0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views20 pages

LECTURE NO9

Uploaded by

17bnciv0960
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views20 pages

LECTURE NO9

Uploaded by

17bnciv0960
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Traffic Terms and Concepts

Why do we need to concern ourselves with traffic


when we design pavements?
Traffic is what LOADS the pavement
 Traffic loads are cyclic (repetitious)
 Repeated, cyclic loads on a structure eventually result
in structural fatigue
 We see the result of this fatigue as pavement
damage or distress
Concept of load equivalency and
standard unit load/configuration used
in pavement design technology.

 heavy vehicles cause damage to pavements


 the heavier the load per axle, the more damage
 in order to assess the damage caused by the many
different types/configurations of vehicles, one specific
load/configuration has been adopted as the standard
• The standard adopted is the 18,000 lb single
axle load, a truck with a single rear axle
• the rear wheels each transmit 9000 lb loads to
the pavement

9000 lb

9000 lb
18,000 lb = 80 kN
 a load equivalency factor gives the number of
repetitions of the standard load/configuration that
would cause an equivalent amount of damage as one
pass of the specific vehicle;
 e.g., a load equivalency factor of 2.5 means that…

one pass of a causes an equivalent


specific vehicle amount of damage as
two and a half passes
of the standard
vehicle
a) ESAL
b) ITN
c) DTN
a) the standard load and axle configuration to which
all other load and axle configurations are converted
when evaluating traffic loads for pavement structural
design
ESAL = Equivalent Single Axle Load
9000 lb
9000 lb
ITN (Initial Traffic Number)
 the average number of ESAL's/day in the first
year of a pavement design analysis period

DTN (Design Traffic Number)


 the average number of ESAL's/day over the
entire pavement design analysis period
 The total ESAL applications over the design
analysis period divided by the number of traffic
days
 e.g., 6,000,000 ESAL’s over 20 years = 300,000
ESAL’s per year or 1,000 ESAL’s per day for 300
truck days per year (i.e., DTN = 1000)
Load distribution through the pavement
structure
Typical assumptions:
Higher strength
materials needed Multilayered elastic system
Subbase, base course, AC surface
is infinite in the horizontal direction
Subgrade is infinite in the vertical
and horizontal direction
Contain both the horizontal and vertical
strains below the set values that will cause
excessive cracking
These criteria are considered in terms of
repeated load applications because the
accumulated repetitions of traffic loads are of
significant importance to the development of
cracks and permanent deformation of the
pavement.
Estimating accumulated wheel load
repetitions
Traffic Characteristics: The traffic characteristics are determined in
terms of the number of repetitions of an 18,000-lb (80 kilo-newtons (kN))
single-axle load applied to the pavement on two sets of dual tires.

Equivalent single-axle load (ESAL)


Tire contact area (each Premise: “the effect of any
4.51in. (11 cm) radius) load on the performance of a
and 13.57 (33 cm) in apart pavement can be represented
Contact pressure of 70 in terms of the number of
lb/in2 single applications of an
18,000-lb single axle.

4 tires x  x 4.512 = 255.601 in2, Total single-axle load = 255.601 x 70


lb/in2 = 17,892 approximately 18,000 lbs.
Load equivalency factors (Table 20.3): Use this if
you know axle loads

Obviously the traffic mix (cars, buses, SU trucks, semis, etc.) must be
known because their gross axle loads are different.  Vehicle
classification counts are needed. Also needed is axle load data – the
reason for having truck weighing stations on major highways.
How to estimate the traffic mix if field data are not available
(In this case axle loads data must be available).
Table 20.4 can help you estimate break-down of truck
types in percentages.

%
How to estimate ESAL if axle loads are
not known
The equivalent 18,000-lb loads can also be determined from
the vehicle type, if the axle load is unknown, by using a truck
factor for that vehicle type. The truck factor is defined as the
number of 18,000-lb single-load applications caused by a
single passage of a vehicle.

truck _ factor 
(number _ of _ axles load _ equivalency _ factor )
number _ of _ vehicles

Table 20.5 gives truck factors, that is, they were computed
based on previous research data. Remember this formula as
the definition of the truck factor. You may not actually
compute it unless you are determining typical truck factors
for your study area. Problem 20-4 let you use this formula.
Distribution of truck factors for different
classes of highways and vehicles

Example: For rural interstates, one single truck is considered to have 0.52 ESAL. Count
the total number of trucks and multiply it by 0.52 to find total ESAL for that section.
Determining the accumulated ESAL
Must know: Design period, traffic growth rate, and design lane factor.
Usually a 20-year design period is used. Traffic growth rates can be
obtained from the planning division of the State DOT.

fd
Design lane factor: Pavement design
is done for the highest loading case
(design lane). Typically the outer lane
is subject to the highest loading.

G jt
Growth factor for a given growth
rate j and design period t
Determining accumulated ESAL when
axle loads are used

ESALi f d G jt AADTi 365 Ni FEi

ESALi = equivalent accumulated 18,000-lb (80kN) single-axle load for


the axle category i
fd = design lane factor
Gjt = growth factor for a given growth rate j and design period t
AADTi = first year annual average daily traffic for axle category i
Ni = number of axles on each vehicle in axle category i
FEi = load equivalency factor for axle category i

Note that AADT used here is the total for both directions.
Determining accumulated ESAL when
truck factors are used
ESALi f d G jt AADTi 365 f i
ESALi = equivalent accumulated 18,000-lb axle load for truck category i
fd = design lane factor
Gjt = growth factor for a given growth rate j and design period t
AADTi = first year annual average daily traffic for truck category i
fi = truck factor for vehicles in truck category i
Table 20.3
Table 20.6

You might also like