0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views11 pages

Reading Part

Uploaded by

yoonzinno0404
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views11 pages

Reading Part

Uploaded by

yoonzinno0404
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Archaeologists discover evidence of prehistoric island settlers

In early April 2019, Dr Ceri Shipton and his colleagues from Australian
National University became the first archaeologists to explore Obi, one of
many tropical islands in Indonesia's Maluku Utara province. The
research team's discoveries suggest that the prehistoric people who lived
on Obi were adept on both land and sea, hunting in the dense rainforest,
foraging on the seashore, and possibly even voyaging between islands.
The excavations were part of a project to learn more about how people
first dispersed from mainland Asia, through the Indonesian archipelago
and into the prehistoric continent that once connected Australia and New
Guinea. The team's earlier research suggested that the northernmost
islands in the group, known as the Wallacean islands, including Obi,
would have offered the easiest migration route. It also seemed likely that
these islands were crucial 'stepping stones' on humans' island-hopping
voyages through this region millennia ago. But to support this idea, they
needed archaeological evidence for humans living in this remote area in
the ancient past. So, they travelled to Obi to look for sites that might
reveal evidence of early occupation.
Just inland from the village of Kelo on Obi's northern coast, Shipton and
his colleagues found two caves containing prehistoric rock shelters that
were suitable for excavation. With the permission and help of the local
people of Kelo, they dug a small test excavation in each shelter. There
they found numerous artefacts, including fragments of axes, some dating
to about 14,000 years ago. The earliest axes at Kelo were made using
clam shells. Axes made from clam shells from roughly the same time had
also previously been found elsewhere in this region, including on the
nearby island of Gebe to the northeast. As on Gebe, it is highly likely that
Obi's axes were used in the construction of canoes, thus allowing these
early peoples to maintain connections between communities on
neighbouring islands.
The oldest cultural layers from the Kelo site provided the team with the
earliest record for human occupation on Obi, dating back around 18,000
years. At this time the climate was drier and colder than today, and the
island's dense rainforests would likely have been much less
impenetrable than they are now. Sea levels were about 120 metres
lower, meaning Obi was a much larger island, encompassing what is
today the separate island of Bisa, as well as several other small islands
nearby.
Roughly 11,700 years ago, as the most recent ice age ended, the climate
became significantly warmer and wetter, no doubt making Obi's jungle
much thicker. According to the researchers, it is no coincidence that
around this time the first axes crafted from stone rather than sea shells
appear, likely in response to their heavy-duty use for clearing and
modification of the increasingly dense rainforest. While stone takes about
twice as long to grind into an axes compared to shell, the harder
material keeps its sharp edge for longer.
Judging by the bones which the researchers unearthed in the Kelo
caves, people living there mainly hunted the Rothschild's cuscus, a
possum-like creature that still lives on Obi today. As the forest grew more
dense, people probably used axes to clear patches of forest and make
hunting easier.
Shipton's team's excavation of the shelters at the Kelo site unearthed a
volcanic glass substance called obsidian, which must have been brought
over from another island, as there is no known source on Obi. It also
revealed particular types of beads, similar to those previously found on
islands in southern Wallacea. These finds again support the idea that Obi
islanders routinely travelled to other islands.
The excavations suggest people successfully lived in the two Kelo
shelters for about 10,000 years. But then, about 8,000 years ago, both
were abandoned. Did the residents leave Obi completely, or move
elsewhere on the island? Perhaps the jungle had grown so thick that
axes were no longer a match for the dense undergrowth. Perhaps people
simply moved to the coast and turned to fishing rather than hunting as a
means of survival.
Whatever the reason for the departure, there is no evidence for use of
the Kelo shelters after this time, until about 1,000 years ago, when they
were re-occupied by people who owned pottery as well as items made
out of gold and silver. It seems likely, in view of Obi's location, that this
final phase of occupation also saw the Kelo shelters used by people
involved in the historic trade in spices between the Maluku islands and
the rest of the world.

Questions 1-7. Do the following statements agree with the


information given in Reading Passage 1?
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this

1. Archaeological research had taken place on the island of Obi


before the arrival of Ceri Shipton and his colleagues.
2. At the Keio sites, the researchers found the first clam shell axes
ever to be discovered in the region.
3. The size of Obi today is less than it was 18,000 years ago.

4. A change in the climate around 11,700 years ago had a greater


impact on Obi than on the surrounding islands.

5. The researchers believe there is a connection between warmer,


wetter weather and a change in the material used to make axes.

6. Shipton’s team were surprised to find evidence of the Obi


islanders’ hunting practices.

7. It is thought that the Keio shelters were occupied continuously


until about 1,000 years ago.
Questions 8-13. Complete the notes below.
Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer.
Archaeological findings on Obi Excavations of rock shelters inside
8____________ near the village of Kelo revealed: · axes from around
14,000 years ago, probably used to make canoes · axes made out of 9
______________, dating from around 11,700 years ago · 10
_____________ of an animal: evidence of what ancient islanders ate ·
evidence of travel between islands:
- obsidian: a material that is not found naturally on Obi
– 11___________ which resembled ones found on other islands. It is
thought that from 8,000 years ago, Obi islanders: · may have switched
from hunting to fishing · had 12___________ as well as items made out
of metal · probably took part in the production and sale of
13_____________
The global importance of wetlands
A Wetlands are areas where water covers the soil, or is present either at
or near the surface of the soil, for all or part of the year. These are
complex ecosystems, rich in unique plant and animal life. But according
to the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWFN), half of the world's wetlands
have disappeared since 1990 — converted or destroyed for commercial
development, drainage schemes and the extraction of minerals and
peat*. Many of those that remain have been damaged by agricultural
pesticides and fertilisers, industrial pollutants, and construction works.
B Throughout history, humans have gathered around wetlands, and
their fertile ecosystems have played an important part in human
development. Consequently, they are of considerable religious, historical
and archaeological value to many communities around the world.
'Wetlands directly support the livelihoods and well-being of millions of
people,' says Dr Matthew McCartney, principal researcher and
hydrologist at the International Water Management Institute (IWMI). 'In
many developing countries, large numbers of people are dependent on
wetland agriculture for their livelihoods.'
C They also serve a crucial environmental purpose. 'Wetlands are
one of the key tools in mitigating climate change across the planet,' says
Pieter van Eijk, head of Climate Adaptation at Wetlands International
(WI), pointing to their use as buffers that protect coastal areas from
sea-level rise and extreme weather events such as hurricanes and
flooding. Wetland coastal forests provide food and water, as well as
shelter from storms, and WI and other agencies are working to restore
those forests which have been lost. 'It can be as simple as planting a few
trees per hectare to create shade and substantially change a
microclimate,' he says. 'Implementing climate change projects isn't so
much about money.'
D The world's wetlands are, unfortunately, rich sources for
in-demand commodities, such as palm oil and pulpwood. Peatlands —
wetlands with a waterlogged organic soil layer — are particularly
targeted. When peatlands are drained for cultivation, they become net
carbon emitters instead of active carbon stores, and, according to Marcel
Silvius, head of Climate-smart Land-use at WI, this practice causes six
per cent of all global carbon emissions. The clearance of peatlands for
planting also increases the risk of forest fires, which release huge
amounts of CO2. 'We're seeing huge peatland forests with extremely
high biodiversity value being lost for a few decades of oil palm revenues,'
says Silvius.
E The damage starts when logging companies arrive to clear the
trees. They dig ditches to enter the peat swamps by boat and then float
the logs out the same way. These are then used to drain water out of the
peatlands to allow for the planting of corn, oil palms or pulpwood trees.
Once the water has drained away, bacteria and fungi then break down
the carbon in the peat and turn it into CO2 and methane. Meanwhile, the
remainder of the solid matter in the peat starts to move downwards, in a
process known as subsidence". Peat comprises 90 per cent water, so
this is one of the most alarming consequences of peatland clearances.
'In the tropics, peat subsides at about four centimetres a year, so within
half a century, very large landscapes on Sumatra and Borneo will
become flooded as the peat drops below water level,' says Silvius. 'It's a
huge catastrophe that's in preparation. Some provinces will lose 40 per
cent of their landmass.
F And while these industries affect wetlands in ways that can easily
be documented,
Dr Dave Tickner of the WWFN believes that more subtle impacts can be
even more devastating. 'Sediment run-off and fertilisers can be pretty
invisible,' says Tickner. 'Over-extraction of water is equally invisible. You
do get shock stories about rivers running red, or even catching fire, but
there's seldom one big impact that really hurts a wetland.' Tickner does
not blame anyone for deliberate damage, however. 'I've worked on
wetland issues for 20 years and have never met anybody who wanted to
damage a wetland,' he says. 'It isn't something that people generally set
out to do. Quite often, the effects simply come from people trying to
make a living.'
G Silvius also acknowledges the importance of income generation.
'It's not that we just want to restore the biodiversity of wetlands — which
we do — but we recognise there's a need to provide an income for local
people.' This approach is supported by IWMI. 'The idea is that people in
a developing country will only protect wetlands if they value and profit
from them,' says McCartney. 'For sustainability, it's essential that local
people are involved in wetland planning and decision making and have
clear rights to use wetlands.'
H The fortunes of wetlands would be improved, Silvius suggests, if
more governments recognised their long-term value. 'Different
governments have different attitudes,' he says, and goes on to explain
that some countries place a high priority on restoring wetlands, while
others still deny the issue. McCartney is cautiously optimistic, however.
'Awareness of the importance of wetlands is growing,' he says. 'It's true
that wetland degradation still continues at a rapid pace, but my
impression is that things are slowly changing.'
______________________
subsidence: the sinking of the Earth's surface. most often caused by the
removal of resources from the ground
Questions 14-17. Reading Passage 2 has eight paragraphs, A—H.
Which paragraph contains the following information?
14. reference to the need to ensure that inhabitants of wetland regions
continue to benefit from them
15. the proportion of wetlands which have already been lost.
16. reference to the idea that people are beginning to appreciate the
value of wetlands.
17. mention of the cultural significance of wetlands.

Questions 18-22. Complete the sentences below.


Choose ONE WORD ONLY from the passage for each answer
18. Peatlands which have been drained begin to release
18______________________
instead of storing it.
19. Once peatland areas have been cleared, 19__________________
are more likely to occur.
20. Clearing peatland forests to make way for oil palm plantations
destroys the 20_____________ of the local environment.
21. Water is drained out of peatlands through 21________________ the
which are created by logging companies.
22. Draining peatlands leads to 22______________ a serious problem
which can eventually result in coastal flooding and land loss.

Questions 23-26. Look at the following statements (Questions


23-26) and the list of experts below. Match each statement with the
correct expert, A-D.
List of Experts
A Matthew
McCartney
B Pieter van Eijk
C Marcel Silvius
D Dave Tickner
23. Communities living in wetland regions must be included in
discussions about the future of these areas.
24. Official policies towards wetlands vary from one nation to the next.
25. People cause harm to wetlands without having any intention to do so.
26. Initiatives to reverse environmental damage need not be complex.
Is the era of artificial speech translation upon us?
Once the stuff of science fiction, technology that enables people to talk
using different languages is now here. But how effective is it?
Noise, Alex Waibel tells me, is one of the major challenges that artificial
speech translation has to meet. A device may be able to recognise
speech in a laboratory, or a meeting room, but will struggle to cope with
the kind of background noise I can hear in my office surrounding
Professor Waibel as he speaks to me from Kyoto station in Japan. I'm
struggling to follow him in English, on a scratchy line that reminds me we
are nearly 10,000 kilometres apart — and that distance is still an
obstacle to communication even if you're speaking the same language,
as we are. We haven't reached the future yet. If we had, Waibel would
have been able to speak more comfortably in his native German and I
would have been able to hear his words in English.
At Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, where he is a professor of computer
science, Waibel and his colleagues already give lectures in German that
their students can follow in English via an electronic translator. The
system generates text that students can read on their laptops or phones,
so the process is somewhat similar to subtitling. It helps that lecturers
speak clearly, don't have to compete with background chatter, and say
much the same thing each year.
The idea of artificial speech translation has been around for a long time.
Douglas Adams' science fiction novel, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the
Galaxy, published in 1979, featured a life form called the 'Babel fish'
which, when placed in the ear, enabled a listener to understand any
language in the universe. It came to represent one of those devices that
technology enthusiasts dream of long before they become practically
realisable, like TVs flat enough to hang on walls: objects that we once
could only dream of having but that are now commonplace. Now devices
that look like prototype Babel fish have started to appear, riding a wave
of advances in artificial translation and voice recognition.
At this stage, however, they seem to be regarded as eye-catching
novelties rather than steps towards what Waibel calls 'making a
language-transparent society'. They tend to be domestic devices or
applications suitable for hotel check-ins, for example, providing a
practical alternative to speaking traveller's English. The efficiency of the
translator is less important than the social function. However,
'Professionals are less inclined to be patient in a conversation,' founder
and CEO at Waverly Labs, Andrew Ochoa, observes. To redress this,
Waverly is now preparing a new model for professional applications,
which entails performance improvements in speech recognition,
translation accuracy and the time it takes to deliver the translated
speech.
For a conversation, both speakers need to have devices called Pilots
(translator earpieces) in their ears. ‘We find that there’s a barrier with
sharing one of the earphones with a stranger,’ says Ochoa. That can’t
have been totally unexpected. The problem would be solved if earpiece
translators became sufficiently prevalent that strangers would be likely to
already have their own in their cars. Whether that happens, and how
quickly, will probably depend not so much on the earpieces themselves,
but on the prevalence of voice-controlled devices and artificial translation
in general.
Waibel highlights the significance of certain Asian nations, noting that
voice translation has really taken off in countries such as Japan with a
range of systems. There is still a long way to go, though. A translation
system needs to be simultaneous, like the translator’s voice speaking
over the foreign politician being interviewed on the TV, rather than in
sections that oblige speakers to pauseafter every few remarks and wait
for the translation to be delivered. It needs to work offline, for situations
where internet access isn’t possible, and to address apprehensions
about the amount of private speech data accumulating in the cloud,
having been sent to servers for processing.
Systems not only need to cope with physical challenges such as noise,
they will also need to be socially aware by addressing people in the right
way. Some cultural traditions demand solemn respect for academic
status, for example, and it is only polite to respect this.
Etiquette-sensitive artificial translators could relieve people of the need to
know these differing cultural norms. At the same time, they might help to
preserve local customs, slowing the spread of habits associated with
international English, such as its readiness to get on first-name terms.
Professors and other professionals will not outsource language
awareness to software, though. If the technology matures into seamless,
ubiquitous artificial speech translation, it will actually add value to
language skills. Whether it will help people conduct their family lives or
relationships is open to question though one noteworthy possibility is that
it could overcome the language barriers that often arise between
generations after migration, leaving children and their grandparents
without a shared language.
Whatever uses it is put to, though, it will never be as good as the real
thing. Even if voice- morphing technology simulates the speaker’s voice,
their lip movements won’t match, and they will look like they are in a
dubbed movie. The contrast will underline the value of shared languages,
and the value of learning them. Sharing a language can promote a sense
of belonging and community, as with the international scientists who use
English as a lingua franca, where their predecessors used Latin. Though
the practical need for a common language will diminish, the social value
of sharing one will persist. And software will never be a substitute for the
subtle but vital understanding that comes with knowledge of a language.
Questions 27-30. Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.

27. What does the reader learn about the conversation in the first
paragraph?
A. The speakers are communicating in different languages.

B. Neither of the speakers is familiar with their environment.

C. The topic of the conversation is difficult for both speakers.

D. Aspects of the conversation are challenging for both speakers.

28. What assists the electronic translator during lectures at


Karlsruhe Institute of Technology?
A. the repeated content of lectures

B. the students’ reading skills


C. the languages used

D. the lecturers’ technical ability

29. When referring to The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, the


writer suggests that
A. the Babel fish was considered undesirable at the time.

B. this book was not seriously intending to predict the future.

C. artificial speech translation was not a surprising development.

D. some speech translation techniques are better than others.

30. What does the writer say about sharing earpieces?


A. It is something people will get used to doing.

B. The reluctance to do this is understandable.

C. The equipment will be unnecessary in the future.

D. It is something few people need to worry about.

Questions 31-34. Complete each sentence with the correct ending,


A-F, below.
Abut there are concerns about this.
as systems do not need to conform to standard
B practices.
Cbut they are far from perfect.
Ddespite the noise issues.
E because translation is immediate.
F and have an awareness of good manners.
31. Speech translation methods are developing fast in Japan.
32. TV interviews that use translation voiceover methods are successful.
33. Future translation systems should address people appropriately.
34. Users may be able to maintain their local customs.

Questions 35-40. Do the following statements agree with the views


of the writer in Reading Passage 3?
YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer
NO if the statement contradicts the views of the writer
NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to say what the writer thinks about this
35. Language translation systems will be seen as very useful
throughout the academicand professional worlds.

36. The overall value of automated translation to family life is yet to


be shown.

37. Automated translation could make life more difficult for


immigrant families.

38. Visual aspects of language translation are being considered by


scientists.

39. International scientists have found English easier to translate


into other languages than Latin.

40. As far as language is concerned, there is a difference between


people's social and practical needs.

You might also like