0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Unit 4 Mobile Computing Notes by Amit Patils Engineering Classes

Uploaded by

prafulljaiswal6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Unit 4 Mobile Computing Notes by Amit Patils Engineering Classes

Uploaded by

prafulljaiswal6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 44

1

UNIT 4…………………….

Q1) EXPLAIN LOCATION AIDED ROUTING SCHEME WITH


EXAMPLES OF EXPECTED ZONE

Location-Aided Routing Scheme Explained with Example Zones

Location-aided routing (LAR) is a routing protocol used in mobile ad hoc networks


(MANETs) where devices dynamically establish temporary connections without
relying on fixed infrastructure. LAR leverages the knowledge of device locations
to optimize routing, making it more efficient and less resource-intensive.

Here's how LAR works:

1. Zone formation: Each device knows its location (often obtained through
GPS) and defines a virtual zone around itself, typically circular. This zone
encompasses potential next-hop nodes for forwarding data packets. The size
of the zone can be adjusted based on network density and desired
transmission range.
2. Route discovery: When a device needs to send data to another device
(destination), it broadcasts a route request message only within its defined
zone. This significantly reduces the number of routing messages compared
to traditional flooding techniques used in MANETs.
3. Next-hop selection: Devices within the zone that receive the route request
message check their location relative to the destination. The node closest to
the destination in the direction of the destination becomes the chosen next
hop.
4. Data forwarding: The source device sends the data packet to the chosen
next hop, which then forwards it based on the same LAR principles until it
reaches the destination.

Benefits of LAR:

• Reduced routing overhead: By limiting route discovery to a smaller zone,


LAR significantly reduces the number of routing messages compared to
traditional flooding, saving precious bandwidth and battery power.
2

• Improved routing efficiency: Selecting the next hop based on proximity to


the destination leads to shorter paths and faster data delivery.
• Scalability: LAR adapts well to changes in network topology as devices
move around.

Example Zones:

• Sparse network: In a network with few devices, the zones can be larger to
ensure sufficient candidate next hops are available. Imagine a group of
hikers scattered across a mountain trail. Their zones might have a radius of
100 meters to account for the distance between them.
• Dense network: In a crowded environment like a conference hall, zones
might be smaller to avoid excessive overlap and interference. Each person's
zone could be just a few meters wide.

Additional considerations:

• Location accuracy: LAR's effectiveness depends on the accuracy of device


location information. GPS errors can lead to suboptimal routing choices.
• Security: Location information can be sensitive, so secure mechanisms are
needed to protect it from unauthorized access.

Q2) EXPLAIN ROUTING NEED FOR ROUTING WHAT ARE THE


MAJOR GOALS WHEN SELECTING ROUTING PROTOCOL?

Why Routing is Needed and Major Goals When Selecting a Protocol

1. Need for Routing:

Data packets traversing a network like the internet or even your home network
need direction. Routing protocols provide that direction, acting like roadmaps for
digital information. Here's why routing is crucial:

• Connecting multiple networks: Without routing, information wouldn't


know where to go within or between different networks. Routers use routing
3

protocols to exchange information about available paths and choose the best
route for each packet.
• Scalability and efficiency: Routing protocols allow networks to handle
large volumes of data by distributing traffic across multiple paths. This
prevents congestion and ensures efficient delivery.
• Resilience and flexibility: Networks constantly change due to link failures,
new connections, or traffic fluctuations. Routing protocols help routers adapt
to these changes by dynamically updating their routing tables, ensuring
uninterrupted data flow.

2. Major Goals When Selecting a Routing Protocol:

Choosing the right routing protocol depends on your specific network needs and
priorities. Here are some key goals to consider:

• Optimal routing: Finding the fastest, most reliable path for data packets
often involves factors like bandwidth, delay, cost, and congestion. Different
protocols prioritize different metrics, so choosing one aligned with your
network's priorities is crucial.
• Stability and convergence: Routing protocols should quickly adapt to
network changes to minimize disruptions and delays. Look for protocols
known for fast convergence times and stable routing tables.
• Scalability and efficiency: The chosen protocol should handle the volume
and complexity of your network without overwhelming resources. Consider
scalability as your network grows.
• Security and control: Some protocols offer features like authentication and
encryption to ensure data integrity and prevent unauthorized access. Choose
a protocol that aligns with your security requirements.
• Ease of management and configuration: Consider the complexity of
configuring and managing the protocol, especially for large networks.

Common Routing Protocols:

• Static routing: Manually configured, suitable for small, stable networks.


• Dynamic routing: Adapts to changes automatically, better for larger,
dynamic networks. Examples include OSPF, RIP, and EIGRP.
• Policy-based routing: Allows granular control over traffic routing based on
specific criteria.
4

Q3) EXPLAIN CGSR PROTOCOL?

CGSR Protocol Explained: Cluster-head Gateway Switch Routing

The Cluster-head Gateway Switch Routing (CGSR) protocol is a hierarchical,


proactive routing protocol designed for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). It
works by forming clusters of devices and utilizing designated cluster heads to
efficiently route data packets.

Here's how CGSR operates:

1. Cluster Formation: Devices in the network dynamically self-organize into


clusters, each with a chosen cluster head. Cluster heads are typically the nodes
with the highest remaining energy or strongest connectivity.

2. Information Exchange:

• Cluster-member tables: Each cluster head maintains a table containing the


IDs of its member nodes and their most recent sequence numbers.
• Routing tables: Each node maintains a routing table containing the next hop
(cluster head) to reach any other cluster in the network.

3. Routing Process:

• Cluster-internal routing: Nodes within a cluster send data directly to their


respective cluster head.
• Cluster-external routing: When a node wants to send data to a node in
another cluster, it follows these steps:
o It consults its routing table to identify the next hop cluster head
(gateway) towards the destination cluster.
o It sends the data packet to its local cluster head.
o The cluster head forwards the packet to the gateway cluster head
using the previously mentioned information exchange mechanisms.
o This process repeats until the packet reaches the destination cluster
head.
o Finally, the destination cluster head delivers the packet to the intended
recipient node within its cluster.
5

Benefits of CGSR:

• Reduced routing overhead: Compared to flooding techniques, CGSR


significantly reduces the number of routing messages by limiting them
within clusters and relying on cluster heads for inter-cluster communication.
• Improved scalability: The hierarchical structure efficiently handles large
networks by reducing the burden on individual nodes.
• Faster routing: Cluster heads act as relay points, reducing the number of
hops required for data delivery.
• Improved energy efficiency: By minimizing unnecessary broadcasts,
CGSR conserves battery power on individual nodes.

Limitations of CGSR:

• Cluster head dependence: Network performance can be impacted if cluster


heads have insufficient resources or become unavailable.
• Overhead of maintaining tables: Keeping routing and cluster member
tables updated requires some processing power and bandwidth.
• Less suitable for highly dynamic networks: Frequent changes in network
topology might lead to frequent cluster re-formations and updates, affecting
efficiency.

Q4) LIST AND EXPLAIN ANY FOUR APPLICATION OF MANET?

Four Applications of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs):

1. Emergency and Disaster Response:


o Imagine a natural disaster where traditional infrastructure is damaged.
MANETs can be quickly deployed by rescue teams to establish
communication despite the lack of fixed networks. This allows for:
▪ Coordinating search and rescue operations.
▪ Sharing critical information like patient status and resource
availability.
6

▪ Maintaining communication among first responders and


disaster management teams.
2. Military and Tactical Operations:
o In battlefield scenarios, secure and dynamic communication is crucial.
MANETs enable soldiers to:
▪ Share situational awareness and intelligence data in real-time.
▪ Coordinate troop movements and attack strategies.
▪ Maintain communication even when fixed infrastructure is
compromised.
3. Sensor Networks and Environmental Monitoring:
o Wireless sensor networks often rely on MANETs for efficient data
collection and communication. This can be used in various
applications, such as:
▪ Monitoring environmental conditions like temperature,
humidity, and pollution levels.
▪ Tracking wildlife populations and animal migration patterns.
▪ Monitoring agricultural fields and optimizing resource
allocation.
4. Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs):
o MANETs form the foundation of VANETs, which connect vehicles
and roadside infrastructure to improve traffic safety and efficiency.
This allows for:
▪ Sharing real-time traffic information and warnings about
accidents, hazards, and road closures.
▪ Coordinating traffic flow and reducing congestion.
▪ Enabling autonomous vehicles to communicate with each other
and surrounding infrastructure.!

Q5) WHAT ARE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AND


HOE NETWORK AND SENSOR NETWORK

Similarities between MANETs and Sensor Networks:

Both MANETs and sensor networks share some key characteristics:


7

• Infrastructure-less: Both operate without relying on a central infrastructure


like base stations or fixed routers. Nodes self-organize and dynamically
establish communication links with each other.
• Wireless communication: Both utilize wireless channels for data
transmission, typically using radio frequencies.
• Multi-hop routing: Data packets may traverse multiple nodes before
reaching their destination, especially in larger networks.
• Ad-hoc nature: Both networks can be deployed and reconfigured quickly
without extensive planning or pre-existing infrastructure.
• Limited resources: Nodes in both types of networks often have limited
processing power, memory, and battery life. This necessitates energy-
efficient protocols and algorithms.

Differences between MANETs and Sensor Networks:

Despite their similarities, several key differences distinguish MANETs and sensor
networks:

1. Node functionality:

• MANETs: Nodes are typically mobile devices like laptops, smartphones, or


tablets. They have diverse functionalities and participate actively in routing
and forwarding data.

Opens in a new window


www.researchgate.net

MANET mobile node

• Sensor networks: Nodes are mostly dedicated sensors with limited


processing power and communication capabilities. Their primary function is
to gather and transmit sensor data.
8

Opens in a new window


www.researchgate.net

sensor network node

2. Network size and density:

• MANETs: Typically have a smaller number of nodes, ranging from tens to


hundreds.
• Sensor networks: Can have thousands or even tens of thousands of nodes
deployed over a large area.

3. Mobility:

• MANETs: Nodes are typically mobile and can change their positions
dynamically.
• Sensor networks: Nodes are usually static or have limited mobility.

4. Data type and routing:

• MANETs: Nodes can handle various data types, including text, images, and
audio. Routing protocols prioritize factors like bandwidth, delay, and
reliability.
• Sensor networks: Nodes primarily deal with sensor data, often small and
time-sensitive. Routing protocols are optimized for energy efficiency and
data aggregation.

5. Applications:

• MANETs: Suitable for applications like emergency response, military


operations, and vehicular communication.
9

• Sensor networks: Used in environmental monitoring, industrial automation,


and healthcare applications.

Q6) WHAT IS ROUTING ? WHAT ARE THE GOALS OF MANET


ROUTING?

Routing: Guiding Data Packets on Their Journey

Imagine you're sending a letter to a friend in another city. You put the address on
the envelope, but how does that letter actually get to its destination? That's where
routing comes in!

Routing is the process of directing data packets across a network from their
source (the sender) to their destination (the receiver). Think of it like a roadmap for
digital information, guiding packets through the intricate web of interconnected
devices.

Here's how it works:

1. Data packets: Information you send online, like emails, videos, or even this
chat message, is broken down into small, manageable units called data
packets. Each packet has a header containing the source and destination
addresses.
2. Routers: These are specialized devices that act as traffic cops, reading the
destination address on each packet and forwarding it towards the next hop in
its journey.
3. Routing tables: Routers maintain tables that map network addresses to
specific paths or other routers. Based on the destination address in the
packet's header, the router consults its table to find the best route to send it
on.
4. Hops: Each time a packet is forwarded to another router, it takes a "hop."
The goal is to find the route with the fewest hops to reach the destination
efficiently.
10

5. Delivery: Finally, the packet arrives at the destination router, which


recognizes its own local address and delivers it to the intended recipient
device.

Now, let's delve into the specific world of MANET routing, which tackles the
unique challenges of mobile ad hoc networks:

MANETs are dynamic networks formed by mobile devices like laptops,


smartphones, or sensors, without relying on any fixed infrastructure. These devices
act as both routers and data senders/receivers, constantly changing their positions.
This makes routing in MANETs much more complex compared to traditional fixed
networks.

Goals of MANET routing:

• Connectivity: Ensure reliable communication between any two nodes in the


network, even if they're constantly moving.
• Efficiency: Find the shortest or fastest paths for data packets to minimize
transmission delays and conserve battery power on mobile devices.
• Scalability: Adapt to changes in network topology as devices join or leave
the network, maintaining efficient routing even with a large number of
nodes.
• Energy-efficiency: Minimize the energy consumption of routing protocols
and data transmission to extend the battery life of mobile devices.
• Security: Protect routing information and data packets from unauthorized
access or manipulation.

MANET routing protocols employ various strategies to achieve these goals,


including:

• Proactive routing: Nodes maintain updated routing tables, even if they


haven't yet communicated with specific destinations.
• Reactive routing: Nodes discover routes on demand, only when needed,
reducing overhead in smaller networks.
• Location-aided routing: Utilizes node location information (GPS, etc.) to
make better routing decisions.
11

Q7) EXPLAIN DIFFERANCE BETWEEN CELLUAR NETWORK AND


HOC NETWORK

Both cellular networks and ad hoc networks facilitate wireless communication, but
they differ significantly in their architecture, functionality, and applications:

Cellular Network:

• Infrastructure-based: Relies on a network of fixed base stations that


provide coverage to mobile devices within their range.
• Centralized control: Base stations coordinate communication, manage
resources, and handle routing.
• Star topology: Devices connect directly to the base station within their cell,
forming a star-like structure.
• Circuit switching or packet switching: Traditionally uses circuit switching
for voice calls and packet switching for data.
• High performance and reliability: Offers wide coverage, high data rates,
and reliable connections due to controlled infrastructure.
• Higher cost and limited flexibility: Deployment and maintenance of base
stations are expensive, and network customization is limited due to its
centralized nature.
• Examples: 4G, 5G mobile networks used for phone calls, internet access,
etc.

Ad Hoc Network:

• Infrastructure-less: Devices self-organize and form temporary, dynamic


connections without relying on base stations.
• Distributed control: Nodes share responsibility for routing, resource
management, and network maintenance.
• Mesh topology: Devices connect directly with each other, forming a web-
like mesh structure.
• Packet switching: Primarily uses packet switching for data communication.
• Scalability and adaptability: Easy to deploy and reconfigure, often used in
temporary or emergency situations.
• Lower cost and flexibility: No need for base stations, offering more
flexibility in network configuration.
• Lower performance and reliability: Connection range and stability are
limited due to dependence on individual node capabilities and dynamic
topology.
12

• Examples: Sensor networks, emergency response networks, temporary


gaming networks, etc.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences:

Feature Cellular Network Ad Hoc Network


Infrastructure Base stations None
Control Centralized Distributed
Topology Star Mesh
Switching Circuit/Packet Packet
Performance High Moderate
Reliability High Moderate
Cost High Low
Flexibility Low High
Mobile communication, Sensor networks, temporary networks,
Applications
internet access emergency response

Q8) WHAT DESIGN ISSUES ARE CONSIDERED IN SENSOR


NETWORK?

Designing a sensor network involves balancing functionality with resource


limitations. Several key design issues need careful consideration to ensure an
efficient and effective network:

1. Energy efficiency: Sensor nodes are often battery-powered and have limited
capacity. Choosing energy-efficient protocols and minimizing unnecessary
communication are crucial to maximize network lifetime. Examples include duty
cycling (sleeping when not needed), data aggregation before transmission, and
multi-hop routing with fewer hops.

2. Scalability and coverage: Sensor networks can have hundreds or even


thousands of nodes deployed over a large area. The network design should adapt to
varying node density and ensure adequate coverage without redundancy. Cluster-
13

based approaches and dynamic routing protocols can help address scalability
challenges.

3. Data quality and reliability: Sensor data can be prone to noise, errors, and
inconsistencies. The network design should incorporate strategies for data
validation, error correction, and outlier detection to ensure reliable and accurate
data collection.

4. Security and privacy: Sensor networks may handle sensitive data, making them
vulnerable to security threats. Encryption, authentication techniques, and secure
routing protocols are necessary to protect against unauthorized access, data
tampering, and privacy breaches.

5. Fault tolerance and resilience: Sensor nodes can malfunction or become


unavailable due to battery depletion, environmental factors, or physical damage.
The network should be designed to tolerate such failures and maintain connectivity
by employing redundancy mechanisms and efficient recovery protocols.

6. Hardware constraints: Sensor nodes have limited processing power, memory,


and communication range. The network design needs to consider these limitations
and use lightweight protocols and algorithms that operate efficiently on resource-
constrained devices.

7. Communication protocols: Selecting suitable routing protocols (proactive,


reactive, location-based) is crucial for efficient data transmission while balancing
energy consumption and delay considerations. Additionally, media access control
(MAC) protocols need to be optimized for collision avoidance and reliable data
exchange in dense networks.

8. Application-specific considerations: The specific application of the sensor


network (environmental monitoring, industrial automation, healthcare) influences
design choices. Data types, sampling rates, latency requirements, and security
needs will vary depending on the intended use case.

WHAT IS SOURCE INITIATED ON DEMAND NETWORK? EXPLAIN


DYNAMIC ROUTING IN BRIEF?
14

Source Initiated On-Demand Network vs. Dynamic Routing

Both "source initiated on-demand network" and "dynamic routing" are related to
routing within computer networks, but they're not identical concepts. Here's a
breakdown to clarify their differences:

Source Initiated On-Demand Network:

• This refers to a specific type of network where routes are established only
when they are needed by a source node. Instead of maintaining pre-
existing paths to all destinations, nodes in this network only discover routes
when they have actual data to send.
• Examples: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad hoc On-Demand Distance
Vector Routing (AODV), Temporarily Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA)
• Benefits: Reduced routing overhead, improved scalability in large networks,
faster adaptation to network changes.
• Drawbacks: Slightly higher initial delay when establishing a new route,
increased processing on source nodes.

Dynamic Routing:

• This is a broader term encompassing routing protocols that adapt to


changes in the network topology. These protocols continuously update
their routing tables based on real-time information about available paths and
link status.
• Examples: OSPF (Open Shortest Path First), RIP (Routing Information
Protocol), EIGRP (Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol)
• Benefits: Improved efficiency and stability compared to static routes, faster
response to network changes, better load balancing.
• Drawbacks: Increased processing overhead and bandwidth consumption
compared to static routes, potential for routing loops in complex networks.

Essentially, all source-initiated on-demand networks are dynamic, but not all
dynamic routing protocols are source-initiated. While source-initiated networks
focus on route creation on demand, other dynamic protocols like OSPF update
existing routes proactively based on network changes.

Here's a table summarizing the key differences:

Source Initiated On-Demand


Feature Dynamic Routing
Network
15

Initiated by source node when


Route discovery Continuous and proactive
needed
Route Updated for all known
Updated only for used routes
maintenance routes
Reduced initially, may increase Increased compared to
Overhead
with new routes static routes
Scalable depending on
Scalability Highly scalable
protocol
Examples DSR, AODV, TORA OSPF, RIP, EIGRP

I hope this clarifies the distinction between source-initiated on-demand networks


and dynamic routing in general. If you have any further questions or want to delve
deeper into specific protocols, feel free to ask!

EXPLAIN ADDV ( ADHOC ON DEMAND DISTANCE VECTOR)


ROUTING PROTOCOL

AODV, or Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing, is a routing protocol


specifically designed for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Here's a breakdown
of its key features and functionalities:

Concept:

• AODV is a source-initiated on-demand routing protocol. This means that


routes are only discovered and established when a source node needs to send
data to a specific destination. This reduces routing overhead compared to
protocols that constantly maintain routes to all potential destinations.
• It utilizes a distance vector routing approach, where nodes share
information about their distance (number of hops) to other nodes in the
network. Routing decisions are made based on this hop count, with the goal
of finding the shortest path to the destination.

Operation:

1. Route Request (RREQ): When a source node wants to send data to a


destination it doesn't have a route for, it broadcasts an RREQ message. This
16

message contains the source's address, destination's address, and the source's
current sequence number.
2. Route Reply (RREP): Nodes that receive the RREQ update their routing
tables if they have a fresher route to the destination (higher sequence
number) or are the destination itself. They then send an RREP message back
to the source, containing the destination's address and the number of hops to
reach it.
3. Route establishment: The source chooses the RREP with the shortest hop
count to the destination and updates its routing table with the chosen path.
4. Data forwarding: Data packets are forwarded hop-by-hop along the
established path to the destination.
5. Route maintenance: Nodes periodically send Route Error (RERR)
messages when they detect a link break or a change in hop count to the
destination. This triggers other nodes to update their routing tables and
remove the broken path.

Benefits of AODV:

• Scalability: Efficiently handles large and dynamic MANETs due to on-


demand route discovery.
• Reduced overhead: Minimizes unnecessary routing messages compared to
continuous routing updates.
• Fast adaptation: Quickly reacts to network changes with dynamic route
maintenance.
• Loop-free routing: Employs sequence numbers to prevent routing loops.

Drawbacks of AODV:

• Higher initial delay: Setting up a new route can be slower than in proactive
protocols.
• Increased processing on source nodes: Source nodes perform more route
discovery tasks.
• Vulnerable to broadcast storms: Excessive RREQ messages can occur in
dense networks.

Overall, AODV is a robust and efficient routing protocol for MANETs,


offering a balance between scalability, resource efficiency, and reliable
routing. However, its dependence on source-initiated route discovery and
vulnerability to broadcast storms are aspects to consider for specific network
implementations.
17

Do you have any further questions about AODV or how it compares to other
routing protocols for MANETs? I'm happy to dive deeper into specific aspects!

Q11)COMPARE HIERACHICAL AND FLAT TOPOLOGIES FOR


SENSOR NETWORK?

Both hierarchical and flat topologies play a role in sensor network design, each
with its own advantages and disadvantages:

Hierarchical Topology:

• Structure: Network is organized in layers, with cluster heads managing


communication within clusters and relaying data to higher levels.
• Benefits:
o Scalability: Efficiently manages large networks by dividing them into
smaller, manageable clusters.
o Energy efficiency: Cluster heads aggregate and compress data before
forwarding, reducing overall network traffic and energy consumption.
o Improved reliability: Data loss is minimized as cluster heads act as
recovery points for failed nodes.
o Enhanced security: Hierarchical structure simplifies access control
and security measures.
• Drawbacks:
o Single point of failure: Cluster head failure can disrupt
communication within the cluster.
o Increased complexity: Designing and managing cluster hierarchy
requires additional effort.
o Potential delay: Data aggregation and relaying through multiple
levels can introduce some delay.

Flat Topology:

• Structure: All nodes have equal roles and communicate directly with each
other.
• Benefits:
o Simple and robust: Easy to deploy and manage, with no single point
of failure.
18

oLower latency: Data transmission is faster as it requires fewer hops.


o Flexible and adaptable: Network can easily adjust to changes in
node positions or failures.
• Drawbacks:
o Scalability limitations: Performance and efficiency can degrade
significantly in large networks due to increased traffic and collisions.
o Higher energy consumption: Direct communication between all
nodes requires more energy for each transmission.
o Security concerns: Broadcasting data across the network exposes it
to potential security vulnerabilities.

Choosing the right topology depends on several factors, including:

• Network size and density: Flat topology may be sufficient for small
networks, while hierarchical structure is beneficial for large-scale
deployments.
• Energy efficiency: Hierarchical topology typically minimizes energy
consumption in large networks.
• Latency requirements: Flat topology offers lower latency for time-
sensitive applications.
• Security considerations: Hierarchical topology simplifies access control
and security measures.
• Application requirements: Specific features like data aggregation or fault
tolerance might favor one topology over the other.

Q12) STATE ADVANTAGE AND DISADVANTAGES OF INFRARED


LANS ?

Advantages of Infrared LANs:

• Simple and affordable: Infrared (IR) technology is readily available and


requires minimal infrastructure compared to wired or wireless LANs. Setting
up an IR network often involves simply plugging IR adapters into existing
devices.
19

• Line-of-sight security: Signals only travel in straight lines, providing


inherent security as data cannot penetrate walls or obstructions. This makes
IR ideal for confidential communication within a confined space.
• No interference: IR signals don't interfere with radio frequencies used by
other wireless technologies like Wi-Fi or Bluetooth. This can be
advantageous in environments with high electromagnetic noise.
• Low power consumption: IR devices generally consume less power than
other wireless alternatives, extending battery life for portable devices.
• Point-to-point communication: IR can be used for focused communication
between specific devices, unlike Wi-Fi's broadcast nature, potentially
reducing network congestion.

Disadvantages of Infrared LANs:

• Limited range: IR signals have a short range, typically up to 30 meters


(100ft), depending on the device and environment. This restricts network
coverage compared to other technologies.
• Line-of-sight requirement: Signal requires a clear line of sight between
devices, making it susceptible to interruptions from physical obstacles or
movement within the network.
• Susceptibility to environmental factors: Sunlight, fog, and dust can
interfere with IR signals, potentially impacting network performance.
• Lower data transfer rates: IR technology typically offers lower data
transfer rates compared to other wireless options like Wi-Fi, limiting its
suitability for bandwidth-intensive applications.
• Limited device compatibility: Not all devices natively support IR
technology, requiring additional adapters for integration, and limiting
network flexibility.

Q13) WHAT ARE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAG OF WLAN


COMPARED TO WIRED LAN?

Both WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) and wired LANs play crucial roles in
connecting devices, but they have distinct advantages and disadvantages that make
them suitable for different situations. Here's a breakdown:

Advantages of WLAN:
20

• Mobility and flexibility: Devices can connect and move freely within the
network coverage area, eliminating the need for physical cables. This is ideal
for offices, homes, and public spaces where flexibility is desired.
• Easy installation and expansion: Setting up a WLAN is often simpler and
faster than installing cables throughout a building. Expansion is also easier,
as adding new devices only requires placing them within range of the
existing network.
• Reduced costs: Eliminating the need for extensive cabling can significantly
lower installation and maintenance costs compared to wired LANs.
• Scalability: WLANs can easily adapt to changes in network size and
demand. Adding access points can extend coverage and accommodate more
devices without major infrastructure changes.
• Aesthetics: Wireless connectivity eliminates unsightly cables, maintaining a
cleaner and more aesthetically pleasing work or living space.

Disadvantages of WLAN:

• Security concerns: WLANs are inherently less secure than wired networks,
as signals can potentially be intercepted if not properly secured. Strong
encryption and network security measures are crucial.
• Lower performance: While WLAN speeds have improved significantly,
they generally offer lower data transfer rates compared to wired connections,
which can impact performance for bandwidth-intensive applications.
• Range limitations: Signal strength and coverage can be affected by physical
obstructions, distance from access points, and interference from other
devices. Dead zones may exist within the network area.
• Reliability issues: Wireless connections can be more susceptible to
interference and disruptions from environmental factors or network
congestion, potentially leading to dropped connections or performance
fluctuations.
• Power consumption: Wireless devices, especially laptops and mobile
devices, tend to consume more power when relying on WLAN connectivity
compared to wired connections.

Advantages of wired LAN:

• Security: Wired connections offer superior security as signals are physically


confined within the network cables, making them less vulnerable to
eavesdropping or interference.
21

• Performance: Wired connections typically offer higher data transfer rates


and lower latency compared to WLANs, making them ideal for applications
requiring high bandwidth and fast response times.
• Reliability: Wired connections are generally more reliable and less prone to
interference or dropouts, providing a more stable and consistent network
experience.
• Power efficiency: Devices connected via cables consume less power
compared to relying on wireless connectivity, extending battery life for
laptops and mobile devices.
• Cost-effectiveness: While initial installation costs can be higher compared
to WLANs, wired networks often require less maintenance and offer cost
savings in the long run.

Disadvantages of wired LAN:

• Limited mobility: Devices are restricted by the length of their cables,


limiting movement and flexibility within the network area.
• Installation complexity: Cabling can be difficult and time-consuming to
install, especially in buildings without existing network infrastructure.
• Scalability limitations: Scaling a wired network might involve laying
additional cables, which can be disruptive and impractical in certain
situations.
• Aesthetics: Cables can be messy and unappealing, impacting the overall
look and feel of a workspace or living area.

Ultimately, the best choice between WLAN and wired LAN depends on your
specific needs and priorities. Consider factors like:

• Required mobility and flexibility: If your devices need to move freely,


WLAN offers clear advantages.
• Performance requirements: For high-bandwidth applications, wired
connections provide superior performance.
• Security considerations: Prioritize wired connections for sensitive data if
security is paramount.
• Budget and feasibility: Consider the cost and complexity of installation and
maintenance for each option.
• Aesthetics and space limitations: Decide if cables would be inconvenient
or visually unappealing.
22

Q14) WHAT ARE ADVANTAGES OF WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK


OVER WIRED SENSOR NETWORK HENCE EXPLAIN IN BRIEF FIXED
WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK WITH SUITABLE ARCHITECTURE?

Advantages of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) over Wired Sensor


Networks (WSNs):

Mobility and Flexibility:

• No need for physical cables, enabling deployment in difficult-to-reach areas,


adapting to dynamic environments, and facilitating easy reconfiguration.
• Ideal for remote monitoring, disaster response, and temporary deployments.

Reduced Installation and Maintenance Costs:

• No trenching or infrastructure installation required, significantly reducing


costs and installation time.
• Easier to expand and maintain, especially in large or inaccessible areas.

Scalability and Adaptability:

• Easy to add or remove sensors without disrupting existing infrastructure.


• Adaptable to changing network requirements and environmental conditions.

Increased Coverage and Reach:

• Can cover larger areas compared to wired networks, reaching remote or


hazardous locations.
• Enables monitoring of areas where cabling is impractical or impossible.

Energy Efficiency:

• Many WSN nodes utilize low-power technologies and sleep modes,


extending battery life and reducing maintenance needs.

Security:
23

• Can offer inherent security by utilizing encryption and secure


communication protocols.

However, WSNs also have drawbacks:

• Limited range and potential for signal interference.


• Lower data transfer rates compared to wired networks.
• Higher complexity in network management and security considerations.

Fixed Wireless Sensor Network Architecture:

Fixed WSNs offer a hybrid approach between traditional WSNs and wired
networks. They utilize wireless communication between sensor nodes but connect
to a central gateway or access point via fixed infrastructure like cables or dedicated
wireless links.

Possible Architecture:

• Sensor Nodes: These nodes gather data and transmit it wirelessly to nearby
relay nodes.
• Relay Nodes: These nodes amplify and forward the data received from
sensor nodes towards the central gateway.
• Central Gateway: This gateway connects to the backhaul network and
processes the collected data.

Benefits of Fixed WSNs:

• Increased range and reliability compared to pure WSNs, due to the fixed
infrastructure support.
• Higher data transfer rates and reduced interference compared to pure WSNs.
• More efficient power management by utilizing fixed nodes for data
forwarding.
• Easier network management and security control than pure WSNs.

Challenges of Fixed WSNs:

• Higher initial deployment cost due to the need for fixed infrastructure.
• Reduced flexibility compared to pure WSNs as adding nodes requires
installing additional cables or links.
• Less suitable for dynamic environments where flexibility is crucial.
24

Choosing between a fixed WSN and a pure WSN depends on your specific needs
and priorities. Consider factors like:

• Network coverage requirements: Choose fixed WSNs for larger areas.


• Data transmission requirements: Fixed WSNs offer higher data rates for
bandwidth-intensive applications.
• Cost and deployment feasibility: Fixed WSNs have higher initial costs but
might be more cost-effective in the long run.
• Flexibility and adaptability: Pure WSNs are more flexible but may have
limited range and reliability.

By carefully analyzing your needs and constraints, you can choose the optimal
WSN architecture to achieve efficient and reliable data collection and monitoring
for your specific application.

I hope this explanation provides a clear understanding of the advantages of WSNs


over WSNs and the potential of fixed WSN architecture. Feel free to ask if you
have any further questions or need more detailed information.

Q15) WHAT IS SOURCE INITIATED NON DEMAND ROUTING ?


EXPLAIN DYNAMIC SOURCE ROUTING IN DETAIL?

The terms "source-initiated non-demand routing" and "dynamic source routing" are
related but not identical. Here's a breakdown to clarify their differences:

Source-initiated non-demand routing:

• This refers to a general concept where routes are established only when a
source node needs to send data to a specific destination. It contrasts with
proactive routing approaches where all nodes maintain pre-existing paths to
all potential destinations, even if those paths are never used.
• Examples: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad hoc On-Demand Distance
Vector Routing (AODV), Temporarily Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA)
• Benefits: Reduced routing overhead, improved scalability in large networks,
faster adaptation to network changes.
• Drawbacks: Slightly higher initial delay when establishing a new route,
increased processing on source nodes.
25

Dynamic source routing:

• This is a specific protocol within the source-initiated non-demand


routing category where the source node not only initiates route discovery
but also includes the complete path to the destination in the data
packets. This allows intermediate nodes to forward packets without needing
routing tables or path computations.
• Example: Dynamic Source Routing (DSR)
• Benefits: Loop-free routing, efficient data forwarding, reduces processing
load on intermediate nodes.
• Drawbacks: Increased packet size due to route inclusion, potential
scalability issues, security concerns as attackers can manipulate routes.

Essentially, all Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) is source-initiated and non-


demand, but not all source-initiated non-demand routing protocols are
dynamic source routing. Other protocols like AODV only discover routes but
don't include them in data packets.

Here's a deeper dive into Dynamic Source Routing (DSR):

Operation:

1. Route Request (RREQ): When a source node needs a route to a


destination, it broadcasts an RREQ message containing its address, the
destination address, and a unique sequence number.
2. Route Reply (RREP): Intermediate nodes receiving the RREQ update their
routing caches and reply with an RREP if they know a route to the
destination or are the destination itself. The RREP carries the same sequence
number and the complete path back to the source.
3. Route establishment: The source chooses the RREP with the desired path
characteristics (shortest hop count, etc.) and caches the route for future use.
4. Data forwarding: Data packets include the complete path in the header,
allowing intermediate nodes to forward them directly to the next hop based
on the route information.
5. Route maintenance: Nodes monitor for link failures and send Route Error
(RERR) messages to inform other nodes about broken paths. This triggers
updates in routing caches and rerouting if necessary.

DSR's key features:


26

• Loop-free routing: Sequence numbers and route caches prevent routing


loops.
• Efficient data forwarding: Intermediate nodes don't need routing table
lookups due to the included path information.
• Dynamic route adaptation: Routes are updated or re-established as needed
based on network changes.
• Scalability: Efficient in large networks as routing overhead is concentrated
on source nodes.

However, DSR also has limitations:

• Increased packet size: Including the route information increases packet size
and network overhead.
• Scalability limitations: Large networks with numerous route updates can
overwhelm source nodes.
• Security concerns: Malicious nodes can potentially exploit or manipulate
routes included in data packets.

DSR remains a valuable protocol for ad hoc networks and specific


applications where its benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Carefully consider its
features and limitations alongside alternative routing protocols to determine
the best solution for your specific network needs.

I hope this explanation clarifies the distinction between source-initiated non-


demand routing and dynamic source routing, with a detailed focus on DSR. Feel
free to ask if you have any further questions about specific aspects of these
protocols or routing concepts in general!

16) EXPLAIN BRIEF DSR ON DEPEND ROUTING PROTOCOL?

There seems to be a typo in your question. "DSR on depend routing protocol"


doesn't make complete sense. Could you please rephrase your question or provide
more context to what you're seeking clarification on? This will help me provide a
more accurate and relevant explanation.

For example, you could rephrase it as:


27

• "How does DSR depend on other routing protocols?"


• "What is the relationship between DSR and another specific routing protocol
(e.g., AODV)?"
• "Explain the dependability aspects of DSR routing protocol."

Q17) WHAT ARE IMPORTANT FEATURES OF ASSOCIATIVITY BASED


ROUTING USED IN MANET?

Associativity-based routing (ABR) is a dynamic routing protocol specifically


designed for Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs). It prioritizes stability and
efficiency in constantly changing network environments. Here are some key
features of ABR:

1. Associativity:

• This core concept focuses on establishing and maintaining routes based on


spatio-temporal association between nodes. Nodes with consistent spatial
proximity, temporal connection, and signal stability are considered
"associative," indicating a predictable and reliable connection.
• ABR prioritizes selecting and maintaining routes through associative nodes,
aiming for long-lived paths that are less susceptible to link breaks and
network changes.

2. On-demand Route Discovery:

• ABR is a source-initiated on-demand protocol. Routes are only established


when a source node needs to send data to a specific destination. This reduces
routing overhead compared to proactive protocols that constantly maintain
all known routes.
• When a route is required, the source broadcasts a Route ReQuest (RREQ)
message. Intermediate nodes reply with Route ReplY (RREP) messages if
they are the destination or have an associative path to it.

3. Localized Route Repair:


28

• ABR focuses on localized route repair when encountering a link break.


Instead of notifying the entire network, only upstream nodes near the break
trigger a localized broadcast RREQ, searching for an alternative associative
path within a limited scope.
• This minimizes flooding and reduces network overhead compared to
protocols that re-initiate complete route discovery for every break.

4. Route Maintenance:

• ABR employs mechanisms like periodic hello messages and neighbor


verification to monitor the health of established routes.
• If a node detects a change in associativity with its neighbors, it triggers route
repair or updates its routing table as needed.

5. Security Considerations:

• ABR incorporates security measures like authentication and digital


signatures to prevent route spoofing and tampering.
• This is crucial in MANETs due to their inherent vulnerability to malicious
attacks.

Benefits of ABR:

• Improved route stability: Focuses on long-lived and reliable paths through


associative nodes.
• Reduced overhead: On-demand routing and localized repair minimize
flooding and resource consumption.
• Scalability: Efficiently operates in large and dynamic MANETs.
• Adaptability: Responds quickly to network changes and link failures.

Drawbacks of ABR:

• Higher initial delay: Route discovery can be slower than in proactive


protocols.
• Increased processing on source nodes: Source nodes handle route
discovery and maintenance tasks.
• Complex implementation: Requires sophisticated algorithms and
mechanisms compared to simpler protocols.

Overall, ABR offers a unique approach to routing in MANETs, prioritizing


stability and efficiency by leveraging spatio-temporal association between
29

nodes. Its focus on on-demand routing, localized repair, and security makes it
a viable option for applications requiring reliable and adaptive
communication in dynamic network environments.

I hope this explanation provides a clear understanding of the important features of


associativity-based routing. Feel free to ask if you have any further questions!

Q18)WHAT IS ROUTING IN MANET ?DESCRIBE ITS GOAL

Routing in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) plays a crucial role in


establishing and maintaining communication paths between devices in these
dynamic and infrastructure-less networks. Unlike traditional networks with fixed
base stations, MANET nodes act as both routers and data senders/receivers,
constantly changing their positions and connections. This dynamism creates unique
challenges for routing protocols, making it a complex and fascinating area of
network research.

Here's an explanation of routing in MANETs, covering its definition and


goals:

Definition:

• Routing in MANETs refers to the process of dynamically selecting and


maintaining paths for data packets to travel between nodes in the network.
These paths are built and adjusted on-the-fly as nodes move around and
network topology changes.
• Routing protocols are algorithms that govern how nodes discover, advertise,
and update information about potential paths to other nodes. These protocols
must be adapted to the unique characteristics of MANETs, such as limited
resources, frequent topology changes, and variable link quality.

Goals of Routing in MANETs:

• Connectivity: The primary goal is to ensure reliable and efficient


communication between any two nodes in the network, regardless of their
current location or movement.
30

• Efficiency: Routing protocols must minimize resource consumption like


battery power and bandwidth by optimizing path selection and minimizing
unnecessary data transmissions.
• Scalability: Protocols should be able to adapt and function effectively as the
network size and number of nodes increase.
• Adaptability: MANETs are highly dynamic, so routing protocols need to
respond quickly to changes in the network topology, such as node movement
or link failures.
• Security: Malicious attacks are a potential threat in MANETs, so routing
protocols should incorporate security measures to prevent route spoofing,
data interception, and other security breaches.

Challenges of Routing in MANETs:

• Dynamic topology: Constant movement of nodes leads to frequent changes


in network connections, making it difficult to maintain stable routes.
• Limited resources: Nodes have limited battery power and processing
capabilities, requiring efficient protocols that minimize resource
consumption.
• Hidden terminal and exposed terminal problems: These problems can
occur due to nodes moving in and out of each other's transmission range,
causing data loss or collisions.
• Scalability concerns: As the network size grows, routing protocols need to
efficiently manage routing information and maintain connectivity.

Routing protocols for MANETs address these challenges through various


techniques and algorithms. Some popular examples include:

• DSR (Dynamic Source Routing): Source-initiated, on-demand protocol


where nodes include the complete path in data packets.
• AODV (Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing): Efficiently
discovers routes based on hop count and updates routing tables dynamically.
• TORA (Temporarily Ordered Routing Algorithm): Uses a proactive
approach to maintain loop-free routes with low routing overhead.
31

Q19)EXPLAIN SOURCE INITIATED ON DEMAND ROUTING IN


DETAIL?

Source-initiated on-demand routing is a fundamental approach used in various


routing protocols within Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) and other dynamic
network environments. Here's a detailed explanation of its key concepts and
workings:

Concept:

• Unlike proactive routing where all nodes constantly maintain pre-existing


paths to every other node, source-initiated on-demand routing focuses on
establishing routes only when a source node needs to send data to a
specific destination. This reduces routing overhead and adapts to network
changes efficiently.
• The network only builds paths as and when required, minimizing
unnecessary traffic and resource consumption compared to proactively
maintaining all potential routes.

Operation:

1. Route Discovery: When a source node wants to send data to a destination it


doesn't have a route for, it initiates a route discovery process. This typically
involves broadcasting a special message (e.g., Route Request or RREQ)
containing the source's address, destination's address, and potentially other
information like sequence numbers or hop count.
2. Route Propagation: Intermediate nodes receiving the RREQ update their
routing tables and forward the message based on the specific protocol's
mechanism. Some protocols rely on flooding, while others employ more
targeted approaches like source routing or zone-based routing.
3. Route Reply: Nodes that know a route to the destination or are the
destination itself send a reply message (e.g., Route Reply or RREP) back to
the source. This RREP carries information about the path back to the source,
potentially including hop count, node addresses, or other specifics based on
the protocol.
4. Route Selection: The source node receives multiple RREPs from different
potential routes and chooses the one that best meets its criteria. This could
be based on factors like shortest hop count, delay, energy efficiency, or
security considerations.
32

5. Data Forwarding: Once the source selects a route, it starts sending data
packets to the destination along the chosen path. Intermediate nodes forward
these packets based on the routing information contained within the packets
or their routing tables.
6. Route Maintenance: Nodes monitor the network for link failures or
changes in path quality. When a problem is detected, they send error
messages (e.g., Route Error or RERR) to inform other nodes and trigger
updates in routing tables. This allows the source to re-initiate route
discovery if necessary and maintain connectivity with the destination.

Benefits of Source-Initiated On-Demand Routing:

• Reduced routing overhead: Only active routes are maintained, minimizing


unnecessary traffic and resource consumption.
• Scalability: Efficiently handles large and dynamic networks as routing
overhead is concentrated on source nodes seeking specific paths.
• Faster adaptation to network changes: Routes are quickly updated or re-
established when the network topology changes, providing better
responsiveness.
• Reduced risk of routing loops: On-demand discovery and dynamic updates
minimize the chance of loops compared to static routing tables.

Drawbacks of Source-Initiated On-Demand Routing:

• Higher initial delay: Setting up a new route can be slower than in proactive
protocols as it requires route discovery before data transmission.
• Increased processing on source nodes: Source nodes perform route
discovery and maintenance tasks, potentially impacting their energy
consumption.
• Increased complexity: Designing and implementing efficient on-demand
protocols can be more complex compared to simple proactive approaches.

Examples of Source-Initiated On-Demand Routing Protocols:

• Dynamic Source Routing (DSR): Source includes the complete path in


data packets, eliminating routing table lookups at intermediate nodes.
• Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV): Utilizes hop
count information to discover and maintain efficient routes.
• Temporarily Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA): Employs a proactive
approach to maintain loop-free routes with minimal overhead.
33

Q20) EXPLAIN ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES OF WIRELESS


SENSOR NETWORKS OVER WIRED SENSOR NETWORK?

Advantages of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) over Wired Sensor


Networks (WSNs):

Mobility and flexibility:

• No need for physical cables, enabling deployment in difficult-to-reach areas,


adapting to dynamic environments, and facilitating easy reconfiguration.
• Ideal for remote monitoring, disaster response, and temporary deployments.

Reduced installation and maintenance costs:

• No trenching or infrastructure installation required, significantly reducing


costs and installation time.
• Easier to expand and maintain, especially in large or inaccessible areas.

Scalability and adaptability:

• Easy to add or remove sensors without disrupting existing infrastructure.


• Adaptable to changing network requirements and environmental conditions.

Increased coverage and reach:

• Can cover larger areas compared to wired networks, reaching remote or


hazardous locations.
• Enables monitoring of areas where cabling is impractical or impossible.

Energy efficiency:

• Many WSN nodes utilize low-power technologies and sleep modes,


extending battery life and reducing maintenance needs.

Disadvantages of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) over Wired Sensor


Networks (WSNs):
34

Limited range and potential for signal interference:

• Range can be limited by obstacles, distance from base stations, and


interference from other devices.
• Signal quality can be affected by environmental factors like humidity and
temperature.

Lower data transfer rates:

• Typically offer lower data transfer rates compared to wired networks,


limiting their suitability for bandwidth-intensive applications.

Higher complexity in network management and security considerations:

• Managing a wireless network can be more complex than a wired one,


requiring specialized protocols and tools.
• Security can be a concern as wireless signals are more susceptible to
eavesdropping and hacking.

Overall, the choice between WSNs and WSNs depends on your specific needs
and priorities. Consider factors like:

• Coverage area: Choose WSNs for larger areas or difficult-to-reach


locations.
• Data transfer requirements: WSNs may not be suitable for bandwidth-
intensive applications.
• Cost and deployment feasibility: WSNs have lower installation costs but
might require more complex management.
• Mobility and flexibility: WSNs offer greater flexibility and adaptability to
changing environments.
• Security considerations: WSNs require careful security measures to protect
against potential threats.

By carefully weighing these factors, you can choose the optimal sensor network
solution that best meets your specific requirements and ensures efficient and
reliable data collection and monitoring for your application.

I hope this explanation helps you make an informed decision! Feel free to ask if
you have any further questions or need more specific information.
35

Q21) EXPLAIN ANY TWO ROUTE OPTIMIZATION STRTAGIES ?

Here are two common route optimization strategies you can consider:

1. Load Balancing:

• Concept: This strategy aims to distribute the traffic load evenly across
available routes. By avoiding overload on any single path, you can:
o Reduce congestion and delays.
o Improve overall network performance and responsiveness.
o Extend the lifespan of network infrastructure by preventing undue
stress on specific routes.
• Implementation: Various techniques can be used for load balancing:
o Dynamic routing: Algorithms can analyze traffic patterns and
network conditions to automatically choose the least congested routes
for data transmission.
o Static routing: Pre-defined rules can be established to distribute
traffic across different paths based on factors like capacity, latency, or
reliability.
o Multipath routing: Utilize multiple paths simultaneously to
distribute the load, enhancing redundancy and fault tolerance.
• Benefits: Improved performance, reduced congestion, longer equipment
lifespan.
• Drawbacks: Increased complexity of implementation and management,
potential overhead associated with dynamic routing decisions.

2. Zone-Based Routing:

• Concept: This strategy divides the network into smaller geographical zones
and optimizes routing within each zone. Data packets are prioritized to stay
within their zone as much as possible, minimizing unnecessary hops and
reducing traffic over long distances.
• Implementation: Zone borders can be defined based on various factors like
physical boundaries, traffic density, or device types. Within each zone,
specific routing algorithms can be employed:
o Shortest path routing: Prioritize the shortest path within the zone to
minimize delay.
36

oCluster-based routing: Group devices into clusters and optimize


routing between cluster heads, reducing overall data movement.
o Zone aggregation: Aggregate data within zones before sending it to
the wider network, reducing traffic volume transmitted on backbone
links.
• Benefits: Reduced traffic burden on core network, improved local
responsiveness, optimized resource utilization within zones.
• Drawbacks: Increased complexity of managing zone boundaries and
routing rules, potential for bottlenecks at zone borders if not properly
configured.

Q22) EXPLAIN CLUSTER BASED ROUTING PROTOCOL IN WSN


SYSTEM?

Cluster-based routing protocols represent a popular approach for managing


data transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). They rely on dividing
the network into smaller groups called clusters, each with a designated
"cluster head" responsible for collecting data from other members and
relaying it to the base station.

Here's an explanation of the key concepts and benefits of cluster-based routing


protocols in WSNs:

Concept:

• The network is divided into clusters, with each cluster containing a cluster
head and multiple member nodes.
• Cluster heads aggregate data from member nodes within their cluster and
transmit it to the base station either directly or through other cluster heads in
a hierarchical structure.
• This reduces the number of transmissions within the entire network, saving
energy and extending the overall lifetime of the WSN.

Benefits:
37

• Energy efficiency: By minimizing data hops and aggregating data before


transmission, cluster-based routing reduces energy consumption on
individual nodes, leading to a longer network lifetime.
• Scalability: This approach efficiently manages large networks due to the
localized data aggregation and reduced traffic on the backbone network.
• Improved network lifetime: Reduced energy consumption on individual
nodes extends the overall network lifetime.
• Fault tolerance: If a cluster head fails, another node within the cluster can
potentially take over, enhancing network resiliency.
• Data aggregation: Allows for preliminary data processing and filtering at
the cluster head level, reducing the amount of raw data transmitted to the
base station.

Examples of Cluster-based Routing Protocols:

• LEACH (Low-Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy): A popular


protocol that randomly selects cluster heads based on a predetermined
probability.
• HEED (Hybrid Energy-Efficient Distributed Clustering): Considers
remaining energy as a factor when electing cluster heads, aiming for a more
balanced energy distribution.
• PEGASIS (Power-Efficient Gathering for Sensor Information Systems):
Utilizes a chain-based approach where nodes take turns forwarding data
towards the base station, minimizing the number of transmissions.

Challenges of Cluster-based Routing Protocols:

• Cluster head selection: Choosing efficient and energy-balanced cluster


heads is crucial for optimal performance.
• Scalability limitations: Managing very large networks with numerous
clusters can become complex.
• Security concerns: Cluster heads become central points of vulnerability,
requiring proper security measures.

Overall, cluster-based routing protocols offer a valuable approach for


optimizing data transmission and extending network lifetime in WSNs. Their
benefits in terms of energy efficiency, scalability, and fault tolerance make
them a popular choice for various WSN applications. However, careful
consideration of challenges like cluster head selection and security is essential
for successful implementation.!
38

Q23) EXPLAIN 1) DSR PROTOCOL 2) FIXED WIRELESS SENSOR


NETWORK

1) DSR Protocol (Dynamic Source Routing):

DSR (Dynamic Source Routing) is a reactive source-initiated routing protocol


designed for mobile ad-hoc networks (MANETs). It prioritizes source-driven route
discovery and on-demand path establishment, making it efficient for dynamic
network environments. Here's a breakdown of its key features:

Operation:

1. Route Discovery: When a source node needs to send data to a specific


destination, it broadcasts a "Route Request" (RREQ) message containing its
address, the destination address, and a unique sequence number.
2. Route Reply: Intermediate nodes receiving the RREQ update their routing
caches and reply with a "Route Reply" (RREP) message if:
o They are the destination.
o They know a route to the destination.
3. Route Selection: The source node chooses the RREP with the desired path
characteristics (shortest hop count, etc.) and caches the route for future use.
4. Data Forwarding: Data packets include the complete path in the header,
allowing intermediate nodes to forward them directly to the next hop based
on the route information.
5. Route Maintenance: Nodes monitor for link failures and send "Route
Error" (RERR) messages to inform other nodes about broken paths. This
triggers updates in routing caches and rerouting if necessary.

Benefits:

• Loop-free routing: Sequence numbers and route caches prevent routing


loops.
• Efficient data forwarding: Intermediate nodes don't need routing table
lookups due to the included path information.
• Dynamic route adaptation: Routes are updated or re-established as needed
based on network changes.
39

• Scalability: Efficient in large networks as routing overhead is concentrated


on source nodes.

Drawbacks:

• Increased packet size: Including the route information increases packet size
and network overhead.
• Scalability limitations: Large networks with numerous route updates can
overwhelm source nodes.
• Security concerns: Malicious nodes can potentially exploit or manipulate
routes included in data packets.

Overall, DSR is a valuable protocol for ad hoc networks and specific


applications where its benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Carefully consider its
features and limitations alongside alternative routing protocols to determine
the best solution for your specific network needs.

2) Fixed Wireless Sensor Network:

A fixed wireless sensor network (FWSN) combines elements of traditional wired


sensor networks (WSNs) and pure wireless sensor networks (WSNs). It utilizes
wireless communication between sensor nodes but connects to a central gateway or
access point via fixed infrastructure like cables or dedicated wireless links.

Key aspects of FWSNs:

• Sensor Nodes: Gather data and transmit it wirelessly to nearby relay nodes.
• Relay Nodes: Amplify and forward the data received from sensor nodes
towards the central gateway.
• Central Gateway: Connects to the backhaul network and processes the
collected data.

Benefits of FWSNs:

• Increased range and reliability compared to pure WSNs, due to the fixed
infrastructure support.
• Higher data transfer rates and reduced interference compared to pure
WSNs.
• More efficient power management by utilizing fixed nodes for data
forwarding.
• Easier network management and security control than pure WSNs.
40

Drawbacks of FWSNs:

• Higher initial deployment cost due to the need for fixed infrastructure.
• Reduced flexibility compared to pure WSNs as adding nodes requires
installing additional cables or links.
• Less suitable for dynamic environments where flexibility is crucial.

Choosing between a FWSN and a pure WSN depends on your specific needs
and priorities. Consider factors like:

• Network coverage requirements: Choose FWSNs for larger areas.


• Data transmission requirements: FWSNs offer higher data rates for
bandwidth-intensive applications.
• Cost and deployment feasibility: FWSNs have higher initial costs but
might be more cost-effective in the long run.
• Flexibility and adaptability: Pure WSNs are more flexible but may have
limited range and reliability.

Q24) WHAT DO YOU UNDERSTAND BY TABLE DRIVEN ROUTING


PROTOCOL ? EXPLAIN IN DETAIL

Table-driven routing protocols, also known as proactive routing protocols,


play a crucial role in maintaining efficient data flow in computer networks.
Here's a detailed explanation of their concept, operation, and key
characteristics:

Concept:

• Each node in the network maintains a routing table containing information


about paths to all other nodes. This table typically includes details like hop
count, destination address, next hop address, and potentially other metrics
like link cost or delay.
• Nodes periodically exchange routing updates with their neighbors, informing
them about the known network topology and potential changes. These
41

updates allow all nodes to consistently maintain up-to-date routing


information.

Operation:

1. Route Maintenance: Nodes constantly update their routing tables based on:
o Periodic broadcasts of their own routing tables (distance-vector
protocols) or specific link-state advertisements (link-state protocols).
o Receiving routing updates from neighboring nodes about changes in
the network topology (link failures, new connections, etc.).
o Local knowledge of directly connected neighbors and their routes.
2. Data Forwarding: When a node needs to send data to a destination, it
consults its routing table to determine the best path based on pre-defined
metrics like hop count, delay, or bandwidth.
3. Loop Prevention: Various mechanisms like routing loops are implemented
to avoid endless data circles within the network. These can involve horizon
splits, age timestamps, or poison reverse updates.

Benefits of Table-driven Routing Protocols:

• Fast route lookup: Data forwarding decisions are quick and efficient as
routes are readily available in the routing table.
• Scalability: Can handle relatively large networks efficiently due to
distributed routing information.
• Loop-free routing: Mechanisms like poison reverse updates and sequence
numbers help prevent routing loops.
• Reliable data delivery: Guaranteed delivery of data packets as long as the
chosen path remains operational.

Drawbacks of Table-driven Routing Protocols:

• High bandwidth consumption: Constant routing updates can result in


significant network traffic overhead.
• Slow reaction to network changes: Changes in the network topology take
time to propagate through routing updates, potentially leading to temporary
route inefficiencies.
• Increased node resource consumption: Maintaining and updating routing
tables requires processing power and memory on each node.
• Security concerns: Malicious actors could potentially exploit routing
updates to disrupt network operation or redirect traffic.
42

Examples of Table-driven Routing Protocols:

• RIP (Routing Information Protocol): Distance-vector protocol using hop


count as the primary metric.
• OSPF (Open Shortest Path First): Link-state protocol calculating the
shortest path based on link costs.
• BGP (Border Gateway Protocol): Responsible for routing between
autonomous systems in the internet.

Choosing the right routing protocol depends on various factors like network
size, topology, traffic patterns, and resource constraints. While table-driven
protocols offer fast data forwarding and reliable delivery, their drawbacks like
overhead and slow reaction might make them less suitable for dynamic networks
or resource-constrained environments.

I hope this detailed explanation provides a clear understanding of table-driven


routing protocols. Please let me know if you have any further questions about
specific aspects of these protocols or need a comparison with other routing
approaches like source-initiated on-demand protocols.

Q25)WHAT ARE SALIENT CHARASTERISTIC OF ADHOC NETWORK


EXPLAIN EACH IN BRIEF?

View other drafts

Ad hoc networks, also known as mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs), possess


several unique characteristics that distinguish them from traditional infrastructure-
based networks. Here are some of the most salient characteristics, explained in
brief:

1. Dynamic Topology: Unlike fixed networks with pre-defined connections, nodes


in ad hoc networks constantly move and change their relative positions. This
creates a dynamic network topology that requires adaptable routing protocols and
network management strategies.
43

2. Decentralized Control: Ad hoc networks lack a central control point like a


router or base station. Each node acts as both a router and a data sender/receiver,
sharing responsibility for maintaining connectivity and managing data flow.

3. Limited Resources: Nodes in ad hoc networks often have limited battery


power, processing capabilities, and communication range. This necessitates
energy-efficient protocols and algorithms to maximize network lifetime and
resource utilization.

4. Multi-hop Communication: Data packets typically travel through multiple


nodes (multi-hop) to reach their destination due to limited transmission range.
Efficient routing protocols and mechanisms are crucial to minimize hop count and
optimize data transmission delay.

5. Security Concerns: Ad hoc networks are inherently vulnerable to various


security threats due to their open nature and dynamic topology. Implementing
robust authentication, encryption, and intrusion detection mechanisms is essential
to protect data and network integrity.

6. Scalability: Ad hoc networks can be large and dynamic, with varying sizes and
network configurations. Routing protocols and management strategies need to
scale efficiently to accommodate different network sizes and changing
environments.

7. Mobility: Nodes in ad hoc networks can move freely, which can lead to link
breakages and disruptions in communication. Protocols and mechanisms are
needed to handle mobility-related challenges like route maintenance and link re-
establishment.

8. Limited Bandwidth: Wireless communication in ad hoc networks typically


offers lower bandwidth compared to wired networks. This necessitates using
efficient data compression techniques and prioritizing high-value data to optimize
bandwidth utilization.

9. Hidden Terminal and Exposed Terminal Problems: These problems occur


due to nodes moving in and out of each other's transmission range, causing
collisions and potential data loss. Protocols and mechanisms are needed to
overcome these challenges and ensure reliable communication.

10. Self-organization and Self-healing: Ad hoc networks need to be able to self-


organize and adapt to changes in the network topology without reliance on external
44

intervention. This requires proactive protocols and mechanisms for fault detection
and recovery

You might also like