Battlecard Cynet Vs TrendMicro
Battlecard Cynet Vs TrendMicro
Designed for lean security teams Designed for large teams…and large
Cynet 360 reduces the burden on security teams by budgets
streamlining security operations and automating Full protection from Trend Micro Vision One
investigation and remediation processes. requires multiple products and licenses, increasing
complexity and overall TCO.
Visibility across multiple layers You can’t protect what you can’t see
Cynet provides intuitive visibility across endpoints, Trend Micro does not provide visibility into user-
user, cloud and network-based threats. based threats, while visibility into network-based
threats requires a separate license.
Competitive Analysis: Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ vs. Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One 1
Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ Difference
Detailed Explanation
Attack Detection Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One provides on-prem, virtual and
& Prevention cloud workloads with advanced endpoint prevention and detection
of file/process based attacks (malware, exploits, etc.). However, Trend
Micro Deep Security lacks the ability to identify and block attacks
that manifests only in anomalous network traffic (lateral movement,
data exfiltration and network-based credential theft) or user behavior
(anomalous login of compromised user account).
Response Coverage
Advanced cyberattacks leave their mark across all parts of the targeted
environment: endpoints, files, process, user accounts and network
traffic.
Unlike Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One that has a limited number of
endpoints/file remediations (isolate, kill process and delete/quarantine
file), Cynet AutoXDR provides a complete set of remediation tools for
infected endpoints, malicious files/processes, compromised user
accounts and attacker-controlled traffic. Moreover, Cynet AutoXDR
can act as a response orchestration interface that communicates with
core components such as firewalls and Active Directory to expand the
response process across the entire environment.
Automation
Cynet AutoXDR supports the use of preset and user-created created
remediation playbooks that automate response for detected threats
by chaining together several discreet remediation actions (for example,
isolate the endpoint + disable user account in Active Directory as an
automated response user account compromise detection). These
playbooks both scale the security team alert-handling capacity by
automating repetitive tasks and radically increase the share of attacks
that are autonomously addressed and resolved by Cynet AutoXDR
without need of human intervention.
Monitoring & Control Continuous monitoring of all entities and activities in the environment
is enables users to discover exposed attack surfaces and address them
(vulnerable systems and apps, unchanged user passwords, etc.), and by
that eliminate the risk of up to 60% of common attack vectors.
Competitive Analysis: Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ vs. Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One 2
Cynet 360 AutoXDR vs. Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One
Comparison
Signature Based
Credential Theft
(LLNMR/NBT-NS attacks)
Deception
Competitive Analysis: Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ vs. Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One 3
Response
Remediation
Orchestration
Automation
Vulnerability Management
Inventory Reports
Competitive Analysis: Cynet 360 AutoXDR™ vs. Trend Micro Vision One + Apex One 4