Ch10 Q&A
Ch10 Q&A
The answer key is at the end of this file. The objective of this workbook is to
complement the material from class. This is not an exhaustive list of the topics or types
of questions that will appear on the exams. Students should carefully read and study the
book, the videos, all the material on Blackboard (including the homework), and their own
class notes, including all the examples, exercises, and graphs from class.
Chapter 9 Question 2:
Player 2 U 20 , 3 8 , 2 7, 4
L R Player 1
U 5 , 3 2 , 2 M 9 , 11 10 , 10 4, 9
Player 1
D 6 , 3 7 , 4 D 4 , 4 8 , 2 8, 7
This is a simultaneous move game. Find This is a simultaneous move game. Find
the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this
game. game.
(A) (U,L) (A) (U,L)
(B) (U,R)
(B) (U,R)
(C) (D,L)
(C) (M,C)
(D) (D,R)
(D) (D,L)
(E) This game does not have a pure strategy
Nash equilibrium. (E) (D,R)
1
Question 3:
The following table contains the possible This is a simultaneous move game. In the
actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game,
Player 1 receives a payoff
Player 2
L C R
(A) 4
U 20 , 3 8 , 2 7, 4
(B) 7
Player 1
M 4 , 9 10 , 10 4, 9 (C) 8
(D) 9
D 4 , 7 8 , 2 8, 4
(E) 5
2
Question 6: (A) one ; zero ; one
Player 1 and Player 2 will play one round (B) zero ; one ; zero
of the following simultaneous move game: (C) zero ; zero ; zero
Player 2 (D) 1/3 ; 1/3 ; 1/3
L C R
(E) Any strategy is a best response for
U 1, 3 2, 4 5, 2 Player 1
Player 1
M 4, 2 2, 3 3, 1
D 1, 4 4, 5 3, 1
(A) 2.9
(B) 3
(C) 2.7
(D) 2.5
(E) 2.3
Question 7:
3
Question 8: Player B
L C R
Player 1 and Player 2 will play one round
of the following simultaneous move game: U 5 , 1 -4 , 2 -5 , 3
Player A
Player 2 M 2 , 3 -3 , 1 1 , 2
L C R
U 2, 3 7, 4 0, 2 D -1 , 2 2 , 3 0 , 1
Player 1
M 3, 2 2, 3 3, 1
Suppose Player B is using a non-optimal
D 1, 4 4, 5 3, 1 strategy: she plays
4
Question 10: Question 12:
Consider the following simultaneous move Consider the following simultaneous move
game: game:
Player 2 Player 2
L R L R
U 10 , 0 0 , 10 U 5 , 5 1 , 6
Player 1 Player 1
D 0 , 10 10 , 0 D 6 , 1 4 , 4
III - There is no Nash Equilibrium in this III - The Nash Equilibrium of this game is
game Player 1 plays U and Player 2 plays L
(A) I and II are true, III is false (A) I, II and III are true
(B) III is true, I and II are false (B) I and II are true, III is false
(C) I, II and III are true (C) I and III are true, II is false
(D) I is true, II and III are false (D) II and III are true, I is false
(E) I, II and III are false (E) I, II and III are false
The game in the previous question is an The game in the previous question is an
example of example of
(A) Battle of the Sexes (A) Battle of the Sexes
5
Question 14: Player 2
Not
Consider the following simultaneous move Confess Confess
game:
Confess x , x 20 , 0
Player 1
Player 2
L R Not
0 , 20 10 , 10
U +3 , -3 -2 , -2 Confess
Player 1
D 0 , 0 -3 , +3
(A) x = −10
(B) x = −5
This game is best described as a
game. In the equilibrium of this game, play- (C) x = 5
ers use a strategy. (D) x = 15
U 3 , 3 2 , 2
Player 1
Question 15:
D 2 , 2 3 , 3
Professor Camara is trying to write a
Game Theory question for the ECON 351
final exam. He would like to construct an This game is an example of
example of a Prisoner’s Dilemma game. He
came up with the following table containing (A) Battle of the Sexes
the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 (B) Pure Coordination Game
and 2.
However, he is having a hard time trying (C) Prisoner’s Dilemma
to choose a payoff x for each player when both
players play “confess”. For this game to be a (D) Assurance
good example of a Prisoner’s Dilemma game, (E) Matching Pennies
the missing payoff x of each player should be
.
6
Question 17: II - Players do not have a dominant strat-
egy
Consider the following simultaneous move
game: III - Because in this game players do not
have dominant strategies, in equilib-
Player 2 rium players must play a mixed strat-
L R egy
(B) Matching Pennies; one Firm 1 and Firm 2 are Cournot competi-
tors. They have the same cost function
(C) Matching Pennies; no
C1 = 16Q1
(D) Battle of the Sexes; no C2 = 16Q2 .
(E) Battle of the Sexes; more than one The market demand is
QD = 110 − 0.5P
Question 18:
Compute the equilibrium of this Cournot
Consider the following simultaneous move game. What is the price in this market?
game:
(A) P = 84
Player 2
L R (B) P = 82
(C) P = 78
U 5 , 5 4 , 6
Player 1 (D) P = 88
D 6 , 4 1 , 1
(E) P = 76
7
Question 20: (B) M S1 = 52%
Firm 1 and Firm 2 are Cournot competi- c) Now suppose Firm 1 and Firm 2 behave
tors. They are the only producers of output as Bertrand competitors. Compute the
Q. The demand for Q is equilibrium price, quantities and profits of
each firm. Compute the Lerner Index of
QD = 780 − 2P. Market Power.
For each firm, the cost function is
C1 = 10Q1
C2 = 20Q2 .
8
Question 24: (A) I, II, III and IV are true
The Cournot duopoly equilibrium has (B) I, II, III and IV are false
price, total output, and (C) I and II are true, III and IV are false
consumer surplus than those of a per-
fectly competitive market. (D) I and II are false, III and IV are true
Consider the following information about In the Bertrand equilibrium, each firm pro-
the market: duces units of output.
QD = 300 − P (B) Q1 = Q2 = 10
(C) Q1 = Q2 = 52.5
Cost Function of each Firm:
(D) Q1 = Q2 = 105
C = 10Q
(E) Q1 = Q2 = 56.5
(C) L = M C
II - QP C = QB > QC > QM
(D) L = AC
III - DW LP C = DW LB < DW LC < DW LM
(E) L = 0.5
IV - LP C = LB < LC < LM
9
Solutions to the Questions
1: (D) (D,R).
Player 2
L R
U 5 , 3 2 , 2
Player 1
D 6 , 3 7 , 4
2: (E) (D,R).
Player 2
L C R
U 20 , 3 8 , 2 7 , 4
Player 1
M 9 , 11 10 , 10 4 , 9
D 4 , 4 8 , 2 8 , 7
3: (D) 10.
Player 2
L C R
U 20 , 3 8 , 2 7 , 4
Player 1
M 4 , 9 10 , 10 4 , 9
D 4 , 7 8 , 2 8 , 4
4: (B) 7.
10
Player 2
L CL CR R
U 2 , 3 9 , 2 7 , 1 7 , 4
Player 1
MU 4 , 8 1 , 1 4 , 8 4 , 9
MD 5 , 7 8 , 9 5 , 4 4 , 5
D 4 , 7 8 , 2 8 , 4 4 , 9
5: (C) I is true, II and III are false. I is true by definition. II and III are false: for
example, in a Battle of Sexes game, neither player has a dominant strategy, but we do have
an equilibrium in pure strategies.
6: (A) 2.9. If P1 plays U, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 1 + 0.3 × 2 + 0.4 × 5 = 2.9.
7: (B) zero ; one ; zero. Compute the expected payoff from each possible action of player
1:
If P1 plays U, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 1 + 0.3 × 2 + 0.4 × 5 = 2.9.
If P1 plays M, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 4 + 0.3 × 2 + 0.4 × 3 = 3.
If P1 plays D, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 1 + 0.3 × 4 + 0.4 × 3 = 2.7.
Therefore, action M yields a strictly higher payoff, and P1 should play M with probability
one.
8: (E) Any strategy is a best response for Player 1. Compute the expected payoff from
each possible action of player 1:
If P1 plays U, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 2 + 0.3 × 7 + 0.4 × 0 = 2.7.
If P1 plays M, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 3 + 0.3 × 2 + 0.4 × 3 = 2.7.
If P1 plays D, then his expected payoff is = 0.3 × 1 + 0.3 × 4 + 0.4 × 3 = 2.7.
Therefore, Player 1 is indifferent between all his actions (that is, all the different actions
yield the same expected payoff for Player 1).
9: (C) I and II are true, III is false. Compute the expected utility of Player A, for each one
of the possible actions:
PA expected utility if he plays U: 0.50 × (5) + 0.30 × (−4) + 0.20 × (−5) = 0.3
PA expected utility if he plays M: 0.50 × (2) + 0.30 × (−3) + 0.20 × (1) = 0.3
11
PA expected utility if he plays D: 0.50 × (−1) + 0.30 × (2) + 0.20 × (0) = 0.1
Note that U and M yield the highest payoff (0.3), while D yields a lower payoff. Therefore,
PA should play D with probability zero. What about U and M? Since both yield the same
highest payoff, the player is indifferent between ANY mix of U and M. That is, as long as
the probability of D is zero, any other strategy is a best response. The strategies below are
just a few examples of the many possible best responses:
U with probability 100%.
10: (A) I and II are true, III is false. III is false because this game does have a Nash
equilibrium in mixed strategies: Player 1 randomizes between U and D with probability 50%
each, while Player 2 randomizes between L and R with probability 50% each.
Player 2
L R
U 10 , 0 0 , 10
Player 1
D 0 , 10 10 , 0
12: (E) I, II and III are false. Player 1’s dominant strategy is D, Player 2’s dominant
strategy is R, and the equilibrium of this game is (D,R).
Player 2
L R
U 5 , 5 1 , 6
Player 1
D 6 , 1 4 , 4
12
13: (C) Prisoner’s Dilemma. Note how the equilibrium (D,R) in dominant strategies
yields payoff (4,4), while there is another outcome (U,L) that would benefit both players by
providing the higher payoff (5,5), but this option is not an equilibrium.
14: (A) Prisoner’s Dilemma; pure. Note how the equilibrium (U,R) in dominant strategies
yields payoff (-2,-2), while there is another outcome (D,L) that would benefit both players
by providing the higher payoff (0,0), but this option is not an equilibrium.
Player 2
L R
U +3 , -3 -2 , -2
Player 1
D 0 , 0 -3 , +3
15: (C) x = 5. To be a Prisoner’s Dilemma game, we need two conditions: confess must be
a dominant strategy, and the payoff from (confess, confess) must be lower than the payoff
from (not confess, not confess).
First, we need x > 0, so that “Confess” is a dominant strategy. If x < 0, then Player 1
would like to choose “Not Confess” if he believes Player 2 is choosing “Confess”. If x > 0,
then (Confess, Confess) is the unique Nash equilibrium.
Second, we need the Nash equilibrium (Confess, Confess) to result in a lower payoff than
(Not Confess, Not Confess). That is, we need x < 10.
Hence, it must be the case that 0 < x < 10. The only option in this range is 5.
16: (B) Pure Coordination Game. Note how there are two equilibria in pure strategies and
players are indifferent between these two equilibria.
Player 2
L R
U 3 , 3 2 , 2
Player 1
D 2 , 2 3 , 3
17: (E) Battle of the Sexes; more than one. Note that there are two equilibria in pure
strategies. One player prefers one equilibrium, while the other player prefers the other
equilibrium.
13
Player 2
L R
U +1 , +1 +2 , +3
Player 1
D +3 , +2 +1 , +1
18: (C) I and II are true, III is false. III is false because this game has two pure strategy
equilibria, (D,L) and (U,R). So it is not true that players “must” play mixed strategies in
this game. Note that this is a Battle of the Sexes game.
Player 2
L R
U 5 , 5 4 , 6
Player 1
D 6 , 4 1 , 1
14
Q∗2 = 51 − 0.5Q1 .
Equilibrium: We have a system of two equations and two variables:
Q∗1 = 51 − 0.5Q2
Q∗2 = 51 − 0.5Q1 .
Solve this system to find Q1 = Q2 = 34. The price is then P = 220 − 2Q1 − 2Q2 =
220 − 2 × 34 − 2 × 34 = 84.
20: The profit of Firm 1 is $338. Demand is QD = 40 − 0.5P , so inverse demand is:
QD = 40 − 0.5P
0.5P = 40 − QD
P = 80 − 2QD .
With two firms QD = Q1 + Q2 and we have P = 80 − 2Q1 − 2Q2 .
Firm 1:
Compute the marginal revenue
REV1 = P Q1
REV1 = (80 − 2Q1 − 2Q2 )Q1
REV1 = 80Q1 − 2Q21 − 2Q2 Q1
M R1 = 80 − 4Q1 − 2Q2
15
In this question, the firms are symmetric, hence the profit of firm 2 is also $338.
16
Equilibrium:
In equilibrium, Q1 is a best response for Q2 and vice-versa. That is, we need to solve the
system of two equations and two variables
The solution is Q∗1 = 14 and Q∗2 = 11. Notice that, because Firm 2 now has a higher marginal
cost than Firm 1, Firm 2 in equilibrium produces less output than Firm 1. The equilibrium
price is then P = 80 − 2Q1 − 2Q2 = 80 − 2 × 14 − 2 × 11 = 30. Notice that the new price is
now higher (it was 28 in the previous question), because of the new tax on Firm 2.
The profit of Firm 1 is then
Because of the tax on Firm 2, the profit of Firm 1 increases from $338 (in the previous
question) to $392.
Extra: Compute the profit of Firm 2.
Because of the tax, the profit of Firm 2 decreases from $338 (in the previous question) to $242.
22: (B) M S1 = 52%. Note that the firms have different cost functions, hence, in equilibrium,
they will produce different quantities.
Inverse demand: P = 390 − 0.5Q1 − 0.5Q2
Firm 1:
17
Firm 2:
Q1 = 380 − 0.5Q2
Q2 = 370 − 0.5Q1 .
REV= PQ
= (53 − Q)Q
= 53Q − Q2
MR = 53 − 2Q.
Profit maximization:
MR = MC
53 − 2Q = 5
Q = 24.
REV1 = P ∗ Q1
REV1 = (53 − Q1 − Q2 )Q1
REV1 = 53Q1 − Q21 − Q2 Q1
M R1 = 53 − 2Q1 − Q2 .
18
Profit maximization of Firm 1:
M R1 = M C1
53 − 2Q1 − Q2 = 5
Q1 = 24 − 0.5Q2 .
Note that Q1 = 24 − 0.5Q2 is the best response of Firm 1. Follow the same steps to find
the best response of Firm 2: Q2 = 24 − 0.5Q1 . We have a system of two equations and two
variables:
Q1 = 24 − 0.5Q2
Q2 = 24 − 0.5Q1 .
25: (A) I, II, III and IV are true. You do not need to do any computation to answer this
question. You should be able to answer the question by using what you have learned about
these different markets.
19
Perfect competition results in the highest total quantity Q and the lowest market price P,
with zero DWL (the market is efficient) and zero market power L = P −M P
C
= 0 (recall that
P = M C in perfect competition). We know that the Bertrand duopoly results in the same
outcomes as perfect competition. Moreover, the monopolist will choose the lowest quantity
to induce the highest price out of these four markets. The lowest quantity and highest price
result in the highest DWL (very inefficient market) and the highest Lerner Index (recall
that more market power is associated with a higher L). Finally, the degree of competition in
the Cournot duopoly is somewhere between perfect competition (very competitive) and the
monopoly (no competition). Therefore, the total quantity, price, DWL and Lerner index of
market power in Cournot are between PC and M.
26: (E) Q1 = Q2 = 56.5. The marginal cost of each firm is M C = 10, therefore in the
Bertrand competition each firm chooses a price P = 10. Total demand at this price is
Q = 118 − 0.5P = 118 − 0.5 × 10 = 113. The firms split the market and each firm produces
half of the total, 113
2
= 56.5.
27: (A) L = 0. Bertrand competition results in the same price as perfect competition
(P=MC), therefore L = P −M
P
C
= 0.
20