(Ebooks PDF) Download Memoirs of Roads Calcutta From Colonial Urbanization To Global Modernization 1st Edition Sumanta Banerjee Full Chapters
(Ebooks PDF) Download Memoirs of Roads Calcutta From Colonial Urbanization To Global Modernization 1st Edition Sumanta Banerjee Full Chapters
com
https://ebookgate.com/product/memoirs-of-roads-
calcutta-from-colonial-urbanization-to-global-
modernization-1st-edition-sumanta-banerjee/
https://ebookgate.com/product/global-urbanization-1st-edition-
eugenie-l-birch/
https://ebookgate.com/product/decolonizing-the-colonial-city-
urbanization-and-stratification-in-kingston-jamaica-1st-edition-
colin-clarke/
https://ebookgate.com/product/claiming-the-city-protest-crime-
and-scandals-in-colonial-calcutta-c-1860-1920-anindita-ghosh/
https://ebookgate.com/product/microsound-1st-edition-curtis-
roads/
The New Global Frontier Urbanization Poverty and
Environment in the 21st Century George Martine
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-new-global-frontier-
urbanization-poverty-and-environment-in-the-21st-century-george-
martine/
https://ebookgate.com/product/nutritional-management-of-
digestive-disorders-1st-edition-bhaskar-banerjee/
https://ebookgate.com/product/learning-to-forget-the-anti-
memoirs-of-modernity-1st-edition-dipankar-gupta/
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-agency-of-children-from-family-
to-global-human-rights-1st-edition-david-oswell/
https://ebookgate.com/product/roads-to-rome-the-antebellum-
protestant-encounter-with-catholicism-jenny-franchot/
Title Pages
Title Pages
Sumanta Banerjee
(p.iv)
Published in India by
Oxford University Press
Page 1 of 2
Title Pages
YMCA Library Building, 1 Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 110 001, India
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-946810-2
ISBN-10: 0-19-946810-9
Page 2 of 2
Epigraph
Epigraph
Sumanta Banerjee
(p.v)
‘Trodden by many feet, oh path, don’t muffle in your dust the sounds of the
footsteps from the past. I am lending my ear to those sounds. Please
whisper them to me.’
Page 1 of 1
Maps
(p.viii) Maps
Sumanta Banerjee
Map 1.1 Sutanuti, Kolikata, and Gobindapur, 1690, based on a map of the
late seventeenth century by George Herron 19
Map 1.2 The White Town and the Black Town, 1792–3, based on a map of
the late eighteenth century by A. Upjohn 33
Map 3.1 Bagbazar, 2016 82
Map 4.1 Shakespeare Sarani, 2016 115
Map 5.1 Rashbehari Avenue, 2016 136
Page 1 of 1
Acknowledgements
(p.ix) Acknowledgements
Sumanta Banerjee
The present research has been made possible by a generous grant of fellowship
from the Indian Institute of Advanced Study (IIAS), Shimla, in the serene
surroundings of which I wrote this book during 2012 and 2013. I owe a special
debt of gratitude to Professor Peter Ronald deSouza, Director, IIAS, who first
suggested that I apply for the fellowship, and welcomed me to the Institute as a
fellow on a sunny winter morning in November 2012. His concern and care for
both the academic and the personal needs of the fellows and success in building
up a fraternity of scholars made my stay at IIAS not only intellectually
productive but emotionally rewarding too.
I acknowledge the support that I received during my fieldwork from the staff of
the following institutions: National Archives of India, New (p.x) Delhi; National
Library, Kolkata; and Town Hall, Kolkata. I would also like to thank the reviewers
whose comments helped me expand the scope of the book for its publication. My
acknowledgements, however, would not be complete without paying tribute to
those countless informants outside the pages of archival documents and walls of
official establishments who helped me to construct this narrative by sharing
Page 1 of 2
Acknowledgements
Page 2 of 2
Introduction
Introduction
Sumanta Banerjee
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199468102.003.0001
The three elements of nature—water, air, and earth—have given us the means of
transportation and communication. But there has always been a contest among
the three over the possession of space. Of them, water, through its seas and
rivers, has been the first to offer humans the opportunity to carve out routes for
trade and commerce. Waterways still remain a major mode of exporting and
importing commercial goods from one port to another. But water has also been a
rather unfaithful friend to human beings. Its inherent nature of fluidity makes
rivers drift and change their courses, which both created and destroyed
civilizations in the past. Further, in alliance with its other partner, air, it often
turns out to be treacherous. While there is no doubt that the airborne rain helps
Page 1 of 13
Introduction
rivers to swell and irrigate lands, aiding in agriculture, air behaves erratically—
moving from total abstinence to extreme indulgence. Sometimes, it withdraws
rain and starves the rivers of water, causing droughts, and at other times, it
makes rain suddenly pour down in a calamitous waterfall, making rivers
overflow into floods, destroying the very agricultural fields that it had once
nurtured. It can even result in cyclonic disasters like tsunamis, which destroy
human habitation.
Air was a late addition to the field of transportation and communication, and air
transport only became possible with the invention of modern technology like
airplanes and satellites. This technology has indeed facilitated global
intercommunication by collapsing distances with the help of speed. But that too
has been no smooth affair. The whims of air such as storms or cyclones not only
have disastrous effects on air transport (p.2) and its passengers, but also
disrupt satellite-dependent communication systems.
Page 2 of 13
Introduction
overturned empires to replace them with others. The road, like no other
institution, brings together almost all facets of human life in one common space.
People live their existence through roads—dwelling in houses, shopping in
markets, walking or travelling in vehicles, and seeking entertainment in roadside
theatre houses or eating joints. The road, in this way, plays a decisive role in
transforming the surrounding reality and bringing about socio-economic,
political, and cultural changes in the lives of residents living on its either side.
At the same time, we should remember that the history of road-building has had
another side to it which is unsavoury. Driven by the growing urge for
urbanization, the state has often ruthlessly ousted people from their homelands
to make way for highways that cut through their traditional habitat.
It is believed that the first paved road was built in Egypt in 2500 BC by Pharaoh
Cheops as a private path to reach the site of the Great Pyramid. It was 1,000
yards long and 60 feet wide. Obviously, it was a demonstration of the exclusive
privilege that the ruler enjoyed. But the political needs of the rulers—expansion
of their territory, rapid movement of their armies, making their presence felt in
the distant corners of their states—soon led to the construction of public
highways. One of the earliest such roads was what is described as the King’s
Highway in the Old Testament. As its name suggests, it was built by royalty. Laid
down in 2000 BC, it provided a major route for both conquering armies and
traders, stretching from Damascus to the Gulf of Aqaba in the south, through
Syria to Mesopotamia, and finally on to Egypt. This road was later renamed
Trojan’s Road by the Romans. The same road was to be used in the eleventh and
twelfth centuries by the Crusaders in their war to reclaim the Holy Land. Among
other ancient roads was the Royal Road, built by the Persians from the Persian
Gulf to the Aegean Sea—a distance of 1,775 miles. The Incas in South America
Page 3 of 13
Introduction
constructed a system of roads that enabled them to expand their empire and
govern large stretches of that part of the continent. Ironically, it was these same
roads built by the Incas that betrayed them and proved to be their downfall.
Another generation of empire-builders—the Spaniards—used these roads to
move in their militarily superior soldiers and weapons for invading Inca territory
and defeating them.3
Thus, once built, irrespective of their original purposes, roads may not remain
partisan or neutral for long. They cannot be claimed to be the exclusive property
of their planners alone. Like the published text of authors, roads become
accessible to the public who may interpret (use) them according to their tastes
and needs. The Grand Trunk Road in South Asia is an excellent example of how a
once royal highway has become a public thoroughfare. This road spans India,
Pakistan, and Afghanistan, linking the eastern part of the subcontinent with the
western part. Its origins can be traced back to some 2,000 years ago (p.5) to
the reign of the Mauryas. In the sixteenth century, King Sher Shah of India
reconstructed the road, giving it the name Sadak-e-Azam, to facilitate the
movement of his army and for administrative purposes. It also remained a vital
link for trade and communication. Today, the road is split into two halves. One is
known as National Highway 1, stretching from Delhi to Wagah on the Indo-Pak
border in the west. The other is National Highway 2, starting from Delhi and
stretching to Kolkata in the east. Neither the Mauryas nor Sher Shah could have
dreamt of the way their road is being used today. Buses choking with
passengers, heavy trucks in a mad rush overtaking other vehicles, oil tankers
precariously edging their way through meandering bullock carts and aimlessly
wandering cattle, and the never-ending stream of human pedestrian traffic—all
these sights and sounds are a far cry from the ancient description of soldiers
riding horses along this road to conquer new lands or caravans of traders
stopping at wayside inns on the way to their next destination.
Traders and their stakes in interstate commercial traffic were the other factors
(along with the political requirements of the state) that motivated road-building
in the past. Roads became necessary for transportation of commodities from
their centres of production to market outlets. They began to be developed by
traders. Interestingly enough, unlike the state-built roads, which were known to
the public by the names of the rulers who built them, these roads were named
after the commodities which passed through them. Thus, we hear of the Amber
Route, which stretched from Afghanistan through Persia and Arabia to Egypt.
Or, the famous Silk Route, covering some 8,000 miles, beginning in China,
traversing across Asia, and then through Spain to the Atlantic Ocean. We can
imagine traders in the earliest days using slow animals to carry heavy goods
over the rough, unpaved roads. With the development of vehicular traffic, some
of the stretches of these ancient paths were turned into metalled roads and
converted to modern highways. While looking back at history, we can, therefore,
comprehend the twin (p.6) motivations that lay behind the evolution of what is
Page 4 of 13
Introduction
known today as the modern road system—the economic interests of the traders
and the political interests of the rulers.
It was the Vehicle that made the Road. It was the Wheel that made the
Vehicle. But the Wheel having made the Vehicle, and the Vehicle having
made the Road, the Road reacted back upon that which made it; and
though we cannot say that the Highway has, in changing, created a change
in Vehicles, yet we can say that, had it not changed, the new Vehicle could
not have come into being.4
Page 5 of 13
Introduction
the new highways that came up in the twentieth century were, therefore,
reconstructed according to the Telford system, which provided a more solid
roadbed for such heavy traffic.5
Roads thus get inextricably linked with cities. The original mud lane that used to
be the pathway for villagers was the first to be turned into a road during the
gradual transformation of that village into a city. Most modern roads in our
metropolitan cities can trace back their roots to the humble village lane.7 These
lanes evolved into wider roads along which were built structures that served the
needs of the urban population—houses, shops, markets, entertainment centres,
and parks, among other things. These new roads, besides continuing to be the
path of pedestrians, opened up a wide avenue for generations of vehicular
traffic, ranging from bullock carts and horse carriages to motor cars and trucks.
Page 6 of 13
Introduction
Linking this modern form of urbanization with the rise of capitalism in the West,
European Marxist theoreticians stress that urbanization was both the product of
and the driving force for the absorption of ‘surplus product’ in the process of
capital accumulation. Surplus product was necessary for producing surplus
value (leading to profit). Surpluses (whether from agriculture, mineral
resources, or industrial manufacturing) were extracted and their use controlled
by a minority of capitalist investors and entrepreneurs. They needed a vast
majority of consumers who could purchase the surplus product, and thus yield
profit for the capitalist investors. This majority could be brought together in one
single space—the city. Modern cities, therefore, were developed to market the
surplus product. To quote the best exponent of this theory, David Harvey:
‘Capitalism is perpetually producing the surplus product that urbanization
requires … [and] needs urbanization to absorb the surplus products it
perpetually produces…. The politics of capitalism are affected by the perpetual
need to find profitable terrains for capital surplus production and absorption.’8
One of the most profitable terrains is the city, and it is on this terrain that the
consumers are made to concentrate through a variety of infrastructural
attractions: provision of employment, housing, civic facilities, schools and
hospitals, entertainment, and so forth. The most important element in this vast
complex and composite network of infrastructure is the road, which allows the
transport system to link together the other elements of the network. To go back
to David Harvey’s theory of capital accumulation and urbanization:
The cost, speed and capacity of the transport system relate directly to
accumulation because of the impacts these have on the turnover time of
capital. Investment and innovation in transport are therefore potentially
productive for capital in general. Under capitalism, consequently, we see a
tendency to ‘drive beyond all spatial barriers’ and to ‘annihilate space with
time’ [to use Marx’s own expression].9 (p.10)
Page 7 of 13
Introduction
calculations also play their part. The demolition of a slum breaks down a settled
concentration of the labouring poor, who are forced to disperse in different
directions. This destroys their potential to mobilize in protest against injustice.
Such a paradigm for reorganization of space in modern urbanization was set
years ago by Baron Georges Haussmann in Paris. Under the ‘second
empire’ (1851–70), Napoleon III appointed him as Prefect of the Seine, with the
task of restructuring the streets of Paris. Haussmann demolished slums and built
through them wide new roads and boulevards, and constructed imposing offices
and apartment blocks on both sides. It was not a coincidence that Haussmann’s
plan to change the road structure of Paris came in the wake of the 1848 popular
uprising in that city, when workers built barricades around street corners and
fought the state’s armed forces. Walter Benjamin succinctly analyses the motives
behind Haussmann’s plan:
The true goal of Haussmann’s works was to secure the city against civil
war.… The width of the avenues was to prohibit the erection [of street
barricades] and new streets were to provide the shortest routes between
the [military] barracks and the working class sections.11
A large part of this new urban upper crust consists of employers and employees
in the information sector—the impact of which is no longer confined to urban
inter-communication, but extends to all sectors of the economy, ranging from
agriculture (where farmers use their mobile phones to know about latest market
prices of their products) to the urban stock market (where speculators are both
physically and mentally entwined with this technology). Members of this all-
dominating technology empire are refashioning the city according to their
requirements and tastes.
Page 8 of 13
Introduction
construction of buildings that are impressive enough for the use of their nouveau
riche clients. They thus reconstitute the spaces in the city in their own image.
(p.12)
Ensconced within their private homes and offices, they may need the road only
for occasional forays into entertainment centres or for adventures that cannot be
provided through the virtual reality of television channels. But their existence
depends on an economy of high productivity and advanced technology—a rather
fragile base that fluctuates with ups and downs in the global economy.13 Will the
road come back again in their living experience?
Roads as Homes
Meanwhile, the present model of refashioning urban space by the corporate–
technocrat–bureaucrat oligarchy is impacting both the labouring poor and the
environment. The implementation of the model involves appropriation of the
lands and homesteads of vast sections of people dependent on agriculture are
deprived of their livelihoods and have to take to the roads. Working in the
various segments of the informal sector, these homeless people inhabit the
margins of the new metropolises, roads being their last refuge where they sleep
every night by putting up temporary shacks of plastic sheets and cardboard
covers supported by bamboo poles, to be dismantled every morning to make way
for pedestrians. According to a survey published in 2010, some 70,000 people
live in such conditions in Calcutta’s pavements.14
The other areas where this model of refashioning urban spaces has had an
impact are environment and urban architecture. The eminent (p.13)
architectural historian Spiro Kostof has drawn our attention to two interesting
factors among others. First, Kostof recalls the history of suburbanization in the
West that was facilitated by land speculation and new modes of transportation
(similar determinants that spur the latest globalized model of urbanization of
greater Kolkata through encroachment on the suburbs—an issue that will be
dealt with at the end of this book). Second, he talks about the impact of
architectural innovations on the landscape of roads, like the rise of skyscrapers
in New York from the 1870s onwards, followed by other cities all over the world.
He discovers tensions between the practice of single buildings planned by
individual families and the design of housing apartment blocks planned by
Page 9 of 13
Introduction
Outside the gated existence of these privileged few, the vast masses still remain
intrinsically joined with the road. The road opens itself up to ever newer
generations of users, who form fresh identities, build new settlements, and
engender different notions of community along the road. At the same time, the
road is not a mere passive recipient of the footprints of successive generations
of travellers and settlers, historical events, and technological innovations. Every
road has a life of its own. It enjoys an autonomy of sorts, interacting with the
local needs of its inhabitants rather than submitting to the rules of urban
planning by a central authority.
The present author prefers to look at the evolution of roads in Calcutta under
the schema of a ‘family’. Following the practice of the homogeneous joint family
(ekannoborti poribar, the Bengali term to describe the tradition of sharing a
common kitchen in old households), the earliest roads can be said to have given
birth to all the streets and lanes, and like grandmothers took under their fold
their descendants—the by-lanes and alleys. These early roads thus became hoary
matriarchs. In Calcutta, one such ancient road is Chitpur Road (known as
Rabindra Sarani today), which has existed as an arterial road from the
precolonial era, when it served as a path for pilgrims travelling from the north to
the Kalighat Temple in the south. Over the years, it has given birth to a host of
lanes and their progeny that twist their ways behind the main thoroughfare. In a
similar fashion, the evolution of the two other longitudinal highways that cut
through Calcutta from the north to the south has been marked by the
Page 10 of 13
Introduction
proliferation of by-lanes and side streets. The first is the Circular Road (its
northern part now renamed Acharya Prafulla Chandra Road, and its southern
end Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road), which was built in the early
nineteenth century by the British administration by covering up a ditch that was
dug in the 1740s by the East India Company to protect Calcutta from Marhatta
invaders. The construction of the (p.15) second road, Central Avenue, began in
the mid-nineteenth century, and today, through a process of gradual expansion,
it has become a full-fledged arterial road, now renamed Chittaranjan Avenue.
Historically, these three roads—Chitpur Road, Circular Road, and Central
Avenue—can be described as the grandmothers of all the streets and lanes that
criss-cross today’s Kolkata.
The present book is a story of three Calcutta roads, which—unlike the three
longitudinal highways—horizontally cut across the city’s topography from the
west to the east. They have been chosen because their intersection with the
three main highways at various points and historical stages has produced
diverse political and socio-economic currents, and led to the growth of
institutions that have shaped the minds of Calcutta’s citizens.
To put it in terms of an extended family, the first road, Bagbazar Street, could be
described as the grandmother, a matriarch spreading her progeny of lanes and
by-lanes. The second, Theatre Road, played the extraneous role of a midwife
bringing to birth a hybrid lifestyle and architecture that bore the signature of
the colonial era. The evolution of the next road, Rashbehari Avenue, can be
likened to the growing up of a middle-class Bengali housewife gingerly stepping
out into the limelight of modern society. By narrating their history, we attempt to
understand the socio-cultural and politico-economic changes in the city since its
birth, through a critical synthesis of micro and macro perspectives that combine
views from both above (official archives) and below (popular perceptions).
The narrative ends with a brief examination of the new stage today in the
urbanization of Calcutta—the city’s expansion into a globalized megalopolis
renamed Kolkata. The two names have been used as interchangeable terms
while narrating the history. Ironically enough, the new urban nomenclature
harks back to the name of the old village Dihi Kolikata, which, along with two
other villages, was bought by the East India Company to be constituted later as
the city of Calcutta. (p.16)
To continue with the concept of the family as a metaphor for the chronicle of its
roads, we can extend it today to an examination of the planning and designing of
the megalopolis and its transportation system (emerging on the north-eastern tip
of the city designated as New Town). It reflects the latest stage of the nuclear
household in the evolution of the family as an institution. Unlike the inclusive
spirit of the extended family system of roads built in the past (like those still
existing in parts of Calcutta that allow space for confrontations as well as
Page 11 of 13
Introduction
It is worth recalling in this connection the observation made some thirty years
ago by the American philosopher Marshall Berman on the history of changes in
the road system in the West:
For most of our century, urban spaces have been systematically designed
and organized to ensure that collisions and confrontations will not take
place here. The distinctive sign of nineteenth-century urbanism was the
boulevard, a medium for bringing explosive material and human forces
together; the hallmark of twentieth-century urbanism has been the
highway, a means for putting them asunder.18
Notes:
(1.) Michail Fragkias, Burak Güneralp, Karen Seto, and Julie Goodness,
‘Typologies of Urbanization Projections, Effects on Land Use, Biodiversity and
Ecosystem Services’, available at http://chm-thai.onep.go.th/chm/city/document/
CBO-scientific/CBO-SAA_Chapter-7_13-Oct-2012.pdf, last accessed on 13 July
2016.
(2.) SETO LAB, Urbanization and Global Change, ‘Forecasting Urban Growth’,
available at Urban.yale.edu/research/theme-3, last accessed on 13 July 2016.
(4.) Hilaire Belloc, The Highway and Its Vehicles (London: The Studio Ltd, 1926),
p. 27.
(6.) Vito Latora quoted in ‘Road Networks Said Urbanization Driver’, 1 March
2012, available at www.upi.com/Science_News/2012/03/01/Road-networks-said-
urbanization-driver/54271330629507/, last accessed 13 July 2016.
(7.) Bagbazar Street, for instance, was a bullock-cart path in the village of
Sutanuti some three hundred years ago, meant for the use of cloth merchants.
Page 12 of 13
Introduction
(8.) David Harvey, Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban
Revolution (London: Verso Books, 2012), p. 5.
(9.) David Harvey, ‘The Urban Process under Capitalism: A Framework for
Analysis’, in The Blackwell City Reader, edited by Gary Bridge and Sophie
Watson (Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2002), pp. 119–20.
(11.) Quoted in The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades
Project by Susan Buck-Morss (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999),
p. 222.
(13.) Saskia Sassen, ‘Globalization and Its Discontents,’ in Bridge and Watson,
Blackwell City Reader.
(17.) Peter Ackroyd, London: The Biography (London: Chatto & Windus, 2000), p.
1.
(18.) Marshall Berman, All That Is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of
Modernity (New York: Penguin Books, 1988), p. 165.
Page 13 of 13
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
Sumanta Banerjee
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199468102.003.0002
Keywords: Colonialism, East India Company, Independence, Sutanuti, Kolikata, Gobindapur, arterial
path, gravel roads
Page 1 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
Page 2 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
Over the next fifty years—from 1706 to 1756—both the town and its streets grew
at a rapid pace. The size of the town increased from 1,692 acres to 3,229 acres,
and the number of streets from two to twenty-seven, along with the creation of
some fifty-two lanes and seventy-four by-lanes. With the influx of entrepreneurs
(like agents engaged in commercial transactions, traders, shopkeepers, and so
on) and manual labourers looking for earning opportunities in the expanding
town, the population grew and so did the houses on either side of these roads
and lanes. From only eight brick-built (described as ‘pucca’ in contemporary
records) houses in 1706, the number rose to 498 in 1756. They were mainly
inhabited by English traders and administrators, who were later joined by
Bengali and other Indian entrepreneurs. As for the labouring classes, they lived
in mud houses with thatched roofs. Their number went up from 8,000 to 14,450
during the fifty-year period under survey.6
The final conquest of Bengal by the British following the Battle of Plassey in
1757 was a turning point in the further expansion of Calcutta and its roads. The
British rulers were now firmly saddled in the fledgling town, and began to
redesign it according to their administrative and political priorities. One of the
first plans was to shift their fort (Fort William, which housed their soldiers) from
the Kolikata part of the town (where it was set up in 1698) to further south, in
the Gobindapur village. This decision was prompted by their bitter experience in
1756, when in June that year Siraj-ud-dowlah, the Nawab of Bengal, attacked
Calcutta and first threatened their fortifications in Sutanuti in the north, and still
later overran Fort William in Kolikata. The northern and central parts of (p.22)
Page 3 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
the town (covering the sites of the old villages of Sutanuti and Kolikata) were,
therefore, no longer considered safe. The East India Company then decided to
develop the southern village of Gobindapur as a township of sorts by installing
their military base (the second Fort William) in the western part, on the banks of
the Hooghly River, and providing residential quarters for the European
inhabitants in the eastern part.
Construction of the new Fort William in the western zone of Gobindapur, on the
banks of the Hooghly, began in 1758 and was completed in 1773. This long
period involved large-scale displacement of the villagers of Gobindapur. The East
India Company gave cash compensation to the Bengali well-to-do families who
owned pucca or brick-built houses in the village, and encouraged them to move
northwards and buy lands and settle in the Sutanuti area. This led to the
development of settlements on either side of the old Chitpur Road and the
creation of new streets and lanes, winding out from behind the main road, where
these newly displaced Bengali families built their houses.7 It was this area in the
north that came to be known as the Black Town in the parlance of the British
colonial authorities as well as European travellers.
As for the poor villagers of Gobindapur who lived in mud huts, they were
removed to the villages of Chourungi and Kalinga on the eastern part for their
resettlement. Here, a group of English traders and entrepreneurs had already
settled down by clearing the jungles, carving out roads and plots for their own
use, and building houses. They had also laid down the base for a major arterial
road, which is known today as Chowringhee Road (deriving its name from the
village of Chourungi). These people needed manual labour to run their
establishments. The East India Company, therefore, resettled the poor villagers
from Gobindapur in this area, where the English residents rented out their spare
plots to the Company for the setting up of slums to accommodate these
labourers. These slums were named after the English owners—like Duncan’s
Bustee, Colvin’s Bustee (‘bustee’, being the indigenous (p.23) term for slum).
The slum-dwellers either worked as domestics in these European households, or
as artisans to cater to their regular needs.
These English and European residents cut up slices of Chourungi and Kalinga
villages into roads and streets. They christened them with their own names, and
according to their living style (for example, Camac Street, Kyd Street, Park
Street, Theatre Road, Elysium Row, and so forth).8 They constituted what came
to be designated as the White Town in the historical narrative of colonial
Calcutta.
Page 4 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
find that in 1776 a sum of 125 rupees was paid to Mr Fortnam, described as a
‘civil architect’, for the purpose of making ‘one water-course in the Chowringhee
Road’ (that is, an open drain).9
But we also come across enterprising English residents who were willing to
volunteer to develop the whole of Calcutta. For instance, a certain Colonel
Campbell inserted a notice in the newspaper Hickey’s Gazette in 1781, where he
made a proposal of ‘cleaning and draining the town, on an estimate of two lacs
of rupees per annum’. Still later, one Mr Henckell cleared considerable portions
of the Sunderban jungles near the town, ‘which greatly contributed to diminish
the local sources of fever’. But it was Marquess Wellesley who in 1799 enlarged
and extended the road system in Calcutta, especially the Circular Road in the
east. This particular arterial road, which linked the north-eastern with the south-
western parts of the town, was considered by the English citizens to be a ‘great
improvement’, although to construct the road, the famous Baithakkhana tree (a
huge tree, which had been the ‘place of assemblage for native merchants from
the earliest period’ and served as an open air baithakkhana or sitting room from
the early eighteenth (p.24) century onwards) was cut down—an act which was
‘looked upon with superstitious regret’ by the Bengali residents.10
Page 5 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
In other words, these Bengali merchants were entrusted with the maintenance
of the arterial road known as Chitpur that ran from the north to the south near
the site of the then Fort William (today’s General Post Office in Dalhousie
Square), or as described in the notification as ‘the highway between the Fort’s
landmark to the norward on the backside [sic] of the town’. (p.25)
The colonial rulers thus recognized the importance of the road as an essential
infrastructure (highways in this case) in the project of urbanization as early as
the beginning of the eighteenth century. In its pursuit of integrating all the
major regions under its control by connecting arteries of communication, the
East India Company was even ready to outsource a public undertaking like road-
building to private individuals like members of the Bengali mercantile
community. Calcutta, therefore, was not ‘chance directed, chance erected’, as
Rudyard Kipling would have us believe in his famous poem on the city.12 On the
contrary, the first generation of British traders-turned-rulers who arrived and
settled in this area soon formulated a deliberate plan to turn it into a full-fledged
city from where they could conduct both their commercial and administrative
operations—for which they needed roads.
The laying down of new roads under the Lottery Committee again resulted in the
dislocation of a large number of people—this time slum-dwellers. In the
Chourungi area for instance, the construction of new roads led to the second
displacement of inhabitants living there. These (p.26) were the people who had
earlier been ousted from their past habitat in the villages of Gobindapur to make
way for the building of Fort William, and had resettled in slums owned by
Englishmen in the late eighteenth century. When the British authorities began to
build new roads in the period between 1820 and 1830, they took possession of
the old slums like Colvin’s Bustee and Duncan’s Bustee, and demolished them to
make way for a wide arterial road stretching from the west on what is the
Page 6 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
modern Chowringhee Road to the Circular Road in the east. This model of slum
clearance was to be followed in other parts of the town also over the next
decades of urbanization.
At this stage of our narrative, we can digress into another avenue in order to
examine the history of roads in Calcutta from a theoretical perspective. The
existing theories of urbanization and road-building—mostly conceptualized by
Western theoreticians and town planners—may often be inadequate to explain
the complexities of urbanization that lay behind the official plan of building of
roads and its subversion by the local underclasses, who carved out lanes and
alleys from these roads in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Calcutta.
When we extrapolate King’s thesis in the Indian situation, we find that the
process of colonial urbanization in India, in certain respects, both departs from
and conforms to King’s theoretical premise. In Calcutta, the British rulers had
completed the first phase of ‘military and political dominance’ by the mid-
Page 7 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
eighteenth century, thus predating the period marked by King as the first stage
in the history of colonial planning of cities. This first stage of urbanization of
Calcutta was marked not only by ‘military and political dominance’, as
emphasized by Anthony King in his thesis, but also by collaboration with the
indigenous traders, as described earlier.
There is a sewered ditch which runs along some houses in Gooptu’s Lane,
which is a lane branching off from Chitpore Road.… There are several
houses abutting on this ditch, which have their drainage connection into
the sewer laid in the ditch.... Mehters [scavengers], servants, (p.29)
mistries [artisans] and other people connected with the houses, use this
sewered ditch, and it is used as a thoroughfare by people who want to
Page 8 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
make a short cut from Gooptu’s Lane where the sewered ditch begins to
Boloram Dey’s Street where it ends.15
Parallel to this popular incursion from the lower orders in road planning in the
northern parts of the town, there was an equally important involvement of a new
generation of Bengali upper and middle classes in the planning of roads in the
southern parts of the town where they settled down in the late 1890s. They
consisted of civil servants and barristers trained in England, as well as teachers,
lawyers, medical practitioners, and engineers who had graduated from the
educational institutions in Calcutta. They stepped out from the confines of their
professional careers to participate in the wider sphere of the national movement
from the 1880s onwards. They demanded the introduction of the very
mechanisms of the bourgeois democratic system that their colonial rulers
followed in their homeland—representation through elections, a voice in the
administration of local affairs through municipalities, and a free press, among
other rights.
The assertion of their demands coincided with the election of the Liberal Party
statesman W.E. Gladstone as prime minister in England, the metropolitan centre
of the colonial regime. His party was willing to grant a few concessions to these
English-educated native subjects of his government, in tune with the principles
of a bourgeois democratic liberal system to which he was wedded. As a result,
the colonial authorities in Calcutta enacted a legislation (Act II [B.C.] of 1888),
which allowed a large number of members of the Bengali upper middle class to
gain entry into the higher echelons of the Calcutta Corporation. Advocates and
educationists like Surendranath Banerjee, Bhupendranath Bose, and Ashutosh
Mukherjee became commissioners of the Corporation. It was through their
efforts that the civic facilities of the Black Town began to improve to some extent
from the end of the nineteenth century. They began to assert themselves in
decision-making in city planning through (p.30) their representation in the city
municipality. They exerted their control, to a limited extent, on the ‘cultural
behavior in public space, and architectural patterns and structures of roads’ (as
defined by King), in the southern-most part of the town, which was being
developed from the later years of the nineteenth century.16
Some, from among these upper middle–class Bengalis bought plots in the
Ballygunge area (which was earlier a suburb of sorts to the south of the main
city), where they set up their homes and built institutions. These settlers
consisted of both the descendants of the old zamindar families of the Black Town
and other parts of Bengal (known as bonedi in Bengali parlance), and the
entrants into the new urban professions (who came to form the ‘bhadralok’
community, in alliance with the bonedi). This resulted in the development of the
hitherto neglected southern suburb as an adjunct to the process of
modernization of the metropolis. It also contributed to the construction of a new
Page 9 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
network of roads and streets in an area that, within a few decades, became a
sort of enclave for this section of Bengali bhadraloks.
Following this initial phase of continuing with the colonial model of town
planning, the Indian ruling class in the twenty-first century has today entered
what King describes as ‘a larger network of global communications and a
situation of economic dependence’.18 Huge megacities, modelled on the world’s
largest megalopolises, are being built on the outskirts of the old metropolitan
cities. Describing this trend as postmetropolis, Edward W. Soja emphasizes its
characteristics: globalization of urban capital, labour, and culture, and the
formation of a new hierarchy of global cities; emergence of new polarizations
and inequalities; and rise of fortress cities and surveillance technologies, among
others.19 We find in north India a typical representation of this phenomenon of
the postmetropolis in Gurgaon on the borders of New Delhi. In east India, in a
similar fashion, the town planners are extending the borders of Calcutta by
creating a megacity in Rajarhat to the north-east of the city (a subject which will
be dealt with in detail towards the end of the book). The global economy
manufactures benefits for the elite residents of these megacities. But the rest of
the citizens face increasing economic stress and cultural alienation. The
postmetropolis, as is being designed by these megacities in today’s India, is a
replication of the colonial model of ‘dependent urbanization’ in a new form,
shaped by the policies and requirements of the neo-liberal global economy,
described as ‘neo-colonial’ by Anthony King. As in the past, it is creating spatial
barriers between one part of the city and another, and socio-economic and
cultural divisions between one section of the citizens and others.
Page 10 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
But roads also acted as cultural barriers. Some of the roads were marked out for
the use of only European residents. Thus, a path was constructed along the
ramparts of the new Fort William that also ran along the banks of the Hooghly
River on which the Fort stood. This path, known as Respondentia Road, offered
the city’s white residents a promenade from where to breathe fresh air. But the
‘black’ residents of the city were debarred from using it. The segregation was
enforced by official orders like the one issued on 7 July 1821 by the British Town
Major of Calcutta, a certain C.T. Higgins: ‘Considerable inconvenience is
experienced by the European community who resort to the respondentia from
the crowds of Native workmen and Coolies who make a thoroughfare of the
Walk.’ Higgins then orders, ‘Natives shall not in future be allowed to pass the
Sluice Bridge … between the hours of 5 and 8 in the morning and 5 and 8 in the
evening.’20
The process of urbanization of Calcutta was thus fractured from its very
beginning. The colonial town planners took care to distribute the racial groups
in two separate zones—in the north and the south, the former known as the
Black Town, where lived the indigenous Bengali and other Indian people, and the
latter as the White Town, where the British and Europeans settled. The two
zones were separated by a thin strip, stretching from Bowbazar in the centre to
Entally in the east, which was mainly inhabited by a mixed group of Chinese,
Jews, Iranians, and Eurasians (later known as Anglo-Indians), among others (see
Map 1.2).
Page 11 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
Notes:
(1.) Manuel Castells, The Urban Question (London: Edwin Arnold, 1977).
(2.) Wilson’s Early Annals, quoted in Ajit Kumar Basu, Kolikatar Rajpath:
Samajey O Sanskrititey (Calcutta: Ananda Publishers Private Ltd, 2008), p. 14.
Page 12 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
(7.) Basu, Kolikatar Rajpath. Describing the ouster of these villagers from
Gobindapur, a later-day census report said: ‘Many thousand huts [were] thrown
into the holes from whence they had been taken, to form roads and an
esplanade.’ (Census of the Town of Calcutta Taken on the 6th April, 1876 by H.
Beverley, C.S. [Calcutta: printed at the Bengal Secretariat Press, 1876].) The
process of clearing villages and jungles went apace all through the eighteenth
century. By the end of that century, the rural acreage of the villages had shrunk
by almost half—from 2,525 acres in 1756 to 1,283 in 1794. (Re: Rama Deb Roy,
Glimpses on the History of Calcutta, 1600–1800 [Calcutta: Socio Economic
Research Institute, 1985].)
(9.) B.V. Roy, Old Calcutta Cameos (Calcutta: Asoka Library, 1946).
(13.) Quoted in P.T. Nair, ed., Calcutta in the 19th Century (Calcutta: Firma KLM
Private Ltd, 1989), p. 513.
(14.) Anthony D. King, Urbanism, Colonialism, and the World Economy (London:
Routledge, 1990).
Page 13 of 14
Colonial and Postcolonial Planning of a City
(17.) The present author remembers how in the early 1950s, a modern shopping
complex called Hindusthan Mart came up on Rashbehari Avenue near its
crossing with Gariahat. Unlike the Gariahat Market a few yards away, which was
a traditional bazaar selling vegetables, fish, and other sundry commodities, this
new mart offered a variety of luxury items and consumer goods that were earlier
available only in the erstwhile White Town—the famous New Market in
Dharmatalla, and the fashionable shops along Chowringhee Road and Park
Street. Today, that site of Hinduthan Mart is occupied by a huge multistoreyed
residential and shopping complex.
(20.) Quoted in Sumanta Banerjee, The Parlour and the Streets: Elite and
Popular Culture in Nineteenth Century Calcutta (Calcutta: Seagull, 1989), p. 23.
(21.) Nair, Calcutta in the 19th Century; and Salil Sarkar, Theaterer Kolkata
(Calcutta: Mitra O Ghosh Publishers, 1999). According to the historian Partha
Chatterjee: ‘There never were clear rules of segregation of White and Black
areas in Calcutta.… In the 19th century, there were no laws that prevented
anyone from acquiring property anywhere in the city or from living anywhere.’
He adds, however, that ‘an effective system of segregation did operate’, by
explaining that ‘segregation was more the result of regulations of various
economic and public activities’. (Quoted by Howard Spodek in ‘City Planning in
India under British Rule’, Economic and Political Weekly 48, no. 4 [26 January
2013].)
Page 14 of 14
A Tale of Three Towns
Sumanta Banerjee
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199468102.003.0003
Keywords: north Calcutta, central Calcutta, south Calcutta, Black Town, White Town, administrators,
merchants, middle class
1. A minority of rich Bengalis who had made money as agents of the East
India Company (known as mutsuddis) for its commercial activities in the
Page 1 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
The earlier generation of commercial agents and revenue collectors built palatial
mansions on the main roads of the Black Town, and garden (p.38) houses on
the banks of the Hooghly River. One early nineteenth-century English observer,
W. Hamilton, described them as ‘great native families who contributed to
Calcutta’s splendor … (but) were of very recent origin … (from among whom)
scarcely ten could be named who possessed wealth before the rise of English
power, it having been accumulated under our sovereignty, chiefly in our
service’.1 By the early nineteenth century, however, their fortunes were on the
decline. Hamilton pointed out at the state of their houses: ‘ruinous and decayed
premises, either vacant, or occupied by the remnants of wealthy families’.
Explaining the decline of these old rich Bengali families of the Black Town,
contemporary English observers conjectured: ‘The mercantile adventurers of
Calcutta had retired to spend their wealth in other quarters and ... the old and
indigent habitants of the place had not been able to preserve their former
station.’2
Even after some three decades, the state of these descendants of the former
Bengali grandees described above had not changed. An English missionary
visiting Calcutta in the late 1860s described the houses of the rich in the Black
Town in these words: ‘Scattered over the city … are the family mansions of the
native gentry, with their broad central courts, their pillared verandahs, and
numerous rooms. Some are palaces in appearance, though surrounded by filthy
drains; others are badly out of repair, their walls eaten with salt petre, their
courts full of cast-away furniture and heaps of rubbish, or overgrown with huge
weeds; and threatening to tumble into ruins.’3
It is no wonder that this English visitor found the houses of the ‘native gentry’ in
such a dilapidated condition. By the mid-nineteenth century, these Bengali
families of the ‘native gentry’, which had amassed fortunes in the eighteenth
century through deals with the East India Company, had already lost their
wealth and power. First, these members of an informal sector were no longer of
any use to the colonial administrative system that had succeeded the East India
Company and had laid down formal rules for both commercial and (p.39)
administrative functions. The new rulers had trained functionaries from among a
Page 2 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
new generation of Bengalis (through their schools and colleges) to man their
commercial institutions as clerks, and administer the rural economy as junior
officials (entrusted with the task of collecting revenue and looking after law and
order). Second, the descendants of the eighteenth-century Bengali grandees
themselves were in no position to retain their status in the face of new
challenges. They were ill-qualified to fit into the new capitalist system. Most of
them dissipated the wealth accumulated by their forefathers through an
inherited extravagant feudal lifestyle (for example, spending their money on
lavish parties, maintaining mistresses, or gambling on horse races). By the mid-
nineteenth century, therefore, they were reduced to penury, their mansions
looking like moth-eaten structures.
How did these ‘babus’ live in the lanes and by-lanes behind the main roads in the
Black Town of the nineteenth century? We come across a meticulously written
description of the houses that they built by a perceptive contemporary European
observer, who found them
Page 3 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
Neither the main roads in the Black Town (where stood the mansions of the rich
Bengalis), nor the streets and lanes behind them (where the poor lived), were in
any usable shape. Writing in 1836, Lieutenant Abercrombie, who held office as
Superintendent of Conservancy, described the abominable road conditions in the
northern part of the city: ‘There are at present no effectual means in use for
putting the streets into a proper state of cleanliness and preserving them in
such. Dust, rubbish and all kinds of dirt are thrown into the streets ad libitum
from every house, to be picked up as may be when the carts … (only about 300
carts to serve the whole town) may happen to come round.’ The roads were
rendered even worse by the drainage system. The only drains were deep open
ditches running alongside the roads, which were always full of filth and stinking
matter. Describing the drains in the Black Town, Lieutenant Abercrombie said:
‘They were unpaved.… In some places the bottom of the drain was nearly 2 ft.
below its supposed out-let, so that the deposit of filth, consisting chiefly of the
Page 4 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
A vivid description of the sanitary conditions in the Black Town is available from
another contemporary account, which draws our attention to the role of
‘mehtars’ or scavengers in cleaning the roads:
The larger houses possessed private privies, while the poorer classes, who
lived in huts, sometimes shared one privy between four or five huts, and
sometimes resorted to the ‘mehtar-tatties,’ or public necessaries, which
instead of being municipal property, were built and managed by private
enterprises, fees being charged for their use.… The night soil, collected
from private privies by mehtars, who were paid fees by the occupiers of
the premises was conveyed to depots called ‘tollah mehtars’ depots,’ which
were situated at convenient centres. It was then removed to the night-soil
ghat on the river bank near the Mint, carried downstream in boats hired by
the Municipality on the contract system, and thrown into the river.7
Some thirty years after Abercrombie’s report, the first census of Calcutta was
carried out in 1866 by a committee headed by V.H. Schalch. It estimated that
there were 438 roads and lanes in Calcutta, out of which 253 were in the Black
Town with a length of 3,50,083 feet. They were so narrow, Schalch pointed out,
that traffic could not move smoothly. Besides, he warned, that the concentration
of combustible industries like jute mills, shops selling paints, oil mills, and soap
manufacturing units along these roads and lanes posed a danger to the citizens,
as no fire engine could enter these alleys, and no tanks or ponds were situated
nearby to make water available.8 A British traveller passing through Calcutta
during that period gives a vivid description of the living style and conditions of
the Bengali citizens of the Black Town, which occupied nearly 6 square miles of
the entire city (then comprising 8 square miles):
The streets, roads, and lanes are narrow, and are overshadowed by the
lofty walls and verandahs of straggling family dwellings.… All the great
roads and streets, destitute of pavements, are lined with shops, which are
innocent of glass fronts and windows; and which exhibit, without (p.43)
protection from dust, piles of brass vessels, bundles of slippers and shoes,
gorgeous tin lanterns, bales of cloth, mats, stool and cane chairs; vast piles
of red pottery, pitchers, cups and cooking pots; leaf umbrellas; and hillocks
of bamboos; posts for houses, small tiles, and straw.9
As for the domestic existence of these inhabitants of the underbelly of the Black
Town, the British traveller provides us with an insight into their living style and
habits. Describing the pressure on urban space, he observed: ‘So precious has
space become in recent years, that almost all vacant land outside the gardens of
the better houses has been covered with common huts. Of these the city now
Page 5 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
contains over sixty thousand. Formerly they were made of light materials, were
walled with mats, and thatched with leaves or straw.’ But the great fires which
burned three thousand of them every year led to the implementation of a public
law that required them to be roofed with tiles. How did these inhabitants of the
newly refurbished huts live? To quote the British traveller: ‘Though more
substantial in make, they are huts still. Most of them consist of but a single
room, and contains a bed-stead, a huge chest, a lamp or two, bamboo or glass oil
bottles, and a miscellaneous collection of pots and pans.’10
The state of the Black Town roads and lanes deteriorated further over the next
two decades. A report prepared by the Health Officer of the Calcutta
Corporation in 1887 described in grim colours the ‘close, narrow and ill-
ventilated streets … in the northern and native portion of the town’. The official
pointed out that localities which were crowded fifty years ago had become still
more densely crowded because of new buildings which had been erected during
this period. As a result, the air was polluted, for the purification of which ‘the
sweeping force of a storm is required to penetrate into the numerous narrow
lanes, passages, nooks, crevices and gullies which intersect the more crowded
districts’.11
The report also described the impact of such a congested atmosphere on the
health of those inhabiting these ‘nooks, crevices and gullies’. (p.44) They
suffered more in terms of mortality rates compared to the citizens of the White
Town. While the mean death rate in the European quarter was 14.6, in the Black
Town it was 28–35. Explaining the high mortality rates, a Bengali physician who
treated patients in the Black Town slums attributed them to ‘bad hygienic
conditions under which the poor sufferers live in ill-ventilated over-crowded
rooms, coupled with the insanitary conditions … where the privies open on the
road side admitting the free admixture of the sewer gas with the atmosphere
already surcharged with the effluvia emanating from the … deposit of house
refuse; the contamination of well water with suspended sewage’.12 Epidemics
were quick to break out and spread to the rest of the city from these slums.
Page 6 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
The danger of such conflagration was not confined to the Black Town. There
were slums in the White Town also, which were inhabited by the Indian servants
of the European residents. We come across a Bengali newspaper report of a fire
that broke out in ‘Bamun Bustee’ in the neighbourhood of Theatre Road on 27
March 1821, which started from a hut occupied by a servant of a certain Mr
George Watt, and spread fast.15
But those who built their homes in the bustees were not owners of these plots
where they built up their shacks. These plots belonged to landlords (like the rich
Bengali residents of the Black Town, and the European settlers in the White
Town, or middle-class traders and businessmen) who rented out their land in
small plots to different tenants for building purposes. Neither the Bengali nor
the white landlords were concerned about the well-being of the residents of their
slums as long as their rents were duly collected. The rich and middle-class
households did not care either, as long as these slum-dwellers continued to serve
them as their domestic helps. In the absence of any humanitarian concern on the
Page 7 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
part of the civic authorities for the residential requirements of these manual
workers, they were forced to build little mud huts for themselves. Besides
suffering from such existential problems, the bustee dwellers were also denied
political rights. Till the early twentieth century, neither the hut owner nor its
occupant was entitled to vote in municipality elections.
First, the British rulers were seriously concerned about their own physical
health, and the dangers of contamination from the Black Town, which was
perceived as a den of all diseases, from where the northern wind blew and
infected the White Town in the south. They suffered from what a modern-day
historian describes as ‘sanitation syndrome’—a term used with reference to
colonial planning in South Africa.17 As Anthony D. King points out in his analysis
of urban planning under colonial regime: ‘The overriding, even obsessive
concern with “health” … was … taken as the driving force behind planning in all
colonial territories. The creation of physically “healthy” environments, defined
according to the cultural criteria of the metropolitan power, became a major
objective.’18 Thus, a ‘physicalist’ strategy based on sheer rearrangement of
space and dispersal of its inhabitants to sanitize the environment was
formulated by the Calcutta municipal authorities to bypass problems that were
essentially economic, social, and political. The demolition of a crowded slum and
the creation of an open-air garden in its place fitted well into this strategy of
purifying the Black Town. In fact, as early as 1836, Lieutenant Abercrombie, the
then Superintendent of Conservancy for Calcutta, recommended the formation
of streets that could lead to the opening up of crowded localities and secure
‘free ventilation’ so that the wind which blew from the Black Town in the north
could be detoxicated. Besides, the policy to reduce the congestion in the
northern part of the town was also motivated by the British rulers’ need to keep
Page 8 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
Second, environmental reforms like setting up of gardens and naming them after
white rulers in the heart of the Black Town served the twin objectives of
stamping the space with symbols of colonial authority, and also pleasing the
upwardly mobile Bengali professionals and middle-class inhabitants by offering
them a space for leisure. Such ‘strategic beautification’ of portions of the Black
Town allowed its native (p.48) residents to relax in open air within the
precincts of their own territory, and debarred them from invading the
promenades in the White Town like the Eden Gardens and the strand along the
Hooghly River.19
Among other areas in the Black Town where the slum population was affected by
road-building in the 1880s, were Jorasanko, where bustees were razed to make
way for the creation of several streets; Kolutola, where municipal authorities
took possession of a large bustee to evict their dwellers in order to construct a
hospital on that site; and Muchipara, where the site of a bustee was taken over
to construct a building to house a social institution. In the White Town, Duncan’s
bustee, which was situated in Wood Street, was pulled down to build the office of
the Surveyor General. This meant the second displacement for its inhabitants
who, after having been ousted from Gobindapur (due to the construction of Fort
William there, as mentioned earlier), had been rehabilitated in this bustee.20
By the turn of the twentieth century, more bustees had been demolished, partly
with the consent of their upper-class Bengali owners, who were compensated
with money for the loss of their regular income from the rents paid by their
tenants who inhabited the bustees. An official report describes how these
owners removed all huts in ‘Natherbagan bustee … Soortibagan bustee ...
Tantibagan bustee’, where ‘the owners … have removed all the huts and
constructed masonry buildings’.21 A few years later, the Calcutta Corporation
was empowered with the right to remove bustees for the purpose of building or
widening roads, without payment of any compensation whatsoever to the
owners.22
Company and the new class of professionals like advocates, teachers, medical
practitioners, and bureaucrats and clerks in the administrative hierarchy. Even
at the turn of the twentieth century, they were all bundled up in the stereotype
of ‘babus’ by the contemporary European observers. They were denigrated in
the Kiplinesque style, in the contemporary accounts by Englishmen in
newspapers and other writings. A typical illustration is a snippet from a
travelogue by an Englishman in the early twentieth century. He begins by
admitting that he has ‘followed in Kipling’s footsteps, and … smelt the Big Stink
of which he wrote so geographically’. He then proceeds to describe the lifestyle
of the ‘babu’ who works ‘all day in his two-foot section of desk behind the brass
rails of a busy bank or office … [and] is wide awake at night enjoying himself in
the haunts of his class’. The haunt is the red-light area in Upper Chitpore
(‘perhaps the most Indian of Calcutta’s streets’), where ‘babus of all shapes and
sizes … from the long and lanky to the squat figure that looks like a Crème de
Menthe bottle’ congregated.
The English visitor then sums up: ‘Ninety percent or more of the clerks in
Calcutta thus disport themselves in the charms of femininity, working by day,
revelling by night, and rearing families in their spare time.’23
This typical colonial view of the Bengali middle class of the Black Town fails, as
usual, to look deeper under the surface. At the time when this Englishman was
sneering at ‘babus’, a mood of discontent and protest against colonial rule was
also simmering among the same ‘babu’ class. While some among them did
indulge in the hedonistic lifestyle described above, others were organizing
public meetings to demand political rights within the existing system; some
among them even (p.50) going a step further by resorting to armed resistance
to put an end to the colonial system altogether.
In fact, the educated Bengali middle class of the Black Town, which was a
product of the colonial system, also bred within its womb the forces that
challenged the system. One of the ironies of a hegemonist English educational
system (that was introduced in the Black Town in the nineteenth century by the
colonial rulers to serve their interests) was that while creating a subservient
class of Bengali clerks, petty bureaucrats, and professionals, it unwittingly led to
the growth of a subversionist grouping within the same class that rebelled
against the colonial powers. Thus, in the Black Town, institutions like the Hindu
College (a joint endeavour by English colonial educationalists and Bengali upper-
class social reformers) produced a generation of intellectual dissidents in the
early nineteenth century (for example, the Young Bengal group), who can be
described as the precursors of the next generation of Bengali nationalist
politicians, who in the twentieth century emerged as a force to challenge the
colonial rulers. Educated in the values of Western Enlightenment that were
spread through this system, they questioned the credibility of colonial power in
the terms of a discourse that was set by that power itself. These Bengali middle-
Page 10 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
It was in the streets and halls of the Black Town that public rallies and meetings
were held against draconian laws that imposed censorship and violated political
rights, Bengali plays were staged that lampooned the city’s colonial
administrators, and secret revolutionary groups hatched plots to overthrow the
British regime by armed onslaught.
The English with their shops, shipping servants and dependents, their
banians, brokers and traders, who were most rapidly increasing in number,
lay scattered, in spite of concentration of the factors and soldiers in and
around Fort William, over the whole of this area in straggling houses and
boat … it was becoming more and more difficult to deal with them in the
best interests of the Company.24
Besides, the existing town was attracting a new group of Europeans. Another
modern historian of Calcutta points out that the success of the English in the
Battle of Plassey encouraged ‘a growing number of unlicensed Englishmen … to
find their way to Bengal.… Spurred by the examples of the Nabobs [the first
generation of East India Company merchants and administrators who made
fortunes in India and returned to England where they flaunted their wealth in
the early 18th century] more and more began to reach Bengal’.25 These
‘unlicensed Englishmen’ consisted of sailors who jumped ships, soldiers who
deserted the army, wanted criminals who escaped from London, and a variety of
adventurers who flocked to this town seeking ways to make fortunes. The
English settlement was bursting at its seams.
The East India Company, therefore, had to extend its territory beyond the
prevailing borders. As luck would have it, their old patron, the Moghul prince
Farrukshiyar (who granted them the permission to buy the three villages of
Sutanuti, Kolikata, and Gobindapur in 1698), captured the Moghul throne in
Delhi in 1713. The East India Company approached him for permission to
expand their territory by buying villages neighbouring their old settlement in
Calcutta. In 1717, Farrukshiyar granted them the right to buy thirty-eight
villages in and around Calcutta. But the local zamindars of these villages refused
to sell them.26 Over the next (p.52) decades, however, the Company got
Page 11 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
possession of the villages through devious means. It employed its agents and
brokers to twist the hands of these zamindars and make them concede.
According to a latter-day British official—Mr Bolts, the Collector of Calcutta—
these servants and brokers of the Company ‘realized whatever rents and profits
they could get, and omitted to pay the Government revenue, which however, was
exacted from the old, but dispossessed zamindars.’27
Among these villages were Chourungi, Birji, and Kalimba (or Kalinga) in the
south-eastern part of the area. The English and European settlers (mainly
administrators and traders) encroached upon them and carved out a space for
their own exclusive use. In this new phase of the urbanization of these villages in
the early eighteenth century, these European settlers built houses and roads that
suited their movements and convenience. Thus, a new urban spatial structure
was constructed through the rearrangement of public and private spaces, and
connectivity and accessibility were made possible by the creation of roads and
lanes. Very soon, these European settlements, which stretched from the
neighbourhood of Fort William in the west to the Chowrungi-Birji area of the
east, became institutionalized as a separate enclave known as the White Town.
The European population carved out the White Town as their own exclusive
zone, where they implanted town planning theory, ideology, and professional
knowledge, which they borrowed from the metropolitan centre of London in
Britain. In these enclaves, they constructed wide roads and avenues, built
British-type cottages, and laid out gardens experimenting with tropical flora.
The streets are broad: the line of buildings surrounding two sides of the
esplanade of the fort, is magnificent; and it adds greatly to the superb (p.
53) appearance, that the houses are detached from each other, and
insulated in a great space. The buildings are all on a large scale, from the
necessity of having a free circulation of air.… The general approach to the
houses is by a flight of steps, with great projecting porticoes, or
surrounded by colonnades or arcades, which gave them the appearance of
Grecian Temples.28
The Grecian architectural façade of houses and gardens in the domestic sphere,
and wide roads and promenades in the public sphere, remained a model of living
style also for later generations of European residents of the White Town. In the
1830s, an English observer described their houses as marked by a ‘style of
building (which) is Grecian, ornamented with spacious verandahs, the pillars of
which are generally too lofty to afford much protection from the sun’s rays’. He
Page 12 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
added: ‘Each house has a piece of garden around, which gives to this quarter
[European] … a great advantage in point of airiness.’29 Some thirty years later,
we find from another contemporary report the following description of the White
Town:
The English quarter occupies the south end of the city. Here a beautiful
plain, a mile and a half long goes down to the water’s edge, having Fort
William in the centre, on the river bank.… On its inner sides the plain is
bordered with the stately houses of the English, with their white walls,
broad, open verandahs, and green Venetian shutters.… On the east side
are the numerous English homes of ‘Chowringhee,’ always increasing both
in number and in their rents.30
The ‘beautiful plain’ is what came to be known as the Maidan—the lungs of the
city. Once a deep jungle, it was later cleared (in 1830–40) and turned into a
pasture and grazing ground. Still later, the British administrators began to
develop the stretch as an open space for the recreation of white citizens by
planting trees and creating spots of quiet retreat—on the lines of Hyde Park and
similar English sites of open-air exercise and leisure. By the 1860s, it had been
given recognition in official records as the Maidan, and suggestions were being
made for (p.54) the ‘improvement of the Maidan … [since] the increase of
European population demands corresponding means to provide for the
recreation of the community.’31
The growth and development of the Black Town reflected these tensions. The
Bengali landlords and other residents who settled here in the late eighteenth to
early nineteenth centuries allowed it to develop along the old pattern of villages
from where they had emigrated. As in their villages, where people huddled
together in huts rubbing shoulders with each other, sharing common concerns,
in north Calcutta too in the early days of its growth, houses cropped up side by
side, often without any boundary wall. Again, following the old joint-family
system, a single building accommodated numerous wings of the owner’s
extended family. This cluttered-up native housing pattern, which persisted all
through the nineteenth century in the Black Town, posed a challenge to British
colonial town planning, which lay stress on the separation of individual
Page 13 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
residential units—as followed in the White Town with its European bungalows
detached from each other by patches of empty space. The problem was posed in
vivid terms by a British official, H. Beverley, who while carrying out an on-the-
spot survey of the Black Town in 1876, observed: (p.55)
Bengali owners of some of these traditional bazaars of the Black Town faced a
crisis when English administrators and entrepreneurs encroached upon their
commercial space on the borders of the Black and White Towns in central
Calcutta towards the end of the nineteenth century. Thus, the descendants of the
famous businessman Motilal Sheel, who owned an old bazaar in the
Chowringhee–Dharmatala area, (p.56) protested when in 1873 the British
administrators decided to build a modern market next to it, named after their
patron, Sir Stuart Hogg, who was the city’s commissioner of police as well as its
municipal commissioner. The Sheel family, however, agreed to give up their
claims to the commercial space by accepting 60,000 rupees as compensation
from the British administrators.33
Page 14 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
Hogg Market (known today as New Market) and similar other markets that came
up in the White Town stood in sharp contrast with the bazaars of the
contemporary Black Town. In these new markets, a different class of indigenous
retailers rented well-structured shops, bought goods from the wholesale market
in north Calcutta, and sold them to their main clients, the European residents.
Quite a number of European and Jewish traders also set up their shops in Hogg
Market, some of which still survive.
In rural Bengal, bullock carts were the traditional mode of transport, both for
the movement of freight and travellers. The rich used palanquins carried by
human bearers. For faster travelling, the paiks and barkandazes (armed
mercenaries) of the zamindars rode horses. In the urban mileu of Calcutta in the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, palanquins and horse-driven carriages
were used by the upper-class Bengalis in the Black Town and the Europeans in
the White Town. The European painter F. Balthazar Solvyns, visiting Calcutta in
the late eighteenth century, described the palanquin as well constructed, with
(p.57) lanterns, and borne by four bearers whose movements were so easy that
‘they are scarcely felt by the person in the palanquin, though they are at the
same time very rapid and get over a great deal of ground in a short time’.34 The
bearers kept shifting the palanquin—one group succeeded by another on a long
stretch. A contemporary Englishwoman, Sophia Goldbourne, narrating her
journey to the promenade of Esplanade in Calcutta, wrote: ‘Swiftly did we pass
along; for it seems these palanquin-bearers (with proper relays ...) are so expert
that in defiance of the heat, etc. they go at the rate of from nine to twelve miles
per hour.’35 But the common citizens could not afford palanquins. As one latter-
day historian of Calcutta observed:
The next important mode of transport was the hackney carriage. A mid-
nineteenth-century official report describes three types of such carriages in
Calcutta: (a) four-wheeled carriage on springs, drawn by two horses; (b) a
similar carriage drawn by one horse or a pair of ponies; and (c) a two-wheeled
carriage without springs.37 Although palanquins gradually disappeared from the
Page 15 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
But the most curious technology was mooted by a British contractor firm called
Messrs Gladston Wyllie. It had investments in logging (p.59) operations, and in
order to profit from the wood thus extracted from forests, it submitted a
proposal to the municipal authorities in 1902–3 to pave the city roads with
wooden planks that had a cement covering. But two other Englishmen, the chief
Page 16 of 33
A Tale of Three Towns
engineer and the health officer of the Calcutta Corporation, raised objections.
They pointed out that a similar experiment had been earlier carried out on some
London roads, and it had been found that in summer the wooden planks rotted
and gave out an offensive smell, as a result of which those roads had to be
washed with deodorant! In Calcutta, what with the summer heat, such wooden
roads would give out an even worse stink!40
It is evening and it is drizzling.… But the road has already become a mud
puddle, as if a sweetmeat seller had poured all his rotten curd on a plate.…
The pavements are also bumpy and slippery.… Further down, a sewerage
pipe has burst … so you have to take a diversion.… But there again, you
find that there is some problem with the pavement gas light posts.… So,
the gas company labourers are digging up the road.
The letter ends with an appeal to the Calcutta Municipality: ‘Please, please …
find some means to reduce the tyrannies of the road.’43
Apart from the poor maintenance of the surface of the roads, the underground
drainage and sewerage system also created problems (more dangerous than the
frequent bursting of the pipes, as described in the above letter). Lack of proper
supervision of the numerous details of the drainage machinery, beginning from
its construction, laying, trapping ventilation, flushing, and so forth, often left it
vulnerable to the leakage of sewer gas. A late nineteenth-century English health
Page 17 of 33
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of L'héritage
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States
and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where
you are located before using this eBook.
Title: L'héritage
roman
Language: French
L’HÉRITAGE
ROMAN
PARIS
BERNARD GRASSET, ÉDITEUR
61, RUE DES SAINTS-PÈRES, 61
1914
Tous droits de reproduction, de traduction et d’adaptation réservés pour tous pays.
Copyright by Bernard Grasset 1914.
DU MÊME AUTEUR
René.
PREMIÈRE PARTIE
C’est son premier voyage, qui n’en finira peut-être jamais. Après
le train, une voiture, non plus la bonne diligence où l’on est assis
entre des gens du pays, mais un char-à-bancs où l’on se serre, qui
ressemble à une voiture de boucher. Il suit des rues, puis une longue
route plantée d’arbres.
C’est une après-midi d’Octobre où les rayons du soleil n’ont point
la force de venir jusque sur la terre : ils s’arrêtent très haut dans
l’air, au-dessus du vent qui a le champ libre. Il n’aura plus pour se
moquer du vent le coin du feu. La cheminée ne lui offrira plus, pour
l’abriter, son manteau.
Sur le même banc, sur le banc d’en face, d’autres enfants sont
assis qui portent déjà l’uniforme : casquette à visière vernie, veste à
boutons dorés. Ils sont heureux de se retrouver.
Pour lui, ce n’est pas « la rentrée » qu’il faut dire, mais
« l’entrée ». Il avance dans l’inconnu dont il a peur. Comme un croisé
sur la route de Jérusalem, il tressaille dès qu’il aperçoit entre les
arbres une grande maison couverte d’ardoises. S’il n’était pas si
hésitant il demanderait : « Est-ce que nous arrivons ? » avec la
crainte que ce fût déjà la pension.
Il faut pourtant que les chevaux s’arrêtent.
Jetés pêle-mêle à l’entrée de la cour, jusque sous le trapèze, des
malles, des caisses, des colis de toutes formes. Ici un édredon que
l’on devine, là une paire de sabots ficelés sur le couvercle d’une
malle. Cela vient de tous les coins du département. Il se promène
entre ces caisses et ces malles, cherchant les siennes du coin de
l’œil. Si elles étaient perdues ? Il les découvre au pied d’un arbre. Il
s’assoit. La tête lui tourne. Il se rappelle ; c’est comme s’il voyait tout
ce que sa malle contient de menus objets que sa mère a voulu qu’il
emporte.
Voici deux caisses qui renferment l’une des provisions, l’autre une
partie de l’humble trousseau ; voici dans un sac de calicot le petit
édredon fait exprès pour lui. Il voudrait pouvoir fermer les yeux,
s’endormir là pour longtemps au milieu de tout ce qu’il lui reste de
son pays, de sa maison. Mais il faut qu’il voie auprès de lui dans la
cour, qu’il entende traversant avec bruit les couloirs et montant des
escaliers, d’autres enfants, des élèves qui seront peut-être
méchants. Il faut qu’il voie beaucoup de fenêtres dont aucune n’a de
rideaux : dans les villages c’est seulement chez les misérables que
les fenêtres sont sans rideaux. Par delà la cour que limite une
terrasse les cimes des arbres d’un bosquet qui dévale vers une
plaine immense, vers un horizon où fument de noires usines.
C’est un soir d’Octobre, un soir de fin de vacances où, lorsqu’il
était encore « là-bas », il rentrait à la maison. Un feu clair pétillait
entre les chenets. L’angélus tintait dans la brume. Il se
recroquevillait heureux, parcouru d’un frisson à penser à ceux qui
s’en allaient sur les routes parmi le brouillard et le vent, à ces petits
qui fatigués s’assoient sur des talus en pleurant. Plusieurs ne
rentraient pas chez eux, parce qu’ils n’avaient pas de maison, ou
bien ils en étaient partis depuis tant de jours qu’il leur faudrait
marcher beaucoup avant de la retrouver. Aujourd’hui c’est lui qui,
comme un enfant égaré, songe douloureusement.
Il vivait dans l’espace, loin des villages dont l’unique rue est un
chemin bordé de chaumières qui n’ont ni le temps de se nettoyer, ni
l’argent nécessaire pour se soigner ; aussi sont-elles bien malades.
On hésite entre deux portes presque semblables et, croyant entrer
dans la chaumière, c’est dans l’écurie que l’on pénètre. A l’écurie il
n’y a personne. L’âne travaille dur et la vache est aux champs ; loin
de la petite ville où un peu avant midi le quartier de l’église
d’habitude silencieux s’anime. Des laveuses rentrent le tablier
trempé. Elles laissent leur porte grande ouverte, rapprochent les
tisons dans la cheminée, ou bien allument leurs fourneaux. Elles
viennent au puits et s’en retournent, leur seau plein, avec un
balancement de leur bras inoccupé.
Il vivait dans le temps, hors des histoires que les femmes se
racontent sur le pas des portes : des Letourneur qui ont des dettes
partout, à qui si cela continue le boucher refusera de la viande et le
boulanger du pain ; du père Papon qui ne peut plus marcher qu’avec
deux béquilles et qui n’ira pas loin maintenant ; du gamin des
Clergot qui fait les quatre cent dix-neuf coups à Paris.
Il vivait dans ses rêves, dans sa solitude. Qu’eût-il fait d’argent
pendant ses vacances ? Il ne fumait pas, n’allait pas au café.
C’étaient les deux seuls plaisirs coûteux et possibles dans cette
petite ville où il n’y avait pas de place pour un théâtre. A peine si
une fois l’an deux chanteuses inévitablement comiques donnaient
une soirée au Café de Paris. Elles partaient le lendemain matin ;
peut-être même ne se couchaient-elles pas.
A dix-huit ans la vie lui paraissait aussi simple qu’une route à
suivre depuis longtemps tracée. Ce n’est pas en vain qu’il s’était
développé dans le triple isolement d’une famille qui ne voit pas plus
loin que sa maison ; d’un collège enfoui entre des arbres dans le
calme d’une province où des maîtres indolents ne se soucient point
de diriger les enthousiasmes précoces ; d’une petite ville qui ne voit
pas plus loin que son horizon de montagnes et ne s’occupe pas de la
bataille des idées à Paris où croit-elle toutes les portes s’ouvrent
d’elles-mêmes devant les jeunes bacheliers.
Il n’avait pas de but. Lorsque rêvant d’amour il s’essayait à écrire
des vers, il se voyait à Paris, logeant sous les tuiles dans une
mansarde étroite mais claire. Devant la fenêtre flottaient aux soirs
de Juin des plantes grimpantes ; l’hiver assis près de son poêle
rouge, il regardait le ciel gris. Il fréquentait des poètes, des artistes ;
tous portaient les cheveux longs.
Bachelier il aurait pu continuer ses études ; mais cela eût coûté
trop cher. Son père l’avait mené jusqu’au haut de la côte en
soufflant : il était à bout de forces.
Il avait maintenant, disait-on, tout ce qu’il fallait pour réussir. Il
ne lui restait plus qu’à se lancer dans la vie. Mais il devait d’abord
passer par la caserne.
C’était une ville de trente mille âmes où la caserne est reléguée à
l’extrémité d’un faubourg. Il se dirigea vers elle, sa légère valise à la
main. Il était trois heures d’une après-midi d’Octobre. Un vent froid
soulevait des restes de poussière de l’été et faisait tomber les
dernières petites feuilles des acacias plantés le long de la voie
ferrée. Le soleil pâle rougeoyait sur les vitres de quelques maisons.
Vaneau marchait sans enthousiasme, comme un bœuf piqué pour la
première fois par le dur aiguillon de la vie. D’un seul coup d’œil il
embrassa les trois grands corps de bâtiments à cinq étages, percés
de centaines de fenêtres. D’autres locaux moins importants
s’apercevaient de-ci de-là. La cour lui parut immense. Il n’y poussait
pas un brin d’herbe.
Vaneau portait bottines, veston et chapeau de paille. Un feutre
eût convenu davantage au commencement d’Octobre, mais c’était
un vieux chapeau dont la paille avait jauni comme les feuilles mortes
et qu’il jetterait. Devant le poste de police des gradés, les mains
dans les poches de leurs pantalons rouges, fumaient et ricanaient en
dévisageant ce « civil » imberbe dont le veston jaunâtre ne valait pas
une bonne blouse. Il entra dans une chambrée vers quatre heures
du soir à l’époque où les doux rêveurs marchent mélancoliques
parmi les feuilles mortes. Six ans auparavant presque jour pour jour
il était assis sous le trapèze, la poitrine gonflée de sanglots. Il vit les
lits rectangulaires à couvertures brunes, les hauts paquetages
protégés par des mouchoirs bordés de rouge, les équipements
accrochés à la tête des lits, et le râtelier d’armes où tous les fusils
avaient exactement les mêmes dimensions.
A l’arrivée des bleus il vit la caserne transformée en caravansérail
où se rencontraient des hommes qui parlaient des patois fort
différents. Ils venaient avec des valises de tous prix et des baluchons
de toutes formes, avec des souliers à lacets, des bottines à boutons
et des sabots sans lacets ni boutons, avec des chapeaux melons, des
chapeaux mous, des casquettes « cycliste » et des casquettes de
vrais paysans, avec des blouses, des vestons, des pardessus, effarés
ou crâneurs, silencieux ou bruyants, grands et petits, maigres et
gras, bruns, blonds, roux, s’éparpillant, ondulant pour se rassembler
à des commandements dont ils devinaient le sens, happés par des
hommes de garde, par des fourriers, par des « pays » qui
cherchaient à les reconnaître.
Il vécut là des jours de corvées, d’exercices, de nourriture rance,
de lavages de loques dans des eaux sursaturées de savon bon
marché. Les autres, joyeux, se bousculaient sur les lits, astiquaient
avec ferveur, entouraient de plus de soins leur fusil que leur propre
corps, paysans venus de Saintonge et d’Auvergne avec des têtes
carrées et des fronts étroits. En bourgerons sales dont leur torse et
leurs bras avaient pris l’habitude, ils jouaient aux cartes le soir,
accroupis ou, lorsqu’ils avaient reçu de l’argent, traversaient la nuit
de la grande cour pour aller boire un litre à la cantine en fumant des
pipes. Nul doute que les gamins des villages avec qui jadis il avait
fréquenté l’école, ne dussent, sonnés leur vingt et un ans, vivre des
jours pareils dans des casernes identiques. Mais il avait mené une
vie trop différente de la leur pour pouvoir fraterniser avec eux, trop
jeune encore pour les accepter tels qu’il les voyait, obscènes et
brutaux.
Les gradés maniaient le règlement comme une arme redoutable.
Ils passaient enivrés de leur puissance sans limites, de leur gloire.
Deux galons rouges cousus sur les manches d’un bouvier le
rendaient infaillible et inviolable. Vaneau ne demandait pas mieux
qu’il en fût ainsi. Mais il les vit mauvais, rancuniers comme de
simples mortels, ignorants, quelques-uns stupides. Alors il se révolta,
timidement d’abord, puis avec certitude. De leurs galons que le
premier venu pouvait porter, il ne voulut pas. Et Vaneau apprit à
connaître la salle de police, les repas que l’on y fait assis sur le dur
rebord du lit de camp, sa gamelle entre les genoux, et les après-midi
de dimanches que l’on passe à récolter des brins de paille dans la
cour.
Il sortait souvent le soir après la soupe. C’étaient presque quatre
heures de liberté dans une ville qui avait l’air de mettre à sa portée
tous les plaisirs du monde dans des rues brillamment illuminées ; de
petites ouvrières sentimentales y passent qui tout le jour ont chanté
des romances. Mais pour les éblouir il n’avait point de galons qui
étincellent comme des miroirs à alouettes. Il n’avait pas assez
d’argent pour s’asseoir dans les cafés luxueux où parmi la musique
et la fumée des cigares on peut oublier que l’on est soldat. Et il ne
pouvait pas non plus s’attarder avec les autres dans les gargotes
louches. Trois et quatre heures durant il se promenait seul, préférant
les rues désertes, les ruelles obscures. Il allait inconnu, anonyme,
mais vêtu d’effets matriculés, armé d’une baïonnette qu’il n’aurait
jamais eu l’audace d’enfoncer dans la poitrine d’un homme. Il
marchait vite comme pressé d’arriver quelque part, mais sans but.
Le dimanche il errait dans les prairies qui entourent la ville, suivant
les bords du fleuve et du canal sous les coteaux plantés d’arbres et
de vignes, mais traînant avec lui l’idée de sa servitude comme un
âne attaché par une corde à un bateau. De l’entrée du vieux pont de
pierre il s’attardait à regarder la ville avec ses maisons qui grimpent
vers la cathédrale dont la tour les domine, et vers le palais des Ducs
qu’elles masquent. La Loire coulait sur du sable fin entre des îles
dont les dimensions varient au gré des saisons et des crues. Il se
souvint longtemps d’un splendide dimanche de Pâques où les
cloches de la cathédrale et des églises chantaient la résurrection du
Christ et le retour du printemps. Des jeunes gens avec des jeunes
filles en robes claires passaient ironiques devant la caserne, s’en
allant rire dans les guinguettes. Lui, de faction, immobile, l’arme au
pied, les regardait.
Il fit des marches et des exercices de nuit, brûlant des
cartouches contre un ennemi que représentaient soit une haie bien
taillée, soit de vieux saules difformes, des feux de guerre dans une
plaine sinistre brûlée par le soleil, plus vaste à elle seule que cent
cours de casernes, de grandes manœuvres avec le sac chargé
réglementairement ; la sueur tombait de son front dans la poussière
stérile. Comme autrefois lors des promenades d’hiver, quand il voyait
avec envie des enfants de son âge derrière les vitres de leurs
maisons mordre dans des tartines, il eût voulu être un des paysans
qui debout sur leurs seuils ombragés regardaient passer les soldats.
Mais il pensait surtout aux jeunes gens riches qui ont assez de
relations pour se faire exempter du service militaire. Il les devinait à