0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views26 pages

Exploring The Impact of Eldest Daughter Syndrome o

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views26 pages

Exploring The Impact of Eldest Daughter Syndrome o

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Exploring the Impact of Eldest Daughter Syndrome on Generation Z's Educational

Achievement
Ceania Gonzales

Abstract
The trending hashtag, #EldestDaughterSyndrome, made its debut on TikTok in 2023,
connecting a worldwide community of eldest daughters who shared similar experiences growing
up. The common hardships an oldest child bears are common to psychology but was first tested
by psychoanalyst Alfred Adler in his Birth Order Theory. Later research relied on cross-sectional
data across different birth orders to determine sibling differences in academic performance,
familial relationships and childhood roles, but very few focused solely on eldest daughters. Here
we report student responses on the relatability of a select group of #EldestDaughterSyndrome
TikToks and statements from the Living Up To Parents Expectations Inventory (LPEI).
Additionally, qualitative analysis on free response questions regarding academic performance,
familial responsibilities, and self-esteem were evaluated, with responses heavily focused on
parental expectations and pressures. We show that eldest daughters tend to feel more
responsible and expected to succeed academically by striving for “higher status” careers and
majors, yet also feel responsible for the success of their younger siblings as well. The unifying
experiences and feelings amongst eldest daughters on the secondary level not only reflect
themes presented in #EldestDaughterSyndrome TikToks, but also play a role in their identities.
However, the quantitative data from the LPEI emphasized that Adlerian Birth Order may not play
a factor in Eldest Daughter Syndrome as much as cultural and ethnicity does, therefore further
research is required.

1
Introduction
#EldestDaughterSyndrome is trending on TikTok, with 59.8 million views of adolescent
girls around the world sharing their experiences of growing up. A combination of unfair
responsibilities and high expectations from parents has caused eldest daughters to speak out
about their underappreciated efforts to fulfill their parents' expectations (Hu, 2023). However,
this idea is not revolutionary. Austrian psychiatrist Alfred Adler developed his birth order theory,
which states that birth order and the number of siblings affect a child’s potential, thus possibly
correlating with both positive and negative life outcomes (Horner et al., 2012). Adler's Birth
Order Theory is where modern-day stereotypes of the eldest, middle, and youngest children
derive from. Adler’s theory suggests that first-born children are over-achievers and take on the
superior role, while later-born children often try their best to move from the path their elder
siblings took, differentiating a reputation for themselves. Studies on the distinct traits between
first- and last-born children have not only impacted personality but also their life choices.
Specifically, parentification is the most common trait among firstborns, in which a child is given
“adult responsibilities” at a young age, giving them the role of a third parent. Similar
"responsibilities" and pressures are reflected in academic achievement, as eldest children are
often labeled as the “achieving child,” with higher academic expectations placed on them.
Contrastingly, the youngest child, otherwise known as the “spoiled baby,” doesn’t have as many
expectations placed on them (Nuttall et al., 1976; Mamoona and Mussarat, 2016).
Comparatively, gender may also play a role in academic achievement. Girls are more
likely to finish college than boys and are more self-disciplined when it comes to their studies.
More specifically, first-born girls are associated with higher grades and put more academic effort
into their studies, but different results are observed among first-born boys (Barnard, 2020;
Nuttall et al., 1976; Workman, 2020). However, the causes and motivations behind eldest
children’s academic success are not as well known, and even more so are the motivations
behind eldest daughters’ drive to achieve good grades in school. Various factors such as
culture, region, family size, and economic status have been tested for correlation with academic
achievement, with all factors pointing to the same observation: first-born girls strive for higher
academic success (Mamoona and Mussarat, 2016; Nuttall et al., 1976; Raby and Pomerantz,
2016). Contrarily, first-born girls are more likely to hold onto traditional values compared to
later-born girls, as a majority are raised to follow the everyday tasks performed by their mother,
most likely because they are a girl and the oldest. Traditional household tasks and motherly
duties, such as taking care of younger siblings or making dinner, add to the parentification of
eldest daughters growing up. Between this “third parent” role that first-born daughters are born
to play and the pressures to carry out a societally functional role, first-born girls lack creativity as
the “conservators of traditional culture” (Glass, 1974). With its surge on social media, it's
imperative that "a clear similarity in experiences between eldest daughters, or at the very least,
the indication of a deeper connection, be analyzed” (Abdel-Gwad, 2023). Between balancing
this “third parent” life at home between their responsibilities in school as a student as well as

2
accounting for birth order, this leads to the following question: To what extent does Eldest
Daughter Syndrome impact academic performance? However, in the literature review to follow,
a gap was found within the current body of knowledge as it provided limited professional
resources and study on Eldest Daughter Syndrome due to its emergence from social media.
Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate if eldest daughters have shared experiences
growing up and examine if those experiences are a driving force or detrimental to their
academic performance.
Literature Review
In the literature review to follow, birth order and parentification, and the relationship these
factors have with academic achievement will be discussed. Examining the origins of Eldest
Daughter Syndrome (EDS) and its relationship to motivation is important in identifying the
personality traits and characteristics of eldest daughters that contribute to academic
performance. The characteristics of Adlerian Birth Order Theory, such as family size, sibling
separation, and gender, will be considered to identify similarities with EDS and identify the
impact that being the eldest daughter has on academic performance. Furthermore, the effects of
parentification and the “third parent” role and how this added stress impacts academic
performance will be discussed. Finally, examining how these two factors contribute to EDS and
its relationship to academic performance will identify the cognitive personality traits and
motivations behind the eldest daughters’ academic drive.
Theoretical Framework and Theories of Birth Order
In every family, sibling relationships play a major role in the development of one’s life. In
Alfred Adler’s Problems of Neurosis: A Book of Case Histories, he describes the significance of
birth order as “the psychic situation of each child is individual and differs from that of others
because of the order of their succession” (Horner et al., 2012). Different from those of Sigmund
Freud, who was known for his psychoanalytic theories, Adler developed a plethora of theories
on personality, psychotherapy, and psychological disorders. Among these is Birth Order Theory,
which explains the relationship between personality and one’s birth number among their
siblings. In his case studies, Adler divided his subjects into four major categories: oldest, middle,
youngest, and single. Between these 4 categories, Adler observed similar personality traits to
distinguish one from another. For example, Adler proposed that unlike the youngest children, the
eldest children suffered the trauma of experiencing undivided attention being taken away from
them. He called this concept “dethronement,” which causes them to eventually imitate their
parents and become “power-hungry conservatives” towards their younger siblings (Sulloway,
2002). Of course, while Adler’s observations may not be accurate for all sibling dynamics, it's
important to recognize them as foundations for the factors that may be due to birth order. A
major comparison between the eldest and youngest children showed that younger siblings’
personality traits were associated with sibling-relationship agonism, whereas older siblings’
personality traits were not. Comparatively, due to issues of power imbalance between siblings

3
due to birth order, younger siblings played a more prominent role in the negativity in sibling
relationships. Older siblings tend to have more authority in the relationship and set the tone,
whereas younger siblings follow.
When comparing academic performance to birth order, it is noted that there are many
flaws in the outcomes of such studies. This is due to the multiple factors contributing to
academic performance and family dynamics (Horner et al., 2012). Additionally, many studies
only focus on the positives in the relationship between academic performance and sibling
succession, such as post-graduate success. For example, there is a higher likelihood for eldest
children to procrastinate compared to younger siblings (Mamoona, I. L., & Mussarat, 2016).
However, studies showing a relationship are sex specific. Compared to boys, girls are more
likely to try harder in school, and unlike first-born boys, first-born girls are associated with higher
grades (Nuttall et al., 1976). Such observations lead to questions about why girls are more
motivated than boys in terms of their academic achievement. Boling answers this question by
finding a relationship between birth order and creativity. In his study, it's confirmed that the
results remain consistent with previous studies: first-born males and later-born females tested
for the greatest creativity, while later-born males and first-born females scored low in creativity.
Similarly, first-born males were observed to have more intellectual stimulation growing up,
justifying the greatness of creativity. However, first-born females receive harsher socialization
pressures compared to first-born males, hindering them from being creative. Another factor is
simply being female, bearing the consequences of being the firstborn and the product of
parental anxiety (Boling et al., 1993). These factors hindering creativity in first-born females can
be linked to the responsibilities an eldest child has over its siblings. Similarly, such
responsibilities go back to Adler’s observation that eldest children often imitate their parents to
become “power-hungry.” This hinderance on creativity can be compared to academic
achievement amongst first-born females in finding the effects first-born responsibilities have on
academic performance. Similarly, such hinderance can also be a product of familial
responsibilities due to the parentified role eldest daughters may take from a young age.
Parenting Styles and Parentification
Parentification is a type of role reversal in which a child either parents the parents or
performs parental tasks in place of the parent (Mayseless et al., 2004). In some cases, the child
takes on a “third parent” role that can be done instrumentally or emotionally (Felton, 2022). In
instrumental cases, the child takes on a physical role in parenting, such as taking care of their
younger siblings or being frequently tasked with household chores that are unsuitable for their
age. In emotional cases, the child takes on an emotional role where they are held responsible
for their parents’ emotional burdens that may be inappropriate for their age. For instance, “the
child is called upon to care for the parent as a way of balancing unresolved issues that were not
settled in the parent’s own family of origin,” and the parent may fail to give the child enough
support because they are in need of protection and reassurance themselves, which will lead the

4
child to adopt a caregiving stance toward the parent because of this closeness (Mayseless et
al., 2004). In both cases, the child is forced to be held accountable for their actions or duties that
are beyond their role as a child, ultimately causing them to fall into this “third parent” cycle.
Diana Baumrind, a clinical and developmental psychologist, is best known for her research on
parenting styles and their effect on childhood development. Baumrind found three main models
of parenting: authoritarian, permissive, and authoritative. The authoritarian model was
characterized as parents attempting to “shape, control, and evaluate the behavior and attitudes
of their child in accordance with an absolute set of standards” where obedience, respect for
authority, work, tradition, and the preservation of order are emphasized. On the opposite side of
the spectrum, the permissive model is where “parents are tolerant and accepting toward the
child’s impulses, use as little punishment as possible, make few demands for mature behavior,
and allow considerable self-regulation by the child” (Dornbusch et al., 1987). Another term for
the permissive parent is "negligent,” as many children who are raised by permissive parenting
often turn out immature and lack independence. In the middle of the two is the authoritative
model, in which the parent “attempts to direct the child’s activities in a rational, issue-oriented
manner” and has “an expectation of mature behavior from the child and a clear setting of
standards by the parents; encouragement of the child’s independence and individuality; and
open communication between parents and children” (Baumrind, 1966; Dornbusch et al., 1987).
Children raised by authoritative parents often succeed more as they’ve developed a close but
healthy relationship with their parents. They learned to become socially responsible and were
high in social and cognitive competence (Baumrind, 1966; Baumrind, 2005).
Parent-child relationships can also play a role in a child’s emotional intelligence, the
ability to perceive, understand, manage, and use emotions, as “children gain awareness of their
own and also others’ emotions and succeed in expressing and managing their own emotions”
(Esra and Ibrahim, 2021). This relationship between parent and child can fall under an
authoritative parenting model, fostering positive emotional wellbeing in a child that may set them
up for a successful future. These parenting models can also tie in with Bowen’s Family Theory,
in which all families have their own system or order, which affects the social development of a
child as it “considers communication and interaction patterns, separateness and connectedness,
loyalty and independence, and adaption to stress in the context of the whole as opposed to the
individual in isolation” (Christian, 2006). This explains why some families behave differently than
others according to their dynamic or generational way of living. However, parentification is not
subjective to one singular parenting style and can become at fault with any of the three. Role
reversal within a family may be dependent upon the characteristics of a child. For instance, “girls
may be more likely than boys to do so, as females are expected to nurture and maintain
relationships” (Mayseless et al., 2004). Similarly, this expectation may contribute to the
developing personality of girls as they enter adolescence. As girls approach adolescence past
menarche, the stage in which a girl has her first menstrual cycle, “feelings of insecurity and of
inferiority and anxiety are at their peak. All demands are received as burdensome and hinder
their productiveness with resultant irritation, negativism, and frequent friction with people” (Frank

5
et al., 1951). Eldest daughters, specifically, have these feelings heightened as they are placed
with responsibilities categorized under “third parent,” which can hinder their performance outside
of the home. As eldest daughters are most likely to fall victim to parentification, the effects of this
role reversal can be seen in the academic setting to see if such burdens affect academic
achievement.
Eldest Daughter Syndrome and Academic Achievement
Among the hundreds of thousands of TikToks captioned with #EldestDaughterSyndrome,
academic achievement is a topic brought up in many videos. The effects of academic
achievement can tie back to Alfred Adler’s Birth Order Theory, which suggests the superiority
complex of first-born children as over-achievers. Going back to Nuttall’s study, first-born girls,
who are more associated with higher grades, can most likely relate to such TikToks. An example
of both ideas is reflected in various TikToks, a popular video with the title, “Seeing the academic
validation 4.0 daughter go to college and get her first ever B in a class that she doesn’t even
need and dissociate for a week (cannot intervene, cannon event)” (theanorcross, 2023). Similar
anecdotal videos attempt to fight off eldest daughter stereotypes, as seen in a video by abbizzl,
which says, “The perfect oldest daughter that goes to school as a first gen, works hard, and
helps everyone with things she never got help with so others don't have to stress as much as
she did. She's the family's biggest resource.” (abbizzl, 2023). Among many of the videos under
#EldestDaughterSyndrome, academic validation and achievement are common themes. This
differs from older studies, such as Kenneth Kammeyer's 1996 study, which was performed on
college women. Kammeyer observed that the relationship between birth order and the feminine
sex role or stereotypes impacted a woman’s college education. He found that more of the
first-born girls had a traditional orientation toward the feminine role and traditional beliefs about
female personality traits; they described themselves more often as religious and were more
likely to agree that they might marry before graduating from college” (Kammeyer, 1996).
However, he also found that first-born daughters were more likely to finish college than younger
daughters. He observed that the first-born girls' drive towards a college education was not
negatively impacted by the traditional roles they also seemed to value. If anything, a college
education is known to liberalize one's view, thus showing no effect on academic performance.
Sequentially, after a professional education, it is common for the eldest daughters to
strive for an affluent career. A variety of videos mention career choices among the eldest
daughters, many falling under healthcare, law, politics, or any “helping” profession such as
teaching or counseling. In a Dutch study correlating birth order and political leadership, it was
revealed that “female politicians also show the overrepresentation of singletons and the
underrepresentation of middle-born children that is a characteristic of the parental impact
perspective” (Andeweg and Van Den Berg, 2003). While there was no direct relationship
between the overrepresentation of the oldest children in politics, the number was significant
enough to question the parental impact on children that may lead them towards politics.

6
Andeweg and Van Den Berg found that parents were more likely to guide first-born children into
a higher-level education, pushing them for academic success and an overall more prosperous
career compared to later-born children. This idea can be applied to the underlying academic
pressures of eldest daughters, as reflected by the prompts on various TikToks. For instance, a
TikTok created by a dental student posted a video titled, “Every family needs that eldest
daughter that’s trying to become a doctor, seeks academic validation, and has an overbearing
sense of responsibility” (Sahami, 2023). While these tendencies are seen in the workforce,
trends in eldest sibling competition date back to the 17th century, a time when social status and
wealth were usually won by the eldest child (Nitsch et al., 2013). However, the underlying feeling
of competition and academic pressures in eldest daughters has yet to show a relationship to
birth order or to being impacted by familial responsibilities as seen because of parentification.
With the growing popularity of #EldestDaughterSyndrome on social media, it is expected that,
as the targeted audience for such content, the eldest daughters taking the survey explained in
the methodology section will relate in a similar way. By understanding this relationship, the
motivations towards academic achievement in eldest daughters can be identified and observed
to determine if Eldest Daughter Syndrome affects performance.
Methodology
To answer the research question presented in this study, a mixed-methods,
non-experimental, cross-sectional study was implemented to observe the effects EDS may have
on academic performance. An online questionnaire-based survey was used to determine
academic aspirations, birth order, family relationships, awareness and relatability of EDS posts
on social media, parental expectations, and satisfaction with academic performance (Appendix
A).
Participants
The survey was advertised to secondary school and college students through the online
platform ‘Schoology’ and social media, including Instagram and Snapchat; all participants
provided online informed consent prior to data collection, and all data was deidentified to protect
respondent identities. In addition, five STEM, two English, and two World Language teachers
volunteered to provide links to the survey on their course pages. This resulted in a sample size
of N = 204 individuals who took the survey, and through inspection of 134 female respondents
who were relatively young (M = 16.44, SD = 1.051) and whose average grade level was 11th
grade (SD = 0.925), complete data was provided. For the purposes of this study, only data
collected from female respondents was observed.
Procedure
The Living Up to Parents Expectations Inventory (LPEI) (Wang and Heppner, 2002) was
used to measure participants parental expectations regarding personal maturity and academic
achievement. For the purposes of the study, the section regarding “Dating Concerns” on the

7
LPEI was omitted. The scale consists of 25 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 =
strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree). To measure personal maturity, phrases regarding
household responsibilities and familial expectations (e.g., “Parents expect me to respect my
older siblings and cousins and to take care of my younger siblings and cousins"), while
academic achievement-phrased items (e.g., “Parents expect me to pursue their ideal careers
(doctors, teachers, etc.)”) are posed neutrally (Appendix B).
Pictorial stimuli relating to EDS were obtained from TikTok under related hashtags (i.e.,
#eldestdaughtersyndrome, #eldestdaughteracademics, #eldestdaughter). Relatability to the
posts was also measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly relate to 5 = doesn’t relate to
me at all) (example in Figure 1). These questions were analyzed quantitatively, as the numerical
ratings correlated to individual opinions and feelings towards the phrases and posts.

Figure 1. TikTok #4 on survey


Additionally, similar interview questions used on school “smart girls” (Raby and
Pomerantz, 2016) were used to collect participants’ satisfaction with their academic
achievement thus far. The first question regarded whether participants felt under-appreciated for
their efforts or accomplishments and the second was related to sibling success and if
participants felt responsible for it. The third question asked if participants felt their academic
performance was impacted by their home life, while the fourth question directly regarded their

8
satisfaction with their academic achievement. These questions were posed last, were optional
for participants, and were measured qualitatively.
A cross-sectional study of secondary and college students may explain or compare the
factors of EDS among different age groups and determine if such factors change or remain
similar with age. Thus, by collecting quantitative and qualitative data from the survey, the prior
research question, if Eldest Daughter Syndrome affects academic achievement, may be
answered.
Results
The collected data was converted into numerical values, then ran through the statistical
analysis program JASP, Jeffery’s Amazing Statistical Program, and produced each variable's
Spearman’s Rho p value with the variable it was compared to. Spearman’s rank-order
correlations were conducted to determine if there were significant relationships between
variables. The Spearman's rank-order correlation is the nonparametric version of the Pearson
product-moment correlation. Spearman's correlation coefficient, p, measures the strength and
direction of association between two ranked variables. Once the data was separated between
male and female respondents, the frequencies among the eldest daughters and ethnicities can
be seen in the following table (Table 1).
Table 1. Frequencies of responses to the survey measuring birth order and ethnicity (n = 134)

Variable N %

Birth Order

1” Eldest 52 39

Other 82 61

Ethnicity

American Indian or Alaskan 2 1

Asian 12 9

Black or African American 9 7

Hispanic or Latino 50 37

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0

9
White 61 46

The role of ethnicities in this study and their significance will be further discussed in the
paper's discussion section.
After careful analysis, data points with significant values related to birth order were
extracted and placed into the graph shown below (Table 2). The LPEI statements correlated to
birth order can be seen under the table listed as Statement 1 and Statement 2; the full list of
LPEI statements used in the survey can be viewed in Appendix B.
Table 2. Spearman’s rank order correlations between birth order, personal maturity, and
academic achievement (n = 134).

Variables Spearman’s rho p-value

Statement 1. “Parents 0.20* 0.05


expect me to talk and to
behave cautiously when
away from home”

Statement 2. “Parents 0.22* 0.03


expect my academic
performance to make them
proud”

* = p < .05

In general, the negative correlations for both statements suggest that females with a lower birth
order (ex., “1” being the eldest) are more likely to have such expectations. Out of the 26
statements in the LPEI, these were the only statements with significant differences. However,
when correlated with ethnicity, the number of significantly different LPEI statements drastically
increased. The Spearman’s rank-order correlations between ethnicity and LPEI statements can
be seen in the table below (Table 3).
Table 3. Spearman’s rank order correlations between ethnicity, personal maturity, and academic
achievement (n = 134)

Ethnicity and LPEI Statements Spearman’s rho p-value

10
1. Parents expect me to control/change my bad 0.20* 0.02
emper
2. Parents expect me not to make trouble for the 0.20* 0.02
amily
3. Parents expect me to respect my older 0.23** 0.007
siblings/cousins and to take care of my younger
siblings/cousins

4. Parents expect me to spend money wisely 0.21* 0.01

5. Parents expect me to take care of my physical 0.20* 0.03


health
6. Parents expect me not to waste money on 0.21* 0.02
unnecessary things

7. Parents expect me to study hard to get a 0.33*** < 0.001


high-paying job in the future

8. Parents expect me to honor my parents and 0.27** 0.002


amily’s ancestors

9. Parents expect me to study at their ideal 0.21* 0.02


college/university

10. Parents expect me to pursue their ideal careers 0.25** 0.004


doctors, teachers...)

11. Parents expect me to share the financial burden 0.18* 0.04


of the family

12. Parents expect me to study their ideal 0.28*** < 0.001


program/major
* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001

11
As seen in the table above, each of the LPEI statements was negatively correlated with
ethnicity (American Indian Alaska Native = 1, Asian = 2, Black or African American = 3, Hispanic
or Latino = 4, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander = 5, White = 6). The negative
correlations suggest that differences in parental expectations may be due to culture within
families. Additionally, since there were no significant differences between birth order and
EDS-related TikToks, ethnicity was correlated to determine if there were similar findings as when
correlated with the LPEI (Table 4). The TikToks associated with the Spearman’s Rho numbers
are shown below the chart (Figures 2, 3, and 4).
Table 4. Spearman’s rank order correlations between ethnicity and EDS-related TikToks (n =
134).

Variables Spearman’s Rho p-value

1. Ethnicity and TikTok #1 0.25** 0.004

2. Ethnicity and TikTok #2 0.30*** < 0.01

3. Ethnicity and TikTok #3 0.16 0.07

4. Ethnicity and TikTok #4 0.26** 0.003

* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001

Figure 2. TikTok #1 on survey (khansaneira, 2023)

12
Figure 3. TikTok #2 on survey (abbizzl, 2023)

Figure 4. TikTok #3 on survey (brittneetalley6, 2023)


Like Spearman’s rank-order correlation between the various LPEI statements, there is a
negative correlation between ethnicity and the four TikToks. Thus, it may be suggested that
lower-ranked ethnicities (such as American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African
American) may relate more to the posts.
The open-ended questions point towards similar themes seen in the surveyed
EDS-related TikToks. For example, in Figure 1, TikTok #4 emphasizes the stereotype of eldest
daughters pursuing a career in medicine with similar high-paying jobs implied, such as lawyers,

13
scientists, etc. Out of the 134 respondents, over half reported (55%) they are pursuing or
planning to pursue a career in STEM with majors including, but not limited to, biology (11%),
pre-medical/pre-health studies (18%), psychology (7%) and engineering (7%).
Lastly, qualitative data for the final four open-ended questions ultimately came down to
“yes” or “no.” Only answers responded by those who also reported their birth order as "1,”
therefore identifying as an eldest daughter, were recorded in the data below. The frequencies for
each open-ended question can be seen in the table below (Table 5). Those who had
“sometimes” or “not really” in their answer were categorized as “other.”
Table 5. Frequencies of responses to the survey measuring birth order and initial responses to
open-ended questions (n = 48)

Variable N %

Have you ever felt under-appreciated for any of


your accomplishments in your family?

Yes 28 58

No 11 22

Other 10 20

Do you feel responsible for your sibling(s)'s success?

Yes 20 42

No 15 31

Other 13 27

Do you believe your academic performance is


impacted by your home life?

Yes 29 60

No 8 17

Other 11 23

14
Are you satisfied with your current academic
performance? Why or why not?

Yes 24 50

No 18 37

Other 6 13

As seen on the table, for each of the open-ended responses, over half of the respondents
answered with “yes.” For many of the responses, most expressed similar concerns found in
various #EldestDaughterSyndrome TikToks. When asked if they’ve ever felt underappreciated
for any of their accomplishments in their family, many responses used the phrase “expected of”
or the word “expectation” in their answers. Overall, more than half (58%) of the respondents felt
they were underappreciated; for instance, one student felt very strongly, answering “yes.”
Yes, growing up, it was never my achievements that made me who I am. More so, it was
my obligation to do my best.
On the other hand, one student was hesitant about what to say, as she felt both ways,
acknowledging her parents' good intentions but still feeling the hurt that comes with the lack of
validation.
Yes and no. My parents celebrate all my accomplishments but often tell me or ask if there
is more that I could have done. I understand that this is to encourage me to continue
achieving my goals, but it also makes me feel like my accomplishments are not enough.
As a collective, the answers reported in the open-ended questions reflect similar ideas
displayed in the EDS-related TikToks. The relevance and significance of these findings and their
implications will be further discussed in the discussion section to follow.
Discussion and Conclusion
The effect of EDS on adolescent academic achievement seems to be of great importance
because it affects how eldest daughters perceive themselves academically and the frequencies
of concerns expressed in the qualitative data. Collectively, the eldest daughters answering the
survey felt they were underappreciated for their accomplishments, responsible for their
sibling(s)’s success, believed their academic performance was impacted by their homelife, yet
were satisfied with their current academic performance (Table 5). Since there is a high
frequency of concerns among 3 of the 4 questions, the evidence supports the assertion made in
many sources in the literature review that eldest daughters feel more pressure to strive more in
academics and feel parental expectations as a result (Barnard, 2020; Nuttall et al., 1976;

15
Workman, 2020). While only two statements in the LPEI showed a significant negative
correlation to birth order, various statements in the LPEI had strong negative correlations with
ethnicity. Between these two variables, the evidence supports the notion that personalities
associated with birth order may be under the branch pseudo-psychology, in which recently
psychologists worldwide are rejecting Adler’s Birth Order Theory (Vaghchipawala, 2023). Thus,
while qualitatively the pressures and effects of EDS can be supported in influencing academic
achievement, the cultural and familial role on academic performance may be further studied as
a factor for EDS.
Limitations and Future Directions
Since the survey is open to everyone, not just identifying females or eldest daughters, the
collected data on eldest sons or youngest daughters can be used to compare to that of eldest
daughters. Limitations to this study could include the number of respondents, as one relatively
small sample of students is not representative of students nationwide or globally. A replication of
this study could include a larger sample of respondents, which would result in more
representative data. For a more specific study on the effects of EDS, a larger sample size
consisting of solely eldest daughters can be conducted as well, and the third category of the
LPEI, “Dating Concerns,” may be implemented for a full comparison to the original study the
LPEI was conducted in (Wang and Heppner, 2002). Future research on the holistic
psychological, mental, social, and emotional effects of EDS, such as further analyzing parenting
styles and sibling relationships, rather than the effect EDS has on academic achievement, is
needed to determine the impact of the positive and negative consequences of the familial
factors of Eldest Daughter Syndrome.

16
Works Cited
[1] abbizzl. (2023, July 24). The perfect oldest daughter that goes to school as a first gen,
works hard, and helps everyone with things she never got help with so others don't
have to stress as much as she did. She's the family's biggest resource. [Video]. Tik
Tok. https://www.tiktok.com/@abbizzl/video/7259547338572614954
[2] Abdel-Gwad, F. (2023).Eldest Daughter or Third Parent? An Exploration of Eldest
Daughters in the Egyptian-American Diaspora [Master's Thesis, the American
University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain.
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2049
[3] Andeweg, R. B., & Van Den Berg, S. B. (2003). Linking birth order to political
leadership: The impact of parents or sibling interaction? Political Psychology,
24(3), 605-623.
[4] Asici Esra, & Sari Halil Ibrahim. (Dec 2021). A proposed model to explain happiness in
college students: The roles of perceived parenting styles, emotional self-efficacy,
and Forgiveness. Journal of Adult Development, 28(4), 332-345.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09378-0
[5] Barnard, C. (2020, November 25). The Striking Achievement Disparities Between
Boys and Girls in the Education System. Reason Foundation.
https://reason.org/commentary/the-striking-achievement-disparities-between-boys-
and-girls-in-the-education-system/
[6] Barnard, C. (2020, November 25). The Striking Achievement Disparities Between
Boys and Girls in the Education System. Reason Foundation.
https://reason.org/commentary/the-striking-achievement-disparities-between-boys-
and-girls-in-the-education-system/
[7] Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child
Development, 37(4), 887-907. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126611
[8] Baumrind, D. (Jul 2005 - Sep 2005). Patterns of parental authority and adolescent
autonomy. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (108), 61-69.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.128
[9] Boling, S. E., Boling, J. L., & Eisenman, R. (1993). Creativity and birth order/sex
differences in children. Education, 114(2), 224+.
[10] Christian, L. G. (2006). Understanding families: Applying family systems theory to
early childhood practice. YC Young Children, 61(1), 12-20.
[11] Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J.
(1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child
Development, 58(5), 1244-1257. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130618
[12] Felton, A. (2022, October 10). What is parentification? (P. Sanchev, Ed.). WebMD.
Retrieved November 26, 2023, from
https://www.webmd.com/parenting/what-is-parentification

17
[13] Frank, L. K., Harrison, R., Hellersberg, E., MacHover, K., & Steiner, M. (1951).
Personality development in adolescent girls. Monographs of the Society for
Research in Child Development, 16(1), 1-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165506
[14] Glass, D. C., Neulinger, J., & Brim, O. G. (1974). Birth order, verbal intelligence, and
educational aspiration. Child Development, 45(3), 807-811.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1127851
[15] Horner, P., Andrade, F., Delva, J., Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Castillo, M. (2012). The
Relationship of Birth Order and Gender with Academic Standing and Substance
Use Among Youth in Latin America. Journal of individual psychology (1998), 68(1),
19–37.
[16] Hu, Y. (2023, April 6). What is 'eldest daughter syndrome' and how can we fix it? The
Conversation.
https://theconversation.com/what-is-eldest-daughter-syndrome-and-how-can-we-fi
x-it-202016
[17] Kammeyer, K. (1966). Birth order and the feminine sex role among college women.
American Sociological Review, 31(4), 508-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090774
[18] Mamoona, I. L., & Mussarat, J. K. (2016). SELF-COMPASSION AND
PROCRASTINATION AMONG FIRST BORN AND LAST BORN UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS. Pakistan Journal of Psychology, 47(2)
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/self-compassion-procrastination-amo
ng-first-born/docview/2026411040/se-2
[19] Mayseless, O., Bartholomew, K., Henderson, A., & Trinke, S. (2004). "I Was More
Her Mom than She Was Mine:" Role Reversal in a Community Sample. Family
Relations, 53(1), 78-86. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3700240
[20] Nitsch, A., Faurie, C., & Lummaa, V. (2013). Are elder siblings helpers or
competitors? Antagonistic fitness effects of sibling interactions in humans.
Proceedings of the Royal Society, 280(1750), 1-9.
http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2313
[21] Nuttall, E. V., Nuttall, R. L., Polit, D., & Hunter, J. B. (1976). The effects of family size,
birth order, sibling separation and crowding on the academic achievement of boys
and girls. American Educational Research Journal, 13(3), 217-223.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1162433
[22] Raby, R., & Pomerantz, S. (2016). Landscapes of academic success:. In C. Mitchell
& C. Rentschler (Authors), Girlhood and the politics of place (pp. 68-84). Berghahn
Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxn16.9
[23] Raby, R., & Pomerantz, S. (2016). Landscapes of academic success:. In C. Mitchell
& C. Rentschler (Authors), Girlhood and the politics of place (pp. 68-84). Berghahn
Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt14jxn16.9
[24] Sahami, S. (2023, December 12). Every family needs that eldest daughter that's
trying to become a doctor, seeks academic validation, and has an overbearing

18
sense of responsibility. [Video]. Tik Tok.
https://www.tiktok.com/@sophiasahami/video/7308804546006895902
[25] Sulloway, Frank. (2002). Birth Order, Sibling Competition, and Human Behavior.
10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_3.
[26] theanorcross. (2023, June 13). Seeing the academic validation 4.0 daughter go to
college and get her first ever B in a class that she doesn't even need and
dissociate for a week (cannot intervene, cannon event) [Video]. Tik Tok.
https://www.tiktok.com/@theanorcross/video/7244282304909020458?q=academic
%20validation&t=1714419695854
[27] Vaghchipawala, K. P. (2023, October). A Comparative Study of Birth- Order and
Personality. The International Journal of Indian Psychology. Retrieved March 24,
2024, from https://ijip.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/18.01.030.20231104.pdf
[28] Wang, L.-F., & Heppner, P. P. (2002). Assessing the Impact of Parental Expectations
and Psychological Distress on Taiwanese College Students. The Counseling
Psychologist, 30(4), 582-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/00100002030004006
[29] Workman, J., Heyder, A. Gender achievement gaps: the role of social costs to trying
hard in high school. Soc Psychol Educ 23, 1407–1427 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09588-6

19
APPENDIX
A. Online Survey
I would like to thank you for your participation in this survey. This survey investigates if eldest
daughters have shared experiences of growing up and examines if those experiences are a
driving force or detrimental towards their academic performance.
Confidentiality: Your interview responses, along with the responses of other interviewees, will
be used to help me complete a research study that examines the social media trend, Eldest
Daughter Syndrome, through a psychological lens. All responses are confidential and
unidentified and no information directly associating your name with your responses will be
reported to anyone. Typically, findings are reported in group form, so no individual is identifiable.
Purpose: Your responses will help provide information regarding Eldest Daughter Syndrome's
impact on academic performance. Some of the questions may be repetitive to establish context
for upcoming questions or ensure consistent responses.
Gender
○ Female
○ Male
○ Prefer not to say
Age
○ 14
○ 15
○ 16
○ 17
○ 18+
Grade
○ 9th
○ 10th
○ 11th
○ 12th
○ College
Race/Ethnicity
○ American Indian or Alaska Native
○ Asian
○ Black or African American
○ Hispanic or Latino
○ Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
○ White

20
What is the highest level of education your parent(s) have completed?
○ 12th grade (or less)
○ High school graduate
○ Some college/AA degree/Technical school training
○ College graduate (BA or BS)
○ Graduate school degree: Master’s or Doctorate degree (MD, PhD, JD)
Weighted Grade Point Average
○ Below 65
○ 65-69
○ 70-79
○ 80-89
○ 90-95
○ 96-100
○ Above 100
Academic Program/Major (or intended program/major if still in high school)
Open-ended question
Do you (or used to) take any AP/IB courses?
○ Yes
○ No
If so, how many?
○ 1
○ 2
○ 3
○ 4
○ 5
○ 6
○ 7
○ 8
○ 9
○ 10+

What is your birth order? (Where do you stand out of the number of children in your family – ex.
Oldest = 1; if you are an only child, put 0)
○ 0
○ 1
○ 2

21
○ 3
○ 4
○ 5
○ 6
○ 7+
How many siblings do you have?
○ 0
○ 1
○ 2
○ 3
○ 4
○ 5
○ 6
○ 7+
Is your mother the eldest daughter?
○ Yes
○ No
○ Not sure or N/A
Is your father the eldest son?
○ Yes
○ No
○ Not sure or N/A
Have you heard of/seen the term “Eldest Daughter Syndrome” on social media before?
○ Yes
○ No
If so, on which social media platforms have you seen the term come up?
○ TikTok
○ Instagram
○ X (Twitter)
○ Snapchat
○ YouTube
○ Facebook
○ Other

How much do you relate to the following TikTok?

22
"no one warned me how lonely and hard it could be being the oldest daughter in the family.
everyone looks up to me, clings to me, expects so much from me, but who do i cling on to? who
listens to me? who do i talk to when nothing is nice anymore" (khansaneira, 2023)?
○ Strongly relate
○ Partially relate
○ Neutral
○ Partially don’t relate
○ Doesn’t relate to me at all
How much do you relate to the following TikTok?
"the perfect oldest daughter that goes to school as a first gen, works hard, and helps everyone
with things she never got help with so others don't have to stress as much as she did. She's the
family's biggest resource" (abbizzl, 2023).
○ Strongly relate
○ Partially relate
○ Neutral
○ Partially don’t relate
○ Doesn’t relate to me at all
How much do you relate to the following TikTok?
"No one tells you about how painful it is an oldest daughter to watch your siblings get the
parents you raised. It was my trauma - my pain - that made them see the error of their ways.
And I'm so happy that my sister gets kinder parents. But it's so f--- unfair and it hurts so much. I
needed my mom and dad, but I had to be both" (brittneetalley6, 2023).
○ Strongly relate
○ Partially relate
○ Neutral
○ Partially don’t relate
○ Doesn’t relate to me at all
How much do you relate to the following TikTok?
"Every family needs that eldest daughter that's trying to become a doctor, seeks academic
validation, and has an overbearing sense of responsibility."
○ Strongly relate
○ Partially relate
○ Neutral
○ Partially don’t relate
○ Doesn’t relate to me at all

23
***LPEI INSERTED HERE***

Open-Ended Questions
Have you ever felt under-appreciated for any of your accomplishments in your family?
Do you feel responsible for your sibling(s)'s success?
Do you believe your academic performance is impacted by your home life?
Are you satisfied with your current academic performance? Why or why not?

B. Living Up to Parent Expectations Inventory (LPEI)

24
Figure 5. Living Up to Parent Expectations Inventory (LPEI) Section on “Personal Maturity”

25
Figure 6. Living Up to Parent Expectations Inventory (LPEI) Section on “Academic
Achievement”

26

You might also like