IM-CRIMC-1-CHAPTER-5
IM-CRIMC-1-CHAPTER-5
MODULE 5
VICTIMS AND OFFENDERS
INTRODUCTION
Over the years, idea about victim precipitation have come to be perceived as a
negative thing; “victim blaming” it is called. Research into ways in which victims
“contribute” to their own victimization is considered by victims and victim advocates both
unacceptable and destructive.
Today, the concept of victim includes any person who experiences any injury,
loss, or hardship due to any cause. Also today, the word victim is used rather
indiscriminately; e.g. cancer victims, holocaust victims, accident victims, victims of
injustice, hurricane victims, crime victims, and others. The thing that all these usages
have in common is an image of someone who has suffered injury and harm by forces
beyond his/her control.
Crime victim generally refers to any person, group, or entity who has suffered
injury or loss due to illegal activity. The harm can be physical, psychological, or
economic.
MOTIVATION QUESTION
GOALS OF VICTIMOLOGY
The study of victimology focuses on five goals:
1. To understand and measure the extent and nature of crime as victims perceive
them.
2. To assess the relative risk of victimization.
3. To appreciate the nature and extent of losses, injuries and damages experienced
by victims of crime.
4. To study the relation between the victim and offender.
5. To investigate the social reaction of the family, community, and society toward
the victim of crime.
HISTORY OF VICTIMOLOGY
At first, (going back to the origins of criminology in the 1880s), anything
resembling victimology was simply the study of crime from the perspective of the victim.
With the exemption of some psychological profilers who do this, nobody really advocates
this approach to victimology anymore. The scientific study of victimology can be traced
back in the 1940s and 1950s.
Mendelsohn interviewed victims to obtain information, and his analysis led him to
believe that most victims had an “unconscious aptitude for being victimized.” He created
a typology of six (6) types of victims, with only the
Benjamin Mendelsohn Hans Von Hentig
first type, the innocent, portrayed as just being in the
wrong place at the wrong time. The other five types Photo Source: images/google.com
Von Hentig studied victim’s homicide, and said that the most likely type of victim
is the “depressive type” who is an easy target, careless and unsuspecting. The “greedy
type” is easily duped because his or her motivation for easy gain lowers his or her
natural tendency to be suspicious. The “wanton type” is particularly vulnerable to
stresses that occur in a given period of time in the life cycle, such as juvenile victims.
The “tormentor,” is the victim of an attack from the target of his or her abuse, such as
with battered women.
Criminology is rather broad field of study that encompasses the study of law
making, law breaking, and societal reactions to law breaking.
Victimology, much like criminal justice, fall into the third of these areas.
Victimology does not have any subfields within itself; in fact, there are few theories, and
little or no school of thought.
Going back to criminology, there are four subfields: penology (and the sociology
of law); delinquency (sometimes referred to as psychological criminology); comparative
(and historical) criminology; and victimology.
1. Victimization
2. Victim – offender relationships
3. Victim – criminal justice system relationships
4. Victims and the media
5. Victims and the costs of crime
6. Victims and social movements
THEORIES OF VICTIMOLOGY
Over the years, ideas about victim precipitation has come to be perceived as a
negative thing; “victim blaming” it is called. Research into ways in which victims
“contribute” to their own victimization is considered by victims and victim advocates as
both unacceptable and destructive. Yet a few enduring models and near – theories exist,
such as the following:
This one is found in the variety of criminological studies, from prison riots
to strain theories. The idea is that conditions that support crime can be classified
into three general categories:
a. Precipitating factors – time, space, being in the wrong place at the wrong time;
b. Attracting factors – choices, options, lifestyles (the sociological expression
“lifestyle” refers to daily routine activities as well as special events one engages
in on a predictable basis);
c. Predisposing factors – all the sociodemographic characteristics of victims,
being male, being young, being poor, being a minority, living in squalor, being
single, being employed.
Example:
a. Someone who is opposed to his or her views may target a political
activist.
b. An employee may target a recently promoted employee if he or she
believes they deserved the promotion.
2. Lifestyle Theory
This theory suggests that certain people may become the victims of
crimes because of their lifestyles and choices.
Example:
a. Someone with a gambling or substance addiction could be as an “easy
victim” by a con artist.
b. Walking alone at night in a dangerous area, conspicuously wearing
expensive jewelry, leaving doors unlocked and associating with known
criminals are other lifestyle characteristics that may lead to victimization.
CRIME VICTIM
constitutional law, with “hate crime” being an emerging criminal law development,
although criminal law tends tend to treat all cases as individualized.
Besides “primary crime victims”, there are also “secondary crime victims” who
experience the harm second hand, such as intimate partners or significant others of rape
victims or children of a battered woman. It may also make sense to talk about “tertiary
crime victims” who experience the harm vicariously, such as through media accounts or
from watching television. Victim defenses have recently emerged in cases of parricide
(killing one’s parents) and homicide of batterers by abused spouses. Advocates for
battered women were among the first to recognize the issue, and promote the “battered
women syndrome” to defend women who killed or seriously injured a spouse or partner
after enduring years of physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse.
Victim in General
In general, victim means any person who, by reason of natural disaster or man-
made cause, individually or collectively, has suffered harm, including physical or mental
injury, emotional suffering, economic loss or substantial impairment of his/her
fundamental rights, through acts or omissions that are in violation of criminal laws,
including those proscribing abuse of power.
c. Economic – economic harm may include loss of property like family house,
business establishment and the like.
The experience of victimization results in an increasing fear of the victim of the crime
and the spread of fear in the community.
CONSEQUENCES OF CRIME
Emotional distress as a result of crime is a recurring theme for all victims of
crime. The most common problem affecting three quarters of victims was psychological
problems including:
Models of Victimization
b. Stage of Recoil – This stage occurs during which the victim formulates
psychological defenses and deals with conflicting emotions of guilt, anger,
acceptance and desire of revenge (this could last 3 to 8 months).
c. Reorganization Stage – this stage occurs during which victims puts
his/her life back to normal daily living.
a. Pre-impact Stage – this describes the state of the victim prior to being
victimized.
b. Impact Stage – this is the phase in which victimization occurs.
c. Post-impact Stage – this stage entails the degree and duration of the
personal and social disorganization following victimization.
d. Behavioral Outcome – this phase describes the victim’s adjustment to the
victimization experience.
1. Direct or Primary Crime Victim – this kind of victim directly suffers the harm or
injury which is physical, psychological and economic losses.
2. Indirect or Secondary Crime Victim – victims who experience the harm second
hand, such as intimate partners or significant others of rape victims or children of
a battered woman. This may include family members of the primary victims.
However, Karmen also included first responders and rescue workers who race to
crime scenes (such as police officers, forensic evidence technicians, paramedics,
fire-fighters and the like) as secondary victims because they are also exposed to
emergencies and trauma on such a routine basis and that they also need
emotional support themselves.
3. Tertiary Crime Victim – victims who experience the crime vicariously, such as
through media accounts, the scared public or community due to watching news
regarding crime incidents.
Note:The Supreme Court of the United States first recognized the rights of crime victims
to make a victim impact statement in the sentencing phase of a criminal trial in the case
of Payne vs. Tennessee 501 U.S. 808 (1991).
Victim Assistance
The following are the ideal supports to be given to the victims:
1. Victims should receive the necessary material, medical, psychological and social
assistance through governmental, voluntary, community-based and indigenous
means.
2. Victims should be informed of the availability of health and social services and
other relevant assistance and be readily afforded access to them.
3. Police, justice, health, social service and other personnel concerned should
receive training to sensitize them to the needs of the victims, and guidelines to
ensure proper and prompt aid.
4. In providing services and assistance to victims, attention should be given to
those who have special needs because of the nature of the harm inflicted or
because of factors such as those mentioned in paragraph 3 above.
1. Innocent – portrayed as just being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
2. Victim with only minor guilt and was victimized due to ignorance.
3. Victim who is just as guilty as the offender and the voluntary victim. Suicide
case is common to this category.
4. The victim guiltier than the offender – this category was described as
containing persons who provoked the criminal or actively induced their own
victimization.
5. The Most Guilty Victim “who is guilty alone” – an attacker killed by a would-
be victim in the fact of defending himself is an example of this.
6. The Imaginary Victim – a victim suffering from mental disorders, or those
victims with extreme mental abnormalities.
According to Mendelsohn, the last five types all contributed somehow to their
own injury, and presented as victim precipitation.
2. Greedy of Gain or Acquisitive Type – a person who lacks all normal inhibitions
and well-founded suspicions. This person is easily duped because his/her
motivation for easy gain lowers his/her natural tendency to be suspicious.
3. Wanton or Overly Sensual Type – a victim where “female’s foibles play a role.
This victim is particularly vulnerable to stresses that occur at a given period of
time in the life cycle, such as juvenile victims. Further, this victim is ruled by
passion and thoughtlessly seeking pleasure.
4. Tormentor Type – the victim of attack from the target of his/her abuse, such as
battered women. The most primitive way of solving a personal conflict is to
annihilate physically the cause of trouble.
5. Lonesome Type – this is the same with the acquisitive type of victim, by virtue of
wanting companionship or affection.
6. Heartbroken Type – this victim is emotionally disturbed by virtue of heartaches
or pains.
This action was exemplified by ideals contained in the 1948 United Nations
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and also by other governmental and non-
governmental programs involving victim assistance, advocacy, compensation,
reparation, reconciliation, restoration and reintegration.
1. Primary Prevention
Primary prevention can be done in any context or location, whether a
residence, workplace, school, neighborhood, community, or society. Primary
prevention involves altering the environment in such a way that the root causes
or at least the facilitators of crime are eliminated.
c. Routine Activity Theory - Routine Activity Theory posits a high rate of potential
victims becoming actual victims whenever three things occur in space and time
together: the absence of capable guardians; an abundance of motivated
offenders; and suitable targets.
d. Broken Window Theory - Broken Window Theory argues that sign of decay,
disorder and civilities, such as abandoned buildings, broken street lights, and
graffiti all invite potential criminals to an area.
2. Secondary Prevention
Secondary prevention involves a focus upon specific problems, places,
and times with the twin goals, of reducing situation-specific opportunities for
crime and increasing the risk of committing crime. This is called Situational Crime
Prevention. Secondary Prevention is most typically based on well-established
law enforcement practices, such as:
3. Tertiary Prevention
Tertiary Prevention is a term taken from the field of medicine to describe
the procedures to be taken after the disease or threat is manifest. Such
procedures typically serve a deterrence or minimization of harm purpose, and are
almost always characterized by being reactive, or after the fact. Examples would
include personal injury or property insurance as well as self-protective measures
engage in by those who have been victimized previously. Carrying a non-
concealed self-protective device or walking in a self-confident manner
accomplishes the purpose of deterrence. Carrying a concealed device or whistle
to blow for help accomplishes the purpose of minimization, or at least the chance
for an unsuccessful criminal outcome.
First of all, we need to know who the victims are. While crime victim related
research of 40 to 50 years ago examined the characteristics of victims, much of it
approached the issue from the perspective of “shared responsibility”, that is how crime
victims were, in part, “responsible” for their victimization.
In recent decades, the paradigm has shifted. The contemporary study of the
characteristics of crime victims has tended the focus of identifying risk factor in order to
better understand the phenomena, without attributing blame to the victims. Information
about the risk for victimization has been used to develop crime prevention and
enforcement strategies.
Sex – with the exception of sexual assault than women. Lifetime risk of homicide is three
to four times higher for men than women.
Age – adolescence have substantially higher rates of assault than young adults or older
Americans. Data from the National Crime Victimization Survey indicated that 12 to 19
years olds are 2 to 3 times as likely as those over 20 to become victims of personal
crime each year. Data from the National Women’s Study indicated that 62% of all
forcible rape cases occurred when the victim was under 18 years of age.
Urban – Crime and Victimization is mostly an urban problem. Urban areas have a
dangerous amount of transience (strangers moving in and out of town), heterogeneity
(mix of different people and places), and disorganization (dilapidation of housing and
buildings).
Ethnicity – racial and ethnic minorities have higher rates of assault than other
Americans. African-Americans are six times more likely than white Americans to be
homicide victims. Rates of violent assault are approximately twice as high for African –
and Hispanic-Americans are significantly more likely than White-Americans to have ever
been victims of violent crime.
1. Law Enforcement
As “first responders” to most crimes, police department serve a critical
and primary role in providing immediate intervention and assistance to victims of
crime. Unlike most social service agencies, police departments are typically open
every day of the year, 24-hours-a-day. As such, there is tremendous
responsibility in the part of law enforcement officers and civilian personnel to
provide sensitive and supportive victim services.
2. Prosecution
If the law enforcement has investigated crimes and suspects have been
arrested, the cases are then referred to prosecutors. Although each state’s laws
and procedures provide for different ways to initiate a criminal action, these are
leading to charging and arraignment.
3. Court
Assuming a case goes beyond the plea negotiation stage, during the trial,
the defendant continues to receive basic protections granted by the constitution,
state constitutions and various state law holdings. Volumes of materials are
available on defendant’s rights. These include, for example, the right to obtain all
exculpatory evidence from the prosecution, which would tend to prove the
innocence of the defendant. Also, the defendant has the right to confront and
cross-examine his/her accusers. Often, this is very difficult for the victim, who
must be well prepared to withstand the onslaught of cross-examination by
aggressive defense counsel.
4. Correction
In the Philippines, if an accused is sentenced (3 years above) to a term of
imprisonment, the Bureau of Correction assumes responsibility for convicts’
supervision. The offender’s file that contains details of the crime, court case and
sentence, victim impact statement (when applicable), recommendations for
treatment and services during the period of incarceration and personal
information, are utilized as bases for offenders’ classification.
5. Community
The last pillar of the Philippine Criminal Justice System; it is where a
person (prisoner), after service of his/her sentence is released into. Community is
a place where a well-developed person after having been reformed in the prison
starts a new life.
For this activity, you need to create your own mini glossary.
Based on the lessons given, choose 10 important terminologies.
Provide the meaning of those chosen words. You may research and
add definitions, provided it is connected to our lesson.
Encode it in a short size bond paper with your own chosen
background.
Arrange it in alphabetical order.
Each terminology is equivalent to 3 points.