0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views23 pages

Ind Eco Project File

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views23 pages

Ind Eco Project File

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

AGRICULTURAL MARKETING :

DEFECTS AND WAYOUT


A PROJECT REPORT AS PART OF CURRICULUM
OF B.Com L.L.B (Hons.)

IN THE SUBJECT OF INDIAN ECONOMY

Submitted to Submitted by
Prof. Gulshan Kumar Aayushi
Moudgil
UILS,Panjab University 187/23
Chandigarh semester 3
CONTENTS
Serial no. topic Page no.

1 Introduction 1-5

2 Objective and 6
methodology

3 Classification 7

4 Marketing channels 8-10

5 Role of state 11-15

6 Deficiencies 16-20

7 wayout 21-23

8 conclusion 24

9 Bibliography
INTRODUCTION

Overview of Agriculture in India


Agriculture has been the backbone of the Indian economy for centuries, significantly
influencing its socio-economic fabric. Historically, India’s civilization has been deeply
rooted in agrarian practices, with agriculture serving as the primary occupation for a vast
majority of the population. Currently, about 58% of the rural population is engaged in
farming activities, making it not only a primary source of livelihood but also a critical
contributor to national income. According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers'
Welfare, the agricultural sector contributes approximately 17-20% of India’s Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) (Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare, 2023). It plays a
pivotal role in ensuring food security, enhancing rural development, and maintaining
ecological balance.
India’s agricultural landscape is characterized by its diversity, which includes a wide
array of crops ranging from cereals, pulses, and oilseeds to fruits, vegetables, and cash
crops like cotton and sugarcane. This diversity is essential for both food security and the
economic stability of the farming community. Despite its importance, the sector faces
numerous challenges, including climate change, water scarcity, and fluctuating market
prices, which impact agricultural productivity and farmers' livelihoods.

Role of Agriculture in the Indian Economy


Agriculture plays a multifaceted role in the Indian economy, influencing various aspects
of national development and societal well-being. Its contributions can be categorized into
several key areas:
1. Economic contribution
Agriculture accounts for approximately 17-20% of India's Gross Domestic Product
(GDP), showcasing its significance in the overall economic framework (Economic
Survey of India, 2023). This sector not only supports economic growth but also drives
other sectors through its linkages, particularly in rural areas where agriculture stimulates
local businesses and services.

2. Employment generation
Nearly 50% of the Indian workforce is employed in agriculture, making it the largest
employment sector (NSSO, 2022). This reliance on agriculture for employment highlights
its importance in sustaining rural economies and supporting families.

3. Food security
Agriculture is crucial for ensuring food security in India. The country produces a variety
of crops, including staples like rice and wheat, which are essential for feeding the
growing population. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), India is
the second-largest producer of rice and wheat in the world (FAO, 2023). Enhancing
agricultural productivity is vital to meet the increasing food demand and to prevent
malnutrition and hunger.

4. Nutritional security
Beyond caloric intake, agriculture contributes to nutritional security by providing a
diverse range of food products, including fruits, vegetables, pulses, and dairy. The
National Nutrition Survey highlights that a diverse diet is essential for maintaining a
balanced diet and improving public health, particularly in a country where dietary
deficiencies can have widespread health implications (NIN, 2021).

5. Rural development
Agricultural growth often leads to the development of rural infrastructure, including
roads, irrigation facilities, and storage systems. The Planning Commission of India
emphasizes that improved infrastructure benefits farmers by reducing transportation costs
and enhances access to markets for various goods and services, contributing to overall
economic development (Planning Commission, 2019).

6. Poverty alleviation
By providing jobs and income, agriculture plays a significant role in alleviating rural
poverty. The World Bank reports that increased agricultural productivity can uplift entire
communities, improving living standards and reducing economic disparities (World Bank,
2022). Targeted agricultural programs can empower vulnerable groups and enhance their
socio-economic status.

7. Ancillary industries
Agriculture supports a range of agro-based industries, including food processing, textile
manufacturing, and bio-fertilizers. These industries create additional employment
opportunities and contribute to economic diversification. The Ministry of Food
Processing Industries indicates that the growth of agro-based industries can enhance the
value chain of agricultural products, increasing profitability for farmers (Ministry of Food
Processing Industries, 2023).

8. Supply chain development


The agricultural sector's growth fosters the development of supply chains and logistics
services, enhancing efficiency in the movement of goods from producers to consumers.
The National Institute of Agricultural Marketing (NIAM) notes that this includes cold
storage, transportation, and marketing services, which are vital for reducing post-harvest
losses and ensuring product quality (NIAM, 2021).

9. Export potential
India is one of the largest producers and exporters of various agricultural commodities,
such as spices, tea, and rice. Agricultural exports contribute significantly to the national
economy, improving foreign exchange reserves and enhancing trade balances. As per the
Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA),
agricultural exports accounted for approximately $41 billion in the fiscal year 2022
(APEDA, 2023).

10. Global market position


The growth of the agricultural sector strengthens India's position in global markets,
attracting investment and fostering international collaborations in research and
development. The Economic Times notes that this global engagement can enhance
technological adoption and promote sustainable agricultural practices (Economic Times,
2023).

11. Environmental sustainability


Agriculture has a crucial role in managing natural resources, including land, water, and
biodiversity. Sustainable agricultural practices can enhance soil fertility, conserve water,
and protect ecosystems, contributing to environmental sustainability. The Indian Council
of Agricultural Research (ICAR) emphasizes the importance of promoting practices such
as organic farming and agroforestry to mitigate the environmental impact of agricultural
activities (ICAR, 2023).

12. Climate resilience


With the increasing impact of climate change, agriculture can promote practices that
enhance resilience. This includes the adoption of climate-smart agriculture techniques that
reduce vulnerability and enhance productivity. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and
Climate Change indicates that building resilience in agriculture is essential for
maintaining food security and supporting farmers in adapting to changing environmental
conditions

13. Social stability


Agriculture is deeply ingrained in India's culture and traditions. It plays a vital role in
social cohesion and community bonding, with festivals and rituals often centered around
agricultural practices. The cultural importance of agriculture contributes to community
identity and strengthens social ties.

14. Rural empowerment


Empowering farmers through better access to markets, technology, and credit can lead to
more informed and resilient rural communities, promoting social stability and reducing
unrest. Programs aimed at enhancing financial literacy and market access can
significantly improve the economic situation of rural households (NABARD, 2021).

Understanding Agricultural Marketing

The word market has varied connotations. At a micro level it refers simply to a place
where commodities are bought and sold. At a more particular or specialised level, it might
refer to product markets like wheat market, cotton market, etc. or a retail or wholesale
market. At a macro level, it could refer to a country or region like Indian market, Asian
market, etc. It can also connote an organisation which provides facilities for exchange of
commodities (e.g. futures market). Functionally, in its modern context it is a
comprehensive term covering many functions. These functions may be identified as: (i)
collection of surpluses from the individual farmers; (ii) transportation to nearest
assembling centre; (iii) grading and standardisation; (iv) pooling; (v) processing; (vi)
warehousing; (vii) packing; (viii) transportation to the consuming centres; (ix) bringing
the buyers and sellers together; and (x) sale to the ultimate consumers. All these functions
require investment of capital and ability to take risks due to fluctuation in prices, losses,
deterioration in quality, etc. The arrangements made for raising the requisite finance for
the above functions bearing market risks at various levels also, therefore, form part of
marketing.
Agricultural marketing encompasses the activities involved in the buying and selling of
agricultural products, from the farm gate to the consumer. It includes various processes
such as grading, packaging, storage, transportation, and retailing. Effective agricultural
marketing is essential for enhancing farmers' income, ensuring fair prices for consumers,
and minimizing post-harvest losses. A well-functioning agricultural marketing system
helps in balancing supply and demand, reducing price volatility, and ensuring the
availability of quality products to consumers.
The marketing system for agricultural produce is often complex, involving multiple
stakeholders, including farmers, traders, wholesalers, retailers, and consumers.
Understanding the dynamics of this system is vital for identifying existing inefficiencies
and potential areas for improvement.

Major Concepts of Agricultural Marketing


1. Market structure
This refers to the organization of the agricultural market, which includes the types of
markets (such as mandis or cooperative societies) and the nature of competition within
these markets. The structure affects pricing, availability, and the overall efficiency of the
marketing process.

2. Price formation
Understanding how prices are determined in agricultural markets is crucial. Prices are
influenced by factors such as supply and demand dynamics, seasonal variations,
government policies, and global market trends. Farmers often lack the information and
bargaining power needed to obtain fair prices for their produce, which can lead to income
instability.

3. Marketing channels
These are the pathways through which agricultural products move from producers to
consumers. Marketing channels can include direct sales, wholesale markets, retail outlets,
and online platforms. Each channel has its own set of challenges and opportunities that
can impact the efficiency of agricultural marketing.

4. Regulatory framework
Government policies and regulations play a significant role in shaping agricultural
marketing. Key elements include the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC)
Act, which governs market practices, and Minimum Support Prices (MSPs), which aim to
protect farmers from price fluctuations. However, the effectiveness of these regulations
often varies, leading to the need for reforms to better support agricultural marketing.

5. Post-harvest management
This involves the handling of crops after harvest, including storage, processing, and
transportation. Inefficiencies in post-harvest management can lead to significant losses,
both in terms of quantity and quality of produce. Addressing these issues is critical for
improving farmers' incomes and ensuring food security.
By addressing these key areas within agricultural marketing, stakeholders can work
towards creating a more efficient and sustainable system that benefits farmers and
consumers alike. This report will further explore the defects in agricultural marketing and
propose potential solutions to enhance the overall effectiveness of the sector.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY AND METHODOLOGY

1 Understanding the role of agriculture in Indian Economy


2 Understanding the concept of agricultural marketing
3 Screening Classification of agriculture markets
4 Analyzing major marketing channels
5 Examining inadequacy/defects in agricultural marketing
6 Examining the role of state in removing defects of agricultural marketing
7 Suggesting measures to overcome the inadequacy/defects of agricultural
marketing

METHODOLOGY-Doctrinal research is followed. Doctrinal legal research


focuses on theoretical research, that is, library-based study.
CLASSIFICATION OF AGRICULTURAL MARKETING

The system of marketing of agricultural produce prevailing in India is a three tier system
comprising
1 primary rural market
2 secondary or assembly markets
3 wholesale or terminal markets

Primary Markets: The primary rural markets are the traditional system of markets like the
periodic markets or hats and fairs held in rural areas. Besides marketing of many consumer
goods, these institutions provide an important outlet for the disposal of surplus farm
produce. Many of the periodic markets today are within the purview of regulation with the
government charging a small fee from each participant for which the markets provide some
basic infrastructure for smooth trading. Producers having a limited quantity to sell often
find it economical to dispose off their produce in the rural market rather than go the
secondary or wholesale markets. Normally, such markets serve an area of 5 to 10 km radius.

Secondary Markets: While the primary markets cater to the local demand, the secondary
markets cater to distant demand. These markets serve as collection centres and as a place
for the assembly of produce by traders who come from distant places. They are called
‘mandis’, which are usually situated at the district head quarters near to railway stations.
Such markets have good communication facilities and draw supplies from their hinterland
spread over a radius of 10-30 kms. They are daily markets from where the produce are
transported in truckload of goods to the city markets.

Terminal Markets : These are the third tier of markets where sale of goods to retailers
takes place. In these markets the goods are finally disposed of to final consumer or
processers or assembled for shipment to foreign destinations. The area served by these
markets is very large. The terminal markets are of two types: primary wholesale markets
and secondary wholesale markets. The primary wholesale markets are larger in area and
attract many retailers as they are able to assort the products as per their requirement. They
also serve as transit points to distant small town markets. Being governed by the APMA,
the primary wholesale markets generally have the requisite infrastructure and a system for
smooth trading. They are located in important towns near production centres where the
producer-farmers bring their produce for sale. The secondary wholesale markets are located
at points nearer to resident population. Thus, in both the type of terminal markets, the
produce is either finally disposed of to the consumers or processors or is assembled for
dispatch to distant markets and also for exports.
MARKETING CHANNELS
A marketing channel is a group of people, organizations, and actions that work together
to move products from production to consumption. It includes the people, organizations,
and activities that make goods and services available to consumers for their use and
enjoyment.

The sequential activities that determine the movement of products from the point of
production to the point of consumption (i.e. end use) is referred to as the ‘marketing
channel’. It refers to the complete route followed in its movement from the source to the
destination. An important dimension of the marketing channel is its length. The length of
the marketing channel essentially relates to the number of intermediate individuals or
institutions involved in the flow of commodities from the origin to the destination. As each
participant receives a share in the total price paid by the consumer for the product in the
final stage, the efficiency of the marketing system lies in its optimum or shortest length of
the channel. Since the objective is to maximise the welfare of both the producers and
consumers, the efficiency of the marketing system or channel is indicated by: (i) the share
of producers in the prices paid by the consumers; and (ii) the difference between the
consumer and the producer prices. Clearly, both these should be maximum for the optimal
conditions to prevail for the consumers and the producers. Generally, perishable
commodities like fruits and vegetables tend to have shorter channels as compared to the
non-perishable commodities like food grains

Agricultural marketing channels refer to the pathways through which farm products move
from producers to consumers. They encompass a range of intermediaries and systems, from
small-scale local exchanges to international trade networks. These channels play a pivotal
role in ensuring that agricultural products reach consumers efficiently, while also impacting
prices, market access, and farm incomes.
1. Traditional Marketing Channels
In India, traditional marketing channels dominate agricultural distribution, involving
agents, wholesalers, and retailers. Traditionally, farmers sell their produce at mandis or
wholesale markets managed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committees (APMCs).
These markets are designed to protect farmers from exploitation and to offer a transparent
bidding process. In 2019, there were about 6,900 regulated APMC mandis in India, and
around 22,000 rural periodic markets that partially fall under regulation (Government of
India, 2019).

However, the traditional system has been criticized for its inefficiencies. Studies indicate
that farmers often receive only 20-25% of the final retail price for their products, with the
remaining portion absorbed by intermediaries and logistical costs (NABARD, 2020). This
system can increase the cost to consumers while reducing farmers' earnings.
2. Direct Marketing Channels
Direct marketing channels have gained popularity as they reduce the role of
intermediaries, allowing farmers to receive a higher share of the consumer’s rupee.
Examples include farmers’ markets, contract farming, and e-commerce platforms.
According to a report by the National Institute of Agricultural Marketing (NIAM), direct
marketing channels can increase farmers' profit margins by 30-40%, primarily by
eliminating intermediary costs (NIAM, 2021).

E-commerce platforms have become especially significant with the advent of the
government’s e-NAM (National Agriculture Market) initiative, which was launched in
2016. As of 2023, the e-NAM platform has linked over 1,000 mandis across 18 states,
enabling better price discovery and efficient trading mechanisms for over 17 million
farmers (Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers' Welfare, 2023).

3 The indirect route: The indirect route is when agricultural products are often transported
from farmers to consumers via middlemen or intermediaries. Intermediaries can range in
number from one to several. The distance between the manufacturer and the consumer has
grown both horizontally and vertically in the current period of specialized production,
which has led to a decline in direct sales. Because a significant portion of the produce passes
through them, the function of market intermediaries has grown recently.

4 Contract Farming
Contract farming allows companies to directly engage with farmers through pre-arranged
agreements. Companies provide inputs like seeds and fertilizers, while farmers commit to
selling their produce at a predetermined price. This system provides assured income to
farmers, while companies benefit from reliable supply chains. According to FICCI, around
15% of Indian farmers are now involved in some form of contract farming, which has led
to increased yields and reduced market price volatility for those participating farmers
(FICCI, 2022).

5 Cooperatives and Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)


Cooperatives and Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) are essential components of
India’s agricultural marketing channels. FPOs empower small and marginal farmers by
pooling their resources to negotiate better prices and secure inputs at lower costs. According
to the Small Farmers’ Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC), India has over 10,000 registered
FPOs, covering about 15 million farmers. Studies show that FPOs can improve farmers'
returns by 20-25% by collectively reducing transportation and marketing costs (SFAC,
2022).
6 Modern Retail Chains
Modern retail chains such as Reliance Fresh, Big Bazaar, and Walmart are emerging as
significant players in agricultural marketing channels. By bypassing traditional
intermediaries and sourcing directly from farmers, these retail giants offer farmers better
price realization. A study by McKinsey & Company indicates that modern retail chains
contribute around 10-15% higher income for participating farmers compared to traditional
marketing channels (McKinsey & Company, 2021).

7 Export Marketing Chains


Agricultural products like spices, tea, and fresh fruits are exported to international
markets through export marketing channels. These channels involve export houses,
government trade agencies, and often require compliance with international standards. For
example, India's agricultural exports reached $50 billion in 2022, largely supported by
export chains specializing in crops such as rice, spices, and tea (APEDA, 2022).

8 Public Procurement Channels


In India, public procurement channels play a significant role in ensuring food security.
Through agencies like the Food Corporation of India (FCI), the government procures
staples like wheat and rice at Minimum Support Prices (MSP) to maintain buffer stocks. In
2021-22, the FCI procured approximately 60 million metric tons of grains, which supported
millions of farmers with stable income (Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public
Distribution, 2022).

9 Cold Chain Logistics


Cold chains are essential for perishable goods such as dairy, meat, and certain vegetables
and fruits. These logistics chains incorporate cold storage and refrigerated transport to
maintain the freshness of goods over long distances. For example, India has over 8,200 cold
storage facilities, mostly catering to potato, with an increasing need for diversified storage
for fruits, vegetables, and dairy (National Centre for Cold Chain Development, 2022).

10 Agro-Processing Chains
Agro-processing chains involve the processing and packaging of raw agricultural
products before they reach the end consumer. This can range from small-scale food
processing units to large-scale factories. Agro-processing chains add value to products like
sugar, oil, and packaged foods. According to the Ministry of Food Processing Industries,
value-added food exports increased by 15% in 2022, showcasing the role of agro-
processing in adding market value (MoFPI, 2023).
ROLE OF STATE IN PROMOTING AGRICULTURAL MARKETING
Agricultural marketing is essential for ensuring that farmers receive fair returns and that
consumers have access to quality produce at reasonable prices. In India, the state plays a
significant role through institutions, legislative frameworks, and policy initiatives that
support agricultural markets. This role is pivotal in addressing the challenges of market
access, price stability, and infrastructure development, which are essential for the
sustainable growth of the agricultural sector.

Policy Initiatives

1. Regulated Market Reforms: To ensure farmers receive fair prices, the government
introduced the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) Act, establishing
a regulated framework for buying and selling produce. In recent years, amendments
have aimed at reducing monopoly power within APMCs and facilitating direct
farmer-to-consumer transactions.
2. National Agriculture Market (e-NAM): The state introduced the electronic
National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) in 2016, which integrates physical
agricultural markets across the country into a unified online market platform. This
online trading portal has increased transparency and competitiveness, helping
farmers obtain better prices by offering a broader range of buyers. As of [latest
available year], e-NAM covers over 1,000 markets and includes over 20 million
registered farmers.

Financial Assistance and Infrastructure Development

1. Market Infrastructure Development: To improve access to physical markets, the


state provides funding for building rural and wholesale markets, cold storage, and
warehousing facilities. Programs such as the Rural Infrastructure Development
Fund (RIDF) and the Agricultural Marketing Infrastructure (AMI) scheme
help in setting up essential infrastructure, reducing wastage, and enhancing the
shelf-life of perishable goods.
2. Subsidies and Credit Access: The state provides financial incentives and credit
access to help farmers engage in marketing activities, including transport subsidies
and concessional loans. Subsidies for transportation under the Kisan Rail Yojana,
for instance, reduce the burden of high logistics costs and facilitate long-distance
trade, allowing farmers to reach larger markets with minimal losses.

Price Stabilization Mechanisms

1. Minimum Support Price (MSP): The state sets MSPs for certain crops to protect
farmers from sharp price drops due to market fluctuations. MSP aims to ensure a
minimum income for farmers, especially for those growing staple crops. In recent
years, the MSP has expanded to cover more crops, encouraging diversified
agriculture and better risk management.
2. Market Intervention Scheme (MIS): MIS is another price support mechanism
used to procure perishable and horticultural produce directly from farmers at a pre-
determined price when the market falls below this threshold. This scheme helps
stabilize prices for commodities like apples, oranges, and other seasonal fruits and
vegetables.
Market Information Services and Training

1. Market Intelligence and Advisory Services: Through platforms like Agmarknet,


the state provides market-related information to farmers, including price trends,
demand forecasts, and supply details. Such services empower farmers to make
informed decisions on when and where to sell their produce, maximizing their
earnings.
2. Capacity-Building Programs: To improve farmers' marketing skills, the state
organizes training programs on post-harvest management, quality standards, and
price negotiations. These programs aim to reduce dependency on middlemen and
improve farmers' understanding of quality requirements in both domestic and export
markets.

Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)

Recognizing the need for expertise and efficiency, the state encourages public-private
partnerships in agricultural marketing. PPP models focus on supply chain management,
cold storage, and logistics, combining the strengths of public support with private sector
innovation. Successful projects include the Farm-to-Fork model and partnerships with
major retail companies, enabling better market access for small farmers.

Key Institutions Supporting Agricultural Marketing

1. Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP): CACP, under the
Ministry of Agriculture, recommends Minimum Support Prices (MSPs) to stabilize
farmers' income and safeguard them against price volatility. CACP uses cost-based
analyses to ensure that MSPs are fair and remunerative, covering crops like wheat,
rice, and pulses.
2. Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC): Established under the
APMC Acts of various states, these committees regulate agricultural markets to
protect farmers from exploitation by intermediaries. APMCs set up physical
marketplaces, or mandis, where transactions can occur in a controlled environment.
However, recent reforms encourage the liberalization of these markets to allow
farmers to sell directly to private buyers or online platforms.
3. Small Farmers’ Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC): SFAC promotes Farmer
Producer Organizations (FPOs) and provides technical and financial support to
enhance farmers’ collective bargaining power. By organizing small farmers into
groups, SFAC empowers them to participate in the market with greater control over
prices and reduces dependency on middlemen.
4. Food Corporation of India (FCI): FCI procures agricultural produce from farmers
at MSP to maintain buffer stocks and ensure food security. FCI’s procurement
efforts play a crucial role in price stabilization and are particularly essential during
periods of surplus or crop gluts.

Legislative Framework

1. Essential Commodities Act, 1955: This Act empowers the government to regulate
the production, supply, and distribution of essential commodities. Although
originally aimed at preventing hoarding and ensuring food security, recent
amendments have limited its scope, allowing greater freedom for market forces to
operate while still ensuring intervention during emergencies.

2. Model APMC Act, 2003 and Model Agricultural Produce and Livestock
Marketing Act, 2017: These model acts encourage states to implement reforms
allowing private markets and direct farmer sales. By integrating private players, the
legislation aims to reduce farmers’ reliance on traditional mandis and diversify
market options.

Policy Initiatives

1. National Agriculture Market (e-NAM): Launched in 2016, e-NAM is an online


trading portal that links APMC-regulated markets, enabling farmers to access a
broader range of buyers across the country. As of [latest year], e-NAM integrates
over 1,000 markets with around 20 million registered farmers, promoting
transparency and better price discovery.
2. Pradhan Mantri Kisan Sampada Yojana (PMKSY): This scheme supports the
development of processing units and value-added infrastructure like cold storage
and food parks. By enhancing processing facilities, PMKSY helps farmers retain
more value in their produce and reach larger, more profitable markets.

Infrastructure, Grading and Standardisation :The Ministry of Agriculture is


implementing another central sector scheme called ‘Development/Strengthening of
Agricultural Marketing Infrastructure, Grading and Standardisation’. Under the
scheme, investment subsidy of 25 percent of the capital cost of the marketing
infrastructure development project is provided subject to a maximum of Rs 50 lakh
for each project. The percentage of subsidy is higher at 33.3 percent of capital cost
(subject to a maximum of Rs 60 lakh) per project in NE states, hilly areas and to
SC/ST entrepreneurs. In respect of infrastructure projects of state-
governments/state-agencies, there is no upper ceiling on subsidy to be provided
under the scheme. The scheme is reform linked, to be implemented in those States/
UTs where the law allows for the setting up of competitive agricultural markets in
private and cooperative sectors providing for direct marketing and contract farming.
The States of Andhra Pradesh, Punjab, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Manipur, Sikkim,
Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Union
Territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Daman and Diu and Dadra and Nagar
Haveli have so far notified to receive assistance under the Scheme. The remaining
States/ UTs are in the process of amending their APMC Acts.

The state’s role in agricultural marketing is multifaceted, involving regulatory reforms,


financial support, infrastructure development, and information dissemination. While
progress is evident, continuous efforts are essential to ensure inclusive growth, as equitable
market access remains the key to rural economic empowerment. Enhanced state initiatives,
coupled with private sector involvement, will be critical in addressing these challenges and
advancing agricultural marketing in India.
INADEQUACY/DEFICIENCIES IN AGRICULTURAL
MARKETING

Agricultural marketing in India faces several critical defects that hinder its efficiency and
fairness. From inadequate infrastructure to poor price discovery mechanisms, these
challenges limit farmers' ability to secure fair returns and reduce the quality and
affordability of produce for consumers. Issues such as the dominance of intermediaries,
lack of storage facilities, limited access to timely market information, and restrictive
regulations further exacerbate the struggles of small and marginal farmers. Addressing
these defects is essential for creating a more equitable and effective agricultural marketing
system that supports both farmers and consumers.

1. Lack of Infrastructure

Inadequate Storage Facilities:


India faces a chronic shortage of storage infrastructure, especially for cold storage that is
essential for perishable items like fruits, vegetables, and dairy products. This infrastructure
gap leads to substantial post-harvest losses due to spoilage. According to the Ministry of
Agriculture, around 30-40% of fresh produce is wasted every year because it cannot be
stored properly, resulting in significant economic losses for farmers and higher prices for
consumers. The lack of cold storage also means that farmers are pressured to sell produce
immediately after harvest, often at lower prices.

Transportation Issues:
Rural transportation infrastructure in India is underdeveloped, with inadequate road
networks and limited access to reliable, cost-effective transportation options. Farmers in
remote areas struggle to transport their produce to markets, especially during peak seasons
when transportation demand increases. This results in spoilage, delayed sales, and higher
transportation costs. The limited transport options force farmers to rely on local buyers or
intermediaries, who often exploit the lack of options to offer lower prices.

Market Access Limitations:


Many farmers live far from regulated markets, known as Agricultural Produce Market
Committees (APMCs), which are set up to facilitate fair trading. According to the Ministry
of Agriculture, only about 20% of India’s villages are within a 5 km radius of an APMC
market, leaving the majority of farmers with limited market access. The distance increases
their cost of reaching markets, reducing their profit margins, and often discourages them
from selling their produce at a fair price.

2. Dominance of Intermediaries

High Commission Fees and Exploitation:


Intermediaries, such as commission agents, wholesalers, and retailers, play a significant
role in Indian agricultural markets. These intermediaries add multiple layers of costs to the
supply chain and often take a large share of the final consumer price. Farmers frequently
receive only about 25-30% of the end price, with the rest going to intermediaries who
charge fees at each stage. This significantly reduces the earnings of farmers, who are the
primary producers.

Price Manipulation and Cartels:


In many cases, intermediaries manipulate prices by colluding with each other to control
supply and demand within the markets. They can artificially lower purchase prices when
buying from farmers and raise them when selling to consumers. This creates price volatility,
leading to losses for farmers who are forced to sell at low prices due to a lack of alternative
buyers. This manipulation especially affects small farmers who lack the resources to hold
out for better prices or transport their goods to other markets.

3. Inadequate Price Discovery

Absence of Competitive Bidding:


Price discovery, which is crucial for determining fair prices based on demand and supply,
is weak in many Indian markets. In regulated markets, price discovery should ideally
happen through competitive bidding in auctions. However, due to lack of transparency and
the presence of cartels, bidding is often limited, resulting in non-competitive pricing.
Farmers are left with few options and often accept lower prices.

Limited Access to Minimum Support Prices (MSP):


Although the government sets MSPs for certain crops to safeguard farmers from price
fluctuations, only a small percentage of farmers benefit from it. Issues like distance to
procurement centers, lack of awareness, and administrative inefficiencies limit access to
MSPs. As a result, most farmers are forced to sell their produce below the MSP, especially
in regions where APMC markets are absent. For instance, in states where procurement
centers are sparse, farmers often have to travel long distances to avail of MSP, which
becomes economically unviable for small and marginal farmers.
4. Lack of Market Information

Inadequate Access to Real-Time Market Data:


Access to market information is vital for farmers to make informed decisions regarding
where, when, and at what price to sell their produce. However, many farmers rely on
intermediaries for price information, who may provide biased or incomplete information.
The lack of real-time, transparent data on prices in different markets makes it difficult for
farmers to negotiate and get fair rates.

Digital Divide and Limited Technology Adoption:


While digital platforms like the National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) aim to provide price
transparency, rural connectivity remains a significant barrier. Many farmers lack access to
smartphones, internet, or the technical skills to navigate digital platforms. According to a
2020 survey by the Ministry of Electronics and IT, only about 20% of rural households
have reliable internet access, limiting the reach and effectiveness of digital marketing
solutions.

5. Poor Regulation of Markets

Monopoly of APMC Markets:


The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) Act was introduced to protect
farmers by regulating agricultural markets. However, APMC markets in many states
function as monopolies, with only licensed traders allowed to buy from farmers. This
system restricts competition, leading to exploitation and reducing farmers' bargaining
power. Traders in APMC markets often collude, setting low prices that leave farmers with
little choice but to accept.

Bureaucratic Red Tape:


The APMC system also faces criticism for its cumbersome licensing processes, complex
fees, and regulations, which create barriers to entry for new and private players. This
discourages private investment and innovation in agricultural marketing. The result is an
uncompetitive environment that limits farmers' choices and stifles market growth.

6. Insufficient Financing and Credit Support


Dependence on Informal Credit Sources:
A significant portion of India’s small and marginal farmers lack access to institutional credit
from banks and rely instead on local moneylenders who charge high-interest rates. Studies
show that around 40% of rural households depend on informal credit sources. This
dependence often leads to a debt trap, where farmers are forced to repay loans at exorbitant
rates, reducing their net earnings from agricultural activities.

Delayed Payments from Buyers:


Even when farmers sell their produce in APMC markets, payments are not always made
immediately. Delays in payment processing create financial strain for farmers who need
cash flow for their next crop cycle or household needs. This issue further discourages
farmers from using formal markets and forces them to sell to local buyers at lower prices
to get immediate payment.

7. Limited Access to Modern Technology

Low Levels of Mechanization:


Mechanization in Indian agriculture remains low, especially among small farmers who
cannot afford modern equipment. This reliance on manual labor leads to inefficiencies in
both production and harvesting. Lack of mechanization reduces yield potential and limits
the quality of produce, which affects its marketability and price.

Lack of Post-Harvest Technology:


Post-harvest technology is critical for preserving and enhancing the quality of agricultural
produce before it reaches the market. Many farmers, however, lack access to such
technologies, including sorting, grading, and packaging. This results in lower quality
products, which fetch lower prices in the market. Without access to these technologies,
farmers cannot compete with products that are of higher quality due to better handling and
process.

WAYOUT TO OVERCOME DEFECTS IN AGRICULTURAL


MARKETING

1. Strengthen Market Infrastructure

 Expand and Modernize Storage Facilities: Increase the number of rural


warehouses and cold storage units to reduce post-harvest losses, particularly for
perishable goods. This would ensure that farmers can store their produce longer and
wait for favorable market prices.
 Develop More Collection and Distribution Centers: Establish collection centers
closer to farming areas to streamline the movement of produce from farms to
markets, reducing transit time and cost.

2. Promote Digital Platforms for Market Access

 Expand e-NAM Integration: Extend e-NAM (National Agriculture Market) to


include more small and remote markets, and encourage states to interlink more
APMCs with the digital platform. This would increase transparency and access to a
larger buyer base for farmers.
 Simplify Digital Access: Make digital platforms mobile-friendly and provide local-
language options to help farmers from various regions use these tools with ease.

3. Enhance Regulatory Reforms

 Standardize Agricultural Marketing Laws Across States: Encourage uniform


adoption of model agricultural laws, such as the Model APMC Act, across states to
create a cohesive and liberalized market environment. This would help in reducing
state-level discrepancies and monopolies.
 Support Direct Marketing: Promote models where farmers can sell directly to
consumers, retailers, and processors. Encouraging Farmer Producer Organizations
(FPOs) and contract farming arrangements can help farmers gain better market
access and higher prices.

4. Facilitate Access to Finance and Insurance

 Improve Credit Accessibility: Increase the reach of low-interest credit facilities


for small and marginal farmers to help them invest in better inputs and post-harvest
storage facilities. Government agencies, like NABARD, could develop more
accessible financing models for these farmers.
 Expand Crop Insurance Coverage: Make crop insurance schemes more robust
and cover marketing risks as well. Insurance against price fluctuations can help
farmers minimize losses and secure stable incomes.

5. Increase Farmer Awareness and Capacity Building

 Conduct Training Programs: Organize workshops on market awareness, post-


harvest management, and quality standards to help farmers understand demand
patterns, quality requirements, and how to reduce wastage.
 Promote Market Information Services: Enhance the reach of real-time market
information services (e.g., Agmarknet) through mobile apps and SMS alerts, so that
farmers can stay updated on market prices, trends, and demand.

6. Encourage Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)

 Leverage PPP for Infrastructure: Encourage partnerships with private players in


logistics, cold storage, and processing units, which can bring efficiency, modern
technology, and investment to rural areas.
 Support Supply Chain Innovations: Collaborate with the private sector to create
efficient supply chains that reduce wastage, improve market reach, and support
farm-to-fork models.

7. Strengthen Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)

 Promote FPOs for Better Bargaining Power: Strengthen and incentivize FPOs to
enable small farmers to pool resources, negotiate better prices, and access larger
markets collectively. FPOs can provide a stronger collective voice in the market.
 Provide Financial and Technical Support to FPOs: Offer training and financial
assistance to FPOs for infrastructure development, market linkage, and negotiation
skills, allowing them to operate more independently and efficiently.

8. Introduce and Support Price Stabilization Mechanisms

 Strengthen MSP and Market Intervention Schemes (MIS): Enhance the MSP
system to cover a wider range of crops, ensuring that farmers have a safety net. The
Market Intervention Scheme should also be expanded to provide timely
interventions in volatile markets, particularly for perishable produce.
 Establish Farmer Income Protection Schemes: Explore schemes that protect
farmers’ incomes against major price drops due to market fluctuations, especially
during harvest season.

9. Invest in Research and Technology

 Focus on Research in Market Demand and Price Forecasting: Invest in research


institutions to study crop demand, price trends, and consumer patterns, helping
farmers make more informed decisions about crop selection and timing of sales.
 Implement Precision Agriculture Tools: Use technology such as IoT, AI, and data
analytics to help farmers predict weather conditions, market demand, and optimal
pricing, thereby increasing productivity and profitability.

10. Create Export Opportunities for Farmers

 Develop Infrastructure for Export Quality Standards: Help farmers and FPOs
understand and meet export quality standards by setting up quality control and
packaging centers. This will allow them to tap into international markets and get
better prices.
 Facilitate Access to Export Markets: Develop export zones and special schemes
to encourage the cultivation and marketing of export-oriented crops. Streamlining
export procedures and providing assistance for certifications can also boost market
access for farmers.
CONCLUSION

Agriculture remains a cornerstone of the Indian economy, supporting livelihoods for a


significant portion of the population This study aimed to analyze the various facets of
agricultural marketing, from understanding its fundamental role to examining the specific
marketing channels that connect producers to consumers. Through a doctrinal approach,
the study highlighted critical issues that hinder the efficiency of agricultural markets, such
as inadequate infrastructure, information asymmetry, and the dominance of
intermediaries. These obstacles often result in suboptimal returns for farmers and inflated
prices for consumers, underscoring the pressing need for reform.

The state plays an essential role in addressing these shortcomings, with several initiatives
underway to improve market access, transparency, and fair pricing. Despite these efforts,
deeper interventions are necessary to modernize agricultural markets. This includes
investing in infrastructure, expanding digital tools to bridge information gaps, and
promoting cooperative marketing models that empower farmers and reduce intermediary
influence. Greater emphasis on fair pricing mechanisms, efficient transportation, and cold
storage facilities can also help minimize post-harvest losses, further enhancing farmers’
incomes.

By implementing these recommendations, agricultural marketing in India can become


more equitable and efficient, ultimately benefiting farmers, consumers, and the economy
as a whole. In conclusion, creating a sustainable and transparent agricultural marketing
system requires collaborative efforts from both the public and private sectors. Through
continued reform and innovation, agricultural markets can better serve the needs of all
stakeholders, fostering a more resilient and prosperous agricultural sector and, by
extension, a stronger Indian economy.
BIBLIOGRAPHY/REFERENCES

1 TR Jain (2020-21) Indian Economic Development VK Ohri

2 Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. (2022).


Annual Report 2021-22. Government of India.
https://agricoop.nic.in/

3 Acharya, S. S., & Agarwal, N. L. (2017). Agricultural Marketing in India.


Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.

4 National Institute of Agricultural Marketing. (2021). Marketing Channels


and Marketing Margins. Retrieved from
http://www.ccsniam.gov.in/

5 Dastagiri, M. B., Chand, R., & Ashok, K. (2014). Indian Agricultural


Markets: Defects, Remedies, and Suggestions. Economic and Political
Weekly, 49(50), 29-34.

6 Reddy, A. A., & Reddy, S. S. (2021). Agricultural Marketing in India: An


Analytical Approach. New Century Publications.

You might also like