Interview Question
Interview Question
1 ripv1
classful
does not send subnet mask information in it’s
update
does not support authentication
EIGRP
Cisco owned private routing protocol,not been
supported by any other vendors;is not as mature
as OSPF.
Only a few networks designed by EIGRP,and is
getting less and less popular.
DUAL algorithm could be in SIA status, query
could spread out the whole network.
Can not build a hierarchy network with this
protocol.
Does not support TE.
rip v2
classless
2 Switching
STP
PVST
MSTP
HSRP
VRRP
GLBP
VLAN Configuration
VTP
Inter-vlan routing
Ehter-channel
Switching Security
HA among MSFC,SUP engines
3 Firewall
ACL
IP Inspection
Policy based inspection
IPS
Firewall failover
NAT, Static NAT
Routing
Preventing N/W attacks (refer asa
configuration guide)
4 VPN
IPSEC router to router vpn
GRE VPN
SSL VPN
WEB VPN
GET VPN
5 Load balancer
RAD
CSS
47XX series
6 Wan Optimizaion
Bluecoat
5 CPU hogs
7 Seq # mismatch
7 Seq # mismatch
8 Neighbor flapping
OSPF Features
OSPF is a well developed routing protocol. It is suitable for most
of networks, especially enterprise network.
It has features such as:
8)OSPF is suitable for any size network ,and in can support thousands
routers at most.
10. How to get the external routes without making area Not So Stubby?
13. A major network is advertised as summary in one area and few of the routes from that
network is configured in another area. What will happen in that case?
14. If any of the OSPF area is not stabilized, does it impact another area?
15. What is the use of forwarding address in LSA 5 and LSA 7?
16. External routes are available in OSPF database but not installing in routing table?
17. If loopback is not configured, what will be the router-id selected by OSPF process?
18. Can we run multiple OSPF process in single router and what is the advantage of using it?
25. After configuring new router-id, automatically it will be used or do we need to use some type
of command to get it operational.
26. Why the secondary ip address of interface is not advertising in IGP cloud?
27. OSPF neighbourship is not coming up. Please tell the various steps to troubleshoot it.
28. One side MTU is 1500 and another side MTU is 1600. Does it affect neighbourship?
Router B that is receiving hello packet does not find itself listed in the neighbor
list of the hello pkt sent by Router A. This could be due to problems in sending
hellos from this router B.
By having ASBR in regular area where the external LSA's will be received as
LSA Type 5
Localizing LSA's to regular area and send summaries of LSA into backbone to
reduce RT size & restricting LSU, LSR query range.
After the merger... you get a link connected from C1 to the new company...
and you start running a new OSPF process say OSPF 200 and add only the
new link inside this process... When you do that the routes that you get in
OSPF 100 is your existing company routes and the routes in OSPF 200 will
the routes from the new company... So now you have two different routing
tables...
224.0.0.5 Hello pkt & 224.0.0.6 used by DROTHER to notify DR,BDR upon
TCN
Layer 3
Higest OSPF priority. If same OSPF priority then RID is used for tiebreaker
New DR and BDR election process will resume.
Layer 2 is down
OSPF not enabled on the interface
Interface is defines as passive
Mismatched subnet mask
Mismatched hello/dead interval
Mismatched Authentication key
Mismatched area ID
Mismatched Transit/Stub area
1.Neighbor router is from diff vendor, adjust the mtu on the other vendor router.
2. Mismatch MTU.
3. Neighbor RID is same as ours.
4. Unicast is broken
a. wrong VC/DLCi mapping in frame/ATM environment in highly
redundant network
b. mtu problem, can’t ping across with more than certain length packet
c. access-list blocking unicast. After 2-way OSPF send unicast packet
except p2p links
d. NAT is translating unicast packet
5. Between PRI and BRI/dialer and network type is p2p
1. LS request is being made and neighbor is sending bad packet or mem
corrupt.
2. LS request is being made and neighbor is ignoring the request
3. MTU mismatch problem.
Distribute-list in is configured
OSPF is enabled on secondary but not on primary
Backbone area became discontigous
Check for LSA's having low LSAge, frequently changing seq nos.
Too many inter area or external routes --- same should be summarized
1.All LSA refresh every 30 min (bad!)
2.Timers of each LSA get sync (worse!)
3.With group pacing only LSAs that reach max-age get refreshed periodically
4.interval is configurable
1. LSA should one of 5 LSAs
2. If LSA is type 5 and the neighbor is associated with a stub area
3. If one of the options change
4. If the state of MS bit is inconsistent with master slave connection
5. If the I-bit is set
6. If the master receives a DBD packet after a dead interval
7. If the requested LSA is not found,then something has gone wrong with the database
exchange
If the media is Frame Relay look for broadcast queue drops
Must be a Layer 2 problem
Disadvantages of OSPF
1)complexity of configuration:because of the complexity of
network attribute and dividing areas when running OSPF,
the network administrators need to possess solid knowledge
of data communication and computer networks in order to
make OSPF working well, with OSPF getting more and more
popular, this is not considered a big problem.
1 Router
show ip ospf interface 2 Network
3 Summary
4 ASBR-Summary
5 External
debug ip ospf adj
eigrp log-neighbor-changes
1 Neighbor stability debug eigrp packet hello
2 Stuck-in-active routes
show process cpu
3 High CPU
Show ip eigrp events
Disadvantages of EIGRP
1)there is no area in EIGRP,so it is not good at dealing
with big hierarchy network. When running OSPF on a big
network, we can make the network hierarchy by dividing
the network into some areas. Obviously, EIGRP is not a
good choice for a big network. This is also a restriction
of distance-vector routing protocol (like RIP, RIPII).
If EIGRP be a routing protocol for a big network, we can
separate the network into different EIGRP domain, then
import routing table to each other, but it is not a optimal
network design, and very few network has been designed
like this.
28. I am having two routes for remote destination but only single route is installing in
routing table, what’s the reason for this?
29. How many links can be assigned for load balancing or sharing?
30. In eBGP I am establishing my neighbourship with loopback address but it’s not
coming up. Please specify different reasons for not coming up.
33. I am receiving updates from eBGP peer, will the next hop change or not?
34. I am receiving updates from iBGP peer, will the next hop change or not?
35. A router is receiving same route from two different eBGP peers. The AS path
information contains in peer 1 is {65500, 65550, 65555} and in peer 2 is {65501, 65501}.
But I want to make peer 1 preferred.
36. What is the difference between next-hop-self and update source loopback?
37. Define loop prevention mechanism in BGP.
38. What will happen if route reflector is not getting proper updates?
41. Can we use BGP as backdoor link for customers instead of OSPF? If yes, please let us know what could the issues BGP create?
42. What is BGP PIC?
To be checked by scenarios.
No export, no advertise, local as , internet
That router is not having routing path to the configured neighbor ip address
Configure highest weight, highest local preferrence for routes coming from peer 1.
By default, next hop ip address for received routes will be that of peer from whom routes are
received. With Next-hop-self router will instead send his own ip address as next hop when it
is advertising the route in IBGP or EBGP.update source loopback is used to force router to
send updates to its peering router with it's loopback ip address as source address.
Different path attributes are used while selecting path as valid path.
Cisco commands which can be used for checking the vpnv4 route is cited below
Show ip bgp vpnv4 all summary
Show ip bgp vpnv4 rd x:y neighbor routes
Show ip bgp vpnv4 rd x:y neighbor advertise routes
On both RRs you can check the installed routes.
Workaround:-
This is nothing but the cisco bug. In this case you need to check IOS. A part from this you
can clear the full bgp neighbourship or reload the router. After that it receives the full routes.
So if you see your traffic behaving abnormally then check your route reflectors updates first.
The reason for writing this post because I faced the same problem and it is not a test lab
scenario.
Introduction
Route reflectors are used for breaking full mesh iBGP rule. In this post I am evaluating how
to synchronize both the route reflectors especially in case of MPLSVPN network. In my
previous post I have described the problems can come if proper route updates are missing.
Most of the service providers are using peer-group in BGP. If you are using peer-group then
might face the cisco ios bug which is CSCsj09838. According to the bug
BGP sending incomplete updates when using update-groups
BGP fails to send complete update to peers who are part of an update group with more than
one member. Soft clear of peer in question will fix the issue.
I have seen the problem which is coming in 12.4.11T4 as well as with 12.4 15T1.
Introduction
Route reflectors are used for breaking full mesh iBGP rule. In this post I am evaluating how
to synchronize both the route reflectors especially in case of MPLSVPN network. In my
previous post I have described the problems can come if proper route updates are missing.
Most of the service providers are using peer-group in BGP. If you are using peer-group then
might face the cisco ios bug which is CSCsj09838. According to the bug
BGP sending incomplete updates when using update-groups
BGP fails to send complete update to peers who are part of an update group with more than
one member. Soft clear of peer in question will fix the issue.
I have seen the problem which is coming in 12.4.11T4 as well as with 12.4 15T1.
Introduction
Route reflectors are used for breaking full mesh iBGP rule. In this post I am evaluating how
to synchronize both the route reflectors especially in case of MPLSVPN network. In my
previous post I have described the problems can come if proper route updates are missing.
Most of the service providers are using peer-group in BGP. If you are using peer-group then
might face the cisco ios bug which is CSCsj09838. According to the bug
BGP sending incomplete updates when using update-groups
BGP fails to send complete update to peers who are part of an update group with more than
one member. Soft clear of peer in question will fix the issue.
I have seen the problem which is coming in 12.4.11T4 as well as with 12.4 15T1.
Introduction
Route reflectors are used for breaking full mesh iBGP rule. In this post I am evaluating how
to synchronize both the route reflectors especially in case of MPLSVPN network. In my
previous post I have described the problems can come if proper route updates are missing.
Most of the service providers are using peer-group in BGP. If you are using peer-group then
might face the cisco ios bug which is CSCsj09838. According to the bug
BGP sending incomplete updates when using update-groups
BGP fails to send complete update to peers who are part of an update group with more than
one member. Soft clear of peer in question will fix the issue.
I have seen the problem which is coming in 12.4.11T4 as well as with 12.4 15T1.
Introduction
Route reflectors are used for breaking full mesh iBGP rule. In this post I am evaluating how
to synchronize both the route reflectors especially in case of MPLSVPN network. In my
previous post I have described the problems can come if proper route updates are missing.
Most of the service providers are using peer-group in BGP. If you are using peer-group then
might face the cisco ios bug which is CSCsj09838. According to the bug
BGP sending incomplete updates when using update-groups
BGP fails to send complete update to peers who are part of an update group with more than
one member. Soft clear of peer in question will fix the issue.
I have seen the problem which is coming in 12.4.11T4 as well as with 12.4 15T1.
As we have already seen that(OSPF High Availability with SSO,NSF and NSR) there are
two different mechanism to prevent routing protocol re-convergence during a processor
switch-over. One is Graceful Restart(Non Stop Forwarding) and another is Non Stop
Routing(NSR). Graceful Restart and Non Stop Routing allows for the forwarding of data
packets to continue along known routes. By using Graceful Restart routing protocol
information is being restored while using Non Stop Routing, routing protocol information is
being refreshed.
Most of the ISPs make extensive use of BGP communities while defining internal policies,
Inter-provider relationships and Customer traffic engineering. There is no such standard
defined for these communities but still RFC 1998 has community values which defined to
have particular meaning:-
• ASx:100 :- This community says set local preference to 100 and make this path as
preferred path.
• ASx:90:- This community says set local preference to 90 and make this path as backup if
dual homed to ASx.
• ASx:80:- This community says set local preference to 80. This link is to another ISP with
same AS path length.
• ASx:70:- This community says set local preference to 70. This link is to another ISP.
These communities are defined by the upstream ISP. All the customers which are homing
to ISP, they can attach these communities while advertising the routes.
For Example:-
If upstream ISP is AS 200; To declare a particular path as a backup path, their customer
would announce the prefix with community 100:70 to AS200. ISP with AS200 would receive
the prefix with the community 100:70 tag, and then set local preference to 70.
This results in improved scalability and simplifies the configuration. By using this feature,
you can use non MPLS network as transit network, this helps you to transport all the IPv4
routes with labels over non MPLS network.
When you issue the neighbor send-label command under BGP configuration, the routers
advertise to each other that they can then send MPLS labels with the routes. If the routers
successfully negotiate their ability to send MPLS labels, the routers add MPLS labels to all
outgoing BGP updates. This eliminates the need for using any label distribution protocol
between the LSRs.(IS LDP Required For VPNv4 Labels)
In the above scenario, route reflector can reflect the IPv4 routes and MPLS labels learned
from the ASBR to the PE routers in the VPN. This is accomplished by enabling the ASBR to
exchange IPv4 routes and MPLS labels with the route reflector. The route reflector also
reflects the VPNv4 routes to the PE routers in the VPN. ASBRs exchange IPv4 routes and
MPLS labels for the PE routers by using EBGP.
MPLS labels are included in the update messages. Routers exchange the following types of
BGP messages:
1. Open Messages
2. Update Messages
3. Keepalive Messages
4. Notification Messages
Out of four, Update Messages contains the Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI),
which has IP addresses of the usable routes. The update message also includes path
attributes and the lengths of both the usable and unusable paths. Labels for VPNv4 routes
are encoded in the update message as specified in RFC 2858. The labels for the IPv4
routes are encoded in the update message as specified in RFC 3107.
1. Difference between hub, bridge and switch?
2. What is mac address and why it is required?
3. In layer 2 domain do we need ip address for communication?
4. What is arp and why it is required?
18. How do non bridge s/w decide which port will elect as root port?
19. If a nonroot bridge has two redundant ports with the same root path cost, how does the
bridge choose which port will be the root port?
20. Port states of spanning tree protocol.
21. If the users face delay during initial login, what you will suggest to implement?
unicast traffic when dest mac add is in CAM table; unicast mac address
flooding when dest mac add is not in CAM table.
All f's
No, a cross-over cable is needed.
Each port of switch have individual collision domain i.e. can operate in full
duplex mode; multi-port router if L3 switch.
BPDU's are exchanged between switches running STP first to elect root
switch and then using root switch as reference to select forwarding and
blocked ports in redudant n/w topology
How far a switch is away from root switch is calculated by path cost which
is based on link Bandwidth.
All Switches initially will sent BID and RID with their mac address. When a
switch rx superior BPDU with lower RID then the switch will further sent
BPDU with received RID. This process repeats throughout the switched
n/w topology where all switches have identical RID, then that s/w is elected
as root bridge.
Non-root bridge decides on the lowest path cost to the root bridge or lowest
BID or lowest port ID whle electing root port
7. Two routers are having 4 equal cost links, how many ldp sessions will be established?
8. My LDP router id, OSPF router id and BGP router id is different, will it work to forward the traffic of
customers or not?
9. What is Penultimate Hop Popping and why it is required? Which router performs the PHP function?
19. What is the default range of MPLS labels in Cisco routers? How to extend that range?
21. What is the difference between VPNv4 and IPv4 address family?
29. In neighbor discovery command, I am receiving only xmit, what does it mean?
30. What is transport address?
31. What is the RFC of MPLS?
32. Why MPLS is called multi protocol?
33. What is the difference between MPLS, SSL and IPSec?
34. I am using different vendor products and want to implement TDP, what type of challenges will you
face?
35. Does MPLS support IPv6?
36. Can I use the existing IPv4 MPLS backbone for IPv6?
37. Define various troubleshooting commands in MPLS?
38. What is forward equivalence class aka FEC?
39. What is adjacency table?
40. Difference between MPLS IP and MPLS Label Protocol LDP command?
41. If MPLS get disable, will it harm my IGP or IPv4 traffic?
VRF-Lite
1. No propagation of routes in the core of service provider.
2. In legacy GRE customer is responsible for the management but in case of MPLS SP is responsible.
3. Customers can use the same ip address which is not possible in case of GRE.
4. MPLS saves cost as compared to ATM or frame relay network.
5. MPLS increase the response time.
6. Customers can have the QOS according to their requirements.
7. Fast reroute features by using traffic engineering.
8. MVPN support which saves lot of bandwidth.
VPN is generally Virtual Private Network which could be configured by using GRE tunnels. In that if you want a full mesh than
administrator need to setup n*n-1 tunnels. But in case of MPLS VPN, by default CPE works in full mesh form because of route
target.
MPLS is multi protocol label switching mechanism which uses the label to forward the traffic to the next hop address. It is
popular because it must be used for CPN (Converge Packet Network).
To make your PE router as P, you need to remove the BGP configurations and after that it will not participate with customer
network.
One session
LDP router id and BGP router-id should be same if SP is using labels only for loopbacks. If labels are generated for each and
every route then no problem at all.
Second last router performs the Penultimate Hop Popping function to remove the top most label.
See Aggregate Labels for this answer (IP Routing Lookup)
No
Yes
Downstream router is the one which is responsible to advertise the label first to upstream router in case of downstream on
demand method is selected.
By using acl
we always accept and forward ip packets to customers, for this we need to use ipv4 address-family. When the customers
packets are being received by PE they become labeled one and to forward labeled packets to different PE/RR; address-family
vpnv4 is required. In short we can say that ipv4 address-family is being used for customers and vpnv4 address-family is used
by SP core.
No, MP-iBGP is used because of the support of multi protocol which normal BGP doesn’t support
Label information Base & Label Forwarding Information based
CEF is mandatory in Cisco routers for MPLS.
I have been hearing about MPLS-TP since long but now the time has come to implement MPLS-TP to the access network. The
question arises why only in the access network not in the core? The reason for this is that most of the service providers has
already built up the MPLS core and not it's time to move towards the access network with MPLS capabilities. But what does
fascinate service providers to adopt MPLS-TP? Legacy SDH network is used to built as transport network. Being costly
solution, all the service providers are looking an alternate solution; must be same as of SDH but have the capacity of Ethernet.
MPLS-TP (Transport Profile) is set of protocols which doesn't use any control plane and is defined under IETF. But G-MPLS
could be used for the dynamic allocation of labels. MPLS-TP doesn't offer Penultimate Hop Popping and ECMP.
But what does fascinate service providers to adopt MPLS-TP? Legacy SDH network is used to built as transport network. Being
costly solution, all the service providers are looking an alternate solution; must be same as of SDH but have the capacity of
Ethernet.
MPLS-TP (Transport Profile) is set of protocols which doesn't use any control plane and is defined under IETF. But G-MPLS
could be used for the dynamic allocation of labels. MPLS-TP doesn't offer Penultimate Hop Popping and ECMP.
Pseudowire emulation aka PWE3 that emulates the attributes of service over packet switched network (PSN). Pseudo means
no physical existence only virtual. By using pseudowire, service provider can emulate any circuit end to end. E.g. if customer is
looking for TDM bandwidth end to end, but SP is having a packet core network but no TDM backhaul, in that case pseudowire
help SP to deliver end to end circuit which uses packet core network and provide TDM drop to customers. This is the case
where in both termination points are having same output but in case of different output like one side Ethernet and another side
frame-relay or atm, the best is to provision inter network circuit.
Types of Pseudowire
1. CESoPSN:- Circuit Emulation over Packer Switched Network supports framed and channelized TDM services over packet
switched network.
2. SAToP:- Structure Agnostic TDM over Packet, is a TDM Pseudowire technology which treats the TDM traffic as data traffic
and ignore the framing bits. It supports unframed TDM services.
Advantages of SAToP:-
1. Flexible packet size.
2. Lowest end to end delay.
3. Low overhead.
Advantages of CESoPSN:-
1. Lower packetization delay
MPLS traffic engineering backbone travels on a single LSP that connects the ingress point to the egress point.
A label represents a forwarding equivalence class, but it does not represent a particular path through the network. In general,
the path through the network continues to be chosen by the existing Layer 3 routing algorithms such as OSPF, Enhanced
IGRP, and BGP. That is, at each hop when a label is looked up, the next hop chosen is determined by the dynamic routing
algorithm.
LSP uses is determined by the LSP resource requirements and network resources, such as bandwidth.
Available resources are flooded by means of extensions to a link-state-based Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP).
Traffic engineering tunnels are calculated at the LSP head based on a fit between required and available resources (constraint-
based routing). The IGP automatically routes the traffic onto these LSPs. Typically, a packet crossing the MPLS traffic
engineering backbone travels on a single LSP that connects the ingress point to the egress point.
•IP tunnel interfaces—From a Layer 2 standpoint, an MPLS tunnel interface represents the head of an LSP. It is configured with
a set of resource requirements, such as bandwidth and media requirements, and priority.
From a Layer 3 standpoint, an LSP tunnel interface is the head-end of a unidirectional virtual link to the tunnel destination.
•MPLS traffic engineering path calculation module—This calculation module operates at the LSP head. The module determines
a path to use for an LSP. The path calculation uses a link-state database containing flooded topology and resource information.
•RSVP with traffic engineering extensions—RSVP operates at each LSP hop and is used to signal and maintain LSPs based on
the calculated path.
•MPLS traffic engineering link management module—This module operates at each LSP hop, does link call admission on the
RSVP signalling messages, and does bookkeeping of topology and resource information to be flooded.
•Link-state IGP (Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (IS-IS) or OSPF—each with traffic engineering extensions)—
These IGPs are used to globally flood topology and resource information from the link management module.
•Enhancements to the SPF calculation used by the link-state IGP (IS-IS or OSPF)—The IGP automatically routes traffic onto
the appropriate LSP tunnel based on tunnel destination. Static routes can also be used to direct traffic onto LSP tunnels.
•Label switching forwarding—This forwarding mechanism provides routers with a Layer 2-like ability to direct traffic across
multiple hops of the LSP established by RSVP signalling.
One approach to engineering a backbone is to define a mesh of tunnels from every ingress device to every egress device. The
MPLS traffic engineering path calculation and signalling modules determine the path taken by the LSPs for these tunnels,
subject to resource availability and the dynamic state of the network. The IGP, operating at an ingress device, determines which
traffic should go to which egress device, and steers that traffic into the tunnel from ingress to egress.
A flow from an ingress device to an egress device might be so large that it cannot fit over a single link, so it cannot be carried by
a single tunnel. In this case, multiple tunnels between a given ingress and egress can be configured, and the flow is load-
shared among them.
VRF-lite feature, the multiple VPN routing/forwarding instances in customer edge devices. (VRF-lite is also termed multi-VRF CE, or multi-VR
multi-VRF CE, or multi-VRF Customer Edge Device). VRF-lite allows a service provider to support two or more VPNs with overlapping IP addresses using o
pping IP addresses using one interface.
What is a firewall?
Describe, genrally, how to manage a firewall
What is a Denial of Service attack?
What is a “spoofed” packet?
What is a SYN Flood?
What do you do if you are a victim of a DoS?
What is GPG/PGP?
What is SSH?
What is SSL? How do you create certificates?
What would you do if you discovered a UNIX or Network device on your
network has been compromised?
What would you do if you discovered a Windows system on your network has
been comrpromised?
What is DNS Hijacking?
What is a log host?
What is IDS or IDP, and can you give me an example of one?
Why are proxy servers useful?
What is web-caching?
1. What is QOS and why it is required?
2. What is layer2 qos and layer3 qos?
3. What is tail drop?
4. Describe methods of QOS?
5. What is hardware QOS and Software QOS?
6. Difference between a policer and a shaper?
7. What is token bucket algorithm?
8. Where to define the markings?
9. Does QOS increase the load of the equipment?
10. What is TOS and IP DSCP?
11. what are the different classes available?
12. How to calculate the decimal value of classess?
13. What is the difference between priority and bandwidth command?
14. What is low latecy queueing?
15. what is class based weighted fair queuing?
16. What is first in first out queue (FIFO)?
17. What is fair queue?
18. If I give teh ip precendence five to data traffic, what will happen?
1. Why multicast is required in MPLS SP cloud?
2. Does MPLS understand multicast?
3. What is Assert message in multicast and when these are required?
4. What is the difference between dense mode, sparse mode and sparse dense mode?
5. Can we use dense mode by using sparse mode? If yes, then what is the use of sparse dense mode?
6. What is the difference between (*,G) and (S,G) entry?
7. In sparse dense mode if we don’t use RP what will be the effect?
8. In SSM( Source Specific Multicast) how to advertise RP?
9. Which type of entries created in Auto RP, BSR, MSDP and SSM mode?
10. What is the difference between ip igmp join group and ip igmp static join group?
11. SSM requires IGMPv3 but in MPLS SP cloud why we don’t use IGMPv3?
12. What is the advantage of using SSM in MPLS SP cloud?
13. How to maintain S,G entry for a long time?
14. How to select Multicast Group? Is there any type of overlapping happens, if yes then what’s its advantage and disadvantage?
15. In MPLS cloud, if we define two loopbacks in multicast for creating hierarchical cloud, what will happen?
16. I am receiving RPF failure message at PE end and don’t have access of CE router, how to solve the problem without having CE access?
17. Difference between Shortest path tree and shared path tree?
18. Difference between data and default mdt?
19. Does default mdt works without data mdt and vice versa?
20. Can MPLS SP cloud have SSM and MSDP at same time? If yes, then what’s the reason for specifying two protocols?
21. What is difference between address-family ipv4, vpnv4 and mdt?
22. If SP cloud doesn’t use address-family mdt what will happen?
23. If you ask to design a MPLS based multicast network, what will you suggest?
24. What is MDT tunnel?
25. Can we modify MDT tunnel?
26. What is the multicast source address and group address in MPLS SP cloud?