Structure of an argumentative paragraph
Structure of an argumentative paragraph
Claim Counterclaim
2. While many believe [counter-argument reason], it's clear that [topic] offers
significant [reason].
3. The benefits of [topic], such as [specific benefit], far outweigh the potential
drawbacks of [counter-argument reason].
Example: "The benefits of urban green spaces, such as improved air quality
and mental well-being, far outweigh the potential drawbacks of maintenance
costs."
4. [Topic] should be [action or stance] because of its [reason], even if some argue
[counter-argument reason].
5. In the debate over [topic], the evidence strongly supports [stance or action] due to
[reason], despite [counter-argument reason].
Example: "In the debate over GMO foods, the evidence strongly supports their
safety due to rigorous testing, despite concerns about long-term effects."
Structure of a typical argumentative Paragraph:
Sets the tone and direction for the rest of the paragraph.
2. Introduction to Evidence:
3. Evidence:
4. Reasoning:
6. Rebuttal:
Defends the original claim and explains why it still stands strong despite the
counterargument.
7. Transition:
Words or phrases that help guide the reader to the next point or argument.
8. Concluding Sentence:
Reiterates the main claim and leaves the reader with a final thought.
Example of an outline for an Argumentative Paragraph:
Counterclaim: "However, some argue that school uniforms suppress individuality and
creativity among students."
Rebuttal: "While individuality is important, the primary goal of schools is education, and
uniforms promote a distraction-free environment conducive to learning."
Transition: "Furthermore,"
Concluding Sentence: "Given the benefits of reduced bullying and a more focused learning
environment, the case for school uniforms is compelling."