Chapter -5

Conclusion

5.1 Major Findings

5.2 Suggestions

5.3 Future Research

237
5.1 Major Findings

Demographics

18 to 28 year old respondents had the greatest selection percentage (36.2%),

while 38 to 48 year old respondents had the lowest selection percentage. This
suggests that young individuals made up the bulk of the study's responses.
Male make up 71.4% of the 301 survey participants, while women make up
28.6%. Male are more responsible for handling investment decisions and
financial commitments, thus it is clear from the table above that the sample
has a justifiable distribution of responses. Around 89 percent of the 301 total
respondents, who are independent, belong to the service class. 3% of the
population is self-employed, whereas 8% of the population is business class.
The investigation of how perception differed by job was made possible
because to this categorisation, which was essential.

Out of the 301 total respondents, almost 37% are members, as shown by the
income level analysis in the table above, who had monthly incomes of more
than 1 lakh. 35% of the sample's respondents have monthly incomes under
$25,000, while 27% have incomes between $25,000 and $1 million. Since it
enabled the investigation of how perception changed by income categories,
this categorization was essential.

The respondents who were selected for the study were split into three groups
based on their monthly investment: up to Rs. 5,000, between Rs. 5,000 and
50,000, and over Rs. 50,000. The 81% of respondents have the financial
means to make monthly investments in various investment portfolios between
Rs. 5,000 and Rs. 50,000, while 15.6% of respondents make monthly
investments beyond Rs. 50,000. This shows that the majority of research
participants are interested in potential investment opportunities.

59.5% of the 301 survey participants who were chosen to participate live in
nuclear families, while 40.5% are part of joint family structures. Therefore, it
is clear from the table above that the sample includes respondents who are
varied in terms of their family structure.

238
Investment avenues

The majority of respondents (75%) decide to invest in equity shares or debt

securities. A publicly listed company's equity shares represent a piece of
ownership, and holders of these shares stand to gain from the expansion and
success of the business. 71.4% of respondents choose company deposits as
their investment options. Non-banking financial firms (NBFCs) and other
business organisations frequently provide these deposits. 69% of respondents
support buying gold/silver bonds. Bonds backed by the government that allow
people to invest in these precious metals without really possessing them
include gold and silver. About 68% of respondents said they were interested in
investing in real estate. Real estate investing may be a substantial and
financially rewarding venture. GPF/PPF/EPF (58.8%), the currency market
(53.8%), and mutual funds (52.5%) are further investing options.

Investment Influencer

88% of respondents said they trust financial advisers to help them make
investing decisions. In India, investment advisers are extremely important in
assisting both people and businesses in making strategic and educated
investment decisions. 82% of respondents said that the television programme
Investment had an impact on them.

Investment decisions can be significantly influenced by watching television,

especially financial news channels and programmes. There are benefits and
drawbacks to using television as a source of information, so it's crucial for
investors to approach it critically and with knowledge. The investment
decisions of siblings also had an impact on 67% of respondents. An
individual's financial behaviour and investing choices can be influenced by
siblings in both direct and indirect ways. Numerous elements, such as
upbringing, shared experiences, family dynamics, and communication, might
impact these influences.

239
Average Return from Investment

Of the respondents, 29% had investment returns of between 10 and 20 percent.

According to 23% of the respondents, the investment they made over time
resulted in a return of 10%. Additionally, roughly 21% of server respondents
think their typical return on investment was between 30 and 40 percent. 8% of
respondents said they expected a return on their investments in other avenues
of more than 40%.

Investment Pattern

Their investment has shown development over the previous few years and has
shown higher results than anticipated. Investments are safer and will help
society because of how the money is spent. Heuristics were used by
respondents to make their investment decision. However, they find that their
investment is less risky than the market as a whole.

It's crucial to understand that investment behaviour is complicated and that it

can change over time. Understanding their own behavioural inclinations,
minimising biases, and creating a disciplined investing plan that is in
accordance with their financial objectives and risk tolerance are common aims
for successful investors. A financial advisor's advice can be quite helpful in
this situation.

Measuring Behavioural Bias

Factors impacting Over Confident Bias include investor believe on investing

only certain Investment avenues which they like, their confidence in
investment that help them in the investment decision, their confidence in
investment decisions to bring a high return, and confidence about their ability
to do better than others. Respondents believe that they possess Specific skills
and experience for making investments, possess complete knowledge about
various investment avenues and they are satisfied regarding past investing
decision making.

Factors influencing Availability Bias include investor prefer to invest in

stocks, evaluated by experts and sold some stock shares in a corporation

240
because they expected their market value to fall. Factors influencing
Representative bias include that the investor look at how well a company is
doing right now. Factor impacting Loss aversion bias include investor attitude
that they can sell assets that have made financial gains while holding on to
assets that are losing money, they hold stocks that have declined in value after
my purchase, with expectations for that stock to re-bounce. Investors don’t
wish to risk loss, even though they might acquire equivalent gains, they seems
more sensitive to losses than to gains in investments. Respondents prefer to
make profits or at least break even in all investments and generally adjust my
investment instruments at the time of tax calculation to get tax benefits. Regret
aversion bias is also influenced by factors include waiting after booking
profits, tendency of buying lottery tickets and regret for holding losing stocks
for so long.

Factors for Herding behaviour bias of investors include investigating choice is

influenced by corporate news (newspapers, television, and magazines), other
investor’s decisions regarding the amount of investment have an impact on
their investment decisions and they will not buy a stock about which they have
not heard.
Factors like the attitude of investors to start saving for retirement as soon as
feasible, their investments are time-based, but once they have money, they will
invest and if they get any funds from a Bonus or Tax Refund which is other
than normal income, they will invest it impact the Impulsive Investment bias.
Hindsight bias in influenced by the attitude of investors that they are not sure
when they should have entered and exit from the market at right time.

Factors impacting Anchoring Bias include behaviour like their investment

generally depend on previous market experience, generally acquire stocks that
have dropped significantly from their prior all-time high closing price,
previously achieved a 12% return on investment, made an investment that
yielded an 8% return; now, want to invest in a strategy that yields a 10%
return and not interested in an investment route that would provide a 10%
return. Factors like experience when Investors Sometimes have two
conflicting beliefs or ideas about investment at the same time which creates

241
 mental stress and when investor invested by assuming with 25% return but
didn’t get the assumed return whereas a 25% return is being received on other
investment avenues influence Cognitive Dissonance bias.

Impact of Demographic on Investment Bias

From analysis it can be conclude that for the majority of bias dimensions
identified in the present study, there is no impact of Age on behavioural
Biasness. It can be conclude that for the majority of bias dimensions identified
in the present study, there is no impact of gender on Biasness. There is no
relationship between qualification and prejudice for the vast majority of bias
dimensions found in the current study. This analysis confirms the absence of a
significant difference in investment bias across different qualification groups.

It is discovered that all respondents exhibit comparable biases while making

financial judgements. The ANOVA revealed that there was a non-statistically
significant variation in the majority of investment bias scores across
categories. The majority of bias dimensions identified in the present study,
there is no impact of Income on behavioural Biasness. The biasnesses towards
investment decisions are found to be similar across different income groups. It
can be conclude that for the majority of bias dimensions identified in the
present study, there is no impact of Investment on behavioural. The biasness
towards investment decisions is found to be similar across joint and nuclear
family structure.

5.2 Suggestions

Investment Avenues

Investing in equity shares can be a rewarding way to build wealth over time,
but it requires careful research, discipline, and a long-term perspective.

Before investing in company deposits, it's advisable to consult with a financial

advisor to assess the risks and returns associated with the specific company

242
 and deposit scheme. Also, consider comparing the interest rates and terms
offered by different companies to make an informed decision.

Before investing in gold and silver bonds, it's recommended to consult with a
financial advisor and carefully read the terms and conditions of the specific
bond issuance. These bonds can be a convenient and tax-efficient way to
invest in precious metals as part of a diversified investment portfolio.

Remember that real estate investment can tie up a significant amount of capital
and involve ongoing responsibilities. It's important to carefully assess risk
tolerance, financial situation, and investment horizon before diving into real
estate.

Investment Influencers

Investment advisors in India are subject to regulatory oversight by the

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). Clients should carefully
choose advisors who are qualified, transparent, and aligned with their financial
goals and values. Television can be a valuable tool for staying informed about
financial markets and investment opportunities, but it should be just one of
many resources you use to make well-informed investment decisions. Siblings
can play a role in inheritance and estate planning decisions, which may have
implications for investment choices and asset allocation within the family. It's
essential to make investment decisions that align with one's personal financial
objectives rather than solely following the lead of siblings or other family
members. 54% of surveyed respondents are influenced by Published fund
ratings and rankings.

These ratings and rankings are typically provided by financial institutions,

rating agencies, and investment research firms to assess the performance, risk,
and suitability of mutual funds, Other influencers include Friends (44.2%),
Fund advertisements (28.2%), Father/Family (25.4%).

243
Investment Return

It's important to note that these are historical averages, and individual
investment experiences can deviate significantly from these averages.
Moreover, past performance does not guarantee future results, as financial
markets are influenced by a variety of factors, including economic conditions,
geopolitical events, and changes in investor sentiment.

Additionally, the specific return on an investment can be influenced by factors

such as fees, taxes, and timing. Therefore, it's crucial for investors to carefully
consider their financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment strategy when
determining expected returns. Diversification across different asset classes and
a long-term investment horizon are common strategies for managing risk and
achieving financial goals. Consulting with a financial advisor can also provide
personalized guidance based on individual circumstances.

Strategies to mitigate Bias

Overconfidence bias

• Conduct thorough research and due diligence.

• Seek diverse perspectives and opinions.
• Maintain a well-diversified portfolio.
• Avoid frequent trading and market timing.
• Keep detailed records of past investment decisions and outcomes.
• Be open to feedback and learn from mistakes.

Availability bias

Awareness of the availability bias and its potential influence on decision-making is a

crucial step in making more rational and objective judgments and choices. To mitigate
the impact of the availability bias, individuals can employ critical thinking and
decision-making strategies:

 Seek Diverse Information: Actively seek out a wide range of information and
perspectives to avoid relying solely on readily available data.

244
  Consider Base Rates: Incorporate statistical data and base rates (the likelihood
of an event based on historical or general probabilities) into decision-making.
 Question Vivid Examples: Be cautious when making judgments based on
vivid or highly memorable examples and consider whether they are truly
representative.
 Critical Thinking: Develop critical thinking skills to assess information
objectively and recognize when cognitive biases, such as the availability bias,
may be influencing judgments.
 Slow Down Decision-Making: Taking time to deliberate and gather
comprehensive information can help counter the effects of snap judgments
influenced by the availability bias.

Representative bias

To mitigate the impact of representative bias on investment decisions, investors can

take the following steps:

 Diversify: Maintain a diversified portfolio to spread risk and avoid over-

concentration in assets that appear representative of past successes.
 Research and Analysis: Conduct thorough research and analysis of potential
investments, considering factors such as financial fundamentals, industry
dynamics, and market conditions rather than relying solely on perceived
similarities to past winners.
 Consider Base Rates: Incorporate statistical data and base rates into
investment decisions, recognizing that historical patterns may not always
repeat.
 Avoid Snap Judgments: Take time to reflect on investment choices and avoid
making impulsive decisions based on superficial resemblances or patterns.
 Seek Expert Advice: Consult with financial advisors or professionals who can
provide objective and informed guidance, helping to counteract cognitive
biases.
 Stay Informed: Continuously update your knowledge of financial markets and
investment opportunities to ensure you have a well-rounded understanding of
the current landscape.

245
Loss aversion bias

Here are some strategies to help reduce loss aversion bias:

 Awareness: The first step in addressing any cognitive bias is to be aware of it.
Recognize that loss aversion bias exists and that it can influence your
decisions.
 Rational analysis: When facing a decision, try to approach it with a rational
mindset. Consider the potential gains and losses objectively. Weigh the pros
and cons without letting the fear of loss disproportionately influence your
choice.
 Set clear goals: Define your goals and objectives before making a decision.
Having a clear sense of what you want to achieve can help you focus on the
potential gains and how they align with your goals rather than fixating on
avoiding losses.
 Take a step back: When you find yourself feeling overly loss-averse, take a
step back and give yourself some time to think. Avoid making impulsive
decisions based solely on the fear of loss. Give yourself time to cool off and
approach the decision more rationally.
 Use a decision-making framework: Consider using decision-making
frameworks like a decision matrix or a cost-benefit analysis. These tools can
help you systematically evaluate the potential outcomes of your choices and
reduce the impact of emotional biases.
 Diversify investments: If you're an investor, avoid putting all your money into
a single asset or investment. Diversifying your portfolio can help spread the
risk and reduce the fear of losing everything in a single investment.
 Seek advice: Consult with others who can provide an objective perspective on
your decisions. Trusted friends, family members, or financial advisors can
offer valuable insights and help you see beyond your loss aversion bias.
 Practice risk tolerance: Gradually expose yourself to situations where you
might experience losses. This can help desensitize you to the fear of loss over
time, making it easier to make rational decisions.
 Learn from experience: Reflect on past decisions where loss aversion bias
may have influenced you. Consider what you could have done differently and
use those lessons to inform future choices.

246
  Mindfulness and meditation: Practices like mindfulness and meditation can
help you become more aware of your emotions and reactions. They can also
aid in developing emotional resilience, making it easier to manage loss
aversion bias.

Regret aversion bias

Some Strategies to mitigate the bias are:

 Diversification and understanding risk are essential. By diversifying your
investment portfolio across different asset classes, you can spread risk and
potentially reduce the fear of regret associated with a single investment.
Additionally, educating yourself about various investment options and their
associated risks can help you make more informed decisions.
 Regret aversion bias can lead to attempts to time the market, where investors
try to buy and sell assets at the perfect moment to avoid potential losses. This
is difficult to do successfully, and it often results in missed opportunities or
increased trading costs.
Instead of trying to time the market, consider a long-term investment strategy.
Stay invested through market fluctuations and focus on your financial goals.
Regularly reviewing and rebalancing your portfolio can be more effective
than trying to predict short-term market movements.
 Regret aversion can also lead investors to follow the crowd or herd behavior.
They may invest in assets or strategies that are currently popular or widely
recommended to avoid the regret of missing out on potential gains. However,
this can lead to asset bubbles and overvaluation.
Conduct thorough research and due diligence before making investment
decisions. Avoid blindly following trends or popular opinions. Seek advice
from financial professionals or experts when needed.
 Regret-averse investors may engage in confirmation bias by seeking
information that validates their investment decisions and ignoring information
that challenges them. This can lead to poor decision-making and missed
opportunities for adjusting investments when necessary.
Cultivate a habit of seeking out diverse perspectives and staying open to new
information and analysis. Be willing to reevaluate your investment choices

247
 and adjust your portfolio as needed based on changing market conditions and
financial goals.
 To mitigate regret aversion bias, it's essential to set realistic expectations for
your investments. Understand that all investments carry some degree of risk,
and it's possible to experience losses at times. Establishing clear financial
goals and risk tolerance can help align your investment decisions with your
long-term objectives.

Herding behavior bias

Strategies to mitigate herding behavior bias:

 Independent analysis: Make an effort to conduct independent research and
analysis before making important decisions, especially in areas like
investments and major purchases.
 Set personal goals: Define your own goals and objectives rather than
following the crowd. Ensure that your choices align with your unique values
and preferences.
 Diversification: In investment decisions, diversify your portfolio to reduce the
impact of herd-driven market fluctuations. Diversification can help spread
risk.
 Awareness: Recognize when herding behavior might be influencing your
decisions and take a step back to assess whether the decision aligns with your
own judgment and objectives.
 Consult experts: Seek advice from trusted experts or professionals who can
provide unbiased guidance based on your specific circumstances.
 Stay informed: Stay informed about market trends, social developments, and
consumer choices, but make decisions based on your own analysis and goals
rather than blindly following trends.

Impulsive investment bias

Strategies to mitigate impulsive investment bias:

248
  Create an investment plan: Develop a well-defined investment plan that
outlines your financial goals, risk tolerance, and a long-term strategy. Stick to
this plan, even during periods of market volatility.
 Avoid market noise: Limit exposure to constant market news and noise, as
this can exacerbate impulsive behaviours. Focus on fundamental analysis and
your investment goals instead.
 Use stop-loss orders: Implement stop-loss orders to limit potential losses on
individual investments. This can help you avoid making rash decisions during
market downturns.
 Diversify your portfolio: Diversification can reduce the impact of impulsive
decisions on your overall portfolio. A diversified portfolio spreads risk across
different asset classes.
 Seek professional advice: Consult with a financial advisor or investment
professional who can provide guidance and help you make more informed
decisions.
 Practice patience: Develop patience as a virtue in your investment approach.
Recognize that investment success often requires a long-term perspective and
discipline.
 Review and reflect: Regularly review your investments and performance, but
do so with a focus on your long-term goals rather than short-term market
movements.

Hindsight bias

Strategies to mitigate Hindsight bias:

Mitigating hindsight bias can be challenging because it's a cognitive bias deeply
ingrained in human thinking. However, there are several strategies and techniques
you can use to reduce the impact of hindsight bias in your decision-making and
judgment:

 Awareness: The first step in mitigating any cognitive bias is to be aware of its
existence. Recognize that hindsight bias is a common cognitive error, and
understand how it can affect your thinking.

249
 Reflection: Encourage yourself and others to reflect on the information
available at the time of a decision. Try to recreate the context and information
that was available without the knowledge of the outcome. This can help you
see the decision from a more objective perspective.
 Keep a Decision Journal: Maintain a journal or log of your decisions and the
reasons behind them. Document your thought process, information available,
and your expectations about the outcome before it occurs. Reviewing this
journal later can help you see how your thinking may have been influenced by
hindsight bias.
 Consider Alternative Outcomes: When reflecting on past decisions,
deliberately consider alternative outcomes. What could have happened if
events had unfolded differently? This exercise can help you recognize that
multiple outcomes were possible, not just the one that actually occurred.
 Seek Feedback: Encourage feedback from others, especially those who were
not involved in the decision-making process. They may provide different
perspectives and insights that can help you avoid the trap of hindsight bias.
 Decision Teams: Involve multiple people in decision-making processes.
Different individuals bring diverse perspectives and may be less prone to the
same biases. Discussing decisions with a group can help counteract individual
biases.
 Scenario Planning: Use scenario planning techniques to consider multiple
potential outcomes and their associated probabilities before making a
decision. This can help you prepare for various possibilities and reduce the
tendency to believe that a single outcome was inevitable.
 Delay Judgment: Try to delay forming judgments about the quality of a
decision until you have sufficient distance from the outcome. This can allow
you to view the decision more objectively, separate from the hindsight bias.
 Objective Metrics: Establish objective criteria or metrics to evaluate the
quality of a decision before knowing the outcome. This can help you assess
decisions based on predetermined standards rather than subjective judgments
influenced by hindsight.

250
  Training and Education: Educate yourself and your team about cognitive
biases, including hindsight bias. Understanding the mechanisms behind these
biases can make you more vigilant in recognizing and mitigating them.
 Use Decision Aids: Consider using decision-making frameworks or aids that
guide you through a structured decision-making process. These tools can help
you make decisions based on facts and evidence rather than subjective
hindsight-driven assessments.

Anchoring bias

Mitigating anchoring bias is crucial for making more objective and rational decisions.
Here are some effective strategies to help reduce the impact of anchoring bias:

 Awareness: Begin by recognizing that anchoring bias exists and that it can
affect your decision-making. Being aware of this cognitive bias is the first step
in mitigating it.

 Delay Making Judgments: When presented with an anchor, resist the urge to
make quick judgments or decisions. Take some time to reflect and gather
additional information before committing to a course of action.
 Consider Multiple Anchors: Instead of fixating on a single anchor, consider
multiple reference points or sources of information. This can help you build a
more balanced perspective.
 Use Range Estimation: Instead of aiming for a specific number or outcome,
try to estimate a range of possible values. This approach encourages flexibility
and reduces the impact of a single anchor.
 Consult Experts and Peers: Seek input from others who may have a different
perspective or expertise. Consulting with experts or colleagues can provide
alternative viewpoints and help you avoid relying solely on your initial anchor.
 Question the Source: Examine the credibility and reliability of the source of
the anchor. Is the source biased or does it have a vested interest? Being critical
of the source can help you evaluate the validity of the anchor.

251
  Re-evaluate and Update: Continuously reassess your decisions and be willing
to update them as new information becomes available. Don't cling to an
anchor if it no longer aligns with the evolving situation.
 Establish Decision Criteria in Advance: Set clear decision criteria and
guidelines before encountering the anchor. Knowing your decision-making
parameters in advance can help you make more objective choices.
 Practice Self-awareness: Monitor your own thought processes and emotional
reactions when faced with anchors. Be mindful of your biases and emotions,
and try to separate them from your decision-making.
 Use Decision Support Tools: Employ decision-making frameworks,
checklists, or decision support tools that can help structure your decision-
making process and reduce the influence of anchors.
 Scenario Analysis: Conduct scenario planning, especially in complex or
uncertain situations. This involves considering multiple scenarios and their
implications, which can help you break free from a single anchor.
 Keep a Decision Journal: Maintain a record of your decisions and the thought
processes that led to them. This can help you identify patterns of anchoring
bias over time and learn from your experiences.
 Challenge Assumptions: Actively question the assumptions underlying your
decision-making, especially when those assumptions are tied to an anchor.
Seek evidence and alternative viewpoints.
 Seek Feedback: Encourage feedback from trusted advisors or colleagues on
your decisions. They can provide valuable perspectives and help you identify
potential biases.
 Educate Yourself: Learn more about cognitive biases, including anchoring
bias. Understanding how these biases work can enhance your ability to
recognize and mitigate them.

By incorporating these strategies into your decision-making process, you can reduce
the impact of anchoring bias and make more rational and well-informed choices.

Cognitive Dissonance bias

252
Mitigating cognitive dissonance bias in investment is crucial for making rational and
informed decisions.

 Diversify Your Portfolio: Diversification is a fundamental strategy for

reducing cognitive dissonance bias. By spreading your investments across
different asset classes and sectors, you can avoid becoming too emotionally
attached to a single investment. Diversification also helps manage risk and
limit the impact of underperforming assets on your overall portfolio.
 Set Clear Investment Criteria: Establish clear and objective criteria for your
investments before you make them. Define your investment goals, risk
tolerance, time horizon, and specific criteria for buying and selling assets.
Having well-defined criteria can help you make decisions based on a
predetermined strategy rather than emotional attachment.
 Regularly Review Your Portfolio: Conduct periodic reviews of your
investment portfolio, ideally on a scheduled basis (e.g., quarterly or annually).
Assess the performance of each investment against your established criteria.
If an investment no longer meets your criteria or objectives, be prepared to
sell it, even if it means realizing a loss.
 Seek Outside Opinions: Don't rely solely on your own judgments. Seek
advice from financial professionals, such as financial advisors or analysts,
who can provide an independent perspective. They can help you avoid
confirmation bias and provide objective insights.
 Use Stop Loss Orders: Implement stop loss orders for your investments.
These orders automatically sell a security when it reaches a predetermined
price, helping you limit potential losses and avoid holding onto
underperforming assets due to cognitive dissonance.
 Keep a Decision Journal: Maintain a journal where you record your
investment decisions, thought processes, and reasons for each choice.
Reviewing your journal can help you identify instances of cognitive
dissonance and learn from your past experiences.
 Scenario Analysis: Practice scenario analysis by considering various potential
outcomes and their implications before making investment decisions. This
exercise can help you prepare for different scenarios and reduce the impact of
hindsight bias.

253
  Stay Informed and Open-Minded: Continuously educate yourself about
financial markets, economic conditions, and investment strategies. Be open to
new information and be willing to adjust your views and decisions as new
facts emerge.
 Avoid Emotional Decision-Making: Be mindful of emotional reactions to
investment outcomes. Avoid making impulsive decisions based on fear or
greed. Instead, rely on your predetermined criteria and strategy.
 Accept Losses and Learn from Mistakes: Acknowledge that losses are a part
of investing. It's important to accept that not every investment will be
profitable. Learn from your mistakes and use them as opportunities for
growth and improvement.
 Stay Focused on Long-Term Goals: Maintain a long-term perspective and
remember your overarching financial goals. Short-term fluctuations and
cognitive dissonance around individual investments should not distract you
from your broader objectives.

5.3 Future Research

The biasness’s towards investment decisions are found to be similar across

different age group. Understanding these differences can help financial
professionals provide more tailored advice and interventions to address
investment biases among their clients, ultimately leading to more effective
financial planning and decision-making. This study confirms the absence of a
significant difference in investment bias between male and female
participants. These findings have important implications for financial
professionals and educators, highlighting the need to consider gender-related
factors when developing investment strategies and financial planning advice.
Further research in this area may provide additional insights into the specific
biases that impact individuals of different genders in the realm of financial
decision-making.

Further research may provide additional insights into the specific biases that
impact individuals from various qualification backgrounds in the realm of

254
financial decision-making. This investigation demonstrates that there is no
discernible variation in investing bias among various occupational groupings.
Additional study in this area may provide more light on the unique biases that
affect people with different professional backgrounds in the financial world.

Analysis confirms the absence of a significant difference in investment bias

across different income groups. These findings have important implications
for financial professionals, advisors, and educators, as they emphasize the
need to consider income-related factors when developing investment strategies
and financial planning advice. Further research in this area may provide
additional insights into the specific biases that impact individuals from various
income groups in the realm of financial decision-making. Further research in
this area on investment pattern may provide additional insights into the
specific biases that impact individuals from different investment groups in the
realm of financial decision-making.

This analysis showed the absence of a significant difference in investment bias

between individuals from nuclear and joint family structures. These findings
have important implications for financial professionals, advisors, and
educators, as they emphasize the need to consider family structure-related
factors when developing investment strategies and financial planning advice.
Further research in this area may provide additional insights into the specific
biases that impact individuals from different family structures in the realm of
financial decision-making.

255