JBVNL 2024 B
JBVNL 2024 B
Commission
Order on
True-up for FY 2022-23,
Annual Performance Review for FY 2023-24, and
Aggregate Revenue Requirement & Tariff for FY
2024-25
for
Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (JBVNL)
Ranchi,
September 30, 2024
True-up for FY 2022-23, APR for FY 2023-24, and ARR & Tariff for FY 2024-25
Contents
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 14
Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission ..................... 14
The Petitioner-Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited .................... 17
The Petitioner’s Prayers ................................................................. 18
Chapter 2: PROCEDURAL HISTORY .......................................... 19
Background .................................................................................. 19
Information Gaps in the Petition ................................................... 19
Inviting Public Comments/Suggestions ......................................... 21
Meeting of the State Advisory Committee....................................... 22
Submission of Comments/Suggestions and Conduct of Public
Hearing ......................................................................................... 22
Chapter 3: BRIEF FACTS OF THE PETITION............................. 23
True-up for FY 2022-23: ............................................................... 23
Energy Sales, Load, Number of Consumer ..................................... 23
Annual Revenue Requirement ....................................................... 24
Annual Performance Review 2023-24: ........................................... 25
Energy Sales ................................................................................. 25
Annual Revenue Requirement ....................................................... 26
Aggregate Revenue Requirement for FY 2024-25 ........................... 27
Energy Sales ................................................................................. 27
Annual Revenue Requirement ....................................................... 28
Chapter 4: PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS .......................... 29
Chapter 5: TRUE-UP FOR FY 2022-23 ...................................... 71
Energy Sales ................................................................................. 71
Energy Balance ............................................................................. 73
Power Purchase Cost .................................................................... 77
Transmission Charge .................................................................... 83
Capital Expenditure and Capitalization ......................................... 84
Consumer Contribution, Grants and Subsidies ............................. 87
Calculation of normative GFA, Loan and Equity ............................ 89
Operation and Maintenance Expenses (O&M) ................................ 91
Depreciation ................................................................................. 99
Interest on Loan.......................................................................... 101
List of Abbreviations
Abbreviation Description
A&G Administrative and General
ACS/ACoS Average Cost of Supply
APR Annual Performance Review
APTEL Appellate Tribunal for Electricity
ARR Aggregate Revenue Requirement
BG Bank Guarantee
CC Consumer Contribution
CGRF Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum
CSD Consumer Security Deposit
CWIP Capital Works in Progress
DVC Damodar Valley Corporation
FPA Fuel Purchase Adjustment
FY Financial Year
GFA Gross Fixed Assets
GoJ Government of Jharkhand
HP Horse Power
HT High Tension
IAS Irrigation and Agriculture Services
IEX Indian Energy Exchange
IFC Interest & Finance Charge
IoWC Interest on Working Capital
kW kilo Watt
kWh kilo Watt hour
kVA kilo Volt Ampere
kVAh kilo Volt-Ampere hour
MD Maximum Demand
MES Military and Engineering Services
MOD Merit Order Despatch
MU Million Units
NTI Non-Tariff Income
O&M Operation and Maintenance
PPA Power Purchase Agreement
R&M Repair and Maintenance
REC Renewable Energy Certificates
RoE Return on Equity
RPO Renewable Purchase Obligation
RTS Railway Traction Services
SBI State Bank of India
SERC State Electricity Regulatory Commission
SOP Standard of Performance
SS Street Light
List of Tables
Table 1: List of newspapers and dates of publication of public notice by
Petitioner. ................................................................................................... 21
Table 2: List of newspapers and dates of publication of Public Notice by
the Commission. ......................................................................................... 22
Table 3: Sales (in MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner. ............................ 23
Table 4: Connected Load (kVA) as submitted by the Petitioner. ............... 23
Table 5: Number of Consumer as submitted by the Petitioner. ................. 23
Table 6: ARR (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner ........................... 24
Table 7: Sales (in MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner. ............................ 25
Table 8: Connected Load (in kVA) as submitted by the Petitioner. ........... 25
Table 9: Number of consumer as submitted by the Petitioner. ................. 25
Table 10: ARR (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner ......................... 26
Table 11: Sales (in MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner. .......................... 27
Table 12: Connected Load (in kVA) as submitted by the Petitioner. ......... 27
Table 13: Number of Consumer as submitted by the Petitioner................ 27
Table 14: ARR (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner ......................... 28
Table 15: Sales (in MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner. .......................... 71
Table 16: Connected Load (kVA) as submitted by the Petitioner. ............. 72
Table 17: Number of Consumer (NOs) as submitted by the Petitioner. ..... 72
Table 18: Energy Sales (MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner and approved
by the Commission. .................................................................................... 73
Table 19: Energy Balance (in MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner........... 74
Table 20: Energy Balance (MUs) as approved by the Commission. ............ 76
Table 21: Power Procurement Cost (Rs. Cr.) as submitted by the
Petitioner. ................................................................................................... 77
Table 22: Renewable Purchase Obligation (in MUs) as approved by
Commission. ................................................................................................ 81
Table 23: Power Procurement Cost (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. ................................................................................................ 82
Table 24: Transmission Charge (in Rs Cr.) as submitted by Petitioner. .... 84
Table 25: Inter/Intra Transmission Charge (Rs. Cr.) as approved by
Commission. ................................................................................................ 84
Table 26: Actual Capital Expenditure (Rs. Crore) as submitted by
petitioner..................................................................................................... 84
Table 27: Actual capitalization (Rs Cr.) as submitted by the Petitioner. .. 85
Table 28: Capital Expenditure (Rs. Cr.) as approved by the Commission. 85
Table 29: Capitalization (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission. ....... 86
Table 30: Closing GFA (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission. .......... 86
Table 31: Consumer contribution and grants (Rs. Crore) as submitted by
the Petitioner. ............................................................................................. 87
Table 32: Consumer contribution and grants (Rs. Crore) as approved by
Commission. ................................................................................................ 89
Table 33: Source of funding of GFA (Rs Crore) as submitted by the
Petitioner. ................................................................................................... 90
Table 92: Return on Equity (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner... 146
Table 93: Return on Equity (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission. 146
Table 94: Interest on Working Capital (Rs Crore) as submitted by the
Petitioner. ................................................................................................. 147
Table 95: Interest on Working Capital (in Rs. Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 148
Table 96: Non-Tariff Income (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner. 149
Table 97: Non-Tariff Income (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission 150
Table 98: Disallowance Distribution Loss (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 152
Table 99: Revenue (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission. .............. 153
Table 100: Summary of ARR (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner 154
Table 101: Summary of ARR (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission.
................................................................................................................... 154
Table 102: Consumer Number, Connected Load, Energy Sales as submitted
by the Petitioner. ...................................................................................... 157
Table 103: Energy Sales as submitted by the Petitioner and approved by
the Commission. ....................................................................................... 158
Table 104: Connected Load (kVA) as submitted by the Petitioner and
approved by the Commission. .................................................................. 158
Table 105: Number of Consumer as submitted by the Petitioner and
approved by the Commission. .................................................................. 158
Table 106: Energy Balance (in MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner. ..... 160
Table 107: Energy Requirement (MUs) as approved by the Commission. 161
Table 108: Power Procurement Quantum and Cost as submitted by
Petitioner. ................................................................................................. 163
Table 109: Renewable Purchase Obligation (in Rs Crore) as submitted by
Petitioner. ................................................................................................. 165
Table 110: Renewable Purchase Obligation (Rs Crore) as approved by
Commission. .............................................................................................. 166
Table 111: Renewable Purchase Obligation as per RPO Regulation for FY
2024-25. .................................................................................................... 167
Table 112: Power Procurement Quantum and Cost as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 169
Table 113: Transmission Charge (in Rs Crore) as submitted by Petitioner.
................................................................................................................... 171
Table 114: Transmission Charge (in Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 171
Table 115: Estimated Scheme wise capital investment (in Rs Crore) as
submitted by the Petitioner...................................................................... 172
Table 116: Capital work in progress (Rs. Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 173
Table 117: Actual capitalization (in Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 173
Table 118: Consumer contribution and grants (Rs. Crore) as submitted by
petitioner. ................................................................................................. 173
Table 119: CCG (Rs. Crore) as approved by the Commission. ................. 174
Table 120: Source of funding of GFA ( in Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 174
Table 121: Employee cost (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner. .... 175
Table 122: A&G Expense (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner. ...... 175
Table 123: R&M Expenses (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner. .... 176
Table 124: Normative Employee Expenses (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 176
Table 125: Normative A&G Expenses (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 177
Table 126: Normative R&M Expenses (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 177
Table 127: Normative O&M Expenses (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 177
Table 128: Depreciation (in Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner.... 178
Table 129: Depreciation (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission. ..... 178
Table 130: Interest on Loan and Bank Charge (Rs. Crore) as submitted by
the Petitioner. ........................................................................................... 179
Table 131: Interest on Loan and Finance Charges (in Rs Crore) as approved
by the Commission. .................................................................................. 181
Table 132: Interest on CSD (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner. .. 181
Table 133: Interest on CSD (Rs. Crore) as approved by the Commission.182
Table 134: Return on Equity (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner. 183
Table 135: Return on Equity (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission.
................................................................................................................... 183
Table 136: Interest on Working Capital (Rs Crore) as submitted by the
Petitioner .................................................................................................. 184
Table 137: Interest on Working Capital (in Rs. Crore) as approved by the
Commission ............................................................................................... 184
Table 138: Non-Tariff Income (Rs Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner.
................................................................................................................... 185
Table 139: Non-Tariff Income (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission.
................................................................................................................... 186
Table 140: Disallowance Distribution Loss (Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 187
Table 141: Revenue (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission. ............ 187
Table 142: Summary of ARR (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the Petitioner.188
Table 143: Summary of ARR (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission.
................................................................................................................... 188
Table 144: Revenue Gap/(Surplus) (in Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission for FY 2024-25 at existing Tariff. ........................................ 190
Table 145: Accumulated Revenue Gap without carrying cost at proposed
Tariff for FY 2024-25. ............................................................................... 191
Table 146: Cumulative Gap/(Surplus) (in Rs Crore) as approved by the
Commission. .............................................................................................. 192
Table 147: Cumulative Gap/(Surplus) (in Rs Crore) as approved by the
BEFORE
Petition for
In the matter:
PRESENT
Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION
Jharkhand State Electricity Regulatory Commission
1.2 The Government of Jharkhand, vide its notification dated August 22,
2002, had defined the functions of JSERC as per Section 22 of the
Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 to be the following, namely:
(a) to determine the tariff for electricity, wholesale, bulk, grid or retail,
as the case may be, in the manner provided in Section 29;
(b) to determine the tariff payable for the use of transmission facilities
in the manner provided in Section 29;
1.3 After the Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) came
into force, the earlier Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 got
repealed and the functions of SERC’s are now defined under Section 86
of the Act.
1.4 In accordance with Section 86 (1) of the Act, the JSERC discharges the
following functions:
(f) adjudicate upon the disputes between the licensees and generating
companies; and to refer any dispute for arbitration;
(h) specify State Grid Code consistent with the Grid Code specified
under Clause (h) of sub-section (1) of Section 79;
1.5 The Commission has to also advise the State Government as per sub
section 2 of Section 86 of the Act, on all or any of the following matters,
namely:
1.6 The State Commission ensures transparency while exercising its powers
and discharging its functions.
1.7 In discharge of its functions, the State Commission is also guided by the
Tariff Policy notified by the Government of India under Section 3 of the
Act. The objectives of the Tariff Policy are to:
1.8 The erstwhile Jharkhand State Electricity Board (JSEB) was constituted
on March 10, 2001 under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 as a result of
the bifurcation of the erstwhile State of Bihar. Before that, the Bihar State
Electricity Board (BSEB) was the predominant entity entrusted with the
task of generating, transmitting and supplying power in the State.
1.9 The Energy Department, Government of Jharkhand, vide its Letter No.
1/Board-01-Urja-26/13-1745 dated June 28, 2013 unbundled the
erstwhile JSEB into following companies:
(a) Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (JUVNL) being the holding
company;
1.12 Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd was incorporated on October 23, 2013
with the Registrar of Companies, Jharkhand, Ranchi and obtained
1.15 The Petitioner in this Petition has made the following prayers before the
Commission:
(a) Admit the tariff and ARR Petition for FY 2024-25 accompanying
audited True-up for FY 2022-23 and APR for FY 2023-24 in
accordance with the JSERC (Terms and Conditions for
Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulations, 2020.
(b) Allow the Petitioner to add/ change / alter / modify this application
at a future date.
(e) To pass such Orders as deemed fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case in the interest of justice
2.2 The Commission had issued the MYT Order on June 21, 2017 for
Approval of Business Plan and ARR for MYT Control Period FY 2016-17
to FY 2020-21 and Retail Supply Tariff for FY 2016-17 under the
provisions of The ‘Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2015.
2.3 The Commission has issued the Tariff Order for JBVNL on February 28,
2019 on True-up for FY 2016-17 & FY 2017-18, Annual Performance
Review for FY 2018-19 and ARR & Tariff for FY 2019-20.
2.4 The Commission has carried out the True up for FY 2018-19, Annual
Performance Review for FY 2019-20, Annual Revenue Requirement and
Tariff Determination for FY 2020-21 vide its Order dated October 01,
2020.
2.5 The Commission had passed Order on True-up for FY 2019-20, APR for
FY 2020-21, Business Plan & MYT for Control Period from FY 2021-22 to
FY 2025-26 and Tariff for FY 2021-22.
2.6 The Commission had passed Order on True-up for FY 2020-21, APR for
FY 2021-22, and ARR for FY 2022-23 vide Order dated February 28,
2024.
2.7 The Commission had passed Order on True-up for FY 2021-22, APR for
FY 2022-23, ARR for FY 2023-24 vide Order dated February 28, 2024.
2.9 In response the Petitioner has asked to give time extension of 4 weeks
(i.e. till February 15, 2024).
2.10 On February 14, 2024, via letter no. 29, File No.
CE(C&R)/Rev/2485/2020/P-IV, the Petitioner has submitted additional
information related to the tariff proposal and tariff schedule for FY 2024-
25, along with prior period expenditures for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22,
based on the restated annual accounts for those years.
2.11 On February 21, 2024, via letter no. 10 of 2023/539 the Commission had
sent reminder to Petitioner pertaining to submission of reply to additional
data requirement as observed in the petition for True-up for FY 2022-23,
APR for FY 2023-24, ARR & Tariff for FY 2024-25.
2.13 With reference to MOP letter dated May 13, 2023 for determination of
Green Energy Tariff, this Commission sent letter to petitioner dated June
05, 2024 and July 19, 2024 to submit the proposal for Green Energy
Tariff for FY 2024-25.
2.14 Furthermore, the Commission vide letter no. JSERC/Case (Tariff) no.:10
of 2023/246 dated August 05, 2024 asked to submit reply of 2nd
discrepancies observed in petition for True-up of FY 2022-23, APR for FY
2023-24, ARR & Tariff for FY 2024-25 within two days. In reply to
discrepancies note the Petitioner vide letter no 193, file no.
CE(C&R)/Rev./2358/2019/P-II dated August 22, 2024 has submitted
the 2nd discrepancies reply.
2.17 The Commission has scrutinized the petition and the additional
data/information furnished by the Petitioner with respect to the
discrepancies identified and has considered the same while passing this
Order.
2.18 Based on the available facts and figure, the Commission vide letter no.
JSERC/Case (Tariff) No. 10 of 2023/569 dated February 26, 2024 has
directed the Petitioner to publish a Public Notice inviting
comments/suggestions from public and to make available the copies of
the petition to general public.
2.21 The Commission has convened a meeting of the State Advisory Committee
(SAC) on September 10, 2024 and prominently kept an agenda for
discussion on the Petitions filed by the Petitioner. The minutes of the SAC
meeting is attached as Annexure-1 to this Order.
2.22 The points discussed during the meeting and the suggestions made by
the members of the SAC have been duly considered by the Commission.
3.2 The following table below summarizes the actual energy sales, connected
Load and number of consumer for FY 2022-23 as submitted by the
Petitioner against the sales approved in Tariff Order dated February 28,
2024.
Energy Sales
3.4 The following table below summarizes the estimated energy sales,
connected Load and Number of consumer for FY 2023-24 as submitted
by the Petitioner against the sales approved in Tariff Order dated
February 28, 2024.
Energy Sales
3.6 The following table below summarizes the projected energy sales,
connected load and number of consumers for FY 2024-25 as submitted
by the Petitioner against the sales approved in Order dated May 31, 2023.
4.2 The comments and suggestions of the public along with the response of
the Petitioner and the views of the Commission are summarized in this
Chapter. The issues raised by the stakeholders, which do not hold
relevance to True-up, APR, and ARR & Tariff have not been discussed in
this Chapter.
a) Audit Report
4.3 The Objector has submitted that the Petitioner has not been managing
the Books of Accounts in a manner as required under the provisions of
the Companies Act 2013. This has been prevalent since earlier years also.
The Statutory Auditors of the company have in the FY 2020-21 also
recorded weaknesses in respect of the company’s financial reporting.
4.4 It has also submitted that the comments from the Statutory Auditor in the
Auditor’s report paints a sorry picture on the state of affairs in the JBVNL.
Such lackluster performance wrt maintenance of company’s financials
could have a significant bearing on the ARR claimed by the DISCOMs year
on year basis.
Petitioner Submission
company has put immense efforts to maintain the records and to ensure
the availability of data/ records, this can also be evident from the Qualified
opinion/comments of the statutory auditors in their Statutory Audit
report in FY. 2022- 2023. The Management of the company trying hard to
put all effort to bring further improvement and positive changes in the
preparation of quality of accounts.
4.6 The Petitioner has submitted that it has comply with the requirements of
proper maintenance of books and records the company has already
worked towards implementation of SAP-ERP. This will fill the remaining
gaps and allow us to maintain records electronically and also ensure
compliances. Further it has submitted that they tnow at the transition
phase of implementation of the ERP.
4.7 The Objector state that the preparation of Fixed Asset register is necessity
of the time. In this regard, the Objector prayed to Hon’ble Commission
directed the Licensee to maintain Fixed Asset Register, the Licensee has
not been complied to the same. The Licensee must be penalized in lieu of
such non-compliance.
4.8 The Hon’ble Commission should also direct the Petitioner to prepare
Regulatory Accounts in consonance with the Standardization of
Regulatory Accounts Final Report dated July 2012 issued by the Forum
of Regulators so as to harmonize the Accounts that shall enable the
Hon’ble Commission to conduct the True-up with standardized approach.
Petitioner Submission
4.9 The substantial amount of assets has been added post formation of the
company i.e. after 06.01.2014 and such additions have been duly audited
by the respective year auditors. The company has sufficient records in
respect of the assets so added in respective years. In order to further
improve, the company has appointed M/s Deloitte for physical verification
and preparation of Fixed Asset Register and the work has already reached
to the advanced stage wherein draft reports for few locations have been
provided for review and correction
4.10 The company is registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (now
Companies Act, 2013) and prepares books as per the relevant provisions
of the Act. Further, as per the relevant provisions of the Act, the books so
prepared will be given to the independent Auditor appointed by C & AG. If
directed, the company will put an effort to prepare Regulatory Accounts
as well.
4.11 It is noteworthy that despite capitalizing nearly 25% of the Capex during
FY 2021-22, Distribution losses have paradoxically increased by over
2.8%.
4.12 Secondly, the Para 4 of the Basis of Qualified Opinion as per Independent
Auditor’s Report appended to the Audited Accounts of the FY 2022-23
provides as under:
4. CWIP
4.13 Based on the above, it is evident that the employee expenses recorded in
the Profit and Loss (P&L) statement also include expenses related to
capital works. This approach by the Petitioner is misleading, to say the
least. Employee expenses associated with capital works should be
allocated to the capital cost, ensuring that the entire employee expenses
are not incorrectly included in the P&L statement. This practice has been
ongoing in previous years, indicating that the distribution companies have
not adequately addressed the Auditor’s remarks.
4.14 In the absence of detailed information and in accordance with the above
points, the Objector suggests that employee expenses recoverable through
the Annual Revenue Requirement (ARR) under the Operations &
Maintenance (O&M) head should be allocated based on the pro-rata
balances of Capital Work in Progress (CWIP) and Gross Fixed Assets
(GFA).
Petitioner Submission
4.15 The Petitioner has apprised that the benefits of any major expenditure of
capital nature requires time to be visible and cannot produce immediate
results. The Petitioner has expected that the benefits will be repelled due
course of time and projections are made accordingly.
4.16 It has been informed that the company is operating with limited number
of resources as against the approved levels. In such a scenario, the
employees do multitasking and carry out activities of projects and revenue
simultaneously. In such a scenario, it is operationally very difficult to
allocate the overhead costs to assets. Further, it also informed that the
significant cost (more than 90%) of the company is made up of Power
purchase cost, Depreciation and Finance cost. Such allocation, if tried,
will not have significant impact in the overall reduction in cost and will
further be apportioned to depreciation cost over a period of time.
4.17 The company however, is still working on this area and may be able to
work out a policy after the FA Register is prepared for proper accounting
and allocation.
4.18 The Petitioner has claimed expenses towards Terminal benefits amounting
to Rs. 218.11 Crore based on certain Expenses booked in the Audited
Accounts. The Tariff Regulations 2020 in respect of Terminal Benefits
provides as under:
4.19 In accordance with the above, the liability towards Terminal benefits is
admissible based on either of:
4.20 At the outset, the Objector has submitted that the Petitioner has not
submitted the Actuarial valuation report along with the instant Petition
which is the quintessential requirement as per the Tariff Regulations
2020.
4.21 Secondly, the actual amount paid/ deposited in the Trust fund is also not
provided by the Licensee. JBVNL has merely depicted the provisions
towards Trust fund towards Terminal liabilities while the Regulations
provide for Terminal benefits based on actual amount. Furthermore, the
claim made JBVNL is inconsistent with the provisions towards terminal
benefits booked in the Audited Accounts.
4.24 The company has reported its employee benefits provision and plan assets
separately (on a gross basis), which does not comply with Ind AS 19
“Employee Benefits.” This standard requires the net amount (the
difference between the provision and plan assets) to be disclosed in
financial statements. By showing such figures, the company’s financial
statements do not accurately reflect its obligations and resources,
potentially misleading its financial position. Notably, in the past as well,
4.25 Based on the above excerpts, it could be observed that the Petitioner has
not been depositing in actual, any amount towards terminal benefits
(albeit on a regular basis). The above means to say that although the
expenses towards terminal fund contribution is shown as part of P&L, the
same has not been deposited in Trust funds.
4.27 In view of the above arguments, the claim of Rs. 218.11 Crore towards
Terminal Liabilities is not admissible as per the Tariff Regulations 2020.
The Objector submits that in the absence of substantiating information
on record, the Contribution towards Terminal Benefits may not be
admitted at this point of time for the period FY 2022-23 to FY 2024-25.
Petitioner Submission
4.28 The Petitioner had been making provisions as per the rates prescribed in
the Actuarial Valuation report of the F.Y. 2013-14 which is lower than the
actual rates, thereby claiming lower admin expenses. The Petitioner had
carried out the Actuarial Valuations for subsequent period up-to FY 2017-
18, however, the report only contained the figures of obligations.
Accordingly, the company only accounted for the liability in the F.Y. 2018-
19, without accounting for corresponding amount of contribution as an
expense.
4.29 During the F.Y. 2022-23, the company carried out the Actuarial
Valuations through an Actuary for the F.Y. 2018-19 to 2022-23, which
were pending for long time and the impact of the same has been accounted
for in the F.Y. 2022-23. So, the terminal benefit costs are on actual as per
the Actuarial Report.
4.30 The company has made detailed disclosure regarding this in its audited
accounts in Note 2.5: terminal benefits.
4.31 The company has been regular in depositing the contribution amount
relating GPF, GSS, Leave Encashment, Gratuity etc
4.32 The Petitioner has claimed Capitalization of Rs. 1,607.69 Crore for the FY
2022-23 in line with the Audited Accounts. Further, the Petitioner has
considered additions of Grants (and Consumer Contribution) amounting
to Rs. 362.27 Crore based on the actual Capital Grants received and
adjusting for Amortization of the Grants.
4.33 At the outset, the approach of the Petitioner is incorrect as the admission
of Interest expenses and Depreciation is based on the Capital Cost net off
grants and consumer contribution. The provisions of the Tariff
Regulations 2020 also align with the above approach. The extracts of the
Tariff Regulations 2020 are as follows:
…………………………….
……………………………
Depreciation
4.34 Based on the above, it is clear that the Depreciation, Interest on Loan are
to be admitted on the Capital Cost net off grants. However, the Petitioner
has netted off the grant component by adjusting the amortization towards
grants as well which is not in line with the Tariff Regulations 2020.
Note:
4.36 Likewise, the Consumer Contribution claimed by JBVNL (Rs. 53.38 Crore)
for FY 2022-23 is inconsistent with the amount booked in the Audited
Accounts. Note 20: Other Current Financial Liabilities of the Audited
Accounts depict that the additions to consumer contributions is Rs. 79.10
Crore computed as a difference between Opening and closing Receipts
under Deposit Head.
4.37 In line with the above extract from the Audited Accounts, the Hon’ble
Commission is sincerely requested to consider Rs. 1,139.24 Crore (Rs.
1,060.14 + 79.10 Crore) towards Contribution for Grants/ Consumer
Contribution/ Deposit works.
4.38 Based on the above findings, the Objector prayed to consider Rs. 1,139.24
Crore towards Contribution Contribution/ Grants for the computation of
Depreciation, Interest on Loan and Return on Equity.
Petitioner Submission
4.39 The Petitioner has submitted that the objector, while making a co-relation
between amount capitalized through Grants/ Consumer Contribution/
Deposit works and the figures quoted w.r.t Property Plant & Equipment,
Depreciation and Grants and Subsidy, completely ignored the fact that: -
4.40 The Objector has submitted that as per the Audited Accounts of FY 2022-
23, there is a substantial difference in the opening balance of CWIP of FY
2022-23 vs the closing balance of the FY 2021-22 (ref Audited Accounts
for FY 2021-22). The Petitioner has not provided any documentary
evidence to substantiate such deviation in the CWIP balances. The
petitioner has not exhibited any documentary evidence in support of the
such deviation
4.41 Partly completed works are moved to GFA account possible indicating that
the GFA balances are over-inflated. The above considerations have serious
implications as far as Tariff determination exercise is concerned. Hon’ble
Commission is sincerely requested to kindly direct the Licensee to prepare
the Fixed Asset Register which shall duly record the details associated
with asset capitalization or else impose penalty in addition to the currently
applicable penalty at 2% of the ARR. Such an approach would be in the
long term interest of the consumers and Licensee at large.
“4. CWIP
4.44 Additionally, the Objector has submitted that since the scheme wise
details of Capex projections made by the Licensee does not hold sufficient
ground, the projections of capital grants may be considered as projected
by the Licensee. In so far as the projections of consumer contribution/
deposit works is concerned, the Petitioner has failed to provide any logical
rationale, therefore, the consumer contribution as admissible for FY 2022-
23 (Rs. 79.10 Crore) must be considered for the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-
25 as well.
Petitioner Submission
4.46 Scheme wise details of almost 95% of the value of CWIP was provided as
per the report which is quite significant.
g) Depreciation
4.48 The Petitioner has claimed Rs. 509.68 Crore towards Depreciation for the
FY 2022-23 considering the Rate of depreciation of 4.50%.
4.49 The Petitioner has submitted that it has considered the Rate of
depreciation based on the Weighted Average Rate of depreciation as per
the Accounts. However, it is notable to point out that the Asset-wise Rate
of depreciation computed by the Petitioner is based on the opening value
of Asset base booked in the Accounts and not on the average value of the
Asset base. It is rather more compelling to argue that since the
depreciation is being allowed on the average asset base, the rate of
depreciation should also be accordingly determined.
4.51 In line with the admissible GFA, Consumer contribution & Grants and the
Rate of Depreciation as discussed in preceding paras, the allowable
Depreciation for the FY 2022- 23 is as Rs 412.29 crore.
4.52 The Petitioner has claimed Rs. 553.89 Crore and Rs. 609.07 Crore towards
Depreciation for the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 respectively considering
the Rate of depreciation of 4.50%.
4.53 As argued in the True up chapter (in preceding sections), the Petitioner’s
consideration of the Rate of depreciation based on the Audited Accounts
(for FY 2022-23) is incorrect. It is notable to point out that the Asset-wise
Rate of depreciation computed by the Petitioner is based on the opening
value of Asset base booked in the Accounts and not on the average value
of the Asset base. It is compelling to argue that since the depreciation is
being allowed on the average asset base, the rate of depreciation should
also be accordingly determined.
4.54 The allowable rate of depreciation based on the Audited Accounts for the
FY 2022-23 as per the Objector’s assessment is 4.42% which should be
considered in the absence of Audited Accounts for FY 2023-24 and FY
2024-25; The computation of Rate of depreciation is given in main
submission.
Petitioner Submission
4.55 The Petitioner took a notice of the depreciation rates as per JSERC (Terms
and Conditions for Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulations, 2020
vide notification no. 570 dated 12th Novemnber-2020 which was effective
from 1st April, 2021, while preparing the accounts for the F.Y. 2022-23 on
its own, which was inadvertently missed in the F.Y. 2021-22. The impact
of such corrections was considered while preparing the accounts for the
F.Y. 2022-23. A suitable disclosure in this respect is also given in the
Notes to Accounts of the said period.
h) Interest on Loan
4.56 The Petitioner has claimed Rs. 420.69 Crore towards Interest on Loan for
the FY 2022-23 considering the Rate of Interest of 9.10%. 5.7.2. In line
with the admissible GFA and the Consumer contribution & Grants, the
allowable Interest on Loan for the FY 2022-23 as Rs 376.07 crore
4.57 The Petitioner has also claimed Bank charges to the tune of approx. Rs.
11 Crore which in the opinion of the Petitioner is significantly high. The
actual Bank charges for the FY 2021- 22 were Rs. 0.49 Crore. The
Petitioner has not exhibited any rationale for such significant increase in
Bank charges therefore, the Objector humbly submits that the Hon’ble
Commission may kindly approve bank Charges to the tune of Rs. 0.49
Crore for FY 2022-23.
Petitioner Submission
4.58 The Objector, while making a co-relation between the interest cost and
bank charges, completely ignored the fact that while the bank charges
increased by Rs. 10.5 Cr, the Interest cost on working capital reduced
significantly by Rs 59.86 Cr. The details of bank charges were submitted
earlier also which is mainly includes amount paid against bill discounting,
LC charges, annual maintenance charges etc. levied by banks on working
capital loan limits
4.59 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
a) Energy Balance
4.60 In table 2-4 of the True- up: Energy Balance for JBVNL for FY 2022-23,
Transmission Loss is 8.46%. This is much higher than the average inter-
state loss calculation of 3.00% as approved by the Hon’ble Commission.
Industry standard and a deep dent.
Petitioner Submission
4.61 The Petitioner has submitted that, the complete loss calculation at Inter
State, at JUSNL and at DVC network has been submitted to Commission
based on actual energy drawl at distribution periphery based on ABT
meter reading. The interstate transmission loss has been calculated as
3%, transmission loss at JUSNL network as 7.06% and transmission loss
at DVC network as 3.85%. JBVNL.
b) Distribution Loss
4.62 The Objector submitted that the distribution Loss is pegged at 30.28%.
The above losses are the only reason for tariff hike requirement and if the
same is controlled, tariff hike will not be required as Losses as a ratio of
revenue is also around 35% - 40%, which is in sync with the T&D losses.
Petitioner Submission
4.63 The Petitioner has submitted that, the actual distribution loss for FY
4.64 The proposed tariff hike is to meet the aggregate revenue requirement of
JBVNL and to meet the gap created in the past years due to delayed/non-
revision of tariff. Thus, JBVNL, requests the Hon'ble Commission to
consider the proposed tariff revision for FY 2024-25.
c) Capital Expenditure
4.65 All the initiatives and capital expense they have done or planned to do to
arrest the T&D losses? Is there any plan to control these losses?
Petitioner Submission
4.66 The Petitioner has submitted that, the capital expenses being done in
various schemes are to meet the increasing demand of the consumers and
provide 24x7 quality and reliable power to all in the State.
Dashboard for single platform for monitoring and payment (only for
lower consumers)
Feeder Separation
d) T&D Loss
4.68 As per general statistics available, Jharkhand is the highest in T&D losses
amongst Indian states. Is there any particular reason for the same or it is
due to poor operations by JBVNL?
Petitioner Submission
4.69 The Petitioner has denied the fact that, Jharkhand has highest in T&D
losses in India. The same can be checked from performance reports of
state power utilities of PFC. The reasons for T&D losses are -
4.70 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
Petitioner Submission
4.71 The Petitioner has submitted that, the proposed hike in the tariff is as per
the tariff policy reflecting the cost of supply and to zero down the gap of
ACS and ABR. Thus, Commission is requested to approve the proposed
hike in tariff to eliminate the revenue gap created during the years on
petitioner.
Petitioner Submission
4.72 JBVNL hereby submits that, the Smart Meter is being properly checked
and tested in the authorized lab before installation. Also, JBVNL is in the
process of appointment of agencies for the third-party testing of smart
meters. In any case if, there is fault in any meter installed, JBVNL ensures
to check and identify fault in the meter and provide the resolution to the
consumers at earliest.
Petitioner Submission
Petitioner Submission
Petitioner Submission
4.75 The Petitioner has denied the claim of the stakeholder. As, there the
monthly billing system implemented by JBVNL in the State, thus, bills are
Petitioner Submission
4.76 The subsidy being provided to the consumers in the State is a subject of
State Government. Thus, JBVNL does not have any role in providing of
implementation of subsidy to the consumers.
4.77 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
Petitioner Submission
4.78 The Petitioner has submitted that, the Tariff Petition for True Up of FY
2022-23. APR of FY 2023-24 and ARR for FY 2024-25 was filed before the
Commission on 30th November 2023. The Retail Tariff Proposal along with
the Additional submission on Restated Account for FY 2020-21 and FY
2021-22 was submitted to the Commission on 14th February 2024. The
same can also be found on JBVNL's website.
4.79 Further, JBVNL prayed to the Commission to upload the complete petition
on its website for the access to all the stakeholders.
Petitioner Submission
4.80 The Petitioner has submitted that, it has published a Public Notice on 14
March 2024 on its website and on 16 March 2024 in newspaper (Two
Hindi and Two English) inviting Comments/Suggestion on Tariff Petition
filed by JBVNL.
Petitioner Submission
4.81 The Petitioner has denied the claim of the stakeholder. The Petitioner
further clarifies that, the petition along with the Tariff Proposal has been
submitted in line to the JSERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination
of Distribution Tariff) Regulations, 2020.
4.82 In addition to that, JBVNL has also submitted reply to the queries raised
by the Commission dated 18 January 2024 and 05 August 2024 and 13
August 2024. The stakeholders may refer those replies and submission
for further clarification.
Petitioner Submission
4.83 The Petitioner has clarified that, the Tariff Petition for True Up of FY 2022-
23, APR of FY 2023-24 and ARR for FY 2024-25 was filed before the
Commission on 30th November 2023 within the timeline as per the JSERC
(Terms and Conditions for Determination of Distribution Tariff)
Regulations, 2020. Further, the Commission may clarify on the concern
of the stakeholder.
Petitioner Submission
4.84 The Petitioner again clarifies that, it has submitted queries raised by the
Commission dated 18 January 2024 and 05 August 2024 and 13 August
2024. JBVNL prayed to upload the same on its website for further access
to stakeholders.
Petitioner Submission
4.85 The Petitioner has clarified that the petition has been submitted in
accordance with the clauses of the JSERC (Terms and Conditions for
Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulations, 2020, showing all the
Petitioner Submission
4.86 The Petitioner has clarified that, framework for filing of True Up, APR and
ARR petition in JSERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of
Distribution Tariff) Regulations. 2020 expresses to show the components
of ARR which are affecting the revenue and expenses of the utility.
4.87 JBVNL also states that, any amount received by the Govt. of Jharkhand
under free electricity scheme has already been included in the revenue of
DISCOM and the same can be checked in the Annual Account of JBVNL
for FY 2022-23.
Petitioner Submission
4.88 Details of category wise energy sales has been shown in the petition under
table no. 2.1 of the petition.
i) Theft
Petitioner Submission
4.89 Details of theft for 202.45 MU has been submitted to the Commission via
letter No. 194 dated 22.08.2024. The same can be sought from the
Commission.
Petitioner Submission
4.90 The Petitioner has submitted that it has firm allocations of power from
central allocations like NTPC, NHPC, DVC and other sources such as
TVNL, DVC(STOA), PTC etc. In addition to these, JBVNL has also
purchased power from private stations like APNRL, Inland Power, and
some quantum from renewable sources during FY 2022-23.
4.91 Also, the petitioner humbly submits that it is not in favor of any short-
term power procurement and thus, it does not have any rolling quarterly
forecast of the quantum of short-term power to be purchased. The short-
term power is purchased on day ahead basis when the need arises such
as shutdown of any units from generating stations or in emergency
situations when the demand is more than the scheduled supply. The
JBVNL purchased power from IEX on day ahead basis and sometimes it
procured power from the real time market (RTM) basis.
4.92 JBVNL, doesn't deviate from its schedule deliberately. At all times it is
endeavor of JBVNL that its schedule is same as its drawl and hence there
should be no UI Purchase/UI sales ideally. Even if the deviation occurs
there is equivalent probability of happening it on either side of scheduled
quantity.
4.93 Similarly, JBVNL has adequate capacity contracted from power plants and
need not procure short-term power plant in natural course of business.
However, often due to sudden tripping of generating units and revision of
injection schedule of RE generators, JBVNL faces shortage of power, and
it is forced to purchase power from power exchange. Similarly, if JBVNL
envisages that it has optimum capacity available in any time block as
compared to its demand and it can sell the power profitably after
considering, Energy Charge of the plant or to maintain DSM, it bids the
power for sale in power exchange. Both the activities are randomized and
it's not possible to predict quantum of energy purchased/sold from Power
Exchange in advance.
4.94 The same can be verified from the obligation report from PXIL and EX as
submitted to the Commission.
4.95 Thus, the actual cost of power procured may be allowed to the petitioner.
Petitioner Submission
4.96 JBVNL, denies the claim of stakeholder. Till now, JBVNL has given NOC
to 250 consumers with the cumulative capacity of 1003.97 kW for solar
rooftop installation. Also, 5000 applications have been received in PM
surya Ghar Yojana for rooftop installation. Also, online billing software
has been prepared and will be functional in a short span of time.
l) Transmission Loss
Petitioner Submission
m) Distribution Loss
Petitioner Submission
4.98 The actual AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 was 29.79%. Under RDSS scheme
the target of AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 for Jharkhand was 30%. It is seen
that, the actual AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 is less than the target set for
FY 2022-23. AT&C Loss trajectory approved by MOP has already been
submitted to the Commission.
4.99 In accordance with same, the distribution loss for FY 2022-23 is coming
out to be 30.28%. The JBVNL has taken several steps to reduce the
distribution loss by conducting several raids and lodging FIRs against the
errant consumer and action had been taken regularly.
4.100 Distribution loss for FY 2021-22 was 33.18%. JBVNL has made progress
in minimizing distribution loss as compared to FY 2021-22 and working
continuously towards improving the system performance. In addition to
that Prepaid meter installation work in progress which will help in
reducing the distribution losses of JBVNL.
4.101 Thus, JBVNL requests the Commission to allow the claimed distribution
loss as arrived in accordance with the allowed trajectory under RDSS
scheme.
Petitioner Submission
4.102 The CCG has been filed on the normative basis. Thus, opening of FY 2022-
23 has been considered as closing of FY 2021-22 as filed in true up
petition of FY 2021-22.
Petitioner Submission
Petitioner Submission
4.104 AT&C Loss- The AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 has been estimated as 24% in
accordance with the targets set under RDSS scheme. The distribution loss
for FY 2022-23 was 30.28% and for FY 2021-22 was 18%. The JBVNL,
has taken several steps to reduce the distribution loss by conducting
several raids and lodging FIRS against the errant consumers and actions
had been taken regularly. JBVNL has made progress in minimizing
distribution loss as compared to FY 2021-22 and working continuously
towards improving the system performance, in addition to that, Prepaid
meter installation work in progress which will help in reducing the
distribution losses of JBVNL. Thus, JBVNL requests the Hon'ble
Commission to allow the claimed distribution loss as arrived in
accordance with the allowed trajectory under RDSS scheme.
4.105 Power Purchase – the Petitioner has submitted that, it has firm
allocations of power from central allocations like NTPC, NHPC, DVC and
other sources such as TVNL, DVC(STOA), PTC etc. In addition to these,
JBVNL has also purchased power from private stations like APNRL, Inland
Power, and some quantum from renewable sources during FY 2022-23.
4.106 Also, the petitioner humbly submits that it is not in favor of any short-
term power procurement and thus, it does not have any rolling quarterly
forecast of the quantum of short-term power to be purchased. The short-
term power is purchased on day ahead basis when the need arises such
as shutdown of any units from generating stations or in emergency
situations when the demand is more than the scheduled supply. The
JBVNL. purchased power from IEX on day ahead basis and sometimes it
procured power from the real time market (RTM) basis.
4.107 JBVNL doesn't deviate from its schedule deliberately. At all times it is
endeavor of JBVNL. that it is same as its drawl and hence there should be
no Ul Purchase/UI sales ideally. Even if the deviation there is equivalent
probability of happening it on either side of scheduled quantity.
4.108 Similarly, JBVNL has adequate capacity contracted from power plants and
need not procure short term power plant in natural course of business.
However, often due to sudden tripping of generating units and revision of
injection schedule of RE generators, JBVNL, faces shortage of power, and
it is forced to purchase power from power exchange. Similarly, if JBVNL
envisages that it has optimum capacity available in any time block as
compared to its demand and it can sell the power profitably after
considering Energy Charge of the plant or to maintain DSM, it bids the
power for sale in power exchange. Both the activities are randomized and
it's not possible to predict quantum of energy purchased/sold from Power
Exchange in advance.
4.109 The same can be verified from the obligation report from PXIL and IEX as
submitted to the Commission. Thus, the actual cost of power procured
may be allowed to the petitioner.
4.110 New North Karanpura- The per unit rate for New North Karnapura has
been considered same as the per unit rate for North Karnapura for
projection of FY 2023-24.
4.111 Power Purchase Cost & Quantum-JBVNL refuses the submission of the
stakeholder for consideration of power purchase cost and quantum as per
"JSERC (Terms and conditions for determination of distribution tariff)
4.112 Also, the estimation of sale and purchase of power from IEX/PXIL. for FY
2023-24 has been considered as actual sale and purchase of power from
IEX/PXIL in first six months of the year without considering any
escalation. The same can be verified from the obligation report of IEX and
PXIL.
4.113 Solar Net Metering - JBVNL. denies the claim of stakeholder. Till now,
JBVNL. has given NOC to 250 consumers with the cumulative capacity of
1003.97 kw for solar rooftop installation. Also, 5000 applications have
been received in PM Surya Ghar Yojana for rooftop installation. Also,
online billing software has been prepared and will be functional in a short
span of time.
4.115 AT&C Loss- The proposed AT&C losses for FY 2023-24 is in line with the
approved losses by MOP in the RDSS trajectory. Thus, JBVNL requests
the Commission to allow the AT&C loss in accordance with the same.
4.116 Feeder & DT Metering - JBVNL denies the claim of stakeholder for not
showing the commitment to improve the efficiency and honor the
commitment. JBVNL is working on the ROSS Scheme, in which 100% DT
metering and consumer indexing will be done in the state. The process to
award the work is already in process and expected to be completed in 2
years of span.
4.117 Higher AT&C Loss-GOJ is providing subsidy to consumers and the same
has been reflected in the Annual Accounts of JBVNL. Further, the losses
are due to Low HT/LT ratio: 0.3675 (36.75%). The low ratio of HT/LT is
due to extensive electrification by JBVNL for various schemes such as
DDUGJY, SAUBHAGYA, RGGVY, IPDS, UDAY, in far flung areas that are
Scattered in nature, mostly tribal and village dominated and marginal
areas with poor affordability.
Petitioner Submission
4.119 Distribution Loss - The proposed AT&C losses for FY 2023-24 is in line
with the approved losses by MOP in the RDSS trajectory. Thus, JBVNL
requests the Commission to allow the AT&C loss in accordance with the
same.
4.120 Terms & Supply of Charges - JBVNL submitted Terms of Supply and
schedule of charges along with the Tariff for FY 2021-25 has been
submitted to the Commission dated 14.02.2024. The same is available on
the website of JBVNL
Petitioner Submission
4.123 Regarding CTU Loss of 3% and transmission loss of 8.46%- JBVNL has
submitted that, the claimed CTU loss and transmission losses are passed
on to distribution utilities which is further to be passed on to the
consumers through tariff:
4.124 Fixed Charge on kW basis for Domestic Category - The reason for
proposing fixed charge on load basis for domestic connections have been
elaborated in the tariff proposal as submitted by JBVNL. The same is
being reiterated herewith for your reference as;
4.126 Thus, JBVNL hereby requests the Hon'ble Commission to allow the tariff
as proposed in the petition.
4.127 Street Light Connection – Petitioner has submitted that, it is making its
best effort to meter all the streetlights, that due to some operational
4.129 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
Petitioner Submission
4.130 The Petitioner has submitted that, the mechanism to recover the fixed cost
and energy cost is as per the two-part tariff mechanism as per the Tariff
Policy. Also JBVNL denies the claim of stakeholder that there no
expansion of network utility in the Jharkhand.
Petitioner Submission
4.132 Currently feeder separation is being done. Once the Feeder separation is
complete the benefit of reduction on Fixed Charge will be passed on the
Consumers
Petitioner Submission
4.133 The Petitioner has submitted that the status of all the directive given by
the Commission in the Tariff Order dated May 31, 2023 has been
submitted to the Commission in its Tariff Petition.
4.134 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
4.135 The amount of tariff was possibly revised erroneously too high to the
monopolistic trade malpractice so there was consideration of subsidy for
consumers to pay tariff @ Rs 4.20 per unit. Thereafter some restrictions
were imposed on consumption of power arbitrarily that malign the
constitutional right of equality granted in the article 14 of the constitution
Petitioner Submission
4.137 Subsidy-There has been gross loss on part of the management of JBVNL
to have made clear in the order to loss of subsidy only on the amount of
consumption power beyond 400 units to avert the act of discrimination
much tells upon the credence of RSER commission
Petitioner Submission
4.139 Tariff-That there could have been criteria for tariff revision periodically.
The criteria of deciding tariff per unit must base on the cost of power
purchase and other allied expenditure on infrastructure otherwise there
shall be an act of monopoly trade of mal-practice.
Petitioner Submission
4.140 The Petitioner has submitted that tariff filing each year by November 31
by the state distribution company is mandated by the Hon’ble
Commission. The Hon’ble Commission after prudence check of all data
and information provided by the state distribution company and public
hearing, will pass the order within 120 days of the petition.
4.141 Yes, the Hon’ble Commission decides on the tariff after prudence check of
all expenditure including power purchase cost and other infrastructure.
4.142 The regulatory commission may kindly take all points into his
consideration to revise the tariff to lower amount of consumers on
consideration of the following point
Petitioner Submission
Petitioner Submission
4.145 Rs 154 in the bill as claimed is electricity duty as applicable by the state
govt, DPS charge is delay payment surcharge on the consumer for the bill
not paid in full within a certain time and FPPA surcharge is the Fuel and
4.146 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
Petitioner Submission
4.147 Regarding Tariff Submission - JBVNL hereby clarifies that, the Tariff
Petition for True Up of FY 2022-23, APR of FY 2023-24 and ARR for FY
2024-25 was filed before the Commission on 30th November 2023. The
Retail Tariff Proposal along with the Additional submission on Restated
Account for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22 was submitted to the
Commission on 14th February 2024. The same can also be found on
JBVNL's website. Also, the proposed hike in the tariff is as per the tariff
policy reflecting the cost of supply and to zero down the gap of ACS and
ABR. Thus, Commission is requested to approve the proposed hike in tariff
to eliminate the revenue gap created during the years on JBVNL
ii. Delay in Tariff Order - JBVNL hereby clarifies that, the Tariff
Petition for True Up of FY 2022- 23. APR of FY 2023-24 and ARR
for FY 2024-25 was filed before the Commission on 30th November
2023 within the timeline as per the JSERC (Terms and Conditions
for Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulations, 2020.
Further, the Commission may clarify on the concern of the
stakeholder.
4.149 AT&C Loss- The actual AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 was 29.79%. Under
RDSS scheme the target of AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 for Jharkhand was
30%. It is seen that, the actual AT&C loss for FY 2022-23 is less than the
target set for FY 2022-23. AT&C Loss trajectory approved by MOP has
already been submitted to the Commission.
4.150 In accordance with same, the distribution loss for FY 2022-23 is coming
out to be 30.28%. The JBVNL has taken several steps to reduce the
distribution loss by conducting several raids and lodging FIRs against the
errant consumers and actions had been taken regularly.
4.151 Distribution loss for FY 2021-22 was 33.18%. JBVNL has made progress
in minimizing distribution loss as compared to FY 2021-22 and working
continuously towards improving the system performance. In addition to
that. Prepaid meter installation work in progress which will help in
reducing the distribution losses of JBVNL. Thus, JBVNL requests the
Commission to allow the claimed distribution loss as arrived in
accordance with the allowed trajectory under RDSS scheme.
4.154 Fixed Charge in Domestic Consumer- JBVNL hereby submits that, the
rationale for introducing fixed charge based on sanctioned load is many
fold. Firstly, the consumer should be aware about the tools and appliances
in its premises and the energy consumption and usage pattern of such
appliances so that he/she can effectively plan for energy consumption and
its timing. Also, with smart meter implementation in Ranchi, it was found
that the maximum demand recorded in the meter is way above the
contracted demand of many consumers. Thus, fixed charge based on the
contracted load would help the utility for better power procurement
strategy and overall, would lead to energy conservation.
4.155 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
4.156 Objector- The complete set of petitions was not available to the public on
the website of JBVNL.
4.157 Petitioner Submission- The complete petition was available in the JBVNL’s
website along with gist, audited account, tariff petition and revised
statements. The same can be accessed through
4.158 Objector-The last date of giving comments and suggestions on the tariff
petition was 08.04.2024but the petition was made available to public on
16.08.2024
4.159 Petitioner- The allegation of the consumer is not correct. The petition was
available on the JBVNL’s website. The consumer might have missed the
link to the document.
4.160 Objector- The figure submitted was based on the estimates of FY23-24
4.161 Petitioner- We would like to reiterate that the current petition under
consideration is for true up of FY22-23, APR for FY23-24 and ARR for
FY24-25. The APR figures are based on the data available at the filing of
the petition and projected for the complete FY23-24. The confusion arises
because of delay in hearing of the petition by the Commission. It is to be
noted that the Hon’ble commission was clearing the backlogs of the
previous petitions and thus, the delay was inevitable.
4.164 Objector- The petition does not contain information about revenue from
free electricity scheme of govt of Jharkhand, no of consumers benefited,
amount billed to such consumers, amount receive from Govt of
Jharkhand etc.
4.165 Petitioner- The free electricity scheme of govt of Jharkhand is under the
subsidy provided by the GOJ. The subsidy is part of the revenue collected
from the consumers, though billed to consumers but collected as subsidy
from the GOJ. The subsidy details can be found out from the audited
accounts report as quarterly subsidy was raised to GOJ.
4.166 Objector- Energy sales from THEFT for FY22-23 was 202.45MU. No
details are available for the same in petition.
4.167 Petitioner- Energy sales from theft is coming from the FIRs lodged by
JBVNL to the erring consumers and assessment made against the units
booked. The assessment realized against the units are calculated as
energy sales under THEFT category as energy realized.
4.169 Petitioner- These parameters are part of the models that was being
prepared for the petitions and duly provided to the Hon’ble commission
for prudence check.
4.170 Objector- AT&C Loss FY21-22 (27.45%), FY22-23 (30.28%), FY23-24 (not
available) High AT&C loss is due to large scattered rural consumers of
Jharkhand.
4.171 Petitioner- The consumer might have erred in taking the AT&C for FY21-
22 as 27.45%. The FY21-22 (27.45%), FY22-23 (30.28%), FY23-24 (not
available) High AT&C loss is due to large scattered rural consumers of
Jharkhand. figure for FY21-22 was 33.18%. There is considerable overall
improvement in AT&C loss, the figure for FY 23-24 will be available after
audited account. The claim that GOJ providing free electricity to small
domestic consumers should not be a reason for high AT&C loss is wrong.
As the geographical and scattered location affects billing and in turn
impacts AT&C loss.
4.172 Objector- Allowance of AT&C loss beyond approved AT&C loss targets will
set a wrong precedence for future at the cost of penalizing consumers
old manual data updation. This amount will be disbursed once the
database is complete in all respects.
4.177 Petitioner- JBVNL has replied to the Hon’ble Commission with all
compliances related to directives and the action taken as of date. All the
directions of the Hon’ble Commission are complied with.
4.181 Petitioner- The reason behind this was well explained in the petition.
However, for the sake of clarity, JBVNL would like to reiterate that
consumers take un due advantage of this provision and demands for
higher sanctioned load with undue justification. This lead to planning
failure of the JBVNL in designing and maintaining the infrastructure. This
has been provided by the data received through smart meters those are
deployed in Ranchi. The justification was communicated to the Hon’ble
Commission.
4.185 Petitioner- JBVNL tried its best to meter all the streetlight connection,
however, it is difficult to meter them because of geographical challenges.
However, initiatives are underway to combine them to bill under metered
connections.
4.186 Objector- LTIS billing demand from 50% to 75% should not be allowed
4.187 Petitioner- It has been observed that LTIS consumers billing demand has
been above the 50% benchmark for many times in a year because of their
operations. It has been proposed to increase the billing demand to
safeguard them from the penalty that is huge.
4.188 Objector- The fixed charge should not be there in the billing at all.
4.189 Petitioner- The SERCs in India follows a two-part tariff system and hence
the fixed charges is one of the component of tariff. This is prerogative of
the Hon’ble Commission and JBVNL has nothing to comment on it.
4.190 Objector- Special category for EV is not logical and would lead to
litigations
4.192 Objector- Solar net metering “JBVNL has failed to introduce the net
metering system in its billing and any reduction in net metering should
not be allowed.
4.193 Petitioner- This was earlier a problem with number of billing agencies.
However, now that the system is having a unified billing system, this
problem has rectified and the billing will start within a month.
4.195 Petitioner- Prepaid smart meter billing and processes are as per the
regulations specified by the Hon’ble Commission.
4.198 Objector- Steep hike is proposed in scheduled charges and being opposed
by the consumer.
4.199 Petitioner-The nominal hike in schedule charge are based on the inflation
rate over the years and the reason that it has not been increased from the
last many years.
4.201 Petitioner- The rebates and online payment was introduced to increase
the awareness and gradually shifts the consumer from offline to online
system. JBVNL is of the view that as the consumer as now fully aware of
the online payment system, there is no need to keep the prompt rebate
and online rebate at a higher level. It should be decreased and gradually
should be removed as it affects the overall revenue of the JBVNL.
4.203 Petitioner- JBVNL has already provided the logic of removing the load
factor rebate in the petition. Generally, the industries should have a
higher load factor depending on its nature of work. By lowering the
baseline of load factor to these industries, it will unnecessarily incentives
the industries for nothing. Hence, the lad factor rebate should be removed
completely.
4.214 The Commission has considered the submission of the stakeholder and
replies by the Petitioner, and deliberated and discussed it in the chapter
in the Order.
Petitioner Submission
4.215 Reply to query 1 – The Proposed tariff hike is to meet the aggregate
Revenue Requirement of JBVNL and to meet the gap created in the past
years due to delayed/non-revision of tariff:
4.216 Reply to query 2- The Petitioner has submitted that, the two-part tariff
structure is as per the recommendation of committee formed by CERC.
The Fixed charge covers the cost of maintain the supply infrastructure
while the variable charge is based on the amount of energy consumed.
The fixed charge id based on the consumer’s maximum demand. They can
business increase revenue by charging consumers for both access to the
service and the amount they use.
4.217 Reply to query 2a- the Petitioner is continuously working reducing its
losses. The main reason behind the losses are
4.218 Reply to query 2b- the Petitioner is continuously working to prevent the
theft in the system. The Petitioner is installing Prepaid Smart mete in the
State. Till now 2.91 lakh Smart Meter has been installed in the state.
Installation of Smart Meter will prevent the theft of electricity.
4.220 Reply to query 2c, d, e, f- the Petitioner is submitted that, the Petitioner
continuously conducts the drive for the arrear recovery in the state.
4.221 In Previous years, the Petitioner has come up with OTS (one-time
settlement) scheme as well and organized various camps and drives for
collection of dues.
4.222 The Petitioner is also strengthening its network under RDSS scheme to
supply quality and reliability power to its consumers.
4.223 The Petitioner has made expenses on the capitalization of assets under
various schemes and strengthening of its distribution network. The
infrastructure growth in distribution network form year 2017 till year
2024 is shown as below. Additionally, the Petitioner intends to highlighted
that, all the expenses as claimed in its true-up petition has been audited
Particul
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
ars
PSS
320 356 367 375 457 491 550 624
(No.)
PTR
668 765 836 857 1089 1188 1285 1430
(No.)
DTR
65477 84739 93293 100409 117160 128272 133676 150813
(No.)
LT line
79510 99319 112724 135439 157459 167295 170085 231299
length
.46 .40 .13 .84 .29 .08 .47 .96
ckm
Energy Sales
Petitioner’s Submission
5.4 The Petitioner has submitted the energy sales based on the annual
audited account for FY 2022-23. Further submitted the connected Load
and number of consumer as shown below:
Commission’s Analysis
5.5 The Commission has reviewed the submission made by the Petitioner and
noted a significant decrease in actual sales compared to the sales
approved in Tariff Order dated February 28, 2024. Consequently, the
Commission asked the Petitioner to provide proper justification for this
decrease in energy sales. In response to the discrepancies noted, the
Petitioner has submitted that the Hon'ble Commission had relied on the
last five-year actual data for the projection for control period from FY
2021-22 to FY 2025-26. Also, the MYT Order was issued on 31.05.2023
i.e. after completion of FY 2022-23. Thus, there is mismatch in the sales
unit for 2022-23 in MYT Order and actual claimed in true up of FY 2022-
23. Also, in Annual Performance Review for FY 2022-23 the Petitioner has
projected 9415.28 MUs also approved by Hon'ble Commission. Further
the Petitioner has submitted that as per clause 6.44 of JSERC Terms
and Conditions for Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulations
2020, sales are an uncontrollable factor.
Table 18: Energy Sales (MUs) as submitted by the Petitioner and approved
by the Commission.
Energy Balance
Petitioner’s Submission
5.7 The Petitioner has submitted that energy availability for FY 2022-23 has
been computed based on the actual Power Purchase and Sales as per the
Audited Accounts for FY 2022-23.
5.8 The Petitioner has further submitted that the Power Purchase from
various sources are segregated into different heads, while calculating the
energy balance for FY 2022-23.
IPPs.
5.9 The Petitioner has computed the energy requirement based on the
formula mentioned below:
Commission’s Analysis
5.11 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has claimed
Distribution losses based on actuals at a level of 30.28% for FY 2022-23
which is inferior to the loss level for FY 2021-22 as 27.45%.
5.12 Accordingly, the Commission has noted that the level of losses recorded
by the DISCOM are exceedingly high and require substantial overhauling.
The deteriorated state of the network has resulted in a significant drain
on both material and economic resources of the nation, which is a cause
of concern.
5.14 In continuation with the Regulatory provisions and having recognized the
issue pertaining to significant Distribution losses, the Commission has
approved the Distribution loss trajectory keeping in mind the actual loss
trajectory, capex infusion done by the State Utility over the years amongst
the prominent items.
5.15 Subsequently, the Commission vide Order dated May 31, 2023 has
approved the Distribution loss trajectory for each year of the Control
period FY 2021-22 to FY 2025-26. The relevant extracts of the MYT Order
are reproduced below:
“7.13 The Commission has observed that in 2nd MYT Control Period the
distribution loss target for FY 2020-21 was 13%. Therefore, considering
the prevailing scenario of the DISCOMs. The Commission has approved
the distribution loss target of 13% on overall sales for each year of the
Control Period. Further, the Petitioner shall be allowed to operate within
distribution loss of 13% on overall sales for the Control Period without
any incentive/penalty”.
5.16 In view of the aforesaid, it is submitted that not abiding by the trajectory
defined by the Commission and factoring into consideration the deviation
in the retail ARR by the Licensee is disdainful.
5.18 The Commission is of the opinion that it would be imprudent if the cost
of the Petitioner’s inefficiency is passed onto the consumers. Accordingly,
the Commission has worked out energy availability for the FY 2022-23
on the basis of actual generation of power from Central, State-owned and
other Generating Stations. Further, the loss in external system has been
considered at the same level as approved by the Commission in its earlier
Order, while the Intra-State Transmission Loss has been considered at
2.23% as per the Tariff Order for JUSNL dated June 23, 2023. The energy
availability from various sources has been summarized below.
Petitioner’s Submission
5.19 The Petitioner has submitted that, it has firm allocations of power from
central allocations like NTPC, NHPC, DVC and other sources such as
TVNL, DVC(STOA), PTC, etc. In addition to these, power was also
purchased from private stations like APNRL, Inland Power, some
quantum from renewable sources during FY 2022-23.
5.20 The Petitioner has prayed to approves the power purchase cost as per the
actual data of FY 2022-23 as summarized in the table below and approve
the power purchase cost accordingly.
Table 21: Power Procurement Cost (Rs. Cr.) as submitted by the Petitioner.
Total cost of
Total units
S.No Name of Generating Station Power Purchase
Purchased (MU)
(in Rs. Crore)
Farrakka I & II 928.94 469.31
Farrakka III 321.88 185.81
Khalagaon I 233.78 113.65
Talcher 538.94 162.28
Khalagaon II 274.31 117.44
Barh I 6.33 3.59
NTPC
Total cost of
Total units
S.No Name of Generating Station Power Purchase
Purchased (MU)
(in Rs. Crore)
4 Total Central Sector 5487.28 4714.05
KTPS (OA) 3877.53 2027.53
Stand by Power 77.23 41.41
UI (Deviation) -167.77 -7.85
DVC
5
Trans. Charge - 75.56
HT Points 0.53 3.41
Total 3787.51 2140.07
6 DVC (STOA) 235.51 123.13
7 TVNL 2317.25 966.99
8 UI Payable (Deviation) 135.79 172.36
Unit I 351.94 151.87
Unit II 351.94 105.85
APNRL
Commission’s Analysis
5.21 It is observed by the Commission that the Petitioner has procured power
from various sources like Central allocation (i.e. NTPC, NHPC, DVC),
private sector (i.e. APNRL, Inland Power, Grasim Industries, etc.), solar
source (i.e. SECI, state IPPs), Wind source (i.e. PTC, SECI) taking into
account the interconnection constraints to optimize its power purchase
expenses.
5.22 With regard to the sale of surplus power, the Commission approves such
transactions. Consequently, the corresponding purchase cost has been
deducted from the overall power purchase cost.
5.23 With regard to the Fuel and Power Purchase Price Adjustment (FPPPA),
the Commission has asked the Petitioner to submit details on bill
computation for the FY 2022-23 period. In response to the inquiry, the
Petitioner stated that the FPPPA is not currently being implemented by it.
Furthermore, they mentioned that any excess charges imposed by the
Thermal Power Plant are being passed on in the True-up Petition. The
Petitioner has further submitted that they are in the process of
implementation of FPPPA from FY 2024-25.
5.24 Furthermore, the Commission has noted that the Petitioners have
included LPS (LPSC plus Surcharge) related to Generating station as
components of their power purchase cost for FY 2022-23. However, the
Commission is of the opinion that the Petitioners have been adequately
provided with working capital to cover expenses related to power
purchase costs and other associated components, Accordingly, the
Commission disallow the expense under the Late Payment Surcharge for
Power purchase from various utilities.
5.25 With regard to scheduling of power, the Commission has asked the
Petitioner to provide the basis of considering the same. In this regard the
Petitioner has submitted that it has more capacity allocated to it from
various CGS, IPPs, Captive and JUUNL than the demand. In view of the
same, the Petitioner schedules full power capacity from power plants
which have been allocated to it under GNA regulation.
Conversely, if in any time block, the Petitioner has less allocation than its
demand then also through requisition, it may avail or apply additional
power from same power plants (with which it has PPA) which have spare
capacity at seven or more time-block before real time through a
mechanism known as Un Requisitioned Surplus ‘URS’. While going for
such requisition also, the Petitioner follows Merit Order Dispatch
Principle by opting for power plants having least variable cost out of all
available option subject to compensation and technical minimum criteria.
5.26 Upon thorough scrutiny and analysis of the data, material, and
information on record, the Commission has observed that the Petitioner
has claimed a substantial cost under UI (Unscheduled Interchange).
Consequently, the Petitioner is hereby directed to implement meticulous
planning for electricity scheduling and procurement. Furthermore, the
Commission emphasizes that henceforth, penal action will be taken if the
UI charges exceed the scheduled energy range, in accordance with the
provisions outlined in the Deviation Settlement Mechanism Regulation.
5.27 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has failed to fulfill RPO
5.28 In reply to the above query the Petitioner has submitted that it has signed
PPA with SECI for 100 MW floating solar PV from Getalsud Dam. Further,
it has submitted that it is in the process of adopting solar rooftop program
from which it will get power from the prosumers in the state. In addition
to this it has tied up with SECI for 700 MW of solar power out of which it
is receiving 450 MW solar power and 250 MW is under pipeline.
5.29 Similarly, cumulative 500 MW of wind power has been tied up with SECI
and PTC out of which it is receiving 200 MW of wind power and 100 MW
of wind power is under pipeline. Further, based on above submission the
petitioner has submitted the RPO Compliance for FY 2022-23 as shown
below:
5.31 Based on the facts and circumstance mentioned above, the Commission
approves the power purchase cost after deduction of sale of surplus power
as given below.
C
V
Transmission Charge
Petitioner’s Submission
5.32 The Petitioner has submitted that actual Inter and Intra-State
transmission charges payable to PGCIL and JUSNL for FY 2022-23
respectively as given below:
Commission Analysis
5.33 With regard to transmission and load dispatch charges, the Commission
has observed that the transmission and load dispatch charges are
uncontrollable factors as per ‘clause 6.44’ of JSERC Distribution Tariff
Regulations 2020. In this regard, the petitioner had directed to provide
the bill for FY 2022-23 towards inter/intra-state transmission charge. In
reply to the Commissions query, the petitioner had submitted the
summary statement of Inter/Intra-state transmission charge along with
the bill for FY 2022-23.
5.34 Accordingly, the Commission after scrutinizing and analyzing the month
wise transmission charge and load dispatch charge and on prudent
check, approves the transmission and load dispatch charges as given
below:
Petitioner’s Submission
5.35 The Petitioner has submitted the capital expenditure (capex) as per the
Audited Accounts for FY 2022-23 as given below:
5.36 The Petitioner has further submitted that the capitalization for FY 2022-
23 as per audited account is provided in the table below:
Commission Analysis
5.37 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has failed to submit the
scheme-wise Capital Expenditure tuned to Rs 706.81 Cr for FY 2022-23.
In this regard, the Commission in its discrepancies note, had directed the
Petitioner to submit the scheme-wise Capital Expenditure tuned to Rs
706.81 Cr for FY 2022-23. In reply to the discrepancy note the Petitioner
has submitted the scheme-wise capital expenditure details. Accordingly,
the Commission, on scrutinizing and analyzing the submission in
discrepancy note and the materials on record, approve the Capital
expenditure of Rs 706.81 crore as per ‘note 3A’ of Annual Audited
Account as shown below:
5.38 Further, the Commission in its discrepancy note had also asked the
Petitioner to submit the detailed scheme-wise comparison of
capitalization approved by the Commission vis-à-vis claimed for FY 2022-
23. In reply to the discrepancy note, the Petitioner has submitted the
scheme wise capitalization as shown below.
5.39 The Commission has noted discrepancies between the total capitalization
provided in the data gap reply and the figures presented in ‘Note 3A’ of
the Annual Audited Account. Consequently, the Commission approves
the capitalization as per the audited accounts, as detailed below:
Petitioner’s Submission
5.40 The Petitioner has submitted that the additions in GFA are created from
various source of financing including Debt, Equity (D&E), Consumer
Contribution and Grants (CCG) etc. The CCG has been considered based
on the actual, however the Debt and Equity are estimated based on norms
and principles adopted by the Hon’ble Commission in its earlier orders.
Table 31: Consumer contribution and grants (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the
Petitioner.
Commission Analysis
5.41 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has claimed the
Capitalization of Rs. 1607.69 Crore for the FY 2022-23 in accordance with
the audited accounts. Further, the Petitioner has considered addition of
Grants (and Consumer Contribution) amounting to Rs. 415.65 Crore
based on the actual Capital Grants received and adjusted for
Amortization of the Grants.
5.42 At the very outset, the approach of the Petitioner is incorrect as the
admission of Interest expenses and Depreciation is based on the Capital
Cost net off grants and consumer contribution. The provisions of the
Distribution Tariff regulations 2020 also aligns with the above approach.
The extracts of the Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 are as follows:
“Capital Cost
……………………………..
Interest on Loan Capital
…………………………….
10.28 The above interest computation shall exclude interest on loan amount,
normative or otherwise, to the extent of capital cost funded by
Consumer Contribution, Grants or Deposit Works carried out by
Distribution Licensee.
……………………………
Depreciation
5.43 Based on the aforesaid, it is clear that the Depreciation, Interest on Loan
are to be admitted on the Capital Cost net off grants. However, the
Petitioner has netted off the grant component by adjusting the
amortization towards grants as well which is not in accordance with the
Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020.
5.44 Accordingly, the Commission has pointed out the Note 17 of the audited
account of FY 2022-23 in respect of Grants/Consumer Contribution is as
under:
5.45 Likewise, the Commission has also observed that the Consumer
Contribution claimed by the Petitioner for FY 2022-23 is inconsistent
with the amount booked in audited account Note 20: Other Current
Financial Liabilities of the Audited Account depicted that the additions
to Consumer Contribution is Rs 87.29 crore computed as a difference
5.46 On analyzing the extract from the audited account, the Commission
approves the consumer contribution/ government grants/deposit works
as Rs 1,147.42 crore for FY 2022-23 as given below:
Petitioner’s Submission
5.47 The Petitioner has calculated Normative GFA from Debt & Equity, Loan
and Equity as per approach adopted by the Hon’ble Commission in its
previous Tariff Orders.
5.48 The Petitioner has bifurcated GFA and accumulated depreciation into
component from Debt & Equity (D&E) and from Consumer contribution
grants (CCG) as per approach by the Hon’ble Commission followed in
previous Tariff Orders. The Petitioner has thereafter applied the
normative debt-equity ratio of 70:30 on GFA out of D&E to calculate
Normative Equity as per JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulation, 2020.
5.49 After netting Normative Equity from closing GFA (out of Debt & Equity),
the Petitioner has deducted, accumulated depreciation pertaining to D&E
component from the resultant to arrive at normative closing debt as
computed hereunder:
Particulars Petition
Opening GFA (A) 19,826.37
CCG towards Opening CWIP (B) 806.95
CCG towards Opening GFA (C) 8,885.34
Opening GFA Less CCG (D = A- C) 10,941.02
Closing GFA (E) 10,107.94
CCG towards Closing GFA (F) 8,885.34
Closing GFA Out of D&E (G= E-F) 11,733.31
Accumulated Depreciation (H) 6,244.75
Accumulated Depreciation Out of D&E (I =H*G/E) 3,418.46
Closing Normative Equity (J = G* 30%) 4,794.85
Closing Normative Loan (K = G-J) 3,519.99
Commission Analysis
5.50 The Commission has observed that the opening balance of consumer
contribution and grants considered by the petitioner for FY 2021-22 is Rs
9692.29 Cr. which is inconsistent with the closing balance of consumer
contribution and grants approved by the Commission in its earlier order.
Hence, the Commission has considered the closing balance of consumer
contribution and grants of FY 2021-22 for opening consumer
contribution and grants for FY 2022-23.
5.52 For funding normative debt-equity, the Commission has considered the
normative debt-equity ratio of 70:30 as provided in the Distribution Tariff
Regulations, 2020. Moreover, consumer contribution grants and
subsidies for capital assets are first netted off from gross fixed assets and
the normative debt-equity ratio is applied on the remaining gross fixed
assets only.
5.53 In line with the aforesaid discussion, the Commission approves the
Particulars Approved
CCG towards CWIP 1331.80
CCG towards GFA 9903.13
Opening GFA (less CCG) 11299.83
Petitioner’s Submission
5.54 The Petitioner has submitted that operational and maintenance expenses
comprise of Employee expenses, Repair & Maintenance expenses and
Administrative & General expenses.
5.55 Further, the Petitioner has submitted that the employee expenses
comprise of salaries, dearness allowance, bonus, terminal benefits in the
form of pension & gratuity, leave encashment and staff welfare expenses.
Accordingly, the Petitioner has submitted employee expenses for FY
2022-23 based on the Audited Accounts as given below.
5.56 The Petitioner has submitted that the Administrative & General (A&G)
expenses for FY 2022-23 is as per the Audited Account as provided in the
table below.
5.57 The Petitioner has submitted that the Repair & Maintenance (R&M)
expenses for FY 2022-23 is as per the Audited Accounts as provided in
the table below.
Commission Analysis
5.58 The Commission has outlined clause 10.3 to clause 10.7 of JSERC
Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 for the approval of operation and
maintenance expense as reproduced below:
10.4 The O&M Expenses for the Base Year of the Control Period shall be approved
by the Commission taking into account the audited accounts of FY 2015-16 to
FY 2019-20, Business Plan filed by the Licensee, estimates of the actual for
the Base Year, prudence Check and any other factor considered appropriate
by the Commission.
10.5 The O&M expenses permissible towards ARR of each year of the Control Period
shall be approved based on the formula shown below:
O&Mn = (R&Mn + EMPn + A&Gn) + Terminal Liabilities
Where,
R&Mn – Repair and Maintenance Costs of the Licensee for the nth year;
EMPn – Employee Costs of the Licensee for the nth year excluding terminal
liabilities;
A&Gn – Administrative and General Costs of the Licensee for the nth year.
10.6 The above components shall be computed in the manner specified below:
costs and Gross Fixed Assets (GFA) and shall be calculated based on the %
of R&M to GFA of the preceding year of the Base Year in the MYT Order after
normalising any abnormal expenses;
‘GFA’ is the opening value of the gross fixed asset of the nth year;
Where,
EMPn-1 – Employee Costs of the Licensee for the (n-1)th year excluding
terminal liabilities;
A&Gn-1 – Administrative and General Costs of the Licensee for the (n-1)th
year excluding legal/litigation expenses;
INDXn – Inflation factor to be used for indexing the employee cost and A&G
cost. This will be a combination of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the
Wholesale Price Index (WPI) for immediately preceding year before the base
year;
Gn – is a growth factor for the nth year and it can be greater than or lesser
than zero based on the actual performance. Value of Gn shall be determined
by the Commission in the MYT Order for meeting the additional manpower
requirement based on the Distribution Licensee’s Filing, benchmarking and
any other factor that the Commission feels appropriate;
Note 2: Any variation due to changes recommended by the Pay Commission, wage
revision agreement, etc., will be considered separately by the Commission;
10.7 The Distribution Licensee, in addition to the above details shall also submit the
detailed break-up of the Legal/Litigation Expenses for the previous Years (FY
2015- 16 to FY 2019-20) along with the details and documentary evidence of
incurring such expenses. The Commission shall approve the legal expenses
as per the relevant provisions of the Jharkhand State Litigation Policy based
on the necessary documentary evidence submitted for the Control Period and
shall carry out due prudence check of legal expenses at the time of truing up.”
5.59 Base on the above excerpt, the Commission had calculated the inflation
factor as 6.87% for FY 2022-23.
5.60 The Commission has also observed that the Petitioner has not submitted
the details of Additional Manpower recruited during FY 2022-23.
5.61 Further, the Commission has observed that the Petitioner has submitted
the nil Growth factor. Hence, based on the above mentioned regulation
the Commission has considered the growth factor as nil for Computation
of employee expenses.
5.62 Based on the facts & circumstances observes in the petition, the
Commission approves the normative employee expenses for FY 2022-23
by taking the actual value of inflation factor (6.87%) and growth factor
(0%).
5.63 The Commission approves the normative A&G Expenses for FY 2022-23,
based on the approved normative A&G Expenses for FY 2021-22 and
actual inflation factor as 6.87% for FY 2022-23.
5.64 For the purpose of evaluating the normative R&M Expenses, the
Commission has taken the approved opening value of Gross Fixed Assets
for FY 2021-22 and by multiplying the ‘k’ factor of 1.22% as approved in
the MYT Order dated May 31, 2023 and inflation factor of 6.87%.
5.65 Based on the above discussion, the Commission approves the normative
operational and maintenance expense as given below.
5.66 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has claimed expenses
towards Terminal Benefit amounting to Rs 218.11 Crore based on certain
expenses booked in the Audited Account. The Tariff Regulations 2020 in
respect of Terminal Benefit provide as above.
5.67 In accordance with clause 10.6 (note 3) the liability towards terminal
benefit is admissible based on either of:
5.68 The Commission has also observed that the Petitioner has not submitted
the Actuarial valuation report along with the instant Petition which is the
quintessential requirement as per the JSERC Distribution Tariff
Regulations, 2020.
5.69 Secondly, the actual amount paid/ deposited in the Trust fund is also not
provided by the Petitioner. Further the Petitioner has merely depicted the
provisions towards Trust fund towards Terminal liabilities while the
Regulations provide for Terminal benefits based on actual amount.
Furthermore, the claim made by Petitioner is inconsistent with the
provisions towards terminal benefits booked in the Audited Accounts.
benefits is Rs. 204.89 Crore against the Petitioner’s claim which is Rs.
218.11 Crore. The same has been indicated below for kind reference.
5.72 The Commission also observed that the Petitioner has reported its
employee benefits provision and plan assets separately (on a gross basis),
which does not comply with Ind AS 19 “Employee Benefits.” This
standard requires the net amount (the difference between the provision
and plan assets) to be disclosed in financial statements. By showing such
figures, the Petitioner financial statements do not accurately reflect its
obligations and resources, potentially misleading its financial position.
5.73 Notably, in the past as well, similar observation was made by the Auditor;
(j) (ii) During the year company has made the provision of Leave
Encashment, Gratuity & pension liability on the basis of
actuarial valuation done up to March 2018.”
5.74 Based on the above excerpts, it could be observed that the Petitioner has
not been depositing in actual, any amount towards terminal benefits
(albeit on a regular basis). The above means to say that although the
expenses towards terminal fund contribution is shown as part of P&L,
the same has not been deposited in Trust funds.
5.75 In view of the above discussion and analysis the Commission approves
the terminal liabilities of Rs 158.30 crore for FY 2022-23 as per
independent auditor report. (i.e. Payment made against Terminal Benefit
as per actuarial report as mention in auditor report)
Table 42: Total actual O&M Expenses (Rs Crore) as approved by the Commission.
Particulars Approved
Employee Expenses 252.14
A&G Expenses 114.12
R&M 266.55
Actual Operational Expenses 632.81
Terminal benefits 158.30
5.77 Further, the Commission has outlined ‘clause 6.48’ to ‘clause 6.53’ of
JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 for the approval of incentive
“6.48 Various elements of the ARR of the Licensee will be subject to incentive
and penalty framework as per the terms specified in this section. The
overall aim shall be to incentivise better performance and penalise poor
performance, compared to the performance norms/benchmarks
specified by the Commission.
5.78 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission approves the sharing of
gain/(loss) on controllable parameter i.e. Operational & Maintenance
expense for FY 2022-23 as shown below.
Table 43: O&M Expenses (Rs Crore) after sharing of gain/(loss) as approved by the
Commission.
Particulars Approved
Normative O&M Expenses 628.49
Petitioner’s Submission
5.79 The Petitioner has submitted that it has arrived at the opening and
closing GFA of FY 2022-23, created out of debt and equity (D&E), by
deducting CCG portion deployed towards opening and closing GFA. The
Petitioner has applied the depreciation rate as per audited account in line
with clause 10.42 of JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 on the
average GFA and accordingly calculations are made to arrive at the total
depreciation being claimed as part of the true-up exercise.
5.80 The Petitioner has claimed Rs 509.68 Crore towards Depreciation for the
FY 2022-23 considering the rate of depreciation of 4.50% as given below:
Commission Analysis
5.81 The Commission has outlined clause 10.34 to clause 10.40 of JSERC
Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 for the approval of Depreciation as
reproduce below:
“Depreciation
10.34 Depreciation shall be calculated every year on the amount of original cost of
the fixed assets as admitted by the Commission: Provided that depreciation
shall not be allowed on assets funded by Consumer Contribution and Capital
Subsidies/Grants. Provision for replacement of such assets shall be made in
the Capital Investment Plan.
10.35 Depreciation for each year shall be determined based on the methodology as
specified in these Regulations along with the rates and other terms specified
in these Regulations.
Provided that the Distribution Licensee shall ensure that once the individual
asset is depreciated to the extent of seventy (70) percent of the Book Value of
that asset, remaining depreciable value as on March 31 of the year closing
shall be spread over the balance useful life of the asset.
10.37 Depreciation shall be charged from the first year of commercial operation of
the asset. In case, the operation of the asset is for a part of the year,
depreciation shall be charged on a pro-rata basis.
10.38 The residual value of assets shall be considered as 10% and depreciation
shall be allowed to a maximum of 90% of the original cost of the asset. Land
is not a depreciable asset and its cost shall be excluded while computing 90%
of the original cost of the asset. Provided that the salvage value for IT
equipment and software shall be considered as NIL and 100% value of the
assets shall be considered depreciable;
10.39 The Commission may, in the absence of the Fixed Assets Register, calculate
Depreciation (%) arrived by dividing the Depreciation and the Average Gross
Fixed Assets as per the latest available Audited Accounts of the Distribution
Licensee. The Depreciation (%) so arrived shall be multiplied by the Average
GFA approved by the Commission for the relevant Financial Year to arrive at
the Depreciation for that Financial Year.
5.82 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has considered the
depreciation rate as 4.50% (i.e. Depreciation rate calculated by dividing
the depreciation of the Year by opening depreciation). In this regard, the
Commission directed the Petitioner to provide proper justification for
considering the same methodology. In reply to the discrepancies note the
Petitioner admitted that the computation error while estimating the
depreciation rate. Accordingly, the Petitioner pray to considered the
5.83 Based on the above excerpts, the Commission is of the view that the
depreciation shall not be allowed on assets funded by consumer
contribution and capital subsidies/grants. Excluding the consumer
contribution deployed towards GFA as approved in this Order, the
Commission has determined the depreciation on the GFA created out of
debt and equity for FY 2022-23. The rate of depreciation has been
considered at 4.32% after scrutinizing the Petitioner reply submission.
The Commission has calculated the Depreciation on Average GFA (net of
Average CCG) as per the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020.
Accordingly, the Commission approves the depreciation for FY 2022-23
as summarized below:
Interest on Loan
Petitioner’s Submission
5.84 The Petitioner has submitted that it has considered the opening debt for
FY 2022-23 equal to closing value of FY 2021-22. Further, Closing debt
for FY 2022-23 has been calculated in line with the JSERC Tariff
Regulations, 2020.
5.85 In accordance with JSERC Tariff Regulations, 2020, the petitioner has
considered the repayment of loan for FY 2022-23 equal to Depreciation
as calculated above.
5.87 The Petitioner has further submitted that it has incurred Bank and
Finance charges to the tune of Rs. 11.00 Crore as per Annual Accounts
for FY 2022-23 towards expenditures like Bank charges, finance charges,
etc.
Table 46: Interest on Loan and Bank Charge (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the
Petitioner
Particulars APR Petition
Opening Balance 4791.21 4451.68
Deemed Addition during the year 571.88 852.85
Deemed Repayments during the year 477.88 509.68
Closing Balance 4885.21 4794.85
Average balance during the Year 4838.21 4623.26
Interest Rate 9.00% 9.10%
Interest Expense 435.44 420.69
Bank & Finance Charge - 11.00
Commission’s Analysis
5.88 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.16, clause 10.17, clause
10.21 to clause 10.29’ of JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020
for the approval of interest of loan and finance charge as reproduced
below:
10.17 New Schemes – For capital expenditure schemes capitalised after April 01,
2021:
b) In case the actual equity employed is in excess of 30%, the amount of equity
for the purpose of tariff determination shall be limited to 30%, and the
balance amount shall be considered as normative loan;
c) In case the actual equity employed is less than 30%, the actual debt-equity
ratio shall be considered;
d) The premium, if any raised by the Licensee while issuing share capital and
investment of internal accruals created out of free reserve, shall also be
reckoned as paid up capital for the purpose of computing return on
equity, provided such premium amount and internal accruals are
actually utilized for meeting capital expenditure.
10.21 The loans arrived at in the manner indicated in Clauses10.16 and 10.17 shall
be considered as gross normative loan for calculation of interest on loan.
10.22 The normative loan outstanding as on April 01, 2021 shall be worked out as
the gross loan by deducting the cumulative repayment as admitted by the
Commission up to March 31, 2021 from the gross normative loan.
10.23 The repayment for each year of the Control Period shall be deemed to be equal
to the depreciation allowed for that year.
10.26 The rate of interest shall be the weighted average rate of interest calculated
on the basis of the actual loan portfolio at the beginning of each year
applicable to the Licensee: Provided that if there is no actual loan for a
particular year but normative loan is still outstanding, then the rate of interest
shall be considered on normative basis and shall be equal to the Bank Rate
as on April 01 of the respective year of the Control Period plus 200 basis
points.
10.27 The interest on loan shall be calculated on the normative average loan of the
year by applying the weighted average rate of interest.
10.28 The above interest computation shall exclude interest on loan amount,
normative or otherwise, to the extent of capital cost funded by Consumer
Contribution, Grants or Deposit Works carried out by Distribution Licensee.
10.29 The Licensee shall make every effort to re-finance the loan as long as it results
in net savings on interest and in that event the costs associated with such re-
financing shall be borne by the users and the net savings shall be shared
between the users and the Licensee, as the case may be, in the ratio of 50:50
5.91 The Commission observed that the Petitioner has deviated from clause
10.26 (proviso) as mention above. In this regard, the Commission in
Technical Validation Session asked the Petitioner to provide proper
justification for considering the interest rate of April 15 instead of April
01. In reply to the said query the Petitioner admits the inadvertent error
while making calculation.
5.93 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has claimed Bank
Charge to the tune of Rs. 11.00 Crore which is significantly high. The
actual Bank charge for the FY 2021-22 were Rs 0.49 Crore. In this regard,
Table 47: Interest on Loan and Bank & Finance Charges (in Rs Crore) as
approved by the Commission.
Particulars APR Petition Approved
Opening Balance 4791.21 4451.68 4791.21
Deemed Addition during the year 571.88 852.85 559.90
Deemed Repayments during the year 477.88 509.68 490.45
Closing Balance 4885.21 4794.85 4860.66
Average balance during the Year 4838.21 4623.26 4825.94
Interest Rate 9.00% 9.10% 9.00%
Interest Expense 435.44 420.69 434.33
Bank & Finance Charge - 11.00 -
Petitioner’s Submission
5.95 The Petitioner has submitted that the Interest on consumer security
(IoCSD) deposit for FY 2022-23 has been computed on the basis of actual
interest on consumer deposit as per Audited Accounts.
Commission’s Analysis
5.96 The Commission has outlined clause 10.33 of JSERC Distribution Tariff
Regulations 2020 for approval of interest on consumer security deposit
as reproduced below:
Return on Equity
Petitioner’s Submission
5.99 The Petitioner has considered the opening balance of normative equity for
2022-23 as per the closing balance for the FY 2021-22.
Commission’s Analysis
Petitioner’s Submission
5.104 The Petitioner has calculated normative working capital requirement for
FY 2022-23 in accordance with JSERC Tariff Regulations, 2020.
5.106 Accordingly, the petitioner has computed the working capital requirement
and interest thereof as given below:
Commission’s Analysis
5.107 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.31 & clause 10.32’ of
JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 for the approval of Interest
on Working Capital is reproduced below:
10.31 Working capital for the Retail Supply of Electricity for the Control Period shall
comprise:
a) Maintenance spares at 1% of Opening GFA for Retail Supply Business; plus
b) Two months equivalent of the expected revenue from sale of electricity at
the prevailing tariffs; minus
c) Amount held as security deposits under Clause (a) and Clause (b) of sub-
section (1) of Section 47 of the Act from consumers and Distribution System
Users net of any security held for Wheeling Business; minus
d) One-month equivalent of cost of power purchased including the Inter-State
and Intra-State Transmission Charges and Load Despatch Charges, based on
the annual power procurement plan.
10.32 Rate of interest on working capital shall be equal to the Bank Rateas on
September 30 of the financial year in which the MYT Petition is filed plus 350
basis points. At the time of true up, the interest rate shall be adjusted as per
the actual rate prevailing on April 01 of the financial year for which truing up
5.108 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has deviated from
clause 10.32 as mention above and considered interest rate of Working
capital as 10.25%. In this regard, the Commission had directed the
Petitioner to provide the proper justification. In reply to the raise query
the Petitioner has admitted that there is inadvertent error while
calculating Interest rate of Working Capital. Further, the Petitioner pray
to considered the rate of interest as per clause 10.32 of JSERC (Terms
and condition for determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulation, 2020.
5.109 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission approves the interest on
working capital for FY 2022-23 is summarized below:
Table 53: Interest on Working Capital (in Rs. Crore) as approved by the
Commission
Particulars Approved
Maintenance Spares @1% of Opening GFA of Wheeling and Retail
113.00
Business
Revenue from Wheeling and Retail Supply Charges-2 month 1170.63
Less: Power Purchase Cost for One Month Retail Business 441.54
Less: Average Security Deposit 707.83
Total Working Capital Requirement 134.26
Rate of Interest (SBI 1 yr MCLR plus 350 b.p) 10.50%
Total Interest on Working capital 14.10
Petitioner’s Submission
5.110 The Petitioner has submitted the Non-Tariff Income (Other Income) of for
FY 2022-23, based on the audited annual accounts.
5.111 The Petitioner has further submitted that while computing the actual
Non-Tariff income (Other Income) for FY 2022-23, the financing cost for
corresponding receivables has to be reduced as accrued Delayed Payment
Surcharge (DPS) is considered as NTI. The petitioner has already incurred
power purchase costs on such outstanding receivables and DPS is levied
as financing cost of such receivables, however, the Petitioner is allowed
only 2 months of receivables on allowance of working capital. For the
5.112 Accordingly, the Petitioner has submitted the Non-tariff income for FY
2022-23 as summarized below:
Commission’s Analysis
5.113 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.53 & clause 10.54’ of
JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020, for the approval of Non-
Tariff Income is reproduced below:
“Non-Tariff Income
Provided that the Distribution Licensee shall submit full details of its
forecast of Non- Tariff Income to the Commission in such form as may
be stipulated by the Commission.
Provided that the interest earned from investments made out of Return
on Equity corresponding to the regulated Business of the Distribution
Licensee shall not be included in Non-Tariff Income.
5.114 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission has observed that the
Petitioner has not considered certain element of non-tariff income
recorded in the audited account. The said item is Rebate on Power
Purchase as reflected in ‘note 25’ of the audited account.
5.115 The Commission does not consider the revenue from sale of wheeling
charge/ fuel surcharge/ outside sale under Non-Tariff Income as the
same has already been considered in the power purchase part of this
order.
5.117 The Commission further opines that the Working Capital requirement as
stipulated in the provision of JSERC (Distribution Tariff) Regulations
5.118 Accordingly, on prudent check the Commission approves the NTI as per
above outlined regulation as shown below.
Commission Analysis
5.119 The Commission is of the view that it had already set the targets for the
Collection efficiency in Section “Targets for Distribution Losses and
Collection Efficiency” of the Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 and
as such the submission of the Petitioner regarding sudden change seems
to be out of order. The Commission thus directs the Petitioner to abide by
the targets set by the Commission and any provision for lower collection
efficiency will not be allowed.
5.120 Accordingly, the additional power purchase cost incurred due to higher
Distribution losses, beyond the targeted level, has been disallowed and is
treated as ‘Disincentive for non-achievement of Distribution loss
targets’ for FY 2022-23. The Commission has adopted similar approach
as adopted by it in the previous Order dated May 31, 2023 in the
computation of non-achievement of T&D loss reduction targets.
Revenue
Petitioner’s Submission
5.122 The Petitioner has submitted the revenue from sale of Power as per
Annual Audited Accounts to be Rs. 5,809.41 Crore towards electricity
sales. Accordingly, the Petitioner prayed to the Hon’ble Commission to
approve the same.
Commission’s Analysis
5.124 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner in FY 2019-20 has not
complied with the directions of the Commission. Further, the Petitioner
has filed an appeal before the Hon’ble APTEL on the same matter in
previous Order dated April 27, 2018. The Appeal in this case no 228 of
2018 and 223 of 2018 is pending before Hon’ble APTEL and the case is
sub-judice.
5.125 The Commission has also pointed out that the Petitioner in FY 2020-21
and FY 2021-22 has not complied with the direction of the Commission.
Accordingly, the Commission had imposed penalty of 2.00% for FY 2020-
21 and FY 2021-22.
5.126 Further, the Commission again imposes penalty of 2% due to the reasons
stated below: -
The Commission has noted that the Petitioner fail to submit the
raised query by public during Public Hearing on the same
petition till the issuance of this Order.
Particulars FY 2022-23
Approved ARR 7023.81
Penalty Imposed 2%
Total Penalty 140.48
Petitioner’s Submission
5.128 Based on the components of the ARR discussed in the above part of this
Order, the final ARR submitted by the Petitioner for FY 2022-23 is
tabulated hereunder:
Commission’s Analysis
5.131 From annual audit account for FY 2020-21the Commission has observed
that the Petitioner already has an outstanding loan amounting to Rs.
9,034.15 Crores borrowed from the State Government. In the present
financial year, the Petitioner has borrowed an added deemed loan from
the State Government amounting to Rs. 136.85 Crores. In the present
financial year, out of the total loan amounting to Rs. 970.76 Crores and
interest of Rs. 1555.65 is currently due for payment.
“13.2 The Licensee shall submit the Annual Performance Review report as
part of annual review on actual performance as per the timelines
specified in the Section A 24 of these Regulations to assess the
performance vis-à-vis the targets approved by the Commission at the
beginning of the Control Period. This shall include annual statements
of its performance and accounts including audited/authenticated
accounts and the tariff worked out in accordance with these
Regulations.”
6.2 The Commission, on the basis of the provisions of the Distribution Tariff
Regulations, 2020 has determined the Annual Performance Review (APR)
for FY 2023-24 on consideration of:
Petitioner Submission
6.5 The Petitioner has submitted that it has considered the active consumers
for the FY 2022-23 and extrapolated with the active consumers for the FY
2023-24 to have a projection of total active consumers for the year 2023-
24.
6.6 The Petitioner has further submitted that connected load for different
category of consumers are also based on the actual load from FY 2022-
23 and the data available with the petitioner for FY 2023-24. The six-
month data of FY 2023-24 are extrapolated with the number for FY 2022-
23 to arrive at the estimated connected load for FY 2023-24.
6.7 Likewise, the Petitioner has been used similar extrapolation for
calculation of the estimated sales for the FY 2023-24. These estimates
are considered with the available trend for connected load and sales for
each category of consumers and the final figures set for further
calculation.
Commission Analysis
Energy Balance
Petitioner’s Submission
6.9 The Petitioner has submitted it has procured power from various sources
for FY 2023-24 which has been segregated into different heads, while
calculating the energy balance for the control period as given below:
6.10 Power Purchase from Outside JSEB Boundary- Power sourced from
NTPC, NHPC, PTC, APNRL, part of TVNL, NVVNL, SECI and RE (Wind);
6.12 Based on the information submitted above, the Petitioner has considered
the Energy Balance for 2023-24 as provided in the Table below:
Commission’s Analysis
6.13 It is observed that the loss levels recorded by DISCOM are extremely poor
and needs severe overhauling. Such dilapidated network is leading to the
drain of the material and economic resources of the nation which is
worrying.
6.14 Factually, since the Distribution Losses and Collection efficiency are a
critical operational parameter of the DISCOM, SERCs across the states
have provided for the same as a controllable parameter for the DISCOMs.
Likewise, the Commission under ‘clause 6.44’ of JSERC Distribution
Tariff Regulations 2020 provides the Distribution Loss and Collection
Efficiency being a Controllable parameter.
6.15 In continuation with the Regulatory provisions and having recognized the
issue pertaining to significant Distribution losses, the Commission has
approved the Distribution loss trajectory keeping in mind the actual loss
trajectory, capex infusion done by the State Utility over the years amongst
the prominent items.
6.16 Subsequently, the Commission vide Order dated May 31, 2023 had
approved the Distribution loss trajectory for each year of the Control
period FY 2021-22 to FY 2025-26. The relevant extracts of the MYT Order
are reproduced below:
“7.13 The Commission has observed that in 2nd MYT Control Period the
distribution loss target for FY 2020-21 was 13%. Therefore, considering
the prevailing scenario of the DISCOMs. The Commission has approved
the distribution loss target of 13% on overall sales for each year of the
Control Period. Further, the Petitioner shall be allowed to operate within
distribution loss of 13% on overall sales for the Control Period without
any incentive/penalty”.
6.17 In view of the aforesaid, it is submitted that not abiding by the trajectory
defined by the Commission and factoring into consideration the deviation
in the retail ARR by the Licensee is disdainful.
6.19 The Commission is of the opinion that it would be imprudent if the cost
of the Petitioner’s inefficiency is passed onto the consumers. Accordingly,
the Commission has worked out energy availability for the FY 2023-24
on the basis of estimated generation of power from Central, State-owned
and other Generating Stations. Further, the loss in external system has
been considered at the same level as approved by the Commission in its
earlier Order, while the Intra-State Transmission Loss has been
considered at 2.23% as per the Tariff Order for JUSNL dated June 23,
2023. The energy availability from various sources has been summarized
below:
Petitioner’s Submission
6.20 The Petitioner has estimated the power purchase quantum for FY 2023-
24 based on the following facts and assumptions:
6.21 The Petitioner has estimated the power purchase Cost for FY 2023-24
based on following facts and assumptions:
6.22 Based on the above facts and assumptions, source-wise estimated Power
Purchase quantum and cost for FY 2023-24 as shown hereunder:
Table 67: Power Purchase quantum and cost as submitted by the Petitioner.
Total Power
Actual estimation Purchase cost
Name of Generating compared to including
S.N.
Stations allocation for FY Trans. Charge
2023-24 (MU) (Rs. Cr.) for FY
2023-24
Farrakka I &II 797 452
Farrakka III 322 186
Khalagaon I 120 64
Talcher 450 181
Khalagaon II 70 34
Barh I 212 139
NTPC
1 Barh II 120 75
Korba 350 126
Darlipalli I 950 366
N. Karnpura 950 473
N. Karnpura New 300 149
Kanti Power 100 62
Nabinagar 200 112
Rangit 32 17
T NHPC
2 Teesta V 254 83
LPSC
3 Chukha 106 38
C
P
Total Power
Actual estimation Purchase cost
Name of Generating compared to including
S.N.
Stations allocation for FY Trans. Charge
2023-24 (MU) (Rs. Cr.) for FY
2023-24
Tala 196 67
Kurichu 0 0
Mangdechhu 56 30
4 Total Central Sector
KTPS (OA) 3877 1956
Standby Power 105 51
DVC
8 66 MW 407 151
ERLDC APNRL 20
Adjustment 0
SECI (Tranche-I) 788 317
SOLAR
SECI (MNRE-II) 16 10
9
State IPPs
(MNRE-I) 19 34
PTC 500 197
Wind
10
SECI
240 80
11 Inland Power Ltd. 372 205
Purchase 635 469
PXIL
IEX
12
/
6.23 The Petitioner has submitted that it has tied up with SECI for 700 MW of
Solar power, out of which it is receiving 450 MW of solar power and 250
MW is under pipeline. Similarly, cumulative 500 MW of wind power has
been tied up with SECI and PTC, out of which, it is receiving 200 MW of
wind power and 100 MW of wind power is under pipeline.
6.24 In addition to the above, the JREDA is installing rooftop solar in the state
in following manner as: -
6.26 Also, in Jharkhand Solar Policy 2022, Government of Jharkhand has set
target of 4000 MW till FY 2026-27 of solar power in State and JREDA has
been made as nodal agency to run various programs like, Implementation
of Solar Park, Canal Top Solar, Floating Solar, etc from 2022-23 to 2026-
27. From above mentioned programs JBVNL will procure power from
Solar Power Plant without competitive bidding up to 5 MW.
6.27 Under the said program, floating solar plant of 100 MW on Getalsud Dam
has been planned with SECI. The PPA with SECI has been approved by
the Commission. Under PM Kusum Yojana 30 MW of solar installation
has been targeted till 2025-26.
6.28 Also, JBVNL implemented Mini grid in villages. Under DDUGJY scheme
216 villages, and 37 villages (16+21) has been tendered in State Funded
Scheme for implementation of mini grid system in the State. Renewable
Purchase Obligation estimated for FY 2023-24 has been mentioned as
below: -
Commission Analysis
6.29 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner had failed to fulfill the
estimate of RPO target as set by the Commission. In this regard the
6.30 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has failed to submit the
power purchase bill for first six months (i.e. April 2023 to October 2023).
In this regard the Commission in its discrepancies note had directed the
Petitioner to reconcile the Power Purchase bill in excel. But till date of
issuance of this Order the Petitioner has failed to provide the detailed as
asked in the discrepancies note. Hence, it is difficult for this Commission
to consider the actual data for H1 period. Therefore, the Commission has
estimated the power purchase quantum for FY 2023-24 based on the
following facts and assumptions.
6.31 Based on the aforesaid observation, the Commission approves the Power
Purchase Cost for FY 2023-24 which has been summarized in the table
below:
Power
Name of Generating Estimated Energy Purchase Cost
S.N.
Stations Purchase in MUs (Rs. Crore) for
FY 2023-24
Farrakka I &II 796.89 350.91
Farrakka III 322.00 154.64
Khalagaon I 120.00 50.45
Talcher 450.00 138.52
Khalagaon II 70.00 27.87
Barh I 211.75 106.29
Barh II 120.00 63.42
NTPC
5
Trans. Charge 0.00 75.56
HT Points 0.06 0.03
Total 3982.37 2086.69
6 TTPS, Tenughat 1762.44 714.01
7 UI Payable (Deviation) 213.11 48.80
8 Reactive Energy Charge -
Unit I 378.39 151.71
APN
RL
8
Unit II 378.39 137.54
Power
Name of Generating Estimated Energy Purchase Cost
S.N.
Stations Purchase in MUs (Rs. Crore) for
FY 2023-24
66 MW 406.57 165.60
ERLDC APNRL 21.09
Adjustment
Total 1163.34 475.94
SECI (Tranche-I) 788.40 220.60
SOLAR
12
/
Sell - -
13 Total Purchase
14 SRHPS (Generation) 38.59 8.63
15 Grand Total 14680.06 6206.96
16 UI Receivable - -
17 SER-DSM 0.00
Grand Total excluding
18 14680.06 6206.96
Transmission Charge
Transmission Charge
Petitioner’s Submission
Commission Analysis
Particulars Approved
Inter-State Transmission Charge (incl. Posoco ERLDC) 382.17
Intra-State Transmission Charge 287.81
Petitioner’s Submission
6.36 Annual Development Plan (ADP): The budget for Annual Development
plan is prepared every year by the Sub-Transmission and Distribution
Network (erstwhile S&D) wing of JBVNL, based on the requirements
raised by the field offices. The budget generally covers the equipment or
works not covered under any other State, Central or Multi-lateral scheme
and mostly focused towards miscellaneous infrastructure replacement
and small works. In order to cater to the load growth and the addition of
new consumers in the system, the state has kept aside budget apart from
centrally sponsored scheme in the form of ADP budget. The funding of
Annual Development Plan is provided by State Government in the form
of loan.
Particulars Petition
Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (RDSS) 244.75
Consumer Metering -
Energy Accounting (DT Metering) 3.47
Energy Accounting (Feeder Metering) 0.94
Loss Reduction 235.20
PMA 5.14
Annual Development Plan (ADP) 200.00
JSBAY -RE and Urban 577.00
Jharkhand Power System Improvement Project (JPSIP) 212.50
Smart Metering in Ranchi 90.00
IT Hardware and software Upgradation 40.00
Software for Power Management 3.00
IT Project Management 2.50
Business Process Upgradation 4.00
Upgradation of Training Centre 3.00
Energy Accounting (Ranchi and Jamshedpur) 70.00
Smart metering Dhanbad 45.00
Total 1,279.25
Commission Analysis
6.41 The Commission approves the capitalization for FY 2023-24 based on the
actual capitalization during FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23 as
a percentage of the Opening CWIP and Capital Expenses incurred during
the respective years and multiplying the same by the sum of Opening
CWIP and Capex approved.
Petitioner’s Submission
6.42 The Petitioner has submitted the Consumer Contribution Grant funding
for FY 2023-24, based on the closing CCG funding of FY 2023-24 as
provided in the Table below:
Commission Analysis
6.45 Further, the Commission has adopted the approach for calculation of
Normative Loan and Equity as done earlier in this order. For estimating
the sources of finance required to fund the closing GFA, the Commission
has reduced the GFA by the CCG available with the Petitioner.
6.46 For funding of the above mentioned GFA, the Commission has considered
the normative debt-equity ratio of 70:30 as provided in Distribution Tariff
Regulations, 2020. Moreover, consumer contribution grants and
subsidies for capital assets are first netted off from gross fixed assets and
the normative debt-equity ratio is applied on the remaining gross fixed
assets only.
6.47 In line with the aforesaid discussion, the Commission approves the
admissible GFA, CCG, debt-equity as given below:
Particulars Approved
CCG towards CWIP 975.41
CCG towards GFA 11406.94
Opening GFA (less CCG) 11403.71
Petitioner’s Submission
6.48 The Petitioner has submitted that the Operation and Maintenance
Expenses (O&M expenses) comprises of Employee Expenses, Repair &
Maintenance Expenses and Administrative & General Expenses.
6.49 The Petitioner has estimated the employee cost for FY 2023-24 by
escalating the employee cost of FY 2022-23 as submitted above in the
chapter for audited True-Up for FY 2022-23 by the inflation factor of
3.10% and the methodology provided under clause 10.6 (b) and (c) of
JSERC MYT Regulations, 2020. Accordingly, the Petitioner has estimated
employee cost of FY 2023-24 is provided in the table below.
6.50 In line with Clause 10.6 (b) and (c) of JSERC MYT Regulations 2020, the
A&G expenses for FY 2023-24 has been calculated by escalating A&G
expense of FY 2022-23 by inflation factor of 3.10%. Accordingly, the
Petitioner has estimated the A&G expenses for FY 2023-14 as provided
in the table below.
6.51 In line with the clause 10.6 (a) of JSERC MYT Regulations 2020, the
R&M expenses for FY 2023-24 have been estimated by applying K-factor
of 1.34% computed based on audited account data of FY 2022-23.
Further the Petitioner has considered Indexation Factor of 3.10% as per
clause 10.6 (a) of JSERC MYT Regulations 2020 for projecting Repair &
Maintenance Expenditure in next Control Period.
Commission Analysis
6.52 The Commission has outlined clause 10.3 to clause 10.7 of JSERC
Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 in earlier chapter for the approval
of operation and maintenance expense.
6.53 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission had calculated the inflation
factor as 5.98% for FY 2023-24.
6.54 Further, the Commission observed that the Petitioner has submitted the
Growth factor as (0%). Hence, based on the regulation as mentioned in
the earlier chapter of this order the Commission has considered the
6.55 Based on the facts & circumstances of the petition, the Commission
approves the normative employee expenses for FY 2023-24 by taking the
actual value of inflation factor (5.98%) and growth factor (0%).
6.56 The Commission approves the normative A&G Expenses for FY 2023-24,
based on the approved normative A&G Expenses for FY 2022-23 and
actual inflation factor as 5.98%.
6.57 For the purpose of estimating the normative R&M Expenses, the
Commission has taken the approved opening value of Gross Fixed Assets
for FY 2023-24 and by multiplying the ‘k’ factor of 1.22% as approved in
the MYT Order dated May 31, 2023 and inflation factor of 5.98%.
6.58 In accordance with clause 10.6 (note 3) the Commission disapproves the
terminal liabilities for FY 2023-24, subject to prudent check at the time
of True-up.
6.59 Based on the above discussion, the Commission approves the normative
operational and maintenance expense as given below.
Depreciation
Petitioner’s Submission
6.60 The Petitioner has estimated the Depreciation for FY 2023-24 in line with
the approach adopted in the audited truing-up for FY 2022-23.
6.61 The Petitioner has first arrived at the opening and closing GFA, created
out of D&E, by deducting the CC&G portion deployed towards opening
and closing GFA. The Petitioner has applied the depreciation rate as
approved by the Commission on the average GFA calculated as per
clause 10.39 of JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 to arrive at
the total depreciation. Accordingly, the Petitioner has estimated the
depreciation expense for FY 2023-24 as shown below.
Commission Analysis
Interest on Loan
Petitioner’s Submission
6.63 The Petitioner has considered the opening debt for FY 2023-24 equal to
closing value of FY 2022-23 as submitted above in the chapter regarding
audited True-up for FY 2022-23.
6.64 In line with clause 10.22 of the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations,
2020, the Petitioner has calculated the Closing debt for FY 2023-24.
6.65 In line with clause 10.23 of the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations,
2020 the Petitioner has considered the repayment of loan for FY 2023-24
equal to Depreciation.
Table 88: Interest on Loan and Bank Charge (Rs. Crore) as submitted by the
Petitioner.
Particulars ARR Petition
Opening Balance 4885.21 4794.85
Deemed Addition during the year 500.03 956.67
Deemed Repayments during the year 483.01 553.89
Closing Balance 4902.23 5197.63
Average balance during the Year 4893.72 4996.24
Interest Rate 9.00% 10.55%
Interest Expense 440.43 527.10
Bank & Finance Charge - 11.00
Commission’s Analysis
6.67 The Commission has outlined ‘clause 10.16, clause 10.17, clause
10.21 to clause 10.29’ of JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020
earlier in this order for the approval of interest on loan and finance
charge.
6.70 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has considered the
interest rate of loan as 9.10% (i.e. 7.10%+200 basis point, Base rate of
SBI other than April 01 of subsequent year). In this regard, the
Commission had directed the Petitioner is to provide proper justification
for deviated from with clause 10.26 (proviso) of JSERC Determination of
Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020. In reply to discrepancies note the
Petitioner has admitted that there is an error while calculating the
interest rate and prayed to consider the interest rate as per clause 10.26
(proviso) JSERC Determination of Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020.
Accordingly, the Commission approves the interest rate as 9.00% (Base
rate of SBI as applicable on April 1st of FY 2023-24 plus 200 basis points)
6.71 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has considered the
bank charge amounting to Rs 11.00 crore. In this regard, the Commission
has directed the Petitioner to provide break-up of the bank charge and
also provide the regulation under which this amount has been claimed.
In reply to the discrepancies note the Petitioner failed to provide
regulation under which this amount has been claimed. Accordingly, the
Commission disallow the bank/finance charge as Rs 11.00 crore, subject
to prudent check at the time of true-up.
Table 89: Interest on Loan (in Rs Crore) and Bank & Finance Charge (Rs.
Crore) as approved by the Commission.
Particulars ARR Petition Approved
Opening Balance 4885.21 4794.85 4860.66
Deemed Addition during the year 500.03 956.67 611.14
Deemed Repayments during the year 483.01 553.89 500.14
Closing Balance 4902.23 5197.63 4971.67
Average balance during the Year 4893.72 4996.24 4916.16
Interest Rate 9.00% 10.55% 10.50%
Interest Expense 440.43 527.10 516.20
Bank & Finance Charge - 11.00 -
Petitioner’s Submission
6.74 Further, in accordance with JSERC Supply Code Regulations, 2015 the
Petitioner has considered the interest rate as 7.95% (i.e. SBI Base Rate
prevailing on 1st April 2023) as shown below.
Commission’s Analysis
6.75 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.33’ of JSERC Distribution
Tariff Regulations 2020 earlier in this order for approval of interest on
consumer security deposit.
6.76 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner in the instant petition
has claimed interest on Consumer Security Deposit to the tune of Rs
59.09 crore. Further, the Petitioner has escalated the Consumer Security
Deposit by an arbitrary 5.00% over the actual of FY 2022-23 and has
applied an interest rate equivalent to SBI Bank Rate.
6.77 In view of the aforesaid, reliance is placed on the actual security deposit
paid by the Petitioner during the FY 2022-23. From the Audited Accounts
of FY 2022-23, it could be observed that Petitioner is not discharging
Interest on Consumer Security Deposit to the prospective consumers. The
Interest on Consumer Security Deposit balance is provided at ‘Note 16’
of the Audited Financial Statements. The Interest on Consumer Security
Deposit balance as on 31.03.2023 is Rs. 497.95 Crores and the
outstanding interest payable as on 31.03.2022 is Rs. 488.83 Crores.
Further, the addition to Interest accrued on Security Deposit during the
FY 2022-23 is Rs. 58.98 Crores (ref ‘Note 29’ of the Audited Accounts).
Accordingly, the Commission has considered the interest on security
deposit for FY 2023-24 equal to FY 2022-23 as shown below:
Return on Equity
Petitioner’s Submission
6.78 The Petitioner has considered the opening balance of normative equity for
FY 2023-24 as per the closing balance for the FY 2022-23 as submitted
in the True-up for FY 2021-22.
Commission’s Analysis
Petitioner’s Submission
6.83 In line with the ‘clause 10.29 and clause 10.30’ of the JSERC Tariff
Regulations, 2020, the Petitioner has estimated the working capital
requirement for FY 2023-24.
6.84 Rate of IoWC has been considered to be equal to the SBI MCLR (for 1-
year period) prevailing as on 1 April, 2023 plus 350 basis points as per
‘clause 10.31’ of the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020.
6.85 Based on the estimated expenditure for FY 2023-23, the Petitioner has
estimated the working capital requirement and interest thereof, as
provided in the table below.
Commission’s Analysis
6.86 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.31 & clause 10.32’ of
JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 for the approval of Interest
on Working Capital as reproduced below.
10.31 Working capital for the Retail Supply of Electricity for the Control Period shall
comprise:
10.32 Rate of interest on working capital shall be equal to the Bank Rateas on
September 30 of the financial year in which the MYT Petition is filed plus 350
basis points. At the time of true up, the interest rate shall be adjusted as per
the actual rate prevailing on April 01 of the financial year for which truing up
exercise has been undertaken.
6.87 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has deviated from clause
10.32 as mention above and considered interest rate of Working capital
as 10.25%. In this regard, the Commission had directed the Petitioner to
provide the proper justification. In reply to the raise query the Petitioner
has admitted that there is inadvertent error while calculating Interest rate
of Working Capital. Further, the Petitioner pray to considered the rate of
interest as per clause 10.32 of JSERC (Terms and condition for
determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulation, 2020.
6.88 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission approves the interest on
working capital for FY 2023-24 as summarized below:
Table 95: Interest on Working Capital (in Rs. Crore) as approved by the
Commission.
Particulars Approved
Maintenance Spares @1% of Opening GFA of Wheeling and Retail
114.04
Business
Revenue from Wheeling and Retail Supply Charges-2 month 1224.13
Less: Power Purchase Cost for One Month Retail Business 469.31
Less: Average Security Deposit 707.83
Total Working Capital Requirement 161.03
Rate of Interest (SBI 1 yr MCLR plus 350 b.p) 12.00%
Total Interest on Working capital 19.32
Petitioner’s Submission
6.89 The Petitioner has submitted the Non-Tariff Income (Other Income) for FY
2023-24 at the level of FY 2022-23.
6.90 The Petitioner has already submitted the rationale behind the
computation of NTI in True-up Chapter, which is in line with the
judgement of Hon’ble APTEL dated 12.07.2011 in case No. 142 & 147 of
2009. Accordingly, the Petitioner prayed to approve the Non-tariff income
as summarized below:
Commission’s Analysis
6.91 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.53 & clause 10.54’ of
JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 earlier in true-up chapter for
the approval of Non-Tariff Income.
6.92 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission has observed that the
Petitioners approach for excluding Delayed payment surcharge and
rebate on power purchase is inappropriate and non-maintainable.
6.93 The Commission does not consider the revenue from sale of wheeling
charge/ fuel surcharge/outside sale under Non-Tariff Income as the same
has already been disallow in the power purchase part of this order.
6.94 Accordingly, on prudent check the Commission approves the NTI as per
above outlined regulation as shown below.
Petitioner Submission
6.95 The Petitioner would like to further reiterate that several administrative
measures has been undertaken to curb the AT&C losses along with the
technical measures such as increasing the metering, focusing on billing
efficiency and collection efficiency improvement. It is submitted that
Hon’ble Commission has approved 99% collection efficiency for FY 2023-
24, which is on extremely higher side and even the most efficient State
utilities in the Country are not able to achieve it.
6.96 In order to reduce the losses JBVNL has already completed 100% Feeder
Metering and is in process of ensuring 100% metering of DTs and
Consumers to enable energy auditing. Further, Petitioner is also taking
other measures like Name and Shame Campaign, preparation of MIS for
performance monitoring and management, Feeder Improvement Program
for network strengthening, Physical segregation of feeders, Installation of
AMR meters, providing electricity access to unconnected households,
Implementation of ERP systems, Installation of AB Cables, Tying up with
6.99 The Petitioner has aligned itself to the trajectory approved for Jharkhand
under the RDSS scheme by Ministry of Power. Therefore, the petitioner
prays to Hon’ble Commission to consider the target of AT&C loss as per
the RDSS targets for the state of Jharkhand while approving the APR for
FY 2023-24.
Commission Analysis
6.100 The Commission is of the view that it had already set targets for the
Collection efficiency in Section “Targets for Distribution Losses and
Collection Efficiency” of the Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 and
as such the submission of the Petitioner regarding sudden change seems
to be out of order. The Commission thus directs the Petitioner to abide by
the targets set by the Commission and any provision for lower collection
efficiency will not be allowed.
6.101 Accordingly, the additional power purchase cost incurred due to higher
Distribution losses, beyond the targeted level, has been disallowed and is
treated as ‘Disincentive for non-achievement of Distribution loss
targets’ for FY 2023-24.
Total Unit
Rate (in Disallow
Generating Station Annotation disallow
Rs) Cost
(MU)
(Transmission Charge
Corresponding to 1932.93 MU @ Rs I 36.68
0.19/unit on pro-rata basis)
Net total Disallow J=D+E+H+I 2364.69 1245.27
Revenue
Petitioner’s Submission
6.103 The Petitioner has estimated the revenue from sale of Power to be Rs.
7433.89 Crore for FY 2023-24 towards electricity sales.
Commission’s Analysis
6.104 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has estimated revenue
from sale of Power based on Tariff Order dated May 31, 2023 for FY 2023-
24. In this regard, the Commission directed the Petitioner to recalculated
the revenue as well as accumulated revenue gap/surplus as per tariff
Order lies for FY 2023-24. In reply to discrepancies the Petitioner has
failed to recalculated the revenue and prayed to modify the estimated
revenue from sale of Power as per the revised tariff. Accordingly, the
Commission estimated revenue for FY 2023-24 based on Tariff Order
dated October 01, 2020 for first two months (i.e. April, May), Tariff Order
dated May 31, 2023 for next nine months (i.e. June to February) and
Tariff Order dated February 28, 2024 for next one month (i.e. March) as
shown below.
Petitioner’s Submission
6.105 Based on the components of the ARR discussed in the above part, the
final ARR submitted by the Petitioner for FY 2023-24 is as below:
Commission’s Analysis
6.107 The Commission has approved the treatment of the Gap/(Surplus) at existing
tariff in Chapter 8 of this Order.
7.1 The Petitioner has submitted the Aggregate Revenue Requirement and
Tariff for FY 2024-25 as per clause A24 of JSERC (Term and Condition
for Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulation, 2020.
Petitioner Submission
7.3 The Petitioner has submitted to consider the billing determinants for FY
2024-25 as per estimations submitted in this Petition, which have been
arrived at by considering the actual data of FY 2022-23 and 6 month
estimates for FY 2023-24.
7.4 The category wise number of consumers connected load and Energy sales
projected for FY 2024-25 is done based on the estimate percentage growth
rate. JBVNL has considered a growth rate of 2% for LT Domestic
Consumers for the FY 2024-25 over FY 2023-24.
7.5 For projecting the Commercial consumers for the FY 2024-25, a nominal
growth rate of 1 %, which has been applied on the number of consumers
during FY 2023-24.
7.7 For projecting the industrial consumers for the FY 2024-25, a growth rate
7.9 In order to arrive at the number of Street Light Consumers, JBVNL has
kept the Consumers base at the same level of FY 2023-24.
7.10 Military Engineering Services (MES) and is having mixed load in defence
cantonment and related area. JBVNL has assumed the same number of
Consumers.
7.12 On the basis of the above excerpt, the Petitioner has submitted the
Category-wise billing determinants for FY 2023-24 as shown in the Table
below:
Commission Analysis
7.14 Hence, the Commission at this stage has considered the projection as
made by the Petitioner, and approves the number of Consumers,
Connected Load and Energy sales, subject to prudent check at the time
of truing up based on actuals.
Table 103: Energy Sales as submitted by the Petitioner and approved by the
Commission.
Energy Balance
Petitioner’s Submission
7.15 The Petitioner has submitted that the Power Purchase from various
sources are segregated into different heads, while calculating the energy
balance for FY 2024-25.
7.17 Based on the information provided above, Energy Balance of JBVNL for
FY 2024-25 as summarized below:
Commission’s Analysis
7.18 It is observed that the loss levels recorded by DISCOM are extremely poor
and needs severe overhauling. Such dilapidated network is leading to the
drain of the material and economic resources of the nation, which is a
cause of worry.
7.19 Factually, since the Distribution Losses and Collection efficiency are a
critical operational parameter of the DISCOM, SERCs across the states
have provided for the same as a controllable parameter for the DISCOMs.
Likewise, the Commission under ‘clause 6.44’ of the Distribution Tariff
Regulations 2020 provides the Distribution Loss and Collection Efficiency
being a Controllable parameter.
7.20 In continuation with the Regulatory provisions and having recognized the
issue pertaining to significant Distribution losses, the Commission has
approved the Distribution loss trajectory keeping in mind the actual loss
trajectory, capex infusion done by the State Utility over the years amongst
the prominent items.
7.21 Subsequently, the Commission vide Order dated May 31, 2023 has
approved the Distribution loss trajectory for each year of the Control
period FY 2021-22 to FY 2025-26. The relevant extracts of the MYT Order
are reproduced below:
“7.13 The Commission has observed that in 2nd MYT Control Period the
distribution loss target for FY 2020-21 was 13%. Therefore, considering
the prevailing scenario of the DISCOMs. The Commission has approved
the distribution loss target of 13% on overall sales for each year of the
Control Period. Further, the Petitioner shall be allowed to operate within
distribution loss of 13% on overall sales for the Control Period without any
incentive/penalty”.
7.22 In view of the aforesaid, it is submitted that not abiding by the trajectory
defined by the Commission and factoring into consideration the deviation
in the retail ARR by the Licensee is disdainful.
7.24 The Commission is of the opinion that it would be imprudent if the cost
of the Petitioner’s inefficiency is passed onto the consumers. Accordingly,
the Commission has worked out energy availability for the FY 2024-25
on the basis of estimated generation of power from Central, State-owned
and other Generating Stations. Further, the loss in external system has
been considered at the same level as approved by the Commission in its
earlier Order, while the Intra-State Transmission Loss has been
considered at 2.23% as per the Tariff Order for JUSNL dated June 23,
2023. The energy availability from various sources has been summarized
below:
Petitioner’s Submission
7.25 The Petitioner has projected the power purchase quantum for FY 2024-
25 based on following facts and assumptions:
7.26 Based on aforesaid assumption the Petitioner has projected the Power
Purchase Quantum and Cost for FY 2024-25 is tabulated hereunder:
Barh II 126 83
1
Korba 350 132
Darlipalli I 950 384
C
P
3
Kurichu 0 0
Mangdechhu 58 33
4 Total Central Sector
KTPS (OA) 3877 1889
Standby Power 105 54
DVC
8 66 MW 407 159
ERLDC APNRL 21
Adjustment
SECI (Tranche-I) 788 217
SOLAR
SECI (MNRE-II) 17 11
9
State IPPs
(MNRE-I) 20 38
PTC 525 195
Win
10
d
SECI 252 72
11 Inland Power Ltd. 391 226
Purchase 635 469
PXIL
IEX
12
/
JUSNL 283
19 Net Unit 14837 8051
7.27 The Petitioner has submitted that as per JSERC (Renewable Purchase
Commission Analysis
7.28 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has submitted that as
per JSERC (Renewable Purchase Obligation and its compliance) first
amendment regulations 2021 clause no. 10, obligated entities are
mandated to purchase electricity from renewable sources up to FY 2023-
24. There are no targets specified for FY 2024-25. During the technical
Distributed Other
Wind Hydro Renewable Renewable Total
Energy Energy
RPO
0.67% 0.38% 1.50% 27.36% 29.91%
Obligation
7.32 The Commission has projected the power purchase quantum for FY 2024-
25 based on the following facts and assumptions.
7.33 Based on the aforesaid observation, the Commission approves the Power
Purchase Cost for FY 2024-25 which has been summarized in the table
below:
Power
Projected Power Purchase Cost
S.N. Name of Generating Stations
Purchase in MU (Rs Cr. for FY
2024-25
Farrakka I &II 796.89 361.44
Farrakka III 322.00 159.28
Khalagaon I 126.00 54.56
Talcher 450.00 142.67
Khalagaon II 73.50 30.14
Barh I 222.34 114.95
Barh II 126.00 68.58
NTPC
C
P
Power
Projected Power Purchase Cost
S.N. Name of Generating Stations
Purchase in MU (Rs Cr. for FY
2024-25
Teesta V 254.06 67.55
LPSC 0.00
Total 287.57 81.80
Chukha 111.60 28.99
Tala 205.49 48.69
PTC
5
Trans. Charge 75.56
HT Points 0.06 0.03
Total 3982.37 2147.02
6 TTPS, Tenughat 1800.00 751.11
7 UI Payable (Deviation) 213.11 50.27
8 Reactive Energy Charge 0.00
Unit I 378.39 156.26
Unit II 378.39 141.67
APNRL
66 MW 406.57 170.57
8
ERLDC APNRL 21.72
Adjustment 0.00
Total 1163.34 490.22
SECI (Tranche-I) 788.40 220.60
SOLAR
12
/
Power
Projected Power Purchase Cost
S.N. Name of Generating Stations
Purchase in MU (Rs Cr. for FY
2024-25
Net Power Purchase
18 Quantum and Cost excluding 14837.50 6451.23
Transmission Charge
Transmission Charge
Petitioner’s Submission
Commission Analysis
7.35 Based on the above submission, the Commission has calculated the total
Intra state Transmission charge as Rs 323.59 Cr for FY 2024-25
considering Rs 0.31 per unit for first four months and Rs 0.37 per unit
for next eight months on energy input through state transmission system.
Particulars Approved
Inter-State Transmission Charge (incl. Posoco ERLDC) 396.75
Intra-State Transmission Charge 323.59
Petitioner’s Submission
7.37 The Petitioner has submitted the capital expenditure of Rs 2554.34 Crore
for FY 2024-25. A brief discussion regarding the expected expenditure is
provided below:
Particulars Petition
Revamped Distribution Sector Scheme (RDSS) 1,806.72
Consumer Metering 98.86
Energy Accounting (DT Metering) 11.39
Energy Accounting (Feeder Metering) 1.03
Loss Reduction 1,680.02
PMA 15.42
Annual Development Plan (ADP) 562.00
JSBAY -RE and Urban
Jharkhand Power System Improvement Project (JPSIP) 157.62
Smart Metering in Ranchi 61.00
IT Hardware and software Upgradation 25.00
Software for Power Management 3.00
IT Project Management 1.50
Business Process Upgradation 2.00
Upgradation of Training Centre 0.50
Energy Accounting (Ranchi and Jamshedpur) 64.62
Smart metering Dhanbad 28.00
Total 2,554.34
Commission Analysis
7.39 The Commission has approved the capitalization for FY 2024-25 based
on the actual capitalization during, FY 2020-21, FY 2021-22 and FY
2022-23 as a percentage the Opening CWIP and Capital Expenses
incurred during the respective years and multiplying the same by the sum
Petitioner’s Submission
7.40 The Petitioner has submitted the Consumer Contribution Grant funding
for FY 2024-25, based on the closing CCG funding of FY 2024-25 as
provided in the table below:
Commission Analysis
7.43 Further, the Commission has adopted the approach for calculation of
Normative Loan and Equity as done earlier in this order. For estimating
the sources of finance required to fund the closing GFA, the Commission
has reduced the GFA by the CCG available with the Petitioner.
7.44 For funding of the above mentioned GFA, the Commission has considered
the normative debt-equity ratio of 70:30 as provided in Distribution Tariff
Regulations, 2020. Moreover, consumer contribution grants and
subsidies for capital assets are first netted off from gross fixed assets and
the normative debt-equity ratio is applied on the remaining gross fixed
assets only.
7.45 In line with the aforesaid discussion, the Commission approves the
admissible GFA, CCG, debt-equity as given below:
Particulars Approved
CCG towards CWIP 912.46
CCG towards GFA 12617.31
Opening GFA (less CCG) 11748.33
Particulars Approved
Normative Equity (Closing) 3612.69
Petitioner’s Submission
7.46 The Petitioner has submitted that the Operation and Maintenance
Expenses (O&M expenses) comprises of Employee Expenses, Repair &
Maintenance Expenses and Administrative & General Expenses.
7.47 The Petitioner has calculated the employee cost for FY 2024-25 by
escalating the employee cost of FY 2023-24 as submitted above in
Chapter of APR for FY 2023-24 by the inflation factor of 3.10 % and the
methodology provided under ‘clause 10.6 (b) and (c)’ of JSERC MYT
Regulations, 2020. Accordingly, the Petitioner has projected employee
cost for FY 2024-25 as provided in the table below.
7.48 In line with ‘clause 10.6 (b) and (c)’ of JSERC MYT Regulations 2020,
the A&G expenses for FY 2024-25 has been calculated by escalating A&G
expense of FY 2023-24 by inflation factor 3.10%. Accordingly, the
petitioner has estimated the A&G expenses for FY 2024-25 is provided in
the table below.
7.49 In line with the ‘clause 10.6 (a)’ of JSERC MYT Regulations 2020, the
R&M expenses for FY 2023-24 have been estimated by applying K-factor
of 1.49% as computed and based on estimated data of FY 2024-25.
Further the Petitioner has considered Indexation Factor of 3.10% as per
clause 10.6 (a) of JSERC MYT Regulations 2020 for projecting Repair &
Commission Analysis
7.50 The Commission has outlined ‘clause 10.3 to clause 10.7’ of JSERC
Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 in True-up chapter for the approval
of operation and maintenance expense.
7.51 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission had calculated the inflation
factor as 6.59% for FY 2024-25.
7.52 Further, the Commission has observed that the Petitioner has submitted
the Growth factor as (0%). Hence, based on the regulation as mentioned
in the earlier chapter of this order, the Commission has considered the
growth factor as nil for Computation of employee expenses.
7.53 Based on the facts & circumstances of the petition, the Commission
approves the normative employee expenses for FY 2024-25, by taking the
actual value of inflation factor (6.59%) and growth factor (0%).
7.54 The Commission approves the normative A&G Expenses for FY 2024-25,
based on the approved normative A&G Expenses for FY 2023-24 and
estimated inflation factor as 6.59%.
7.55 For the purpose of evaluating the normative R&M Expenses, the
Commission has taken the approved opening value of Gross Fixed Assets
for FY 2023-24 and by multiplying the ‘k’ factor of 1.22% as approved in
the MYT Order dated May 31, 2023 and inflation factor of 6.59%.
7.57 Based on the above discussion the Commission approves the normative
operational and maintenance expense as given below.
Depreciation
Petitioner’s Submission
7.58 The Petitioner has estimated the Depreciation for FY 2024-25 in line with
7.59 The Petitioner has first arrived at the opening and closing GFA, created
out of D&E, by deducting the CC&G portion deployed towards opening
and closing GFA. The Petitioner has applied the depreciation rate as
approved by the Commission on the average GFA calculated as per
clause 10.39 of JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 to arrive at
the total depreciation. Accordingly, the Petitioner has projected the
depreciation expense for FY 2024-25 as shown below.
Commission Analysis
Particulars Approved
Depreciation Rate (%) 4.32%
Depreciation Cost (Rs. Cr.) 513.93
Interest on Loan
Petitioner’s Submission
7.61 The Petitioner has considered opening debt for FY 2024-25 as equal to
closing value of FY 2023-24, as submitted in the above chapter regarding
audited APR for FY 2023-24.
7.62 In line with ‘clause 10.22’ of the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations,
2020, the Petitioner has calculated the Closing debt for FY 2024-25.
7.63 In line with ‘clause 10.23’ of the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations,
2020 the Petitioner has considered the repayment of loan for FY 2024-25
as equal to Depreciation.
Table 130: Interest on Loan and Bank Charge (Rs. Crore) as submitted by
the Petitioner.
Particulars MYT Petition
Opening Balance 6052.11 5197.63
Deemed Addition during the year 885.57 1147.52
Deemed Repayments during the year 553.94 609.07
Closing Balance 6383.73 5736.08
Average balance during the Year 6217.92 5466.85
Interest Rate 9.00% 10.55%
Interest Expense 559.61 576.75
Bank & Finance Charge - 11.00
Commission’s Analysis
7.65 The Commission has outlined ‘clause 10.16, clause 10.17, clause
10.21 to clause 10.29’ of JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020
earlier in this order for the approval of interest of loan and finance charge.
7.68 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has considered the
interest rate of loan as 10.55% (i.e. 8.55%+200 basis point, Base rate of
SBI other than April 01 of subsequent year). In this regard, the
Commission had directed the Petitioner is to provide proper justification
for deviated from with ‘clause 10.26 (proviso)’ of JSERC Determination
of Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020. In reply to discrepancies note the
Petitioner has admitted that there is an error while calculating the
interest rate and prayed to consider the interest rate as per clause 10.26
(proviso) JSERC Determination of Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020.
Accordingly, the Commission approves the interest rate as 9.00% (Base
rate of SBI as applicable on April 1st of FY 2023-24 plus 200 basis points)
in accordance with ‘clause 10.26 (proviso)’ as mentioned above.
7.69 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has considered the
bank charge amounting to Rs 11.00 crore. In this regard, the Commission
has directed the Petitioner to provide break-up of the bank charge and
also provide the regulation under which this amount has been claimed.
In reply to the discrepancies note the Petitioner failed to provide
regulation under which this amount has been claimed. Accordingly, the
Commission disallow the bank/finance charge as Rs 11.00 crore, subject
to prudent check at the time of true-up.
Table 131: Interest on Loan and Finance Charges (in Rs Crore) as approved
by the Commission.
Particulars MYT Petition Approved
Opening Balance 6052.11 5197.63 4971.67
Deemed Addition during the year 885.57 1147.52 588.02
Deemed Repayments during the year 553.94 609.07 513.93
Closing Balance 6383.73 5736.08 5045.75
Average balance during the Year 6217.92 5466.85 5008.71
Interest Rate 9.00% 10.55% 10.50%
Interest Expense 559.61 576.75 525.91
Bank & Finance Charge - 11.00 -
Petitioner’s Submission
7.72 Further, in accordance with JSERC Supply Code Regulations, 2015 the
Petitioner has considered the interest rate as 8.70% (i.e. SBI Base Rate
prevailing on Nov 2022) as shown below.
Commission’s Analysis
7.74 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner in the instant petition
has claimed interest on Consumer Security Deposit to the tune of Rs
69.84 crore. Further, the Petitioner has escalated the Consumer Security
Deposit by an arbitrary 5.00% over APR of FY 2023-24 and has applied
an interest rate equivalent to SBI Bank Rate.
7.75 In view of the aforesaid, reliance is placed on the actual security deposit
paid by the Licensee during the FY 2022-23. From the Audited Accounts
of FY 2022-23, it could be observed that the Petitioner is not discharging
Interest on Consumer Security Deposit to the prospective consumers. The
Interest on Consumer Security Deposit balance is provided at ‘Note 16’
of the Audited Financial Statements. The Interest on Consumer Security
Deposit balance as on 31.03.2022 is Rs. 488.83 Crores and the
outstanding interest payable as on 31.03.2023 Rs. 497.95 Crores.
Further, the addition to Interest accrued on Security Deposit during the
FY 2022-23 is Rs. 58.98 Crores (ref Note 29 of the Audited Accounts).
The table below summarizes the actual Interest on Security Deposit
discharges during the FY 2024-25:
Return on Equity
Petitioner’s Submission
7.76 The Petitioner has considered the opening balance of normative equity for
FY 2024-25 as per the closing balance for the FY 2023-24, as submitted
above in the chapter regarding APR for FY 2023-24.
Commission’s Analysis
Petitioner’s Submission
7.81 In line with the ‘clause 10.29 and 10.30’ of the JSERC Distribution
Tariff Regulations, 2020, the Petitioner has estimated the working capital
requirement for FY 2024-25.
7.82 Rate of IoWC has been considered to be equal to the SBI MCLR (for 1-
year period) prevailing as on September 30, 2023 plus 350 Basis Points
as per clause 10.31 of the JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020.
7.83 It has been submitted that based on the expenditure for FY 2024-25, the
Petitioner has estimated the working capital requirement and interest
thereof, as provided in the Table below.
Commission’s Analysis
7.84 The Commission has outlined the ‘clause 10.31 & clause 10.32’ of
JSERC Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 earlier in True-up Chapter
for the approval of Interest on Working Capital.
7.85 Based on above the excerpt, the Commission approves the interest on
working capital for FY 2024-25 as summarized below:
Table 137: Interest on Working Capital (in Rs. Crore) as approved by the
Commission
Particulars Approved
Maintenance Spares @1% of Opening GFA of Wheeling and Retail
117.48
Business
Revenue from Wheeling and Retail Supply Charges-2 month 1346.06
Less: Power Purchase Cost for One Month Retail Business 522.33
Less: Average Security Deposit 707.83
Total Working Capital Requirement 233.38
Rate of Interest (SBI 1 yr MCLR plus 350 b.p) 12.00%
Total Interest on Working capital 28.01
Petitioner’s Submission
7.86 The Petitioner has submitted the Non-Tariff Income (Other Income) for FY
2024-25 at the level of FY 2022-23.
7.87 The Petitioner has already submitted the rationale behind the
computation of NTI in True-up Chapter, which is in line with the
judgement of Hon’ble APTEL dated 12.07.2011 in case No. 142 & 147 of
2009. Accordingly, the Petitioner prayed to the Commission to approves
the Non-tariff income as summarized below:
Commission’s Analysis
7.88 The Commission has outlined ‘clause 10.53 & clause 10.54’ of JSERC
Distribution Tariff Regulations 2020 earlier in true-up chapter for the
approval of Non-Tariff Income.
7.89 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission has observed that the
Petitioners approach of excluding Delayed payment surcharge and rebate
on power purchase is inappropriate and non-maintainable.
7.90 The Commission does not consider the revenue from sale of wheeling
charge/ fuel surcharge/ outside sale under Non-Tariff Income as the
same has already been considered in the power purchase section of this
order.
7.91 The Commission further opines that the Working Capital requirement as
stipulated in the provision of JSERC (Distribution Tariff) Regulations
2020 and amendment thereof is being allowed as per normative to cater
7.92 Accordingly, on prudent check the Commission approves the NTI as per
above outlined regulation as shown below.
Commission Analysis
7.93 The Commission is of the view that it had already set the targets for the
Collection efficiency in Section “Targets for Distribution Losses and
Collection Efficiency” of the Distribution Tariff Regulations, 2020 and as
such the submission of the Petitioner regarding sudden change seems to
be out of order. The Commission thus directs the Petitioner to abide by
the targets set by the Commission and any provision for lower collection
efficiency will not be allowed.
7.94 Accordingly, the additional power purchase cost incurred due to higher
Distribution losses, beyond the targeted level, has been disallowed and is
treated as ‘Disincentive for non-achievement of Distribution loss targets’
for FY 2024-25. The Commission has adopted similar approach as
adopted by it in the previous Order dated February 28, 2024 in the
computation of non-achievement of T&D loss reduction targets. The non-
Revenue
Petitioner’s Submission
7.95 The Petitioner has projected the revenue from sale of Power to be Rs.
7759.98 Crore for FY 2024-25 towards electricity sales.
Commission’s Analysis
7.96 The Commission has calculated revenue based on Tariff Order date
February 28, 2024 for FY 2024-25 as shown below.
Petitioner’s Submission
7.97 Based on the components of the ARR discussed in the above para, the
final ARR submitted by the Petitioner for FY 2024-25 is as below:
Commission’s Analysis
Commission Analysis
8.1 Based on the approved ARR and revenue from existing tariff, the
Commission has approved the Revenue Gap/(Surplus) for FY 2024-25 as
shown below:
FY 24-25
Particulars
Approved
Annual Revenue Requirement 8076.33
Revenue Gap / (Surplus) created during the Year 8390.63
Total Revenue Gap/(Surplus) (314.30)
8.3 Based on the above excerpt, the Commission is of the opinion that the
existing tariff effective from March 01, 2024, for JBVNL, not only fulfills
the Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR) but also generates a revenue
surplus for FY 2024-25. This surplus shall offset the cumulative revenue
gap from previous years. Hence, at this juncture the Commission is not
inclined to increase any tariff hike.
Revenue Gap/(Surplus)
Petitioner Submission
8.4 The Petitioner has submitted that accumulated Revenue Gap from True-
up, APR and ARR for FY 22-23 to FY 24-25 at tariff Order May 31, 2023
without considering carrying cost is as under:
Table 145: Accumulated Revenue Gap without carrying cost at proposed Tariff for
FY 2024-25.
Particulars Petition
8.5 The Petitioner prays to approve the cumulative revenue gap till FY 2024-
25 as proposed by the Petitioner along with carrying cost and allow it to
either recover of the same through tariff in the ensuing year or allow
financing cost with recovery of the gap in future years. It is pertinent to
mention that the Hon’ble Commission has approved a cumulative gap of
Rs 6335.68 crores till FY 2021-22 without any viable treatment of the
same for the petitioner.
Commission Analysis
8.8 In response the Petitioner has asked to give time extension of 4 weeks
(i.e. till February 15, 2024).
8.9 On February 14, 2024, via letter no. 29, File No.
CE(C&R)/Rev/2485/2020/P-IV, the Petitioner has submitted additional
information related to the tariff proposal and tariff schedule for FY 2024-
25, along with prior period expenditures for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22,
based on the restated annual accounts for those years.
8.10 On February 21, 2024, via letter no. 10 of 2023/539 the Commission had
8.12 Since the Petitioner has not adhered to the timeline specified in the
provision of JSERC (Terms & Condition for Determination of Distribution
Tariff) Regulation, 2020. Hence the Commission disallow carrying cost in
the instant petition.
8.14 Based on the approved value of Truing up for FY 2022-23 and APR for FY
2023-24 the cumulative Revenue Gap/(Surplus) approves by the
Commission till FY 2023-24 is given below:
8.15 Based on the approved ARR and revenue from existing tariff, the
Commission approves the Revenue Gap/(Surplus) for FY 2024-25 as
shown below:
Particulars FY 2024-25
Opening Gap/(Surplus) 3309.42
Revenue Gap/(Surplus) created during the Year (314.30)
Total Revenue Gap/(Surplus 2995.12
9.1 As per clause 2.2 of the JSERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination
of Distribution Tariff) Regulations, 2020, the Commission shall determine
wheeling tariff, cross-subsidy surcharge, additional surcharge and other
Open Access (OA) related charges. The relevant extract of the Regulations
has been reproduced below:
“2.2
…
Provided further that where any category of consumer has been
permitted open access under Section 42 of the Act, the Commission
shall determine the wheeling tariff, cross-subsidy surcharge,
additional surcharge and other open access related charges in
accordance with these Regulations and JSERC (Intra State Open
Access) Regulations, 2016, as amended from time to time”.
Wheeling Charges
6.7 For such period until accounts are segregated, the Licensee
shall prepare an Allocation Statement to apportion costs and
revenues to respective business. The Allocation Statement,
approved by the Board of Directors of the Licensee, shall be
accompanied with an explanation of the basis and
methodology used for segregation, which should be consistent
over the Control Period.
Share of
Share of Retail
Particulars Wheeling
Supply
Business
O&M Cost
Employee cost 40% 60%
A&G Expense 50% 50%
R&M Cost 10% 90%
Power purchase (Inc. Trans. Charges and
100% 0%
RPO)
Interest on security deposit 100% 0%
Interest Cost 10% 90%
Interest on working capital 90% 10%
Depreciation 10% 90%
Return on Equity 10% 90%
Less: NTI 90% 10%
9.4 The segregation of ARR into Wires and Supply Business as approved by
the Commission for FY 2024-25 is shown below:
Share
Share of
Share of Share of of
ARR for Wheeling
Particulars Retail Wheeling Retail
FY 24-25 Business
Supply Business Supply
(Rs Cr)
(Rs Cr)
O&M Cost
Employee cost 40% 60% 273.78 109.51 164.27
A&G Expense 50% 50% 123.93 61.96 61.96
R&M Cost 10% 90% 319.49 31.95 287.54
Power purchase
(Inc. Trans. 100% 0% 6,267.97 6,267.97 0.00
Charges and RPO)
Interest on security
100% 0% 49.86 49.86 0.00
deposit
Interest Cost 10% 90% 525.91 52.59 473.32
Interest on working
90% 10% 28.01 25.20 2.80
capital
Depreciation 10% 90% 513.93 51.39 462.54
Return on Equity 10% 90% 517.45 51.74 465.70
Less: NTI 90% 10% 544.00 489.60 54.40
Total ARR 8,076.33 6,212.60 1,863.74
9.5 In the absence of an asset register, and in order to estimate the ratio of
fixed assets at various voltage levels, the Commission has considered the
network details of Petitioner as on record with the Commission on the
premise that the high voltage and low voltage assets have been created
simultaneously. Thus, the depreciation of all HT and LT assets is
assumed to be at the similar level.
9.6 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has failed to submit the
details of Power Sub-station (PSS) capacity/quantity and estimated costs.
In this regard, the Commission has directed the Petitioner to submit the
details of Power Sub-station (PSS) capacity/quantity and estimated costs.
In reply to discrepancies note the Petitioner has partially submitted the
Table 150: Estimated Cost of PSS (Rs Lakh) as approved by the Commission
9.7 Based on the above data, the estimated present cost of assets,
apportioned into different voltage levels is depicted in the table below:
9.8 Based on the voltage wise asset bifurcation, the Wires Business ARR at
respective voltage levels, is depicted in the table below:
Table 154: Voltage-wise ARR (Rs. Crore) of wire business as approved by the
Commission
9.9 The Wires Business ARR for different voltage levels as approved by the
Commission has been apportioned between lower voltage levels in the
ratio of voltage-wise energy sales and stacked accordingly in line with the
methodology adopted by the Petitioner earlier in the Order. The consumer
voltage and category wise energy sales as approved by the Commission
has been allocated to different voltage levels as depicted in the table
below:
Voltage-wise Aggregated
Category Voltage level
Sales sales
LT 6,577
Domestic 11 kV 24 6,601
33 kV and Above -
LT 1,036
Commercial/Non Domestic 11 kV - 1,036
33 kV and Above -
LT 181
Irrigation / IAS 11 kV - 181
33 kV and Above -
Voltage-wise Aggregated
Category Voltage level
Sales sales
LT 278
Industrial 11 kV 1,198 3,079
33 kV and Above 1,604
LT 28
Institution 11 kV 21 159
33 kV and Above 110
Total sales All voltage level 11,055.39 11,055.39
9.10 Accordingly, the voltage wise energy sales ratio, as approved by the
Commission is provided in the table below:
9.11 The voltage wise Wires Business ARR (allocated earlier in the ratio of fixed
assets), is now stacked from higher to lower voltage levels, based on
energy sales ratio, as tabulated below:
9.12 Based on the above, the voltage-wise Wheeling Charges for FY 2024-25
as approved by the Commission has been tabulated below:
Wheeling Tariff
Voltage Categories ARR (Rs. Crore) Sales (MU)
(Rs./kWh)
LT 1,734 8,100 2.14
11 kV 85 1,242 0.68
33 kV and above 45 1,713 0.26
9.13 The cost of supply is defined as the sum of all costs including the cost of
power incurred by a distribution utility to supply electricity to a group of
consumers.
9.15 Also, clause 8.3 of the Tariff Policy, 2016 states that the Commission
should determine a roadmap so that tariffs are brought within ± 20% of
the average cost of supply. The relevant excerpts of the Policy have been
reproduced below:
…..”
9.16 Further, if strict commercial principles are to be followed, then the tariffs
for each category of consumers is to be set based on the cost of supply
for each category. However, it is difficult to determine the same pertaining
to the issues of data adequacy.
9.17 The Commission is of the view that waiting indefinitely for the required
data is not prudent and therefore has decided to initiate the computation
of voltage wise cost of supply based on the data made available by the
Petitioner as of now, which, to a great extent would reflect the actual
voltage wise cost of supply.
9.18 In view of the same, the Commission has decided to follow the
methodology proposed by the Hon’ble APTEL for the computation of
voltage wise cost of supply in its Order dated May 10, 2012. The key
interpretations made by the Hon’ble APTEL has been summarized below:
9.20 Apportionment of Sales: The approved sales for the FY 2024-25 have been
Voltage-wise Aggregated
Category Voltage level
Sales sales
LT 6,577
Domestic 11 kV 24 6,601
33 kV and Above -
LT 1,036
Commercial/Non Domestic 11 kV - 1,036
33 kV and Above -
LT 181
Irrigation / IAS 11 kV - 181
33 kV and Above -
LT 278
Industrial 11 kV 1,198 3,079
33 kV and Above 1,604
LT 28
Institution 11 kV 21 159
33 kV and Above 110
Total sales All voltage level 11,055.39 11,055.39
9.21 Voltage wise Technical losses: As per para 33 of the APTEL Order dated
May 10, 2012
9.22 The Commission has considered the technical loss levels at 13% for FY
2023-24 as approved in the relevant chapter of this Order and
accordingly computed the voltage wise losses at different levels as
tabulated below:
Voltage
Dist. loss level Sales (MU) Input (MU) Tech Loss (MU)
Level
33 kV 3.00% 1,713.16 1,766.14 52.98
11kV 8.00% 1,242.37 1,350.40 108.03
LT 15.05% 8,099.86 9,535.27 1,435.40
11,055.39 12,707.34 1,651.95
“34. Thus Power Purchase Cost which is the major component of tariff
can be segregated for different voltage levels taking into account the
transmission and distribution losses, both commercial and technical,
for the relevant voltage level and upstream system.
Dist. Total
Voltage Tech Commercial
loss Sales Input Power
Level Loss Loss
level Purchase
33 kV 3.00% 1,713.16 1,766.14 52.98 - 1,766.14
11kV 8.00% 1,242.37 1,350.40 108.03 - 1,350.40
LT 15.05% 8,099.86 9,535.27 1,435.40 - 9,535.27
11,055.39 12,707.34 1,651.95 - 12,707.34
*Note: Commercial Loss considered as 0% as per the AT&C Loss Trajectory approved by the Commission
9.25 Allocation of power purchase cost for different voltage levels: The Net
power purchase cost approved by the Commission has been allotted to
different voltage levels as tabulated below:
Voltage-
Dist.
Net APPC wise PP
Volt Level loss Sales (MU) Input (MU)
(Rs./kWh) Cost
level
(Rs./kWh)
33 kV 3.00% 1,713.16 1,766.14 4.74 4.89
11kV 8.00% 1,242.37 1,350.40 4.74 5.15
Voltage-
Dist.
Net APPC wise PP
Volt Level loss Sales (MU) Input (MU)
(Rs./kWh) Cost
level
(Rs./kWh)
LT 15.05% 8,099.86 9,535.27 4.74 5.58
Total 11,055.39 12,651.81 4.74 5.43
9.26 Network Cost: As per para 34 of the APTEL Order dated May 10, 2012
“34……
As segregated network costs are not available, all the other costs
such as Return on Equity, Interest on Loan, depreciation, interest
on working capital and O&M costs can be pooled and apportioned
equitably, on pro-rata basis, to all the voltage levels including the
appellant’s category to determine the cost of supply.
….”
9.27 As per the above methodology, the Commission has calculated a uniform
network cost for all the categories as tabulated below:
9.28 The voltage wise cost of supply for FY 2024-25 as approved by the
Commission has been tabulated below:
9.29 The Commission has determined the Cross-Subsidy Surcharge as per the
methodology outlined in the National Tariff Policy 2016. The methodology
Where,
S is the surcharge;
Provided that the surcharge shall not exceed 20% of the tariff applicable
to the category of the consumers seeking open access.”
9.31 Weighted average purchase cost at the DISCOMs for CSS computation
works out to be Rs 4.70 per unit by considering the Power Purchase Cost
of Rs. 6,211.66 Crore (considering transmission charges) and Power
Purchase Quantum of 13,222.16 MU as approved by the Commission at
the Distribution Periphery.
9.32 The Tariff Policy stipulates that the CSS shall not exceed 20% of the tariff
applicable to the category of the consumers seeking Open Access.
Accordingly, the CSS approved by the Commission for FY 2024-25 is
summarized below:
9.33 All consumers who wish to avail Open Access will be levied no charge for
the use of distribution network other than wheeling charge and CSS.
Petitioner’s Submission
10.1 The Petitioner has submitted that it has proposed Tariff for the Electrical
Vehicle charging station. The rationale for the same is described in the
below paragraphs.
d) Fast Charging Stations (FCS) which are meant only for 100% in
house / captive utilization, for example buses of a company, would
be free to decide the charging specifications as per its requirement.
ii. The PCS providers are free to create Charging Hubs and to
install additional number of Kiosk / Chargers in addition to
the minimum number of chargers prescribed above.
10.4 The Petitioner has submitted that as per MoP Guideline the tariff can be
determined as follows:
“the cost of supply to a public charging station will be 0.8 times of ACoS
during solar hours and 1.2 times of ACoS during non-solar hours”
10.5 Accordingly, the Petitioner has proposed a new category by the name ‘EV
Charging, may be created in the Rate schedule keeping in view the
guidelines of Ministry of Power. The Same is as follows.
10.7 The Petitioner has further submitted that the consumer should take
Commission Analysis
10.9 Further, EV charging tariffs refer to the pricing structure for charging
electric vehicles at public or private charging stations. These tariffs vary
based on factors like the type of charger, the location, and the time of
day. Accordingly, the Commission approve various pricing tariff structure
for different type of consumer as discuss below.
10.11 Further, the consumer shall be required to bear all expenses related to
connection/related electricity infrastructure charges, wherever
applicable. However, if consumer is having an EV vehicle for commercial
purpose, the consumer has to register the same with municipal
authorities (if municipal authority has provisions for it) and
disclose/declare the same to the Petitioner. In case no such registration
exists, the consumer has to self-declare the same to Petitioner.
10.14 Based on above excerpt, the Commission approve EV tariff for Public
Charging Stations as follows:
11.1 The Ministry of Power, Government of India has notified “the Electricity
(Promoting Renewable Energy through Green Energy Open Access) Rules,
2022. On 6th June 2022 (amended on 27th Jan 2023) to facilitate use of
Renewable Energy by the consumers and further accelerate India’s RE
program’s. SERC’s/JERC’s vide letter dated 10.10.2022 were informed to
take appropriate action for determination of Green Tariff under Rule 4 (2)
(C) (c).
Petitioner Submission
11.2 The Petitioner has submitted that there are various methods of RE
procurement existing in the Indian Market. One of these innovative
methods is the purchase of electricity through green energy tariff. That
would create a demand of green energy to be purchased by the
distribution utilities. The Petitioner has also submitted that Green Tariff
is a price structure offered by an RE attributes. Further, Green Power
Tariff will have the following advantage:
Consumers will have the option to opt for Green Energy under
Green Power Tariff since it is entirely voluntary.
11.3 The Petitioner has further submitted that as per clause 4.2 (3) the Green
Tariff shall comprise of average pooled power purchase cost of Renewable
Energy, Cross subsidy charges if any, Service charges covering the
prudent cost of the distribution licensee for providing the green energy.
11.4 Based on the above submission the Petitioner has computed each
component of Green tariff as given below:
The petitioner has submitted that in cases where the demand for
green power is considerably higher than what is available from
the existing tied up sources, additional RE procurement shall be
required. In such a scenario, generation from conventional
sources would be required to be backed down. For the ensuing
year FY 2024-25, the Petitioner is envisaging that the demand for
green energy shall be met through the existing tied up renewable
sources.
Parameter (Rs./kWh)
Avg. Pooled Price of RE 3.12
Per Unit Transmission Cost 0.41
Total Cost of RE 3.53
Added Distribution Loss @ 24% 0.84
Avg. pooled power purchase
cost of renewable energy 4.38
grossed up with T&D Loss
Parameter (Rs./kWh)
Avg. Pooled power purchase cost
of renewable energy grossed up 4.38
with T&D Loss
Distribution Service Charge 2.52
Cross Subsidy Surcharge 1.69
Green Power Tariff 8.59
Commission Analysis
11.5 In accordance with the Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act, 2003, the
Commission is mandated to promote adoption of Renewable Energy (RE).
Therefore, the Commission has introduced Green Energy Tariff in this
Order as an optional/voluntary arrangement for the consumers who are
willing to procure RE Power from DISCOMs for the purpose of reducing
their carbon footprint and seeking certification to this effect.
11.6 Such Green Tariff would be in addition to regular tariff approved in this
Tariff Order. The Commission observes that the concept of Green Tariff
has been well appreciated by many stakeholders across the state as it
provides opportunity for consumers willing to meet their power
requirement through green energy sources, however, the concept is still
at nascent stage with limited participation.
11.7 For the calculation of the Green Energy Tariff, the Commission has
introduced a formula that considers the difference between the weighted
average rate of renewable energy (RE) power and the weighted average
rate of the energy charge (variable charge) of non-renewable energy (Non-
RE) sources.
11.8 Based on the above discussion the weighted average rate of renewable
energy (RE) Power and the weighted average rate of energy charge
(Variable Charge) of non-renewable (Non-RE) sources as tabulated
hereunder:
FY25 (Projected)
Particulars
Rs/kWh
Weightage Average Pooled Price of RE (A) 3.28
FY25 (Projected)
Particulars
Rs/kWh
Weightage Average Pooled Price of RE (B) 3.07
Table 170: Difference between RE and Non-RE (A-B) in Rs/kWh as approved by the
Commission.
FY25
Particulars (Projected)
Rs/kWh
Difference between RE & Non-RE Power (Variable Cost) (A-B)
0.21
in Rs./kWh
11.9 Based on the above computation the Commission approves Green Energy
Tariff as Rs 0.21/kWh to the Consumer opting for meeting its power
requirement through RE Sources. Such Green Energy Tariff would be in
addition to regular tariff approved in this Order.
11.10 All Consumer shall be eligible for opting Renewable Energy power on
payment of Green Power Tariff.
11.11 The Consumer will have option to select the quantum of green power to
be purchased in the step of 10% and going up to 100% of the
consumption.
11.12 The Distribution Licensee will levy Green Power Tariff only for percentage
of consumption opted by the Consumer.
11.14 The total tariff earned under “Green Energy Tariff” will be considered as
a part of the revenue/tariff income of the Petitioner. Further, the
Petitioner must file all details along with each ARR/Tariff filings with a
list of consumers opting for it. Also, the Petitioner to ensure that the total
consumption of these consumers must be met by renewable energy
source.
Petitioner Submission
12.1 The Petitioner has submitted that during FY 2022-23, it has recorded the
following key transaction, which resulted in restatement of earlier period
balances as per the provision of IND AS 8 (Indian Accounting Standards).
12.2 The Petitioner has further submitted that the aforesaid reinstatement has
been carried out in the following manner.
12.3 Accordingly, the Petitioner has been recalculated the Aggregate Revenue
12.4 Further, the Petitioner has submitted that recalculated the Aggregate
Revenue Requirement for FY 2020-21 based on the restated account as
per the Electricity Act, 2003 and as per the provision of the Jharkhand
State Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and Condition for
Determination of Distribution Tariff) Regulation, 2020.
12.5 The Petitioner has also submitted that True-up for FY 2020-21 and FY
2021-22 has already been filed before this Commission in November 2021
and November 2022 respectively. Thus, the revised ARR for FY 2020-21
and FY 2021-22 based on restated audited account is being submitted as
prior period expenditure for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22 before this
Commission as an additional submission of petition for approval of True-
up for FY 2022-23, Annual Performance Review (APR) for FY 2023-24 and
approval of Aggregate Revenue Requirement for FY 2024-25 already filed
before this Commission on 29.11.2023.
Commission Analysis
audited account was submitted to the Commission just before the public
notice. Hence, this additional information was not published for the
public consultation and public at large could not respond to the revised
numbers. Therefore, the Commission in this order has not considered the
restated account for FY 2020-21 and FY 2021-22.
Petitioner’s Submission
Category/
Slabs EC FC
Sub-Category
DS-R 8.25 / kWh 75.00 / kW / Month
Domestic (DS) DS-U 9.50 / kWh 100.00 / kW / Month
DS HT 9.50/ kVAh 100.00 / kVA / Month
Commission Analysis
13.2 Based on the above discussions, the summary of Tariff approved by the
Commission for FY 2024-25 as computed hereunder:
Rural (More than 5 kW) Rs/kWh 6.10 Rs/kW/Mon 120.00 Rs/kWh 6.10 Rs/kW/Mon 120.00
Commercial
Urban (More than 5 kW) Rs/kWh 6.65 Rs/kW/Mon 200.00 Rs/kWh 6.65 Rs/kW/Mon 200.00
Consumer Tariff
Ceiling Tariff
The Tariffs approved below are Ceiling Tariffs and the Licensee is at liberty to
Supply at lower and more competitive rates based on the requirement of the
Consumers. However, this reduced recovery shall be attributable to the Licensee
and shall not be recoverable in the ARR.
Applicability:
This schedule shall apply to private residential premises for domestic use of
household electric appliances such as Radios, Fans, Televisions, Desert Coolers,
Air Conditioner, etc. including motor pumps for lifting water for domestic
purposes and other household electrical appliances not covered under any other
schedule.
This rate is also applicable for supply to religious institutions such as Temples,
Gurudwaras, Mosques, Church and Burial/ Crematorium grounds, Rural
Drinking Water Schemes and other recognised charitable institutions, where no
rental/fees are charged for the energy needs and for its products and services.
This rate is also applicable for all consumers with contracted demand of upto 5
kW mixed, commercial, industrial, educational institutions, drinking water
schemes or for any other purpose, except streetlight connections and
agriculture/allied connections.
Category of Services:
Domestic Service -Urban: areas covered by Nagar Nigam, Nagar Parishad and
Nagar Panchayat.
Service Character:
a) For Rural: AC, 50 Cycles, Single Phase at 230 Volts, Three Phase at 400
Volts.
b) For Urban: AC, 50 Cycles, Single Phase at 230 Volts, Three Phase at 400
Volts.
Tariff:
As the Fixed Charges are applicable per connection basis, there is little
relevance of load for Tariff purpose, the Petitioner should not normally
inspect consumer premises on the pretext of load verification.
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment : In accordance with
Clause VIII: of Terms & Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this
Tariff Order.
Domestic Service - HT
Applicability:
This schedule shall apply to private residential premises for domestic use of
household electric appliances such as Radios, Fans, Televisions, Desert Coolers,
Air Conditioner, etc. including motor pumps for lifting water for domestic
purposes and other household electrical appliances not covered under any other
schedule.
Category of Services:
This Schedule shall apply for domestic connection in Housing Colonies/ Housing
Complex/Houses of multi storied buildings purely for residential use for single
point metered supply, with power supply at 33kV or 11kV voltage level. DS-HT
consumers, who supply power to individual households, the average per unit
charges billed to an individual consumer shall not exceed 105% of average per
unit cost paid to the Petitioner. This additional 5% allowed reflects the internal
distribution losses in housing complex and administrative and distribution
costs.
Service Character:
Tariff:
Billing Demand: The Billing Demand shall be the Maximum Demand recorded
during the month or 75% of Contract Demand whichever is higher. The penalty
on exceeding Billing Demand will be applicable in accordance with Clause I:
Penalty for exceeding Billing/ Contract Demand of Terms & Conditions of
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of Terms
& Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Applicability:
This schedule shall apply to all consumers for use of electrical energy for
Agriculture purposes including tube wells and processing of the agricultural
produce, confined to Chaff-Cutter, Thresher, Cane crusher and Rice-Hauler,
when operated by the agriculturist in the field or farm and does not include Rice
mills, Flour mills, Oil mills, Dal mills.
Service Character:
Tariff:
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of Terms
& Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Commercial Services
Applicability:
This schedule shall apply to all consumers, using electrical energy for light, fan
and power loads for non-domestic purposes like shops, hospitals (govt. or
private), nursing homes, clinics, dispensaries, restaurants, hotels, clubs, guest
houses, marriage houses, public halls, show rooms, workshops, central air-
conditioning units, offices (govt. or private), commercial establishments,
cinemas, X-ray plants, schools and colleges (govt. or private), boarding/ lodging
houses, libraries (govt. or private), research institutes (govt. or private), railway
stations, fuel - oil stations, service stations (including vehicle service stations),
All India Radio / T.V. installations, printing presses, commercial trusts /
societies, Museums, poultry farms, banks, theatres, common facilities in multi-
storied commercial office/buildings, Dharmshalas, public Electric Vehicles
Charging stations and such other installations not covered under any other tariff
schedule whose Contracted Demand is greater than 5 kW and less than or equal
to 100 kVA (or equivalent in terms of HP or kW). The equivalent HP for 100 kVA
shall be 114 HP and the equivalent kW for 100 kVA shall be 85 kW.
Service Category:
Service Character:
Rural: AC 50 Cycles, Single phase at 230 Volts or Three Phase at 400 Volts.
Urban: AC 50 Cycles, Single phase at 230 Volts or Three Phase at 400 Volts.
Tariff:
Billing Demand: The Billing Demand shall be the Maximum Demand recorded
during the month or 50% of Contract Demand whichever is higher. The penalty
on exceeding Contract Demand will be applicable in accordance with Clause I:
Penalty for exceeding Billing/ Contract Demand of Terms & Conditions of
Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of
Terms & Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Applicability:
This schedule shall apply to all industrial units having a Contracted Load more
than 5 kW and less than or equal to 100 kVA (or equivalent in terms of HP or
kW). The equivalent HP for 100 kVA shall be 114 HP and the equivalent kW for
100 kVA shall be 85 kW.
Service Character:
Low Tension Industrial Service (LTIS): AC, 50 Cycles, Single Phase supply at
230 Volts or Three Phase Supply at 400 Volts.
Tariff:
Billing Demand: The Billing Demand shall be the Maximum Demand recorded
during the month or 50% of Contract Demand whichever is higher. The penalty
on exceeding Contract Demand will be applicable in accordance with Clause I:
Penalty for exceeding Billing/ Contract Demand of Terms & Conditions of
Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order. In case Recorded Demand
is more than 100 kVA/85 kW for any month for more than three instances within
a Financial Year, the average of the Maximum Demand recorded during such
instances shall be treated as the new Contract Demand for the purpose of billing
of future months and the consumer will have to get into a new Agreement under
the HTS category.
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of Terms
& Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
HT Services
Applicability:
All the consumers drawing power at voltage level at 6.6 kV and above except
Domestic-HT consumers and HT- Institutional Consumers. High Tension Special
Service (HTSS): This tariff schedule shall apply to all consumers who have a
contracted demand of 300 KVA and more for induction/arc Furnace. In case of
induction/arc furnace consumers (applicable for existing and new consumers),
the contract demand shall be based on the total capacity of the induction/arc
furnace and the equipment as per manufacturer technical specification and not
on the basis of measurement. This tariff schedule will not apply to casting units
having induction furnace of melting capacity of 500 Kg or below.
Service Character:
High Tension Service (HTS): 50 Cycles, Three Phase at 6.6 kV/11 kV/33 kV/132
kV/220 kV/400 kV.
Tariff:
Billing Demand: The Billing Demand shall be the Maximum Demand recorded
during the month or 75% of Contract Demand, whichever is higher. The penalty
on exceeding Contract Demand will be applicable in accordance with Clause I:
Penalty for exceeding Billing/ Contract Demand of Terms & Conditions of
Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Voltage Rebate: In accordance with Clause IV: Voltage Rebate of Terms &
Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of Terms
& Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
TOD Tariff: In accordance with Clause VII: ToD Tariff as provided in section
on Terms & Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Street Light
This tariff schedule shall apply for use of Street Lighting system.
Applicability:
This tariff schedule shall apply for use of Street Lighting system, including single
system in corporation, municipality, Notified Area Committee, panchayats etc.,
and also in areas not covered by municipalities and Notified Area Committee
provided the number of lamps served from a point of supply is not less than 5.
Service Character:
Street Light Service (SS): AC, 50 cycles, Single phase at 230 Volts or Three phase
at 400 Volts
Tariff:
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of Terms
& Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
HT Institutional Services
This tariff schedule shall apply for use of Railway Traction, Military Engineering
Services and Other Distribution Licensees.
Applicability:
Railway Traction (RTS) and Military Engineering Services (MES): This tariff
schedule shall apply for use of railway traction and Military Engineering Services
(MES) for a mixed load in defence cantonment and related area.
Service Character:
Railway Traction Service (RTS): AC, 50 cycles, Single, two or three phase at 25
kV/ 132 kV.
Military Engineering Services (MES): AC, 50 cycles, three phase at 6.6 kV and
above.
Other Distribution Licensees: AC, 50 cycles, three phase at 6.6 kV and above
Tariff:
Billing Demand: The Billing Demand shall be the Maximum Demand recorded
during the month or 75% of Contract Demand, whichever is higher. The penalty
Voltage Rebate: In accordance with Clause IV: Voltage Rebate of Terms &
Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment: In accordance with
Clause VIII: Prompt Payment Rebate and Rebate for Online Payment of
Terms & Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
TOD Tariff: In accordance with Clause VII: ToD Tariff as provided in section on
Terms & Conditions of Supply as provided in Chapter 15 of this Tariff Order.
RPO Compliance: RPO Compliance for Sale to Other Licensees, RTS and MES
shall be made by the first Licensee which sells the power viz., in case TSL has
procured such quantum of power from JBVNL then the onus to comply with RPO
will be with JBVNL only.
Temporary Connections
Applicability:
a) Temporary tariff shall be equivalent to 1.5 times of the applicable fixed and
energy charges for temporary connections falling in each prescribed tariff
category with all other terms and conditions of tariff remaining the same.
Tariff:
The Commission had notified the JSERC (Rooftop Solar PV Grid Interaction
Systems and Net/Gross Metering) Regulations, 2015, on November 10, 2015,
and further notified its 1st amendment as JSERC (Rooftop Solar PV Grid
Interaction Systems and Net/Gross Metering) (1st Amendment) Regulations,
2019. The Tariff for sale of surplus power by Gross/Net metering of Rooftop Solar
PV for FY 2023-24 for such eligible consumers of the Petitioner shall be as under:
The tariff approved as above for FY 2023-24 shall remain effective till the issue
of subsequent Tariff Order/Individual Order as the case may be.
The Miscellaneous Charge will applicable as per the Tariff Order dated May 31,
2023 till further Order.
The charges in this tariff schedule do not include charges on account of State
Electricity Duty/Surcharge to the consumers under the State Electricity Duty
Act and the rules framed there under as amended from time to time and any
other Statutory levy which may take effect from time to time.
* Note:
1) It is clarified that, if a consumer who is eligible to get supply at 11kV as per classification
as mentioned in Clause 4.3 of JSERC (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2015 and
then the consumer opts for connection at 33kV then consumer shall be eligible for voltage
rebate of 3%. Similarly, if a consumer who is eligible to get supply at 33kV as per Clause
4.3 of JSERC (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations, 2015 and opts for connection at
132kV then consumer shall be eligible for voltage rebate of 5%. Further, no voltage rebate
shall be applicable above voltage level of 132 kV. It is further clarified that the existing
consumers at 11kV and 33kV opts for higher voltage, rebate shall be applicable for such
consumers.
2) The above rebate will be available only on monthly basis and consumer with arrears shall
not be eligible for the above rebate. However, the applicable rebate shall be allowed to
consumers with outstanding dues, wherein such dues have been stayed by the
appropriate Courts.
The Load factor rebate shall be allowed to all the consumers whose load factor
exceeds 65%. For any ‘X’ % increase in the load factor over and above 65%, the
rebate shall be allowed at the rate of ‘X’ % on the total energy charges
corresponding to total energy consumption of the consumer subject to a
maximum ceiling rebate of 15%. The above rebate will be available only on
monthly basis and consumer with arrears shall not be eligible for the above
rebate. However, the applicable rebate shall be allowed to consumers with
outstanding dues, wherein such dues have been stayed by the appropriate
Courts.
from time to time, shall be installed with Shunt Capacitors to meet the Power
Factor requirements. For existing consumer, the Petitioner should first serve one
month’s notice to all such consumers who do not have or have defective shunt
capacitors. In case the consumers do not get the capacitor installed/replaced
within the notice period, the consumer shall be levied a surcharge at 5% on the
total billed amount charge (metered or flat), till they have installed the required
capacitors.
The due date for making payment of energy bills or other charges shall be as
specified in Clauses 10.1.5 of the JSERC (Electricity Supply Code) Regulations,
2015, as amended from time to time. Prompt Payment Rebate shall be allowed
for payment of bills by the Consumers in accordance with Clauses 10.76 of the
JSERC (Terms and Conditions for Determination of Distribution Tariff)
Regulations, 2020, as amended from time to time. Further, a rebate of 1.00%
shall be allowed on the billed amount for payment within the due date of the
entire billed amount made either through online or any digital mode subject to
a maximum ceiling rebate of Rs. 250 against the billed amount. Further no
rebate shall be allowed after due date irrespective of the mode of payment.
Charges for the respective Consumer Category. For such consumers, the
Petitioner shall refund the entire Security Deposit within one month from the
date of installation of such prepaid meters.
The Commission in its earlier Order dated October 01, 2020 issued following
directives: -
However, till the time the above mechanism is implemented (i.e., December
31, 2020) for LT-Domestic, earlier mechanism for recovering fixed charge
on the basis of the below mechanism specified in its earlier Order dated
February 28, 2019 shall be applicable.
FCr = FC x (20-Y)/20
FC = Total Fixed Charges for the consumer for the Billing Period.
FCr = Fixed Charges recoverable by the Petitioner for the Billing Period.
The Petitioner is directed to adjust from the monthly fixed charges as per
the above specified mechanism based on the SAIDI recorded in the
previous quarter.”
In view of the above, the Commission reiterate its direction that the Petitioner
shall submit a report on implementation of the above, within 30 days of issuance
of this Order and implement the same from the subsequent billing cycle.
Point of Supply
The Power supply shall normally be provided at a single point for the entire
premises. In certain categories like coal mines power may be supplied at more
than one point on the request of consumer subject to technical feasibility. But
in such cases metering and billing shall be done separately for each point.
Dishonoured Cheques
Stopped/Defective Meters
In case of meter being out of order from the period before which no pattern of
consumption is available, the provisional average bill shall be issued on the basis
of Sanctioned/Contract Load on following Load Factor applicable to respective
categories:
Sale of Energy
No consumer shall be allowed to sell the electricity purchased from the Licensee
to any other person/entity. In case of DS-HT consumers, who supply power to
individual households, the average per unit charge billed to an individual
consumer shall not exceed 105% of average per unit cost paid to the Petitioner.
This additional 5% allowed reflects the internal distribution losses in housing
complex and administrative and distribution costs.
Conversion Factors
The following shall be the conversion factors, as and where applicable: (PF=0.85
to 0.95):
16.1 The directives issued by the Commission in its earlier Orders, its
compliance by the Petitioner and further view of the Commission on
compliance is tabulated below:
Views of the
Directives Status
Commission
1. Fixed Asset Register
The Commission had directed The Petitioner has submitted the The Commission
the Petitioner to prepare an substantial amount of assets has observes that the
FAR before filing of the next been added post formation of the petitioner has not
petition. company on 06.01.2014 and such been able to comply
additions have been duly audited in with its self-declared
Further, the Commission had the respective years. The company target.
also directed the Petitioner to has records for the assets so added
comply with observations of in respective years. In order to The Commission take
statutory authorities/auditors further improve, the company serious note of the
on the matter of Verification & appointed M/s Deloitte for physical same.
Monitoring of Fixed verification and preparation of Fixed
Assets/CAPEX/Inventory and Asset Register, determination of
Maintenance of proper records historical cost of fixed assets and
preferably in digital form for providing support in migration of the
observance of statutory asset register into SAP etc. The work
provisions. has already started in the year 2023
and there is significant progress in
Furthermore, the Petitioner had this area.
directed to put a robust
Integrated Accounts & The preparation of FAR is an
Financial Management System exhaustive and extensive exercise
to minimize the time for covering physical verification of all
preparation of Annual 33/11kV PSS, all 33kV feeders and
Accounts & filing of on sample basis 11kV feeders and
Petitions/Business DTRs, their historical cost
Plans/APR's. in time estimation which requires
significant effort and resources.
Views of the
Directives Status
Commission
preparation. It is expected that the
work will be finished by March 2024
2. Segregation into Retail & Wheeling Supply of Business
According to the Regulation It is understood that segregation of The Commission
6.10 of the Tariff Regulations accounts into wheeling and retail observes that the
2020, separate accounting has would require the drawing of Fixed petitioner has not
to be done for Wheeling & Retail Asset Register, without which 100% been able to comply
supply of Business which has accuracy in such segregation may with directive of the
not been the case till now. not be feasible. Commission.
As per Regulation 6.10 of Tariff The petitioner is seriously The Commission take
Regulations 2020, until the contemplating to segregate the serious note of the
accounts are not segregated, an business into retail and wheeling of same.
Allocation Statement shall be electricity after the process of FAR is
prepared and submitted to completed.
apportion the costs and
revenues after the approval of The petitioner is continuously
the Board of Directors. monitoring the progress of FAR.
3. Voltage Wise-Cost of Supply
The Petitioner has submitted that it had The Commission
appointed an agency for conducting observes that the
Voltage-Wise Cost of Supply as per petitioner has not
directive of Hon’ble Commission. The been able to comply
The Commission has noted the agency completed its study and
with directive of the
submissions of the Petitioner. submitted Voltage-Wise Cost of Supply
Commission even
The Petitioner is directed to for FY 17-18 which JBVNL
subsequently submitted along with its after more than
submit the complete study completion of 1 Year.
last Tariff Petition for FY 23-24 by
along with all its annexures
taking proportionality values for VCoS.
and clear methodology used for The Commission take
calculation of VCoS within 1 Further, the Petitioner is in process of serious note of the
month from the date of issue of conducting a similar study for VCoS same.
this Order. and the preparation of the scope of work
and tender work is in progress. The
petitioner would submit the work
progress once the tender is finalized and
the tender for the same is awarded
4. Employee Performance Appraisal
The Commission has observed The Petitioner has submitted that The Commission has
that the Petitioner’s is yet to the employee performance appraisal noted the submission
submit any report employee is being done internally and the of the Petitioner.
performance appraisal to the parameter such as new connection
Commission. request, collection target, billing Further, the
target is being mapped to concerned Commission
The Commission had also officers. However, quality of supply redirected the
Views of the
Directives Status
Commission
observed that the Petitioner has parameters is very difficult to Petitioner to expedite
made some interim quantify and linked to respective the process.
arrangement. officers.
Views of the
Directives Status
Commission
about Electricity Tariffs, the consumers. Apart from Urja Commission
Standards of Performance and Melas, the utility has been redirected the
Other Regulations as conducting various other schemes Petitioner to expedite
applicable. and making consumer aware the process.
through various other initiatives
such as urja sambad, whatsapp
groups involving local representees,
campaign through papers and
cartoons ads, educational videos,
miking and camps etc.
8. Submission of impact of analysis and requisite data along with proposal for introduction of
TOD Tariff
The Commission had observed On implementation of TOD tariff, an The Commission
that the Petitioner has not internal analysis has been done for observes that the
submitted impact analysis and the HT consumers and it was found petitioner has not
requisite data for ToD Tariff. that the utility will be benefited if it been able to comply
Accordingly, The Commission is being implemented. with directive of the
had directed the Petitioner to Commission.
submit the same at the earliest However, the feedback of the same
in its own interest. from HT consumers are not positive The Commission take
and they are reluctant for serious note of the
implementation of the TOD tariff as same.
of now.
Views of the
Directives Status
Commission
For smart meters that is being
implemented, the fixed charge
reduction will be automatically
calculated and passed on to the
consumers after reconciliation at the
end of the month.
10. Testing of Pre-paid Meter from Third party meter testing labs
The Commission had directed The prepaid meters are being tested The Commission has
the Petitioner to test the by our MRT (Meter and Relay noted the submission
prepaid meters from testing) wing that was duly approved of the Petitioner.
empanelment party meter by our own procedures. The tender
testing labs approved by the for the testing is underway for 5% of
Commission before installation the prepaid meters from the
of prepaid meters at the empanelment agencies of the
consumers premises. Hon’ble commission.
17.1 The Commission directs the Petitioner to maintain the Fixed Assets
Register (FAR) considering the depreciation rates as specified in JSERC
Distribution Tariff Regulations and submit the status report to the
Commission along with FAR in the next tariff filing. The Petitioner is
directed to specifically comply with the observations of the statutory
authorities/auditors on the matter of Verification & Monitoring of Fixed
Assets/CAPEX/Inventory and Maintenance of proper records preferably
in digital form for observance of statutory provisions. The Petitioner
should also put in place a robust Integrated Accounts & Financial
Management System to minimize the time for preparation of Annual
Accounts & filing of Petitions/Business Plans/APR in time.
17.2 The Petitioner is directed to submit the itemized details of scraps and
store items along with the estimated values within 3 months from the
issue of this Order.
17.5 The then Principal Secretary Energy -B.K. Tripathi of State Government
of Jharkhand vide letter date 14.07.2014 as annexed in Annexure-2 had
intimated that released of Rs 1500 crores per annum towards resource
gap to the JUVNL (erstwhile J.S.E.B) will be to meet the
slashes/disallowance worked out by the Hon’ble Commission while fixing
the tariff. It has been found that this amount is not disbursed from FY
17.6 The distribution system plays a crucial role in the power delivery chain,
as it establishes the last mile connectivity with the ultimate consumers.
Consumers are paramount in this process, serving as the revenue
generators that sustain the entire power delivery chain, from generation
to distribution. Distribution service providers have undertaken numerous
commendable initiatives aimed at improving the system, reducing
distribution losses, enhancing the safety of both personnel and
equipment, and resolving issues related to meters and billing. However,
there remains a need for further action by licensees to address existing
challenges and ensure the continued reliability and efficiency of the
distribution system
17.8 The Commission directs the Petitioner not to purchase power under High
Price Day Ahead Market (HP- DAM) in the integrated Day Ahead Market
(I-DAM) segment.
17.9 The Commission has observed that the Petitioner has not provided the
detailed slab wise billing determinant (number of consumers, connected
load and energy sales) along with revenue for ARR period for FY 2023-24.
The Commission taking note of the non-compliance, directs the Petitioner
to provide the detailed slab/sub-slab wise billing determinants along with
revenue from the next Tariff filling failing which will lead to the
proceedings of the non-compliance of directive as per Regulations/Act.
17.11 The Petitioners are directed to ensure 100% feeder metering and DT
metering and separation of agriculture feeders.
17.12 There is lack of clarity on the interest of security deposited that has been
given to the consumers. Petitioners in its submission should clearly
demonstrate how much interest on security deposit was required to be
given and how much interest has been actually disbursed.
17.13 There are several upcoming opportunities for the Licensees to enhance
their nontariff income particularly from the broadband and 5G telecom
companies for installation of their equipment on the electric poles and
infrastructure of the licensees. The licensees are directed to develop a
business plan in accordance with JSERC (Facilitation of
Telecommunication Network) Regulation 2023 in this regard and submit
the same for the approval along with tariff of the Commission.
17.14 The Petitioners shall upload on its website the Petition filed before the
Commission along with all regulatory filings, information, particulars and
related documents, which shall be signed digitally and in searchable pdf
formats along with all Excel files and as per any other provision of the
Regulations and Orders of the Commission. The Petitioner shall also
ensure that these files are broken into such size which can be easily
downloaded and will not keep them in compressed form as the
stakeholders find it difficult to extract the files.
17.15 The details of all pending cases filed by Petitioners against the
Commission in various forums, along with their status, should be
provided alongside the ARR/Tariff filing each year.
17.16 The Petitioners are directed to submit DSM account details separately
from the power purchase along with each ARR/ Tariff fillings.
17.17 The list of Open Access consumers, categorized into Long Term, Short
Term, and Medium Term, should be provided along with their
consumption data and consumer category. This information should be
included in the Petition submitted alongside the ARR/Tariff filing each
year.
17.18 Wherever the opening values in the audited account doesn’t match with
the closing shown in the previous audited account, the reasons for the
same to be provided as part of audited accounts henceforth.
17.19 Provide the detailed breakup of CWIP claimed for the year along with the
Petition along with the ARR / Tariff filing each year.
17.22 The Petitioners are directed to ensure that the actual Power Purchased
Cost, including a detailed breakdown of each source, inter-state
transmission charges, and intra-state transmission charges, are
incorporated into the audited accounts.
17.24 The Petitioners are directed to ensure that actual power purchased (in
million units) and ex-bus energy delivered at the Discom periphery (in
million units), along with inter and intra-power purchase (in million
units) and inter and intra-state losses, are included in the audited
accounts henceforth.
17.25 The Commission has observed that the few formats the data is
incomplete. It has also been observed that the Excel files are not linked
and formula driven which delays the proceedings. Therefore, the
Petitioner is directed to ensure that all the Tariff and additional Formats
are completely filled and are with formulas and links.
17.27 The Petitioners are directed to enhance the quality of the distribution
network by implementing state-of-the-art technology and contemporary
technological solutions to address upcoming and new challenges in the
sector. Additionally, the Licensees are directed to prioritize institutional
capacity building, particularly focusing on operations related to smart
metering, prepaid charging infrastructure, demand response, time of use
(TOU), cyber security and privacy of data, and the utilization of AI tools.
17.28 The Petitioners are required to file quarterly progress reports before the
Commission on the implementation of Standard of Performance (SoP) as
per JSERC Regulations.
17.29 The Commission directs the Petitioners to follow the RPO trajectory set
by the Commission and submit RPO compliance along with Tariff Fillings
and other orders of the Commission from time to time.
17.30 The Commission directs that pre-paid meter/ smart meter be installed
for all new connections or replacement of faulty meters.
17.32 The Commission directs the Petitioner, that the Open Access shall be
allowed to those who wish to avail Open Access as per the provisions
outlined by the Commission in its Regulations, Orders and any
amendments from time to time.
17.34 The Petitioner is directed to do proper accounting with regard to MUs and
rates of captive/ internal consumption of electricity and captured the
same in the audited balance sheet under separate head. The Petitioner is
also directed to submit the complete details viz MUs consumed, tariff and
revenue booked along with every ARR / Tariff filling.
17.35 The Petitioner has directed that the direction of the earlier Tariff Orders
which have not been complied should be complied immediately.
17.36 Apart from the above directions the Petitioner should comply with the
directions provided at various places in this Tariff Order
17.37 The Petitioner is directed to review the comments of the Commission and
comply with the directives issued by the Commission with utmost
sincerity failing which necessary action in accordance to law shall be
initiated.
17.38 In light of the increasing need for reliable and safe power distribution,
and to minimize the risks associated with overhead power lines, it has
been decided to initiate the installation and expansion of underground
cable networks across various designated areas. This transition to
underground cabling is aimed at improving the overall quality of power
supply, reducing outages, and enhancing public safety.
Date: 30.09.2024
Place: Ranchi
Sd/- Sd/-
(Atul Kumar) (Mahendra Prasad)
MEMBER (Technical) MEMBER (Law)
List of public who participated in the Public Hearing and submitted their
Suggestions/Comments
Ranchi, 02/09/2024
188. Amit Sharma FJCCI
189. Sunil Gupta Laghu Udhyog Bharti
190. Kishor Mantri FJCCI, President
191. J K Agarwa Gajanan Ferro
192. Biraj Choudharyl FJCCI
193. Deb Kumar FJCCI
194. Pawan Kr Ranchi
195. Rajesh kr Mandal Ranchi
196. Ghanshyam Sharma Ranchi
197. Sourabh Jain JBVNL
198. Prem Kataruka Ranchi
199. Arun Chhanchharia Ranchi
200. Ajay Maroo Ex- Member, Rajya Sabha
201. Gaurav Kr. Garodia Ranchi
202. Sataya Naryan Prasad Parner RUBS & CO
203. Aditya FJCCI
Annexure-1
Minutes of Meeting
Annexure-2
Annexure-3