Data Support And Structure
Data Support And Structure
In other words, the expert is fully responsible for the definition of the
4.
CBR sys- tem’s vocabulary knowledge. In this section we want to
show how a little of this knowledge implicitly encoded into the domain
vocabulary can be exploited to support the learning of similarity
measures. We focus on two specific forms of symbolic data types
whose domains can be organised in a structured way: taxonomic
symbolic and ordered symbolic data types.
21. One of our goal is to have a data model that can be used to support
a rule based language with object-oriented flavors. Meta variables
hide the structural difference between type and its subtypes, thus
clear the way for the unification algo rithm, which, at current form,
can not handle predicates with different numbers of arguments.
Through meta variables, a type and its subtypes have the same
structure at a higher level, which makes inheritance staightforward.
Our first experiment with InterSect shows that the extended hypertext
22.
data model can support both the modelling of the application and the
hypertext structure of instances. We benefit from the mechanisms of
the object oriented datanbase management sys tem, especially the
version mechanism and complex entity type definition mechanism.
We are following this experimental approach because we would like
to find out practically how object oriented database can support
hypertext systems and how such a combination can be used as a
solution to solve some of the problems of the next generation
hypermedia systems pro posed by Halasz[2].
23. A key enabler for the Semantic Web is online onto- logical support for
data, information and knowledge exchange. Given the exponential
growth of the infor- mation available online, automatic processing is
vital to the task of managing and maintaining access to that
information. Used to describe the structure and seman- tics of
information exchange, ontologies are seen to play a key role in areas
such as knowledge management, B2B e-commerce and other such
burgeoning electronic initiatives.
document ontology2.pdf
34. On the implementation side, the hybrid KEE system's frame con cept
supports object-oriented programming, while it's rule based
component allows navigation across explicitly repre sented
relationships between objects. Concluding: in this phase an
application domain expert builts up a structurally object-oriented
model of the application domain, starting from the basis of database
information given. The formal frame for this building up process is
given in the notation of Predicate/ Transition Nets ( Pr/T nets) ([6, 7]).
43. statements for a single request. The semantics of interac tive queries
can be better supported by allowing a certain kind of abstraction from
the specific object structures.
Goals. According to the scenario above, and the fact that there is still
46.
a lack of frameworks for comprehensive representa tion of medical
knowledge supporting diagnosis (see below), we developed a
medical knowledge base which provides structures to represent the
entire medical knowl edge, regardless of the original diagnostic
problem domain, supports not only the static description of diseases,
symp toms, etc., but also the process of medical diagnosis ( Le.
access by symptoms, diseases, signs, etc.), and takes into account
severa.! entry points for a variety of med ical tasks, which have to be
presented to the user by an appropriate user interface.
58. Figure 5: eoA UTHOR 1001 To support the annotation phase of the
group model, the tool provides menu items for attaching positive or
negative comments to objects (ideas, structures etc.) or relations and
for introducing alternatives to existing objects. Each comment
consists of a brief description (the label of the comment object when
it is displayed within the tool) and possibly some existing document
which contains a more elaborated version of the comment.
Since they do not provide concepts which are genera. lly applicable
61.
for medical decision support, we had to develop knowiledge
structures which a. llow to represent general, Le. case-independent
medical knowl edge (as it can be found in a medical text book) for
diagnostic support.
80. Effective support of the create, classify, and store activities in the
office en- vironment therefore needs to consider structures and
models for classification and furthermore provide unobtrusive and
pro-active support as much as pos- sible which is integrated in the
office environment. As a consequence, current research focuses on
means to take away the burden of annotating information and to
provide pro-active and just-in-time information delivery. Therefore,
our research department investigates the use of process enactment
by workflows to retrieve the workflow context for and to realize
proactive and context-sensitive support.
82. Sources Bidding tool Knowledge base CRM tool Reference tool
Project Management Portal References Customer requirements and
value proposition Service offering costs Product and service offering
sheets Solution structure Information support Project plan, Templates
for delivery and business model Reports and risk escalation chart
Document generation E-Mail push Pull Push Pull Pull Proposal
Process Initiate proposal project and draft proposal components
Develop proposal components Prepare illustrations (demos,
prototypes, references) Analyze risks, produce reports Produce
proposal Verify proposal Get offer approval Draft proposal document
Customer request for proposal ( RFP)
Generating_Relational_Database.pdf
During the last years, the TABA Workstation also evolved to comply
87.
with the different levels of capability maturity models of software
organizations. The CASE tools integrated in the environments offer
automated support to: (i) adaptation of the organization standard
processes for a specific project; (ii) definition of the organizational
structure [9]; (iii) acquisition, filtering, packaging and dissemination of
organizational knowledge [7]; (iv) planning the organization of
specific projects; (v) time, costs, risks, human resources planning,
monitoring and control [9, 10]; (vi) planning and execution. of
Configuration Management activities; (vii) identification of software
product quality requirements; (viii) documentation planning; (ix)
planning and monitoring of corrective actions; (x) measurement and
analysis activities based on the GQM method; (xi) project monitoring
through the generation of periodic reports and measures; (xii)
controlling of the activities executed during a specific project; (xiii)
requirements management; and (xiv) post mortem.