Evolving Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: From Traditional Methods To Component Separation by Dr. Lana Al-Sabe
Evolving Techniques in Open Ventral Hernia Repair: From Traditional Methods To Component Separation by Dr. Lana Al-Sabe
OVHR
Lana Al-Sabe, PGY-4
Moderated by Dr. Rami Addasi
OUTLINE
•Definition
•Prevention Strategies
•Surgical Techniques
•Anatomy
•Mesh Planes
•Rives-Stoppa
•AWR/CST
Secondary
Parastomal
Primary
Incisional Hernia
• Despite advancements in techniques for abdominal wall closure, the
incisional hernia rate following laparotomy is as high 15% to 20%
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535797/
Incisional Hernia
• Patient, wound and surgeon factors mainly technical failure
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535797/
The State Of Art
Abdominal Wall Closure in Elective Midline
Laparotomy
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00034
“Never judge the surgeon until you have seen him closing the wound” - Lord Moynihan
Surgical techniques
• Ventral hernia repairs (VHR) are among the most common operations performed by general surgeons
each year
• Primary repairs of incisional hernia include both simple suture closure and components separation
• Primary repair without mesh reinforcement is not recommended today because of the high risk of
recurrence 30-50% and should typically be reserved for defects < 2 cm. However, they may be the only
option in the presence of gross contamination such as peritonitis
• Mesh should be used in all elective repair of incision hernias as they reduce the rate of recurrence <20%
and abdominal pain without increase in complications
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK435995/
Can Mesh Be Used in
Contaminated or
Clean/Contaminated Fields?
• Clean: For patients with intestinal incarceration and no signs of intestinal strangulation or concurrent bowel
resection a synthetic mesh is recommended and is associated with lower recurrence rate, without an increase
in the wound infection rate. (Grade 1A recommendation)
• Clean-contaminated: For patients having a complicated hernia with intestinal strangulation and/or
concomitant need of bowel resection without gross enteric spillage a synthetic mesh can be performed
(without any increase in 30-day wound-related morbidity) and is associated with a significant lower risk of
recurrence. (Grade 1A recommendation)
• Contaminated/ Dirty: For stable patients with strangulated hernia with bowel necrosis and/or gross enteric
spillage during intestinal resection, or peritonitis from bowel perforation, primary repair is recommended
when the size of the defect is small (< 3 cm); when direct suture is not feasible, a biological mesh may be
used for repair. (Grade 2C recommendation)
Know The
Anatomy!
Where To Place The
Mesh?
Onlay Premuscular
• Popularized by Chevrel in 1979
• Placing the mesh on the anterior rectus sheath
• High wound morbidity
Inlay
• Previously “interposition”
• Placing the mesh in the defect
• Large defects which cannot be closed primarily
• The mesh acts a bridge between the two fascial edges> primary fascial closure is superior to
bridged repair
• Tension reduction techniques have evolved: ACS and PCS
Sublay
• First described by Rives-Stoppa
• Placing the mesh anterior to the peritoneum and posterior to the rectus abdominis.
• Above the arcuate line: Retrorectus/ prefascial space
• Below the arcuate line: Retrofascial/ preperitoneal space
Intraperitoneal
• Placing the mesh in the peritoneal cavity, intraperitoneal onlay mesh : IPOM
• Previously underlay
• Mesh adhesion, migration and fistulization
Are We Using The Same
Language?
From Rives-Stoppa to TAR
The Evolution…
Hernia
Albanese Rives Chevrel
recognized
CST Retrorectus repair Onlay
as problem
-Limited surface area in the retrorectus space prevents wide mesh overlap
• Because Rives-Stoppa technique was not sufficient, large defects were
not closed but rather bridged (interposition mesh) which led physiological
derangement of the abdominal wall and high RR up to 30%
Alternative?
Component separation techniques
Release one of the lateral muscles to allow myofascial advancement
toward the midline which aids in primary fascial closure
Combined PRS release with EOR
The classic ACS (Ramirez)
Can
• Start achieve a bilateral advancement of 10cm, 20cm, 6cm in
as Rives-Stoppa
• Closure of the anterior rectus sheath & Recreation of the Linea alba
Tailored Surgery Is Always The Best
VHR
Robotic Laparoscopic Open
Mesh
Primary repair
reinforcement
Suture Underlay/
CST Only Inlay Sublay
closure
IPOM
PCS Retrorectus
ACS Preperitoneal
CCS
Any
Questions?
REFERENCES