Page 1 of 33

SAR Test Report

Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01

FCC ID : 2AOKB-A3945L

APPLICATION PURPOSE : Original Equipment

PRODUCT DESIGNATION : Wireless Headphone

BRAND NAME : Soundcore

MODEL NAME : A3945L

APPLICANT : Anker Innovations Limited

DATE OF ISSUE : Sep. 15,2021

IEEE Std. 1528:2013
FCC 47 CFR Part 2§2.1093:2013
STANDARD(S) :
IEEE Std C95.1 ™-2005
IEC 62209-1: 2016

REPORT VERSION : V1.0

Attestation of Global Compliance(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 2 of 33

Report Revise Record

Report Version Revise Time Issued Date Valid Version Notes

V1.0 / Sep. 15,2021 Valid Initial Release

 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 3 of 33

Test Report Certification

Applicant Name Anker Innovations Limited
Applicant Address Room 1318-19, Hollywood Plaza, 610 Nathan Road, Mongkok, Kowloon, Hongkong
Manufacturer Name Anker Innovations Limited
Manufacturer Address Room 1318-19, Hollywood Plaza, 610 Nathan Road, Mongkok, Kowloon, Hongkong
Factory Name Cosonic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Room 506, No.1 Building, No.6, South Industrial Road, Songshan Lake National
Factory Address High-tech Industrial Development Zone, Dongguan City, Guangdong Province,
P.R.China
Product Designation Wireless Headphone
Brand Name Soundcore
Model Name A3945L
EUT Voltage DC3.85V by battery
IEEE Std. 1528:2013;
FCC 47 CFR Part 2§2.1093:2013;
Applicable Standard
IEEE Std C95.1 ™-2005;
IEC 62209-1: 2016;
Test Date Sep. 14,2021
Report Template AGCRT-US-Bluetooth/SAR (2021-04-20)
Note: The results of testing in this report apply to the product/system which was tested only.

Prepared By
John Zeng (Project Engineer) Sep. 14,2021

Reviewed By
Angela Li (Reviewer) Sep. 15,2021

Approved By
Forrest Lei (Authorized Officer)
Sep. 15,2021
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 4 of 33

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM SAR VALUE ......................................................................................................... 5
2. GENERAL INFORMATION............................................................................................................................... 6
2.1. EUT DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................................... 6
3. SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM........................................................................................................................ 7
3.1. THE SATIMO SYSTEM USED FOR PERFORMING COMPLIANCE TESTS CONSISTS OF FOLLOWING ITEMS .................. 7
3.2. COMOSAR E-FIELD PROBE .......................................................................................................................... 8
3.3. ROBOT.......................................................................................................................................................... 8
3.4. VIDEO POSITIONING SYSTEM .......................................................................................................................... 9
3.5. DEVICE HOLDER ............................................................................................................................................ 9
3.6. SAM TWIN PHANTOM................................................................................................................................... 10
4. SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE.............................................................................................................. 11
4.1. SPECIFIC ABSORPTION RATE (SAR) .............................................................................................................. 11
4.2. SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE ................................................................................................................ 12
4.3. RF EXPOSURE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 14
5. TISSUE SIMULATING LIQUID ......................................................................................................................... 15
5.1. THE COMPOSITION OF THE TISSUE SIMULATING LIQUID..................................................................................... 15
5.2. TISSUE DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS FOR HEAD AND BODY PHANTOMS ............................................................... 15
5.3. TISSUE CALIBRATION RESULT ....................................................................................................................... 16
6. SAR SYSTEM CHECK PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................... 17
6.1. SAR SYSTEM CHECK PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................. 17
6.2. SAR SYSTEM CHECK ................................................................................................................................... 18
7. EUT TEST POSITION ..................................................................................................................................... 19
7.1. TEST POSITION ............................................................................................................................................ 19
8. SAR EXPOSURE LIMITS ............................................................................................................................... 20
9. TEST FACILITY .............................................................................................................................................. 21
10. TEST EQUIPMENT LIST .............................................................................................................................. 22
11. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ................................................................................................................ 23
12. CONDUCTED POWER MEASUREMENT..................................................................................................... 26
13. TEST RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................... 27
13.1. SAR TEST RESULTS SUMMARY................................................................................................................... 27
APPENDIX A. SAR SYSTEM CHECK DATA ..................................................................................................... 29
APPENDIX B. SAR MEASUREMENT DATA ...................................................................................................... 31
APPENDIX C. TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS.................................................................................................. 33
APPENDIX D. CALIBRATION DATA ................................................................................................................. 33
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 5 of 33

1. SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM SAR VALUE

The maximum results of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) found during testing for EUT are as follows:
SAR Test
Frequency Band Highest Reported 1g-SAR(W/kg)
Result
Bluetooth 0.329
PASS
SAR Test Limit (W/kg) 1.6
This device is compliance with Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for general population/uncontrolled exposure
limits (1.6W/kg) specified in IEEE Std. 1528:2013; FCC 47CFR § 2.1093; IEEE/ANSI C95.1:2005 and the
following specific FCC Test Procedures:
·KDB 447498 D01 General RF Exposure Guidance v06
·KDB 865664 D01 SAR Measurement 100MHz to 6GHz v01r04
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 6 of 33

2. GENERAL INFORMATION

2.1. EUT Description

General Information
Product Designation Wireless Headphone
Test Model A3945L
Hardware Version V1.5
Software Version V1.82
Duty cycle 57.79% (test mode)
Device Category Portable
RF Exposure Environment Uncontrolled
Antenna Type Internal
Bluetooth

Operation Frequency 2402~2480MHz

Antenna Gain -2.17dBi

Bluetooth Version V5.2

Type of modulation BR/EDR :GFSK, π /4-DQPSK, 8-DPSK; BLE :GFSK

Peak Output Power BR/EDR : 11.137dBm; BLE : 4.154dBm

Power Supply DC 3.85V by battery

Note: 1.The sample used for testing is end product.
2. The test sample has no any deviation to the test method of standard mentioned in page 1.
3.Duty-cycle = [on time/total time] x 100%
Type
Product
Production unit Identical Prototype
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 7 of 33

3. SAR MEASUREMENT SYSTEM

3.1. The SATIMO system used for performing compliance tests consists of following items

The COMOSAR system for performing compliance tests consists of the following items:
· The PC. It controls most of the bench devices and stores measurement data.A computer running WinXP and
the Opensar software.
· The E-Field probe. The probe is a 3-axis system made of 3 distinct dipoles. Each dipole returns a voltage in
function of the ambient electric field.
· The Keithley multimeter measures each probe dipole voltages.
· The SAM phantom simulates a human head. The measurement of the electric field is made inside the
phantom.
· The liquids simulate the dielectric properties of the human head tissues.
· The network emulator controls the mobile phone under test.
· The validation dipoles are used to measure a reference SAR. They are used to periodically check the bench to
make sure that there is no drift of the system characteristics over time.
·The phantom, the device holder and other accessories according to the targeted measurement.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 8 of 33

3.2. COMOSAR E-Field Probe

The SAR measurement is conducted with the dosimetric probe manufactured by SATIMO. The probe is specially
designed and calibrated for use in liquid with high permittivity. The dosimetric probe has special calibration in liquid
at different frequency. SATIMO conducts the probe calibration in compliance with international and national
standards (e.g. IEEE 1528 and relevant KDB files.) The calibration data are in Appendix D.

Isotropic E-Field Probe Specification

Model SSE5
Manufacture MVG
Identification No. SN 03/18 EP327
0.15GHz-3GHz
Frequency
Linearity:±0.08dB(150MHz-3GHz)
0.01W/kg-100W/kg
Dynamic Range
Linearity:±0.08dB
Overall length:330mm
Length of individual dipoles:4.5mm
Maximum external diameter:8mm
Dimensions Probe Tip external diameter:5mm
Distance between dipoles/ probe
extremity:2.7mm

High precision dosimetric measurements in any exposure scenario

(e.g., very strong gradient fields). Only probe which enables
Application
compliance testing for frequencies up to 3 GHz with precision of better
30%.

3.3. Robot

The COMOSAR system uses the KUKA robot from SATIMO SA

(France).For the 6-axis controller COMOSAR system, the KUKA
robot controller version from SATIMO is used.
The XL robot series have many features that are important for
our application:
� High precision (repeatability 0.02 mm)
� High reliability (industrial design)
� Jerk-free straight movements
� Low ELF interference (the closed metallic
construction shields against motor control fields)
� 6-axis controller
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 9 of 33

3.4. Video Positioning System

The video positioning system is used in OpenSAR to check the

probe. Which is composed of a camera, LED, mirror and mechanical
parts.The camera is piloted by the main computer with firewire link.
During the process, the actual position of the probe tip with respect to
the robot arm is measured, as well as the probe length and the
horizontal probe offset. The software then corrects all movements,
such that the robot coordinates are valid for the probe tip.
The repeatability of this process is better than 0.1 mm. If a position
has been taught with an aligned probe, the same position will be
reached with another aligned probe within 0.1 mm, even if the other
probe has different dimensions. During probe rotations, the probe tip
will keep its actual position.

3.5. Device Holder

The COMOSAR device holder is designed to cope with different

positions given in the standard. It has two scales for the device
rotation (with respect to the body axis) and the device inclination (with
respect to the line between the ear reference points). The rotation
center for both scales is the ear reference point (EPR).
Thus the device needs no repositioning when changing the angles.
The COMOSAR device holder has been made out of low-loss POM
material having the following dielectric parameters: relative
permittivity
εr =3 and loss tangent δ = 0.02. The amount of dielectric material has
been reduced in the closest vicinity of the device, since
measurements have suggested that the influence of the clamp on the
test results could thus be lowered.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 10 of 33

3.6. SAM Twin Phantom

The SAM twin phantom is a fiberglass shell phantom with

2mm shell thickness (except the ear region where shell
thickness increases to 6mm). It has three measurement
areas:
� Left head
� Right head
� Flat phantom

The bottom plate contains three pair of bolts for locking the device holder. The device holder positions are
adjusted to the standard measurement positions in the three sections. A white cover is provided to tap the
phantom during off-periods to prevent water evaporation and changes in the liquid parameters. On the
phantom top, three reference markers are provided to identify the phantom position with respect to the robot.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 11 of 33

4. SAR MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE

4.1. Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)

SAR is related to the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass in object exposed to a radio field. The SAR
distribution in a biological body is complicated and is usually carried out by experimental techniques or numerical
modeling. The standard recommends limits for two tiers of groups, occupational/controlled and
occupational/uncontrolled, based on a person’s awareness and ability to exercise control over his or her exposure.
In general, occupational/controlled exposure limits are higher than the limits for general population/uncontrolled.
The SAR definition is the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dW) absorbed by (dissipated in) an
incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element(dv) of given mass density (ρ). The equation description is
as below:

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per kilogram (W/kg)

SAR can be obtained using either of the following equations:

Where
SAR is the specific absorption rate in watts per kilogram;
E is the r.m.s. value of the electric field strength in the tissue in volts per meter;
σ is the conductivity of the tissue in siemens per metre;
ρ is the density of the tissue in kilograms per cubic metre;
ch is the heat capacity of the tissue in joules per kilogram and Kelvin;

dT
dt
│t = 0 is the initial time derivative of temperature in the tissue in kelvins per second
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 12 of 33

4.2. SAR Measurement Procedure

Step 1: Power Reference Measurement
The Power Reference Measurement and Power Drift Measurement are for monitoring the power drift of the
device under test in the batch process. The minimum distance of probe sensors to surface is 2.7mm This
distance cannot be smaller than the distance os sensor calibration points to probe tip as `defined in the probe
properties,
Step 2: Area Scan
The Area Scan is used as a fast scan in two dimensions to find the area of high field values, before doing a fine
measurement around the hot spot. The sophisticated interpolation routines implemented in SATIMO software
can find the maximum locations even in relatively coarse grids. When an Area Scan has measured all
reachable points, it computes the field maximal found in the scanned area, within a range of the global
maximum. The range (in db) is specified in the standards for compliance testing. For example, a 2db range is
required in IEEE Standard 1528, whereby 3db is a requirement when compliance is assessed in accordance
with the ARIB standard (Japan) If one Zoom Scan follows the Area Scan, then only the absolute maximum will
be taken as reference. For cases where multiple maximum are detected, the number of Zoom Scan has to be
increased accordingly.
Area Scan Parameters extracted from KDB 865664 D01 SAR Measurement 100MHz to 6GHz

Step 3: Zoom Scan

Zoom Scan are used to assess the peak spatial SAR value within a cubic average volume containing 1g abd
10g of simulated tissue. The Zoom Scan measures points(refer to table below) within a cube whose base faces
are centered on the maxima found in a preceding area scan job within the same procedure. When the
measurement is done, the Zoom Scan evaluates the averaged SAR for 1g and 10g and displays these values
next to the job’s label.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 13 of 33

Zoom Scan Parameters extracted from KDB865664 d01 SAR Measurement 100MHz to 6GHz

Step 4: Power Drift Measurement

The Power Drift Measurement measures the field at the same location as the most recent power reference
measurement within the same procedure, and with the same settings. The Power Drift Measurement gives the
field difference in dB from the reading conducted within the same settings. This allows a user to monitor the
power drift of the device under test within a batch process. The measurement procedure is the same as Step 1.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 14 of 33

4.3. RF Exposure Conditions

Test Configuration and setting:
The device is a portable TWS bluetooth ear bud, and supports Bluetooth wireless technology.
For SAR testing, the device was controlled by software to test at reference fixed frequency points.

Antenna Location:

Antenna
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 15 of 33

5. TISSUE SIMULATING LIQUID

For SAR measurement of the field distribution inside the phantom, the phantom must be filled with
homogeneous tissue simulating liquid to a depth of at least 15cm. For head SAR testing the liquid height from
the ear reference point (ERP) of the phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15cm For body SAR testing,
the liquid height from the center of the flat phantom to the liquid top surface is larger than 15cm.The nominal
dielectric values of the tissue simulating liquids in the phantom and the tolerance of 10% are listed in 6.2

5.1. The composition of the tissue simulating liquid

Ingredient
(% Weight) 1,2 Triton
Frequency Water Nacl Polysorbate 20 DGBE
Propanediol X-100
(MHz)
2450 Head 71.88 0.16 0.0 7.99 0.0 19.97

5.2. Tissue Dielectric Parameters for Head and Body Phantoms

The head and body tissue dielectric parameters recommended by the IEC 62209-1 have been incorporated in
the following table.
Target Frequency head body
(MHz) εr σ (S/m) εr σ (S/m)
300 45.3 0.87 45.3 0.87
450 43.5 0.87 43.5 0.87
835 41.5 0.90 41.5 0.90
900 41.5 0.97 41.5 0.97
915 41.5 1.01 41.5 1.01
1450 40.5 1.20 40.5 1.20
1610 40.3 1.29 40.3 1.29
1800 – 2000 40.0 1.40 40.0 1.40
2450 39.2 1.80 39.2 1.80
3000 38.5 2.40 38.5 2.40
(εr = relative permittivity, σ = conductivity and ρ = 1000 kg/m3)
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 16 of 33

5.3. Tissue Calibration Result

The dielectric parameters of the liquids were verified prior to the SAR evaluation using SATIMO
Dielectric Probe Kit and R&S Network Analyzer ZVL6.

Tissue Stimulant Measurement for 2450MHz

Dielectric Parameters (±10%) Tissue
Fr.
Temp Test time
(MHz) εr39.2(35.28-43.12) δ[s/m]1.80(1.62-1.98)
Head [oC]
2441 39.72 1.81
20.5 Sep. 14,2021
2450 38.65 1.83
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 17 of 33

6. SAR SYSTEM CHECK PROCEDURE

6.1. SAR System Check Procedures

SAR system check is required to confirm measurement accuracy, according to the tissue dielectric media,
probe calibration points and other system operating parameters required for measuring the SAR of a test
device. The system verification must be performed for each frequency band and within the valid range of each
probe calibration point required for testing the device. The same SAR probe(s) and tissue-equivalent media
combinations used with each specific SAR system for system verification must be used for device testing.
When multiple probe calibration points are required to cover substantially large transmission bands,
independent system verifications are required for each probe calibration point. A system verification must be
performed before each series of SAR measurements using the same probe calibration point and
tissue-equivalent medium. Additional system verification should be considered according to the conditions of
the tissue-equivalent medium and measured tissue dielectric parameters, typically every three to four days
when the liquid parameters are remeasured or sooner when marginal liquid parameters are used at the
beginning of a series of measurements.
Each SATIMO system is equipped with one or more system check kits. These units, together with the
predefined measurement procedures within the SATIMO software, enable the user to conduct the system
check and system validation. System kit includes a dipole, and dipole device holder.
The system check verifies that the system operates within its specifications. It’s performed daily or before every
SAR measurement. The system check uses normal SAR measurement in the flat section of the phantom with a
matched dipole at a specified distance. The system check setup is shown as below.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 18 of 33

6.2. SAR System Check

6.2.1. Dipoles

The dipoles used is based on the IEEE-1528 standard, and is

complied with mechanical and electrical specifications in line
with the requirements of IEEE. the table below provides details
for the mechanical and electrical
Specifications for the dipoles.

Frequency L (mm) h (mm) d (mm)

2450MHz 51.5 30.4 3.6

6.2.2. System Check Result

System Performance Check at 2450MHz for Head

Validation Kit: SN 46/11 DIP 2G450-189
Target Reference Result Tested Tissue
Frequency Value(W/kg) (± 10%) Value(W/kg) Temp. Test time
[MHz]
1g 10g 1g 10g 1g 10g [°C]
2450 53.97 24.01 48.573-59.367 21.609-26.411 54.15 24.31 20.5 Sep. 14,2021
Note:
(1) We use a CW signal of 18dBm for system check, and then all SAR values are normalized to 1W forward
power. The result must be within ±10% of target value.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 19 of 33

7. EUT TEST POSITION

This EUT was tested in Back.

7.1. Test Position

(1) To position the EUT parallel to the phantom surface.
(2) To adjust the EUT parallel to the flat phantom.
(3) To adjust the distance between the EUT surface and the flat phantom to 0mm.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 20 of 33

8. SAR EXPOSURE LIMITS

Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (W/kg)
Type Exposure Uncontrolled Environment Limit (W/kg)
Spatial Peak SAR (1g cube tissue for brain or body) 1.60
Spatial Average SAR (Whole body) 0.08
Spatial Peak SAR (Limbs) 4.0
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 21 of 33

9. TEST FACILITY
Test Site Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd

1-2/F, Building 19, Junfeng Industrial Park, Chongqing Road, Heping Community,
Location
Fuhai Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Designation Number CN1259

A2LA Cert. No. 5054.02

Description Attestation of Global Compliance(Shenzhen) Co., Ltd is accredited by A2LA

 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 22 of 33

10. TEST EQUIPMENT LIST

Equipment Manufacturer/ Current Next calibration
Identification No.
description Model calibration date date
SAR Probe MVG SN 03/18 EP327 Dec. 17,2020 Dec. 16,2021
Validated. No cal Validated. No cal
Phantom SATIMO SN_4511_SAM90
required. required.
Validated. No cal Validated. No cal
Liquid SATIMO -
required. required.
Multimeter Keithley 2000 1350784 Aug. 18,2021 Aug. 17,2022
OpenSAR
SAR Software SATIMO-OpenSAR N/A N/A
V4_02_32
SN 46/11 DIP
Dipole SATIMO SID2450 Apr. 26,2019 Apr. 25,2022
2G450-189
Signal Generator Agilent-E4438C US41461365 Aug. 18,2021 Aug. 17,2022
Vector Analyzer Agilent / E4440A MY44303916 Mar. 21,2021 Mar. 20,2022
Rhode & Schwarz
Network Analyzer SN101443 Oct. 16,2020 Oct. 15,2021
ZVL6
Warison
Attenuator S/N:WRJ34AYM2F1 June 09,2021 June 08,2022
/WATT-6SR1211
Mini-circuits /
Attenuator 31405 June 09,2021 June 08,2022
VAT-10+
Amplifier AS0104-55_55 1004793 June 10,2021 June 09,2022
Directional Werlatone/
SN99463 May 15,2020 May 14,2022
Couple C5571-10
Directional Werlatone/
SN99482 May 15,2020 May 14,2022
Couple C6026-10
Power Sensor NRP-Z21 1137.6000.02 Sep. 07,2021 Sep. 06,2022
Power Sensor NRP-Z23 100323 Feb. 17,2021 Feb. 16,2022
Power Viewer R&S V2.3.1.0 N/A N/A
Note: Per KDB 865664 Dipole SAR Validation, AGC Lab has adopted 3 years calibration intervals. On annual basis,
every measurement dipole has been evaluated and is in compliance with the following criteria:
1. There is no physical damage on the dipole;
2. System validation with specific dipole is within 10% of calibrated value;
3. Return-loss is within 20% of calibrated measurement;
4. Impedance is within 5Ω of calibrated measurement.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 23 of 33

11. MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY

SATIMO Uncertainty- SN 03/18 EP327
Measurement uncertainty for DUT averaged over 1 gram / 10 gram.
Tol Prob. 1g Ui 10g Ui
Uncertainty Component Sec. Div. Ci (1g) Ci (10g) vi
(+- %) Dist. (+-%) (+-%)
Measurement System
Probe calibration E.2.1 7.000 N 1 1 1 7.000 7.000 ∞
Axial Isotropy E.2.2 0.075 R 3 √0.5 √0.5 0.031 0.031 ∞
Hemispherical Isotropy E.2.2 0.075 R 3 √0.5 √0.5 0.031 0.031 ∞
Boundary effect E.2.3 1.000 R 3 1 1 0.577 0.577 ∞
Linearity E.2.4 0.870 R 3 1 1 0.502 0.502 ∞
System detection limits E.2.4 1.000 R 3 1 1 0.577 0.577 ∞
Modulation response E2.5 3.000 R 3 1 1 1.732 1.732 ∞
Readout Electronics E.2.6 0.021 N 1 1 1 0.021 0.021 ∞
Response Time E.2.7 0.000 R 3 1 1 0.000 0.000 ∞
Integration Time E.2.8 1.400 R 3 1 1 0.808 0.808 ∞
RF ambient conditions-Noise E.6.1 3.000 R 3 1 1 1.732 1.732 ∞
RF ambient
E.6.1 3.000 R 3 1 1 1.732 1.732 ∞
conditions-reflections
Probe positioner mechanical
E.6.2 1.400 R 3 1 1 0.808 0.808 ∞
tolerance
Probe positioning with respect
E.6.3 1.400 R 3 1 1 0.808 0.808 ∞
to phantom shell
Extrapolation, interpolation,
and integrations algorithms for E.5 2.300 R 3 1 1 1.328 1.328 ∞
max. SAR evaluation
Test sample Related
Test sample positioning E.4.2 2.6 N 1 1 1 2.600 2.600 ∞
Device holder uncertainty E.4.1 3 N 1 1 1 3.000 3.000 ∞
Output power variation—SAR
E.2.9 5 R 3 1 1 2.887 2.887 ∞
drift measurement
SAR scaling E.6.5 5 R 3 1 1 2.887 2.887 ∞
Phantom and tissue parameters
Phantom shell
uncertainty—shape, thickness, E.3.1 4 R 3 1 1 2.309 2.309 ∞
and permittivity
Uncertainty in SAR correction
for deviations in permittivity and E.3.2 1.9 N 1 1 0.84 1.900 1.596 ∞
conductivity
Liquid conductivity
E.3.3 2.5 R 3 0.78 0.71 1.126 1.025 ∞
measurement
Liquid permittivity
E.3.3 4 N 1 0.78 0.71 3.120 2.840 M
measurement
Liquid
conductivity—temperature E.3.4 2.5 R 3 0.23 0.26 0.332 0.375 ∞
uncertainty
Liquid
permittivity—temperature E.3.4 5 N 1 0.23 0.26 1.150 1.300 M
uncertainty
Combined Standard
RSS 10.525 10.341
Uncertainty
Expanded Uncertainty
K=2 21.051 20.681
(95% Confidence interval)
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 24 of 33

SATIMO Uncertainty- SN 03/18 EP327

System Validation uncertainty for DUT averaged over 1 gram / 10 gram.
Tol Prob. 1g Ui 10g Ui
Sec. Div. Ci (1g) Ci (10g) vi
Uncertainty Component (+- %) Dist. (+-%) (+-%)
Measurement System
Probe calibration E.2.1 7.000 N 1 1 1 7.000 7.000 ∞
Axial Isotropy E.2.2 0.075 R 3 1 1 0.043 0.043 ∞
Hemispherical Isotropy E.2.2 0.075 R 3 0 0 0.000 0.000 ∞
Boundary effect E.2.3 1.000 R 3 1 1 0.577 0.577 ∞
Linearity E.2.4 0.870 R 3 1 1 0.502 0.502 ∞
System detection limits E.2.4 1.0 R 3 1 1 0.58 0.58 ∞
Modulation response E2.5 3.0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Readout Electronics E.2.6 0.021 N 1 1 1 0.021 0.021 ∞
Response Time E.2.7 0.0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Integration Time E.2.8 1.4 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
RF ambient conditions-Noise E.6.1 3.0 R 3 1 1 1.73 1.73 ∞
RF ambient conditions-reflections E.6.1 3.0 R 3 1 1 1.73 1.73 ∞
Probe positioner mechanical
E.6.2 1.4 R 3 1 1 0.81 0.81 ∞
tolerance
Probe positioning with respect to
E.6.3 1.4 R 3 1 1 0.81 0.81 ∞
phantom shell
Extrapolation, interpolation, and
integrations algorithms for max. E.5 2.3 R 3 1 1 1.33 1.33 ∞
SAR evaluation
System validation source
Deviation of experimental dipole
E.6.4 5.0 N 1 1 1 5.00 5.00 ∞
from numerical dipole
Input power and SAR drift
8,6.6.4 5.0 R 3 1 1 2.89 2.89 ∞
measurement
Dipole axis to liquid distance 8,E.6.6 2.0 R 3 1 1 1.15 1.15 ∞
Phantom and set-up
Phantom shell uncertainty—shape,
E.3.1 4.0 R 3 1 1 2.31 2.31 ∞
thickness, and permittivity
Uncertainty in SAR correction for
deviations in permittivity and E.3.2 1.9 N 1 1 0.84 1.90 1.60 ∞
conductivity
Liquid conductivity（temperature
E.3.3 2.5 R 3 0.78 0.71 1.13 1.02 ∞
uncertainty）
Liquid conductivity（measured） E.3.3 4 N 1 0.78 0.71 3.12 2.84 M
Liquid permittivity（temperature
E.3.4 2.5 R 3 0.23 0.26 0.33 0.38 ∞
uncertainty）
Liquid permittivity（measured） E.3.4 5 N 1 0.23 0.26 1.15 1.30 M
Combined Standard Uncertainty RSS 10.458 10.272
Expanded Uncertainty
K=2 20.916 20.543
(95% Confidence interval)
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 25 of 33

SATIMO Uncertainty- SN 03/18 EP327

System Check uncertainty for DUT averaged over 1 gram / 10 gram.
Tol Prob. 1g Ui 10g Ui
Uncertainty Component Sec. Div. Ci (1g) Ci (10g) vi
(+- %) Dist. (+-%) (+-%)
Measurement System
Probe calibration drift E.2.1.3 0.5 N 1 1 1 0.50 0.50 ∞
Axial Isotropy E.2.2 0.075 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Hemispherical Isotropy E.2.2 0.075 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Boundary effect E.2.3 1.000 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Linearity E.2.4 0.870 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
System detection limits E.2.4 1.0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Modulation response E2.5 3.0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Readout Electronics E.2.6 0.021 N 1 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Response Time E.2.7 0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
Integration Time E.2.8 1.4 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
RF ambient conditions-Noise E.6.1 3.0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
RF ambient
E.6.1 3.0 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
conditions-reflections
Probe positioner mechanical
E.6.2 1.4 R 3 1 1 0.81 0.81 ∞
tolerance
Probe positioning with respect
E.6.3 1.4 R 3 1 1 0.81 0.81 ∞
to phantom shell
Extrapolation, interpolation,
and integrations algorithms for E.5 2.3 R 3 0 0 0.00 0.00 ∞
max. SAR evaluation
System check source (dipole)
Deviation of experimental
E.6.4 2.0 N 1 1 1 2.00 2.00 ∞
dipoles
Input power and SAR drift
8,6.6.4 5.0 R 3 1 1 2.89 2.89 ∞
measurement
Dipole axis to liquid distance 8,E.6.6 2.0 R 3 1 1 1.15 1.15 ∞
Phantom and tissue parameters
Phantom shell
uncertainty—shape, thickness, E.3.1 4 R 3 1 1 2.31 2.31 ∞
and permittivity
Uncertainty in SAR correction
for deviations in permittivity and E.3.2 1.9 N 1 1 0.84 1.90 1.60 ∞
conductivity
Liquid conductivity
E.3.3 2.5 R 3 0.78 0.71 1.13 1.02 ∞
measurement
Liquid permittivity
E.3.3 4 N 1 0.78 0.71 3.12 2.84 M
measurement
Liquid
conductivity—temperature E.3.4 2.5 R 3 0.23 0.26 0.33 0.38 ∞
uncertainty
Liquid
permittivity—temperature E.3.4 5 N 1 0.23 0.26 1.15 1.30 M
uncertainty
Combined Standard
RSS 5.562 5.203
Uncertainty
Expanded Uncertainty
K=2 11.124 10.406
(95% Confidence interval)
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 26 of 33

12. CONDUCTED POWER MEASUREMENT

Bluetooth_BR/EDR
Modulation Channel Frequency(MHz) Peak Power (dBm)
0 2402 10.410
GFSK
39 2441 10.900
(1DH5)
78 2480 11.137
0 2402 10.391
π /4-DQPSK
39 2441 10.826
(2DH5)
78 2480 11.074
0 2402 10.317
8-DPSK
39 2441 10.854
(3DH5)
78 2480 11.081

Bluetooth_BLE
Peak Power
Modulation Channel Frequency(MHz)
(dBm)
0 2402 3.263
GFSK 19 2440 3.819
39 2480 4.154
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 27 of 33

13. TEST RESULTS

13.1. SAR Test Results Summary

13.1.1. Test position and configuration
1. The EUT is a model of portable TWS bluetooth ear bud.
2. According to KDB 447498 D01 General RF Exposure Guide v06, due to maximum peak power for
Bluetooth(BR/EDR) is more than just a test exclusion threshold, which must be tested.
3. SAR test method:
(1) Lab. use the head liquid with a separation of 0mm at flat phantom to test back.
4. For SAR testing, the device was controlled by software to test at reference fixed frequency points.
5. According to KDB 447498 D01, annex A, SAR is not required for bluetooth because its maximum output
power is less than 10 mW.

13.1.2. Operation Mode

1. Per KDB 447498 D01 v06 ,for each exposure position, if the highest 1-g SAR is ≤ 0.8 W/kg, testing for
low and high channel is optional.
2. Per KDB 865664 D01 v01r04,for each frequency band, if the measured SAR is ≥0.8W/kg, testing for
repeated SAR measurement is required , that the highest measured SAR is only to be tested. When the
SAR results are near the limit, the following procedures are required for each device to verify these types of
SAR measurement related variation concerns by repeating the highest measured SAR configuration in
each frequency band.
(1) When the original highest measured SAR is ≥0.8W/kg, repeat that measurement once.
(2) Perform a second repeated measurement only if the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original and
first repeated measurements is >1.20 or when the original or repeated measurement is ≥1.45 W/kg.
(3) Perform a third repeated measurement only if the original, first and second repeated measurement is
≥1.5 W/kg and ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original, first and second measurement is ≥
1.20.
3. Maximum Scaling SAR in order to calculate the Maximum SAR values to test under the standard Peak
Power, Calculation method is as follows:
Maximum Scaling SAR =tested SAR (Max.) ×[maximum turn-up power (mw)/ maximum measurement
output power(mw) ]
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 28 of 33

13.1.3. Test Result

SAR MEASUREMENT
Depth of Liquid (cm):>15 Relative Humidity (%): 53.1
Product: Wireless Headphone
Test Mode: Bluetooth for head liquid
Max. Meas.
Power Scaled
Fr. SAR (1g) Tune-up output Limit
Position Mode Ch. Drift SAR
(MHz) (W/kg) Power Power W/kg
(<±5%) (W/kg)
(dBm) (dBm)
Back 1DH5 39 2441 0.06 0.307 11.20 10.900 0.329 1.6
Note:
·When the 1-g SAR is ≤ 0.8W/kg, testing for low and high channel is optional.
·The test separation of all above table is 0mm.
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 29 of 33

APPENDIX A. SAR SYSTEM CHECK DATA

Test Laboratory: AGC Lab Date: Sep. 14,2021
System Check Head 2450 MHz
DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz Type: SID 2450
Communication System CW; Communication System Band: D2450 (2450.0 MHz); Duty Cycle: 1:1; Conv.F=4.32
Frequency: 2450 MHz; Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ=1.83 mho/m; εr =38.65; ρ= 1000 kg/m³ ;
Phantom section: Flat Section; Input Power=18dBm
Ambient temperature (℃):20.6, Liquid temperature (℃): 20.5

SATIMO Configuration
• Probe: SSE5; Calibrated: Dec. 17,2020; Serial No.: SN 03/18 EP327
• Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
• Phantom: SAM twin phantom
• Measurement SW: OpenSAR V4_02_32

Configuration/System Check 2450MHz Head/Area Scan: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm

Configuration/System Check 2450MHz Head/Zoom Scan: Measurement grid: dx=5mm,dy=5mm, dz=5mm

SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR

Maximum location: X=1.00, Y=0.00

SAR Peak: 6.39 W/kg
SAR 10g (W/Kg) 1.533650
SAR 1g (W/Kg) 3.416521
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 30 of 33

Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00

SAR 6.4149 3.6936 1.7300 0.8348 0.4032 0.2004 0.0988
(W/Kg)

3D screen shot Hot spot position

 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 31 of 33

APPENDIX B. SAR MEASUREMENT DATA

Test Laboratory: AGC Lab Date: Sep. 14,2021
Bluetooth(BR/EDR) Mid- Back (1DH5)
DUT: Wireless Headphone; Type: A3945L

Communication System: BT; Communication System Band: Bluetooth; Duty Cycle:57.79%;Conv.F=4.32;

Frequency: 2441 MHz; Medium parameters used: f = 2450 MHz; σ=1.81 mho/m; εr =39.72; ρ= 1000 kg/m³ ;
Phantom section: Flat Section
Ambient temperature (℃):20.6, Liquid temperature (℃): 20.5

SATIMO Configuration:
• Probe: SSE5; Calibrated: Dec. 17,2020; Serial No.: SN 03/18 EP327
• Sensor-Surface: 4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
• Phantom: SAM twin phantom
• Measurement SW: OpenSAR V4_02_32

Configuration/Bluetooth Mid- Body- Back /Area Scan: Measurement grid: dx=8mm, dy=8mm
Configuration/Bluetooth Mid- Body- Back /Zoom Scan: Measurement grid: dx=5mm,dy=5mm, dz=5mm;

Area Scan surf_sam_plan.txt, h= 5.00 mm

ZoomScan 7x7x7,dx=5mm dy=5mm dz=5mm
Phantom Validation plane
Device Position Body Back
Band Bluetooth
Channels Middle
Signal Crest factor: 1.73

SURFACE SAR VOLUME SAR

Maximum location: X=1.00, Y=1.00

SAR Peak: 0.67 W/kg
SAR 10g (W/Kg) 0.114902
SAR 1g (W/Kg) 0.306524
 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 32 of 33

Z (mm) 0.00 4.00 9.00 14.00 19.00 24.00 29.00

SAR 0.6379 0.3417 0.1389 0.0563 0.0240 0.0107 0.0051
(W/Kg)

3D screen shot Hot spot position

 Report No.: AGC01110210838FH01
Page 33 of 33

APPENDIX C. TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS

Refer to Attached files.

APPENDIX D. CALIBRATION DATA

Refer to Attached files.
 Conditions of Issuance of Test Reports
1. All samples and goods are accepted by the Attestation of Global Compliance (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd (the “Company”) solely for

testing and reporting in accordance with the following terms and conditions. The company provides its services on the basis that such
terms and conditions constitute express agreement between the company and any person, firm or company requesting its services (the

“Clients”).
2. Any report issued by Company as a result of this application for testing services (the “Report”) shall be issued in confidence to the

Clients and the Report will be strictly treated as such by the Company. It may not be reproduced either in its entirety or in part and it
may not be used for advertising or other unauthorized purposes without the written consent of the Company. The Clients to whom the

Report is issued may, however, show or send it, or a certified copy thereof prepared by the Company to its customer, supplier or other
persons directly concerned. The Company will not, without the consent of the Clients, enter into any discussion or correspondence

with any third party concerning the contents of the Report, unless required by the relevant governmental authorities, laws or court
orders.

3.The Company shall not be called or be liable to be called to give evidence or testimony on the Report in a court of law without its
prior written consent, unless required by the relevant governmental authorities, laws or court orders.

4. The non-CMA report issued by AGC is only permitted to be used by the client as internal reference use and shall not be used for
public demonstration purpose.

5. In the event of the improper use of the report as determined by the Company, the Company reserves the right to withdraw it, and to
adopt any other additional remedies which may be appropriate.

6. Samples submitted for testing are accepted on the understanding that the Report issued cannot form the basis of, or be the
instrument for, any legal action against the Company.

7. The Company will not be liable for or accept responsibility for any loss or damage however arising from the use of information
contained in any of its Reports or in any communication whatsoever about its said tests or investigations.

8.Clients wishing to use the Report in court proceedings or arbitration shall inform the Company to that effect prior to submitting the
sample for testing.

9. The Company is not responsible for recalling the electronic version of the original report when any revision is made to them. The
Client assumes the responsibility to providing the revised version to any interested party who uses them.

10. Subject to the variable length of retention time for test data and report stored hereinto as otherwise specifically required by
individual accreditation authorities, the Company will only keep the supporting test data and information of the test report for a

period of six years. The data and information will be disposed of after the aforementioned retention period has elapsed. Under no
circumstances shall we provide any data and information which has been disposed of after retention period. Under no circumstances

shall we be liable for damage of any kind, including (but not limited to) compensatory damages, lost profits, lost data, or any form of
special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages of any kind, whether based on breach of contract of warranty, tort

(including negligence), product liability or otherwise, even if we are informed in advance of the possibility of such damages.