cui2011
cui2011
di2 E 1− e τ U 1 − e− β l U
L + Ri2 = E − U (3) I10 = −( ) = ( n − ) (13)
dt R −
T
R 1 − e−l R
1− e τ
Solving the equation, we have:
t T
t −ton t −ton − on −
−
τ E −U −
τ E e τ −e τ U e −α l − e −l U
i2 = I 20 e + (1 − e ) (4) I 20 = −( ) = (n − ) (14)
R R −
T
R 1 − e−l R
1− e τ
Using the original condition I10 = 0 (see Fig.4) and
i1 = I 20 at t = ton , we can obtain the current i2 as: Set β = 1 − α and linearize the above two formulas using
αT t Taylor series [4]:
E −U U τ E −
i2 = + ( e − )e τ (5) U
R R R I10 = I 20 = (n − β ) (15)
In the above formula, i2 = 0 at t = t2 , hence, R
ton The above formula represents the average armature current
e τ −n I 0 when inductance L is infinite [4], hence
t2 = τ ln( ) (6) U E − (1 − α )U
1− n I 0 = (n − β ) = (16)
t R R
− on
1 − ne τ The average regenerative current on the DC bus is
t x = τ ln (7)
1− n E − (1 − α )U
I ave = (1 − α ) I 0 = (1 − α )[ ] (17)
When t x < toff , the circuit is working under the armature R
discrete current state. Using the condition as t x < toff , we I ave is a quadratic parabola function with down opening,
obtain the following formula as: so it has a maximum I max . Using dI ave dα = 0 , we can
L U (8) obtain this maximum I max and corresponding PWM duty
α < 1− ln R
α0
RT − T
U − E (1 − e L ) cycle α max as:
Formula (8) shows that when PWM duty cycle is very E
α max = 1 − (18)
small, i.e. α < α 0 , the armature current is discrete, and when 2U
PWM duty cycle is very large, i.e. α ≥ α 0 , the armature E2
I max = (19)
current is continuous. Therefore, the working state of circuit 4UR
depends on α , thereby the deduction of mathematical To sum up, when brushless PM motor is working under
expression of the relationship between average regenerative half-bridge-modulation regenerative braking state, then if the
current on the DC bus and PWM duty cycle is also based on armature current is discrete, i.e., α < α 0 , the average
α. regenerative current on the DC bus I ave is a monotonically
increasing function, and if the armature current is continuous, the DC motor for electric operation and the brushless PM
i.e., α ≥ α 0 , I ave is a quadratic parabola function with a motor for generation operation. Under the condition, the
maximum. Therefore, one optimal duty cycle which makes oscillogram of phase current and the charging current when
average regenerative current maximum exists, and formulas the brushless PM motor is braking is illustrated in Fig.7(b)
(18) and (19) show that the optimal duty cycle decreases and and Fig.8(b) respectively.
the maximum average regenerative current increases as the Comparing with Fig.8(a) and Fig.8(b), one can know that
back EMF increases, i.e., the speed of the motor increases. the charging current is above the zero baseline, even the rise
of continuous stage current and the fall of charging stage
D. Simulation and Experiment current are clearly showed every PWM cycle. Besides,
Tab.3 Fig.7(b) is nearly the same with Fig.7(a). Therefore, the
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP PARAMETERS theoretical deduction and simulation results are proved to be
Parameter Symbol Value correct.
Stator resistance( Ω ) R1 0.38
E. Data Processing and Analysis
Stator inductance( mH ) L1 0.3 To study the relationship between average regenerative
Ratio of back EMF and speed( V / r ⋅ min −1 ) E1 / n1 0.045 current on the DC bus and PWM duty cycle under different
Number of pole pairs p 19
speeds, as shown in Fig.9(a) and Fig.9(b), four kinds of speed
are selected both in simulation and experiment: 50r/min,
Rated voltage( V ) UN 24
100r/min, 150r/min and 200r/min.
Rated speed( r / min ) nN 200
(a) (b)
Fig.9. Average regenerative current Vs PWM duty cycle under four speeds.
(a) Simulation. (b) Experiment.
Fig.7. Waveform of phase current. (a) Simulation. (b) Experiment.
As shown in Fig.9(a) and Fig.9(b), when the brushless PM
motor is working under the half-bridge-modulation
regenerative braking state, one optimal duty cycle which
makes average regenerative current maximum exists.
Furthermore, the higher the speed is, the greater average
regenerative current is; as the speed increases, the optimal
duty cycle which makes average regenerative current
maximum decreases. Therefore, the deduction of the
relationship between average regenerative current on the DC
bus and PWM duty cycle is proved to be consistent with the
Fig.8. Waveform of charging current. (a) Simulation. (b) Experiment. experiment.
To verify the correctness of the theoretical deduction, a III. OPTIMAL BRAKING CONTROL SCHEME BASED ON
simulation mode1 of regenerative braking system was MAXIMAL HARVEST DUTY-CYCLE MODEL
established based on Matlab/simulink [2]. The parameters of
In the actual application, there are four constraints to the
brushless PM motor used in the simulation are given in Tab.3.
optimization of regenerative braking control scheme in
The simulation waveform of phase current and charging
electric motorcycle presented in this paper. 1) The optimal
current of battery when the motor is braking are illustrated in
PWM duty cycle is selected to obtain the maximum average
Fig.7(a) and Fig.8(a) respectively.
regenerative current according to the brake initial speed, 2)
The experimental system of regenerative braking for The average regenerative current can not exceed the
electric motorcycle consists of a 24V storage battery, a maximum allowable charge limited current of valve-regulated
three-phase MOSFET inverter, a brushless PM motor, a DC lead-acid (VRLA) [16], 3) The braking torque should be
motor and control circuits. The parameters of brushless PM suitably controlled considering the riding feeling and safeness
motor used in the experiment are the same as that used in the especially on downhill roads, 4) Mechanical braking is
simulation. In the experiment, a brushless PM motor and a essential in emergency.
DC motor compose a reversible drive system to simulate This paper defines three braking modes “downhill roads
half-bridge-modulation regenerative braking condition, i.e., mode”, “flat roads mode” and “emergency mode”. The
“downhill roads mode” is switched by turning on an on-off signal of dynamic PWM duty cycle is obtained from
switch when the electric motorcycle goes into downhill roads equations (21) in which α b1 and α b 2 is the tolerance of
[17], and the handlebar is designed bi-directional in order to duty cycle for two cases respectively and this paper sets
drive forward in clockwise direction and regenerative brake lower limit motor speed nmin = (1 − δ )n0 and upper limit
in anticlockwise direction. In additional, the mechanical
motor speed nmax = (1 + δ )n0 considering the riding feeling
handbrake is equipped with a pressure sensor to check
whether the electric motorcycle is going to work in and safeness as the maximum tolerance rate of downhill
“emergency mode”. speed δ , i.e. D Downhill (n1 ) .
α [ k + 1] = α [ k ] + α b1 , ifα [k ] < α n[ k ] & nmin < n[k ] < nmax
A. Maximal Harvest Duty-cycle Model
As the voltage of battery is basically changeless in the α [ k + 1] = α [ k ] − α b1 , ifα [ k ] > α n[ k ] & nmin < n[k ] < nmax (21)
experiment, so when the average regenerative current reaches α [ k + 1] = α [ k ] + α b 2 , ifn[k ] ≥ nmax
a maximum, the regenerative feedback power reaches a α [ k + 1] = α [ k ] − α , ifn[ k ] ≤ n
b2 min
maximum too. Therefore, Maximal Harvest Duty-cycle At the beginning of downhill roads, the rider turns on the
Model [18] is tentatively established to realize the simple but switch to work the motorcycle in downhill roads mode at n0 ,
effective regenerative braking control scheme considering the and the optimal duty cycle α n0 making average
actual application. It focuses on the dual goals of the safe regenerative current maximum is selected by way of a certain
braking process and the maximal power harvest [5]. transition from 0 to α n 0 to keep the process smooth. When
According to the three braking modes, the Maximal the transition comes to the end, the motor reaches a new
Harvest Duty-cycle Model is established as follows, where speed n[1] , and then the equations (21) come into effect.
n1 is the motor speed, and the symbol Ω represents the From this model, the PWM duty cycle α of next control
Brake Depth varied with the handlebar turned in period is always selected to approach the one which makes
anticlockwise direction. average regenerative current maximum according to the
D Downhill (n1 ) , Downhill Roads Mode speed of current control period.
(20)
D Flat (Ω ) , Flat Roads Mode 2 Flat Roads Mode & Emergency Mode
0 , Emergency Mode The two modes are different from the downhill roads mode
The output value of Maximal Harvest Duty-cycle Model is for no gravitational potential energy. When the electric
the PWM duty cycle α . motorcycle works in “flat roads mode”, the rider brakes the
electric motorcycle by turning the handlebar in anticlockwise
1 Downhill Roads Mode direction, i.e. Brake Depth Ω , and the PWM duty cycle
It aims at the smooth and reliable speed limit on downhill would be varied linearly to realize the regenerative braking.
roads [9], beside the goal of the maximal power harvest. Assume k is the positive slop of D Flat (Ω ) , thus, the model
Therefore, the speed fluctuation range and the dynamic duty of “flat roads mode” is established as follows:
cycles to harvest the maximal power are concerned in the D Flat ( Ω ) = k ⋅ Ω (22)
model D Downhill (n1 ) . While in “emergency mode”, the rider must press the
handbrake to stop the electric motorcycle immediately in
emergency. In this case, the negative-accelerate may be so
large that the too large braking torque at high speed might
result in a danger of turn over and the surge recovery current
would injure the VRLA. Therefore, the output value of
Maximal Harvest Duty-cycle Model in “emergency mode”
equals ZERO, and the electric motorcycle is stopped by
mechanical braking only.
(a) (b) B. Regenerative Braking Control Scheme
Fig.10. (a)Speed Vs PWM duty cycle making the current maximum under Fig.11 shows the configuration of the proposed
the constraints. (b) Prototype of electric motorcycle regenerative braking scheme based on Maximal Harvest
Eliminate the data points dissatisfied CONSTRAINT 2 in Duty-cycle Model.
Fig.9, and then the trajectory of n1 - α shows the ∆ n[ k + 1]
n*[k +1]
relationship between the downhill speed and the PWM duty α [k + 1] Tb
cycle making average regenerative current maximum as n[k ]
Tmg sin θ
Fig.10(a). This paper hopes that when the downhill speed is α [k ]
α
n[k ]
n[k ]
varied, the PWM duty cycle of next control period is also n