Form Id 273749 Test Datasheets for QM E-form Template Version : V1.

0
Chainages (CH.) in Km (e.g 2.275)& Weight in Grams (gm)
EARTHWORK / SUBGRADE

APPLICABLE 1 Field Density of: Earthwork Subgrade Heavy Compaction

(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH. 2.CH 3.CH

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Layer Value
Earthwork Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
Subgrade Not less than 100 per cent
Heavy Compaction Comment:
Not less than 98 per cent
(Modified Proctor)

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 1 Field Density of: Eartwork ✔ Subgrade Heavy Compaction

(Core cutter method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________
1.74 2.CH_____
1.74 3.CH______
1.74 Date of Testing: 24/10/2024

SN Observation 1.CH._______
0.770 2.CH______
2.050 3.CH______
3.850

1 Volume of Core Cutter = V cm3 1021.000 1021.000 1021.000

2 Weight of empty Core Cutter = W gm 920.000 920.000 920.000

3 Weight of Core Cutter + Wet Soil = W1 gm 2835.000 2818.000 2820.000

4 Weight of Wet Soil = W1-W gm 1915.00 1898.000 1900.000

5 Bulk Density Yb = (W1 - W) / V gm/cm3 1.876 1.859 1.861

6 Moisture Content By RMM ✔ By Sand Bath Method

7 m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1 7.000 6.000 6.000

8 content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2

9 wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
10 Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) = (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100 7.527 6.383 6.383

11 Dry Density Yd = (100 / 100 + w) x Yb gm/cm3 1.745 1.747 1.749

12 Degree of compaction in percentage 100.287 100.402 100.517

Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: ✔ Yes No ✔ Yes No ✔ Yes No

Layer Value
Earthwork Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
Degree of compaction is as per norms
Subgrade Not less than 100 per cent
Heavy Compaction Comment:
Not less than 98 per cent SATISFACTORY
(Modified Proctor)

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

1
 SUB-BASE

APPLICABLE 2 2.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Granular Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 15 < 15 < 15
PAN
Calculate
6
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 2 2.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Granular Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
SN Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 15 < 15 < 15
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 2 2.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Granular Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
SN
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 15 < 15 < 15
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

2
 APPLICABLE 2 2.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Gravel Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

Percent of Wt. Percentage of
SN I. S. Sieve Designation Sample Percent of Wt.
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 2 2.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Gravel Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II :
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range

SN I. S. Sieve Designation
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 2 2.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Gravel Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III :
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range

SN I. S. Sieve Designation
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

3
 In Case of Ongoing Work
APPLICABLE 2 2.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material:

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1 53 mm -
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm -
5 4.75 mm -
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 2 2.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm -
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm -
5 4.75 mm -
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 2 2.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Retained(g) Permissible Range
Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm -
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm -
5 4.75 mm -
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:
If yes, "Gradation is as per norms",
if No, "Failed in "---" sieve"
Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

4
 APPLICABLE 3 Field Density of GSB Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

5
 BASE COURSE: 1st Layer WBM (GRADE-II) WBM (GRADE-III) ✔ WMM

✔ APPLICABLE 4 4.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WMM

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I : 0.770

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : 76204.000 Date of Testing: 24/10/2024 Grading Type: WMM

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 0.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 2934.000 3.85 3.85 96.15 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 26321.000 34.54 38.39 61.61 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 10951.000 14.37 52.76 47.24 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 11758.000 15.43 68.19 31.81 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 6866.000 9.01 77.20 22.80 15-30
600 micron 10089.000 13.24 90.44 9.56 08_22
75 micron 7285.000 9.56 100.00 0.00 0-5
PAN
Calculate
0.00

Click here to auto calculate Remark: Gradation is as per norms

Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: ✔ Yes No
Comment: SATISFACTORY

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 4 4.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WMM

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II: 2.050

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : 54043.000 Date of Testing: 24/10/2024 Grading Type: WMM

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 0.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 1173.000 2.17 2.17 97.83 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 16932.000 31.33 33.50 66.50 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 10122.000 18.73 52.23 47.77 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 8879.000 16.43 68.66 31.34 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 4885.000 9.04 77.70 22.30 15-30
600 micron 6474.000 11.98 89.68 10.32 08_22
75 micron 5577.000 10.32 100.00 0.00 0-5
PAN
Calculate
1.00

Click here to auto calculate Remark: Gradation is as per norms

Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: ✔ Yes No
Comment: SATISFACTORY

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 4 4.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WMM

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III: 3.850

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : 68260.000 Date of Testing: 24/10/2024 Grading Type: WMM

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 0.000 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 2246.000 3.29 3.29 96.71 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 13365.000 19.58 22.87 77.13 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 15277.000 22.38 45.25 54.75 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 13481.000 19.75 65.00 35.00 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 8000.000 11.72 76.72 23.28 15-30
600 micron 8096.000 11.86 88.58 11.42 08_22
75 micron 7795.000 11.42 100.00 0.00 0-5

Calculate
PAN 0.00
Click here to auto calculate Remark: Gradation is as per norms
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: ✔ Yes No
Comment: SATISFACTORY

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

6
 ✔ APPLICABLE 5 Field Density of WMM Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________
2.225 2.CH_____
2.225 3.CH______
2.225 Date of Testing: 24/10/2024

a) Calibration 1.CH._______
0.770 2.CH______
2.050 3.CH______
3.850

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm. 328.000 328 328

(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3. 1180.000 1180 1180

(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm. 6000.000 6000 6000

(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm. 4020.000 4020 4020

(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm. 1652.000 1652.000 1652.000

(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3 1.400 1.400 1.400
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number 1.000 2.000 3.000

(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm. 1824.000 1533.000 1682.000

(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm. 6114.000 6169.000 6100.000

(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm. 4682.000 4918.000 4758.000

(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2) 1104.000 923.000 1014.000

(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3 2.313 2.325 2.322

(vii) Moisture Content By RMM ✔ By Sand Bath Method

m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1 3.000 4.000 4.000
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100 3.093 4.167 4.167

(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100 1769.276 1471.675 1614.715

(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3 2.244 2.232 2.229

(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage 100.854 100.315 100.180

Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) ✔ Yes No ✔ Yes No ✔ Yes No

Remark: Comment:
Degree of compaction is as per norms SATISAFCTORY

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 6 Volumetric Analysis of WMM If WBM G-II, Type-A Type - B

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Volume of Box (cm3) L_____ cm B____ cm H cm Vol.______ cm3 Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of filler material (screening + binder) - V1
2 Volume of stone metal - V2
3 Volumetric Analysis (V.A) = (V1/V2)*100 %
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

7
 BASE COURSE: 2nd Layer ✔ WBM (GRADE-II) WBM (GRADE-III) WMM

APPLICABLE 7 7.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 7 7.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5

Calculate
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 7 7.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

8
 APPLICABLE 8 Field Density of WBM (GRADE-II) Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 9 Volumetric Analysis of WBM (GRADE-II) If WBM G-II, Type-A Type - B

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Volume of Box (cm3) L_____ cm B cm H_____ cm Vol. cm3 Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of filler material (screening + binder) - V1
2 Volume of stone metal - V2
3 Volumetric Analysis (V.A) = (V1/V2)*100 %
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

9
 BASE COURSE: 3rd Layer ✔ WBM (GRADE-II) WBM (GRADE-III) WMM

APPLICABLE 10 10.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5

Calculate
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 10 10.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 10 10.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

10
 APPLICABLE 11 Field Density of WBM (GRADE-II) Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 12 Volumetric Analysis of WBM (GRADE-II) If WBM G-II, Type-A Type - B

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Volume of Box (cm3) L_____ cm B____ cm H_____ cm Vol.______ cm3 Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of filler material (screening + binder) - V1
2 Volume of stone metal - V2
3 Volumetric Analysis (V.A) = (V1/V2)*100 %
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

11
 In Case of Ongoing Work
APPLICABLE 13 13.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Base

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm -
3 19 mm -
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron -
7 300 micron -
8 75 micron -
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 13 13.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Base

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm -
3 19 mm -
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron -
7 300 micron -
8 75 micron -
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 13 13.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Base

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm -
3 19 mm -
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron -
7 300 micron -
8 75 micron -
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

12
 In Case of Ongoing Work
APPLICABLE 14 14.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase-Base (FDR)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of
Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 14 14.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase-Base (FDR)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate
9
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:
If yes, "Gradation is as per norms",
if No, "Failed in "---" sieve"
Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 14 14.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase-Base (FDR)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III :
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

13
 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE: ✔ BM DBM

APPLICABLE 15 15.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I:
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Retained (g) Retained (%) BM DBM

1 26.5 mm 100 90-100

2 19 mm 90-100 71-95
3 13.2 mm 56-88 56-80
4 9.5 mm - -
5 4.75 mm 16-36 38-54
6 2.36 mm 04_19 28-42
7 1.18 mm - -
8 0.6 mm - -
9 0.3 mm 02_10 07_21
10 0.150 mm - -
11 75 micron 0-5 02_08
12 PAN
Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 15 15.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Retained (g) Retained (%) BM DBM

1 26.5 mm 100 90-100

2 19 mm 90-100 71-95
3 13.2 mm 56-88 56-80
4 9.5 mm - -
5 4.75 mm 16-36 38-54
6 2.36 mm 04_19 28-42
7 1.18 mm - -
8 0.6 mm - -
9 0.3 mm 02_10 07_21
10 0.150 mm - -
11 75 micron 0-5 02_08

Calculate
12 PAN
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

14
 APPLICABLE 15 15.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Retained (g) Retained (%) BM DBM

1 26.5 mm 100 90-100

2 19 mm 90-100 71-95
3 13.2 mm 56-88 56-80
4 9.5 mm - -
5 4.75 mm 16-36 38-54
6 2.36 mm 04_19 28-42
7 1.18 mm - -
8 0.6 mm - -
9 0.3 mm 02_10 07_21
10 0.150 mm - -
11 75 micron 0-5 02_08

Calculate
12 PAN
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 16 16.1 Field Density of : Heavy Compaction

(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Density as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If compaction > 98%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

15
 APPLICABLE 16 16.2 Field Density of : Heavy Compaction
(Core cutter method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Density as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of Core Cutter = V cm3
2 Weight of empty Core Cutter = W gm
3 Weight of Core Cutter + Wet Soil = W1 gm
4 Weight of Wet Soil = W1-W gm
5 Bulk Density Yb = (W1 - W) / V gm/cm3
6 Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If compaction > 98%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark:

Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 17 Binder Content of

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Bitumen content as per job mix (%) Date of Testing:

SN Observations (Weight in gm) 1.CH.___ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Wt. of mix taken before extraction (W1)
2 Wt. of filter paper before extraction (B)
3 Wt. of mix after extraction (W2 )
4 Wt. of filter paper after extraction (D)
5 Wt. of filler collected from extract after allowing for setting (W4)
6 Wt. of filler collected in filter paper (D-B) = W3
7 Wt. of Aggregate + filler collected after extraction = W2 + W3 + W4
8 Percentage of Bitumen (in the mix) (W1 - ( W2 + W3 + W4 ))*100 / W1
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

16
BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE: OGPC&SEAL COAT ✔ SDBC MSS SURAFACE DRESSING BC

APPLICABLE 18 18.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-I:
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Gradation Type: Select Gradation Type Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN (mm) Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 PAN
Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 18 18.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Gradation Type: Select Gradation Type Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN (mm) Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PAN
Calculate
22
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

17
 APPLICABLE 18 18.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Gradation Type: Select Gradation Type Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN (mm) Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PAN
Calculate
22
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 19 Binder Content of

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Bitumen content as per job mix (%) 4.55 Date of Testing: 24/10/2024

SN Observations (Weight in gm) 1.CH._______

0.770 2.CH______
2.050 3.CH______
3.850
1 Wt. of mix taken before extraction (W1) 570.000 600.000 560.000

2 Wt. of filter paper before extraction (B) 2.000 2.000 2.000

3 Wt. of mix after extraction (W2 ) 539.40 567.30 530.10

4 Wt. of filter paper after extraction (D) 2.9 3.2 3.10

5 Wt. of filler collected from extract after allowing for setting (W4) 0.7 1.000 0.8

6 Wt. of filler collected in filter paper (D-B) = W3 0.900 1.200 1.100

7 Wt. of Aggregate + filler collected after extraction = W2 + W3 + W4 541.000 569.500 532.000

8 Percentage of Bitumen (in the mix) (W1 - ( W2 + W3 + W4 ))*100 / W1 5.088 5.083 5.000

Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: ✔ Yes No ✔ Yes No ✔ Yes No

Remark: Comment:
binder content is as per norms SATISFACTORY

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

18
 SHOULDER : ✔ EARTHEN MURRAM GSB

APPLICABLE 20 Field Density of Shoulder EARTHEN

(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Type Value
Earthen / Murram Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
GSB Not less than 100 per cent
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 20 Field Density of Shoulder EARTHEN

(Core cutter method)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of Core Cutter = V cm3
2 Weight of empty Core Cutter = W gm
3 Weight of Core Cutter + Wet Soil = W1 gm
4 Weight of Wet Soil = W1-W gm
5 Bulk Density Yb = (W1 - W) / V gm/cm3
6 Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
7 m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
8 content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
9 wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
10 Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) = (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
11 Dry Density Yd = (100 / 100 + w) x Yb gm/cm3
12 Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Type Value
Earthen / Murram Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
GSB Not less than 100 per cent
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

19
 APPLICABLE 21 21.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Granular)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-1:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
SN
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 10 < 10 < 10
PAN
Calculate
6
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 21 21.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Granular)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 10 < 10 < 10
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 21 21.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Granular)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 10 < 10 < 10
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

20
 APPLICABLE 21 21.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Gravel)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-1:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 21 21.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Gravel)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range

SN I. S. Sieve Designation
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 21 21.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Gravel)

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

21
 NEW TECHNOLOGY TEST

APPLICABLE 22 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Test

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01
Layer Select Layer Date of Testing:

Chainage-I Chainage-II Chainage-III

SN No. of Blows Reading (mm) Reading (mm) Reading (mm)
1 0
2 3
3 6
4 9
5 12
6 15
7 18
8 21
9 24
10 27
11 30
12 33
13 36
14 39
15 42
16 45
Depth of penetration (D)
= Final reading - Initial reading
DCP = Avg. Penetration / Blow
= D / No. of Blows
Field CBR (%) = 410/(DCP^1.27)
Whetehr confirms to the prescribed Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

APPLICABLE 23 Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) Test

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Age of sample(M)
Layer Select Layer UCS as per DPR Date of Testing:

Weight of Compressive Whether confirms to the standard

Density Volume of sample
SN Chainage Sample Date of testing Load in (KN) Strength
(gm/cc) (cc)
(gm) (N/mm2) Yes No
1
2
3

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

22
 ✔ APPLICABLE 24 Rebound Hammer Test

Road Name / Package No. : Turi to Lagurahi to Primary School Chahka / JH17LWEPAL-01 Age of sample (M): 18.000
CC Pavement Type CH1Select Layer
Conventional CH2 Conventional CH3 Select Type Design Strength 38.25 MPa Date of Testing: 24/10/2024

Chainage-I Chainage-II Chainage-III Remark:

SN 0.200 0.700
Reading Reading Reading SATISFACTORY
1 34.000 36.000 Note- Readings should be taken in the center of each
2 38.000 36.000
cell of the 3X3 grid (total of 9 values)
3 36.000 34.000 Comment:
4 36.000 32.000

30 cm
5 34.000 38.000
6 35.000 36.000
7 32.000 35.000
8 32.000 34.000
9 34.000 32.000 30cm
Average of Readings 34.556 34.778 Not on Scale
Compressive Strength
36.000 37.80 Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer
(MPa)
Whether confirms to the ✔ Yes ✔ Yes Yes
prescribed limit: No No No Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

`
Interpretation of Rebound Hammer value (Avg.) to convert in Compressive Strength (Refer Angle -90 for Concrete Pavement)

23