Assignment

On
The Impact of IFRS 17 on Insurance Financial Statements
Course name: Accounting for Specialized Institution
Course Code: AIS 3206

Submitted by Submitted to
Md. Shahadat Hosen Fahimul Kader Siddique
ID No: 12008013 Assistant Professor
Regi: 000014276 Dept. Accounting & Information
Systems
Status: Third Year, Second
Semester Begum Rokeya University Rangpur.
Dept. Accounting & Information
Systems
Begum Rokeya University
Rangpur.

1
 Transition from IFRS 4 to IFRS 17: Implications for Insurance
Contracts

The transition from IFRS 4 to IFRS 17 marks a fundamental shift in how insurance
contracts are reported, bringing greater consistency, transparency, and comparability to the
financial statements of insurers globally. While IFRS 4, an interim standard, allowed
insurers to use a mix of local accounting practices, IFRS 17 introduces a unified approach
to the accounting treatment of insurance contracts, with a focus on reflecting the economics
of these contracts more accurately.

Insurance Contract Reporting Under IFRS 17

Under IFRS 4, insurers had significant flexibility in how they recognized and measured
insurance contracts, often resulting in inconsistencies across jurisdictions. IFRS 17 requires
a more standardized approach, mandating that insurers measure the liability for each
insurance contract based on fulfillment cash flows. This includes the present value of
future cash flows (i.e., premiums, claims, and expenses), adjusted for the time value of
money and risk. The key innovation under IFRS 17 is the introduction of a contractual
service margin (CSM), which represents the unearned profit of the insurance contract and
is recognized over the life of the contract as services are provided. This approach ensures
that profit is recognized in line with the provision of insurance coverage, rather than on a
timing basis, as was often the case under IFRS 4.

Impact on Assets and Liabilities

IFRS 17 changes how both assets and liabilities are recognized. Insurance contract
liabilities now reflect more comprehensive, forward-looking estimates of future cash flows,
including claims, premiums, and administrative costs, adjusted for risk and discount rates.
This can result in more volatile liabilities as they are remeasured at each reporting date
based on updated assumptions and experience. The insurance contract asset or liability
will reflect these updated estimates, which could impact an insurer’s balance sheet
significantly.

Impact on Profits

The recognition of profits under IFRS 17 is more directly tied to the delivery of insurance
coverage rather than being smoothed over the term of the contract, as under IFRS 4. Profits
will be recognized over time, depending on the release of the CSM, with any changes in
estimates of future cash flows recognized immediately in profit or loss. This results in
greater volatility in reported profits, as they are more sensitive to assumptions and the
timing of claims and premiums.

In summary, the transition to IFRS 17 introduces a more standardized and transparent way
of accounting for insurance contracts. It impacts insurers’ balance sheets and income

2
statements by increasing the complexity and volatility of liability recognition, profit
measurement, and overall financial performance.

Comparison of Financial Statements Under IFRS 4 vs. IFRS 17

The transition from IFRS 4 to IFRS 17 introduces notable differences in how an insurance
company’s financial statements are presented, affecting both the balance sheet and income
statement. The key changes arise from IFRS 17’s more structured and standardized
approach to measuring insurance contracts, compared to the flexibility allowed under IFRS
4.

1. Balance Sheet:

• Under IFRS 4: Insurance liabilities could be measured using a range of methods,

depending on the insurer’s jurisdiction or the specific accounting policy. For
example, insurers could use the "premium allocation method" or "incurred loss
method," leading to significant variation in how liabilities were recognized across
companies and regions. Insurance contract liabilities were often recognized on a
more simplified basis, with reserves based on historical data and adjusted for future
claims.
• Under IFRS 17: Liabilities are more precisely measured based on fulfillment cash
flows, which include the present value of future cash inflows (premiums) and
outflows (claims, administrative costs), adjusted for time value of money and risk.
A crucial addition under IFRS 17 is the contractual service margin (CSM), which
represents the unearned profit on the contract, and is gradually recognized as the
insurer provides coverage. This changes how liabilities are reported, with greater
volatility and more detailed remeasurement each reporting period. The balance
sheet will reflect a more dynamic and forward-looking approach to insurance
liabilities, with the CSM increasing or decreasing based on changes in assumptions
or experience.

2. Income Statement:

• Under IFRS 4: Profit recognition was more flexible, often spread over the life of
the contract using methods like the "premium allocation method." This could
smooth earnings over time, with less volatility in profit reporting, as insurers could
recognize income on a basis that might not directly reflect the provision of
insurance coverage.
• Under IFRS 17: Profit is recognized as the insurance service is provided, with the
release of the CSM over time. This means that insurers will recognize profits more
gradually, but the recognition is linked to the actual provision of services.
Additionally, any changes in estimates of future cash flows (e.g., updated
assumptions on claims or premiums) must be recognized immediately in profit or
loss. As a result, the income statement will likely show more volatility, with
fluctuations in profit depending on how assumptions change during the contract’s
life

3
3. Overall Financial Impact:

• Under IFRS 4: Financial statements could appear more stable, as insurers had
more flexibility in how they recognized revenues and liabilities. Profit smoothing
was common, and earnings might be less sensitive to changes in assumptions.
• Under IFRS 17: Financial statements will be more transparent and reflective of
the economic realities of the insurance contract. The balance sheet and income
statement will likely exhibit more volatility due to remeasurement of liabilities, the
immediate recognition of changes in estimates, and the systematic release of the
CSM.

In summary, the shift to IFRS 17 makes insurance company financial statements more
consistent and reflective of the true economics of insurance contracts, though it introduces
greater complexity and potential volatility compared to IFRS 4.

Challenges in the Transition from IFRS 4 to IFRS 17 and Adapting

Accounting Systems

The transition from IFRS 4 to IFRS 17 presents a range of challenges for insurance
companies, as the new standard significantly alters how insurance contracts are measured
and reported. To comply with IFRS 17, insurers must adapt their accounting systems, data
management practices, and operational processes to meet the new requirements.

1. Measurement and Reporting Complexity: One of the primary challenges is the

fundamental shift in how insurance liabilities are calculated under IFRS 17. The new
standard mandates that insurance liabilities be measured using fulfillment cash flows,
which includes the present value of future cash flows (premiums, claims, and expenses),
adjusted for time value of money and risk. This is more granular and complex than the
methods allowed under IFRS 4. Additionally, the introduction of the contractual service
margin (CSM), which represents unearned profit, requires insurers to track and amortize
this margin over the life of each contract, leading to greater complexity in financial
reporting.

2. Data Management and Systems Adaptation: To comply with IFRS 17, insurers must
enhance their data management capabilities. The new standard requires detailed data for
each individual contract, including information on future cash flows, risk adjustments, and
updated assumptions over time. Insurers will need to capture and store vast amounts of
granular data, which may not have been required under IFRS 4. This necessitates
significant upgrades to actuarial models, data storage, and IT infrastructure to handle the
complexity of remeasuring liabilities and tracking the CSM at each reporting period.

4
3. Integration of Actuarial and Financial Systems: Under IFRS 17, actuarial and
financial systems must be more closely integrated. The calculations of future cash flows,
discount rates, and risk adjustments must be seamlessly transferred into financial reporting
systems to ensure accurate and timely recognition of profits and liabilities. This requires
close collaboration between actuarial, finance, and IT departments to design systems that
can automate these complex processes.

4. Staff Training and Process Overhaul: The transition also requires comprehensive staff
training and process changes. Actuaries, accountants, and IT professionals must be trained
in the new rules, including the methodology for calculating the CSM and the new
disclosures required under IFRS 17. Companies must invest in upskilling their teams and
refining internal processes to ensure smooth implementation.

Conclusion: In summary, the transition to IFRS 17 is a major undertaking for insurance

companies. Adapting accounting systems to handle the increased complexity of contract
measurements, integrating actuarial and financial data, and investing in staff training and
process optimization are essential for a successful transition. Early preparation and system
enhancements are crucial to ensure compliance and minimize disruptions in financial
reporting.

IFRS 17: Main Provisions and Implications

IFRS 17, effective from January 2023, overhauls the accounting for insurance contracts,
replacing the interim IFRS 4. The new standard aims to improve the transparency,
consistency, and comparability of financial statements across the global insurance industry.
By providing a more uniform approach to accounting for insurance contracts, IFRS 17
ensures that insurers’ financial statements better reflect the economics of insurance
transactions.

Main Provisions of IFRS 17:

1. Measurement of Insurance Liabilities

IFRS 17 requires insurance contract liabilities to be measured using a fulfillment

cash flows approach. This means insurers must calculate the present value of future
cash inflows (premiums) and outflows (claims, expenses), adjusted for risk and
time value of money. This methodology provides a more precise and forward-
looking measure of an insurer’s obligations, replacing the more flexible,
jurisdiction-specific practices allowed under IFRS 4.

5
 2. Contractual Service Margin (CSM)

A key provision of IFRS 17 is the Contractual Service Margin (CSM), which

represents the unearned profit from an insurance contract. The CSM is recognized
over the duration of the contract as the insurer delivers insurance coverage. This
ensures that profit is recognized progressively, in line with the delivery of services,
rather than being spread evenly or recognized upfront as under IFRS 4.

3. Profit and Loss Recognition

IFRS 17 introduces more immediate recognition of changes in estimates. If future cash

flows or assumptions (such as expected claims or premiums) change, the impact is
immediately reflected in profit or loss. This contrasts with IFRS 4, which allowed more
smoothing of profits, leading to greater volatility under IFRS 17.

4. Enhanced Disclosure Requirements

IFRS 17 imposes more detailed disclosure obligations, including information on

the CSM, risk adjustments, and changes in estimates, providing greater insight into
the insurer's financial position and performance.

Implications of IFRS 17

The transition to IFRS 17 presents several challenges for insurers. The detailed
measurement of liabilities, especially the calculation and tracking of the CSM, demands
significant upgrades to actuarial models, accounting systems, and data management
processes. Insurers must also adapt to increased volatility in earnings, as changes in
assumptions and estimates are reflected immediately in profit or loss.

Moreover, the implementation of IFRS 17 requires substantial investment in technology

and staff training. Insurers need to enhance their IT infrastructure to handle the complexity
of real-time remeasurement and the granularity of data required by the new standard.

Overall, while IFRS 17 improves the comparability and transparency of financial reporting,
insurers face operational challenges in adapting to the new rules. Early preparation and
strategic investment in systems, data, and staff training will be critical for a smooth
transition.

6
 Presentation: Key Changes and Challenges in IFRS 17

1. Key Changes Under IFRS 17:

• Measurement of Insurance Liabilities

IFRS 17 introduces a new approach for measuring insurance contract liabilities

based on fulfillment cash flows. This requires insurers to estimate the present value
of future cash inflows (premiums) and outflows (claims, expenses), adjusted for
risk and time value of money. This is a more detailed and forward-looking measure
than the flexible methods allowed under IFRS 4.

• Contractual Service Margin (CSM)

A significant innovation in IFRS 17 is the introduction of the Contractual Service

Margin (CSM), which represents the unearned profit of an insurance contract. The
CSM is recognized over the life of the contract as the insurer provides coverage.
This ensures that profit recognition aligns more closely with the provision of
services, as opposed to the more arbitrary profit recognition methods under IFRS
4.

• Profit Recognition and Volatility

IFRS 17 introduces a more dynamic profit recognition approach. Profits are now
recognized gradually over the contract’s life, based on the release of the CSM.
However, any changes in estimates (such as future claims or premiums) are
immediately reflected in the profit or loss statement. This leads to greater volatility
in reported earnings compared to the smoother profit recognition allowed under
IFRS 4.

• Enhanced Disclosure Requirements

IFRS 17 mandates more detailed disclosures, including the CSM, risk adjustments,
and changes in assumptions, to provide clearer insights into the insurer's financial
position and performance.

7
2. Key Challenges in Transition:

• Increased Complexity

The transition to IFRS 17 requires insurers to measure liabilities more precisely,

incorporating fulfillment cash flows and managing the CSM. This complexity
demands significant updates to actuarial models and financial systems.

• System Overhaul and Data Management

Insurers must enhance their IT systems to handle detailed contract-level data,

manage real-time remeasurement of liabilities, and track the CSM over the life of
each contract.

• Training and Operational Changes

The implementation of IFRS 17 requires substantial training across actuarial,

finance, and IT teams to ensure compliance. New processes must be established to
ensure accurate data collection, measurement, and reporting.

Conclusion

While IFRS 17 enhances comparability and transparency in insurance accounting, it

presents significant challenges in terms of system complexity, data management, and
operational changes. Early preparation and investment in systems and staff training will be
crucial for a smooth transition to the new standard.