IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)

Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2024, pp. 4241~4248

ISSN: 2252-8938, DOI: 10.11591/ijai.v13.i4.pp4241-4248  4241

Image analysis for classifying coffee bean quality using a multi-

feature and machine learning approach

Anindita Septiarini1, Hamdani Hamdani1, Aji Ery Burhandeny2, Damar Nurcahyono3,

Surya Eka Priyatna4
1
Department of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia
3
Department of Information Technology, Politeknik Negeri Samarinda, Samarinda, Indonesia
4
Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Da'wah and Communication Sciences, Antasari State Islamic University,
Banjarmasin, Indonesia

Article Info ABSTRACT

Article history: Price and customer satisfaction depend on coffee bean quality. The coffee
industry must analyze coffee bean quality. Global demand for robusta coffee
Received Nov 27, 2023 is high. Coffee industry professionals mostly understand coffee bean quality.
Revised Feb 11, 2024 Thus, an image analysis using a computer vision-based approach for
Accepted Feb 28, 2024 classifying robusta coffee bean quality is required. Image acquisition, region
of interest (ROI) detection, pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction,
feature selection, and classification are covered in this study. A multi-feature
Keywords: derived based on color, shape, and texture features was employed in feature
extraction, followed by feature selection using principal component analysis
Coffee beans (PCA). Several machine-learning methods classified the coffee beans. The
Features selection method performance was assessed using precision, recall, and accuracy. The
K-means selected features using the backpropagation neural network (BPNN)
Machine learning classifier outperformed others with 98.54% accuracy.
Principal component analysis
This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA license.

Corresponding Author:
Anindita Septiarini
Department of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Mulawarman University
St. Sambaliung, No. 9, Samarinda, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]

1. INTRODUCTION
The utilization of computers and associated technologies is seeing fast expansion and
diversification. The application of this is being observed in the field of agriculture. There exist multiple
instances wherein computers have been employed in the agricultural sector, encompassing the monitoring of
fruit ripeness [1], [2], land management [3], and plant development [4], [5]. Coffee, as one of the most
widely consumed beverages globally, holds significant importance as an economic commodity. The global
popularity of coffee can be attributed to its stimulating properties and the preference for its bitter flavor.
Coffee serves as a substantial provider of caffeine for a considerable number of individuals. While previous
research has established a connection between coffee and caffeine intake and adverse health effects, recent
studies have presented evidence suggesting that the compounds found in coffee, such as caffeine, chlorogenic
acids, kahweol, cafestol, and various micronutrients (such as magnesium, potassium, and phosphorus), may
enhance the immune system and provide protection against the development of conditions such as obesity,
diabetes, neurological diseases, osteoporosis, and pancreatic cancer [6].
The coffee industry values quality because of the relationship between coffee bean scarcity,
monetary compensation, and consumer happiness. Robusta coffee beans, widely grown, have a distinct taste
and aroma. Quality of robusta coffee beans depends on soil makeup, climate, and processing method. Coffee

Journal homepage: http://ijai.iaescore.com

4242  ISSN: 2252-8938

prices depend on bean quality. It is crucial to note that not all growers and coffee shop owners can identify
coffee bean quality. Thus, errors may occur when they lack this expertise. Grading is time-consuming and
produces inconsistent outcomes. Due to visual perception limits, fatigue, and coffee quality evaluation
differences, these inconsistencies occur. Visual characteristics are often used to evaluate robusta coffee
beans. In this situation, computer vision may work. It extracts robusta coffee bean visual traits that highly
predict quality. Color, form, and texture may be needed for this procedure.
Numerous research investigations have been conducted in computer vision, focusing on the application
of food processing. These studies encompass a range of food items, such as banana [7], honey [8], date fruit [9],
palm oil [10], and coffee [11], [12]. The construction of this system involves several general processes, namely
pre-processing, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification [13]. Common pre-processing tasks often
involve scaling [14] and converting color spaces [15]. The Otsu thresholding method [13], K-means clustering
algorithm [16], and edge detection approach [17] were subsequently employed, along with many established
segmentation methodologies. The extractable features that can be considered for edibles encompass color [10],
shape [18], and texture [11]. Moreover, naïve Bayes (NB) [10], k-nearest neighbor (KNN) [19], and support
vector machines (SVM) [10] are frequently utilized in the classification process.
Recent studies have used machine learning to classify coffee beans across agricultural situations.
Color and shape helped identify high-quality beans. The investigation used image processing and machine
learning on an Arduino mega board. Essential criteria were assessed to determine high-quality green coffee
beans. KNN was used to evaluate coffee beans and classify them by defect type. Logic, image processing,
and supervised learning algorithms are executed and coded on the Arduino board. The machine vision system
has an average accuracy of 94.79% for quality and 95.78% for defect-type evaluation. However, long berry
bean classification was 98.05% accurate [20]. Subsequently, a variety of machine learning methodologies
such as SVM, deep neural networks (DNN), and random forest (RF) were utilized to evaluate the
significance of shape and color characteristics in the assessment of faults in coffee beans. The data presented
in the study highlights the significance of color descriptors in the classification of faults in coffee beans. The
classification models consider the most significant features obtained from the average G value of the
component in the RGB color space and the average V value in the HSV color space. All the classifier models
exhibited comparable performance, with the best accuracy value above 88% [12].
Several efforts were presented in order to identify and categorize coffee fruits, as well as to map the
stage of maturation of these fruits during the harvest process. The methodology was executed utilizing the
Darknet framework. The YOLOv3-tiny object identification system identified and categorized coffee fruit.
The collection contains 90 videos from the 2020 arabica coffee (Catuaí 144) harvest, shot at a coffee
harvester's discharge conveyor termination point. A business area in Patos de Minas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
hosted the recordings. The model performed best at around 3300th iteration with an 800×800-pixel image
input. The model had 84% mean average precision (mAP), 82% F1-score, 83% precision, and 82% recall in
the validation set. The precision values for unripe, ripe, and overripe coffee fruits were 86%, 85%, and 80%,
respectively [21]. Another study used a convolutional network on an inexpensive micro-controller board to
classify coffee leaf diseases locally without the internet. Early diagnosis of coffee plant diseases was crucial
for optimal output and production quality. Two datasets and development board images were used in this
investigation. The collection included around 6000 images from six sickness classes. The incorporated
cascade and single-stage systems were 98% and 96% accurate, respectively. These findings imply that these
structures detect coffee plantation diseases [22].
This study presents a proposed method for classifying coffee bean quality based on computer vision
techniques. The method utilizes color, shape, and texture data extracted from the RGB, HSV, and L*a*b
color spaces. The BP was employed as the classifier in this work. The objective of this method was to
ascertain the classification of coffee beans according to their quality by utilizing image data. The quality
types were classified into four classes: intact, perforated, wrinkled, and cracked.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The approach predicted the quality class of all robusta coffee bean photos. Its main processes were
region of interest (ROI) detection, pre-processing, feature extraction, selection, and classification. The
method has two phases: training and testing. Training and testing sets provided input for each phase. Both
phases were handled differently. ROI detection assigned the coffee bean area to the image using K-means
clustering. The training step pre-processed RGB data into grayscale, HSV, and L*a*b. Afterward, color,
texture, and shape were used to extract features. Subsequently, the feature selection procedure was used to
choose the most significant features and simplify classification. Pre-processing merely converted RGB to the
feature selection color space during testing. Principal component analysis (PCA) generated the selected
features in the proposed technique. The feature selection result was used to apply the extracted feature. A

Int J Artif Intell, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2024: 4241-4248

Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938  4243

prediction class (intact/perforated/wrinkled/cracked) was determined from selected features in the final step.
Figure 1 illustrates the robusta coffee bean quality classification.

Figure 1. Overview of all steps in the proposed method for quality classification of robusta coffee bean

2.1. Dataset
The dataset in this study was images of robusta coffee beans. JPEG images were taken with a Xiaomi
5A smartphone's inbuilt camera. The coffee bean was placed on a white background in the center of a 28×19×18
cm studio minibox. A 10 cm gap between the camera and the coffee beans was maintained by deliberately
positioning and orienting the camera. Smartphone cameras are 13-megapixel. The image has dimensions of
1560×1560 pixels. The dataset had 1440 coffee bean images, 360 each class. It was divided into four classes:
intact, perforated, wrinkled, or cracked, with the example image shown in Figures 2(a) to 2(d), respectively.

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 2. Examples of coffee bean images with various quality types: (a) intact, (b) perforated, (c) wrinkled,
and (d) cracked

2.2. Region of interest detection

ROI detection attempts to generate a sub-image mostly of the coffee bean area. During this stage,
the initial resolution of the image was reduced from 1560×1560 pixels to 500×500 pixels [3] to minimize the
computational time. Subsequently, a color space conversion was performed from RGB to L*a*b; this enabled
the system to accurately differentiate between object and background regions in various scenarios. The
utilization of L*a*b color spaces necessitates a conversion procedure that relies on the values within the RGB
color space, which are explicitly defined as in [23].
The result of the conversion of an original image in RGB Figure 3(a) to L*a*b color space is
depicted in Figure 3(b). Furthermore, by employing the clustering with the K-means algorithm [16], the area
of coffee beans was approximated. Due to the division of the image's area into two distinct regions—the
coffee bean region and the background region—the value of K was set into two. The steps of the K-means
algorithm are defined as follows [24]:
− Step 1: initialize number of cluster k and centre.
− Step 2: For each pixel of an image, calculate the Euclidean distance d, between the centre and each pixel
of an image using the relation given.

𝑑 = ‖𝑝(𝑥, 𝑦) − 𝑐𝑘 ‖ (1)
Image analysis for classifying coffee bean quality using a multi-feature … (Anindita Septiarini)
4244  ISSN: 2252-8938

− Step 3: Assign all the pixels to the nearest centre based on distance d.
− Step 4: After all pixels have been assigned, recalculate new position of the centre using the relation given:
1
𝐶𝑖 = ∑𝑦𝜖𝑐𝑘 ∑𝑥𝜖𝑐𝑘 𝑝(𝑥, 𝑦) (2)
𝑘

− Step 4: Repeat the process until it satisfies the tolerance or error value.
− Step 5: Reshape the cluster pixels into image.
The resulting image of the K-means algorithm is shown in Figure 3(c). Afterward, a morphological
operation was applied using dilation; hence, the coffee bean area approaches the original, and the result is
depicted in Figure 3(d). Subsequently, the setting of the coffee bean area was carried out as the ground for
defining the ROI image boundary based on the yellow box, as shown in Figure 3(e). Accordingly, the formed
ROI images in binary and RGB color space are shown in Figures 3(f) and 3(g).

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 3. The resulting image of each process in ROI detection: (a) original image in RGB color space,
(b) L*a*b color space, (c) K-means clustering, (d) morphological operation, (e) setting the area of ROI
image, and (f) ROI image

2.3. Pre-processing
This procedure generated parameter values for feature extraction. This study examined color,
texture, and shape. RGB images must be converted to L*a*b and HSV to create color features, RGB images
to grayscale to create texture features, and binary images to build form features. In order to improve
classification results, the color space must be changed during pre-processing. Agricultural research uses RGB
for object classification. Some investigations have employed L*a*b and HSV color spaces. Using different
color spaces requires a conversion technique that uses RGB values [23]. In (3)-(6) define RGB-to-L*a*b
conversion. In HSV color space, in (3)-(4) calculate hue (H) and then saturation (S) and value (V). S and V
values were computed using as (5) and (6).

𝜃, 𝐵 ≤ 𝐺
𝐻={ (3)
360 − 𝜃, 𝐵 > 𝐺
where:
1
[(𝑅−𝐺)+(𝑅−𝐵)]
𝜃 = 𝑐𝑜𝑠 −1 {[𝑥(𝑅−𝐺)
2
2 +(𝑅−𝐵)(𝐺−𝐵]1/2 } (4)

0, max (𝑅, 𝐺, 𝐵) = 0
𝑆={ min(𝑅,𝐺,𝐵) (5)
1 − max(𝑅,𝐺,𝐵) , 𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑤𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑉 = max (𝑅, 𝐺, 𝐵) (6)

Furthermore, converting the RGB image to a grayscale image was needed; hence, this work applied
texture features. These feature parameters will later be used as input for the classification process. RGB
conversion to grayscale is carried out to produce intensity (I) values using (7) [11].
1
𝐼 = 3 (𝑅 + 𝐺 + 𝐵) (7)

2.4. Feature extraction

Coffee bean image feature extraction retrieves color, texture, and shape information. Some studies
analyze one aspect, while others analyze several. This study analyzes three approaches for extracting
three-color features using RGB, HSV, and L*a*b color model statistical values. RGB, HSV, and L*a*b are

Int J Artif Intell, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2024: 4241-4248

Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938  4245

useful color characteristics in many applications. Converting RGB to HSV and L*a*b limits color space
dimensions and features. Texture feature extraction using the gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)
follows. Our form feature extraction approach uses statistical characteristics and shape distance in the binary
picture. Table 1 lists method feature counts. Adding features doesn't necessarily enhance model performance.
Thus, accurate classification requires careful feature selection.

Table 1. The number of features

Type of features Method Number of Features
Color RGB Model 3
HSV Model 3
L*a*b Model 3
Texture Statistic Feature of GLCM 84
Shape Area-Based 2

2.4.1. Color feature extraction

The HSV, RGB, and L*a*b color spaces have been used as color features to differentiate various
objects [11]. In (8) uses the mean to examine each color model channel's statistical properties. Where μ is the
average color channel. This study seeks HSV, RGB, or L*a*b feature extraction methods for coffee bean
data analysis. This study got red, green, and blue color values from the RGB image, hue, saturation, and
value values from the HSV image, and lightness (L) and color-opponent dimensions (a and b) indicating
redness–greenness and blueness–yellowness from the L*a*b image.
1
𝜇 = 𝑀𝑁 ∑𝑀 𝑁
𝑖=1 ∑𝑗=1(𝐼𝑖𝑗 ) (8)

2.4.2. Texture feature extraction

Coffee bean textures can be identified by texture. Coffee bean fiber has distinct visual and texture
properties. The color characteristics of the perforated, wrinkled, cracked class are similar to those of the
intact class, making identification difficult. Only GLCM is used to extract texture features in this
investigation. GLCM has been used for texture feature extraction with good results.
Calculating the probability of the adjacency relationship between two pixels at a specific distance
and angle orientation yields GLCM [1]. Calculate the image's statistical attributes after collecting the
co-occurrence matrix. GLCM statistical features exist for four angles (0 ∘, 45∘, 90∘, and 135∘) and one distance
(1 pixel). GLCM (i, j) is the joint probability distribution of a pixel pair with gray levels i and j. Image gray
level determines GLCM matrix rows and columns. L is the computed gray levels minus 1. The grayscale
value of an image between 0 and 255 [7]. The types of features used in GLCM in this research include: auto
correlation, cluster prominence, cluster shade, contrast, correlation, difference entropy, difference variance,
dissimilarity, energy, entropy, IDM, information measures of correlation 1, and 2, inverse difference,
maximum probability, sum averages, sum entropy, sum of squares variances, sum variance, IDM normalized,
inverse difference normalized.

2.4.3. Shape feature extraction

The k-means method was employed to convert the coffee beans image into a binary image in order
to remove noise in the shape of the coffee bodies. The goal of the K-means algorithm is to cluster objects by
grouping them with the K points that are closest to them in the space. The values of cluster centroids are
updated iteratively until the optimal clustering results are achieved. Various shape parameters, such as
eccentricity (e) and perimeter (p), are calculated to assess the characteristics of coffee bean shape [20].

𝑏2
𝑒 = √1 − 𝑎2 (9)

(𝑎2 +𝑏 2)
𝑝 = 2𝜋√ (10)
2

2.5. Feature selection

The analysis should consider the total amount of features in order to identify the most beneficial or
highly discriminative features within the utilized dataset. The present study employed PCA as a method for
conducting feature selection. PCA is a well-established technique in the field of pattern recognition and
computer vision. It serves as a standard method for feature extraction and data representation, commonly
employed to identify and recognize objects. A statistical method reduced the number of dimensions in data
Image analysis for classifying coffee bean quality using a multi-feature … (Anindita Septiarini)
4246  ISSN: 2252-8938

sets with many factors. It makes object recognition work better and has been shown to lower and raise the
accuracy value [25].

2.6. Classification
Data is classified by classification. Machine learning has several plant objects uses. By researching
algorithms and using data to forecast, machine learning automates operations. The algorithm uses a model to
estimate data and make judgments based on sample input instead than following fixed instructions.
Mathematical and statistical models predicted unknown data using training data. This study classified coffee
bean quality using machine learning. Backpropagation neural network (BPNN), linear discriminant analysis
(LDA), KNN, NB, and SVM were used. Previous research on numerous plant specimens used these
methodologies [19], [25].

2.7. Performance measurement

Feature selection and different classification approaches are used to evaluate the proposed method's
performance and determine the most appropriate and robust method for the data set. This study evaluates
1140 robusta bean photos (360 intact, 360 perforated, 360 wrinkled, and 360 cracked). The performance of
the classification method was assessed using three indicators: accuracy [25], which were calculated based on
the multiclass confusion matrix. The parameters are defined by (11) [25].
𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎
𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑦 = × 100 (11)
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The total number of 1440 images consisted of four classes, including intact, perforated, wrinkled,
and cracked, used to evaluate the method. The classification results were compared for feature sets obtained
without and with feature selection. The feature set without feature selection was performed using the features
formed by GLCM, which were area-based and color-based (RGB, HSV, and L*a*b). The selected features
were applied to PCA. The experiment utilized five classifiers: BPNN, KNN, LDA, NB, and SVM. The
method's performance was assessed using accuracy. The comparison of method performance with different
classifiers using multi-feature indicated by the accuracy value is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2 demonstrates the testing of situations without feature selection. The tests were conducted
using texture characteristics obtained by the GLCM approach, texture data combined with shape features
(Area-based), and texture features combined with HSV, L*a*b, and RGB color spaces. The BPNN classifier
achieved the maximum accuracy of 94.83% while utilizing the GLCM. Subsequently, the LDA, KNN, SVM,
and NB classifiers yielded decreasing accuracy values of 92.08%, 85.21%, 83.54%, and 80.83%,
respectively. The BPNN classifier achieved the maximum accuracy of 97.86% for the area-based feature set,
while the NB classifier had the lowest accuracy of 58.54%. The performance relied on color attributes
derived from three color spaces: HSV, L*a*b, and RGB. The performance of the approach utilizing HSV
showed that SVM attained an ideal accuracy rate of 92.92%. Using the L*a*b and RGB feature sets, the
BPNN achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 97.71%.

Table 2. Performance comparison of the classifier with various feature sets based on accuracy value (%)
Without features selection With features selection
Classifier
GLCM Area Based HSV L*a*b RGB PCA
BPNN 94.83 97.86 84.79 97.71 97.71 98.54
KNN 85.21 84.38 85.42 90.83 89.79 90.83
LDA 92.08 91.46 77.92 91.46 68.33 80.63
NB 80.83 58.54 53.96 53.54 48.54 55.83
SVM 83.54 72.71 92.92 97.50 94.83 97.50

In the results obtained via PCA feature selection, the backpropagation classifier attained the
maximum accuracy value of 98.54%. By contrast, the NB classifier yielded the lowest results, achieving an
accuracy of 55.83%. Backpropagation demonstrates high accuracy across all feature test situations without
requiring feature selection. The LDA algorithm achieved the highest accuracy rate of 98.54% across all four
test scenarios. It was performed using the GLCM feature, Area-based method, HSV color space values, and
PCA application for feature selection. The NB classifier is consistently overwhelmed by every trial situation.
The observed results indicate that a combination of texture, shape, and color features, followed by feature
selection to limit the number of features, might lead to high accuracy throughout the classification process.
The BPNN classifier performs better than other classifiers by minimizing errors in each scenario.

Int J Artif Intell, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2024: 4241-4248

Int J Artif Intell ISSN: 2252-8938  4247

4. CONCLUSION
This study classifies robusta coffee beans by quality. There are four types of coffee beans: intact,
perforated, wrinkled, and broken. This procedure involves ROI detection, pre-processing, segmentation,
feature extraction, selection, and classification. Each step is done to accurately classify coffee beans and
determine their quality. The study tested designs with texture, texture with shape, and texture with color
space values (HSV, L*a*b, and RGB). BPNN study routinely outperforms other coffee bean quality
assessment methodologies. It uses the PCA feature selection technique to get the best results on GLCM,
area-based, and L*a*b features with 98.54% accuracy. Using several scenarios and attributes can improve the
variety and quality of this research.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to thank the Faculty of Engineering at Mulawarman University in Samarinda,
Indonesia, for providing financial support for the research conducted in 2023 (No. 497/UN17.L1/HK/2023).

REFERENCES
[1] M. R. Fiona, S. Thomas, I. J. Maria, and B. Hannah, “Identification of ripe and unripe citrus fruits using artificial neural
network,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1362/1/012033.
[2] S. Munera, F. Hernández, N. Aleixos, S. Cubero, and J. Blasco, “Maturity monitoring of intact fruit and arils of pomegranate cv.
‘Mollar de Elche’ using machine vision and chemometrics,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 156, 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.110936.
[3] Hamdani, A. Septiarini, and D. M. Khairina, “Model assessment of land suitability decision making for oil palm plantation,” i n
2016 2nd International Conference on Science in Information Technology, ICSITech 2016: Information Science for Green Society
and Environment, IEEE, 2017, pp. 109–113, doi: 10.1109/ICSITech.2016.7852617.
[4] A. Yudhana, R. Umar, and F. M. Ayudewi, “The monitoring of corn sprouts growth using the region growing methods,” in
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1373/1/012054.
[5] A. Sezgin and V. Küçük, “Computer science monitoring plant growth with image processing methods and artificial intelligence supported
agriculture system,” in International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium, 2022, pp. 165-176, doi: 10.53070/bbd.1172774.
[6] B. Açıkalın and N. Sanlier, “Coffee and its effects on the immune system,” Trends in Food Science & Technology, vol. 114, pp.
625–632, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.023.
[7] E. Piedad, J. I. Larada, G. J. Pojas, and L. V. V Ferrer, “Postharvest classification of banana (Musa acuminata) using tier-based
machine learning,” Postharvest Biology and Technology, vol. 145, pp. 93–100, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.06.004.
[8] A. Noviyanto and W. H. Abdulla, “Honey botanical origin classification using hyperspectral imaging and machine learning,”
Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 265, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2019.109684.
[9] D. Zhang, D. J. Lee, B. J. Tippetts, and K. D. Lillywhite, “Date maturity and quality evaluation using color distribution analysis
and back projection,” Journal of Food Engineering, vol. 131, pp. 161–169, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.02.002.
[10] A. Septiarini, H. Hamdani, T. Hardianti, E. Winarno, S. Suyanto, and E. Irwansyah, “Pixel quantification and color feature extraction
on leaf images for oil palm disease identification,” in 7th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Information
Engineering: Technological Breakthrough for Greater New Life, 2021, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ICEEIE52663.2021.9616645.
[11] W. G. D. Costa, I. D. P. Barbosa, J. E. D. Souza, C. D. Cruz, M. Nascimento, and A. C. B. D. Oliveira, “Machine learning and
statistics to qualify environments through multi-traits in Coffea arabica,” PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. e0245298–e0245298, Jan.
2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245298.
[12] F. F. L. D. Santos, J. T. F. Rosas, R. N. Martins, G. D. M. Araújo, L. D. A. Viana, and J. D. P. Gonçalves, “Quality assessment of coffee
beans through computer vision and machine learning algorithms,” Coffee Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2020, doi: 10.25186/.v15i.1752.
[13] A. Septiarini, H. Hamdani, A. Rifani, Z. Arifin, N. Hidayat, and H. Ismanto, “Multi-class support vector machine for arabica coffee
bean roasting grade classification,” in ICOIACT 2022 - 5th International Conference on Information and Communications Technology:
A New Way to Make AI Useful for Everyone in the New Normal Era, 2022, pp. 407–411, doi: 10.1109/ICOIACT55506.2022.9971897.
[14] R. S. El-Sayed and M. N. El-Sayed, “Classification of vehicles’ types using histogram oriented gradients: comparative study and
modification,” IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 700–712, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijai.v9.i4.pp700-712.
[15] M. Sharif, M. A. Khan, Z. Iqbal, M. F. Azam, M. I. U. Lali, and M. Y. Javed, “Detection and classification of citrus diseases in
agriculture based on optimized weighted segmentation and feature selection,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 150,
pp. 220–234, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.023.
[16] A. Septiarini, H. Hamdani, S. U. Sari, H. Rahmania Hatta, N. Puspitasari, and W. Hadikurniawati, “Image processing techniques
for tomato segmentation applying k-means clustering and edge detection approach,” in 2021 International Seminar on Machine
Learning, Optimization, and Data Science, ISMODE 2021, IEEE, 2022, pp. 92–96, doi: 10.1109/ISMODE53584.2022.9742740.
[17] J. Lu et al., “Lightweight green citrus fruit detection method for practical environmental applications,” Computers and
Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 215, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108205.
[18] J. Liang, K. Huang, H. Lei, Z. Zhong, Y. Cai, and Z. Jiao, “Occlusion-aware fruit segmentation in complex natural environments
under shape prior,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 217, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108620.
[19] X. Yang, R. Zhang, Z. Zhai, Y. Pang, and Z. Jin, “Machine learning for cultivar classification of apricots (Prunus armeniaca L.)
based on shape features,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 256, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.05.051.
[20] H. Li, W. S. Lee, and K. Wang, “Identifying blueberry fruit of different growth stages using natural outdoor color images,”
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 106, pp. 91–101, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.05.015.
[21] García, C. Becerra, and Hoyos, “Quality and defect inspection of green coffee beans using a computer vision system,” Applied
Sciences, vol. 9, no. 19, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9194195.
[22] H. C. Bazame, J. P. Molin, D. Althoff, and M. Martello, “Detection, classification, and mapping of coffee fruits during harvest
with computer vision,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 183, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106066.
[23] F. G. -Lamont, J. Cervantes, A. López, and L. Rodriguez, “Segmentation of images by color features: A survey,”
Neurocomputing, vol. 292, pp. 1–27, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.01.091.
[24] N. Dhanachandra, K. Manglem, and Y. J. Chanu, “Image segmentation using K-means clustering algorithm and subtractive

Image analysis for classifying coffee bean quality using a multi-feature … (Anindita Septiarini)
4248  ISSN: 2252-8938

clustering algorithm,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 54, pp. 764–771, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.06.090.
[25] A. Septiarini, R. Saputra, A. Tedjawati, M. Wati, and H. Hamdani, “Pattern recognition of sarong fabric using machine learning
approach based on computer vision for cultural preservation,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol.
15, no. 5, pp. 284–295, 2022, doi: 10.22266/ijies2022.1031.26.

BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS

Anindita Septiarini is a professor at the Department of Informatics at

Mulawarman University, Indonesia. She holds a Doctoral degree in Computer Science from
Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia, specializing in image analysis. She is also a researcher
and got a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of
Indonesia from 2016 until the present. Her research interests lie in artificial intelligence,
especially pattern recognition, image processing, and computer vision. She has received
national awards such as scientific article incentives from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Research, and Technology of Indonesia in 2017 and 2019. She held several administrative
posts with the Department of Informatics, Mulawarman University, Indonesia, from 2018 to
2020, including the head of department and the head of laboratory. She can be contacted at
email: [email protected].

Hamdani Hamdani is a professor in Department of Informatics at Mulawarman

University, Indonesia. He is a lecturer and researcher since 2005 at Mulawarman University,
Indonesia. His research interests lie in the field of artificial intelligence, especially pattern
recognition, decision support system, and expert system. He received her bachelor’s degree in
2002 from Ahmad Dahlan University, Indonesia, his master’s degree in 2009 from Gadjah
Mada University, Indonesia, and her doctoral degree in computer science in 2018 from
Gadjah Mada University Indonesia. He can be contacted at email: [email protected].

Aji Ery Burhandenny is an assistant professor in Department of Electrical

Engineering at Mulawarman University, Indonesia, specializing in Software Engineering. His
research interests lie in empirical software engineering particularly understanding human
factors in software development activities. He also made several contributions to internet of
things, machine learning, and green technologies related topics. He can be contacted at email:
[email protected].

Damar Nurcahyono is an assistant professor at The Information Technology

Department of the State Polytechnic of Samarinda, Indonesia, specializing in Software
Engineering. His research interests lie in software engineering especially games and
animation. He has also made several contributions to software development, game
development, and environmental technology-related topics. He can be contacted at email:
[email protected].

Surya Eka Priyatna is a lecturer at the Department of Information Engineering,

Antasari State Islamic University, Indonesia, specializing in mobile application design. His
research interests lie in human needs in the use of computer applications. He has also made
several contributions on topics related to mobile applications. He can be contacted at email:
[email protected].

Int J Artif Intell, Vol. 13, No. 4, December 2024: 4241-4248