GeneralProvisions (1)
GeneralProvisions (1)
My Notes
Engineers
REINFORCED CONCRETE
General
Reinforcing schemes are generally designed to resist tensile stresses in particular regions of the concrete that might cause
unacceptable cracking and/or structural failure. Modern reinforced concrete can contain varied reinforcing materials made
of steel, polymers, or alternate composite material in conjunction with rebar or not. Reinforced concrete may also be
permanently stressed (concrete in compression, reinforcement in tension), to improve the behavior of the final structure
under working loads.
Compressive strength is initially checked by doing mix design to make sure the grade of concrete considered in the
structural design is achieved. Concrete cube testing or cylinder testing is done to check the development of the strength of
the concrete.
Compressive strength is the parameter that represents the concrete in the structural design.
Mainly, there are two materials such as concrete and steel in the mix. Therefore, knowing the
compressive strength is uttermost important for the designer.
The value of f’c shall be specified in construction documents and shall be in accordance below:
a. Limits in Table 1.1
b. Durability requirements in Table 1.3
c. Structural strength requirements.
The basic components of concrete are cement, water, and aggregates (sand and gravel). Cement and water form a paste
that fills the space between the aggregates and binds them together. Chapter 3 of the ACI Code and Section 426 of
Nationals Structural Code of the Philippines (2015) contains the minimum requirements for these components and other
materials that are commonly used in concrete.
Cement
Cement shall conform to one of the following specifications listed in Table 1.2.
All cementitious materials specified in above table and the combinations of these materials shall be included in
calculating the w/cm of the concrete mixture.
W0 n/a 17 None
W1 0.50 28 None
Maximum water-soluble chloride ion (Cl-)
content in concrete, percent by weight of Additional provisions
cement [7]
Non-prestressed Prestressed concrete
concrete
C0 n/a 17 1.00 0.06
C1 n/a 17 0.30 0.06 None
C2 0.40 35 0.15 0.06 Concrete cover [8]
[1]
The maximum w/cm limits in Table 1.2 do not apply to lightweight concrete.
[2]
For plain concrete, the maximum w/cm shall be 0.45 and the minimum f’c shall be 31 MPa.
[3]
Alternative combinations of cementitious materials to those listed in Table 1.2 are permitted when tested for sulfate resistance and meeting the
criteria in NSCP Section 426.4.2.2(c).
[4]
For seawater exposure, other type of Portland cements with tricalcium aluminate (C3A) contents up to 10 percent are permitted if the w/cm
does not exceed 0.40.
[5]
other available types of cement such as Type 1 or Type III are permitted on Exposure Classes S1 or S2 if the C3A contents are less than 8
percent for Exposure Class S1 or less than 5 percent for Exposure Class S2.
[6]
Improve sulphate resistance when used in concrete containing Type V cement. Alternatively, the amount of the specific source of the pozzolan
or slag cement to be used shall be at least the amount tested in accordance with ASTM C1012 and meeting the criteria in Section 426.4.2.2(c).
[7]
Water-soluble chloride ion content that is contributed from the ingredients including water, aggregates, cementitious materials, and admixtures
shall be determined on the concrete mixture by ASTM C1218M at age between 28 and 42 days.
[8]
Concrete cover shall be in accordance with NSCP Section 420.6
Aggregates
The nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate shall not be larger than:
In general, water that is drinkable can usually be used for making concrete. Non-potable water may also be suitable for
concrete. However, tests should be performed to determine if desired properties can be achieved.
The chemical balance of water is key for creation of a strong concrete mixture. As a result, drinking water is the only safe
option. All chemical components are regulated and the supply is monitored and tested.
Mixing water shall conform to ASTM C1602M. Water shall not contain deleterious amounts of chloride ion.
What happens when there is too much water in your concrete mix?
Once cured, concrete with too much water will also have a much greater risk of shrinkage and cracks,
especially in freeze/thaw climates, meaning that it will be particularly weak.
Water cement ratio (w/cm) is the ratio of the mass of water to the mass of cement added to concrete. The
water cement ratio formula directly affects the strength & durability of the concrete. The typical water-
cement ratio varies between 0.40 - 0.60 for different grades of concrete mix.
Admixture
Admixtures are ingredients other than cement, aggregates, and water that are added to concrete mix immediately before
or during mixing. Reducing the cost of concrete construction, economically achieving desired properties in concrete, and
maintaining the quality of concrete during mixing, transporting, placing, and curing.
1. Material properties like chemistry, fineness, particle size distribution, moisture content and temperature of
cementitious materials. Size, texture, combined grading, cleanliness, and moisture content of the aggregates,
2. Chemical admixtures dosage, type, combination, interaction, sequence of addition and its effectiveness,
3. Air content of concrete,
4. Concrete batching, mixing and transporting methods and equipment,
5. Temperature of the concrete,
6. Sampling of concrete, slump-testing technique, and the condition of test equipment,
7. The amount of free water in the concrete, and
8. Time since mixing of concrete at the time of testing.
Compaction Factor Test – the degree of compaction achieved by a standard amount of work is measured. The apparatus
is consists of two conical hoppers placed over one another over a cylinder. The upper hopper is filled with fresh
concrete which is then dropped into the second hopper and into the cylinder which is struck off flush. The
compacting factor is the ratio of the weight of concrete to the weight of an equal volume of fully compacted
concrete. The compacting factor for concrete of medium workability is about 0.9.
Other tests that are commonly employed to check the workability of concrete.
1. Flow test
2. Kelly ball test
3. Vee-Bee consistometer test.
4. K-Slump Test
Tensile Strength – is about a tenth of compressive strength. It is determined by loading a concrete cylinder across a
diameter.
Flexure Test – a plain concrete specimen is tested to failure in bending. The theoretical maximum tensile stress at the
bottom face at failure is calculated. This is called the modulus of rupture. It is about 1.5 times the tensile stress
determined by tensile strength.
Test Cores – cylindrical cores are cut from the finished structure with a rotary cutting tool. The core is soaked, capped
and tested in compression to give a measure of the concrete strength in the actual structure. The ratio of core height
to diameter and location where the core is taken affect the strength. The strength is lowest at the top surface in
increases with depth through the element. A ratio of core height-to-diameter of 2 gives a standard cylinder test.
Non-destructive test
Rebound Hardness Test – the Schimdt hammer test is used in the rebound hardness test in which a metal hammer held
against the concrete is struck by another spring-driven metal mass and rebounds. The amount of rebar is recorded on a
scale and this gives an indication of the concrete strength. The larger the rebound number, the higher the concrete
strength.
1. Every arithmetic average of any three consecutive strength test equals or exceeds f’c
2. No individual strength test (average of two cylinders) falls below f’c by more than 3.5 MPa, when f’c is 35 MPa or
less; or by more than 0.10f’c when f’c is more than 35 MPa.
Strength Test
The average strength of two cylinders made from the same sample of concrete and tested at 28 days or at
test age designated for determination of f’c.
The following table lists strength test data for 5 truckloads (batches) of concrete delivered to the job site. For each
batch, two cylinders were cast and tested at 28 days. The specified strength of the concrete is 27.6 MPa.
Determine the acceptability of the concrete based on the strength criteria of Sect 426.12.3 of NSCP C101-15,
Average of 3 Consecutive
Cylinder 1 Cylinder 2 Strength Test Tests
Test No. (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
1 28.4 29.4 28.9 -
2 26.5 28.2 27.4 -
3 30.5 30.7 30.6 29.0
4 25.3 26.4 25.8 27.9
5 31.9 31.5 31.7 29.4
The second acceptance criterion, based on the average of three (3) consecutive tests, is also satisfied
by the three consecutive strength test averages shown. The procedure to evaluate acceptance based
on 3 strength test results in a row is shown in the right column.
Third row = (28.9 + 27.4 + 30.6)/3 = 29.0 MPa
Fourth row = (27.4 + 30.6 + 25.8)/3 = 27.9 MPa
Fifth row = (30.6 + 25.8 + 31.7)/3 = 29.4 MPa
Thus, based on code acceptance criteria for concrete strength, the five strength tests results are
acceptable, both on the basis of the individual test results and the average of three consecutive test
results.
On a given project, if the total volume of concrete is such that frequency of testing would provide fewer than five strength
tests for a given concrete mixture, strength test specimens shall be made from at least five randomly selected batches or
from each batch if fewer than five batches are used.
If the total quantity of a given concrete mixture is less than 38 m 3, strength tests are not required if evidence of
satisfactory strength is submitted to and approved by the building official.
Concrete Mixture
Concrete mix shall be established so that concrete satisfies the following:
1. Can be placed readily into form and around reinforcement under anticipated placement without segregation or
excessive bleeding.
2. Meet requirements for assigned exposure class in accordance with either NSCP Sections 426.4.2.1(a) or
426.4.2.1(b)
3. Conform with strength test requirements for standard-cure specimens
Reinforcement
Reinforcement shall be deformed reinforcement, except that plain reinforcement shall be permitted for spirals or
prestressing steels.
Test on rebars is guided by Philippine National Standard (PNS) PNS – 49:2020 “Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement –
Specification” by the Bureau of Product Standard covering the following grades of steel rebars
It specifies the requirements for hot-rolled deformed steel bars in cut lengths and coils for concrete reinforcement. These
bars are rolled from billets of properly identified heats of mold-cast or strand-cast steel.
Marking
PNS 49 states that the Manufacturer’s identifying mark, bar size and grade shall be clearly embossed in each bar. The
system of marking shall be as given and as shown below.
Color codes painted on the surface of the ends of each bar may also be used.
Acceptance Requirements
NSCP Section 420.2.2.5b states that ASTM Grade 280 reinforcement is acceptable if it satisfies items (i) and (ii) below
and ASTM Grade 420 reinforcement if items (i) through (iii) are satisfied.
(i) Actual yield strength based on mill test does not exceed fy by more than 125 MPa
(ii) Ratio of the actual tensile strength to actual yield strength (TS/YS) is at least 1.25
(iii) Minimum elongation in 20 mm shall be at least 14 percent for bar sizes 10mmø through 20mmø, at least 12
percent for bar sizes 25mmø through 36mmø, and at least 10 percent for bar sizes 40mmø to 58mmø.
Concrete Cover
Concrete cover refers to the thickness of the concrete layer that surrounds and protects the reinforcing steel bars (rebar)
within a reinforced concrete structure. It acts as a barrier against external elements such as moisture, chemicals, and
environmental factors, safeguarding the rebar from corrosion and ensuring the structural integrity of the entire system.
Loads
Forces or other actions that result from the weight of all building materials, occupants and their possession, environmental
effects, differential movements, and restrained dimensional changes. Permanent loads are those loads in which variations
over time are rare or of small magnitude. All other loads are variable loads.
Dead Loads
Dead loads consist of the weight of all materials or construction incorporated into the building or other structure,
including but not limited to walls, floors, roofs, ceilings, stairways, built-in partitions, finishes, cladding and other
similarly incorporated architectural and structural items, and fixed service equipment, including the weight of the crane.
In the absence of definite information regarding dead loads, Table 1.7 is permitted by the code to be use as minimum
values. The code also states that floor in office buildings and other buildings where partition locations are subject to
change shall be designed to support, in addition to all other loads, a uniformly distributed dead load equal to 1.0 kPa
(Section 204.3).
Live Loads
Live loads refer to the transient or moving loads that structures experience due to human occupancy, furniture, vehicles,
and other temporary factors. Live loads vary in magnitude and location over time, as the intended use and occupancy of
the structure influences them.
Unit live loads as set forth in Table 1.8 shall be used to design floors. These loads shall be taken as minimum live loads of
horizontal projection to be used in the design of buildings for the occupancies listed. Where it can be determined in
designing floors that the actual live load will be greater than listed in the table, such live load shall be used in the design.
Where uniform floor loads are involved, consideration may be limited to full dead load on all spans in combination with
full live load on adjacent spans and alternate spans (called pattern loading for continuous beam and checkered loading
for slab).
Loads Combinations
Where strength reduction or load and resistance factor design is used, structures and all portion thereof shall resist the
most critical effects from the following combinations of factored loads:
1.4(D + F)
1.2(D + F + T) + 1.6(L + H) + 0.5(Lr or R)
1.2D + 1.6(Lr or R) + (f1L or 0.5W)
1.2D + 1.0W + f1L + 0.5(Lr or R)
1.2D + 1.0E + f1L
0.9D + 1.0W + 1.6H
0.9D + 1.0W + 1.6H
where
f1 = 1.0 for floors in places of public assembly, for live load in excess of 4.8 kPa, and for garage live load, or
= 0.5 for other live loads
D = dead load
E = earthquake load set forth in NSCP Section 208.6.1
Em = estimated maximum earthquake force that can be developed in the structure as set forth in NSCP Section
208.6.1
Earthquake Load
Structures shall be designed for ground motion producing structural response and seismic
forces in any horizontal direction. The following earthquake loads shall be used in the load
combinations set forth in NSCP Section 203.
𝐸 = 𝜌𝐸 + 𝐸
𝐸 =𝛺 𝐸
where
E the earthquake load on an element of the structure resulting from the
combination of the horizontal component, 𝑬𝒉 , and the vertical component, 𝑬𝒗
𝑬𝒉 the earthquake load due to the vase shear, V, or the design lateral force, Fp
𝑬𝒎 the estimated maximum earthquake force that can be developed in the
structure and used in the design of specific elements of the structure
𝑬𝒗 the load effect resulting from the vertical component and is equal to an
additional of 0.5CaID to the dead load effect, D, for Strength Design, and may
be taken as zero for Allowable Design.
𝜴𝒐 the seismic force amplification factor that is required for structural
overstrength
𝝆 Reliability/Redundancy Factor as given by the following equation
𝟔. 𝟏
𝝆=𝟐−
𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒙 𝑨𝑩
where
𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒙 the maximum element-storey shear ratio. For a given direction of
loading, the element-storey shear ratio of the design shear in the most
heavily loaded single element divided by the total storey shear.
Table 1.13 Strength Reduction Factors for Moments, Axial Force. Or Combined Moment and Axial Force
ø
Net tensile strain, 𝜺𝒕 Classification Type of Transverse Reinforcement
Spiral Others
𝜀 ≤ 𝜀 Compression controlled 0.75 0.65
The strength design method is based on the following two fundamental principles:
1. Static equilibrium. The compressive and tensile forces acting on any cross-section of a member are in equilibrium.
The above condition must be satisfied at every cross-section of a member. The basic equilibrium will be used in
determining nominal strengths of reinforced concrete members.
2. Compatibility of strain. The strain in a reinforcing bar that is embedded in concrete is equal to the strain in concrete
at that level.
The above condition implies that there is a perfect bond between the concrete and the reinforcing steel and that both
the materials act together to resist the effects from external load.
The design assumptions used in the strength design method are outlined in NSCP Section 422.2. The assumptions are
applicable in the design of members subject to flexure, axial or combination of both. The nominal strength of a reinforced
concrete member is determined based on these assumptions.
Design Assumption #1
Strain in reinforcement and concrete shall be assumed directly proportional to the distance from
the neutral axis.
The first design assumption is the traditional assumption made in beam theory: Plane sections that are perpendicular
to the axis of the bending prior to the bending remain plane after bending. This fundamentally implies that the
concrete and the reinforcing steel act together to resist load effects.
Though strictly speaking this assumption is incorrect for reinforced concrete members after cracking because the
strain on the tension side of the neutral axis varies significantly due to presence of cracks. However, experiments
shows that the distribution of strain is essentially linear across reinforced concrete cross-section even near ultimate
strength.
The strain distribution over the depth of a rectangular reinforced concrete section at ultimate strength is represented in
Fig. 1.4. For demonstrative purposes, it is assumed that the strains are compressive above the neutral axis and are
tensile below it. The strains in the concrete and reinforcement are directly proportional to the distance from the neutral
axis, which is located at a distance c from the compression face of the section. The ratio of ec to the strain of
reinforcement at different level can be obtained by similar triangles.
Design Assumption #2
Maximum usable strain at extreme concrete compression fiber shall be assumed equal to ε u = 0.003.
The maximum concrete compressive strain at crushing of concrete has been measured in many tests of both plain and
reinforced concrete members. The test results from a series of reinforced concrete beams and columns specimen
indicate that the maximum concrete compressive strain varies from 0.003 to as high as 0.008. However, the maximum
strain for practical cases is 0.003 to 0.004. Though the maximum strain decreases with increasing compressive
strength, the 0.003 value allowed for design is reasonably conservative.
For deformed reinforcement, it is reasonably accurate to assume that below the yield stress, the stress in the
reinforcement is proportional to strain (Hooke’s Law). For practical design, the increase in the strength because of
strain hardening of the reinforcement is neglected for strength computation. See figure below.
The force developed in the tensile or compressive reinforcement is a function of the strain in the reinforcement ε s,
such that:
fs = E s ε s
A s fs = A s E s ε s
when εs ≥ εy:
fs = E s ε y = fy
A s fs = A s fy
where εs is the value from the strain diagram at the location of reinforcement. For design, the modulus of elasticity of
steel reinforcement, Es, is taken as 200,000 MPa (29, 000, 000 psi).
Design Assumption #4
Tensile strength of concrete shall be neglected in flexural calculations of reinforced concrete.
The tensile strength of concrete in flexure, known as the modulus of rupture, is a more variable property than the
compressive strength, and is about 8% to 12% of the compressive strength. The generally acceptable value is
7.5 𝑓′𝑐 for normal weight concrete. This tensile strength in flexure is neglected in strength design. For practical
percentages of reinforcement, the resulting computed strengths are in good agreement with test results. For very
small percentages of reinforcement, neglecting the tensile strength of concrete is conservative. It should be realized,
Design Assumption #5
Relationship between compressive stress distribution and concrete strain shall be assumed to be
rectangular, trapezoidal, parabolic, or any shape that results in prediction of strength in substantial
agreement with results of comprehensive test.
This assumption recognizes the inelastic stress distribution in concrete at high stresses. As maximum stress is
approached, the stress-strain relationship of concrete is not a straight line (stress is not proportional to strain). The
general stress-strain behavior of concrete is shown below.
Design Assumption #6
Requirements of Design Assumption #5 may be considered satisfied by an equivalent rectangular
concrete stress distribution defined as follows: A concrete stress of 0.85f’ c shall be assumed
uniformly distributed over an equivalent compression zone bounded by edges of the cross-section
and a straight line located parallel to the neutral axis at a distance a=β1c from the fiber of maximum
compressive strain. Distance c from the fiber of maximum compressive strain to the neutral axis
shall be measured in a direction perpendicular to that axis. Fraction β1 shall be taken as 0.85 for
strengths f’c 2400 psi (17 MPa) up to 4000 psi (28 MPa) and shall be reduced continuously at a rate
of 0.05 for each 1000 psi (7 MPa) of strength in excess of 4000 psi, but β1 shall not be less than
0.65.
1. Gravity always works, so if you do not provide permanent support, something will
fail.
2. A chain reaction will make a small fault into a large failure, unless you can afford a
fail-safe design, where sufficient residual support is available when one component
fails. In the competitive private construction industry, such design procedure is
beyond consideration.
3. It only requires a small error or oversight – in design, in detail, in material strength,
in assembly, or in protective measures – to cause a large failure.
4. Eternal vigilance is necessary to avoid small errors. If there are no capable crews or
group leaders on the job and in design office, then supervision must take over the
chore of local control. Inspection service and construction management cannot be
relied on as a secure substitute.
5. Just as a ship cannot be run by two captains, a construction job cannot be run by a
committee. It must be run by one individual, with full authority to plan, direct, hire,
and fire, and full responsibility for production and safety.
6. Craftsmanship is needed on the part of the designer, the vendor, and the
construction teams.
7. An unbuildable design is not buildable, and some recent attempts at producing
striking architecture are approaching the limit of safe buildability, even with our
most sophisticated equipment and techniques.
8. There is no foolproof design; there is no foolproof construction method, without
guidance and proper and careful control.
9. The best way to generate a failure on you job is to disregard the lessons to be
learned from someone else’s failure.
10. A little loving care can cure many ills. A little careful control of a job can avoid
many accidents and failures.