COLOSESNSES 2:14-17
QUESTION: According to Colossians 2:14-17, was not God's Law nailed to the cross and
Do we not need to observe the Sabbath?
ANSWER: If the Law of God had been nailed to the cross, then not only
The Sabbath commandment was annulled, but so were the other nine. It is evident
that this has not happened, because in all Christian churches it is still taught
that this law must be respected. By not keeping the Sabbath, it is explained that it is the day
of
the rest that was changed to Sunday, thus admitting that the commandment remains.
On the other hand, the same apostle refers to the Law of God in all his epistles, which is
what he says.
which refutes the idea that for him it was abolished. Note that in this same epistle to the
Colossians, points out as sins to be abandoned, fornication, idolatry, blasphemy,
lying, etc., sins marked by commandments of God's Law (ch. 3:5-9). It is also convenient to
remember that the Ten Commandments are quoted throughout the New Testament directly
or
Indirectly, which signals the permanence of God's Law.
The apostle Paul's main purpose in writing the contents of chapter 2 was to refute
teachings founded on "philosophies and empty subtleties, according to the tradition of
men, in accordance with
the rudiments of the world," with "worship of angels" and the fruit of a "carnal mind" (ch.
2:8, 18).
That is, an apparent e ort by some to reconcile apostolic teachings with Judaic doctrines,
Hellenistic and pagan, but who were not according to Christ," but "in conformity with
commandments and doctrines
of men" (ch. 2:8,2
Note that after noticing the error of those doctrines presented by the false teachers
described in verse 8, the apostle presents the divine personality of Christ (vv. 9, 10) and His
work of redemption by "the power of God which raised him from the dead" (v. 12), which is
why
"To you, being dead in sins... He gave you life together with him, forgiving you all the
sins" (ver. 13).
With this background we come to verse 14, where it says: "Annulling the act of decrees
that was against us" (Versión Valera, 1960); "and canceled the certificate of the decree
signed against
us" (Torres Amat Version). Were these "acts" or "decrees against us"
the Ten Commandments of God's Law? It would be impossible to admit it for two reasons:
(1) The Ten
Commandments are not decrees "against us," but are precepts of a holy, just, and
good (Romans 7:12), whose obedience means well-being and happiness, so no
commandment
it is "against us". (2) The same apostle who recalls "the forgiveness of all sins" (v. 13)
by Christ, he twice made it clear to the Romans that where there is no law there is no sin
(Romans 4:15;
5:13) Therefore, if there are sins to be forgiven, it is because there is a law that points them
out (Romans 7:7;
3:20) We conclude then that the "record of decrees which was against us" and which was
nailed to the
the cross has to be something else, but in no way the Law of God. Otherwise, the
contradiction
of the apostle would be evident, for on the one hand he recognizes the law of God, and on
the other he annuls it.
The Greek word translated "acta" or "record" in verse 14 is "cheirographon."
Primarily it means "written contract" or "certificate of debt" resulting from some
transgression. Also "book with record of sins" used for the condemnation of the
transgressor. This is what we
It helps us to understand that what was nailed to the cross were the records of our sins that
we were able to find.
"they were against us" condemning us to death (Romans 6:23).
That was the crowning work of Christ, "the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the
world" (St. John
1:29). His work was not to take away God's Law, but sin, which is the transgression of that
law (1
John 3:4). Therefore Christ nailed to the cross the "cheriographon," or "record of our
sins, or "the certificate of our debt" of sins that "were against us, which was not our
contrary". Thus the promise was fulfilled: "I, I am the one who blot out your
transgressions..." (Isaiah 43:25).
In this way, by destroying the "cheriographon," or the evidences of our sins, Christ
He stripped "principalities and powers, he publicly exhibited them, they on the cross"
(2:15).
In fact, "the accuser of our brethren, the one who accused them before our God day and
night"
(Revelation 12:10), was defeated and his fallacy discovered. The Popular Version of the
New Testament
God comes to man, thus presenting verses 14 and 15: "God has cancelled the account that
was against him."
38
us and that condemned us for its legal requirements. He put an end to that account, nailing
it to the
cross. Christ, by dying on the cross, overcame the spiritual authorities and powers, and
humbled them
publicly, taking them as prisoners in his victorious parade."
It is made clear that what was nailed to the cross was not the Law of God but all records
of our sins, forgiven by Christ's death and thus symbolically nailed to
The cross, let's turn now to verses 16 and 17. Meals, drinks, Sabbath days or Saturdays
mentioned in verse 16 are identified by verse 17, where it says, "All of which is
a shadow of things to come; but the body is Christ's." In fact, in the whole ritual of the
temple
and Levitical priesthood, there were feasts, meals, drinks, and Sabbaths or Sabbaths that
were "shadow"
the symbols of Christ.
Passover was a day of rest celebrated with food and drink in remembrance of the
deliverance
of slavery in Egypt. Since Christ, with his sacrifice, freed us from the slavery of the
sin (Romans 6:17, 18), he became our Passover "sacrificed for us" (1 Corinthians
5:7) Thus the apostle recognizes at the Passover a shadow of Christ. The great feast of the
Purification
of the sanctuary, celebrated every year on the 10th day of the seventh month, another day
of rest or Saturday,
He was also a "shadow" of Christ fulfilled by His only sacrifice (Hebrews 9:23-26). And the
same
it could be said of other feasts or Sabbaths such as unleavened bread, Pentecost, booths,
etc. This being so, contrary to what those "hollow philosophies and subtleties" would teach
against
which Paul warned the Colossians, the Christians did not need to take into account for
their
salvation that symbolic ceremonial, since the "shadows" gave way to reality: Christ.
We could say the same about the seventh Sabbath, the Sabbath appointed by the Law
of God, for when it was established by the blessing and sanctification of the Lord (Genesis
2:1-3), even though it was
sin had not entered the world, therefore it could not have been established as a shadow of
something that had not happened. Note that the same commandment gives as the reason
for his sanctification
The creation of the world: "Remember the Sabbath day, that you may keep it holy. . . .
because in six days he made
the Lord the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all things in them, and rested on the
seventh
day..." (Exodus 20:8-11). Here it is helpful to say that the apostle Paul declares that creation
is a work
(ch. 1:15-18). Therefore, being the Creator, it was He who blessed and sanctified the
Saturday. That is why he once told the Jews that the "Son of Man is Lord even though he is
Lord."
of the Sabbath" (Mark 2:28).
The same apostle once compared the Sabbath rest to spiritual rest to the Jews
(Hebrews 3:4). But with that fact he did not annul the first reason for his sanctification, to
be a memory
of creation, for the creation of the world was not annulled, nor was its Creator. It was a way
used by the apostle to make the Jews understand that with the only physical Sabbath rest,
they could not attain spiritual rest without accepting Christ. The only one who could give us
rest
By forgiving our sins, it was Christ.
We conclude by saying that the feasts mentioned in verse 16 were a direct reference to
the symbolic feasts or "shadows" of Christ of the ritual of the temple and of the Levitical
priesthood, which
they no longer had an object. Therefore, if someone did not want to celebrate them, it was
not necessary and therefore
he was not to be judged as a transgressor.