1.1.1 Trucking Logistics
1.1.1 Trucking Logistics
1 TRUCKING LOGISTICS
Trucking logistics is the research and planning of trucking operations. Typically, trucking logistics takes into account all the factors involved in the transportation of goods by truck with the goal of maximizing productivity and efficiency. This may include planning the most efficient routes for truck drivers, selecting optimal fuel types according to market trends, choosing the best kind of trucks for the particular task, and hiring an excellent staff of truck drivers. In most industrialized nations, trucks usually are the primary means for commercial transportation and the circulation of goods. Excellent trucking logistics not only helps individual companies achieve success, but may also contribute to the greater benefit of a nations economy. Economic analysts view transportation as a very high expense for any business, meaning that good logistics may dramatically decrease economic expenses. Good planning can eliminate unnecessary expenditures that could limit the success of a business. Trucking logistics may analyze trucking routes, looking for ways to improve efficiency through the reduction of delivery times as well. The precise types of loads being carried are considered in order to determine the best means of transport. Road safety typically is emphasized to ensure the secure transportation of goods and the safety of both truck drivers and regular commuters by planning
delivery routes for specific types of loads. Heavy hauling and long hauling are more demanding aspects of trucking; good trucking logistics typically examines all factors to help facilitate these more difficult types of transport.
Air freight this is a modern and the safest mode to ensure a fast delivery of goods. A chosen one by many because of the swiftness of the system there are many companies that are now even providing super fats deliveries by airways even on the same day.
Land transport this is a means of logistics support that has withstood the test of time through the extensive network of roads in India. It has
been the popularly used method and used especially in the shipments of heavy articles like machinery and vehicles.
Railways this is also an age old method of shipments and transport. Though most used in case of domestic services this is very effective in the availability of cost effective logistics support in India.
Waterways an essential part of this industry this is also one of the oldest methods. Shipments and transportation of goods is done on an international basis through this way.
Sical Logistics Limited (SLL) is One of the largest Integrated Logistics Solutions Provider. It has its logistic operations in the following areas-: Stevedoring in all major ports in India CHA division provides Customs clearance Shipping division at all major ports. Trucking division covering all states in India. Sical's delivery network includes:
Exclusive walk-in berth at Chennai Port bulk cargo 450,000 Sq.ft of storage space across over 100 warehouses owned and
Fully mechanized coal handling and conveyor facility to handle 12 million tons per Annum at Ennore Port
Figure 1.3.1
Port Handling Sical operates a Walk-in Berth on scheme for 20 years - Chennai Port Handles over 26 Million tonnes annually Chennai - 2.5 Million Tonnes
- 6.5 Million Tonnes - 3.8 Million Tonnes - 8.5 Million Tonnes - 4.5 Million Tonnes
Have the experience of handling at Haldia for TNEB 5.5 Million Tonnes Have the experience of handling at Paradip port - 1.0 Million Tonnes annually (1997 2001)
Trucking Pan-India operations setup Owned maintenance Facility Arrangement in 20 Stations GSM based GPS tracking system for real-time tracking of high value cargo
Cargo Handled-Project and containerised cargo bulk, Liquid bulk, finished Bulk
CHA
CHA operations carried out on Pan India basis with 10 branches spread across India. Customers handled - TANCEM, Wipro,Nava karnataka Steels, BEML ,NMDC-Chennai, MMTC-Hyderabad, Jindal South West -Chennai &Bombay, Henkel etc
Shipping
Handled vessels in all major ports , representing 300-350 vessels per annum.
Customers handled- Setaf Saget SAS, France, Allied Maritime Inc, Greece, Oldendorff Carriers, Germany
Warehousing
Spread over area of about 4.5 lac sqft with 1 lac mt storage capacity
100 plus warehouses across Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Kerala
Products handled are fertilizers, cement and steel Value added services of bagging, strapping and shrink packing
Handles over 150,000 TEUs per annum in CFSs at Chennai, Tuticorin and Vizag
Market leader in Chennai and Vizag CFS markets for last 5years. Won accolades from Maersk for moving about 1,000 TEUs in 24 hrs Expansion of CFS business to Bangalore and Tuticorin. All CFS have EDI connectivity with Customs Office
Obtained PAN I All India license to operate container trains throughout the Indian Railway system
Commenced rail operations from March08. HCL major customers for domestic movement Currently operating 4 rakes 1 rake Raipur to Ghatsila (HCL) 1 rake - Daurai to Chennai 2 rakes Delhi to Chennai
Accolades Received
- Ranked 4th in Logistics Sector 06 - Logistics provider in Bulk Logistics Express logistics & Supply Chain Conclave -2007 - Best Container service Logistics provider Express logistics & Supply Chain Conclave -2008 - Best CFS in Chennai to SDL from Tamil Nadu Chamber of Commerce 2008
10
- Best CFS in Chennai from DP World - 2008 - Award for Traffic Excellence at Tuticorin port for the 6th consecutive year. - Award for Traffic Excellence at Chennai port for the 5th consecutive year
11
Decisions taken by Transportation Manager System (TMS) according to D.Aprile, J. Egeblad, A.C. Garavelli, S. Lisi, D. Pisinger it often affects other components in the SC network. Considering that, on average, 3.5% of manufacturers sales costs and 40-60% of total logistics costs are devoted to the movement of products, TM is a crucial issue in todays business environment. Today, companies frequently carry out loading anddistribution operations (planning and operative) based on operators experience, without formal optimization (software) aid. This may lead to space waste inside the container or even worse to infeasible loading. A further complication also occurs when a vehicle must serve more than one customer: it is necessary to optimize the delivery route in order to minimize driving distance and unloading work. Several authors have studied delivery optimization which is known as the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP).
12
formulation, the goal of the VRP is to serve a set of customers, having a known demand, minimizing the transportation cost, starting from a depot, where each vehicle comes back at the end of its route.
13
To find and choose the efficient route for the vehicles to operate thereby to get a better profit margin.
14
and hired vehicles for the four routes. At the end of this analysis a optimum product mix solution will be obtained which increases the existing profit margin.
15
The demand for vehicles plying in four different routes may vary depending on the requirement of the customer.
Vehicle availability may also vary especially in case of own vehicles as they would have gone for maintenance, Fitness check, RC renewal.
16
The changes in the price of diesel, oil and other market prices affect the profitability.
To combat to the market price changes the hired vehicles vendor revise the rates which may have an impact on the margin.
17
61796
75712
13916
18.38
Chennai- Nalagarh
98110
122464
24354
19.89
Chennai- Mandideep
58965
70016
11051
15.78
18
Table 4.1.1
19
Margin 21351.8 9
%Margin 30.80
Chennai - Dhar
76617.36
56729
19888.3 6
25.95
Chennai- Nalagarh
99195
122464
23269
19
Chennai- Mandideep
70972.24
56444. 7
14527.3
20.46
20
Table 4.1.2
4.2 TWO WAY ANOVA VEHICLES Vs PROFIT MARGIN FOR DIFFERENT ROUTES
4.2.1 HYPOTHESIS
H0 (Null Hypothesis) There is no significant difference between the two vehicles and the profit margin for different routes.
21
H1 (Alternate Hypothesis) There is significant difference between the two vehicles and the profit margin for different routes.
Own/Hired
Routes Margin
ChennaiSilvassa
ChennaiDhar
Chennai Nalagarh
Chennai Mandideep
Own Hired
12.80 30.8
18.38 25.95
19.89 19
15.78 20.46
Table 4.2.1.1
Table 4.2.2.1
22
5% Source Treatment Block SS 112.5 19 df 1 3 3 MS 112.5 6.33333 F 17.763 4.9737 pvalue 10.128 0.0244 9.2766 0.1102 Nalagar h 10 2 4 4 20 Mandideep Total Fcritical
Reject
120
24
48
48
240
INFERENCE
There is a significant difference between the two vehicles and margin for different routes
Table 4.3.1.1
INFERENCE
23
Silvassa Dhar 6 72 2 24
Nalagar h 4 48
Table 4.3.1.1.1
INFERENCE
As there is a huge demand for silvassa the availability of the own vehicles for it is also more.
24
Silvassa Dhar 6 72 2 24
Nalagar h 4 48
Table 4.3.1.2.1
INFERENCE
As there is a huge demand for silvassa the availability of the hired vehicles for it is kept high.
25
26
Table 4.3.2.1
INFERENCE
Fixed cost is the most important factor that affects the profit margin of the vehicles plying in different routes; hence fixed cost is calculated and deducted from the hired vehicles profit margin to combat opportunity loss.
27
Destination Own Margin per Trip (in Rs.) Hire Margin per Trip (in Rs.)
Table 4.3.3.1
INFERENCE
Own vehicle margin and hired vehicle margin after deducting the fixed cost. Per trip hired vehicle margin is high for all the destinations except Nalagarh where own vehicle gives more margin.
28
Table 4.3.4.1.1
INFERENCE
From the above calculation we can infer that Silvassa is the destination which is having a great potential to give good profit margin when deployed with hired vehicle.Hence entire demand for Silvassa is to be satisfied by deploying hired vehicles.
29
own hire 0 0 2 3 10 2 0 1
Table 4.3.4.2.1
INFERENCE
Hired vehicles are preferred for Silvassa and Dhar destinations whereas own vehicles for Nalagarh and Mandideep.
30
own 0 0 4 3
Hire 10 2 0 1
Table 4.3.4.3.1
INFERENCE
A projection of the revenue that would be generated by the optimum mix is Rs 354790 per month by all the routes.
31
Own 3 1 2 3
Hired 7 1 0 1
Table 4.3.5.1.1
INFERENCE
Revenue that is generated by the existing mix is Rs.312937 per month by all the routes. From the above table it is found that vehicle deployment is not optimal.
32
MONTH
Optimum Mix Profit 354790 Differenc e 38853
% Margin Improvement 11
Table 4.3.5.2.1
INFERENCE
Comparison between the existing mix profit margin and optimum mix profit margin shows that there will be a 11% improvement in profit if optimum product mix is deployed.
33
MONTH
Figure 4.3.5.3.1
INFERENCE
Diagram depicting destination wise own vehicles and hired vehicles margin per month.Existing mix and optimum product mix produces same margin in case of Nalagarh and Mandideep.Hence these two routes have been already optimally deployed.
34
Destination Total Margin Capacity of Own (in Rs.) Total Margin Capacity of Hire (in Rs.)
Table 4.3.6.1.1
INFERENCE
The own and hired vehicles margin for a year is calculated show that the total margin capacity given by hired vehicles is more than the own vehicles per year. The hired vehicles margin for Silvassa,Dhar and Mandideep is greater than own vehicles margin. Hence it is advisable to deploy hired vehicles for these destinations to improve the profits for a year.
35
CALCULATION
Demand 120 24 48 48
Hire 48 24 24 24
Table 4.3.6.2.1
INFERENCE
From the above calculation we can infer that Silvassa is the destination which is having a great potential to give good profit margin when deployed with hired vehicle.Hence entire demand for Silvassa for a year is to be satisfied by deploying hired vehicles. Mandideep and Nalagarh destinations can be deployed with own vehicles itself as they give better margins.
36
hire 120 24 0 12
INFERENCE
Hired vehicles are preferred to be deployed for Silvassa and Dhar destinations whereas own vehicles for Nalagarh and Mandideep.
37
own 0 0 48 36
Hire 120 24 0 12
INFERENCE
A projection of the revenue that would be generated by the optimum mix is Rs 259429824 per month by all the routes.
38
Own 72 0 24 36
Hire 48 24 24 12
Hired Vehicles Margin 1295856 396816 1168992 536304 Total Profit For all Routes
Table 4.3.7.1
INFERENCE
Revenue that is generated by the existing mix is Rs. 194283072 per month by all the routes. From the above table it is found that vehicle deployment is not optimal.
39
Difference 65146752
% Margin Improvement 25
Table 4.3.8.1
INFERENCE
Comparison between the existing mix profit margin and optimum mix profit margin shows that there will be a 25% improvement in profit if optimum product mix is deployed.
40
Table 4.3.9.1
INFERENCE
Diagram depicting destination wise own vehicles and hired vehicles margin per year.Existing mix and optimum product mix produces same margin in case of Nalagarh and Dhar .Hence these two routes have been already optimally deployed.
5.1 FINDINGS
41
This study reveals that there is a difference between the profit margins given by the own and hired vehicles for different destinations Silvassa,Dhar, Nalagarh and Mandideep.
Most the own vehicles are giving lesser profit margin than the hired vehicles for all the routes.
The reason behind the lesser margin is the fixed costs such as the maintenance, tax, permit, insurance and variable costs such as the driver and cleaner wages, inventory expenses, toll expenses, RTO mamool, enroute repairs expenses, diesel and oil expenses.
The route Chennai Silvassa is giving 13% more margin when operated with hired vehicle than on own vehicle. Whereas Chennai Nalagarh route own vehicles are found to be more profitable.
In case of Chennai- Mandideep route the margin remains almost the same for own and hired vehicles.
Chennai Dhar route produces is best margin when hired vehicles are deployed.
Analysis shows that there is more demand for the vehicle to operate in the Chennai Silvassa route.
As hired vehicles give a good profit percentage, this route is deployed only with hired vehicles for the optimum mix.
42
Same is the case with Chennai- Dhar hired vehicles are assigned for the optimum product mix
Own vehicles give good profit margin in Chennai- Nalagarh route. Hence the same is deployed for optimum mix.
In Chennai- Mandideeop route have a mix of 3:1 ratio of own and hired vehicles deployed.
By such Optimum product mix deployment there is a overall profit improvement to 11%for the four destinations from the existing margin.
The same deployment done for a year gives a 25% improvement in the profit margin.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
43
This study has to be conducted periodically as the profit margin greatly depends on prevailing market prices.
Any change in the cost of diesel and oil the hired vehicles vendor will revise the lending rates which may affect the profit margins.
The same study if done on a regular basis helps in identifying the gaps between the actuals and budgets profits and also the least and best profotable routes.
The study has been conducted for the four major frequently operated routes.The same can be done for the entire fleet of vehicles to enhance the profit of the trucking division as a whole.
This study can be further improvised by suggesting the organization to adopt operational strategy Hub and spoke study and Milk run logistics.
The above two strategies when implemented will not only give a better profit but also enables to achieve economies of scale.
5.3 CONCLUSION
44
The study titled A study on exploiting route-product mix to enhance profitability has helped in concluding that SICAL Logistics Ltd., is indeed gaining profit out of its operations of own and hired vehicles. But the profits obtained are not by the optimum deployment of vehicles. This study has helped greatly in finding the most profitable product mix and thus enabling to improve the profit margin every month and there by annually.
45