Tali Boritz, Shelley McMain, Alexandre Vaz, Tony Rousmaniere PHD - Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (Essentials of Deliberate Practice) - American Psychological Association (2023)
Tali Boritz, Shelley McMain, Alexandre Vaz, Tony Rousmaniere PHD - Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy (Essentials of Deliberate Practice) - American Psychological Association (2023)
DIALECTICAL
BEHAVIOR THERAPY
Essentials of Deliberate Practice Series
Tony Rousmaniere and Alexandre Vaz, Series Editors
DELIBERATE PRACTICE IN
DIALECTICAL
BEHAVIOR THERAPY
TALI BORITZ
SHELLEY M CMAIN
ALEXANDRE VAZ
TONY ROUSMANIERE
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved. Except
as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication
may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, including, but not
limited to, the process of scanning and digitization, or stored in a database or retrieval
system, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
The opinions and statements published are the responsibility of the authors, and such
opinions and statements do not necessarily represent the policies of the American
Psychological Association.
Published by
American Psychological Association
750 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002
https://www.apa.org
Order Department
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books
[email protected]
In the U.K., Europe, Africa, and the Middle East, copies may be ordered from Eurospan
https://www.eurospanbookstore.com/apa
[email protected]
Names: Boritz, Tali, author. | McMain, Shelley, author. | Vaz, Alexandre, author. |
Rousmaniere, Tony, author.
Title: Deliberate practice in dialectical behavior therapy / Tali Boritz,
Shelley McMain, Alexandre Vaz, and Tony Rousmaniere.
Description: Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, [2023] |
Series: Essentials of deliberate practice | Includes bibliographical
references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2022024884 (print) | LCCN 2022024885 (ebook) |
ISBN 9781433837890 (paperback) | ISBN 9781433837906 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Dialectical behavior therapy. | Psychotherapists––Training
of. | BISAC: PSYCHOLOGY / Education & Training | PSYCHOLOGY /
Psychotherapy / General
Classification: LCC RC489.D48 B67 2023 (print) | LCC RC489.D48 (ebook) |
DDC 616.89/14––dc23/eng/20220716
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022024884
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2022024885
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-000
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
We dedicate this book to Marsha Linehan, who pioneered research in the field of person-
ality disorders and emotion dysregulation and the development of dialectical behavior
therapy. We are truly grateful to Marsha for what she has achieved for the field of mental
health. Her brilliant therapy has changed lives across the world, touching thousands of
people, families, health care professionals, and others impacted by borderline personality
disorder and other mental health problems related to emotion dysregulation.
Contents
Series Preface ix
Tony Rousmaniere and Alexandre Vaz
Acknowledgments xi
EXERCISE 2.
Validation 35
EXERCISE 3.
Reinforcing Adaptive Behaviors 47
EXERCISE 4.
Problem Assessment 57
vii
viii Contents
Comprehensive Exercises
EXERCISE 13.
Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice
Session Transcript 151
EXERCISE 14.
Mock Dialectical Behavior Therapy Sessions 165
Part III Strategies for Enhancing the Deliberate Practice Exercises 173
CHAPTER 3. How to Get the Most Out of Deliberate Practice: Additional Guidance
for Trainers and Trainees 175
References 203
Index 209
About the Authors 221
Series Preface
Tony Rousmaniere and Alexandre Vaz
We are pleased to introduce the Essentials of Deliberate Practice series of training books.
We are developing this book series to address a specific need that we see in many psy-
chology training programs. The issue can be illustrated by the training experiences of
Mary, a hypothetical second-year graduate school trainee. Mary has learned a lot about
mental health theory, research, and psychotherapy techniques. Mary is a dedicated
student; she has read dozens of textbooks, written excellent papers about psychotherapy,
and receives near-perfect scores on her course exams. However, when Mary sits with her
clients at her practicum site, she often has trouble performing the therapy skills that she
can write and talk about so clearly. Furthermore, Mary has noticed herself getting anxious
when her clients express strong reactions, such as getting very emotional, hopeless, or
skeptical about therapy. Sometimes this anxiety is strong enough to make Mary freeze at
key moments, limiting her ability to help those clients.
During her weekly individual and group supervision, Mary’s supervisor gives her
advice informed by empirically supported therapies and common factor methods. The
supervisor often supplements that advice by leading Mary through role-plays, recom-
mending additional reading, or providing examples from her own work with clients.
Mary, a dedicated supervisee who shares tapes of her sessions with her supervisor, is
open about her challenges, carefully writes down her supervisor’s advice, and reads
the suggested readings. However, when Mary sits back down with her clients, she often
finds that her new knowledge seems to have flown out of her head, and she is unable
to enact her supervisor’s advice. Mary finds this problem to be particularly acute with
the clients who are emotionally evocative.
Mary’s supervisor, who has received formal training in supervision, uses supervisory
best practices, including the use of video to review supervisees’ work. She would rate
Mary’s overall competence level as consistent with expectations for a trainee at Mary’s
developmental level. But even though Mary’s overall progress is positive, she experiences
some recurring problems in her work. This is true even though the supervisor is confident
that she and Mary have identified the changes that Mary should make in her work.
The problem with which Mary and her supervisor are wrestling—the disconnect
between her knowledge about psychotherapy and her ability to reliably perform
psychotherapy—is the focus of this book series. We started this series because most
therapists experience this disconnect, to one degree or another, whether they are
beginning trainees or highly experienced clinicians. In truth, we are all Mary.
ix
x Series Preface
To address this problem, we are focusing this series on the use of deliberate practice, a
method of training specifically designed for improving reliable performance of complex
skills in challenging work environments (Rousmaniere, 2016, 2019; Rousmaniere et al.,
2017). Deliberate practice entails experiential, repeated training with a particular skill
until it becomes automatic. In the context of psychotherapy, this involves two trainees
role-playing as a client and a therapist, switching roles every so often, under the guidance
of a supervisor. The trainee playing the therapist reacts to client statements, ranging in
difficulty from beginner to intermediate to advanced, with improvised responses that
reflect fundamental therapeutic skills.
To create these books, we approached leading trainers and researchers of major
therapy models with these simple instructions: Identify 10 to 12 essential skills for your
therapy model where trainees often experience a disconnect between cognitive knowl-
edge and performance ability—in other words, skills that trainees could write a good
paper about but often have challenges performing, especially with challenging clients.
We then collaborated with the authors to create deliberate practice exercises specif-
ically designed to improve reliable performance of these skills and overall responsive
treatment (Hatcher, 2015; Stiles et al., 1998; Stiles & Horvath, 2017). Finally, we rigorously
tested these exercises with trainees and trainers at multiple sites around the world and
refined them based on extensive feedback.
Each book in this series focuses on a specific therapy model, but readers will notice
that most exercises in these books touch on common factor variables and facilitative
interpersonal skills that researchers have identified as having the most impact on client
outcome, such as empathy, verbal fluency, emotional expression, persuasiveness, and
problem focus (e.g., Anderson et al., 2009; Norcross et al., 2019). Thus, the exercises
in every book should help with a broad range of clients. Despite the specific theoret-
ical model(s) from which therapists work, most therapists place a strong emphasis on
pantheoretical elements of the therapeutic relationship, many of which have robust
empirical support as correlates or mechanisms of client improvement (e.g., Norcross
et al., 2019). We also recognize that therapy models have already-established training
programs with rich histories, so we present deliberate practice not as a replacement
but as an adaptable, transtheoretical training method that can be integrated into these
existing programs to improve skill retention and help ensure basic competency.
This book in the series is on dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), an integrative behav-
ioral treatment used to treat individuals with severe emotional and behavioral dysreg-
ulation, such as borderline personality disorder. DBT training typically involves learning
the theories that underlie the DBT model, observing expert practice, experiential exer-
cises (e.g., role-playing), supervised clinical work, and participation on a DBT consulta-
tion team. Deliberate practice is intended as an additional piece designed to enhance
DBT training. It is not intended to be the only delivery format through which DBT skills
are acquired, nor is this book sufficient on its own for obtaining full proficiency in DBT.
However, the practice of the skills set forth in this book provides trainees with the
opportunity to translate their didactic learning of DBT to a simulated environment that
mimics the clinical interaction, which can later be applied with actual clients. This book
provides opportunities for trainees to experiment using DBT skills with a range of client
presentations and clinical scenarios; to practice what they would say and how they
would say it. We hope this book stimulates your interest and engagement in DBT and
supports your ongoing development as DBT therapists in training!
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Rodney Goodyear for his significant contribution to start-
ing and organizing this book series. We are grateful to Susan Reynolds, David Becker,
Elizabeth Budd, Emily Ekle, and Joe Albrecht at American Psychological Association (APA)
Books for providing expert guidance and insightful editing that has significantly improved
the quality and accessibility of this book. We also acknowledge the International Deliber-
ate Practice Society (IDPS) and its members for their many contributions and support for
our work. Finally, we are grateful for the invaluable editorial notes and feedback from Inês
Amaro, Amy DeSmidt, and Jamie Manser.
The exercises in this book underwent extensive testing at training programs around
the world. For all the pilot site leaders and trainees who volunteered to “test run” this
work and provided critically important feedback, we cannot thank you enough. We are
deeply grateful to the following supervisors and trainees, who tested exercises and/or
provided invaluable feedback:
xi
PA R T
Overview and
Instructions I
In Part I, we provide an overview of deliberate practice, including how it can be integrated
into clinical training programs for dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), and instructions
for performing the deliberate practice exercises in Part II. We encourage both trainers
and trainees to read both Chapters 1 and 2 before performing the deliberate prac-
tice exercises for the first time.
Chapter 1 provides a foundation for the rest of the book by introducing important concepts
related to deliberate practice and its role in psychotherapy training more broadly and
DBT training more specifically. We review three broad categories of DBT strategies:
acceptance-focused strategies, change-focused strategies, and dialectical strategies.
We also individually review the 12 skills included in the deliberate practice exercises.
Chapter 2 lays out the basic, most essential instructions for performing the DBT delib-
erate practice exercises in Part II. They are designed to be quick and simple and
provide you with just enough information to get started without being overwhelmed
by too much information. Chapter 3 in Part III provides more in-depth guidance, which
we encourage you to read once you are comfortable with the basic instructions in
Chapter 2.
1
ECXHEARPCTIESRE
1
Introduction and Overview
of Deliberate Practice and
Dialectical Behavior Therapy
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-001
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
3
4 Overview and Instructions
The main focus of the book is a series of exercises that have been thoroughly tested
and modified based on feedback from trainees and DBT clinicians and trainers. The first
12 exercises each represent an essential DBT strategy or skill. The last two exercises are
more comprehensive, consisting of an annotated DBT transcript and improvised mock
therapy sessions that teach practitioners how to integrate all these skills into more expan-
sive clinical scenarios. Table 1.1 presents the 12 skills that are covered in these exercises.
Throughout all the exercises, trainees work in pairs under the guidance of a super-
visor and role-play as a client and a therapist, switching back and forth between the
two roles. Each of the 12 skill-focused exercises consists of multiple client statements
grouped by difficulty—beginner, intermediate, and advanced—that call for a specific
skill. For each skill, trainees are asked to read through and absorb the description of
the skill, its criteria, and some examples of it. The trainee playing the client then reads
the statements, which portray a range of possible problems and emotional states typi-
cally seen in clients presenting for DBT. The trainee playing the therapist then responds
in a way that demonstrates the specified DBT skill. Trainee therapists will have the option
of practicing a response using the one supplied in the exercise or immediately improvising
and supplying their own.
After each client statement and therapist response couplet is practiced several times,
the trainees will stop to receive feedback from the supervisor. Guided by the super-
visor, the trainees will be instructed to try statement–response couplets several
times, working their way down the list. In consultation with the supervisor, trainees will
go through the exercises, starting with the least challenging and moving through to
more advanced levels. The triad (supervisor–client–therapist) will have the opportunity to
discuss whether exercises present too much or too little challenge and adjust up or down
depending on the assessment.
Trainees, in consultation with supervisors, can decide which skills they wish to work
on and for how long. On the basis of our testing experience, we have found practice
sessions last about 1 to 1.25 hours to receive maximum benefit. After this, trainees become
saturated and need a break.
Ideally, learners will both gain confidence and achieve competence by practicing
these exercises. Competence is defined here as the ability to perform a specific DBT
strategy or skill in a manner that is flexible and responsive to the client. Skills have been
chosen that are considered essential to DBT and that practitioners often find challenging
to implement.
TABLE 1.1. The 12 Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills Presented in the Deliberate
Practice Exercises
Beginner Skills Intermediate Skills Advanced Skills
1. Establishing a session 5. Eliciting a commitment 10. Coaching clients in
agenda 6. Inviting the client to distress
2. Validation engage in problem 11. Promoting dialectical
3. Reinforcing adaptive solving thinking through both–
behaviors 7. Skills training and statements
The skills identified in this book are not comprehensive in the sense of representing
all one needs to learn to become a competent DBT clinician. Some will present particular
challenges for trainees. A short history of DBT and a brief description of the delib-
erate practice methodology is provided to explain how we have arrived at the union
between them.
The primary goal of this book is to help trainees acquire and develop core DBT skills.
Therefore, the expression of that skill or competency may look somewhat different
across clients or even within a session with the same client.
The DBT deliberate practice exercises are designed to achieve the following:
1. Help learners develop the ability to apply the skills in a range of clinical situations.
2. Move the DBT strategies and skills into procedural memory (Squire, 2004) so that
learners can access them even when they are overwhelmed, stressed, or discouraged.
3. Provide learners with an opportunity to practice the DBT strategy or skill using a style
and language that is congruent with who they are.
4. Provide the opportunity to use the DBT strategy or skill in response to varying client
statements and affect. This is designed to build confidence to adopt skills in a broad
range of circumstances within different client contexts.
5. Provide DBT learners with many opportunities to fail and then correct their failed
response based on feedback. This helps build confidence and persistence.
Finally, this book aims to help trainees discover their own personal learning style so
that they can continue their professional development long after their formal training
is concluded.
2. The trainer can provide good demonstrations of how to use DBT strategies and skills
across a range of therapeutic situations, via role-play and/or video. Or the trainer
has access to examples of DBT being demonstrated through the many psychotherapy
video examples available (see McMain & Wiebe, 2013; Tullos et al., 2014; Yalom
et al., 2013).
3. The trainer can provide feedback to students regarding how to craft or improve their
application of DBT strategies and skills.
4. Trainees will have accompanying reading, such as books and articles, that explain the
theory, research, and rationale of DBT and each particular strategy and skill. Recom-
mended reading for each skill is provided in the sample syllabus (Appendix C).
6 Overview and Instructions
The exercises covered in this book were piloted in 15 training sites from across four
continents (North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania). The book is designed for trainers
and trainees from different cultural backgrounds worldwide.
This book is also designed for those who are training at all career stages, from begin-
ning trainees, including those who have never worked with real clients, to seasoned ther-
apists. All exercises feature guidance for assessing the adjusting of the difficulty to
precisely target the needs of each individual learner. The term “trainee” in this book
is used broadly, referring to anyone in the field of professional mental health who is
endeavoring to acquire skills in the DBT. For further guidance on how to improve multi-
cultural deliberate practice skills, see the forthcoming book Deliberate Practice in
Multicultural Therapy (Harris et al., 2022).
How does one become an expert in their professional field? What is trainable, and what
is simply beyond our reach due to innate or uncontrollable factors? Questions such
as these touch on our fascination with expert performers and their development. A
mixture of awe, admiration, and even confusion surround people such as Mozart, da Vinci,
or more contemporary top performers such as basketball legend Michael Jordan and
chess virtuoso Garry Kasparov. What accounts for their consistently superior profes-
sional results? Evidence suggests that the amount of time spent on a particular type of
training is a key factor in developing expertise in virtually all domains (Ericsson & Pool,
2016). Deliberate practice is an evidence-based method that can improve performance
in an effective and reliable manner.
The concept of deliberate practice has its origins in a classic study by K. Anders
Ericsson and colleagues (1993). They found that the amount of time practicing a skill
and the quality of the time spent doing so were key factors predicting mastery and
acquisition. They identified five key activities in learning and mastering skills: (a) observing
one’s own work, (b) getting expert feedback, (c) setting small incremental learning
goals just beyond the performer’s ability, (d) engaging in repetitive behavioral
rehearsal of specific skills, and (e) continuously assessing performance. Ericsson and his
colleagues termed this process deliberate practice, a cyclical process that is illustrated
in Figure 1.1.
Research has shown that lengthy engagement in deliberate practice is associated
with expert performance across a variety of professional fields, such as medicine,
sports, music, chess, computer programming, and mathematics (Ericsson et al., 2018).
People may associate deliberate practice with the widely known “10,000-hour rule”
popularized by Malcolm Gladwell in his 2008 book, Outliers, although the actual
number of hours required for expertise varies by field and by individual (Ericsson &
Pool, 2016). This, however, perpetuated two misunderstandings. The first is that this
is the number of deliberate practice hours that everyone needs to attain expertise, no
matter the domain. In fact, there can be considerable variability in how many hours
are required.
The second misunderstanding is that engagement in 10,000 hours of work perfor-
mance will lead one to become an expert in that domain. This misunderstanding holds
considerable significance for the field of psychotherapy, where hours of work experi-
ence with clients has traditionally been used as a measure of proficiency (Rousmaniere,
2016). Research suggests that the amount of experience alone does not predict therapist
Introduction and Overview of Deliberate Practice and Dialectical Behavior Therapy 7
Observe
Work
Assess Expert
Performance Feedback
Career-Long
Repetition
Small
Behavioral
Learning
Rehearsal
Goals
Note. Reprinted from Deliberate Practice in Emotion-Focused Therapy (p. 7), by R. N. Goldman, A. Vaz,
and T. Rousmaniere, 2021, American Psychological Association (https://doi.org/10.1037/0000227-000).
Copyright 2021 by the American Psychological Association.
effectiveness (Goldberg et al., 2016). It may be that the quality of deliberate practice
is a key factor.
Psychotherapy scholars, recognizing the value of deliberate practice in other fields,
have recently called for deliberate practice to be incorporated into training for mental
health professionals (e.g., Bailey & Ogles, 2019; Hill et al., 2020; Rousmaniere et al., 2017;
Taylor & Neimeyer, 2017; Tracey et al., 2015). There are, however, good reasons to ques-
tion analogies made between psychotherapy and other professional fields, like sports
or music, because by comparison psychotherapy is so complex and free form. Sports
have clearly defined goals, and classical music follows a written score. In contrast, the
goals of psychotherapy shift with the unique presentation of each client at each session.
Therapists do not have the luxury of following a score.
Instead, good psychotherapy is more like improvisational jazz (Noa Kageyama, as cited
in Rousmaniere, 2016). In jazz improvisations, a complex mixture of group collaboration,
creativity, and interaction is coconstructed among band members. Like psychotherapy,
no two jazz improvisations are identical. However, improvisations are not a random
collection of notes. They are grounded in a comprehensive theoretical understanding
and technical proficiency that is only developed through continuous deliberate practice.
For example, prominent jazz instructor Jerry Coker (1990) listed 18 skill areas that students
must master, each of which has multiple discrete skills including tone quality, intervals,
chord arpeggios, scales, patterns, and licks. In this sense, more creative and artful impro-
visations are actually a reflection of a previous commitment to repetitive skill practice and
acquisition. As legendary jazz musician Miles Davis put it, “You have to play a long time to
be able to play like yourself” (Cook, 2005, p. 112).
The main idea that we stress here is that we want deliberate practice to help therapists
learning DBT to feel comfortable bringing their unique personalities and styles into their
practice. The idea is to learn the skills so that you have them on hand when you want
them. Practice the skills to make them your own. Incorporate those aspects that feel
8 Overview and Instructions
right for you. Ongoing and effortful deliberate practice should not be an impediment to
flexibility and creativity. Ideally, it should enhance it. We recognize and celebrate that
psychotherapy is an ever-shifting encounter and by no means want it to become or feel
formulaic. Competent DBT therapists are able to use DBT skills adeptly while ensuring
responsiveness to the individual client and their context. The core DBT responses provided
are meant as templates or possibilities, rather than “answers.” Please interpret and apply
them as you see fit, in a way that makes sense to you. We encourage flexible and
improvisational play!
Let us turn to a little theoretical background on DBT to help contextualize the skills
of the book and how they fit into the greater training model.
The theoretical foundation of DBT integrates learning theory, Zen Buddhism, and dialec-
tical philosophy. Learning theory states that all behavior is learned and that behavioral
change occurs via the principles of learning. This is addressed through the DBT change
strategies, which include an emphasis on problem solving. Zen Buddhism contends that
suffering increases with attachment to things being a particular way and decreases
with the acceptance of reality and its limitations. This is addressed through the DBT
acceptance strategies, which include an emphasis on validation. At the core of treat-
ment is dialectical philosophy, which emphasizes the value of searching for and finding
syntheses between natural tensions to bring about change. In DBT, the central dialectic
involves striking a balance between change and acceptance; clients are encouraged,
on one hand, to acknowledge and accept emotional experience and, on the other, to
use a variety of strategies and skills to bring about behavioral change.
DBT conceptualizes pervasive emotion dysregulation as the core dysfunction under-
lying BPD and other clinical disorders associated with severe emotion dysregulation
problems (e.g., substance use, eating disorders). Emotion dysregulation refers to diffi-
culty effectively modulating and expressing emotion across a range of contexts. In its
extreme form, such as in the case of BPD, emotion dysregulation is pervasive, occurring
with frequency and intensity across many contexts. From a DBT perspective, dysfunc-
tion across multiple domains of functioning (cognitive, behavioral, interpersonal, self/
identity) is an inevitable consequence of dysregulated emotions, or maladaptive attempts
to cope with intense and distressing emotion (Linehan, 1993a, 1993b).
DBT’s biosocial theory posits that pervasive emotion dysregulation results from a
transaction between an individual’s biological predisposition toward emotional vulner-
ability and an invalidating environment that minimizes, ignores, or punishes emotion
expression and communicates to a person that their understanding of events and internal
experiences is wrong. Over time, this transaction leads to problems with emotion regula-
tion, including difficulties understanding, labeling, tolerating, and modulating emotional
responses; effectively communicating emotional needs; and effectively solving the prob-
lems contributing to emotional distress (Linehan, 1993a, 1993b). Problematic behaviors,
including extreme behaviors such as self-harm, suicide attempts, and substance use, are
seen as attempts to regulate emotion, or as the result of failed attempts to regulate
emotion. Over time, these behaviors become reinforced as avoidance or escape behaviors
from aversive emotional states.
While learning any new therapy approach can be a daunting task, even for the
brightest of students, it can be especially challenging for trainees learning DBT because
the therapy typically involves treating clients who are highly sensitive, reactive, and
impulsive. We have found this to be a little like learning under fire as our clients can
be unpredictable, and, more importantly, high risk behaviors can arise quickly. DBT
trainees are often required to adapt quickly to challenging clinical situations. This
requires an ability to simultaneously modulate one’s own emotional reactions while
fluidly employing a range of diverse treatment skills and techniques to appropriately
respond to the client and clinical context. DBT addresses these challenges by articu-
lating a set of principles therapists use to guide clinical decision making. These princi-
ples are designed to enhance therapist effectiveness and adherence to the treatment
10 Overview and Instructions
model while remaining flexible and responsive to the client. DBT therapists flexibly apply
treatment principles within a highly structured and comprehensive treatment program,
typically delivered via four modes of intervention: individual therapy, skills training group,
between-session phone coaching, and a consultation team for therapists.
In DBT, all treatment strategies directly or indirectly aim to decrease emotion dysreg-
ulation and associated maladaptive responses, and to enhance emotion regulation and
adaptive responses. Treatment strategies in DBT are dialectically balanced between
accepting the client as they are within a context of trying to teach them how to change
(i.e., use more effective coping strategies). Key DBT strategies include (a) acceptance
strategies focused on the adoption of a nonjudgmental therapeutic stance and the use
of validation (i.e., explicit communications about what makes sense about a client’s
responses), (b) change strategies focused on problem assessment and problem solving,
and (c) dialectical strategies focused on balancing acceptance and change-focused
strategies to address polarization and promote synthesis between opposing positions.
Most of the DBT skills embody a dialectical approach; this is reflected in the skills criteria
for the exercises in this book, most of which include both acceptance- and change-
focused responses.
Returning to the metaphor described earlier in this chapter, the practice of DBT—like
deliberate practice more broadly—has a lot in common with playing jazz. Similar to jazz
musicians, it is important for DBT therapists to be able to improvise and respond in an
agile and creative manner to rapidly evolving and sometimes unpredictable contexts.
Developing competence as a DBT therapist requires foundational knowledge in DBT
theory and a solid understanding of the principles underlying the treatment strategies, as
these form the basis on which a clinical decision to intervene one way or another is made.
Similar to other therapies, beginning training in DBT typically starts with didactic
learning, such as through reading treatment manuals and attending seminars and
workshops to develop a foundational theoretical understanding of the DBT model. As
training progresses, trainees begin practicing DBT with actual clients and focus shifts
to skill development both in the delivery of DBT techniques and in case formulation,
and feedback is provided via supervision or consultations as well as through direct
observation of therapy sessions. At all stages of training, there is a strong emphasis on
experiential practice. For example, trainees are expected to participate in role-plays,
practice DBT skills themselves, engage in mindfulness practice, and complete home-
work exercises.
Neither this book nor the deliberate practice method in general is intended to be
sufficient for obtaining competence in DBT on its own. The skills included in this book
are ideally embedded in a practicum course (see the sample syllabus in Appendix C).
Trainees should have prior or parallel exposure to DBT theory and application in dedi-
cated coursework and readings. In line with what we said earlier in this chapter, this
loosely reflects the distinction between declarative and procedural knowledge. The
DBT deliberate practice methods outlined in this book are not intended to be a primary
source of declarative knowledge or to replace or replicate work with actual clients or
training cases and case-based supervision (e.g., with review of actual session audio or
video). Nevertheless, we envision this book as being useful for DBT training and profes-
sional development at all levels. Deliberate practice methods can play a complementary
Introduction and Overview of Deliberate Practice and Dialectical Behavior Therapy 11
role in DBT training, in the service of augmenting core readings and work performance
with real clients. With this in mind, in Appendix C, we recommend resources that provide
more information about DBT principles, skills, and training for trainees at all stages of
development. Deliberate practice methods provide the first opportunity for a trainee to
translate their didactic learning of DBT to a simulated environment that mimics the clinical
interaction, which can later be applied with actual clients.
We have thus far provided a brief introduction to DBT and highlighted how deliberate
practice methods are particularly well-suited to the DBT paradigm. In the following
sections, we describe the categorization of different DBT skills and outline the skills that
will be the focus of the deliberate practice exercises in this book. In addition, we address
the importance of the therapeutic relationship in DBT.
The exercises in this text use a developmentally informed pedagogy in which more
advanced skills build on less advanced skills, as indicated in Table 1.1. The beginner
level exercises consist of the most basic DBT skills used in most sessions. Establishing
a session agenda (Exercise 1) is an essential element for structuring therapy time
and prioritizing a session focus. Problems are prioritized according to the degree to
which they impede the client’s quality of life: Therapy tasks focused on life-threatening
behavior take precedence over behaviors that interfere with the therapy itself, which
take precedence over other maladaptive behaviors that are interfering with the client’s
well-being. Validation (Exercise 2) is a core acceptance strategy that communicates to
a client that their responses make sense and are understandable in some way. Valida-
tion also involves a nonjudgmental therapeutic stance in which the therapist engages
with the client in a genuine and authentic manner, treating the client as equal and
capable and with respect. Reinforcement of adaptive behaviors (Exercise 3) is used to
strengthen adaptive behaviors, including gradual approximations toward behaviors the
client is trying to increase. Problem assessment (Exercise 4) is a core change strategy
that focuses on understanding the functional relationship between a behavior and its
antecedents and consequences.
The first of the intermediate exercises focuses on eliciting a commitment (Exercise 5),
which occurs when a therapist seeks explicit agreement from the client to work on mutu-
ally determined goals or engage in specific therapy tasks. Problem solving (Exercise 6)
12 Overview and Instructions
involves helping the client identify maladaptive responses or problem behaviors with
more skillful and effective responses. Problem solving includes generating, evaluating,
and implementing solutions for identified problems. One of these solutions may be skills
training (Exercise 7), which is used when the client has a deficit of coping skills and there-
fore needs support from the therapist to acquire and practice specific effective behaviors.
Another solution involves modifying cognitions (Exercise 8) to help the client enhance
their ability to observe and identify maladaptive thinking and its impacts, and then to
work towards changing or replacing cognitive errors or biases with more adaptive and
dialectical thinking. Informal emotional exposure (Exercise 9) is a solution used to address
emotional avoidance. Informal exposure involves helping clients understand the principles
of exposure and the adaptive function of emotions, focusing the client on their emotions
in the here and now, and encouraging them to experience their emotions without escape
or avoidance.
The advanced exercises are placed at the end because they require a deeper
understanding of DBT theory and principles and involve more complex skills for
managing higher risk client behaviors. All the skills in the advanced section build on
the earlier skills. Coaching clients in distress (Exercise 10) involves assisting clients
in crisis or moments of extreme emotional distress to effectively use skills to down
regulate intense emotion. Promoting dialectical thinking through both–and state-
ments (Exercise 11) weaves together validation and change strategies to help clients
shift polarized or extreme responses to more balanced, effective responses. Finally,
responding to suicidal ideations (Exercise 12) involves assessing and highlighting the
emotional problem driving the client’s thoughts of escape or avoidance and helping
the client consider more effective ways to solve the emotional problem driving their
suicidal thoughts.
DBT was originally developed as a treatment for people at chronic risk of suicide
(Linehan, 1993a, 1993b) and has been most extensively applied with adults with border-
line personality disorder engaging in self-harm and suicidal behaviors (Cristea et al.,
2017; Stoffers et al., 2012; Storebø et al., 2020). Although a growing literature has
now established DBT’s efficacy for a wide range of problems, many clients referred for
DBT engage in extreme behaviors associated with emotion dysregulation, including
suicidal thoughts, gestures, and actions. For this reason, we have provided client state-
ments referencing self-harm and suicidal ideation across all exercises that can help
DBT learners develop skills for responding more effectively when presented with these
issues in a therapy session.
It is important to note that these exercises alone are insufficient for competently
responding to and managing suicide risk. How a therapist responds to any single instance
of a self-harm and suicidal behavior should always be guided by and informed by the
client’s risk history, their current context and situation, a personalized case formulation
that includes an understanding of the function of self-harm and suicidal behaviors for
the client, and the therapeutic relationship. At all stages of training, supervision and
consultation should be sought when determining how best to respond and intervene
if your client expresses suicidal ideation or discloses self-harm or suicidal behavior.
For additional resources on managing suicide risk in DBT, supervisors and learners
may wish to familiarize themselves with the Linehan risk assessment and management
protocol (LRAMP; Linehan, 2016). The LRAMP is an empirically supported framework
that is commonly used in DBT for assessing, managing, and documenting suicide risk. It
Introduction and Overview of Deliberate Practice and Dialectical Behavior Therapy 13
A strong therapeutic relationship is central to DBT and is the primary vehicle for engaging
clients in treatment and increasing motivation and willingness to change (Linehan,
1993a, 1993b). DBT therapists strive to engage with their clients with warmth, compassion,
and acceptance. Additionally, DBT therapists are encouraged to be fully present to
the client and the unfolding therapy process, including being awake to subtle shifts in
the client in-session or in the therapist’s own reactions or behaviors toward the client.
Adopting an open, curious, and nonjudgmental stance can help therapists remain
balanced and less reactive in the face of challenging situations. This promotes trust in
the relationship and engagement in therapy, which in turn allows the client to be open
to emotional experiencing and expression as well as new learning experiences and
problem solving. These qualities are conveyed both verbally (e.g., through the use of
validation) and also through nonverbal and paralinguistic cues, such as vocal quality,
tone, and posture. For further discussion of the therapeutic relationship in DBT, learners
may wish to review additional writing, such as Bedics et al. (2012a, 2012b, 2015), Boritz
et al. (2023), Rizvi (2011), and Shearin and Linehan (1992).
This book is organized into three parts. Part I contains this chapter and Chapter 2, which
provides basic instructions on how to perform these exercises. We found through testing
that providing too many instructions upfront overwhelmed trainers and trainees, and
they skipped past them as a result. Therefore, we kept these instructions as brief and
simple as possible to focus only on the most essential information that trainers and
trainees will need to get started with the exercises. Further guidelines for getting the
most out of deliberate practice are provided in Chapter 3, and additional instructions
for monitoring and adjusting the difficulty of the exercises are provided in Appendix A.
Do not skip the instructions in Chapter 2, and be sure to read the additional guide-
lines and instructions in Chapter 3 and Appendix A once you are comfortable with the
basic instructions.
Part II contains the 12 skill-focused exercises, which are ordered based on their
difficulty: beginner, intermediate, and advanced (see Table 1.1). They each contain a
brief overview of the exercise, example client–therapist interactions to help guide
trainees, step-by-step instructions for conducting that exercise, and a list of criteria
for mastering the relevant skill. The client statements and sample therapist responses
are then presented, also organized by difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced).
The statements and responses are presented separately so that the trainee playing the
therapist has more freedom to improvise responses without being influenced by the
sample responses, which should only be turned to if the trainee has difficulty impro-
vising their own responses. The last two exercises in Part II provide opportunities to
practice the 12 skills within simulated psychotherapy sessions. Exercise 13 provides a
sample psychotherapy session transcript in which the DBT skills are used and clearly
labeled, thereby demonstrating how they might flow together in an actual therapy
session. DBT trainees are invited to run through the sample transcript with one playing
the therapist and the other playing the client to get a feel for how a session might
14 Overview and Instructions
unfold. Exercise 14 provides suggestions for undertaking mock sessions, as well as client
profiles ordered by difficulty (beginner, intermediate, and advanced) that trainees can
use for improvised role-plays.
Part III contains Chapter 3, which provides additional guidance for trainers and trainees.
While Chapter 2 is more procedural, Chapter 3 covers big-picture issues. It highlights
six key points for getting the most out of deliberate practice and describes the impor-
tance of appropriate responsiveness, attending to trainee well-being and respecting
their privacy, and trainer self-evaluation, among other topics.
Three appendixes conclude this book. Appendix A provides instructions for moni-
toring and adjusting the difficulty of each exercise as needed. It provides a Deliberate
Practice Reaction Form for the trainee playing the therapist to complete to indicate
whether the exercise is too easy or too difficult. Appendix B includes a Deliberate Prac-
tice Diary Form that can be used to during a training session’s final evaluation to process
the trainees’ experiences, but its primary purpose is to provide trainees a format to
explore and record their experiences while engaging in additional, between-session
deliberate practice activities without the supervisor. Appendix C presents a sample
syllabus demonstrating how the 12 deliberate practice exercises and other support
material can be integrated into a more comprehensive DBT training course. Instructors
may choose to modify the syllabus or pick elements of it to integrate into their own
courses.
Downloadable versions of this book’s appendixes, including a color version of the
Deliberate Practice Reaction Form, can be found in the “Clinician and Practitioner
Resources” tab at https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-
behavior-therapy.
ECXHEARPCTIESRE
2
Instructions for the Dialectical
Behavior Therapy Deliberate
Practice Exercises
This chapter provides basic instructions that are common to all the exercises in this
book. More specific instructions are provided in each exercise. Chapter 3 also provides
important guidance for trainees and trainers that will help them get the most out of delib-
erate practice. Appendix A offers additional instructions for monitoring and adjusting the
difficulty of the exercises as needed after getting through all then client statements in a
single difficulty level, including a Deliberate Practice Reaction Form the trainee playing
the therapist can complete to indicate whether they found the statements too easy
or too difficult. Difficulty assessment is an important part of the deliberate practice
process and should not be skipped.
Overview
The deliberate practice exercises in this book involve role-plays of hypothetical situations
in therapy. The role-play involves three people: one trainee role-plays the therapist,
another trainee role-plays the client, and a trainer (professor/supervisor) observes and
provides feedback. Alternatively, a peer can observe and provide feedback.
This book provides a script for every role-play, each with a client statement and an
example therapist response. The client statements are graded in difficulty from beginning
to advanced, although these difficulty grades are only estimates. The actual perceived
difficulty of client statements is subjective and varies widely by trainee. For example,
some trainees may experience a stimulus of a client being angry to be easy to respond
to, whereas another trainee may experience it as very difficult. Thus, it is important
for trainees to provide difficulty assessments and adjustments to ensure that they are
practicing at the right difficulty level: neither too easy nor too hard.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-002
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
17
18 Overview and Instructions
Time Frame
• First 20 minutes: Orientation. The trainer explains the dialectical behavior therapy
(DBT) skill and demonstrates the exercise procedure with a volunteer trainee.
• Middle 50 minutes: Trainees perform the exercise in pairs. The trainer or a peer
provides feedback throughout this process and monitors/adjusts the exercise’s
difficulty as needed after each set of statements (see Appendix A for more
information about difficulty assessment).
Preparation
2. Each exercise requires the trainer to fill out a Deliberate Practice Reaction Form after
completing all the statements from a single difficulty level. This form is available in
the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab at https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/
deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy and in Appendix A.
3. Trainees are grouped into pairs. One volunteers to role-play the therapist and one
to role-play the client (they will switch roles after 15 minutes of practice). As noted
previously, an observer who might be either the trainer or a fellow trainee will work
with each pair.
1. Provide corrective feedback, which includes both information about how well the
trainees’ response met expected criteria and any necessary guidance about how to
improve the response.
2. Remind trainees to do difficulty assessments and adjustments after each level of client
statements is completed (beginning, intermediate, and advanced).
How to Practice
Each exercise includes its own step-by-step instructions. Trainees should follow these
instructions carefully, as every step is important.
Skill Criteria
Each of the 12 exercises focuses on one essential DBT strategy or skill with one to three
skill criteria that describe the important components or principles for that skill.
Instructions for the Dialectical Behavior Therapy Deliberate Practice Exercises 19
The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses to the
client statement in a manner that (a) is attuned to the client, (b) meets skill criteria
as much as possible, and (c) feels authentic for the trainee. Trainees are provided
scripts with example therapist responses to give them a sense of how to incorporate
the skill criteria into a response. It is important, however, that trainees do not read the
example responses verbatim in the role-plays! Therapy is highly personal and improvi-
sational; the goal of deliberate practice is to develop trainees’ ability to improvise within
a consistent framework. Memorizing scripted responses would be counterproductive for
helping trainees learn to perform therapy that is responsive, authentic, and attuned to
each individual client.
Tali Boritz and Shelley McMain wrote the scripted example responses; however,
trainees’ personal style of therapy may differ slightly or greatly from that in the example
scripts. It is essential that, over time, trainees develop their own style and voice, while
simultaneously being able to intervene according to the model’s principles and strate-
gies. To facilitate this, the exercises in this book were designed to maximize opportuni-
ties for improvisational responses informed by the skill criteria and ongoing feedback.
For example, in “Modifying Cognitions” (Exercise 8), scripted example responses were
designed to focus more on cognitions. In “Informal Exposure to Emotions” (Exercise 9),
scripted example responses were designed to focus more on emotions. However,
for each of the client statements in these skills exercises, there might be a range of
appropriate therapist responses using skills developed in other exercises. Similarly, in
an actual therapy session, there may be several equally effective ways a DBT therapist
can respond to their client. While working your way through the skills exercises, it can
be helpful to consider both how to practice a specific skill and the alternative skills you
could potentially use to respond to each client statement. In this way, there’s a unique
opportunity to strengthen the use of specific skills, while developing flexibility and
responsiveness.
The review and feedback sequence after each role-play has these two elements:
• First, the trainee who played the client briefly shares how it felt to be on the
receiving end of the therapist’s response. This can help assess how well trainees
are attuning with the client.
• Second, the trainer provides brief feedback (less than 1 minute) based on the skill
criteria for each exercise. Keep feedback specific, behavioral, and brief to pre-
serve time for skill rehearsal. If one trainer is teaching multiple pairs of trainees,
the trainer walks around the room, observing the pairs and offering brief feed-
back. When the trainer is not available, the trainee playing the client gives peer
feedback to the therapist, based on the skill criteria and how it felt to be on the
receiving end of the intervention. Alternatively, a third trainee can observe and
provide feedback.
Trainers (or peers) should remember to keep all feedback specific and brief and not
to veer into discussions of theory. There are many other settings for extended discussion
of DBT theory and research. In deliberate practice, it is of utmost importance to maximize
time for continuous behavioral rehearsal via role-plays.
20 Overview and Instructions
Final Evaluation
After both trainees have role-played the client and the therapist, the trainer provides an
evaluation. Participants should engage in a short group discussion based on this evalu-
ation. This discussion can provide ideas for where to focus homework and future delib-
erate practice sessions. To this end, Appendix B presents a Deliberate Practice Diary
Form, which can also be downloaded from the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab
at https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy.
This form can be used as part of the final evaluation to help trainees process their experi-
ences from that session with the supervisor. However, it is designed primarily to be used
by trainees as a template for exploring and recording their thoughts and experiences
between sessions, particularly when pursuing additional deliberate practice activities
without the supervisor, such as rehearsing responses alone or if two trainees want to
practice the exercises together—perhaps with a third trainee filling the supervisor’s role.
Then, if they want, the trainees can discuss these experiences with the supervisor at the
beginning of the next training session.
PA R T
II
Deliberate Practice Exercises
for Dialectical Behavior
Therapy Skills
This section of the book provides 12 deliberate practice exercises for essential dialec-
tical behavior therapy (DBT) skills. These exercises are organized in a developmental
sequence, from those that are more appropriate to someone just beginning DBT training
to those intended for individuals who have progressed to a more advanced level.
Although we anticipate that most trainers would use these exercises in the order we
have suggested, some may find it more appropriate to their training circumstances to
use a different order. We also provide two comprehensive exercises that bring together
the DBT skills using an annotated DBT session transcript and mock DBT sessions.
Comprehensive Exercises
EXERCISE 13: Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice Session Transcript 151
EXERCISE 14: Mock Dialectical Behavior Therapy Sessions 165
23
EXERCISE
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-003
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
25
26 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
highest priority behaviors are therapy-interfering behaviors, which refer to any client
or therapist behavior that impedes the client’s progress in treatment or compromises
the therapy relationship (e.g., attendance issues, not completing homework, lack of
collaboration). The third highest priority are behaviors that interfere significantly with
the client’s quality of life (e.g., substance use, relationship issues, housing). Although
more than one target behavior is frequently addressed in a therapy session, when time
is tight or a problem is complex, the higher priority target takes precedence (Linehan,
1993a, 1993b). Clients are oriented to the treatment hierarchy in the pretreatment
phase of DBT.
Although setting an agenda and establishing a treatment focus help to organize
the session, this process is done in collaboration with the client; their input should be
directly solicited, and the agenda should be based on values-driven goals they are
motivated to work toward. When using this skill, the therapist should maintain a stance
of curiosity, openness, flexibility, and acceptance.
Example 1
CLIENT: [Crying] I had the worst week. I got in a big fight with my boyfriend and ended
up self-harming.
THERAPIST: Sounds like a really hard week. I’d like to hear more about what led to the
self-harm. (Criterion 1) But let me check in with you—what would you like to put on the
agenda for today? (Criterion 2)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Neutral] I don’t really have anything to talk about this week. Nothing happened.
I spent most of the week just avoiding everything.
THERAPIST: Maybe we can put that on the agenda? I’d like to hear more about what you
were avoiding and why. (Criterion 1) How does that sound? (Criterion 2)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Shame] I didn’t do my homework. Every time I tried to do it, I felt overwhelmed.
THERAPIST: It’s so great you tried to do it. I wonder if it would be helpful to spend some
time talking about what happened when you tried to do the homework? (Criterion 1) I’m
also curious what you would like to focus on today? (Criterion 2)
Establishing a Session Agenda 27
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Establishing a Session Agenda 29
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
30 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Establishing a Session Agenda 31
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
Validation 2
Preparations for Exercise 2
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form
at https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
Validation is the core acceptance strategy in dialectical behavior therapy (DBT). Validation
is used to communicate acceptance and to help clients understand that their responses
make sense and are understandable in some way. When people feel invalidated (e.g.,
when we are told our descriptions or understandings of our internal experiences are
wrong, or our responses are due to undesirable or unacceptable character traits), it is
common for emotional arousal to increase. Many DBT clients have a history of pervasive
invalidation and are emotionally vulnerable; as a result, they may be particularly sensi-
tive to invalidation both outside of and within therapy sessions. A heightened state of
emotional arousal can interfere with information processing, new learning, and problem
solving—necessary requirements for therapeutic change. Validation is therefore essen-
tial in DBT for multiple reasons: It (a) decreases emotional arousal, (b) helps clients learn
to trust their responses, (c) makes problem solving possible, and (d) strengthens the
therapeutic alliance.
Validation is conveyed both through a general therapeutic stance and as a set of
communication strategies. A validating therapeutic stance involves engaging with the
client in a genuine and nonjudgmental manner. Validation is also an explicit communication
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-004
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
35
36 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
regarding what makes sense about the client’s thoughts, feelings, or actions. Validation
can be communicated by accurately reflecting or summarizing the client’s expressed
thoughts, emotions, and urges (“You felt really angry when your friend cancelled plans”);
it also includes articulations of those aspects of the client’s internal experience that
are unverbalized (“It sounds like in addition to feeling angry at your friend, you were
also feeling quite hurt”). Validation can also be communicated by contextualizing the
client’s responses given their past learning, history, biology, and cognitive style or by
identifying what makes sense about their responses in light of their current situation or
normative responding.
It is essential that therapists only validate what makes sense about the client’s response
and avoid validating the invalid. For example, a client may respond to a nagging parent
by yelling and screaming at them until they back off. In this case, the therapist could
validate that many people might find a nagging parent irritating and the desire to want
to end an unpleasant encounter is understandable, while highlighting that yelling and
screaming may not be the most effective way to solve the problem.
COMMON MISTAKES
1. The therapist interacts in an overly professional manner or fragilizes the client.
2. The therapist reinforces the client with praise instead of validation.
3. The therapist is misattuned to the client (e.g., doesn’t understand the essence
of the client’s response).
4. The therapist validates the invalid (i.e., aspects of the client’s response that are
ineffective or incompatible with their long-term goals).
Validation 37
Examples of Validation
Example 1
CLIENT: [Frustrated] You’re not listening to me. This is hard! I just want to leave this
session.
THERAPIST: I can see how frustrated you are. (Criterion 1) It makes sense you might want
to leave, if you are feeling like I’m not listening to you or helping you solve your problem.
(Criterion 2)
Common Therapist Mistake 1: The therapist fragilizes the client: I’m so sorry I made
you feel that way. It makes sense you want to leave the session.
Example 2
CLIENT: [Sad] I don’t have any friends. I have nobody. I’m just going to kill myself.
THERAPIST: Wow, it sounds like you’re feeling really alone and hopeless. (Criterion 1) I can
understand how your thoughts might go to killing yourself if you think that’s the only way
to get relief from your misery. (Criterion 2)
Common Therapist Mistake 2: The therapist reinforces the client with praise instead
of using validation: It’s so great you’re sharing that with me! It must have been so hard
to tell me that.
Example 3
CLIENT: [Ashamed] I didn’t complete my diary card. You’re probably pissed I forgot again.
THERAPIST: You look like you’re feeling a lot of shame right now. (Criterion 1) I can imagine
feeling pretty upset if I thought my therapist was going to be mad at me. (Criterion 2)
Common Therapist Mistake 3: The therapist is misattuned to the client (e.g., doesn’t
understand the essence of what is being communicated): It can be really difficult to
complete the diary card. Sounds like you’re feeling pretty disappointed in yourself.
Example 4
CLIENT: [Angry] My mom just wouldn’t stop nagging me. I asked her to leave me alone,
but she just kept going. So I got really in her face and screamed at her. I think I scared
her. Whatever. She backed off.
THERAPIST: It sounds like your emotions were getting pretty intense in that situation and
you were looking for a way to end the situation. I can totally understand feeling irritated
or overwhelmed and wanting to stop whatever is setting off those feelings. (Criterion 1)
It sounds like in that way, your screaming at your mom helped solve that problem in the
short term. (Criterion 2)
Common Therapist Mistake 4: The therapist validates the invalid: You were so angry.
It makes sense you lost control and screamed at her. Anyone might have that response
if they were in that situation.
38 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
40 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Validation 41
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
42 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-005
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
47
48 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Example 1
CLIENT: [Withdrawn] I’m just feeling done with everything. Everything’s a battle, and I’m
exhausted. It took everything in me just to come in today.
THERAPIST: I am so glad you did come, especially given how exhausted you’re feeling.
Example 2
CLIENT: [Ashamed] Sometimes I get so frustrated with myself that I hit myself to feel a
bit better. I tried to do some of the skills we talked about last week, but they didn’t seem
to help much.
THERAPIST: It’s great you tried to use skills—that’s a step in the right direction. We can
spend some time today figuring out what was helpful and what was not so helpful about
those skills.
Example 3
CLIENT: [Frustrated] You’re not listening to me. This is hard! I just want to leave this
session.
THERAPIST: I really appreciate you telling me how you’re feeling and that you are having
the urge to leave the session.
Reinforcing Adaptive Behaviors 49
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Reinforcing Adaptive Behaviors 51
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
52 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Reinforcing Adaptive Behaviors 53
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
Problem Assessment 4
Preparations for Exercise 4
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
Problem solving is the core dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) change strategy. Problem
solving involves (a) understanding problems as they occur and (b) seeking to address
them with alternative and more adaptive solutions. Problem assessment is the first
step in this process. The goal of problem assessment is to ascertain the function of a
specific problem behavior. Once insight into the problem behavior is achieved, the
client and therapist proceed to the next problem-solving task, which includes generating
and implementing problem solutions (e.g., skills training, exposure-based techniques,
cognitive modification).
The behavioral chain analysis is the main tool used in problem assessment. A behav-
ioral chain analysis is used to obtain a detailed understanding of the antecedents and
consequences (i.e., the controlling variables) of a discrete episode of a specific behavior
to determine what factors need to be problem solved. Controlling variables include
contextual factors that link (a) antecedents and the problem behavior (i.e., vulnera-
bility factors; prompting events; cognitions, emotions, actions, sensations) and (b) the
problem behavior and its consequences (i.e., the internal and environmental responses
that follow the problem behavior).
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-006
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
57
58 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
COMMON MISTAKES
1. The therapist responds in a global or vague manner.
2. The therapist makes assumptions about the client’s problem.
3. The therapist engages in problem solving without clearly specifying the
problem that needs to be addressed.
4. The therapist’s tone and language demand an explanation of the problem (i.e.,
why the person responded the way they did) rather than cultivating curiosity in
the client to understand and increase awareness.
Example 1
CLIENT: [Neutral] I didn’t fill in my diary card. I thought about it, though.
THERAPIST: It sounds like you thought about your diary card this week, but something got
in the way of actually completing it. (Criterion 1) What got in the way of filling out the
diary card this week? (Criterion 2)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Ashamed] I totally screwed up at work. I let my anger get out of control.
THERAPIST: It sounds like something happened at work that got you angry. (Criterion 1)
When you say your anger got out of control, what exactly did you do? (Criterion 2)
Problem Assessment 59
Common Therapist Mistake 2: The therapist makes assumptions about the client
problem: It sounds like your anger is a big problem and leading to all sorts of negative
outcomes in your life.
Example 3
CLIENT: [Angry] When you say that, it’s like you’re telling me I’m lying.
THERAPIST: It sounds like something I said is making you think I don’t believe you.
(Criterion 1) What was it about what I said or how I came across to you right now that
made you think that? (Criterion 2)
Example 4
CLIENT: [Anxious] I didn’t go to group this week. I just didn’t feel like it.
THERAPIST: You had group this week but didn’t go. (Criterion 1) Can you tell me more
about what you mean when you say you didn’t feel like going? (Criterion 2)
Common Therapist Mistake 4: The therapist’s tone and language demand an explana-
tion of the problem: Why didn’t you go?
60 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
62 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Problem Assessment 63
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
64 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
Eliciting a Commitment 5
Preparations for Exercise 5
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
In dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), therapists actively seek explicit and collaborative
agreement from the client to work toward mutually determined goals. An important task
of DBT therapists is to help clients increase their motivation to make changes, particularly
in moments when ambivalence or reluctance to change is high. Motivation and commit-
ment naturally fluctuate over time, and when this occurs, the therapist’s role is to help
the client reconnect to their original commitment and a renewed effort to change.
Commitment strategies are used to help clients make an explicit intention to change,
which increases the likelihood of taking action on a plan. When working to enhance
motivation and commitment, therapists must be careful not to impose their own goals
on the client or to demand their clients commit to a goal they had previously endorsed.
Although there are a wide range of commitment strategies therapists can use in DBT,
for the purposes of this exercise, we focus mainly on the practice of eliciting a commit-
ment via checking in with the client about their willingness to work on a specific goal,
use a particular skill, or their engage in a particular therapeutic task.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-007
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
69
70 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Example 1
CLIENT: [Guilty] I’ve been feeling really bad about how I’ve been treating my partner. Lately
I’m just finding everything he says very annoying, and I can’t stop myself from starting
fights with him that just escalate.
THERAPIST: It sounds like in moments where you’re feeling really annoyed, you’re finding
that you can’t control your anger. (Criterion 1) I’m wondering if you’re interested in under-
standing your reaction and trying to figure out ways not to lose your cool even if you are
irritated with your partner? (Criterion 2)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Ashamed] Sometimes I get so frustrated with myself that I hit myself to feel a
bit better.
THERAPIST: It sounds like you’re overwhelmed with self-criticism and frustration and hitting
yourself is the only way you can think of to relieve the intensity of this state. (Criterion 1)
Are you willing to work with me to find more helpful ways to deal with your self-criticism
that don’t involve hitting yourself? (Criterion 2)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Worried] I’m so worried that I won’t be able to pay my bills next month, and I
don’t even know what I can do about it. It’s overwhelming, and honestly I just want to
give up and kill myself.
THERAPIST: It sounds like there’s a lot going on right now that’s leaving you feeling help-
less and your mind is escaping into thoughts of suicide. (Criterion 1) Are you willing to
work together to find ways to not act on suicide thoughts and to help you feel more in
control? (Criterion 2)
Eliciting a Commitment 71
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Eliciting a Commitment 73
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
74 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Eliciting a Commitment 75
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-008
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
79
80 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Example 1
CLIENT: [Neutral] I didn’t fill in my diary card. Every time I looked at it, I felt overwhelmed.
THERAPIST: It sounds like when you started doing the diary card, some intense emotions
got activated, and it brought some relief to stop doing the diary card. (Criterion 1) Would
you like some help figuring out how to manage those overwhelming feelings rather than
avoiding them? (Criterion 2)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Ashamed] I totally screwed up at work. I let my anger get out of control and
yelled at my boss.
THERAPIST: That’s too bad. It sounds like something happened that set off your anger and
once it was activated, it was hard to control those anger behaviors. (Criterion 1) Perhaps
we can spend some time today figuring out some skills to help interrupt anger urges
when your emotion is really high. What do you think about that? (Criterion 2)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Angry] When you say that, it’s like you’re telling me I’m lying. I just want to leave
right now.
THERAPIST: I can see you’re feeling frustrated with me right now. I’m thinking that leaving
the session might be one way of managing that feeling. (Criterion 1) I wonder if you want
some help bringing the intensity of that feeling down a bit, so we can talk more about
what I said or did that made you feel like I didn’t believe you. (Criterion 2)
Inviting the Client to Engage in Problem Solving 81
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Inviting the Client to Engage in Problem Solving 83
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
84 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Inviting the Client to Engage in Problem Solving 85
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
Skills Training 7
Preparations for Exercise 7
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
Skills training is used in problem solving when a solution requires skills not currently
in a client’s behavioral repertoire (e.g., when the client does not yet have the ability
to generate or effectively produce a specific behavior). An essential aim of dialectical
behavior therapy (DBT) is to help clients replace ineffective or maladaptive behaviors
with skillful or effective responses. The use of the term effective in this context refers
to the consequences of the behavior—for example, behaviors that lead to “a maximum
of positive outcomes with a minimum of negative outcomes” (Linehan, 1993a, p. 329).
During skills training in DBT, the therapist highlights opportunities for the client to
actively engage in the acquisition and practice of skills.
Although a range of coping skills are used in DBT skills training, for the purposes of
this exercise, we focus on two specific DBT skills: (a) the core mindfulness “what” skills
for enhancing awareness of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors (including action urges);
and (b) the distress tolerance STOP skills for noticing when an emotion is high and
accompanied by urges to act impulsively on ineffective behaviors.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-009
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
89
90 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Mindfulness Skills
The STOP skill is used when a person is in crisis or a moment of intense distress. This skill
is used to help clients get through a crisis without engaging in problematic behaviors
that will make the situation worse. The STOP skill is a mnemonic device that stands for:
Stop (i.e., freeze in your tracks, don’t move, don’t react), Take a step back (i.e., take
some time to calm down and think), Observe (i.e., notice what is happening around
you and within you), and Proceed mindfully (i.e., ask yourself what you want from the
situation, remind yourself of your goals, and evaluate which responses will make the
situation better or worse).
Example 1
CLIENT: [Neutral] I didn’t fill in my diary card. Every time I looked at it, I felt overwhelmed.
So I just stopped.
THERAPIST: It sounds like when you started doing the diary card some intense emotions
got activated, and it brought you some relief to just stop doing the diary card. (Criterion 1)
While avoiding your diary card will bring relief to uncomfortable emotions in the short
term, learning to stay with and tolerate your emotions without escaping them will be
more effective in the long term. (Criterion 2)
Skills Training 91
Option 1: Next time you’re doing your diary card, it may be helpful to use the mindful-
ness skills to observe the emotions and urges that come up. What do you think about
that? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: The STOP skills might be a perfect skill to use in moments when your emo-
tions are high and you’re feeling tempted to do something that may not be helpful.
(Criterion 3)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Ashamed] I totally screwed up at work. I let my anger get out of control and
yelled at my boss.
THERAPIST: That’s too bad. It sounds like something happened that set off your anger and
once it was activated it was hard to control those anger behaviors. (Criterion 1) It might
be helpful in this case to work on feeling your emotions without acting on the urges
associated with them, so as not to make the situation worse in the moment. (Criterion 2)
Option 1: Would you like some help using mindfulness skills to notice the intensity of
your anger and the urges to act from this emotion? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Would you like some help using the STOP skills when your anger is high so
that you don’t act impulsively and engage in anger behaviors? (Criterion 3)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Angry] It feels like you’re telling me I’m lying. I just feel like leaving right now.
THERAPIST: I can see you’re feeling frustrated with me right now. I’m thinking that leaving
the session might be one way of managing that feeling. (Criterion 1) If we can help you
bring the intensity of that feeling down a bit, we might be able to talk more about what
I said or did just now that made you feel like I wasn’t believing you. (Criterion 2)
Option 1: Can you use mindfulness skills to notice the emotions and urges coming up
for you right now? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Would you be willing to use the STOP skill right now to interrupt that urge
to leave? (Criterion 3)
92 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
94 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Skills Training 95
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
96 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
Option 1: Would you like some help using mindfulness skills to notice the emotion
underneath those judgments? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Would you like some help using the STOP skill if that helplessness feeling
starts activating urges to act in an unhelpful way? (Criterion 3)
Option 1: Would you want some help observing your urges? We could practice noticing
when urges come up and then shifting your attention elsewhere, to other things around
you in the room. (Criterion 3)
Option 2: If you ultimately decide to go to the bar, there’s a good chance your urges
are going to get activated. Would you like help practicing how to use the STOP skill in
that situation to interrupt urges to drink? (Criterion 3)
Option 1: I’m wondering if we can work on helping you observe those thoughts and
then shift your attention away from them so that you feel more comfortable in group.
(Criterion 3)
Option 2: I’m wondering if we can work on helping you use the STOP skill in moments
in group where you are about to act on urges to quit? (Criterion 3)
Option 1: During these arguments with your mother, it would be really helpful to use
mindfulness skills to observe your anger and to notice when it’s starting to get really
overwhelming so you can intervene. (Criterion 3)
Option 2: When you have these strong urges to yell, this would be a perfect moment
to use the STOP skill. (Criterion 3)
Skills Training 97
Option 1: Are you willing to try to use mindfulness skills right now to observe and
describe the emotions driving your urge to quit right now? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Are you willing to try the STOP skill to get your emotions down before mak-
ing any big decision about your job? (Criterion 3)
98 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Option 1: Can you see if you can just notice those worry thoughts and shift your
attention away from them? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Are you willing to try the STOP skill to get some space between your
emotions and your urge to remove yourself from this treatment? (Criterion 3)
Option 1: Let’s see if we can get you to practice noticing when you’re getting sucked
into an emotion and instead shift focus to what’s going on around you.
(Criterion 3)
Option 2: Let’s see if we can get you to practice the STOP skill when your emotions
start to escalate. (Criterion 3)
Option 1: I think it would help if you practiced observing your urges, almost like
watching your urges as though they are waves flowing onto the beach. (Criterion 3)
Option 2: I think it would help if you practiced using the STOP skill when your urges to
use pot increase. (Criterion 3)
Option 1: Do you want help mindfully noticing those thoughts and paying attention to
the feelings and urges that are coming up without acting on them? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: I think it would be helpful right now to practice the STOP skill, to slow things
down so you can make a mindful decision about what you need. (Criterion 3)
Option 1: I think using mindfulness skills right now might help you take a step back from
intense emotion instead of making an impulsive decision. (Criterion 3)
Option 2: The STOP skill might be really helpful right now in giving you some space
between your emotions and that intense urge to make a quick decision. (Criterion 3)
Skills Training 99
Option 2: This would be a great situation to practice the STOP skill. (Criterion 3)
Option 1: Can you use mindfulness skills right now to notice all your judgments and let
them go? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Can you use the STOP skill right now to intervene around your irritation and
interrupt urges to lash out at me? (Criterion 3)
Option 1: Let’s see if we can help you use mindfulness skills to observe and describe
the emotions underlying those self-harm urges. (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Let’s see if we can help you use the STOP skill to interrupt the urge to act on
self-harm. (Criterion 3)
Option 1: What if instead of disengaging we helped you observe and describe what
you’re feeling right now and the urges accompanying those feelings? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: What if instead of disengaging we helped you use the STOP skill to interrupt
that urge to withdraw? (Criterion 3)
Option 1: Are you willing to use mindfulness skills right now to observe those painful
feelings underneath your anger? (Criterion 3)
Option 2: Are you willing to use the STOP skill right now? If you can use this skill,
I think it will be easier to develop the relationships that you want with other people.
(Criterion 3)
EXERCISE
Modifying Cognitions 8
Preparations for Exercise 8
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
One of the primary tasks of a dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) practitioner is to search
for and reinforce a client’s valid thoughts, interpretations, and beliefs (e.g., through
validation strategies). Another task of the DBT therapist is to highlight and address
cognitive processes that are contributing to dysfunctional behaviors or maladaptive
emotional experiences. By modifying cognitions, DBT therapists help clients observe
and change faulty rules governing behavior (e.g., beliefs, underlying assumptions,
expectations), nondialectical thinking (e.g., rigid, dichotomous, or extreme thinking),
dysfunctional descriptions (e.g., judgments or evaluations), and problematic atten-
tional processes (e.g., rumination). When working with the client to modify cogni-
tions, the therapist’s role is to help clients enhance their ability to identify and observe
patterns of dysfunctional thinking and to generate functional and accurate thinking and
appraisals of situations.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-010
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
101
102 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Example 1
CLIENT: [Anxious] I don’t really know anyone who will be at this party. I know I’ll be mis-
erable and have a terrible time.
THERAPIST: You’re pretty convinced this party will be terrible. (Criterion 1) Since you’re
having that thought, no wonder you don’t want to go. (Criterion 2) Would you like some
help interrupting those worry thoughts? (Criterion 3)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Angry] My group leader completely dismissed me. She treated me like I was
disrupting the group and completely ignored my very legitimate concerns about the
mindfulness homework. Screw her—I’m not going back to that group.
THERAPIST: It sounds like you have a lot of assumptions about the therapist’s intention
toward you. (Criterion 1) Do you notice that this assumption leads you to want to avoid
people? (Criterion 2) Do you want some help challenging that assumption? (Criterion 3)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Sad] I don’t have any friends. I’m such a worthless loser. The world would be
better off without me.
THERAPIST: Wow, it seems like your judgments of yourself are pretty strong right now.
(Criterion 1) Do you notice that when you’re especially judgmental about yourself, it influ-
ences your mood, and your thoughts get more extreme? (Criterion 2) Do you want some
help letting go of judgments? (Criterion 3)
Modifying Cognitions 103
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Modifying Cognitions 105
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
106 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Modifying Cognitions 107
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
Many clients in dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) experience fear of their emotions and
the responses that may accompany them. Clients might fear their emotions due to
messages received from the developmental environment discouraging or punishing
the experience or expression of certain emotions. Alternatively, some clients may believe
nothing good comes from letting oneself feel negative or aversive emotion. As a result,
clients may try to avoid them by blocking their experience of them, particularly nega-
tive emotions such as shame, anger, fear, guilt, and sadness. When emotional cues
are consistently avoided and the experience of emotion inhibited, this reinforces the
client’s belief that emotions are intolerable and unmanageable. When this occurs, the
client loses touch with the adaptive information associated with their primary emotional
experience. Additionally, they lose opportunities for learning adaptive coping strate-
gies for expressing and experiencing emotion.
One of the main goals of DBT is to help clients learn to experience, tolerate, and effec-
tively express their emotional needs, without interrupting or blocking the emotions
they are feeling. Broadly speaking, informal exposure to emotion helps clients learn to
tolerate aversive emotion without escaping or avoiding it. Informal exposure involves
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-011
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
111
112 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
helping clients understand the principles of exposure and the adaptive function of
emotions, focusing the client on their emotions in the here and now and encouraging
them to experience their emotions without escape or avoidance. Information exposure can
also include helping the client block action tendencies associated with problem emotions
(e.g., lashing out when angry, hiding when ashamed, cutting when overwhelmed).
Example 1
CLIENT: [Guilty] I’ve been feeling really guilty about how I’ve been treating my partner.
I don’t know if there’s anything to do about it, maybe I’m just a jerk.
THERAPIST: It sounds like you’re feeling guilty about how you’ve been treating your
partner. (Criterion 1) It makes sense that you’re feeling guilty if you think you’ve done
something that’s hurt your partner. (Criterion 2) Instead of moving into judging yourself,
I wonder if you might try staying with those feelings of guilt. (Criterion 3)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Ashamed] Sometimes I get so frustrated with myself that I hit myself to feel a bit
better. I’m feeling so embarrassed even telling you about this.
THERAPIST: It sounds like talking to me about your self-harm brings up shame. (Criterion 1)
It makes sense you’re feeling shame if you’re thinking I might judge or reject you.
(Criterion 2) Sharing your feelings of embarrassment instead of hiding from them is a
great way of decreasing its intensity in the long run. (Criterion 3)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Sad] I don’t know if I can talk about what happened. I can’t talk about it without
crying hysterically. I’d rather shut it down and avoid.
THERAPIST: I’m hearing that a lot of sadness gets activated when you talk about what
happened, and there’s an urge to just push it down and not feel it. (Criterion 1) It makes
sense you would want to push those feelings away as the pain is so hard to feel. (Criterion 2)
I’m wondering if rather than pushing away from those feelings, you can do the opposite
and focus on feeling that sadness? (Criterion 3)
Informal Exposure to Emotions 113
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Informal Exposure to Emotions 115
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
116 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Informal Exposure to Emotions 117
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
We have previously discussed the importance of skills training for helping clients acquire
new and more adaptive coping skills for addressing emotion dysregulation and prob-
lematic behaviors (see Exercise 7). One context in which skills training can be partic-
ularly helpful is in assisting clients in crisis or moments of extreme emotional distress.
In these moments, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) clinicians can coach clients to
effectively use distress tolerance skills to down-regulate emotion such that the person
is able to refocus their attention and engage in problem solving. When coaching clients
in distress, it is important to pay attention to the client’s affect rather than the content
of the crisis. Validation strategies (Exercise 2) can then be used to reflect the client’s
emotional responses and their validity. Next, the therapist can encourage the client to
use a skill in that moment to tolerate their negative affect without escaping it via prob-
lematic behaviors or secondary emotions. While validation on its own can contribute
to a decrease in the intensity of painful emotions, coaching clients to use skills provides
additional instruction on strategies that can be used in future crisis situations.
Although there is a range of DBT skills that can be used when coaching clients in
distress, for the purposes of this exercise, we focus on distress-tolerance TIPP skills:
temperature, intense exercise, paced breathing, and paired muscle relaxation. TIPP skills
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-012
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
121
122 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
are used when a person is in crisis or in a moment of high distress. These skills are intended
to bring down the intensity of an emotion to a level where the client is able to cope with
difficult situations and feelings more effectively. The TIPP skills have the effect of rapidly
changing biological response patterns, leading to a reduction in emotional arousal.
Temperature involves changing the temperature of your face using cold water or ice while
holding your breath (e.g., dunking your head in a bowl of ice-cold water, putting an ice pack
or cold compress on your face, splashing cold water on your face). This induces the human
dive reflex, which slows down your heart rate and reduces physiological and emotional
arousal very quickly. Intense exercise involves engaging in a high-intensity workout to
help your body get rid of the negative energy that can sometimes be stored from strong
emotions. Intense exercise also leads to the natural release of endorphins, which can help
combat any negative emotions such as anger, anxiety, or sadness. Intense exercise can
include running, walking at a fast pace, or doing jumping jacks. Paced breathing helps the
body relax by slowing down inhalations and exhalations. Our bodies naturally relax when
we breathe out, so if we can slow our breathing down and breathe out for longer than we
breathe in then we will start to relax. Paired muscle relaxation involves deep breathing
while slowly tensing each body muscle group then relaxing.
Example 1
CLIENT: [Intense anger] I’m so angry at my boss. I just want to quit my job.
THERAPIST: Your anger is really intense, and your impulse is to do something abrupt like
quit work. (Criterion 1) I’m wondering if we can do some paced breathing together right
now to bring your anger down, so we can then think together about whether quitting
work is the most effective decision. (Criterion 2)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Distressed] I don’t know what I’m going to do. I’m in so much debt, my parents
are going to kill me when they find out.
THERAPIST: You sound really worried. (Criterion 1) I’m wondering if you want to grab an
ice pack right now and put it on your face? It might help you bring your anxiety down so
we can figure out how to help you address this problem. (Criterion 2)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Suddenly appears tuned out] It’s hard for me to think clearly right now. I think
I’m beginning to dissociate.
THERAPIST: You look like you’re getting emotionally overwhelmed right now and I can see
it’s hard to focus. (Criterion 1) Can we help you be more present? I’m wondering if doing
some jumping jacks may help reduce your intense emotions? (Criterion 2)
Coaching Clients in Distress 123
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Coaching Clients in Distress 125
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
126 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Coaching Clients in Distress 127
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
One of the primary goals of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is to increase dialectical
thinking and to help clients shift typically extreme emotions and behaviors to more
balanced, effective responses. In DBT, the therapist pushes for change in the client
while helping the client accept their emotional experience and those aspects of their
reality that cannot be changed. One way that DBT therapists support their clients in
this endeavor is by using dialectical strategies to balance problem-solving solutions
that are oriented toward change with acceptance-focused solutions that are oriented
toward helping clients tolerate reality as it is (Sayrs & Linehan, 2019). These two seem-
ingly opposing positions are balanced through the adoption of a dialectical stance (i.e.,
embraces the view that therapists can simultaneously hold the positions of accepting
the client as they are and moving them toward change) as well as through a set of
dialectical communication strategies. When taking a dialectical approach, validation
and change strategies are woven together so that both are conveyed in communica-
tion with the client.
When the therapist identifies rigid or extreme thinking (i.e., nondialectical thinking),
they highlight how both sides of an issue can be true. For example, a client may use
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-013
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
131
132 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
substances to help escape distressing flashbacks of past traumatic events. The validity
of this behavior is that it solves the problem of ending or numbing aversive experiences.
On the other hand, substance use creates other problems for the client that further
exacerbate their pain and suffering. In this scenario, the therapist may use dialectical
communication to highlight to the client that it makes sense they want to escape painful
emotions in the moment and that they need to develop skills for effectively managing
flashbacks to decrease pain over the long run. For this exercise, we focus on using
“both–and” language to reframe polarizing or extreme statements or to highlight
seemingly opposed parts of a client statement that are equally true and valid.
Example 1
CLIENT: [Sad] Things are just so hard right now. I’m coming to therapy, trying to make
these big changes, but I’m struggling day to day.
THERAPIST: You are working really hard to get better, and it’s really difficult.
Example 2
CLIENT: [Frustrated] I can’t believe you’re going on vacation next week. You won’t be
there for me if I need you.
THERAPIST: Yes, it would be better for you if I were not going away next week and it’s OK
that I’m going away next week.
Example 3
CLIENT: [Ashamed] If you understood how much pain I’m in, you wouldn’t ask me to stop
cutting. Cutting is the only relief I can get right now.
THERAPIST: Cutting brings you relief and it maintains your pain in the long run.
Promoting Dialectical Thinking Through Both–And Statements 133
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Promoting Dialectical Thinking Through Both–And Statements 135
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
136 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Promoting Dialectical Thinking Through Both–And Statements 137
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and Deliberate Practice Diary Form at
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab; also available in Appendixes A
and B, respectively).
Skill Description
Many people who are struggling with severe emotion dysregulation may engage in self-
harm and suicidal behavior. The treatment of individuals with suicidal behaviors requires
a structured protocol to guide response. For the purposes of this exercise, we will be
focusing on how to respond specifically to suicidal ideation (i.e., thoughts of death, urges
to die).
For many clients, suicidal ideation often occurs in contexts where psychological pain
feels unbearable or never ending. In such circumstances, suicide can be understood as
a desire to avoid or end “intolerable, unendurable, unacceptable anguish” (Shneidman,
1992, p. 54). Therefore, one essential therapeutic task is to assess and highlight the
emotion pain or problem that is driving a client’s suicidal thoughts. Once the therapist
has identified the emotional problem that is driving the client’s suicidal thoughts, they
should next discuss alternative solutions to the problematic situation. This may include
tolerating the painful emotion they are experiencing (e.g., using distress tolerance
skills) or using problem-solving skills to address the situation (e.g., via solution analysis).
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-014
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
141
142 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
It is essential to note here that how a therapist responds to any single instance of
a suicidal behavior should always be informed by information about the client’s risk
history, the client’s case formulation, their specific context and situation, and the thera-
peutic relationship. At all stages of training, supervision and consultation should be sought
when determining how best to respond and intervene if your client expresses suicidal
ideation or discloses suicidal behavior.
Example 1
CLIENT: [Ashamed] I tried using skills, but this week it was just too hard. It’s just too
much. I can’t live like this.
THERAPIST: It sounds like you’re feeling overwhelmed. (Criterion 1) Suicide seems like
the only way to manage these feelings. (Criterion 2) Although suicide may seem like the
only solution, I’m thinking we can find a more effective way of helping you manage your
distressing feelings right now. (Criterion 3)
Example 2
CLIENT: [Sad] I don’t have any friends. I have nobody. I really want to just kill myself.
THERAPIST: It sounds like you’re really struggling with some overwhelming feelings of
aloneness (Criterion 1) and that your brain is going toward thoughts of suicide to cope
with these feelings. (Criterion 2) I’m wondering if you want my help figuring out other
ways to help you feel less alone? (Criterion 3)
Example 3
CLIENT: [Withdrawn] I’m just feeling done with everything. Everything’s a battle, and I’m
exhausted. I want to give up and end it—I need a break.
THERAPIST: You sound emotionally exhausted. (Criterion 1) It sounds like the real issue
underlying your thoughts of suicide is a desire to find relief from these feelings. (Criterion 2)
I know that this is hard, and I want to help you find some alternative ways of finding some
relief right now. (Criterion 3)
Responding to Suicidal Ideation 143
Step 2: Repeat
• Repeat Step 1 for all the statements at the current difficulty level (beginner,
intermediate, or advanced).
➔ Now it’s your turn! Follow Steps 1 and 2 from the instructions.
Remember: The goal of the role-play is for trainees to practice improvising responses
to the client statements in a manner that (a) uses the skill criteria and (b) feels authentic
for the trainee. Example therapist responses for each client statement are provided
at the end of this exercise. Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses
before reading the example responses.
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
Responding to Suicidal Ideation 145
Assess and adjust the difficulty before moving to the next difficulty level
(see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
146 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
Assess and adjust the difficulty here (see Step 3 in the exercise instructions).
If appropriate, follow the instructions to make the exercise even more
challenging (see Appendix A).
Responding to Suicidal Ideation 147
Remember: Trainees should attempt to improvise their own responses before reading
the example responses. Do not read the following responses verbatim unless you are
having trouble coming up with your own responses!
13
Annotated Dialectical
Behavior Therapy Practice
Session Transcript
It is now time to put together all the skills you have learned! This exercise presents a
transcript from a dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) session. Each therapist statement
is annotated to indicate which DBT skill from Exercises 1 through 12 is used. This tran-
script provides an example of how therapists can interweave many different DBT skills
in response to clients.
Instructions
As in the previous exercises, one trainee plays the client, while the other plays the
therapist. As much as possible, the trainee who plays the client should try to adopt
an authentic emotional tone as if they were a real client. The first time through, both
partners can read verbatim from the transcript. After one complete run-through, try it
again. This time, the client can read from the script while the therapist can improvise to
the degree that they feel comfortable. At this point, you may also want to reflect upon
it with a supervisor and go through it again. Before you start, it is recommended that
both the therapist and the client read the entire transcript through on your own, until
the end. The purpose of the sample transcript is to give trainees the opportunity to
try out what it is like to offer the DBT responses in a sequence that mimics live therapy
sessions.
Note to Therapists
Remember to be aware of your vocal quality. Match your tone to the client’s
presentation. Thus, if the clients present vulnerable, soft emotions behind their
words, soften your tone to be soothing and calm. If clients on the other hand, are
aggressive and angry, match your tone to be firm.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-015
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
151
152 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
THERAPIST 1: Nice to see you today. Do you have your diary card?
CLIENT 1: [pulls out diary card from bag and passes it to therapist]
THERAPIST 2: Thank you. [reading over diary card] It looks like suicide urges were really
high this week, yeah? OK and there was self-harm on most days but not all days. It looks
like after our session you had really high urges to use, to quit, and to self-harm. That
seems like something important for us to talk about. What do you think? What would you
like to talk about today? What’s on your agenda? (Skill 1: Establishing a Session Agenda)
CLIENT 2: [looks nervous, feet are pointing inward, and hands are together at the center]
In group they were talking about the STOP skill, and I just find like there’s no way for me
to pause when I’m feeling messed up. Something just triggers me too fast and I’m not
sure how to slow it down to be able to use something like that.
THERAPIST 3: OK, so it sounds like learning about that skill got you thinking about what
happens in situations for you, and you’re feeling like it’s so automatic that it’s hard to
actually imagine introducing a pocket of time where you could do something differently.
(Skill 2: Validation)
THERAPIST 4: OK, so let’s definitely focus on that because you’re right—it’s really hard.
It is hard to slow things down when it feels like something just happens automatically.
(Skill 2: Validation) Even though it may feel automatic, sometimes there’s a way to slow
things down just enough. I have some ideas about how to do that, so perhaps we can
put that on the agenda. If we have time, I’d also like to talk about what’s been happening
in our sessions that leaves you feeling more vulnerable afterward and sets off those high
urges. Does that sound OK to you? (Skill 1: Establishing a Session Agenda)
THERAPIST 5: So, where do you want to begin? What would be the most helpful place for
you to begin? (Skill 1: Establishing a Session Agenda)
THERAPIST 6: Maybe we can start by talking about the self-harm from last week and how
to slow things down when you’re feeling those really high urges to self-harm? (Skill 1:
Establishing a Session Agenda)
THERAPIST 8: OK, is there one incident that happened this week that you think would be
a good example for us to focus on? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 8: [pausing, hands together, playing with fingers] Um, with my friend. We were
at her house, she said something, and I got really upset and I just like . . . I don’t know, it
happens a lot where someone will say something and I would just freak out. And I would
Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice Session Transcript 153
just go straight to like “I hate them,” and then I am thinking about suicide after something
that wasn’t even a big deal, but it just happens so fast that I don’t even understand.
THERAPIST 9: OK, so you were at your friend’s house and something happened that made
you feel really upset and led to thoughts of suicide. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1) Can
you tell me a bit more about what happened with your friend? Did she say something or
do something that upset you? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment)
CLIENT 9: Um, she had to go out to do something and when she came back, I hadn’t
cleared the dishes from the table and she got upset that I should’ve done that.
THERAPIST 10: OK. Did she say something to you? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 11: OK, so your friend said she was disappointed. Did she say anything else?
(Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 12: How did she say it? Was she yelling? Was her voice raised? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 13: So she said she was disappointed with you? Or she said you hadn’t cleared
the table? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 14: OK. And then what happened? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 14: I was just like, I was just so angry, I was like . . .
THERAPIST 15: Angry? Was that the emotion you were feeling most strongly in that
moment? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 16: What was the anger about? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 16: I didn’t think it was fair that she was upset.
THERAPIST 17: What did you think was unfair about it? What was unfair about her being
upset about you not clearing the table? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 17: Because it wasn’t like something I was supposed to do. It was something
I could’ve done but I didn’t really notice, and she obviously thought I didn’t do it because
I was lazy.
THERAPIST 18: So it sounds like you felt like you were being judged. (Skill 2: Validation,
Criterion 1) Were there other emotions involved, other than anger? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment)
THERAPIST 19: OK, what was the hurt about? Do you have a sense? What did you feel hurt
about? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 20: And how did that make you feel hurt? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment,
Criterion 2)
CLIENT 20: Because I don’t like it when other people are upset with me.
THERAPIST 21: Yeah, that makes sense. I think it’s hard. I mean I don’t like it when other
people are upset with me either. (Skill 2: Validation) But can you say more about the hurt?
Like, “When I think of hurt, I think of sadness.” (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 1)
Does that fit for you?
CLIENT 21: Um, just, it goes really fast and I am just like “I hate you.” I just want to break
stuff.
THERAPIST 22: OK, so there were urges to break stuff and to tell her you hated her. (Skill 2:
Validation, Criterion 1) Did you actually tell her that you hated her? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment)
CLIENT 22: No, at that point I was by myself, it was just like anger and thinking I hate her.
THERAPIST 23: OK. So, it sounds like, if I’m understanding it correctly, your friend came
home and was upset that you hadn’t cleared the table, which then upset you because
that wasn’t something you thought was your responsibility to do. (Skill 2: Validation) It
wasn’t something you were aware of or thought about doing, and that prompted dis-
tress. Is that correct? Am I understanding that correctly? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment,
Criterion 1)
CLIENT 23: Yeah, maybe because I didn’t go in the kitchen while she was out, so I didn’t
even really notice the dishes.
THERAPIST 24: OK, and it sounds like you were thinking she was disappointed that you
didn’t clear the table and that left you feeling hurt and angry. It sounds like you were feel-
ing angry because it didn’t feel fair that she was upset with you because you didn’t really
think you had done anything wrong, and this led to urges to break stuff and lash out.
(Skill 2: Validation; Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions, Criteria 1 and 2) What happened after
that? What happened after you felt those urges? Did you express any of those feelings to
your friend? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment)
CLIENT 24: [pause] I didn’t go and tell her that I was angry, but she could see that I was.
THERAPIST 25: How could she see you were angry? What was she noticing? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 26: Ah, that’s too bad. You had the urge to break stuff and then you did it, you
did break some stuff. What were you throwing? (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1; Skill 4:
Problem Assessment)
THERAPIST 27: Oh, sorry, I misunderstood. So what were you throwing? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 27: I don’t know, just stuff around the room . . . I was just angry.
THERAPIST 28: Ah, OK, so you were feeling angry and started throwing stuff around the
room. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1) Were there other anger behaviors that you were
doing? Yelling, or swearing, or doing anything like that? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment)
Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice Session Transcript 155
CLIENT 28: [pause] Um, I don’t remember. But someone said I pushed her.
THERAPIST 30: And then what happened? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 30: I was just like, fuming, I hated her so much and then I was—I just wanted to die.
THERAPIST 32: So when did that happen? Was that after you were throwing stuff or was
that in between? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 33: OK, so you were feeling so angry and had thoughts of wanting to die. (Skill 2:
Validation, Criterion 1) How did you get to burning yourself? What was the link there? You
were having thoughts “I hate her so much” and “I want to die” and . . . and then how did
you get to burning yourself? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment; Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions,
Criteria 1 and 2)
THERAPIST 34: OK, so your distress went up, your pain went up. (Skill 2: Validation,
Criterion 1) And how did you get to burning yourself as a solution? What was the
connection—how did you decide to do that? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment)
THERAPIST 35: OK, so that was part of it, the thought “I can’t handle these thoughts.” (Skill 2:
Validation) Were there any other thoughts you are aware of? (Skill 4: Problem Assess-
ment; Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions, Criterion 1)
THERAPIST 36: And then what happened? Where did you hurt yourself? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 38: And then what happened? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 39: You were still angry at your friend. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1) Were you
less angry? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 40: It really hurt. Then I saw her, and she wasn’t angry at me anymore. She asked
me something and wasn’t angry at me anymore.
156 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
THERAPIST 41: Were you still angry at her? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 42: You were still angry. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1) What were you still
angry about? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 43: And did you tell her that, or did you keep it in? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment,
Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 44: When we started today’s session, one of your questions was how do you
find a way to introduce some kind of pause so that you can stop the urges—or not stop
the urges necessarily, but stop the actions that go with the urges. It sounds like it can feel
like a big blur once the process gets started, it’s like your emotions are a runaway train a
bit. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1; Skill 6: Problem Solving, Criterion 1) No wonder it feels
in the moment like it’s all happening automatically. (Skill 2: Validation)
THERAPIST 45: OK, so listening to all this, I have a couple of ideas about how to do that.
But one thought I’m having . . . I’m wondering a bit about hurt and sadness, and if those
were the feelings that were causing you pain, even though the anger was the one that
you felt more strongly. It was really painful to have your friend be upset with you. (Skill 2:
Validation) But I’m also wondering if there was another emotion in the mix. Was there
shame that got activated? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment)
THERAPIST 46: OK. So it’s almost like when you feel ashamed, it’s so hard to feel it. Almost
unbearable. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1) Maybe anger feels a little bit easier than shame
to manage in some ways. (Skill 6: Problem Solving, Criterion 1) I don’t know . . . does that
sound like it fits? [pause]
THERAPIST 47: OK, so it was almost like the first things you felt were shame and sadness
and then anger kind of took over, which felt a little bit better than feeling such intense
shame. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1) I wonder if instead of having to sit with that feeling
that your friend was upset with you—or that maybe you had done something wrong—it
was easier in a way to get angry at your friend for making you feel that way. (Skill 6:
Problem Solving, Criterion 1) I don’t know, does that fit for you? What are your thoughts
about that?
CLIENT 47: [pause] Yeah, I think that happens a lot. And I get confused because I’m not
sure if she’s right or I’m right.
THERAPIST 48: Right, because the shame gets set off and it’s so painful and there’s this
part of you that’s like, “Wait a minute—I didn’t do anything wrong, I don’t deserve this
feeling.” It makes sense that you might feel angry if you’re having the thought “How dare
you make me feel this way, I feel so bad right now and I didn’t even do anything wrong.”
(Skill 2: Validation)
CLIENT 48: Yeah, like blaming her for making me feel bad.
Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice Session Transcript 157
THERAPIST 49: So, what’s kind of cool about us being able to identify this. [pause] (Skill 3:
Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Hmm . . . I’m looking at you and noticing you’ve sort of
sunken into your chair and I can’t see your face anymore. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1)
I’m guessing it’s hard to talk about this stuff with me? I am wondering if the shame is
activated right here right now. Is it happening right now? (Skill 9: Informal Exposure to
Emotion, Criterion 1)
THERAPIST 50: OK, I am so glad that you just made eye contact with me because that was
the perfect way of acting the opposite to shame. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior)
How intense is the shame right now? On a scale from 1 to 10? (Skill 9: Informal Exposure
to Emotion, Criterion 1)
THERAPIST 51: OK, the shame is really high right now. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1)
Why don’t you try taking a few deep breaths to see if that helps bring the emotion
down a bit? (Skill 10: Coaching Clients in Distress—Criterion 2, Paced Breathing skill)
THERAPIST 53: OK, so it makes sense that shame got activated because we started talking
about something that made you feel vulnerable (Skill 2: Validation) and, I don’t know,
maybe embarrassed? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2) Is there anything else you
can do right now to just connect to that painful feeling without escaping it? (Skill 9: Infor-
mal Exposure to Emotion; Skill 6: Inviting the Client to Engage in Problem Solving) If the
feeling is getting too intense, you can try picking up that ice pack and holding it to your
temple (Skill 10: Coaching Clients in Distress—Criterion 2, Temperature skill)
CLIENT 53: [slight nod; picks up ice pack and applies it to their temple]
THERAPIST 54: OK, so what I would like you to do is, when you’re noticing that shame feel-
ing coming up, try to just notice it, without judging it or trying to change it. (Skill 7: Skills
Training—Mindfulness) Shame is a feeling that says, “I have done something wrong, and
I am bad.” For a lot of people, it’s a feeling that’s learned—not actually related to what
you did. It makes sense that that feeling might come up if you’re having thoughts like
that. (Skill 2: Validation) Is anything like that happening for you right now?
THERAPIST 55: Maybe. What do you think you have done wrong? (Skill 4: Problem Assess-
ment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 55: I’m thinking maybe you think I did something wrong too. Maybe you think that
I should’ve put the dishes away too.
THERAPIST 56: Ah, so you’re having the worry thought that maybe I’m judging you as well
and thinking that you should’ve done something differently. (Skill 2: Validation, Criterion 1;
Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions, Criterion 1) That’s a painful thought to have. If I thought my
therapist was judging me, I’d probably be feeling a lot of shame too. (Skill 2: Validation;
Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions, Criteria 1 and 2)
158 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
THERAPIST 57: I’m wondering . . . do you want to check in with me about that? Do you
want to check that out with me directly? To see if I am actually thinking that? (Skill 6:
Problem Solving, Criterion 2; Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions, Criterion 3)
THERAPIST 58: No, OK. It sounds like it feels too much right now. (Skill 2: Validation, Crite-
rion 1) Is the shame going up even at the thought of having to say that? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 59: OK, so what can you do to bring yourself back into the present moment
with me—to notice those worry thoughts and to try to interrupt them? (Skill 8: Modifying
Cognitions, Criterion 3) Do you want to check in with me visually? (Skill 6: Problem Solving,
Criterion 2) I’m wondering if looking at me might help. Because right now your eyes are
down, and it’s probably helping bring that shame down a bit and easier to stay stuck in
those worry thoughts. (Skill 11: Promoting Dialectical Thinking Through Both–And State-
ments) If you can, can you look at me? Shame might get more intense, and if you can
try to stay with the feeling without escaping or avoiding it. (Skill 9: Informal Exposure to
Emotion)
THERAPIST 60: Good—you’re doing great. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Now, if
you can, can you try to describe what you see? What is my face doing? What does my
voice sound like? What words am I saying?
THERAPIST 61: That’s great. Keep those eyes on me if you can. (Skill 9: Informal Exposure
to Emotion) Do I look like I am angry or disappointed? Do I look upset at you? Do I sound
upset at you?
THERAPIST 62: OK, well that’s important information to pay attention to. Sometimes we
can have thoughts or really strong feelings about what’s happening that are different
from what actually is happening. Does that make sense? That you can feel an emotion
really strongly, and it might be valid—like it might make sense given the thoughts you’re
having, or given past experiences—but it might not totally fit what’s actually happening
in the moment? (Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions)
THERAPIST 63: Given some of the things you’ve told me about how you grew up, it sounds
like there were a lot of times you got told you were doing something wrong, or when
people got angry at you for no reason, and it makes perfect sense to me that that fear
comes up now. With other people, but also with me—that at any moment I’m going to
turn around and blame you for something. (Skill 2: Validation) Does that make sense to
you? That it’s like perfectly natural to have that fear or concern if that was the message
you got growing up. (Skill 2: Validation)
THERAPIST 64: So even here in our sessions, it sounds like it sort of comes up automatically
before you’ve even had the chance to notice the emotion or think it through. (Skill 4:
Problem Assessment, Criterion 2) What are you feeling right now as we are talking? (Skill 9:
Informal Exposure to Emotion, Criterion 1)
THERAPIST 66: Ah, OK. I think I understand that too. Does it sound like a criticism? Like
I’m saying you’re doing something wrong here by feeling that way? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 67: OK, so I think maybe that’s the shame getting activated again. (Skill 9:
Informal Exposure to Emotion, Criterion 1) Like maybe it’s feeling like I’m saying you
should be doing something differently?
CLIENT 67: Yeah, like I’m not supposed to think that way. Like there’s something wrong
with me. When I start feeling that way, I just want to die. It’s like, what’s the point? I’m
so broken.
THERAPIST 68: Mmm . . . yeah that feeling is so intense, almost unbearable. It sounds like
thinking about being dead brings some relief to that painful feeling. No wonder your
mind goes there. (Skill 2: Validation) I’d like to work with you to find a better way to find
relief from your pain. Is that something you would want? (Skill 12: Responding to Suicidal
Ideation; Skill 5: Eliciting a Commitment)
CLIENT 68: Yes. I don’t want to feel this way all the time.
THERAPIST 69: I’m really glad to hear you say that. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior)
You know, it’s interesting. It sounds like what set off those thoughts were feelings of
shame that I was judging you. (Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions, Criteria 1 and 2) I was
actually having a completely different thought. What I am thinking right now is that it’s
pretty fantastic you’ve been able to identify those thoughts and feelings and talk to me
about them even though it’s been hard, because now we can actually work on this stuff
together. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior)
THERAPIST 70: I’m wondering if this is something you would be willing to work on with
me? Trying to notice what you’re thinking or feeling without judging or criticizing it? Is
that something you would be willing to practice? (Skill 5: Eliciting a Commitment; Skill 6:
Problem Solving)
THERAPIST 71: That’s great. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Something we can
also continue working on down the road is getting you to not just notice when an
emotion like shame comes up, but to then ask yourself if it’s related to something
that’s happening here and now, or if it’s an old response, an automatic response, which
makes sense given your history but either doesn’t fit or it’s too intense for the present
situation.
160 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
THERAPIST 72: Yes, I’m sure it will be hard at first. It’s not easy to catch these automatic
responses. And I saw you begin to do it today, so I feel really confident that if you keep
working at it, it’ll get easier to do. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior)
THERAPIST 73: So, I’m wondering if we can turn our focus back to self-harm. You said that
after that fight with your friend you burned yourself. We kind of worked through how
your emotions got so intense and led to urges to self-harm. You also mentioned that you
had the thought “I can’t handle this,” which makes sense and maybe tipped you over the
edge. (Skill 2: Validation; Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 1)
THERAPIST 74: One thing I was wondering about was ways to decrease the likelihood
of self-harm when you’re feeling so intense and having strong urges. Last week, the
self-harm—was it just burning, or was there cutting too? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment,
Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 75: OK, and always with a lighter? Or with other things too? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
CLIENT 75: Just with the lighter. And like, I don’t need it around. I don’t smoke.
THERAPIST 76: I’m so glad to hear you say that. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior)
I was thinking the same thing! It sounds like those lighters don’t need to be around the
house. When they’re there, it’s like a cue for self-harm thoughts. Can we get rid of them?
(Skill 6: Problem Solving)
CLIENT 76: I mean, I don’t smoke, but we use them for the BBQ .
THERAPIST 77: OK, it sounds like you’re saying you’re not sure if you can get rid of them?
(Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 78: OK, let me take a step back to see if I understand. If we could figure out the
BBQ thing, is getting rid of the lighters or any of the things you use to self-harm some-
thing you would be willing to do? To help buy you time to use skills when your urges are
really high? (Skill 5: Eliciting a Commitment; Skill 6: Problem Solving)
THERAPIST 79: OK, I can work with that. [smiles] One thought is that if you’re not ready to
get rid of them completely, you could put them in a place that’s hard to get to. Where in
your house would lighters be hard to get to? (Skill 6: Problem Solving)
CLIENT 79: I guess the basement. I don’t like to go down there. It’s full of bugs and creeps
me out.
THERAPIST 80: That’s a great idea! (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Could you put
them in a box and move them to the basement? (Skill 6: Problem Solving, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 81: Amazing. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) If you wanted to go a step
further, you could put even more obstacles to getting them. Like locking them in a box in
the basement or wrapping them up in a bag with tape so they’re not so easy to get out.
Could you do that? (Skill 6: Problem Solving, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 82: Yeah? Fantastic. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) What could get in
the way of you actually doing that when you leave here today? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment,
Criterion 2)
CLIENT 82: I don’t know. I can do it with my lighters, but what about the other lighters in
my house? My roommates have them everywhere.
THERAPIST 83: Ah, this is a great question! (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Are your
roommates people you could talk to about what you’re doing and why you’re doing it?
Are they people that could support you around doing it? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment,
Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 84: They don’t know? Do they know that you self-harm? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 85: OK, so it sounds like if you told them you self-harm with lighters maybe it
wouldn’t be such a surprise? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 86: Yeah, I can imagine it wouldn’t be the most comfortable conversation and
it might be worth doing it anyway. (Skill 11: Promoting Dialectical Thinking Through Both–
And Statements) I mean in some ways it ties in really nicely with what we’ve been talking
about today. Acting opposite to shame . . . and maybe showing yourself that you can do
hard things even if it brings up change.
THERAPIST 87: OK, it sounds like you’re committed to getting rid of your lighters but
are a bit less sure about talking to your roommates about getting rid of their lighters.
I can understand that. (Skill 2: Validation) I think it’s really great that you’re willing to
get rid of yours, (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) and perhaps next week we
can focus a bit more on how to get rid of the ones that don’t belong to you or that
your roommates bring into the house. So it sounds like between now and next week
you’ll put your lighters in the basement and will consider talking to your roommates.
Is that correct?
THERAPIST 88: Great! If it would be helpful, you can email me after you’ve done it to let me
know. Do you think that would increase the likelihood of you doing it? (Skill 3: Reinforcing
Adaptive Behavior)
THERAPIST 89: OK, fantastic. I’ll look forward to getting that email. (Skill 3: Reinforcing
Adaptive Behavior) So I think the last thing we should focus on before we wrap up today
162 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
is this thought: “I can’t handle these thoughts.” It sounds like when that thought popped
up last week it left you feeling kind of hopeless and like you had no option but to self-
harm. (Skill 8: Modifying Cognitions) Can you remind me, have you learned distress toler-
ance skills in your group yet?
THERAPIST 90: No? OK, these might be the perfect skills to use when you have the thought
“I can’t handle this.” Because one of the things we’re doing when we use distress toler-
ance skills is saying “my emotions are really intense right now, but feelings pass, they’re
like waves.” So maybe in those moments where you notice the thought “I can’t handle
this,” you can try to validate yourself by acknowledging “this is so hard” or “this is such a
painful feeling, and it’s hard to feel.” I wonder if that would help you feel more motivated
in the moment to try to use a skill. Like grabbing an ice pack or taking a cold shower.
Have you tried doing either of those things when you’re feeling distressed? (Skill 6:
Problem Solving; Skill 7: Skills Training; Skill 10: Coaching Clients in Distress—Criterion 2,
Temperature skill)
THERAPIST 91: That’s amazing! (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Was it helpful?
THERAPIST 92: Uh huh. I see. So it didn’t help interrupt the action. Did it buy you any time
in between the urge and action? (Skill 4: Problem Assessment)
THERAPIST 93: OK. That’s a great start. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) What we
can talk about next time is other skills you can use in that brief period of time that might
tip the balance. How does that sound to you?
THERAPIST 94: It is difficult. It is absolutely difficult. (Skill 2: Validation) The goal here is
not to become an expert overnight. It’s to keep practicing and seeing what works and
then readjusting and adding new things if what you’re doing isn’t working or if it needs
to be tweaked. This is hard stuff, and I know you can do it. (Skill 11: Promoting Dialectical
Thinking Through Both–And Statements) And I’m here to help you do it. So we have a
bunch of stuff that we need to revisit on the agenda next week ’cause I really do want to
understand what’s happening in our sessions that is increasing your urges to use, and to
quit therapy and self-harm. Are you having those high urges right now? (Skill 4: Problem
Assessment, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 95: Yeah? Are you having those high urges right now though?
CLIENT 95: It’s like, I’ve never had a chance to understand how to grow, but it’s scary at
the same time.
THERAPIST 96: Yeah, that makes total sense to me. It’s scary to try to do new things,
especially when you don’t know what to expect or are worried it’s not going to work for
you. (Skill 2: Validation) And I think it’s amazing that you keep coming and trying despite
how scared you feel. Just showing up sometimes takes a lot of effort and courage. (Skill 3:
Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior)
Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice Session Transcript 163
THERAPIST 97: So, there’s a lot on your plate this week. You’re going to get rid of or put
the lighters away and let me know once you’ve done that. Are there any other pieces
from today that you are thinking would be helpful to focus on this coming week? Perhaps
one other thing that we talked about that you think you’d like to focus on? (Skill 6: Problem
Solving, Criterion 2)
THERAPIST 98: I think that’s a great idea. (Skill 3: Reinforcing Adaptive Behavior) Keeping
track of embarrassment and shame and perhaps noticing urges that go along with that
feeling?
THERAPIST 99: Well, I am really looking forward to hearing how that goes and what
you notice. You and I are meeting at our regular time next week, yeah? Here’s a new
diary card.
For the mock session, you will perform a role-play of an initial therapy session. As is
true with the exercises to build individual skills, the role-play involves three people:
One trainee role-plays the therapist, another trainee role-plays the client, and a trainer
(a professor or a supervisor) observes and provides feedback. This is an open-ended
role-play, as is commonly done in training. However, it differs in two important ways
from the role-plays used in more traditional training. First, the therapist will use their
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-016
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
165
166 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
hand to indicate how difficult the role-play feels. Second, the client will attempt to
make the role-play easier or harder to ensure the therapist is practicing at the right
difficulty level.
Preparation
2. Download the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form and the Deliberate Practice Diary
Form from the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab at https://www.apa.org/
pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy (also available in
Appendixes A and B, respectively). Every student will need their own copy of the
Deliberate Practice Reaction Form on a separate piece of paper so they can access it
quickly.
3. Designate one student to role-play the therapist and one student to role-play the
client. The trainer will observe and provide corrective feedback.
1. The trainees will role-play an initial (first) therapy session. The trainee role-playing the
client selects a client profile from the end of this exercise.
2. Before beginning the role-play, the therapist raises their hand to their side, at the level
of their chair seat (see Figure E14.1). They will use this hand throughout the role-play
to indicate how challenging it feels to them to help the client. Their starting hand level
Note. Left: Start of role-play. Right: Role-play is too difficult. Reprinted from Deliberate Practice in Emotion-
Focused Therapy (p. 156), by R. N. Goldman, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere, 2021, American Psychological Asso-
ciation (https://doi.org/10.1037/0000227-000). Copyright 2021 by the American Psychological Association.
Mock Dialectical Behavior Therapy Sessions 167
(chair seat) indicates that the role-play feels easy. By raising their hand, the therapist
indicates that the difficulty is rising. If their hand rises above their neck level, it indi-
cates that the role-play is too difficult.
3. The therapist begins the role-play. The therapist and client should engage in the role-
play in an improvised manner, as they would engage in a real therapy session. The
therapist keeps their hand out at their side throughout this process. (This may feel
strange at first!)
4. Whenever the therapist feels that the difficulty of the role-play has changed signifi-
cantly, they should move their hand up if it feels more difficult and down if it feels
easier. If the therapist’s hand drops below the seat of their chair, the client should make
the role-play more challenging; if the therapist’s hand rises above their neck level, the
client should make the role-play easier. Instructions for adjusting the difficulty of the
role-play are described in the Varying the Level of Challenge section.
Note to Therapists
Remember to be aware of your vocal tone and pacing. Match your tone to the
client’s presentation. Thus, if clients present softer emotions, soften your tone to be
soothing and calm. If, on the other hand, clients are demonstrating more volatility,
match your tone to be firm and solid. If you choose responses that prompt client
exploration, remember to adopt a more querying, exploratory tone of voice.
5. The role-play continues for at least 15 minutes. The trainer may provide corrective
feedback during this process if the therapist gets significantly offtrack. However, trainers
should exercise restraint and keep feedback as short and tight as possible, as this will
increase the therapist’s opportunity for experiential training.
6. After the role-play is finished, the therapist and client switch roles and begin a new
mock session.
7. After both trainees have completed the mock session as a therapist, the trainees and
the trainer discuss the experience.
If the therapist indicates that the mock session is too easy, the person enacting the role
of the client can use the following modifications to make it more challenging (see also
Appendix A):
• The client can improvise with topics that are more evocative or make the therapist
uncomfortable, such as expressing currently held strong feelings (see Figure A.2).
• The client can use a distressed voice (e.g., angry, sad, sarcastic) or unpleasant facial
expression. This increases the emotional tone.
• The client can blend complex mixtures of opposing feelings (e.g., love and rage).
• The client can become confrontational, questioning the purpose of therapy
or the therapist’s fitness for the role.
168 Deliberate Practice Exercises for Dialectical Behavior Therapy Skills
• The client can ask the questions in a soft voice or with a smile. This softens the emo-
tional stimulus.
• The trainer can expand the “feedback phase” by discussing DBT or psychotherapy
theory.
Following are six client profiles for trainees to use during mock sessions, presented in
order of difficulty. The choice of client profile may be determined by the trainee playing
the therapist, the trainee playing the client, or assigned by the trainer.
The most important aspect of role-plays is for trainees to convey the emotional
tone indicated by the client profile (e.g., “angry” or “sad”). The demographics of the
client and specific content of the client profiles are not important. Thus, trainees should
adjust the client profile to be most comfortable and easy for the trainee to role-play.
For example, a trainee may change the gender, age, or cultural background included
in the client profile.
Annie is a 28-year-old Asian woman who recently broke up with her boyfriend. She has
been feeling sadness about the end of her relationship. Her sadness is complicated by
feelings of anger that her boyfriend betrayed her by breaking up with her “out of the
blue.” She described feeling very attached to her boyfriend when they were together
despite a lot of volatility in the relationship (e.g., frequent conflict and arguments). She
feels rejected by her boyfriend and has tried many times to convince him to take her
back, including multiple text messages and phone calls. So far, he has been unrespon-
sive to her attempts to reconcile. Annie wants help coping more effectively with her
sadness and anger.
Firaz is a 25-year-old Middle Eastern man who experiences anxiety, occasional panic
attacks, and high levels of shame. He says he has felt like a “loser” his whole life. He
was bullied in high school and often feels like people are judging him. As a result, he
tries to avoid contact with people except through online computer games. He lives
Mock Dialectical Behavior Therapy Sessions 169
at home with his parents, and they suggested that he come to therapy because they
were concerned he was spending too much time by himself. Firaz says he would like
more social connection but doesn’t think other people would be interested in being
friends with him.
• Client’s goals for therapy: Firaz wants to decrease anxiety and increase social
connections.
• Attitude toward therapy: Firaz has not received any previous treatment. He is
uncertain what to expect from therapy. He feels anxious about attending therapy
but is hopeful it will help.
• Client’s goals for therapy: Dani wants to feel more confident socially so they can
engage in work and social relationships more reliably.
• Attitude toward therapy: Dani initially didn’t want to come to therapy because they
worried their therapist would judge them. A close friend of theirs convinced them to
give therapy a try.
• Strengths: Underneath their shame and anxiety, Dani desires a connection with other
people, including their therapist.
Maria is a 55-year-old Latinx woman who was referred to DBT by her psychiatrist because
previous treatments had been unsuccessful. Maria is very smart and gets frustrated
quickly when people challenge her, patronize her, or when she feels misunderstood.
When she gets frustrated, Maria can get sarcastic or mean. Not infrequently, she can
become so enraged that she has anger outbursts that include name-calling, swearing,
and physical aggression. Maria understands that this is a problem and would like to
be more in control of her anger, but she has been unable to change her behavior. She
also feels resentful that she is the one who needs to change her behavior because she
believes her anger is often triggered by others’ mistreatment of her.
• Attitude toward therapy: Maria has been in therapy before and is skeptical that this
new treatment will help; however, she feels it’s her last hope.
• Strengths: Maria is a smart and sensitive person and wants a better life for herself
with less suffering.
Bea is a 27-year-old Black woman and the oldest of four siblings. Bea and her siblings
were sexually and physically abused by her father when she was a child. Her father
also beat her mother frequently, and this intensified once Bea left home. She does
not generally trust the system because she has not felt her interests have been prior-
itized or protected. She experiences intense anxiety and panic when she leaves the
house and often appears withdrawn and dissociative in her therapy sessions. She uses
alcohol to manage overwhelming emotional states. She feels confused about her feel-
ings toward her mother: She feels angry that her mother did not protect her from her
father, and she feels guilty because she abandoned her mother when she left home.
• Client’s goals for therapy: Bea wants to decrease anxiety and dissociation, process
her traumas, and resolve her anger and guilt toward her mother.
• Attitude toward therapy: Bea saw a counselor while she was in high school but
had a bad experience: When she told her counselor about her father’s abuse, her
counselor told her parents what she had said, and they denied it. Thus, Bea is very
mistrustful of therapists.
• Strengths: Bea is committed to improving her mental health. She attends sessions
regularly and completes homework reliably.
Jane is a 20-year-old White woman who is having problems in her friendships. She cycles
between intense feelings of closeness with her friends and then hating them when they
do something that upsets her or when she feels left out or unimportant, like when they
make plans without her or cancel plans. When Jane feels rejected by her friends, she
feels betrayed and abandoned, gets very angry and depressed, and cuts herself. Jane
has a similar pattern with her family, where she cycles between loving them and desiring
closeness and then feeling betrayed and abandoned when they disappoint her.
• Client’s goals for therapy: Jane wants to find strategies for regulating her emotions
and improving her relationships.
• Attitude toward therapy: Jane was in therapy before, which was helpful until the
therapist disappointed Jane by going on vacation during a time she needed support,
after which Jane felt betrayed and abandoned and quit therapy. Jane is worried that
you (her new therapist) may betray or abandon her just like her previous therapist.
• Strengths: When Jane is emotionally regulated, she is able to reflect on her emotions
and work collaboratively with her therapist.
PA R T
173
CHAPTER
3
How to Get the Most Out
of Deliberate Practice: Additional
Guidance for Trainers and Trainees
Six Key Points for Getting the Most From Deliberate Practice
Following are six key points of advice for trainers and trainees to get the most benefits
from the dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) deliberate practice exercises. The following
advice is gleaned from experiences vetting and practicing the exercises, sometimes in
different languages, with many trainees across many countries, on different occasions.
A key component of deliberate practice is using stimuli that provoke similar reactions to
challenging real-life work settings. For example, pilots train with flight simulators that
present mechanical failures and dangerous weather conditions; surgeons practice with
surgical simulators that present medical complications with only seconds to respond.
Training with challenging stimuli will increase trainees’ capacity to perform therapy effec-
tively under stress—for example, with clients they find challenging. The stimuli used for
DBT deliberate practice exercises are role-plays of challenging client statements in
therapy. It is important that the trainee who is role-playing the client perform the
script with appropriate emotional expression and maintain eye contact with the
https://doi.org/10.1037/0000322-017
Deliberate Practice in Dialectical Behavior Therapy, by T. Boritz, S. McMain, A. Vaz, and T. Rousmaniere
Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychological Association. All rights reserved.
175
176 Strategies for Enhancing the Deliberate Practice Exercises
therapist. For example, if the client statement calls for sad emotion, the trainee should
try to express sadness eye-to-eye with the therapist. We offer the following sugges-
tions regarding emotional expressiveness:
1. The emotional tone of the role-play matters more than the exact words of each script.
Trainees role-playing the client should feel free to improvise and change the words if
it will help them be more emotionally expressive. Trainees do not need to stick 100%
exactly to the script. In fact, to read off the script during the exercise can sound flat
and prohibit eye contact. Rather, trainees in the client role should first read the client
statement silently to themselves then, when ready, say it in an emotional manner while
looking directly at the trainee playing the therapist. This will help the experience feel
more real and engaging for the therapist.
2. Trainees whose first language is not English may particularly benefit from reviewing
and changing the words in the client statement script before each role-play so they
can find words that feel congruent and facilitate emotional expression.
3. Trainees role-playing the client should try to use tonal and nonverbal expressions of
feelings. For example, if a script calls for anger, the trainee can speak with an angry
voice and make fists with their hands; if a script calls for shame or guilt, the trainee
could hunch over and wince; if a script calls for sadness, the trainee could speak in a
soft or deflated voice.
4. If trainees are having persistent difficulties acting believably when following a particular
script in the role of client, it may help to first do a “demo round” by reading directly
from paper and then, immediately after, dropping the paper to make eye contact and
repeating the same client statement from memory. Some trainees reported that this
helped them “become available as a real client” and made the role-play feel less artificial.
Some trainees did three or four “demo rounds” to get fully into their role as a client.
Key Point 2: Customize the Exercises to Fit Your Unique Training Circumstances
Deliberate practice is less about adhering to specific rules than it is about using training
principles. Every trainer has their own individual teaching style and every trainee their own
learning process. Thus, the exercises in this book are designed to be flexibly custom-
ized by trainers across different training contexts within different cultures. Trainees and
trainers are encouraged to continually adjust exercises to optimize their practice. The
most effective training will occur when deliberate practice exercises are customized to
fit the learning needs of each trainee and culture of each training site. In our experience
with many trainers and trainees across many countries, we found that everyone spon-
taneously customized the exercises for their unique training circumstances. No two
trainers followed the exact same procedure. Here are a few examples:
• One supervisor used the exercises with a trainee who found all the client statements
to be too hard, including the “beginner” stimuli. This trainee had multiple reactions
in the “too hard” category on the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form in Appendix A,
including nausea, severe shame, and self-doubt. The trainee disclosed to the super-
visor that she had experienced extremely harsh learning environments earlier in her
life and found the role-plays to be highly evocative. To help, the supervisor followed
the suggestions offered in Appendix A to make the stimuli progressively easier until
the trainee reported feeling a “good challenge” on the Deliberate Practice Reaction
Form. Over many weeks of practice, the trainee developed a sense of safety and was
How to Get the Most Out of Deliberate Practice 177
able to practice with more difficult client statements. (Note that if the supervisor had
proceeded at the too hard difficulty level, the trainee might have complied while
hiding her negative reactions, become emotionally dysregulated and overwhelmed,
leading to shame and subsequent withdrawal, and thus prohibiting her skill develop-
ment and risking dropout from training.)
• Supervisors of trainees for whom English was not their first language adjusted the
client statements to their own primary language.
• One supervisor used the exercises with a trainee who found all the stimuli to be
too easy, including the advanced client statements. This supervisor quickly moved
to improvising more challenging client statements from scratch by following the
instructions in Appendix A on how to make client statements more challenging.
Deliberate practice uses rehearsal to move skills into procedural memory, which helps
trainees maintain access to skills even when working with challenging clients. This only
works if trainees engage in many repetitions of the exercises. Think of a challenging
sport or musical instrument you learned: How many rehearsals would a professional
need to feel confident performing a new skill? Psychotherapy is no easier than those
other fields!
Key Point 6: Putting It All Together With the Practice Transcript and Mock
Therapy Sessions
Some trainees may feel a further need for greater contextualization of the individual
therapy responses associated with each skill, feeling the need to integrate the disparate
178 Strategies for Enhancing the Deliberate Practice Exercises
pieces of their training in a more coherent manner, with a simulation that mimics a real
therapy session. The annotated transcript in Exercise 13 and the mock therapy sessions in
Exercise 14 give trainees this opportunity, allowing them to practice delivering different
responses sequentially in a more realistic therapeutic encounter.
Responsive Treatment
The exercises in this book are designed not only to help trainees acquire specific skills
of DBT but to use them in ways that are responsive to each individual client and their
context and are driven by a solid case formulation (Boritz et al., 2021, 2023; McMain
et al., 2019). Across the psychotherapy literature, this stance has been referred to as
appropriate responsiveness, wherein the therapists exercise flexible judgment, based
in their perception of the client’s emotional state, needs, and goals, and integrates tech-
niques and other interpersonal skills in pursuit of optimal client outcomes (Hatcher, 2015;
Stiles et al., 1998). The effective therapist is responsive to the emerging context. As Stiles
and Horvath (2017) argued, a therapist is effective because they are appropriately respon-
sive. Doing the “right thing” may be different each time and means providing each client
with an individually tailored response.
Appropriate responsiveness counters a misconception that deliberate practice
rehearsal is designed to promote robotic repetition of therapy techniques. Psychotherapy
researchers have shown that overadherence to a particular model while neglecting client
preferences reduces therapy effectiveness (e.g., Castonguay et al., 1996; Henry et al.,
1993; Owen & Hilsenroth, 2014). Therapist flexibility, on the other hand, has been shown
to improve outcomes (e.g., Bugatti & Boswell, 2016; Kendall & Beidas, 2007; Kendall &
Frank, 2018). It is important, therefore, that trainees practice their newly learned skills in
a manner that is flexible and responsive to the unique needs of a diverse range of clients
(Hatcher, 2015; Hill & Knox, 2013). It is thus of paramount importance for trainees to
develop the necessary perceptual skills to be able to attune to what the client is
experiencing in the moment and form their response based on the client moment
by moment context.
The supervisor must help the supervisee to specifically attune themselves to the
unique and specific needs of the clients during sessions. By enacting responsiveness
with the supervisee, the supervisor can demonstrate its value and make it more explicit.
In these ways, attention can be given to the larger picture of appropriate responsive-
ness. Here the trainee and supervisor can work together to help the trainee master not
just the techniques, but how therapists can use their judgment to put the techniques
together to foster positive change. Helping trainees keep this overarching goal in mind
while reviewing therapy sessions is a valuable feature of supervision that is difficult to
obtain otherwise (Hatcher, 2015).
It is also important that deliberate practice occurs within a context of broader DBT
training. The DBT supervision model takes into account the inherently challenging
nature of the therapeutic work with the client populations DBT is typically applied to
(Waltz et al., 1998). As noted in Chapter 1, training should be combined with theoretical
learning and observation of competent DBT psychotherapists, as well as personal thera-
peutic work with clients. Trainees learning DBT generally receive individual supervision
that includes some form of observation (e.g., audio, videotape, or live supervision).
In addition, the DBT model encourages therapists at all stages of learning to participate on
a consultation team, as doing the therapy effectively with complex client populations is
How to Get the Most Out of Deliberate Practice 179
near to impossible without the support and guidance of a consultation team. When the
trainer or trainee determines that the trainee is having difficulty acquiring DBT skills, it
is important to carefully assess what is missing or needed. Assessment can then lead
to the appropriate solution, as the trainer and trainee collaboratively determine what
is needed to solve the identified problem (similar to how we might approach solution
analysis with a DBT client).
Although negative effects that some clients experience in psychotherapy have been
well documented (Barlow, 2010), negative effects of training and supervision on trainees
has received less attention (Ellis et al., 2014). DBT supervision, like the treatment itself,
aims to create an accepting and safe context that encourages and supports the trainee
in delivering the most effective treatment possible (Fruzzetti et al., 1997). A general
approach to DBT supervision is to try to achieve and maintain the fundamental dialec-
tical balance between acceptance and change. The supervisor does this by working to
understand and validate the supervisee’s experience. At the same time, the supervisor
may function as a coach, giving directions, providing feedback on performance, and
encouraging the therapist to persist at trying difficult things (Waltz et al., 1998).
To support strong self-efficacy, trainers must ensure that trainees are practicing at
a correct difficulty level. The exercises in this book feature guidance for frequently
assessing and adjusting the difficulty level, so trainees can rehearse at a level that
precisely targets their personal skill threshold. Trainers and supervisors must be mindful
to provide an appropriate challenge. One risk to trainees that is particularly pertinent
to this book occurs when using role-plays that are too difficult. The Deliberate Prac-
tice Reaction Form in Appendix A is provided to help trainers ensure that role-plays
are done at an appropriate challenge level. Trainers or trainees may be tempted to
skip the difficulty assessments and adjustments, out of their motivation to focus on
rehearsal to make fast progress and quickly acquire skills. But across all our test sites,
we found that skipping the difficulty assessments and adjustments caused more prob-
lems and hindered skill acquisition more than any other error. Thus, trainers are advised
to remember that one of their most important responsibilities is to remind trainees to
do the difficulty assessments and adjustments.
Additionally, the Reaction Form serves a dual purpose of helping trainees develop
the important skills of self-monitoring and self-awareness (Bennett-Levy & Finlay-Jones,
2018). This will help trainees adopt a positive and empowered stance regarding their
own self-care and should facilitate career-long professional development.
The deliberate practice exercises in this book may stir up complex or uncomfortable
personal reactions within trainees, including, for example, memories of past traumas.
Exploring psychological and emotional reactions may make some trainees feel vulner-
able. Therapists of every career stage, from trainees to seasoned therapists with decades
of experience, commonly experience shame, embarrassment, and self-doubt in this
process. Although these experiences can be valuable for building trainees’ self-awareness,
it is important that training remain focused on professional skill development and not blur
180 Strategies for Enhancing the Deliberate Practice Exercises
into personal therapy (e.g., Ellis et al., 2014). Therefore, one trainer role is to remind
trainees to maintain appropriate boundaries.
Trainees must have the final say about what to disclose or not disclose to their
trainer. Trainees should keep in mind that the goal is for the trainee to expand their
own self-awareness and psychological capacity to stay active and helpful while experi-
encing uncomfortable reactions. The trainer does not need to know the specific details
about the trainee’s inner world for this to happen.
Trainees should be instructed to share only personal information that they feel comfort-
able sharing. The Reaction Form and difficulty assessment process are designed to help
trainees build their self-awareness while retaining control over their privacy. Trainees can
be reminded that the goal is for them to learn about their own inner world. They do not
necessarily have to share that information with trainers or peers (Bennett-Levy & Finlay-
Jones, 2018). Likewise, trainees should be instructed to respect the confidentiality of
their peers.
Trainer Self-Evaluation
The exercises in this book were tested at a wide range of training sites around the world,
including graduate courses, practicum sites, and private practice offices. Although
trainers reported that the exercises were highly effective for training, some also said
that they felt disoriented by how different deliberate practice feels compared with their
traditional methods of clinical education. Many felt comfortable evaluating their trainees’
performance but were less sure about their own performance as trainers.
The most common concern we heard from trainers was, “My trainees are doing
great, but I’m not sure if I am doing this correctly!” To address this concern, we recom-
mend trainers perform periodic self-evaluations using the following five criteria:
Determining how well we are doing as trainers means first having valid information
about how well trainees are responding to training. This requires that we directly observe
trainees practicing skills to provide corrective feedback and evaluation. One risk of
deliberate practice is that trainees gain competence in performing therapy skills in role-
plays but those skills do not transfer to trainees’ work with real clients. Thus, trainers
will ideally also have the opportunity to observe samples of trainees’ work with real
clients, either live or via recorded video. Supervisors and consultants rely heavily—
and, too often, exclusively—on supervisees’ and consultees’ narrative accounts of their
work with clients (Goodyear & Nelson, 1997). Haggerty and Hilsenroth (2011) described
this challenge:
Suppose a loved one has to undergo surgery and you need to choose between
two surgeons, one of whom has never been directly observed by an experi-
enced surgeon while performing any surgery. He or she would perform the
How to Get the Most Out of Deliberate Practice 181
surgery and return to his or her attending physician and try to recall, some-
times incompletely or inaccurately, the intricate steps of the surgery they just
performed. It is hard to imagine that anyone, given a choice, would prefer this
over a professional who has been routinely observed in the practice of their
craft. (p. 193)
Trainees need corrective feedback to learn what they are doing well, what they are
doing poorly, and how to improve their skills. Feedback should be as specific and incre-
mental as possible. Examples of specific feedback are, “Your voice sounds rushed. Try
slowing down by pausing for a few seconds between your statements to the client,”
and, “That’s excellent how you are making eye contact with the client.” Examples of
vague and nonspecific feedback are, “Try to build better rapport with the client,” and,
“Try to be more open to the client’s feelings.”
Criterion 3: Specific Skill Rehearsal Just Beyond the Trainees’ Current Ability
(Zone of Proximal Development)
Deliberate practice emphasizes skill acquisition via behavioral rehearsal. Trainers should
endeavor not to get caught up in client conceptualization at the expense of focusing on
skills. For many trainers, this requires significant discipline and self-restraint. It is simply
more enjoyable to talk about psychotherapy theory (e.g., case conceptualization,
treatment planning, nuances of psychotherapy models, similar cases the supervisor has
had) than watch trainees rehearse skills. Trainees have many questions and supervisors
have an abundance of experience; the allotted supervision time can easily be filled by
sharing knowledge. The supervisor gets to sound smart, while the trainee doesn’t have
to struggle with acquiring skills at their learning edge. While answering questions is
important, trainees’ intellectual knowledge about psychotherapy can quickly surpass
their procedural ability to perform psychotherapy, particularly with clients they find
challenging. Here’s a simple rule of thumb: The trainer provides the knowledge, but the
behavioral rehearsal provides the skill (Rousmaniere, 2019).
Deliberate practice involves optimal strain: practicing skills just beyond the trainee’s current
skill threshold so they can learn incrementally without becoming overwhelmed (Ericsson,
2006). Trainers should use difficulty assessments and adjustments throughout deliberate
practice to ensure that trainees are practicing at the right difficulty level. Note that some
trainees are surprised by their unpleasant reactions to exercises (e.g., disassociation,
nausea, blanking out) and may be tempted to “push through” exercises that are too hard.
This can happen out of fear of failing a course, fear of being judged as incompetent, or
negative self-impressions by the trainee (e.g., “This shouldn’t be so hard”). Trainers should
normalize the fact that there will be wide variation in perceived difficulty of the exercises
and encourage trainees to respect their own personal training process.
translate into work with real clients. Thus, it is important that trainers assess the impact
of deliberate practice on trainees’ work with real clients. Ideally, this is done through
triangulation of multiple data points:
If the trainee’s effectiveness with real clients is not improving after deliberate practice,
the trainer should do a careful assessment of the difficulty. If the supervisor or trainer feels
it is a skill acquisition issues, they may want to consider adjusting the deliberate practice
routine to better suit the trainee’s learning needs and/or style.
Therapists have traditionally been evaluated from a lens of process accountability
(Markman & Tetlock, 2000; see also Goodyear, 2015), which focuses on demonstrating
specific behaviors (e.g., fidelity to a treatment model) without regard to the impact on
clients. We propose that clinical effectiveness is better assessed through a lens tightly
focused on client outcomes and that learning objectives shift from performing behaviors
that experts have decided are effective (i.e., the competence model) to highly individ-
ualized behavioral goals tailored to each trainee’s zone of proximal development and
performance feedback. This model of assessment has been termed outcome account-
ability (Goodyear, 2015), which focuses on client changes, rather than therapist compe-
tence, independent of how the therapist might be performing expected tasks.
The central theme of this book has been that skill rehearsal is not automatically helpful.
Deliberate practice must be done well for trainees to benefit (Ericsson & Pool, 2016). In
this chapter and in the exercises, we offer guidance for effective deliberate practice.
We would also like to provide additional advice specifically for trainees. That advice is
drawn from what we have learned at our volunteer deliberate practice test sites around
the world. We cover how to discover your own training process, active effort, playful-
ness and taking breaks during deliberate practice, your right to control your self-disclosure
to trainers, monitoring training results, monitoring complex reactions toward the trainer,
and your own personal therapy.
Deliberate practice works best when training targets each trainee’s personal skill thresh-
olds. Also termed the zone of proximal development, a term first coined by Vygotsky
in reference to developmental learning theory (Zaretskii, 2009), this is the area just
beyond the trainee’s current ability, but which is possible to reach with the assistance
of a teacher or coach (Wass & Golding, 2014). If a deliberate practice exercise is
either too easy or too hard, the trainee will not benefit. To maximize training produc-
tivity, elite performers follow a “challenging but not overwhelming” principle: Tasks
that are too far beyond their capacity will prove ineffective and even harmful; it is
equally true that mindlessly repeating what they already can do confidently will prove
equally fruitless. Because of this, deliberate practice requires ongoing assessment of
the trainee’s current skill and concurrent difficulty adjustment to consistently target a
“good enough” challenge. Thus, if you are practicing Exercise 11, “Promoting Dialectical
Thinking Through Both–And Statements” and it just feels too difficult, consider moving
How to Get the Most Out of Deliberate Practice 183
Active Effort
It is important for trainees to maintain an active and sustained effort while doing the
deliberate practice exercises in this book. Deliberate practice helps when trainees push
themselves up to and past their current ability. This is best achieved when trainees take
ownership of their own practice by guiding their training partners to adjust role-plays
to be as high on the difficulty scale as possible without hurting themselves. This will
look different for every trainee. Although it can feel uncomfortable or even frightening,
this is the zone of proximal development where the most gains can be made. Simply
reading and repeating the written scripts will provide little or no benefit. Trainees are
advised to remember that their effort from training should lead to more confidence and
comfort in session with real clients.
Deliberate practice only works if trainees push themselves hard enough to break out
of their old patterns of performance, which then permits growth of new skills (Ericsson
& Pool, 2016). Because deliberate practice constantly focuses on the current edge of
one’s performance capacity, it is inevitably a straining endeavor. Indeed, professionals are
unlikely to make lasting performance improvements unless there is sufficient engage-
ment in tasks that are just at the edge of one’s current capacity (Ericsson, 2003, 2006).
From athletics or fitness training, many of us are familiar with this process of being
pushed out of our comfort zones, followed by adaptation. The same process applies to
our mental and emotional abilities.
Many trainees might feel surprised to discover that deliberate practice for DBT feels
harder than psychotherapy with a real client. This may be because when working with
a real client, a therapist can get into a state of flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1997), where work
feels effortless. It is not uncommon for beginner DBT trainees to feel more comfortable
with either validation strategies or change strategies: It is difficult at the beginning to
focus continually on balancing acceptance and change. At times, DBT trainees may
feel overwhelmed by the task of weaving these strategies seamlessly, and this can
lead to feelings of ineffectiveness. In such cases, DBT trainees can consider returning
temporarily to offering response formats with which they are more familiar and feel
more proficient (e.g., focusing simply on providing validating), to increase a sense of
confidence and mastery before trying once again to practice more complex skills.
The effectiveness of deliberate practice is directly related to the effort and ownership
trainees exert while doing the exercises. Trainers can provide guidance, but it is important
for trainees to learn about their own idiosyncratic training processes over time. This will
let them become masters of their own training and prepare for a career-long process
of professional development. The following are a few examples of personal training
processes trainees discovered while engaging in deliberate practice:
• One trainee noticed that she is good at persisting while an exercise is challenging but
also that she requires more rehearsal than other trainees to feel comfortable with a
new skill. This trainee focused on developing patience with her own pace of progress.
184 Strategies for Enhancing the Deliberate Practice Exercises
• One trainee noticed that he could acquire new skills rather quickly, with only a
few repetitions. However, he also noticed that his reactions to evocative client
statements could jump very quickly and unpredictably from the “good challenge” to
“too hard” categories, so he needed to carefully attend to the reactions listed in the
Deliberate Practice Reaction Form.
• One trainee described herself as “perfectionistic” and felt a strong urge to “push
through” an exercise even when she had anxiety reactions in the “too hard” category,
such as nausea and disassociation. This caused the trainee not to benefit from
the exercises and risk getting demoralized. This trainee focused on going slower,
developing self-compassion regarding her anxiety reactions, and asking her training
partners to make role-plays less challenging.
Trainees are encouraged to reflect deeply on their own experiences using the exer-
cises to learn the most about themselves and their personal learning processes.
Psychotherapy is serious work that often involves painful feelings. However, practicing
psychotherapy can be playful and fun (Scott Miller, personal communication, 2017).
Trainees should remember that one of the main goals of deliberate practice is to exper-
iment with different approaches and styles of therapy. If deliberate practice ever feels
rote, boring, or routine, it probably isn’t going to help advance trainees’ skill. In this
case, trainees should try to liven it up. A good way to do this is to introduce an atmo-
sphere of playfulness. For example, trainees can do the following:
• Use different vocal tones, speech pacing, body gestures, or other languages. This
can expand trainees’ communication range.
• Practice while standing up or walking around outside. This can help trainees get new
perspectives on the process of therapy.
The supervisor can also ask trainees if they would like to take a 5- to 10-minute break
between questions, particularly if the trainees are dealing with difficult emotions and
are feeling overwhelmed or stressed out.
This book focuses on deliberate practice methods that involve active, live engage-
ment between trainees and a supervisor. Importantly, deliberate practice can extend
beyond these focused training sessions and be used for homework. For example,
a trainee might read the client stimuli quietly or aloud and practice their responses
independently between sessions with a supervisor. In such cases, it is important for the
trainee to say their therapist responses aloud, rather than rehearse silently in one’s head.
Alternatively, two trainees can practice as a pair, without the supervisor. Although the
absence of a supervisor limits one source of feedback, the peer trainee who is playing
the client can perform this role, as they can when a supervisor is present. Importantly,
these additional deliberate practice opportunities are intended to take place between
focused training sessions with a supervisor. To optimize the quality of the deliberate
practice when conducted independently or without a supervisor, we have developed
a Deliberate Practice Diary Form that can be found in Appendix B or downloaded from
https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy
(see the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab). This form provides a template for
the trainee to record their experience of the deliberate practice activity, and, ideally,
How to Get the Most Out of Deliberate Practice 185
it will aid in the consolidation of learning. This form can be used as part of the evalua-
tion process with the supervisor, but it is not necessarily intended for that purpose, and
trainees are certainly welcome to bring their experience with the independent practice
into the next meeting with the supervisor.
While trainers will evaluate trainees using a competency-focused model, trainees are
also encouraged to take ownership of their own training process and look for results
of deliberate practice themselves. Trainees should experience the results of deliberate
practice within a few training sessions. A lack of results can be demoralizing for trainees
and can result in trainees applying less effort and focus in deliberate practice. Trainees
who are not seeing results should openly discuss this problem with their trainer and
experiment with adjusting their deliberate practice process. Results can include client
outcomes and improving the trainee’s own work as a therapist, their personal develop-
ment, and their overall training.
Client Outcomes
One important result of deliberate practice is change within the trainee regarding their
work with clients. For example, trainees at test sites reported feeling more comfort-
able sitting with evocative clients, more confident addressing uncomfortable topics in
therapy, and more responsive to a broader range of clients.
Another important result of deliberate practice is personal growth within the trainee.
For example, trainees at test sites reported becoming more in touch with their own
feelings, increased self-compassion, and enhanced motivation to work with a broader
range of clients.
should grow to feel more ownership of their training process. Training to be a psycho-
therapist is a complex process that occurs over many years. Experienced, expert ther-
apists still report continuing to grow well beyond their graduate school years (Orlinsky
et al., 2005). Furthermore, training is not a linear process. It is not uncommon for psycho-
therapists to feel they have mastered a set of skills with one client, only to be confronted
with new challenges and the need for further skill development with different clients or
in different clinical situations.
Trainees who engage in hard deliberate practice often report experiencing complex
feelings towards their trainer. For example, one trainee said, “I know this is helping,
but I also don’t look forward to it!” Another trainee reported feeling both appreciation
and frustration simultaneously toward her trainer. Trainees are advised to remember
intensive training they have done in other fields, such as athletics or music. When a
coach pushes a trainee to the edge of their ability, it is common for trainees to have
complex reactions toward them.
This does not necessarily mean that the trainer is doing anything wrong. In fact,
intensive training inevitably stirs up reactions toward the trainer, such as frustration,
annoyance, disappointment, or anger, that coexist with the appreciation they feel. In
fact, if trainees do not experience complex reactions, it is worth considering whether
the deliberate practice is sufficiently challenging. But what we asserted earlier about
rights to privacy apply here as well. Because professional mental health training is hier-
archical and evaluative, trainers should not require or even expect trainees to share
complex reactions they may be experiencing toward them. Trainers should stay open
to their sharing, but the choice always remains with the trainee.
When engaging in deliberate practice, many trainees discover aspects of their inner
world that may benefit from attending their own psychotherapy. For example, one
trainee discovered that her clients’ anger stirred up her own painful memories of abuse,
another trainee found himself dissociating while practicing information exposure to
emotions, and another trainee experienced overwhelming shame and self-judgment
when she couldn’t master skills after just a few repetitions.
Although these discoveries were unnerving at first, they were ultimately beneficial
because they motivated the trainees to seek out their own therapy. Many therapists
attend their own therapy. In fact, Norcross and Guy (2005) found in their review of
17 studies that about 75% of the more than 8,000 therapist participants have attended
their own therapy. Orlinsky et al. (2005) found that more than 90% of therapists who
attended their own therapy reported it as helpful.
Difficulty Assessments
and Adjustments A
Deliberate practice works best if the exercises are performed at a good challenge that is
neither too hard nor too easy. To ensure that they are practicing at the correct difficulty,
trainees should do a difficulty assessment and adjustment after each level of client state-
ment is completed (beginner, intermediate, and advanced). To do this, use the following
instructions and the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form (Figure A.1), which is also avail-
able in the “Clinician and Practitioner Resources” tab at https://www.apa.org/pubs/
books/deliberate-practice-dialectical-behavior-therapy. Do not skip this process!
The therapist completes the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form (Figure A.1). If they
• rate the difficulty of the exercise above an 8 or had any of the reactions in the “Too
Hard” column, follow the instructions to make the exercise easier;
• rate the difficulty of the exercise below a 4 or didn’t have any of the reactions in the
“Good Challenge” column, proceed to the next level of harder client statements or
follow the instructions to make exercise harder; or
• rate the difficulty of the exercise between 4 and 8 and have at least one reaction in
the “Good Challenge” column, do not proceed to the harder client statements but
rather repeat the same level.
If the therapist ever rates the difficulty of the exercise above an 8 or has any of the
reactions in the “Too Hard” column, use the next level easier client statements (e.g., if
you were using advanced client statements, switch to intermediate). But if you already
were using beginner client statements, use the following methods to make the client
statements even easier:
• The person playing the client can use the same beginner client statements but this
time in a softer, calmer voice and with a smile. This softens the emotional tone.
189
190 Appendix A
Question 1: How challenging was it to fulfill the skill criteria for this exercise?
Question 2: Did you have any reactions in “good challenge” or “too hard” categories? (yes/no)
Good Challenge Too Hard
Emotions and Thoughts Body Reactions Urges Emotions and Thoughts Body Reactions Urges
• The client can improvise with topics that are less evocative or make the therapist
more comfortable, such as talking about topics without expressing feelings,
the future/past (avoiding the here and now), or any topic outside therapy (see
Figure A.2).
• The therapist can take a short break (5–10 minutes) between questions.
• The trainer can expand the “feedback phase” by discussing dialectical behavior
therapy or psychotherapy theory and research. This should shift the trainees’ focus
toward more detached or intellectual topics and reduce the emotional intensity.
If the therapist rates the difficulty of the exercise below a 4 or didn’t have any of the
reactions in the “Good Challenge” column, proceed to next level harder client state-
ments. If you were already using the advanced client statements, the client should
make the exercise even harder, using the following guidelines:
Appendix A 191
Talking about
events in the
future/past, or
LEAST outside therapy
EVOCATIVE
(EASIER)
MOST
Talking about
EVOCATIVE
here and now,
(HARDER)
therapy, or
therapist
• The person playing the client can use the advanced client statements again with a
more distressed voice (e.g., very angry, sad, sarcastic) or unpleasant facial expres-
sion. This should increase the emotional tone.
• The client can improvise new client statements with topics that are more evocative
or make the therapist uncomfortable, such as expressing strong feelings or talking
about the here and now, therapy, or the therapist (see Figure A.2).
Note. The purpose of a deliberate practice session is not to get through all the
client statements and therapist responses but rather to spend as much time as
possible practicing at the correct difficulty level. This may mean that trainees
repeat the same statements or responses many times, which is OK, as long
as the difficulty remains at the “good challenge” level.
APPENDIX
193
194 Appendix B
Use this form to consolidate learnings from the deliberate practice exercises. Please
protect your personal boundaries by only sharing information that you are comfortable
disclosing.
Name: Date:
Exercise:
Question 1. What was helpful or worked well this deliberate practice session? In what way?
Question 2. What was unhelpful or didn’t go well this deliberate practice session? In
what way?
Question 3. What did you learn about yourself, your current skills, and skills you’d like
to keep improving? Feel free to share any details, but only those you are comfortable
disclosing.
APPENDIX
C
Sample Dialectical Behavior
Therapy Syllabus With Embedded
Deliberate Practice Exercises
Course Title: Dialectical Behavior Therapy: Theory, Case Formulation, and Deliberate
Practice
Course Description
This course teaches theory, principles, and core clinical skills of DBT. As a course with
both didactic and practicum elements, it will review the theory and research on DBT,
frameworks used to formulate and understand client problems, and the use of delib-
erate practice to enable students to acquire 12 key DBT skills.
Course Objectives
Format of Class
Classes are 3 hours long. Course time is split evenly between learning DBT theory (lecture/
discussion) and acquiring DBT skills (DBT skills lab):
Lecture/Discussion Class: Each week, there will be one lecture/discussion class for
1.5 hours focusing on DBT theory and related research.
197
198 Appendix C
DBT Skills Lab: Each week there will be one DBT skills lab for 1.5 hours. Skills labs
are for practicing DBT skills using the exercises in this book. The exercises use therapy
simulations (role-plays) with the following goals:
1. Build trainees’ skill and confidence for using DBT skills with real clients
2. Provide a safe space for experimenting with different therapeutic interventions,
without fear of making mistakes
3. Provide plenty of opportunity to explore and “try on” different styles of therapy, so
trainees can ultimately discover their own personal, unique therapy style
Mock Sessions: Twice in the semester (Weeks 7 and 15), trainees will do a psycho-
therapy mock session in the DBT skills lab. In contrast to highly structured and repetitive
deliberate practice exercises, a psychotherapy mock session is an unstructured and
improvised role-played therapy session. Mock sessions allow trainees to
Homework
Homework will be assigned each week and will include reading, 1 hour of skills practice
with an assigned practice partner, and occasional writing assignments. For the skills
practice homework, trainees will repeat the exercise they did for that week’s DBT skills
lab. Because the instructor will not be there to evaluate performance, trainees should
instead complete the Deliberate Practice Reaction Form, as well as the Deliberate Practice
Diary Form, for themselves as a self-evaluation.
Writing Assignments
Students are to write two papers: one due at midterm and one due on the last day of
class. The first paper will explore one aspect of DBT theory or the empirical literature
on DBT. The second paper will involve the completion of a DBT case formulation and
treatment plan.
Multicultural Orientation
Throughout this course, students are encouraged to reflect on their own cultural identity
and improve their ability to attune with their clients’ cultural identities. In this course,
students will be expected to practice within a multicultural orientation that considers
cultural safety and cultural humility. For further guidance on this topic and deliberate
practice exercises to improve multicultural skills, see the forthcoming book Deliberate
Practice in Multicultural Therapy (Harris et al., 2022).
This course is aimed at developing DBT skills (including self-awareness and interpersonal
skills) in an experiential framework relevant to clinical work. This course is not psycho-
therapy or a substitute for psychotherapy: When engaging in role-playing or experiential
exercises, students should consider the level of self-disclosure that is appropriate to
the context, personally comfortable, and effective for their own learning and that of their
classmates. Students are not evaluated on the level of personal material they choose to
reveal in the class.
200 Appendix C
• Students choose how much, when, and what to disclose. Students are not penalized
for the choice not to share personal information.
• The learning environment is susceptible to group dynamics much like any other
group space, and therefore students may be asked to share their observations and
experiences of the class environment with the singular goal of fostering a more
inclusive and productive learning environment.
Confidentiality
To create a safe learning environment that is respectful of client and therapist informa-
tion and diversity and to foster open and vulnerable conversation in class, students are
required to agree to strict confidentiality within and outside of the instruction setting.
Evaluation
Self-Evaluation: At the end of the semester (Week 15), trainees will perform a self-
evaluation. This will help trainees track their progress and identify areas for further
development. The Guidance for Trainees section in Chapter 3 of Deliberate Practice
in Dialectical Behavior Therapy highlights potential areas of focus for self-evaluation.
Grading Criteria
• the lecture/discussion,
• the skills lab (exercises and mock sessions),
• midterm and final papers, and
• a final exam.
Required Readings
Boritz, T., Varma, S., Sonley, A., & McMain, S. F. (2023). Alliance rupture and repair in dialec-
tical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder. In C. F. Eubanks, L. W. Samstag,
& J. C. Muran (Eds.), Rupture and repair in psychotherapy: A critical process for change
(pp. 141–164). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000306-007
Chapman, A. (2018). Behavioural foundations of DBT: Applying behavioural principles to the
challenge of suicidal behaviour and non-suicidal self-injury. In M. Swales (Ed.), The Oxford
handbook of dialectical behavior therapy (pp. 69–90). Oxford University Press.
Chapman, A. (2019). Phone coaching in dialectical behavior therapy. Guilford Press.
Chapman, A., & Wilks, C. (in press). Applications of dialectical behavior therapy. In G. Gabbard
(Ed.), Textbook of psychotherapeutic treatments (2nd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Heard, H. L., & Swales, M. A. (2016). Changing behavior in DBT: Problem solving in action.
Guilford Press.
Koerner, K., & Linehan, M. M. (2003). Validation principles and strategies. In W. O’Donohue,
J. E. Fisher, & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 229–237). John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.
Appendix C 201
Landes, S. (2018). Conducting effective behavioural and solution analyses. In M. Swales (Ed.),
The Oxford handbook of dialectical behavior therapy (pp. 259–282). Oxford University Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1997). Validation and psychotherapy. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.),
Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 353–392). American Psycho-
logical Association.
Linehan, M. M. (2016). Linehan Risk Assessment and Management Protocol (LRAMP). https://
depts.washington.edu/uwbrtc/wp-content/uploads/LSSN-LRAMP-v1.0.pdf
Linehan, M. M., & Schmidt, H. III. (1995). The dialectics of effective treatment of borderline
personality disorder. In W. O’Donohue & L. Krasner (Eds.), Theories of behavior therapy:
Exploring behavior change (pp. 553–584). American Psychological Association. https://
doi.org/10.1037/10169-020
McMain, S., Korman, L. M., & Dimeff, L. (2001). Dialectical behavior therapy and the treatment
of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/
10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2%3C183::AID-JCLP5%3E3.0.CO;2-Y
McMain, S., Leybman, M., Boritz, T. (2019). Case formulation in dialectical behaviour therapy.
In U. Kramer (Ed.). Case formulation for personality disorders (pp. 1–18). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813521-1.00001-1
Mehlum, L. (2018). DBT as a suicide and self-harm treatment: Assessing and treating suicidal
behaviours. In M. Swales (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of dialectical behavior therapy
(pp. 307–324). Oxford University Press.
Pederson, L. (2015). Dialectical behavior therapy: A contemporary guide for practitioners.
Wiley-Blackwell.
Rizvi, S. L. (2011). The therapeutic relationship in dialectical behavior therapy for suicidal
individuals. In K. Michel & D. A. Jobes (Eds.), Building a therapeutic alliance with the
suicidal patient (pp. 255–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/
10.1037/12303-014
Sonley, A., Boritz, T., & McMain, S. (in press). Applications of dialectical behavior therapy. In
G. Gabbard (Ed.), Textbook of psychotherapeutic treatments (2nd ed.). American Psychi-
atric Publishing.
Swales, M., & Dunkley, C. (2020). Principles of skills assessment in dialectical behavior therapy.
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 27(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.05.001
Swenson, C. (in press). Applications of dialectical behavior therapy. In G. Gabbard (Ed.),
Textbook of psychotherapeutic treatments (2nd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Supplemental Readings
Dimeff, L., & Koerner, K. (2007). Dialectical behavior therapy in clinical practice: Applica-
tions across disorders and settings. Guilford Press.
Koerner, K. (2012). Doing dialectical behavior therapy: A practical guide. Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder.
Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT skills training handouts and worksheets (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT skills training manual (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M., & Wilks, C. R. (2015). The course and evolution of dialectical behavior
therapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 69(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.
psychotherapy.2015.69.2.97
Pryor, K. (1999). Don’t shoot the dog: The new art of teaching and training. Bantam Doubleday
Dell Publishing.
Ramnero, J., & Törneke, N. (2008). The ABCs of human behavior: Behavioral principles for the
practicing clinician. New Harbinger Publications.
Swales, M. (2018). The Oxford handbook of dialectical behavior therapy. Oxford University
Press.
Swenson, C. R. (2016). DBT principles in action: Acceptance, change, and dialectics. Guilford
Press.
References
203
204 References
Castonguay, L. G., Goldfried, M. R., Wiser, S., Raue, P. J., & Hayes, A. M. (1996). Predicting the
effect of cognitive therapy for depression: A study of unique and common factors. Journal
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
006X.64.3.497
Chapman, A. (2018). Behavioural foundations of DBT: Applying behavioural principles to the
challenge of suicidal behaviour and non-suicidal self-injury. In M. Swales (Ed.), The Oxford
handbook of dialectical behavior therapy (pp. 69–90). Oxford University Press.
Chapman, A. (2019). Phone coaching in dialectical behavior therapy. Guilford Press.
Chapman, A., & Wilks, C. (in press). Applications of dialectical behavior therapy. In G. Gabbard
(Ed.), Textbook of psychotherapeutic treatments (2nd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Coker, J. (1990). How to practice jazz. Jamey Aebersold.
Cook, R. (2005). It’s about that time: Miles Davis on and off record. Atlantic Books.
Cristea, I. A., Gentili, C., Cotet, C. D., Palomba, D., Barbui, C., & Cuijpers, P. (2017). Efficacy of
psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
JAMA Psychiatry, 74(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.4287
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life.
Harper Collins.
Dimeff, L. A., Rizvi, S. L., & Koerner, K. (2021). Dialectical behavior therapy in clinical practice:
Applications across disorders and settings. Guilford Press.
Ellis, M. V., Berger, L., Hanus, A. E., Ayala, E. E., Swords, B. A., & Siembor, M. (2014). Inadequate
and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence.
The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
Ericsson, K. A. (2003). Development of elite performance and deliberate practice: An update
from the perspective of the expert performance approach. In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson
(Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 49–81).
Human Kinetics.
Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert
performance in medicine and related domains: Invited address. Academic Medicine,
79(10, Suppl.), S70–S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the devel-
opment of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, &
R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance
(pp. 683–703). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038
Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge
handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the
acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/
10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Houghton
Mifflin Harcourt.
Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Interaction between encoding and retrieval operations
in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3(6),
701–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.3.6.701
Fruzzetti, A. E., Waltz, J. A., & Linehan, M. M. (1997). Supervision in dialectical behavior therapy.
In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 84–100). Wiley.
Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. Little, Brown & Company.
Goldberg, S., Rousmaniere, T. G., Miller, S. D., Whipple, J., Nielsen, S. L., Hoyt, W., & Wampold,
B. E. (2016). Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis
of outcomes in a clinical setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 1–11. https://
doi.org/10.1037/cou0000131
Goldman, R. N., Vaz, A., & Rousmaniere, T. (2021). Deliberate practice in emotion-focused
therapy. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000227-000
Goodyear, R. K. (2015). Using accountability mechanisms more intentionally: A framework
and its implications for training professional psychologists. American Psychologist, 70(8),
736–743. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039828
References 205
Goodyear, R. K., & Nelson, M. L. (1997). The major formats of psychotherapy supervision.
In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 328–344). John
Wiley & Sons.
Haggerty, G., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2011). The use of video in psychotherapy supervision. British
Journal of Psychotherapy, 27(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.2011.01232.x
Harris, J., Jin, J., Hoffman, S., Phan, S., Prout, T. A., Rousmaniere, T., & Vaz, A. (2022). Deliberate
practice in multicultural therapy [Manuscript in preparation]. American Psychological
Association.
Hatcher, R. L. (2015). Interpersonal competencies: Responsiveness, technique, and training in
psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 70(8), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039803
Heard, H. L., & Swales, M. A. (2016). Changing behavior in DBT: Problem solving in action.
Guilford Press.
Henry, W. P., Strupp, H. H., Butler, S. F., Schacht, T. E., & Binder, J. L. (1993). Effects of training in
time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: Changes in therapist behavior. Journal of Consulting
and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.3.434
Hill, C. E., Kivlighan, D. M., III, Rousmaniere, T., Kivlighan, D. M., Jr., Gerstenblith, J. A., &
Hillman, J. W. (2020). Deliberate practice for the skill of immediacy: A multiple case study
of doctoral student therapists and clients. Psychotherapy, 57(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/
10.1037/pst0000247
Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2013). Training and supervision in psychotherapy: Evidence for effective
practice. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed.,
pp. 775–811). John Wiley & Sons.
Kendall, P. C., & Beidas, R. S. (2007). Smoothing the trail for dissemination of evidence-based
practices for youth: Flexibility within fidelity. Professional Psychology, Research and
Practice, 38(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.1.13
Kendall, P. C., & Frank, H. E. (2018). Implementing evidence-based treatment protocols: Flexi-
bility within fidelity. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 25(4), e12271. https://
doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12271
Koerner, K., & Linehan, M. M. (2003). Validation principles and strategies. In W. O’Donohue,
J. E. Fisher, & S. C. Hayes (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 229–237). John Wiley
& Sons, Inc.
Koziol, L. F., & Budding, D. E. (2012). Procedural learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of
the sciences of learning (pp. 2694–2696). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-
1428-6_670
Lambert, M. J. (2010). Yes, it is time for clinicians to monitor treatment outcome. In B. L.
Duncan, S. C. Miller, B. E. Wampold, & M. A. Hubble (Eds.), Heart and soul of change:
Delivering what works in therapy (2nd ed., pp. 239–266). American Psychological Asso-
ciation. https://doi.org/10.1037/12075-008
Landes, S. (2018). Conducting effective behavioural and solution analyses. In M. Swales (Ed.),
The Oxford handbook of dialectical behavior therapy (pp. 259–282). Oxford University Press.
Linehan, M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford
Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder.
Guilford Press.
Linehan, M. M. (1997). Validation and psychotherapy. In A. C. Bohart & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.),
Empathy reconsidered: New directions in psychotherapy (pp. 353–392). American Psycho-
logical Association.
Linehan, M. M. (2016). Linehan Risk Assessment and Management Protocol (LRAMP). https://
depts.washington.edu/uwbrtc/wp-content/uploads/LSSN-LRAMP-v1.0.pdf
Linehan, M. M., & Schmidt, H. III. (1995). The dialectics of effective treatment of borderline
personality disorder. In W. O’Donohue & L. Krasner (Eds.), Theories of behavior therapy:
Exploring behavior change (pp. 553–584). American Psychological Association. https://
doi.org/10.1037/10169-020
Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Accountability and close-call counterfactuals: The
loser who nearly won and the winner who nearly lost. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 26(10), 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262004
206 References
McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2014). A critical review of
simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Medical Education, 48(4),
375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12391
McLeod, J. (2017). Qualitative methods for routine outcome measurement. In T. G. Rousmaniere,
R. Goodyear, D. D. Miller, & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), The cycle of excellence: Using deliberate
practice to improve supervision and training (pp. 99–122). John Wiley & Sons. https://
doi.org/10.1002/9781119165590.ch5
McMain, S., Korman, L. M., & Dimeff, L. (2001). Dialectical behavior therapy and the treatment
of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/
10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2%3C183::AID-JCLP5%3E3.0.CO;2-Y
McMain, S., Leybman, M., & Boritz, T. (2019). Case formulation in dialectical behaviour therapy.
In U. Kramer (Ed.), Case formulation for personality disorders (pp. 1–18). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813521-1.00001-1
McMain, S., & Wiebe, C. (2013). Dialectical behavior therapy for emotion dysregulation [Video].
Psychotherapy.net.
Mehlum, L. (2018). DBT as a suicide and self-harm treatment: Assessing and treating suicidal
behaviours. In M. Swales (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of dialectical behavior therapy
(pp. 307–324). Oxford University Press.
Norcross, J. C., & Guy, J. D. (2005). The prevalence and parameters of personal therapy in the
United States. In J. D. Geller, J. C. Norcross, & D. E. Orlinsky (Eds.), The psychotherapist’s
own psychotherapy: Patient and clinician perspectives (pp. 165–176). Oxford University
Press.
Norcross, J. C., Lambert, M. J., & Wampold, B. E. (2019). Psychotherapy relationships that
work (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Orlinsky, D. E., Rønnestad, M. H., & Collaborative Research Network of the Society for Psycho-
therapy Research. (2005). How psychotherapists develop: A study of therapeutic work
and professional growth. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/
11157-000
Owen, J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2014). Treatment adherence: The importance of therapist flexi-
bility in relation to therapy outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 280–288.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035753
Pederson, L. (2015). Dialectical behavior therapy: A contemporary guide for practitioners.
Wiley-Blackwell.
Prescott, D. S., Maeschalck, C. L., & Miller, S. D. (2017). Feedback-informed treatment in clinical
practice: Reaching for excellence. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/
10.1037/0000039-000
Rizvi, S. L. (2011). The therapeutic relationship in dialectical behavior therapy for suicidal indi-
viduals. In K. Michel & D. A. Jobes (Eds.), Building a therapeutic alliance with the suicidal
patient (pp. 255–271). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/
12303-014
Rousmaniere, T. G. (2016). Deliberate practice for psychotherapists: A guide to improv-
ing clinical effectiveness. Routledge Press/Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/
9781315472256
Rousmaniere, T. G. (2019). Mastering the inner skills of psychotherapy: A deliberate practice
handbook. Gold Lantern Press.
Rousmaniere, T. G., Goodyear, R., Miller, S. D., & Wampold, B. E. (Eds.). (2017). The cycle
of excellence: Using deliberate practice to improve supervision and training. Wiley
Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119165590
Sayrs, J. H. R., & Linehan, M. M. (2019). DBT teams: Development and practice. Guilford Press.
Shearin, E. N., & Linehan, M. M. (1992). Patient–therapist ratings and relationship to prog-
ress in dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder. Behavior Therapy,
23(4), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80232-1
Shneidman, E. S. (1992). A conspectus of the suicidal scenario. In R. W. Maris, A. L. Berman,
J. T. Maltsberger, & R. I. Yufit (Eds.), Assessment and prediction of suicide (pp. 50–64).
Guilford Press.
References 207
Sonley, A., Boritz, T., & McMain, S. (in press). Applications of dialectical behavior therapy. In
G. Gabbard (Ed.), Textbook of psychotherapeutic treatments (2nd ed.). American Psychi-
atric Publishing.
Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neuro-
biology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005
Stiles, W. B., Honos-Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical
Psychology: Science and Practice, 5(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.
tb00166.x
Stiles, W. B., & Horvath, A. O. (2017). Appropriate responsiveness as a contribution to ther-
apist effects. In L. G. Castonguay & C. E. Hill (Eds.), How and why are some therapists
better than others? Understanding therapist effects (pp. 71–84). American Psychological
Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000034-005
Stoffers, J. M., Völlm, B. A., Rücker, G., Timmer, A., Huband, N., & Lieb, K. (2012). Psychological
therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. The Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews, 2012(8), CD005652.
Storebø, O. J., Stoffers-Winterling, J. M., Völlm, B. A., Kongerslev, M. T., Mattivi, J. T., Jørgensen,
M. S., Faltinsen, E., Todorovac, A., Sales, C. P., Callesen, H. E., Lieb, K., & Simonsen, E.
(2020). Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews, 5(5), CD012955.
Swales, M., & Dunkley, C. (2020). Principles of skills assessment in dialectical behavior therapy.
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 27(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.05.001
Swenson, C. (in press). Applications of dialectical behavior therapy. In G. Gabbard (Ed.),
Textbook of psychotherapeutic treatments (2nd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
Taylor, J. M., & Neimeyer, G. J. (2017). Lifelong professional improvement: The evolution of
continuing education. In T. G. Rousmaniere, R. Goodyear, S. D. Miller, & B. Wampold (Eds.),
The cycle of excellence: Using deliberate practice to improve supervision and training
(pp. 219–248). John Wiley & Sons.
Tracey, T. J. G., Wampold, B. E., Goodyear, R. K., & Lichtenberg, J. W. (2015). Improving expertise
in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Bulletin, 50(1), 7–13.
Tullos, J. M. (Director & Producer), & Governors State University, Division of Digital Learning
and Media Design (Producer). (2014). Dialectical behavior therapy [Video/DVD]. American
Psychological Association. https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/dialectical-behavior-
therapy-2
Waltz, J. L., Fruzzetti, A. E., & Linehan, M. M. (1998). The role of supervision in dialectical behavior
therapy. The Clinical Supervisor, 17(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v17n01_09
Wass, R., & Golding, C. (2014). Sharpening a tool for teaching: The zone of proximal devel
opment. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.
2014.901958
Yalom, V., Yalom, M.-H., Sharp, B., Grashuis, H., Linehan, M., & Read, K. (2013). 3 approaches
to personality disorders: 3-Video series. Psychotherapy.net.
Zaretskii, V. (2009). The zone of proximal development: What Vygotsky did not have time
to write. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 47(6), 70–93. https://doi.org/
10.2753/RPO1061-0405470604
Index
A
Acceptance inviting the client to engage in problem solving with, 80, 82,
balance between change and, 3, 9, 10, 131 84, 85, 87
key treatment strategies for, 10 mock therapy session with, 169–170
validation as core strategy for, 11, 35 modifying cognitions with, 102, 106, 109
of what cannot be changed, 131 problem assessment with, 59, 61–66
Accountability promoting dialectical thinking through both–and statements
outcome, 182 with, 136, 139
process, 182 reinforcing adaptive behaviors with, 50–55
Active effort, 183 responding to suicidal ideation with, 146, 149
Adaptive behaviors, reinforcement of, 11, 47–48. See also skills training with, 92, 93, 95–97, 99
Reinforcing Adaptive Behaviors (exercise 3) validation with, 37, 39, 41, 42, 44
Adaptive coping strategies, 79, 111 Annotated Dialectical Behavior Therapy Practice Session
Advanced dialectical behavior therapy skills, 4, 11, 12 Transcript (exercise 13), 13–14, 151–163
in annotated session transcript, 157–159, 161, 162 demo round of, 176
coaching clients in distress, 121–129 function of, 177–178
informal exposure to emotions, 111–119 instructions for, 151
promoting dialectical thinking through both–and statements, in sample syllabus, 198
131–139 Anxious clients
responding to suicidal ideation, 141–149 in distress, coaching, 124, 125, 127, 128
Advanced-level client statements and profiles, 4, 13, 14 eliciting a commitment with, 73, 74, 76, 77
for coaching clients in distress, 126, 129 informal exposure to emotions with, 114, 115, 117, 118
for eliciting a commitment, 74, 77 inviting the client to engage in problem solving with, 83, 84,
for establishing a session agenda, 30, 33 86, 87
for informal exposure to emotions, 116, 119 mock therapy session with, 168–169
for inviting the client to engage in problem solving, 84, 87 modifying cognitions with, 102, 104, 107
for mock therapy sessions, 170 problem assessment with, 59
for modifying cognitions, 106, 109 promoting dialectical thinking through both–and statements
for problem assessment, 63, 66 with, 134, 136, 137, 139
for promoting dialectical thinking through both–and responding to suicidal ideation with, 144, 146, 147, 149
statements, 136, 139 skills training with, 94, 98
for reinforcing adaptive behaviors, 52, 55 APA (American Psychological Association), 200
for responding to suicidal ideation, 145, 149 Appropriate responsiveness, 165, 178
for skills training, 95, 99 Ashamed clients
for validation, 41, 44 in distress, coaching, 124, 125, 127, 128
Agitated clients, responding to suicidal ideation with, 144, 147 eliciting a commitment with, 70, 74, 77
Ambivalent clients, mock therapy session with, 169 establishing a session agenda with, 26, 29, 30, 32, 33
American Psychological Association (APA), 200 informal exposure to emotions with, 112, 114–119
Angry clients inviting the client to engage in problem solving with, 80, 82–87
in distress, coaching, 122, 125, 126, 128, 129 mock therapy session with, 169
eliciting a commitment with, 72–77 modifying cognitions with, 105, 108
informal exposure to emotions with, 114–119 problem assessment with, 58–59, 61–66
209
210 Index
F H
Failure, opportunities for, 5 Haggerty, G., 180–181
Fear Happy clients
of emotions, 111 establishing a session agenda with, 29, 32
in “pushing through” exercises, 181 reinforcing adaptive behaviors with, 50, 53
Feedback Harris, J., 6
behavioral, 19 High-risk behaviors, 3
brief, 19 Hilsenroth, M. J., 180–181
corrective, 5, 166, 180, 181 Homework, 20, 199
criteria for, 19 Hopeless clients
in deliberate practice, 5, 18 eliciting a commitment with, 73, 76
expanding, 190 modifying cognitions with, 104, 105, 107, 108
incremental, 181 reinforcing adaptive behaviors with, 51, 54
responding to suicidal ideation with, 145, 148
instructions on giving/receiving, 18, 19
Horvath, A. O., 178
for learning/mastering skills, 6
Hurt clients
in mock sessions, 166
modifying cognitions with, 106, 109
on observed practice, 181
skills training with, 95, 99
from peers, 17
Hyperventilating clients
specific, 19, 181
in distress, coaching, 126, 129
from supervisors, 4
responding to suicidal ideation with, 145, 148
Final evaluation, 20
validation with, 41, 44
“Finding your own voice,” 177
Flexibility, 4 I
decision making principles for, 10
Improvisation
of responses, 19, 178
in deliberate practice exercises, 7, 8, 176, 177
of therapist responses, 3, 8 as goal of role-play, 19
Flow, 183 Incremental feedback, 181
Focus Incremental goals, 6
of practice sessions, 11 Individualized case formulation, 3
of therapy sessions, 25. See also Establishing a Session Individual therapy, 10
Agenda (exercise 1) Informal Exposure to Emotions (exercise 9), 4, 11, 12, 111–119
Frustrated clients in annotated session transcript, 157–159
eliciting a commitment with, 72–77 client statements, 114–116
informal exposure to emotions with, 115, 118 examples of, 19, 112
inviting the client to engage in problem solving with, 83, 86 instructions for, 113
modifying cognitions with, 105, 108 preparations for, 111
problem assessment with, 62, 65 in sample syllabus, 198
promoting dialectical thinking through both–and statements skill criteria, 112
with, 132, 135, 138 skill description, 111–112
reinforcing adaptive behaviors with, 48, 50–55 therapist responses, 117–119
skills training with, 94, 98 Information processing, emotional arousal interfering with, 35
validation with, 37, 39–44 Instructions, exercise, 13, 14, 17–20
Fun, 184 Intense exercise, as TIPP skill, 121, 122
Intermediate dialectical behavior therapy skills, 4, 11–12
G in annotated session transcript, 154–163
Gladwell, Malcolm, 6 eliciting a commitment, 69–77
Goals inviting the client to engage in problem solving, 79–87
agreement in working toward, 69 modifying cognitions, 101–109
of deliberate practice, 5, 19, 184 skills training, 89–99
of dialectical behavior therapy, 10, 89, 111 Intermediate-level client statements and profiles, 4, 13, 14
highly individualized, 182 for coaching clients in distress, 125, 128
incremental, 6 for eliciting a commitment, 73, 76
214 Index
Reinforcing Adaptive Behaviors (exercise 3), 4, 11, 47–55 Self-harm behaviors. See also Suicidal behaviors
in annotated session transcript, 157–163 as attempt to regulate emotion, 9
client statements, 50–52 managing, in DBT, 12–13
examples of, 48 mock therapy session for, 170
instructions for, 49 with severe emotion dysregulation, 141
preparations for, 47 as therapy session priority, 25
in sample syllabus, 198 Self-monitoring, 179
skill criteria, 48 Sessions
skill description, 47 mock, 14. See also Mock sessions
therapist responses, 53–55 practice. See Practice sessions
Repetition, for mastery, 8 therapy, establishing agenda for. See Establishing a Session
Required readings, on syllabus, 198–201 Agenda (exercise 1)
Responding to Suicidal Ideation (exercise 12), 4, 11, 12, 141–149 Shaping, 47
in annotated session transcript, 159 Shearin, E. N., 13
client statements, 144–146 Simulation-based mastery learning, 8
examples of, 142 Skill acquisition, behavioral rehearsal vs., 181
instructions for, 143 Skill criteria
preparations for, 141 exercise, 18–19. See also individual exercises
in sample syllabus, 198 feedback on, 19
skill criteria, 142 Skills
skill description, 141–142 deliberate practice of, 6–9
therapist responses, 147–149 in dialectical behavior therapy. See Dialectical behavior
Responsiveness, 4, 19 therapy skills
appropriate, 165, 178 distress tolerance, 89, 90, 121
decision making principles for, 10 feedback on, 6
in treatment, 178–179 key activities in learning/mastering, 6
Review and feedback sequence, 19 knowledge vs., 181
Rizvi, S. L., 13 perceptual, 178
Role-play, 4, 10, 17 Skills labs, on syllabus, 198, 199
difficulty levels of, 179 Skills Training (exercise 7), 4, 11, 12, 89–99
emotional expression in, 175–176 in annotated session transcript, 157, 162
goal of, 19 client statements, 93–95
guiding training partners in difficulty of, 183 examples of, 90–91
of initial therapy session. See Mock Systemic Family Therapy instructions for, 92
Sessions (exercise 14) preparations for, 89
in mock sessions, 165–166 in sample syllabus, 198
preparation for, 18 skill criteria, 90
realistic emotional expression in, 151, 175–176 skill description, 89–90
Ronnestad, M. H., 186 therapist responses, 96–99
Skills training group therapy, 10
S Specific feedback, 19, 181
Sad clients State-dependent learning, 8
in distress, coaching, 125, 128 Stiles, W. B., 178
eliciting a commitment with, 72, 74, 75, 77 STOP skills, 89, 90
establishing a session agenda with, 28–33 Structuring therapy time, 11, 25
informal exposure to emotions with, 112, 114, 115, 117, 118 Substance use
inviting the client to engage in problem solving with, 82–87 as attempt to regulate emotion, 9
mock therapy session with, 168 for escape, 132
modifying cognitions with, 99, 104–109 Suffering, 9
problem assessment with, 61–66 Suicidal behaviors
promoting dialectical thinking through both–and statements as attempt to regulate emotion, 9
with, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138 managing, in DBT, 12–13
reinforcing adaptive behaviors with, 50, 51, 53, 54 with severe emotion dysregulation, 141
responding to suicidal ideation with, 142, 145, 146, 148, 149 suicide attempts as therapy session priority, 25
skills training with, 93, 96 therapist responses to, 142
validation with, 37, 39, 40, 42, 43 as therapy session priority, 25
Sample session transcript, 14. See also Annotated Dialectical Suicidal communications, as therapy session priority, 25
Behavior Therapy Practice Session Transcript (exercise 13) Suicidal ideations
Sample syllabus, 5, 10, 11, 14 alternative solutions to, 141–142
Scared clients, informal exposure to emotions with, 116, 119 contexts of, 141
Self-awareness, 179, 180 problems driving, 131
Self-disclosure, 180, 199, 200 responding to, 12. See also Responding to Suicidal Ideation
Self-efficacy, supporting, 179 (exercise 12)
Self-evaluation, 180–182, 200 as therapy session priority, 25
Index 217
221
222 About the Authors