Basic Research Method Note (2)
Basic Research Method Note (2)
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT
JANUARY 2023
BONGA, ETHIOPIA
Business Research Methods Not for Exit Exam. Preparation.
2023
Table of Content
CHAPTER ONE: RESEARCH METHODS ............................................................................... 1
1.1 Meaning & Definition of Research ........................................................................................ 1
1.2 Types of research ................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Objective of Research ............................................................................................................ 6
1.4 Methods of scientific research ............................................................................................... 6
CHAPTER TWO: DEFINING RESEARCH PROBLEM AND HYPOTHESIS
FORMULATION ....................................................................................................................... 11
2.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11
2.1. What is Research Problem? ................................................................................................. 11
2.2 Components of research problem ......................................................................................... 14
1.3 Problem formulation and research question.......................................................................... 15
1.4 What is hypothesis? .............................................................................................................. 17
1.5 Importance of hypothesis ...................................................................................................... 17
The word research is composed of two syllables, re and search. The dictionary defines the
former as a prefix meaning again, anew or over again and the latter as a verb meaning to
examine closely and carefully, to test and try, or to probe. Together they form a noun
describing a careful, systematic, patient study and investigation in some field of knowledge,
undertaken to establish facts or principles.
A research need not lead to ideal solution but it may give rise to new problems which may
require further research. In other words research is not an end to a problem since every
research gives birth to a new question. It is carried on both for discovering new facts and
verification of old ones.
Research in common parlance refers to search for knowledge. Actually the word Research is
derived from French word „Researcher‟ meaning „to search back„. In simple term research is
an in-depth study of the status, to find out the inner truth, inner story of any subject of
interest, and also to solve problems.
One can also define research as a scientific and systematic search for pertinent information on
a specific topic. In fact research is an art of scientific investigation. In short, research is all
about;
A careful investigation /inquiry especially through search for new facts in any branch
of knowledge.
A systematized effort to gain new knowledge.
Search for knowledge through objective and systematic methods of finding solution
to a problem.
Definitions of Research
- Research is an organized enquiry Designed and carried out to provide information for
solving a problem, (Fred kerlinger).
1
Business Research Methods Not for Exit Exam. Preparation.
2023
2. Research must follow a systematic / scientific procedure and well-drawn research plan.
3. It is a controlled, empirical and critical investigation.
4. Its purpose is to provide information for decision making and solving problems. Further to
establish relationship between the variables.
1. Based On Outcome Of The Research: whether the research tries to solve a particular
problem or makes a general contribution to the knowledge, research can be classified on
the following traits.
A. Basic/Pure/Fundamental Research
Fundamental research is also called academic or basic or pure research. Such research is
aimed at investigating or search for new principles and laws. It is mainly concerned with
generalization and formulation of a theory. Fundamental research is organized only for the
attainment of knowledge and truth. With change of time and space, it is necessary to make
in the fundamental principles in every branch of science; thus, this type of research also
verifies the old established theories, principles and laws. In general, fundamental research is
concerned with the theoretical aspect of science.
B. Applied Research:
A research aimed finding a solution for an immediate problem facing a society, a group or
industry (business organization). The results of such research would be used by either
individuals or groups of decision-makers or even by policy makers.
Social impact analysis: the major purpose of social assessment is to estimate the likely
consequences of a planned change. Such an assessment can be used for planning and
making choices among alternative policies.
Evaluation Research: is widely used type of applied research that addresses the
question, “did it works?” Evaluation is a process of establishing value judgment based
on evidence.
Applied research being impact analysis or evaluation research uses two tools namely; need
assessment and cost benefit analysis.
Need Assessment: a research collects data, to determine major needs and their severity.
It is often a preliminary step before deciding on a strategy to help people.
Cost benefit analysis: this is commonly used in social impact analysis. Economics
developed cost benefit analysis, in which the researcher estimates the future costs and
the expected benefits of one or several proposed actions and gives them monetary
values.
A. Exploratory Research (Pilot Survey): It is also called preliminary research. As its name
implied, such research is aimed at discovering, identifying and formulating a research
problem and hypothesis. When there are few or no studies that can be referred such research
is needed. Sales decline in a company may be due to: Inefficient service, improper price,
inefficient sales force, Ineffective promotion, improper quality.
The research executives must examine such questions to identify the most useful avenues for
further research. Preliminary investigation of this type is called exploratory research. Expert
surveys, focus groups, case studies and observation methods are used to conduct the
exploratory survey. E.g. “Our sales are declining and we don„t know why?
Descriptive research deals with demographic characteristics of the consumer. For example,
trends in the consumption of soft drink with respect to socio-economic characteristics such
as age, family, income, education level etc. Another example can be the degree of viewing
TV channels, its variation with age, income level, and profession of respondent as well as
time of viewing.
That is, on the basis of data used in the research process research to be
4. On the Basis of the Environment: in which the research is carried out can be:
A. Field Research - It is a research carried out in the field. Such research is common in
social science, agricultural science, history and archaeology.
C. Simulation Research - Such research uses model to represent the real world. Simulation
is common in physical science, economics and mathematics.
5. On the Basis of the Time Required to Complete the Research, research can be:
Objective of Research
The purpose of research is to discover answer to questions through the application of
scientific procedures. The main aim of research is to find out the truth which is hidden and
which has not been discovered as yet. Though each research study has its own specific
purpose, we may think of research objectives as falling into a number of following broad
groupings.
1. To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insight into it. Studies with this
object in view are known as Exploratory Research
3. To Determine the frequency with which something occurs / or with which it is associated
with something else – studies with this object in view are known as Diagnostic Research
studies.
4. To test the hypotheses of a causal relationship between variables – such studies are known
as Hypothesis Testing Research.
Research Method: research method is all about all those methods / techniques / procedures
for conduction of research. Research method, thus, refers to the methods the researchers use
in performing research operations. In other words, all those methods which are used by the
researcher during the course of studying his research are termed as research methods.
In short, research methods can be put into the following three groups:
a. Those methods which are concerned with the collection of Date (i.e. methods of data
collection)
b. Those methods / statistical techniques which are used for establishing relationship
between the data and the unknowns (i.e., methods of analysis)
c. Those methods which are used to evaluate the accuracy of the result obtained.
From what has been stated above, we can say that research methodology has many
dimensions and research methods do constitute a part of research methodology. The scope of
research methodology is wider than that of research method.
Thus, when we talk about research methodology we are not only talk of research methods but
also consider the LOGIC behind the methods we use in the context of our research study and
explain why we are using a particular method and why we are not using others so that
research result are capable of being evaluated.
A host of other similar questions are usually answered when we talk of research methodology
concerning a research study.
For clear perception of the term research, one should know the meaning of scientific method.
The two terms, research and scientific method are closely related. Research as already stated,
can be termed as “an enquiry in to the nature of, the reason for and the consequence of any
particular set of circumstances, whether these circumstances are experimentally controlled or
recorded just as they occur”.
On the other hand scientific method is the pursuit of truth as determined by logical
considerations. The ideas of science are to achieve a systematic interrelation of facts.
Scientific method attempts to achieve these ideal by observation – experimentation – logical
argument from accepted postulates and the combination of these three in varying propositions
(i.e., declarative tentative statements). In scientific method logic aids in formulating
propositions explicitly and accurately so that their possible alternative become clear with the
consequence of such alternatives.
Thus, the scientific method is the best way yet discovered for winnowing the truth from lies
and delusion. It is based on certain basic postulates. The simple version looks something like
this:
When consistency is obtained the hypotheses becomes a theory and provides a coherent set of
propositions, which explain a class of phenomenon. A theory is then a framework with in
which observations are explained and predictions are made. The great advantage of scientific
method is that:
- It is unprejudiced: one does not have to believe a given researcher: one can redo the
experiment and determine whether his / her results are true or false. The conclusions will hold
irrespective of the state of mind.
- A theory is accepted not based on the prestige or convincing power of the proponent, but on
the results obtained through observation and / or experiments, which any one can reproduce:
the result obtained through scientific method are repeatable.
A frequent criticism made of the scientific method is that it cannot accommodate any thing
that has not been proved. The argument then points out that many things thought to be
impossible in the past are now every day realities. This criticism is based on a
misinterpretation of the scientific method. When the hypotheses pass the test it is adopted as a
theory it correctly explains arrange of phenomenon it can, at any time, be falsified by new
experimental evidences. When exploring a new sort of phenomena scientists do using
existing theories but, since this is a new area of investigation, it is always kept in mind that
the old theories might fail to explain the new experiment and observations. In this case new
hypotheses are devised and tested until a new theory emerges.
The other limitations of scientific method are relating with the: Difficulty in use of
experiments: for instance the laboratory of social scientists is the world of everyday living. It
is difficult to control external factors; Complexity of subject matters; Measurement problem;
Difficulties in replication / generalization; Differences in observation – bias / preconception
of phenomenon; and Objectivity.
Motivation in Research
Significance of Research
“All progress is born of inquiry. Doubt is often better than over confidence, for it leads to
inquiry, and inquiry, and inquiry leads to invention” is a famous Hudson maxim in the
context of which the significance of research can well be understood, and the following are
the basic:
Research provides the basis for nearly all government policies in our economic
system.
Research has its special significance involving various operational and planning
problems of business and industry.
Research is equally important for social scientists in studying social relationships and
it„s seeking answers to various social problems.
To philosophers and thinkers research may mean the out let for new ideas and
insights.
To professional in research, it may mean a source of insights.
To analysis and intellectuals, it may mean the development of new theories.
To literary men & women, it may mean development of new styles & creative work.
To managers it helps to get information as basis for making certain decisions.
CHAPTER TWO
DEFINING RESEARCH PROBLEM AND HYPOTHESIS
FORMULATION
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In research process, the first and foremost step happens to be that of selecting and properly
defining a research problem. A researcher must find the problem and formulate it so that it
becomes susceptible to research. Like a medical doctor, a researcher must examine all the
symptoms (presented to him or observed by him) concerning a problem before he can
diagnose correctly. To define a problem correctly, a researcher must know: what a problem
is?
The first step in the research process is the choice of suitable problem for investigation.
Problem is any question or matter involving doubt, uncertainty or difficulty. Problem also
denotes here a question proposed for solution or discussion. On the other hand research
problem refers to a problem that someone would like to investigate; a situation that needs to
be changed or addressed. These problems usually consist of area of concern, condition to be
improved, difficulties to be eliminated, and questions seeking answer. A research problem
also defined as an issue or concern that an investigator presents and justifies in research
study.
The identification of research problem is difficult, but it is an important phase of the entire
research process. It requires a great deal of patience and logical thinking on the part of the
researcher. Beginners find the tasks of identifying a research problem a difficult one. Most of
the time researchers select a problem because of his own unique needs and purposes. There
are, however, some important sources which are helpful to a researcher for selecting problem
to be investigated.
a problem area within a certain context involving the, who, what, where, when and the why
of the problem situation.
1. Aim or purpose of the problem for investigation. This answers the question why „why is
there an investigation, inquiry to study.
2. The subject matter or topic to be investigated. This answers the question what.
3. The place/local where the research is to be conducted. This answers the question where?
4. The period or time of the study during which the data are to be gathered. This answers the
question when.
5. Population/universe from whom the data are to be collected. Answers the question who or
from whom.
1. Identify broad fields of study. In which area are you most interested? E.g. Management,
2. Dissect the broad area into sub-areas, E.g. HRM, Motivation, and Leadership
3. Select the sub-areas which you are most interested within the subject by considering your
knowledge, time, budget…etc
5. Formulate research objectives: Research objectives are drive from research questions.
Research objectives and research questions are the same except the way they are written.
Research objectives are written in the form of affirmative statement by using action
oriented words, such as ―to examine, ―to ascertain‖, ―to measure‖, ―to investigate‖
etc.
6. Assess objectives- evaluating the objectives in the light of the time, budget, technical and
professional expertise about the subject and other related resources.
7. Double check- go back and make sure that you have sufficient interest, time, resource and
expertise, if you are happy, then you jumps to next step.
Research problem / Idea originate from many sources. We discuss four of these sources for
the time being: Everyday life, practical issue, past research (literature), and Inference from
theory.
1. Everyday life: is one common source of research problem / idea, Based on Questioning
and inquisitive approach, you can draw from your experiences, and come up with many
research problems. For example think about what type of management practices in
cooperatives you believe work well or do not work well. Would you be interested in doing a
research study on one or more of those practices?
2. Practical Issue: this is one of most important source of research problem especially when
you are practitioner. What are some current problem facing cooperatives developments?
What research topic do you think can address some of these problems?
By such types of inquisitive approach with regard to the practical issue you can come up with
research problem.
3. Past research (literature): Among the sources of research problems one has to be very
familiar with the literature in the field of one„s interest. Past research is probably the most
important source of research idea / problem. That is because, importantly research usually
generate more questions than it answers. This also the best way to come with a specific idea
that will fit in to and extend the research literature.
specific situation makes an excellent starting point for research. The following question gives
illustration how theory can be a source of research problem.
- Do you have any theories that you believe have merit? Test them.
- If there is little or no theory in the area of interest to you, then think about collecting data to
help you to generate a theory.
The Most Important Components of research problem as discussed by R. L. Ackoff are listed
below:
There must be individuals or groups which have some difficulty or problem. The individuals
or the groups themselves may be researchers. There are other participants in the problem. All
are affected by the decision on the part of the research consumer.
There must be some objectives to be attained as the research consumer must have something
he wants to get it. It one wants nothing, one cannot have a problem.
There must be alternative means or the courses of action for attaining an objective one wishes
to obtain. Means are courses of action. A course of action may involve the use of objects.
Objects are the instruments. This means that there must be at least two means available to a
researcher or if he has no choice or means, he cannot have a problem.
The existence of alternative courses of action is not enough. To experience a problem the
researcher must have some doubt as to which alternative to select. Without such a doubt there
can be no problem. This means that research must answer the question concerning the
relative efficiency of the possible alternative.
There must be some environments to which the difficulty or problem pertains. A change in
the environment may produce or remove a problem. A researcher may have doubts as to
which will be the most efficient means in one environment but may entertain no such doubt
in another. Some problems are quite general.
Thus, a research problem is one which requires a researcher to find out the best solution for
the given problem so that the objective can be attained optimally in the context of a given
environment.
After selecting a specific research topic and conducting a thorough literature review, you are
ready to take the next step in planning a research study: clearly articulating the research
problem. The research problem typically takes the form of a concise question regarding the
relationship between two or more variables. Examples of research problems include the
following:
i. Is the onset of depression among elderly males related to the development of physic
al limitations?
ii. What effect does a sudden dip in the Dow Jones Industrial Average have on the economy of
small businesses?
iii. Will a high-fiber, low-fat diet be effective in reducing cholesterol levels among middle-aged
females?
iv. Can a memory enhancement class improve the memory functioning of patients with
progressive dementia?
When articulating a research question, it is critically important to make sure that the
question is specific enough to avoid confusion and to indicate clearly what is being studied.
In other words, the research problem should be composed of a precisely stated research
question that clearly identifies the variables being studied. A vague research question often
results in methodological confusion, because the research question does not clearly indicate
what or who is being studied.
The following are some examples of vague and nonspecific research questions:
As you can see, each of these questions is rather vague, and it is impossible to determine
exactly what is being studied. For example,
In the first question, what type of weather is being studied, and memory for what?
In the second question, is the researcher studying all types of exercise, and the effects
of exercise on the physical and mental health of all people or a specific subgroup of
people?
Finally, in the third question, which street drugs are being studied, and what specific
types of criminal behaviour?
Let‟s say that a researcher is interested in studying the effects of large class sizes on the
academic performance of gifted children in high population schools. The research question
may be phrased in the following manner: “What effects do large class sizes have on the
academic performance of gifted children in high-population schools?” This may seem to be a
fairly straightforward research question, but upon closer examination, it should become
evident that there are several important terms and concepts that need to be defined. For
example, what constitutes a “large class”; what does “academic performance” refer to; which
kids are considered “gifted”; and what is meant by “high population schools”?
To reduce confusion, the terms and concepts included in the research question need to be
clarified through the use of operational definitions. For example, “large classes” may be
defined as classes with 30 or more students; “academic performance” may be limited to
scores received on standardized achievement tests; “gifted” children may include only those
children who are in advanced classes; and “high-population schools” may be defined as
schools with more than 1,000 students. Without operationally defining these key terms and
concepts, it would be difficult to determine what exactly is being studied. Further, the
specificity of the operational definitions will allow future researchers to replicate the research
study.
Good research problems must meet three criteria (see Kerlinger, 1973).
First, the research problem should describe the relationship between two or more
variables.
Second, the research problem should take the form of a question.
Third, the research problem must be capable of being tested empirically (i.e., with
data derived from direct observation and experimentation).
After you have identified a problem, you may formulate certain answers in the form of
hypotheses. These guesses are based on the past experiences or informal observation or
information gained from others. A hypothesis is defined as “A tentative proposition
suggested as a solution to a problem or as an explanation of some phenomenon (Ary
et.al. 1985).
It is an agreed fact that, whenever possible, research should proceed from a hypothesis.
Hypotheses are particularly necessary in studies where the cause-and-effect relationships are
to be discovered. These, however, may not be so important in research studies in which the
issue is of determining the status of a given historical, social or educational
phenomenon.
It may be mentioned here that hypotheses are not essential to all researches,
particularly, in the early stages of exploration of a problem. And it should not be assumed
that failure to develop a hypothesis is necessarily a sign of lack of scientific orientation.
However, a hypothesis may be conceived as an assumption which merits consideration
and needs to be tested against the available empirical evidence. That is why it is
suggested that a hypothesis is to be used as a pivot around which the investigation
resolves, limiting thereby the field of investigation to a definite target and also
determining the observations to be made and the ones to ignore.
A good hypothesis has several basic characteristics. We discuss some of them as follows:
This is necessary because, a given fact may be relevant with respect to one hypothesis and
irrelevant with respect to another, or it may belong to one classification with regard to first
hypothesis or to an entirely different classification with regard to the second. Thus,
hypotheses ensure the collection of relevant data necessary to answer questions arising from
the statement of the problem. For example, in a research problem, „Study habits and
achievement of Distance Education Learners‟, the researcher may frame the hypothesis –
learners putting in more study hours achieve more in the examination. The researcher will
collect data about the number of hours being put in by learners for study and their
achievement in the examination.
ii) Hypothesis should be testable: Hypotheses should be stated in such a way as to indicate
an expected difference or an expected relationship between the measures used in the research.
The researcher should not state any hypothesis that she/he does not have reason to believe
that it can be tested or evaluated by some objective means.
Hypotheses are the propositions about the relationships between variables. These can be
tested empirically. There is no relationship between attendance to personal contact
programmes in a distance education course and achievement in examination. Such
propositions can be tested by means of empirical data.
iii) Hypothesis should be brief and clear: Hypothesis should be stated clearly and briefly. It
makes problems easier for the reader to understand and also for the researcher to test. The
statement should be a concise statement of the relationship expected.
There are some important aspects to be looked into to judge the worth of a hypothesis in
research. A good hypothesis must be:
i) consistent with known facts and theories, and might be even expected to predict or
anticipate previously unknown data,
iii) stated in the simplest possible terms, depending upon the complexity of the concepts
involved in the research problem, and
iv) stated in a way that it can be tested for its being probably true or probably false,
in order to arrive at conclusions in the form of empirical or operational statements.
The following examples may be cited in order to justify how the couple of criteria apply to
hypotheses:
1. More intelligent persons will be less hostile than those of lower level of intelligence.
In the first hypothesis, we visualize a relation stated between one variable, „intelligence‟, and
another variable „hostility.‟ Furthermore, measurement of these variables is also easily
conceivable. In the second example, a relation has also been stated between the variables
„group study‟ and „grade achievement.‟ There exists the possibility of the measurement of the
variables are thus there is implication for testing the hypotheses. Thus both the criteria are
satisfied. „
2.7 Types of Hypothesis
Hypothesis can be formulated in either of the following two ways:
(i) Null Hypothesis (Ho): It states that there is no much (significant) difference between the parameter and
statistic. In other words, H states that the difference between sample statistic and the claimed population
parameter is due to chance variation in sampling. Null hypothesis is normally preferred in testing process. It
enables the researcher to test it. The random selection of the samples from the given population makes the
tests of significance valid for us. For applying any test of significance we first set up a hypothesis - a define
statement about the population parameter(s). Such a statistical hypothesis, which is under test, is usually a
hypothesis of no difference between statistical and parameter. Hence it is called Null hypothesis. In the
words of R.A. Fisher null hypothesis is the hypothesis which is tested for possible rejection under the
assumption that it is true.
(ii) Alternative Hypothesis (Ha): It is true when Ho is false. It is the statement about the population that must
be true if null hypothesis is false. Any hypothesis which is complementary to the null hypothesis is called
an alternative hypothesis. It is important to explicitly state the alternative hypothesis in respect of any null
hypothesis, because the acceptance or rejection of H is meaningful only it is being tested against a rival
hypothesis
2.8 Type I error and Type II error.
Type I error means rejection the null hypothesis when it happens to be true.
Type II error means not rejection the null hypothesis when it is false.
The following tables being explain the type of error
Position of Hypothesis Null Hypothesis-Not reject Null hypothesis-Reject
Ho TRUE Correct Decision Type: I Error
Ha FALSE Type II Error Correct Decision
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH PROPOSAL
A research proposal is a simply a structured, formal document that explains what you plan to
research (i.e. your research topic), why it‟s worth researching (i.e. your justification),
and how you plan to investigate it (i.e. your practical approach).
The purpose of the research proposal (it‟s job, so to speak) is to convince your research
supervisor, committee or university that your research is suitable (for the requirements of the
degree program) and manageable (given the time and resource constraints you will face).
The most important word here is “convince” – in other words, your research proposal needs
to sell your research idea (to whoever is going to approve it). If it doesn‟t convince them (of
its suitability and manageability), you‟ll need to revise and resubmit. This will cost you
valuable time, which will either delay the start of your research or eat into its time allowance
(which is bad news).
A research proposal is a formal document that explains what you plan to research,why it’s
worth researching and how you’ll do it.
A good dissertation or thesis proposal needs to cover the “what”, the “why” and the “how” of
the research. Let‟s look at each of these in a little more detail:
The WHAT
Your proposal needs to clearly articulate your research topic. This needs to be specific and
unambiguous. Your research topic should make it clear exactly what you plan to research
and in what context. Here‟s an example:
Topic: An investigation into the factors which impact female Generation Y consumer’s
likelihood to promote a specific makeup brand to their peers: a British context
As you can see, this topic is extremely clear. From this one line we can see exactly:
What’s being investigated – factors that make people promote a brand of makeup
Who it involves – female Gen-Y consumers
In what context – the United Kingdom
So, make sure that your research proposal provides a detailed explanation of your research
topic. It should go without saying, but don‟t starts writing your proposal until you have a
crystal-clear topic in mind, or you‟ll end up waffling away a few thousand words.
The WHY
It‟s not good enough to simply propose a research topic – you need to justify why your topic
is original. In other words, what makes it unique? What gap in the current does it fill? If it‟s
simply a rehash of the existing research, it‟s probably not going to get approval – it needs to
be fresh.
But, originality alone is not enough. Once you‟ve ticked that box, you also need to justify
why your proposed topic is important. In other words, what value will it add to the world if
you manage to find answers to your research questions?
For example, let‟s look at the sample research topic we mentioned earlier (factors impacting
brand advocacy). In this case, if the research could uncover relevant factors, these findings
would be very useful to marketers in the cosmetics industry, and would, therefore, have
commercial value. That is a clear justification for the research.
So, when you‟re crafting your research proposal, remember that it‟s not enough for a topic to
simply be unique. It needs to be useful and value-creating – and you need to convey that
value in your proposal.
The HOW
It‟s all good and well to have a great topic that‟s original and important, but you‟re not going
to convince anyone to approve it without discussing the practicalities – in other words:
While it‟s generally not expected that you‟ll have a fully fleshed out research strategy at the
proposal stage, you will need to provide a high-level view of your research methodology and
some key design decisions. Here are some important questions you‟ll need to address in your
proposal:
So, make sure you give some thought to the practicalities of your research and have at
least a basic understanding of research methodologies before you start writing up your
proposal.
While the exact structure and format required for a dissertation or thesis research proposal
differs from university to university, there are five “essential ingredients” that typically
make up the structure of a research proposal:
Final thoughts
As you write up your research proposal, remember the all-important core purpose: to
convince. Your research proposal needs to sell your research idea in terms of suitability and
viability. So, focus on crafting a convincing narrative and you‟ll have won half the battle.
While developing a detailed and comprehensive research proposal requires a lot of planning,
attention to details, and academic writing skills, understanding the core elements of the paper
is the first step to getting your proposal accepted.
So here are the elements that you should include in your research proposal.
1. Title
It sounds somewhat obvious when we say that your research proposal with a title. To say the
least, you already know you should.
But perhaps the most common mistake that many students make is to write general titles that
lack focus.
Instead of writing a long title that‟s hard to read or a short title that fails to highlight the
theme of your research, write a clear and concise headline that tells your reader what your
research proposal is about at a first glance.
2. Introduction
The starting paragraph to a research project is one of the elements of a good research
proposal because it introduces the subject you wish to address or a research problem you
wish to analyse. Because the introduction of a research proposal is what sets the tone for the
rest of the paper, it‟s important to start with a hook and then organize your thoughts in a
logical and organized manner.
The introduction to your research proposal should give background information and explain
why you believe a research question is worth exploring. While not mandatory, you can
briefly describe your methodologies in the introduction and then expand them later on.
Your introduction should be clear and concise. Make sure you include only the most relevant
information in this section so you don‟t make it unnecessarily too long.
3. Literature Review
Although a research proposal doesn‟t include a full literature review, it‟s important to
include an overview of the most significant studies in your field.
The section should feature evidence and statistical data to demonstrate the significance of
your research.
Through the literature review, you can easily draw your reader‟s attention to existing
research, identify gaps in existing studies, and make your reader understand how your
proposal will contribute to the already existing research.
Aims and objectives are what you wish your research proposal to accomplish. Your aims will
be your overall outcome or what you want the research to achieve.
Objectives tend to be narrower and more focused. More often than not, you need to provide
an explanation for each of your objectives to show how they will help to meet the aims of
your study.
Unless required, you don‟t really have to include a hypothesis that your research proposal
looks forward to test.
5. Research Methodology
Methodologies are simply the research methods you will use to conduct your study and they
must appear in your research proposal whether or not you‟re conducting an experimental
research.
Make sure your explanation for each methodology is clear and precise. It helps to justify why
you‟ve chosen to use a certain methodology over an alternative. This will go a long way to
show that you took your time to think about your methodologies before picking them.
It‟s important to explain how you will collect data, the sample size you plan to consider for
your research investigation, and the techniques you consider the most appropriate to analyse
the data.
Because you‟ll be working with limited time and resource, it‟s reasonable to include a section
on the scope of the research in your proposal. In other words, you have to show your reader
that you can start and complete your research within the constraints of these two resources.
Remember, your research will more than likely have limits, and addressing them in this
section not only shows that you have given them a thought but also makes your research
proposal strong and authentic.
Don‟t just focus on the challenges that you‟re likely to come across during your studies. You
should also propose alternative solutions that you can use and why they might help.
Your professor expects to see an outline and a timetable in your research proposal so it‟s
important that you include them in your research proposal. The purpose of the outline is to
show how you plan to structure your dissertation. Briefly note what each section will cover
and explain how it all fits into the argument of your research project. The purpose of the
timetable is to show how much time you‟ll need to complete your research. In particular, you
need to make sure you mention exactly how long you expect each stage of your study to take.
Don‟t just mention how long the research process will take. Make sure you also indicate how
long you‟ll take to compile your research.
CHAPTER FOUR
A research design is a “Blue Print” for collection, measurement and analysis of data. It
outlines how the research will be carried out. It is like glue which sticks together the entire
process of research. It provides answers to various questions like - What techniques will be
used to gather data. What kind of sampling will be used? How time and cost constraints be
dealt with? Etc.
Although every problem and research objective may seem unique, there are usually enough
similarities among problems and objectives to allow decisions to be made in advance about
the best plan to resolve the problem. There are some basic research designs that can be
successfully matched to given problems and research objectives.
• Exploratory
• Descriptive
• Causal
The choice of the most appropriate design depends largely on the objectives of the research
and how much is known about the problem and these objectives. The overall research design
for a project may include one or more of these three designs as part(s) of it.
Further, if more than one design is to be used, typically we progress from Exploratory toward
Causal.
Exploratory Research
Exploratory research is usually conducted when the researcher does not know much about the
problem and needs additional information or desires new or more recent information.
Exploratory research helps diagnose the dimensions of the problem so that successive
research will be on target. It helps to set priorities for research. Exploratory research is used
in a number of situations:
• Experience Surveys: - Issues and ideas may be discussed with persons who have had
Personal experience in the field.
Secondary data analysis:- Another quick and economical source of background information is
existing literature containing data that has been compiled for some purpose other than the
purpose in hand
• Case Study method: -obtains information from one or a few situations that are similar to
the problem situation. Primary advantage is that an entire organization or entity can be
investigated in depth and with meticulous attention to detail.
• Pilot Studies are used in different types of designs. - Within the context of exploratory
research it covers some part of the research on a small scale. Major categories of pilot study
include focus group interviews, projective techniques, and depth interviews.
• Focus Group interviews: - Unstructured, free flowing, group dynamic sessions that allow
individuals the opportunity to initiate the topics of discussion. There is synergistic and
spontaneous interaction among the respondents. Found to be highly advantageous.
Descriptive Research
• Cross-sectional studies
• Longitudinal studies
• Cross-sectional studies measure units from a sample of the population at only one point in
time. Sample surveys are cross-sectional studies whose samples are drawn in such a way as to
be representative of a specific population.
• On-line survey research is being used to collect data for cross-sectional surveys at a faster
rate of speed.
• One method is to draw different units from the same sampling frame.
• A second method is to use a “panel” where the same people are asked to respond
periodically.
• On-line survey research firms recruit panel members to respond to online equerries.
• Causal relationships are typically determined by the use of experiments, but other methods
are also used.
Experiments
– Independent variables: - that over which the researcher has control and wishes to
manipulate
– Dependent variables: - that over which the researcher has little to no direct control, but has
a strong interest in testing i.e. sales, profit, market share.
– Extraneous variables: - those that may affect a dependent variable but are not independent
variables.
Experimental Design
• Control group: O3 O4
• the observed change in the dependent variable is, in fact, due to the independent variable
(internal validity)
• if the results of the experiment apply to the “real world” outside the experimental setting
(External validity)
• The instrument you choose for data collection affects your entire study.
Internal Validity – The degree to which changes in the dependent variable are affected by
the manipulated independent variable. Maintaining high internal validity means controlling
for all other independent variables other than the one(s) being studied
External Validity – The degree to which the results of a study can be generalized to the “real
world”. Factors that negatively affect external validity also negatively affect the
generalizability of the results
Instrument Validity
– Construct
– Criterion related
Content – Inter-rater / Intra-rater
Construct Validity
It is the most important type of validity. Construct validity is the degree to which the
instrument actually measures whether or not an underlying construct is being measured.
For example, does a math test actually measure math achievement? Does a personality test
actually measure personality?
i. Concurrent validity – Degree to which scores on one test are correlated with scores
on another test administered at the same time. Only one group isused.
ii. Predictive validity – Degree to which scores on one test predicts scores on a test
administered in the future. Only one group is used.
Reliability
Reliability is the consistency with which an instrument measures the construct or content area
it is intended to measure. Reliability is established using such techniques as
o split-half,
o rationale equivalence and inter-rater
Reliability is reported as a coefficient ranging from 0.00 (low) to +1.00 (high). Anything
above .70 is considered sufficient for most cases
Measures of Reliability
Research design is needed because it facilitates the smooth sailing of the various research
operations. It makes the research as efficient as possible by giving maximum information
with minimal expenditure of effort, time and money. For construction of a house, we need to
have a proper blueprint prepared by an expert architect. Similarly, we need a proper research
design or plan prior to data collection and analysis of our research project. Preparation of
research design should be done carefully as even a minute error might ruin the purpose of the
entire project.
The design helps the researcher to organize his/her ideas, which helps to identify and correct
his/her flaws, if any. In a good research design, all the components with each other or go
together with each other in a coherent manner. The theoretical and conceptual framework
must with the research goals and purposes. Likewise, the data collection strategy must fit
with the research purposes, conceptual and theoretical framework and approach to data
analysis.
Helps in proper planning of the resources and their procurement in right time.
Hence, a research design is the outline, plan, or strategy that you are going to
use to obtain an answer to your research question.
The importance of research design lies in the fact that it makes a statement of what is to
be done in order to achieve the research objectives and how it is to be done.
It furnishes the minimum information required for planning the research project.
The research design furnishes a clear idea as to the activities that would need to be
undertaken in order to achieve the research objective.
It enables the researcher to have a frame of reference and prevent the study fromdeviating.
The research design helps in providing direction to the computation and interpretation process to
arrive at solution and recommendations
There are following feature of good research design. Which are as follows?
CHAPTER FIVE
Primary Sources provide raw information and first-hand evidence. Examples include
interview transcripts, statistical data, and works of art. A primary source gives you direct
access to the subject of your research.
A primary source is anything that gives you direct evidence about the people, events, or
phenomena that you are researching. Primary sources will usually be the main objects of your
analysis.
If you are researching the past, you cannot directly access it yourself, so you need primary
sources that were produced at the time by participants or witnesses (e.g. letters, photographs,
newspapers).
If you are researching something current, your primary sources can either be qualitative or
quantitative data that you collect yourself (e.g. through interviews, surveys, experiments) or
sources produced by people directly involved in the topic (e.g. official documents or media
texts).
Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but good research uses both primary and
secondary sources. Methods of collecting primary data explained below.
5.1.1 Direct observation
Observations can also be either direct or indirect. Direct observation is when you watch
interactions, processes, or behaviors as they occur; for example, observing a teacher teaching
a lesson from a written curriculum to determine whether they are delivering it with fidelity.
Indirect observations are when you watch the results of interactions, processes, or behaviors;
for example, measuring the amount of plate waste left by students in a school cafeteria to
determine whether a new food is acceptable to them.
This method assumes that behavior is purposeful and expressive of deeper values and beliefs.
Observation can range from a highly structured, detailed notation of behavior structured by
checklists to a more holistic description of events and behavior.
In the early stages of qualitative inquiry, the researcher typically enters the setting with broad
areas of interest but without predetermined categories or strict observational checklists. In
this way, the researcher is able to discover the recurring patterns of behavior and
relationships. After these patterns are identified and described through early analysis of field
notes, checklists become more appropriate and context-sensitive.
Focused observation then is used at later stages of the study, usually to see, for example, if
analytic themes explain behavior and relationships over a long time or in a variety of settings.
Observation is the systematic viewing of specific phenomenon in its proper setting for the
specific purpose of gathering data for a particular study.
Features of observation
Types of observation
Advantages of observation
5.1.2 Questionnaires
Questionnaire is simply a „tool‟ for collecting and recording information about a particular
issue of interest.
population from which information is desired. It is mainly made up of a list of questions, and
also includes clear instructions and space for answers or administrative details.
Questionnaires should always have a definite purpose that is related to the objectives of the
research, and it needs to be clear from the outset how the findings will be used. Respondents
also need to be made aware of the purpose of the research wherever possible, and should be
told how and when they will receive feedback on the findings. The information from
questionnaires tends to fall into two broad categories – „facts‟ and „opinions‟. It is worth
stressing that, in practice, questionnaires are very likely to include questions about both facts
and opinions.
The purpose of the questionnaire is to gather information from widely scattered sources. It is
mostly used in cases where one can not readily see personally all of the people from whom he
desires responses. It is also used where there is no particular reason to see them personally.
Unstructured questions ask respondents to provide a response in their own words, while
structured questions ask respondents to select an answer from a given set of choices.
Subjects‟ responses to individual questions (items) on a structured questionnaire may be
aggregated into a composite scale or index for statistical analysis. Structured questionnaires
are usually associated with quantitative research, i.e. research that is concerned with numbers
(how many? how often? how satisfied?). Within this context, questionnaires can be used in a
variety of survey situations, for example postal, electronic, face-to-face and telephone. Postal
and electronic questionnaires are known as self-completion questionnaires, i.e. respondents
complete them by themselves in their own time. Face to-face (F2F) and telephone
questionnaires are used by interviewers to ask a standard set of questions and record the
responses that people give them. Questionnaires that are used by interviewers in this way are
sometimes known as interview schedules.
Question Types
Questionnaire can be of various types on the basis of its preparation. They are like:
The structured questionnaire contains definite, concrete and directed questions; whereas non-
structured questionnaire is often used in interview and guide. It may consist of partially
completed questions.
Many advice against using open-ended questions and advocate using closed questions.
However, open questions can be useful. The questions that call for short check responses are
known as restricted or closed form type. For Example, they provide for marking a yes or no, a
short response or checking an item from a list of responses.
Here the respondent is not free to write of her/his own, she/he was to select from the selected
from the supplied responses. On the other hand, increase of open ended questionnaire, the
respondent is free to response in her/his own words. Many questionnaires also included both
close and open type questions. The researcher selects the type of questionnaire according to
his need of the study.
Dichotomous response, where respondents are asked to select one of two possible
choices, such as true/false, yes/no, or agree/disagree. Examples of such questions are:
What is your sex? (Circle one): Male / Female
Are you married? (Circle one): yes / no.
Do you think that the death penalty is justified under some circumstances (circle one):
yes / no.
Nominal response, where respondents are presented with more than two unordered
options. These types of questions are called open-end questions. Such as:
What is your industry of employment? Manufacturing / consumer services / retail /
education / healthcare / tourism & hospitality / other
What was the attitude of the authorities regarding maternity leave in your case or may
be in someone else‟s case? He readily gave maternity leave / He was hesitant to give
maternity leave / He was terribly annoyed / He gave leave but warned / Any other,
please specify
5.1.3 Interview
Interviews are an attractive proposition for the project researcher. Interviews are something
more than conversation. They involve a set of assumptions and understandings about the
situation which are not normally associated with a casual conversion. Interviews are also
referred as an oral questionnaire by some people, but it is indeed sentimentality more than
that.
Questionnaire involves indirect data collection, whereas Interview data is collected directly
from others in face to face contact. As you know, people are hesitant to write something than
to talk. With friendly relationship and rapport, the interviewer can obtain certain types of
confidential information which might be reluctant to put in writing.
An interview is” A method of data collection in which one person (an interviewer) asks
questions of another person (a respondent): interviews are conducted either faceto-face or by
telephone.”
Importance of Interview:
Whether it is large scale research or small scale research, the nature of the data collection
depends on the amount of resources available. Interview is particularly appropriate when the
researcher wishes to collect data based on:
It is appropriate when dealing with young children, illiterates, language difficulty and
limited intelligence.
It supplies the detail and depth needed to ensure that the questionnaire asks valid
questions while preparing questionnaire.
It is a follow up to a questionnaire and complements the questionnaire.
It can be combined with other tools in order to corroborate facts using a different
approach.
It is one of the normative survey methods, but it is also applied in historical research,
experimental research, case studies.
�Proper preparation.
�Skillful execution and
�Adequate recording and interpretation.
Advantages of Interview:
Depth Information: Interviews are particularly good at producing data which deal with topics
in depth and in detail. Subjects can be probed, issues pursued lines of investigation followed
over a relatively lengthy period.
Types of Interview:
Interviews vary in purpose, nature and scope. They may be conducted for guidance,
therapeutic or research purposes. They may be confined to one individual or extended to
several people. The following discussions describe several types of interview.
Structured Interview:
Structured interview involves fight control over the format of questions and answers. It is like
a questionnaire which is administered face to face with a respondent.
The researcher has a predetermined list of questions. Each respondent is faced with identical
questions. The choice of alternative answers is restricted to a predetermined list. This type of
interview is rigidly standardized and formal.
Structured interviews are often associated with social surveys where researchers are trying to
collect large volumes of data from a wide range of respondents.
Semi-Structured Interview:
In semi-structures interview, the interviewer also has a clear list of issues to be addressed and
questions to be answered. There is some flexibility in the order of the topics. In this type,
interviewee is given chance to develop his ideas and speak more widely on the issues raised
by the researcher. The answers are open-ended and more emphasis is on the interviewee
elaborating points of interest.
Unstructured Interview:
Single Interview:
Group Interview:
In case of group interview, more than one informant is involved. The numbers involved
normally about four to six people. Here you may think that it is difficult to get people
together to discuss matters on one occasion and how many voices can contribute to the
discussion during any one interview. But the crucial thing to bear in mind is that a group
interview is not an opportunity for the researcher to questions to a sequence of individuals,
taking turns around a table. „Group‟ is crucial here, because it tells us that those present in the
interview will interact with one another and that the discussion will operate at the level of the
group. They can present a wide range of information and varied viewpoints.
According to Lewis, “Group interviews have several advantages over individual interviews.
In particular, they help to reveal consensus views, may generate richer responses by allowing
participants to challenge one another‟s views, may be used to verify research ideas of data
gained through other methods and may enhance the reliability of responses.”
The disadvantages of this type of interview are that the views of „quieter‟ people do not come
out. Certain members may dominate the talk. The most disadvantages are that whatever
opinions are expressed is acceptable by the group irrespective of their opinions contrary to it.
Private opinion does not given importance.
The respondents are permitted to express themselves completely, but the interviewer directs
the live of thought. In this case, importance is given on collective views rather than the
aggregate view. It concentrates on particular event or experience rather than on a general line
of equality.
Secondary data are basically second-hand pieces of information. These are not gathered from
the source as the primary data. To put it in other words, the secondary data are those that are
already collected. So, these are comparatively less reliable than the primary data.
These are usually used when the time for the enquiry is compact and the exactness of the
enquiry can be settled to an extent. However, the secondary data can be gathered from
different sources which can be categorized into two categories. These are as follows:
1. Published sources
2. Unpublished sources
1. Published sources
Secondary data is usually gathered from the published (printed) sources. A few major sources
of published information are as follows:
2. Unpublished sources
Statistical data can be obtained from several unpublished references. Some of the major
unpublished sources from which secondary data can be gathered are as follows:
Statistics maintained by different departments and agencies of the central and the state
government, undertakings, corporations, etc.
Once you have clear and focused evaluation questions, the next step is to decide from where/
whom you will get the data to answer your evaluation questions. Example data sources include
documents, individuals, and observations. Then you can decide on which data collection
methods to use and should consider the following when selecting your methods.
What method(s) seems most appropriate for the purpose of your evaluation and the
evaluation questions that you want answered?
Will the method(s) allow you to gather information that can be analyzed and presented in a
way that will be seen as credible by your stakeholders?
Where and how can respondents‟ best be reached? What is the culturally and linguistically
appropriate method to use? Is conducting a personal interview or a survey more appropriate
for certain target populations? Do the data already exist, in program or health care data
systems?
Which method(s) can you afford and manage? What resource allocation is feasible? Consider
when results are needed, your own abilities, costs of hiring a consultant, and other resource
issues.
Degree of intrusiveness:
Will the method(s) disrupt the program or be seen as intrusive by the respondents? Also
consider issues of confidentiality if the information you are seeking is sensitive.
Type of Information:
What are the key strengths and weaknesses of each? Consider issues such as time and
respondent burden, cost, necessary infrastructure, and access to records. What is most
appropriate for your evaluation needs?
There are various methods for collecting data. Some examples of data collection methods and
their advantages and disadvantages are summarized below. Data collection methods may also
include use of existing data and data sets.
CHAPTER SIX
INTRODUCTION
The data, after collection, has to be processed and analyzed in accordance with the outline
laid down for the purpose at the time of developing the research plan. This is essential for a
scientific study and for ensuring that we have all relevant data for making contemplated
comparisons and analysis.
The completed instruments of data collection, viz., interview schedules/ questionnaires/ data
sheets/field notes contain a vast mass of data. They cannot straightaway provide answers to
research questions. They, like raw materials, need processing.
Intermediate stage of work between data collection & data analysis It involves classification
and summarization of data to make them amenable to analysis Requires advance planning
at the stage of planning the research design such as categorization of variables & preparation
of dummy tables
regard to points or stages at which editing should be done, one can talk of field editing and
central editing.
Editing is a process of checking to detect and correct errors & omissions, Completeness,
Accuracy and Uniformity
• Field editing consists in the review of the reporting forms by the investigator for
completing (translating or rewriting) what the latter has written in abbreviated and/or in
illegible form at the time of recording the respondents‟ responses. This type of editing is
necessary in view of the fact that individual writing styles often can be difficult for others
to decipher. This sort of editing should be done as soon as possible after the interview,
preferably on the very day or on the next day.
While doing field editing, the investigator must restrain himself and must not correct
errors of omission by simply guessing what the informant would have said if the question
had been asked.
• Central editing should take place when all forms or schedules have been completed and
returned to the office. This type of editing implies that all forms should get a thorough
editing by a single editor in a small study and by a team of editors in case of a large
inquiry. Editor(s) may correct the obvious errors such as an entry in the wrong place,
entry recorded in months when it should have been recorded in weeks, and the like. In
case of inappropriate on missing replies, the editor can sometimes determine the proper
answer by reviewing the other information in the schedule. At times, the respondent can
be contacted for clarification.
Coding
Coding refers to the process of assigning numerals or other symbols to answers so that
responses can be put into a limited number of categories or classes. Such classes should be
appropriate to the research problem under consideration.
Coding is necessary for efficient analysis and through it the several replies may be reduced to
a small number of classes which contain the critical information required for analysis. Coding
decisions should usually be taken at the designing stage of the questionnaire. This makes it
possible to pre code the questionnaire choices and which in turn is helpful for computer
tabulation as one can straight forward key punch from the original questionnaires. But in case
of hand coding some standard method may be used. One such standard method is to code in
the margin with a coloured pencil. The other method can be to transcribe the data from the
questionnaire to a coding sheet. Whatever method is adopted, one should see that coding
errors are altogether eliminated or reduced to the minimum level.
Coding process assigns numerals or other symbols to the several responses of the data set.
• Numeric Coding: Coding has to be compulsorily numeric, when the variable is to be
subject to further parametric analysis.
• Alphabetic Coding: A mere tabulation or frequency count or graphical representation
of the variable may be given an alphabetic coding.
Example for Coding
Q. No Variables Response Categories Code
1.1 Organization Private Pt
Public Pb
Cooperatives Co
3.4 Own house Yes 1
No 0
4.2 Performance Excellent 5
of Managers Good 4
Moderate 3
Bad 2
Worst 1
5.1 Age Up to 20 years 1
21-40 years 2
40-60 years 3
Above 60 years 4
5.2 Occupation Salaried S
Professional P
Technical T
Classification
Most research studies result in a large volume of raw data which must be reduced into
homogeneous groups if we are to get meaningful relationships. This fact necessitates
classification of data which happens to be the process of arranging data in groups or classes
on the basis of common characteristics. Data having a common characteristic are placed in
one class and in this way the entire data get divided into a number of groups or classes.
Classification can be one of the following two types, depending upon the nature of the
phenomenon involved:
(a) Classification according to attributes: As stated above, data are classified on the basis of
common characteristics which can either be descriptive (such as literacy, sex, honesty, etc.)
or numerical (such as weight, height, income, etc.). Descriptive characteristics refer to
qualitative phenomenon which cannot be measured quantitatively; only their presence or
absence in an individual item can be noticed. Data obtained this way on the basis of certain
attributes are known as statistics of attributes and their classification is said to be
classification according to attributes.
(b) Classification according to class-intervals: Unlike descriptive characteristics, the
numerical characteristics refer to quantitative phenomenon which can be measured through
some statistical units. Data relating to income, production, age, weight, etc. come under this
category. Such data are known as statistics of variables and are classified on the basis of class
intervals. For instance, persons whose incomes, say, are within Rs 201 to Rs 400 can form
one group, those whose incomes are within Rs 401 to Rs 600 can form another group and so
on.
6.2. Tabulation
Tabulation: When a mass of data has been assembled, it becomes necessary for the
researcher to arrange the same in some kind of concise and logical order. This procedure is
referred to as tabulation. Thus, tabulation is the process of summarizing raw data and
displaying the same in compact form (i.e., in the form of statistical tables) for further
analysis.
Process of summarizing raw data and displaying them on compact statistical tables for further
analysis. It involves counting of the number of cases falling into each of several categories.
Construction of table
Table provide shorthand summary of data
Components of Table
1. Heading
– Table No
– Title of the table
– Designation units
2. Body
– Sub-heading: heading of all rows or blocks of sub items
– Box-heading: headings of all columns or main captions and their sub captions
– Field or Body: the cells in rows and column
3. Notation
– Foot notes & source
– Construction of table
• Any explanatory footnotes concerning the table itself are placed directly beneath the
table
Data analysis is further transformation of the processed data to look for patterns and relations
among data groups. By analysis we mean the computation of certain indices or measures
along with searching for patterns or relationship that exist among the data groups.
Analysis particularly in case of survey or experimental data involves estimating the values of
unknown parameters of the population and testing of hypothesis for drawing inferences. In
brief, analysis involves examination and evaluation of some phenomenon by dividing it into
some constituent parts and identifying the relationships among the parts in the context of the
whole.
Critical examination of assembled and grouped data to determine the patterns of relationship
among the variables. The Purpose analysis is Summarizes large mass of data into
understandable & meaningful form.
1. Descriptive Analysis
2. Inferential Analysis
1. Descriptive analysis
Descriptive analysis is largely the study of distribution of one variable. Descriptive analysis
refers to the transformation of raw data into a form that will make them easy to understand
and interpret. Descriptive response or observation is typically the first form of analysis. The
Histogram
• This is another form of line chart used for presenting a frequency distribution.
• It is constructed by erecting vertical lines on the limits of the class intervals marked
on the base line.
• The vertical lines so drawn from a series of contiguous rectangles or columns.
• The Width of each rectangle represents its class interval, and the height represents the
class frequency.
Frequency Polygons
• The frequency of each class is located at the midpoint of the interval and the plotted
points are then connected by straight lines.
• The frequency polygon is particularly appropriate for portraying continuous series.
• The data are converted to percentage of the total; and the proportional segments,
therefore, give a clear picture of the relationship among the component parts.
Inferential Analysis
Here, we may as well talk of correlation and regression analysis.
Correlation is one of the most common forms of data analysis because it underlies many other
analyses. Correlations measure the linear relationship between two variables (a joint variation of two or
more variables for determining the amount of correlation between two or more variables). According to
(Hewitt and Cramer, 2008), correlation coefficient has a value ranging from -1 to 1. Values that is closer
to the absolute value of 1indicate that there is a strong relationship between the variables being
correlated, whereas values closer to 0 indicate that there is little or no linear relationship.
The sign of a correlation coefficient describes the type of relationship between the variables being
correlated. A positive correlation coefficient indicates that there is a positive linear relationship between
the variables: as one variable increases in value, so does the other. Partial Correlation: Partial correlation
measures separately the relationship between two variables in such a way that the effects of other
related variables are eliminated. In other words, in partial correlation analysis, we aim at measuring the
relation between a dependent variable and a particular independent variable by holding all other
variables constant.
• It is through interpretation that the researcher can well understand the abstract
principle that works beneath (beyond) his findings.
Precaution in interpretation
• The data reflect good homogeneity (no extreme) and proper analysis has been done
through statistical or any other methods.
• The researcher must remain cautious about the errors that can possibly arise in the
process of interpreting results.
Error can arise due to
False generalization and/or due to wrong interpretation of statistical measures, such
as:
The application of findings beyond the rang of observation
Broad generalization must be avoided, because the coverage restricted to a particular time, a
particular area and particular condition. Such restriction, if any, must invariably be specified
and the result must be framed within their limit.
6.5. Drawing Conclusions and Recommendations
The researcher summarizes the main findings of his study and the implications. Conclusions
summarize the main results of the research and describe what they mean for the general field.
Briefly describe what you did, consider suggesting future research to follow up where your
research ended.
6.6. Research Report
Research report is a formal statement of the research process and its results
It narrates the problem studied, method used, the findings and conclusion of the study
Characteristics of Report
Narrative but authoritative document
Presents highly specific information
It is a simple readable and accurate form of communication
o The key to scientific writing is clarity.
Scientists are required to write in clear and simple terms.
Ideas should be explained in simple language and short, coherent sentences. The
personal pronouns are avoided by the use of such expressions as the researcher or the
investigator.
Concepts and definitions must be sufficiently described depending upon the type and
capability of the target audience.
The past tense should be used in describing research procedures that have been
completed.
Functions of Research Report
Serve as a means of presenting the problem studied
Basic reference for future use
Means for judging the quality of the research
Means for evaluating the researcher‟s ability & competence
Provides factual base for formulating policies
Provides knowledge on problems and issues analyzed
Format of the Research Report/ Guidelines for preparing the research report
A. Preliminary section
1. Title page:
• The title page usually includes:
– The name of the topic
– The name of the author
– The relationship of the report to a course or degree requirement
– The name of the institution where the report is submitted
– The date and place of the presentation
2. Acknowledgement (if any)
3. Table of contents:
The relationship between principal and minor divisions is indicated by capitalization of
chapter numbers and titles, with subheadings in small letters and with capitalized principal
letters.
Research Report Format
• Preliminary items
– Title page – Table of contents
– Research‟s declaration – List of tables
– Certificate – List of graphs & charts
– Preface/acknowledgement – Abstract or synapsis
Body of the report
– Introduction – Statement of the problem
– Theoretical background of – Review of literature
the topic – scope of the study