. 4. Single phase models of the proposed WECS considering a strong grid.
Fig. 5. The experimental system.
57
From the wind turbine model the rotational speed of the Fig. 7 shows the real rotational speed, the estimated rotational
WECS generator, m,.*, is calculated in each sampling time. speed and the speed error. For this test a standard MRAS
The driving ac motor forces the induction machine rotational observer similar to that presented in [5-6] is implemented.
speed to this value. With this emulation technique the cage The sensorless performance of the proposed WECS, based on
machine rotates at the same speed as that of a generator a matrix converter is quite good even when the wind turbine
driven by a real wind turbine. A complete discussion of the inertia has been reduced to 1kgm2, which is less than a half
emulation technique can be found in [9]. the inertia of a wind turbine of this size [5]. As shown in Fig.
The matrix converter is controlled using the SVM 7b, for this test the speed error is less than 2% for the whole
algorithm presented in [3]. A switching frequency of 12.5kHz wind profile.
is used to control the bidirectional switches. The matrix For the experimental test shown in Figs. 6-7, the cut-off
converter is controlled from a DSP and FPGA-based external frequency of the synchronous rotating filter has been adjusted
hardware. The commutation is controlled using the four-step to ~50Hz to achieve a good performance. In order to test the
method implemented in the FPGA [1]. A speed encoder of system stability, the cage machine is operated at 1150rpm,
10,000 pulses per revolution is used for comparison with a steady state torque current of 6A.The generated power
purposes and for the control of the ac machine. The MC is about 1.5kW. The cut-off frequency of the synchronous
input filter is implemented using a inductor of 0.625mH, a rotating filter is varied from 20Hz to 3000Hz in 6s. Fig. 8
delta connected capacitor of 2J.lF and a parallel resistor of shows the experimental results obtained in this test.
lOOn. The experimental prototype is rated at about 2.5kW. In Fig. 8a the variation of the cut-off frequency is shown.
Fig. 6 shows the performance of the proposed system when Fig. 8b shown the matrix converter input current. When the
the wind profile of Fig. 6a is used in the wind turbine cut-off frequency is increased, the damping coefficient of (18)
emulator. Fig. 6b, shows the power generated by the wind is reduced, and the oscillations in the input current increases.
turbine when the torque current of the cage machine is When the cut-off frequency of the rotating filter is ~1000Hz,
regulated according to (3). The performance of the matrix the system is unstable and the overcurrent protection trips.
converter based WECS is good, similar to that obtained from Fig. 8c shows the voltage transfer ratio q. Again, when the
a WECS implemented using back to back converters [5]. cut-off frequency increases, the oscillations in the voltage
Fig. 6c shows the d-q axis machine currents (ids, iqs ) and the transfer ratio q increases until the system becomes unstable.
power component of the matrix input current (idi ). As stated in Fig. 9 shows the instantaneous matrix converter input
Section 2, the direct current is regulated to a constant value current, in steady state operation, considering two cut-off
and the matrix converter input current is proportional to the frequencies. Fig. 9a shows the current for Ie =20Hz. In this
cube of the rotational speed for driving the WECS to the point case the damping coefficient of (18) is high and the input
of maximum aerodynamic efficiency (see (1)). current waveform is good without much distortion. Fig. 9b
shows the MC input current waveform, for the system close
to unstable operation. In this case the matrix converter input
--g
14
~ -1000
~ ]
o
1000
£ -2000
'E
~ 800
10 20 30 40 50 60 o 10 20 30 40 50 60
$
5
~
5
~------------..- --....- ......
........... ~ 1.5
Time(s)
.----,..----,..----~--~--~-----.
u
C'"
0
g
Q)
0.5
-6 -5 ~
Q)
0
& -0.5
r./)
-1
10 20 30 40 50 60 -1.5 '----_ _.L...-_ _.L...-_ _.L...-_ _.L...-_ _. l - _ - - - '
Time (s) o 10 20 30 40 50 60
Fig. 6. Experimental results using a wind turbine emulator. a) Wind profile Time(s)
used in the test. b) Output power of the system. c) d-q stator currents and Fig. 7. a) Rotational speeds corresponding to the test of Fig 6. b) Speed
matrix converter input current idi . error.
58
3000 profiles of relatively high variabili~. For all the tests the
,-.. performance of the proposed WECS has been excellent.
::t 2000
'-"
~u 1000 Acknowledgements
(a)
0
,-..
0 2 3 4 5 6 This work has been funded by Fondecyt Chile, contract
5 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N~ 1060498.Thes~portofilieUn~~~~ofMagallan~~
<
'-"
I also acknowledged.
=t::
(!)
~
0
(b)
U
~
-5
'-" References
~
=
~
-10
0 2 3 4 5 6
1
[1] Wheeler, P.W., Rodriguez, J., Clare, J.C., Empringham,
L., Weinstein, A., "Matrix converters: a technology review",
0.8 IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 49, Nr. 2,
0.6
(c) pp. 276 - 288, April 2002.
cr
0.4 [2] A. Alesina and M. G. B. Venturini, "Analysis and design
of optimum amplitude nine-switch direct AC-AC
0.2
0 2 3 4 5 6 converters," IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 4, pp. 101-
Time (s) 112, Jan. 1989.
[3] Casadei, D.; Serra, G.; Tani, A.; Zarri, L., "Matrix
Fig. 8. Experimental results showing the variation of the cut-off frequency of
converter modulation strategies: a new general approach
the synchronous rotating filter. a) Cut-off frequency fc in Hz. b) MC input based on space-vector representation of the switch state",
current. c) Voltage transfer ratio q. IEEE Trans. On Industrial Electronics, Vol. 49, Nr. 2, pp.
370-381, April 2002.
[4] P. Wheeler, J. Clare, D. Lampard, S. Pickering, K.
Bradley, L. Empringham, "An Integrated 30kW Matrix
Converter based Induction Motor Drive", Proceedings of
$ IEEE Power Electronics Specialist Conference, PESC05,
=
(1)
~ -1
Recife Brazil, June 2005.
U [5] R. Cardenas, R. Pefia, "Sensorless Vector Control of
Induction Machines for Variable Speed Wind Energy
-3
Applications", IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion,
-5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Vol. 19, Nr. 1, pp. 196-205, March 2004.
Time (ms) [6] C. Schauder, 'IoAdaptive Speed Identification for Vector
6 Control of Induction Motors without Rotational Transducers",
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 28, Nr. 5,
pp. 1054-1061, October 1992.
$2 [7] W. Leonhard, "Control of electrical drives", Springer-
=(1)
t::
::s
Verlage, Berlin 1985.
U [8] Mirecki A., Roboam X., Richardeau F.," Architecture
-2 Complexity and Energy Efficiency of Small Wind Turbines",
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 54, Nr. 1,
-6 pp.660-670, Feb. 2007.
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
[9] R. Cardenas, R. Pefia, G. Asher, and J. Clare, "Emulation
Time (ms)
of wind turbines and flywheels for experimental purposes," in
Fig. 9. Experimental results showing the instantaneous input current. a) MC
input current for a cut-off frequency of 20Hz. b) MC input current for a cut- Proc. Eur. Power Electron. Conf., Graz, Austria, Aug. 2001.
off frequency close to 1000Hz.
59